PFS: Financial Aspect - Investment Costs
PFS: Financial Aspect - Investment Costs
a. Fixed investments include Land and site preparation, Buildings and civil works, Plant machinery and
equipment including auxiliary equipment, and Industrial property rights.
b. Pre-operating expenditures - These expenditures which have to be capitalized include
1. Preliminary and capital issue expenditure (e.g. registration and formulation of the company
including legal fees, capital issue expenditures, preparation of prospectus, underwriting
commissions, brokerage, etc.)
2. Expenditures for preparatory studies (e.g. consultant fees for preparing the studies and other
expenses for planning the project).
3. Pre-production expenditure which include salaries, travel expense, training costs incurred during
the pre-production period.
4. Trial runs, start-up and commissioning expenditures.
c. Net Working Capital (covered in Chapter 15)
It indicates the financial means required to operate the project according to its production program.
Net Working Capital = Current Assets minus Current Liabilities
Current Asset comprise:
a. Account Receivable – The size of account receivable is determined by the company’s credit sale
policy and may be computed using the following formula:
𝐀𝐧𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐞
𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 = 𝐱 𝐂𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡𝐬
𝟏𝟐 𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒉𝒔
b. Inventories – Working capital requirements are considerably affected by the amount of capital
immobilized in the form of inventories.
1.Production materials – In computing, consideration should be given to the sources and
modes of supplies of materials and finished goods.
If materials are locally available, only limited stocks should be maintained unless
there are special storage problems.
If materials are imported and if import procedures are dilatory, inventories
equivalent to as much as six months consumption may have to be maintained.
2. Spare parts – Levels of spare parts inventories depend on the local availability of supplies,
import procedures and maintenance facilities in the area and on the nature of the plant
itself.
3. Work-in-progress – The valuation is made at the factory costs of work-in-progress.
4. Finished goods – The valuation is made at the factory costs plus administrative overheads.
ECONOMIC EVALUATION
Financial evaluation quantifies the results of marketing, technical, management, taxation and legal phases
and expresses in peso terms the possible profitability of the project. This should preferably rely on discounting
methods and incorporate sensitivity analysis.
Inclusion of projected statement in the financial study assists in the evaluation of the results of the financial
projections as to profitability, liquidity and solvency of the projects and its ability to withstand difficulties.
To measure profitability To measure liquidity
1. Common-size projected financial statements 1. Current ratio
2. Rate of return on investments 2. Acid test ratio
i. Discounted rate of return 3. Payback period
ii. Accounting rate of return 4. Cash break-even
iii. Profitability index To measure financial leverage
3. Cost-Volume-Profit/Break-even Analysis 1. Debt-to-equity ratio
4. Earnings per share 2. Equity to assets ratio
3. Debt service break-even point
4. Times interest earned
𝐅𝐈𝐗𝐄𝐃 𝐂𝐎𝐒𝐓𝐒
Break-even Formula: 𝐁𝐄𝐏 (𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐬) = 𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒕 𝒔𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒆−𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒕 𝒗𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒔
Illustrative Case: Tyro Products manufactures recreational equipment. One of the company’s products, a
skateboard, sell for P37.50. The skateboards are manufactured in an antiquated plant that relies heavily on the
direct labor workers. Thus, variable costs are high, totalling P22.50 per skateboard.
Over the past year the company sold 40,000 skateboards, woth the following operating results:
Sales (40,000 skateboard) P1,500,000
Less variable expenses 900,000
Contribution margin 600,000
Less fixed expenses 480,000
Net income P120,000
Management is anxious to maintain and perhaps even improve its present level of income from the skateboards.
Required:
1. Compute the contribution margin and the break-even point in the skateboard, and the degree of operating
leverage at last year’s level of sales.
2. The company is considering the construction of a new, automated plant to manufacture the skateboard,
the new plant would slash variable costs by 40%, but it would cause fixed cost to increase 90%. Of the
new plant is built, what would be the company’s new CM ration and the new break-even point in
skateboards?
Analysis:
1.
Contribution margin is the amount used to absorb fixed costs and contribute to profit.
Illustrative Case: Rain Mines Inc., is considering investment in the mining rights to a large tract of land in a
mountainous area. The tract contains a mineral deposit that the company believes might be commercially
attractive to mine and sell. An engineering and cost analysis has been made, and it is expected that the following
cash flows would be associated with opening and operating a mine in the area:
Cost of equipment required P850,000
Net annual cash receipts 230,000*
Working capital required 100,000
Cost of road repairs in three years 60,000
Salvage value of equipment in five years 200,000
Receipts from sales of ore, less out-of-pocket costs for salaries, utilities, insurance, and so forth.
It is estimated that the mineral deposit would be exhausted after five years of mining, at that point, the working
capital would be released for reinvestment elsewhere. The company’s cost of capital is 14%.
Required (ignore income taxes): Determine the net present value of the proposed mining project. Should the
project be undertaken? Explain.
Analysis:
End of 14% PV of Cash Flows
Relevant Items Amount of Cash Flows
Year(s) Factor
Cost of equipment 0 P(850,000) 1.000 P(850,000)
Working capital required 0 (100,000) 1.000 (100,000)
Net annual cash receipts 1-5 230,000 3.433 789,590
Cost of road repairs 3 (60,000) 0.675 (40,500)
Salvage value of equipment 5 200,000 0.519 103,800
Working capital released 5 100,000 0.519 51,900
NPV P(45,210)
The project should not be undertaken because it will not earn the minimum desired rate of return of 14%.
Illustrative Case: Ms. Helen Soriano is the managing partner of the Alabang Consultancy Service, Inc. Ms.
Soriano is trying to determine whether or not the firm should move client files and other items out of a spare room
in the main office and use the room for consultant’s work. She has determined that it would require an investment
of P142,950 for equipment and related costs of getting the room ready for use. Based on receipts being generated
from other rooms in the main office, Ms. Soriano estimates that the new room would generate a net cash inflow
P37,500 per year. The equipment purchased for the room would have a seven-year estimated useful life.
Require (ignore income taxes):
1. Compute the IRR on the equipment for the new room.
𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 P142,950
𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐑𝐑 = = = 𝟑. 𝟖𝟏𝟐
𝑨𝒏𝒏𝒖𝒂𝒍 𝑪𝒂𝒔𝒉 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒍𝒐𝒘 P37,500
From the table for Present Value of an Annuity of P1 in Arrears, reading along the 7-period line, a factor
of 3.812 equals an 18 % rate of return.
Verification of the 18%:
14% Factor Present
Amount of
Relevant Items Year(s) Value of
Cash Flows
Cash Flows
Investment of equipment now P(142,950) 1.000 P(142,950)
Annual cash inflows 1-7 37,500 3.812 142,950
Net present value P -0-
IRR of the project is therefore 18%.
Illustrative Case: Solid Rock Inc. has a cost of capital of 15% and is considering the acquisition of a new machine
which costs P4,000,000 and has a useful life of five years. Solid Rock projects that the after-tax cash flows will
increase as follows:
Year After-tax Cash Flow 15% interest rate factors
Present value of 1
1 P2,000,000 0.87
2 1,500,000 0.76
3 1,000,000 0.66
4 1,000,000 0.57
5 1,000,000 0.50
Required: What is the DPP of the new machine?
Analysis:
1. Determine the present value of the increase in after-tax Cash Flows.
Year Amount PV Factor PV Total
1 P2,000,000 0.87 1,740,000 1,740,000
2 1,500,000 0.76 1,140,000 2,880,000
3 1,000,000 0.66 660,000 3,540,000
4 1,000,000 0.57 570,000 4,110,000
5 1,000,000 0.50 500,000 4,610,000
2. Cumulate the present value of the cash inflows until it equals the initial outflow.
4,000,000−3,540,000
𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑃𝑎𝑦𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 = 3 𝑦𝑟𝑠 + ( 𝑥 1 𝑦𝑟)
570,000
𝑫𝑷𝑷 = 𝟑. 𝟖𝟏 𝒚𝒓𝒔
Payback Period
Payback period is the length of time that it takes for an investment project to recoup its own initial cost
out of the cash receipts that it generates. Bail-out payback period considers the salvage value of the asset as part
of cash inflows.
Procedure:
1. When the net annual cash inflow is the same every year, divide the investment required by the net
annual cash flow.
2. When the net annual cash inflow is not uniform every year, cumulate (add) the annual cash inflow until
it equals the investment required. Determine the length of time required to accomplish such.
Decision Rule:
1. If the payback period is equal, to or shorter than the maximum allowable payback period by the investor,
accept the project.
2. If the payback period is longer than the maximum allowable payback period by the investor, reject the
project.
Illustrative Case: An investment of P150,000 is expected to produce annual cash earnings of P50,000 for
years. Its estimated salvage value is P70,000 at the end of the first year and this is expected to decrease by
P15,000 annually.
Required:
1. What is the payback period?
150,000
𝑃𝑎𝑦𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 = = 𝟑 𝒚𝒓𝒔
50,000
2. What is the bail-out payback period?
Year Annual Cash Return Salvage Value
1 P50,000 P70,000
2 50,000 55,000
3 50,000 40,000
4 50,000 25,000
5 50,000 10,000
Decision Rule:
If ARR is equal to or exceeds the minimum desired rate of return, project proposal may be
accepted. If ARR is less than the minimum desired rate of return, reject the proposal.
Illustrative Case: Mindanao Farms, Inc. hires people on a part-time basis to sort eggs. The cost of this hand-
sorting process is P30,000 per year. The company is investigating the purchase of an egg-sorting machine that
would cost P90,000 and have a 15-year useful life. The machine would have negligible salvage value, and it
would cost P10,000 per year to operate and maintain. The egg-sorting equipment currently being used could be
sold for a scrap value of P2,500.
Required: Compute the simple rate of return on the new egg-sorting machine.
Analysis:
𝑃20,000𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑠𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 − 𝑃6,000 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑛 𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑝𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
𝐴𝑅𝑅 = = 𝟏𝟔. 𝟎%
𝑃90,000 − 𝑃2,500
P30,000 – P10,000 = P20,000 cost savings
P90,000 ÷ 15 years = P6,000 depreciation
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Sensitivity analysis is frequently used if an improvement is felt to be possible by changing some of the
variables. It should be applied already during the project planning stage, when decisions concerning major inputs
are being taken. With the help of sensitivity analysis, it is easy to identify the most important factors in a project,
such as raw materials, labor and energy, and to determine any possibilities of input substitution.
Illustrative Case: West Cost Chemical Company is considering investing in a project that will require investment
of P468,000. The project’s expected annual cash inflows will amount to P 140,000 for five years.
Requirement 1:
Because of uncertainty of times and volatility of interest rates, management would like toknow if the
investment should be made if the cost if capital is a) 10%? b) 12%? c) 16%?
Analysis:
NPV Approach:
10% 12% 16%
Present value of the annual cash P530,6001 P505,4002 P457,8003
flows
Less: Investment 468,000 468,000 468,000
Net Present Value P62,800 P37,400 P(27,200)
1 2 3
P140,000 x 3.79 P140,000 x 3.61 P140,000 x 3.27
The investment may be made if the cost of capital is 12% or less but should be rejected if the cost of
capital is 16%.
Calculation of IRR will be as follows:
468,000 = 140,000 x F
F = 3.343
Interpolate between 14% and 16%.
3.43 − 3.343
𝐼𝑅𝑅 = 14% + ( 𝑥 2%)
3.43 − 3.270
0.087
𝐼𝑅𝑅 = 14% + ( 𝑥 2%)
0.16
𝐼𝑅𝑅 = 15.09%
If the cost of capital is 15.09% or less, the investment may be made.
Requirement 2:
Supposing that management projects the annual cash flows as follows:
Worst Case Scenario = P100,000 Best Case Scenario = P150,000
If the cost of capital is 12%, should the investment be made under each scenario?
Analysis:
Worst Case Scenario Best Case Scenario
Present value of the annual cash returns
I (P100,000 x 3.61) P361,000
II (P150,000 x 3.61) P541,500
Less: Investment 468,000 468,000
Net Present Value P(107,000) P73,500
The company should reject the proposed investment if the annual expected cash flows will only amount
to P100,000 under the worst case scenario. In this case, determine the minimum annual cash flows to justify the
investment.
Divide the amount of investment by Present Value of an Annuity of 1, at 12% where n=5.
468,000
= 𝑃129,640
3.61
Therefore, if the investment would generate annual cash flows of at least P129,640, then it should be
pursued because it would earn the minimum desired rate of return of 12%.