Asics Case Analysis
Asics Case Analysis
Political- NA
Economic
In 1980s, Japan experienced a rapid economic growth and the
company was able to diversify its product in new areas such as
tennis, badminton etc.
In early 1990s, the domestic market in Japan saw a sharp downturn
triggered by the burst of the asset inflated economy and this caused
heavy losses to Asics.
Social
Japan’s declining and aging population affected Asics sales
detrimentally.
From 1990-2013, there has been an increase in the number of
people participating in marathons, which in turn increased Asics
sale.
Increased participation in sports like Tennis, Rugby Basketball also
increased the sale of Asics.
Later, the age of the marathon runners increased and Exhibit 1 also
shows the number of Marathon runners decreased from 2013
onwards. More people participated in 5K and 10K runs. Hence, this
decreased Asics demand.
Technology
Sales through e-commerce platform.
Increase in the number of fitness apps used by the people to
monitor their health drove Asics to acquire Runkeeper, which
increased their customer base.
Environment-NA
Legal-NA
SWOT ANALYSIS
STRENGTH
PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION THROUGH INNOVATION
The company has constantly increased the quality of the products through innovation using
advanced technologies. Due to their superior cushioning, shock absorbent technologies and gel
technologies they have been very popular for the serious runner segments or the professional
athletes
WEAKNESS
NOT POPULAR IN FUN SEGMENT
The Asics product price ranged from 150 $ to 200$. The products were not popular with the
‘fun segment’ who would generally buy at a range of 50 to 75 $
OPPORTUNITY
MIDTIER SEGMENT HAS A LOT OF CUSTOMERS
Diversifying in this segment can increase the customer base
ASICS AND ASICS TIGER BRAND CAN BE MODIFIED TO TARGET FEMALE CUSTOMER BASE AS
WELL
USING RUNKEEPER TO ENHANCE THE ECOMMERCE PLATFORM
ENHANCING DTC THROUGH RUNKEEPER APP
DIVERSING AND EXPLORING THE FITNESS SEGMENT
ASSOCIATING WITH JAPANESE ROOTS THROUGH TOKYO OLYMPICS MIGHT PROVIDE MORE
SALES FOR THE COMPANY
THREATS
COMPETITORS LIKE NIKE, ADIDAS, PUMA, UNDER ARMOUR AND NEW BALANCE ARE THREATS TO
ASICS BUSINESS. LOSING SPONSHOIRSHIP OF NEW YORK MARATHON TO NEW BALANCE SENDS A
NEGATIVE MESSAGE TO THE CUSTOMERS.
Puma
Sales revenue =Euro 3.4 Billion
Net Profit= Euro 37.1 million
Under Armour
Sales revenue =USD3.96Billion
Net Income=USD 232Million
New Balance
Sales revenue =USD3.3Billion
Business problem
1>Do you think the Company is following right track to
ensure attainment of AGP 2020?
As per exhibit 2 and exhibit 7
We see:
ASICS net income is much less as compared to UNDER ARMOUR
Even the ROE is less.
The company is in the right track for growth. The association with Runkeeper will help the
company expand the customer base and diversify into fitness segment.
But to achieve 750 billion-yen sales in 2020 is a quite lofty target. This would need a revenue
increment of 15 % per year and we do not think that they will be able to achieve the target
since the sales and administrative expense is quite high for Asics and with the acquisition of
Runkeeper this expense will increase.
OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS:
Increase the market in South East Asia and Oceania.
Target potential markets such as India and South Africa
Modify the ASICS and ASICS tiger brand products to target female segments as well.
Modify the BRAND logos in order to distinguish them to avoid brand confusion.