Identifying The Proper Impedance Plane and Fault Trajectories in Distance Protection Analysis
Identifying The Proper Impedance Plane and Fault Trajectories in Distance Protection Analysis
Presented at the
66th Annual Georgia Tech Protective Relaying Conference
Atlanta, Georgia
April 25–27, 2012
Abstract—Distance relay characteristics have long been fault type selection logic on the characteristic that the distance
discussed in literature, but with little regard to the impedance relay presents to a fault. This knowledge is also important to
plane to which they refer. Numerical distance relays include properly test distance relays.
phase and ground elements with different characteristics. They
also include power swing detection, load encroachment, and
Distance relays typically include directional elements. In
directional elements that generally require different impedance many cases, these directional elements respond to different
planes than those used for distance elements. quantities (for example, negative- or zero-sequence quantities)
This paper centers on the selection of the impedance plane for from those of the distance elements. In one implementation,
analyzing the operation of distance, power swing detection, and the directional elements measure the negative- or zero-
directional elements. With simple power system models, this sequence impedance [7]. A common misconception is to try to
paper shows element characteristics and impedance loci and
represent directional element characteristics on the same plane
trajectories on different planes to explain the concepts and
discuss practical applications. This paper also describes a real used for distance elements.
power system disturbance and illustrates the use of different Multifunction relays include other protection elements,
impedance planes for analyzing protection element operation. such as power swing detection and load-encroachment
elements, that typically respond to positive-sequence
I. INTRODUCTION quantities. These elements require a positive-sequence
Distance protection generally requires six elements (AB, impedance plane for analysis, instead of the plane used for
BC, CA, AG, BG, and CG) to protect against the ten possible distance elements.
fault types. These elements are continuously monitoring the This paper focuses on the proper selection of the
power system. In most cases, more than one element may impedance plane for analyzing the operation of distance,
operate for a given fault or other abnormal condition. In directional, and other protection elements. Using computer
general, both the distance element characteristics and the simulation results from simple power system models, the
impedances measured during faults depend on the fault type paper shows element characteristics and impedance loci and
and the prefault system operating conditions. trajectories on different planes to explain the concepts and
The impedance or R-X plane has been traditionally used to discuss practical applications.
analyze distance element operation for different power system
conditions, such as faults, power swings, and load conditions II. IMPEDANCE PLANES
[1] [2] [3] [4]. This method of analysis requires the element A way to analyze the operation of two-input protection
operating characteristic and the impedance measured by the elements is to use a complex plane defined by the ratio of the
element for the given power system condition to be plotted on input signals. Two planes have been mainly used in protective
the same plane. The element operates when the measured relaying: the impedance plane and the current-ratio plane. The
impedance falls in the operating region of its characteristic. admittance plane, an alternative to the impedance plane, is
For unbalanced faults, more than one impedance plane can seldom used.
be used to analyze distance element operation. For example, The impedance plane is a tool to analyze distance,
the operation of the BC distance element for a CA fault can be directional, and power swing detection element operation by
analyzed on the ZBC impedance plane or the ZCA impedance superimposing element operating characteristics and the
plane. The element characteristic and the measured impedance measured impedances for various power system conditions,
look different on both planes. Many publications address including faults, power swings, and normal load conditions.
distance element characteristics and measured impedances but
A. Impedance Planes for Distance Elements
do not explicitly discuss the impact of the plane selected for
analysis. 1) Measured or Apparent Impedance
Multifunction line protection relays have fault selectors Distance elements respond to voltage (V) and current (I)
that enable only the appropriate distance elements for a given signals measured at their location in the power system. These
fault [5] [6]. Electromechanical protection schemes have elements perform phase or amplitude comparison of signals
standalone relays with OR tripping logic [1]. It is important to derived from V and I to create operating characteristics [3] [4]
understand the practical impact of the presence or absence of [6] [7] [8] [9].
2
Dividing (8) and (9) by the current (to convert them into depicts the resulting BC element characteristics on the ZBC
impedance equations), we obtain (10) and (11). Reference [8] plane for the different types of forward faults. For the BC
describes the symmetrical component operations required to fault, the characteristic is the same as that in Fig. 4.
derive (11). TABLE II
S1 VB − VC b PHASOR VALUES FOR THE BC ELEMENT FOR DIFFERENT
= − Zc = ZBC − Zc (10) TYPES OF FORWARD FAULTS*
IB − IC IB − IC
Fault Type IA1/IA2 b
S2 VB − VC VB2 − VC2
= − BG a 2
–ZS1/(1 – a2)
IB − IC IB − IC (IB1 − IC1) − (IB2 − IC2)
(11) CG a –ZS1/(1 – a)
VB2 − VC2
= ZBC − AB –a ZS1/a2
(IB1 − IC1) − (IB2 − IC2)
BC –1 –ZS1/2
For a forward BC fault in a simple radial network, we 2
CA –a ZS1/a
obtain the a and b phasors from (7), (10), and (11) [8] [9]:
* j120
In Table II, a = e
a = Zc (12)
ZS1
b=− (13)
2
where:
ZS1 is the source positive-sequence impedance.
Fig. 4 shows the BC mho element characteristic for
forward BC faults. This polarized mho element uses unfaulted
phase information in the polarizing quantity by using the
positive-sequence voltage. This polarizing quantity expands
the circle to the third quadrant for forward faults. The mho
characteristic has a fixed reach point, defined by the setting Fig. 5. BC element characteristics for different types of forward faults. The
labels refer to fault types.
impedance Zc.
X
As mentioned previously, we can also use the fault loop
ZBC a = Zc impedance plane. As an example, Fig. 6 shows the
Plane characteristics of all the distance elements for a BC fault on
the ZBC plane. In this example, the ZBC plane is the fault
loop plane, and the characteristics of the distance elements
receiving input signals from other phases differ from that of
the faulted phase BC element. The BC element characteristic
is the same as that in Fig. 4.
R
–ZS1
b=
2
result, the relay presents only the characteristic corresponding However, the element characteristics for BC and BCG
to the faulted phases (for example, the characteristic for the faults are slightly different because IA1 = –IA2 for BC faults
BC fault in Fig. 4) and does not present all the other in radial systems but IA1 ≠ –IA2 for BCG faults. As a result,
characteristics shown in Fig. 6. Electromechanical distance the value of the b phasor corresponding to BCG faults is
protection schemes consist of single-function relays with OR different from the value for BC faults.
tripping logic and typically without any phase selection Fig. 8 shows the sequence network for a bolted BCG fault
supervising logic. Hence, the scheme presents all the phase in a radial system. Equation (18) gives the IA1/IA2 ratio for
and ground element characteristics for all faults. The this fault.
composite characteristic, therefore, looks similar to Fig. 6.
IA1 (ZS2 + ZL1) + (ZS0 + ZL0)
=– (18)
2) Reverse Faults IA2 ZS0 + ZL0
For a reverse BC fault, the distance element input currents
flow in the nontripping direction. Equations (16) and (17) give
the a and b phasors for reverse BC faults [8] [9]. The b phasor
has the opposite sign as that for forward faults.
a = Zc (16)
ZS1
b= (17)
2
Fig. 7 shows the BC mho element characteristic for reverse
BC faults. The figure also shows the characteristic for forward
faults (dotted circle) for comparison. The polarizing quantity
reduces the circle in the first quadrant for reverse faults. The
mho characteristic keeps its fixed reach point, defined by the
setting impedance Zc. The element is directional, because the
apparent impedance for reverse faults plots in the third Fig. 8. Symmetrical component network for a phase-to-phase-to-ground
fault.
quadrant.
Equation (18) shows that, when the zero-sequence
impedances are much larger than the positive-sequence
impedances, IA1/IA2 approaches –1 (as it corresponds to a
BC fault) and the BC element characteristic for a BCG fault
approaches that of the BC fault.
B. Effect of Load
In radial systems and unloaded homogeneous two-source
systems, the fault resistance RF plots as a horizontal line on
the apparent impedance plane [4]. The effect of load is to
introduce a reactive component that effectively tilts the
apparent fault impedance downwards or upwards, depending
Fig. 7. BC polarized mho element characteristic for reverse BC faults. on the load flow direction. This tilt produces distance element
3) Phase-to-Phase-to-Ground Faults overreach or underreach [4] [6] [8] [10].
According to Table I, three distance elements correctly Distance elements implemented with comparators and with
measure ZL1 for a BCG fault: the BC, BG, and CG elements. the proper polarizing quantity exhibit beneficial adaptive
This behavior repeats for the other two phase-to-phase-to- characteristics with respect to load flow [4] [6] [10].
ground faults. To illustrate this concept, consider the phase polarized mho
Distance relays typically enable only the phase element for element described by (8) and (9). The a and b phasors for
phase-to-phase-to-ground faults because ground distance forward faults are defined by (14) and (15). For BC faults
elements may overreach for these faults when they include under radial or no-load conditions, IA1 and IA2 are pure fault
fault resistance [4]. In addition, single-pole tripping (SPT) currents and IA1 = –IA2. When load flow is present, IA1
schemes should trip all three breaker poles for these includes the load current component while IA2 does not, so
multiphase faults. In our example, only the BC element is IA1 ≠ –IA2. Hence, the element characteristic differs from
enabled for BCG faults. Hence, the a and b phasor that for the no-load condition.
expressions for BCG faults are the same as those for BC One approach to illustrate the effect of load is to use
faults: (14) and (15) give a and b for forward faults, and (16) incremental quantities [11]. Using superposition, any fault
and (17), for reverse faults. current can be represented as the sum of the prefault current
6
and the incremental or fault current. For balanced load characteristics are typically represented as static
conditions, the prefault component appears only in the characteristics in manufacturer manuals for practical reasons.
positive-sequence current, as (19) and (20) show. However, the user should be aware that the characteristics
I1 = ILD + ΔI1 (19) change during faults or when testing the relay.
In contrast, the characteristics on the apparent impedance
I2 = ΔI2 (20)
plane of self-polarized distance elements (such as the mho
where: element polarized with the voltages given in Table I and the
ILD is the prefault load current. phase current polarized reactance and resistance elements) are
∆I1 and ∆I2 are the incremental currents (∆I1 = –∆I2). static. For example, the characteristic of a self-polarized mho
Equation (21) provides the expression for the b phasor that element is a circle that crosses by the origin of coordinates and
defines the BC element characteristic, considering the effect does not expand or contract during faults. As a result, this
of load [8] [9]. element may lack directionality for some fault locations and
types. The characteristics of self-polarized distance elements
–ZS1
b= (21) do not adapt to changing power system conditions.
ILD
2– C. Fault Loci
IA2
Fig. 9 illustrates the behavior of the BC mho distance The previous sections refer to representing distance
element for four combinations of ILD and I2. For the no-load element characteristics on the impedance plane. Analyzing
condition, (21) takes the form of (13) and the mho element has distance element operation for faults requires plotting on the
the no-load Characteristic 0 in Fig. 9. Forward power flow same impedance plane the impedances measured for these
(arg (ILD) = 0°) causes the characteristics to shift to the left faults. This is the purpose of this section. We will see that, for
(Characteristics 1 and 3). For reverse power flow (arg (ILD) = practical purposes, it is sometimes convenient to represent the
180°), the characteristics shift to the right (Characteristics 2 impedance loci measured by several distance elements on the
and 4). For higher ILD/I2 values, these shifts are more same impedance plane.
noticeable (Characteristics 3 and 4). As mentioned previously, the measured impedance Z plots
as a point on the impedance plane for any steady-state
ZBC Plane X
condition. During transient events, Z varies with time and
10
describes a trajectory on the impedance plane.
It is possible to generate a locus composed of many steady-
2
state measured impedance values by running multiple
5 1
0 simulation cases for different parameter values. We use the
example power system shown in Fig. 10 to show the measured
3 impedance loci resulting from varying the fault resistance RF.
0 R
VS = 70∠0° S m = 0.5 R VR = 70∠δ = 70∠ –20°
4
–5
RF
–10 –5 0 5 10 ZS1 = ZS2 = 4∠85° ZR1 = ZR2 = 4∠85°
ZS0 = 12∠85° ZL1 = 5∠85°
Fig. 9. BC element characteristics for different values of ILD/I2. ZR0 = 12∠85°
Characteristic 0 is for no load; Characteristic 1 is for ILD/I2 = 0.3, ZL0 = 15∠85°
arg (ILD) = 0°, arg (I2) = –85°; Characteristic 2 is for ILD/I2 = 0.3, All impedances are in secondary ohms
arg (ILD) = 180°, arg (I2) = –85°; Characteristic 3 is for ILD/I2 = 1,
arg (ILD) = 0°, arg (I2) = –5°; and Characteristic 4 is for ILD/I2 = 1, Fig. 10. Example two-source power system.
arg (ILD) = 180°, arg (I2) = –5°.
Fig. 11 through Fig. 14 show the measured impedance loci
Other distance elements, like the sequence current for all distance elements at Buses S and R in Fig. 10 for
polarized reactance and resistance elements used in midline faults with different RF values. These figures also
quadrilateral distance elements, show a more appreciable and show the V1/I1 loci. Active power flows from S to R and
beneficial shift in their characteristics [4] [6] [9]. reactive power flows from R to S in these examples. Fig. 11
In general, the characteristics on the apparent impedance and Fig. 12 represent AG faults. Fig. 13 and Fig. 14 represent
plane of multiphase polarized distance elements (such as the BC faults. These figures are fault loop impedance planes.
positive-sequence polarized mho or the sequence current For load conditions (RF = ∞), all the distance elements
polarized reactance and resistance elements) are dynamic measure equal impedances. These impedances plot in the
(they vary with the fault direction, the prefault power flow, or fourth quadrant for the Bus S elements (Fig. 11 and Fig. 13)
the source impedance). This dynamic behavior results from because active power flows in the forward direction and
the fact that the element receives unfaulted phase information reactive power flows in the reverse direction. For the Bus R
in addition to the faulted phase information that is properly elements (Fig. 12 and Fig. 14), the load impedance plots in the
reflected on the apparent impedance plane. These second quadrant.
7
Fig. 14. Loci of the impedances measured by all distance elements at Bus R
for BC faults with RF varying from RF = ∞ (shown by the point) to RF = 0
(reverse load flow). The labels refer to distance elements.
Fig. 12. Loci of the impedances measured by all distance elements at Bus R
for AG faults with RF varying from RF = ∞ (shown by the point) to RF = 0
(reverse load flow). The labels refer to distance elements.
Fig. 15. In double-circuit lines, magnetic mutual coupling affects ground
distance and directional elements that use zero-sequence quantities.
The effect of having different zero-sequence compensation corresponding to the six fault loops and the positive-sequence
factors for Zone 1 and Zone 2 ground distance elements is that impedance plane are equivalent for any balanced power
these elements measure different impedances for the same system condition. However, power swings occurring during
ground fault. the open-phase period following a single-pole trip make these
Consider the example 230 kV system shown in Fig. 16, planes different, as we show in this section.
which includes a parallel double-circuit line. In the relay
A. Element Characteristics
shown in Fig. 16, Zone 1 and Zone 2 are set at 80 and
120 percent of the line impedance, respectively. From (6) and Power system disturbances cause oscillations of machine
(22), we obtain k0 = 0.767 for the Zone 1 element and k0M = rotors that result in power flow swings.
1.476 for the Zone 2 element. The impedance measured by distance elements during
power swings may penetrate element operating characteristics.
ZS1 = ZS2 = 19.80∠80.70° ZR1 = ZR2 = 19.80∠80.79°
Power swing detection elements may be used to prevent
ZS0 = 50.38∠79.48° ZR0 = 50.38∠79.48°
distance element misoperation (power swing blocking) or
Z0M = 34.398∠80.09° initiate system islanding for unstable power swings (out-of-
step tripping).
Power swing detection is often based on the rate of change
k0 = 0.767∠ –0.32° of the measured impedance [13]. The traditional approach is to
k0M = 1.476∠ –0.686°
compare the measured phase or positive-sequence impedance
ZL1 = 16.175∠81.16° with an element characteristic on the impedance plane. This
ZL0 = 53.378∠80.93° characteristic may consist of circles, blinders, or polygons.
Fig. 16. Example 230 kV system that includes a double-circuit line. Fig. 18 shows a characteristic composed of two concentric
polygons defined on the positive-sequence impedance plane.
Using a simulation program, an AG fault is applied at the Measuring the time that the apparent impedance stays between
remote right-hand-side bus. Fig. 17 illustrates the effect of both polygons allows for discrimination between faults and
using the traditional k0 value for Zone 1 and the compensated power swings.
k0M value for Zone 2: the AG Zone 1 element measures an
X(Ohms) V1/I1 Plane
impedance higher than that measured by the AG Zone 2
element. The mutual coupling compensation applied in k0M
places the line-end fault under the reach of the Zone 2 20
element. Without this compensation, the Zone 2 element
would measure the same impedance as the Zone 1 element and
underreach for this fault. 0
–20
–20 0 20
R(Ohms)
Fig. 20. A-phase open symmetrical component network used to find the
impedance trajectories during a power swing.
Fig. 19. The trajectory of a balanced power swing is the same on the V1/I1,
ZAB, ZBC, ZCA, ZAG, ZBG, and ZCG impedance planes.
Fig. 22 shows the positive-sequence impedance trajectories This element compares z2 against two thresholds. If z2 is
for a balanced power swing (the same as that in Fig. 19) and less than a forward fault threshold, the element declares a
an unbalanced power swing, with V1 calculated using bus- forward fault. If z2 is greater than a reverse fault threshold, the
side and line-side voltage. When considered in the part of the element declares a reverse fault. Equation (25) gives the
impedance plane where the power swing characteristics are forward threshold and (26), the reverse threshold (for Z2F > 0
placed, all the trajectories have the same shape and no and Z2R > 0).
significant shift. V2
1.25 Z2F – 0.25 (25)
I2
V2
0.75 Z2R + 0.25 (26)
I2
where:
Z2F and Z2R are relay settings.
Equating (24) to (25) and (26) and solving for V2/V1, we
obtain (27) and (28), which define the forward and reverse
operating characteristics on the V2/I2 plane shown in Fig. 23.
V2 1.25 Z2F
= (27)
Fig. 22. Power swing trajectories for a balanced power swing (Trajectory 1) I2 ⎛ V2 ⎞
cos ⎜ ∠ – ∠ZL1⎟ + 0.25
and for unbalanced power swings, using line-side (Trajectory 2) and bus-side ⎝ I2 ⎠
(Trajectory 3) voltage to calculate V1.
V2 0.75 Z2R
V. NEGATIVE-SEQUENCE (V2/I2) AND =
I2 ⎛ V2 ⎞ (28)
ZERO-SEQUENCE (V0/I0) IMPEDANCE PLANES cos ⎜ ∠ – ∠ZL1⎟ − 0.25
⎝ I2 ⎠
Some relays include directional elements that respond to
the negative- or zero-sequence voltage and current. The
negative-sequence (V2/I2) or zero-sequence (V0/I0)
impedance planes should be used to analyze the operation of
these elements.
A. Element Characteristics
Traditional directional elements compare the angle between
a polarizing quantity (V2 or V0, for example) and an
operating quantity (I2 or I0). An implementation of negative-
and zero-sequence directional elements calculates an
impedance scalar quantity. For example, the negative-
sequence element calculates the scalar quantity z2 using (24)
[4] [7], which is the projection of V2/I2 on a straight line that
has the line impedance angle (∠ZL1). Fig. 23. Negative-sequence directional element characteristics.
z2 =
( (
Re V2 I2 e j∠ZL1 * ) ) = V2 cos ⎛ ∠ V2 – ∠ZL1⎞ (24)
The forward operating region is located below the forward
characteristic, and the reverse operating region is located
2 ⎜ ⎟
I2 I2 ⎝ I2 ⎠ above the reverse characteristic.
Similarly, the zero-sequence directional element calculates
where:
an impedance scalar quantity z0 and compares it against
* represents the phasor complex conjugate operation. forward and reverse thresholds.
11
1
0
2
3 Fig. 31 represents the event on the positive-sequence
impedance plane. It also shows the power swing detection
element characteristic. Point 0 represents the prefault
condition. Point 1 is the fault point. The impedance trajectory
between Point 0 and Point 1 represents the relay filtering
transient process triggered by the fault. Trajectory 2 that starts
at Point 1 is the unbalanced power swing during the B-phase
open period. This trajectory leaves the impedance plane on the
right side of the figure and returns on the left side
(Trajectory 3), already representing a balanced power swing.
After some oscillations close to the left side of the power
Fig. 28. Oscillogram recorded by an unfaulted 115 kV line relay. Section 0
is the prefault condition; Section 1 is an external BG fault followed by an swing detection element characteristic, this trajectory
incorrect single-pole trip; Section 2 is an unbalanced power swing during the eventually ends close to the initial operation Point 0.
B-phase open period; and Section 3 is a balanced power swing after faulted
X (Ohms)
line tripping and unfaulted line B-phase reclosing. X V1/I1 Plane
100
Fig. 29 shows the impedance measured by the local BG 80
ground distance elements on the ZBG plane. The fault 60
impedance plots far away from the element characteristics and 40
1 2
shows an apparent fault resistance value of approximately 20 0
8 secondary ohms. The polarized mho element characteristics 0
3
R
exhibit a significant expansion for this forward fault. These
–20
elements did not operate.
–40
–60
–80
–80 –60 –40 –20 0 20 40 60 80
R (Ohms)
VII. CONCLUSION
Fig. 29. ZBG plane representation of the external BG fault (Section 1 in
Fig. 28). From the study of impedance planes in this paper, the
following can be concluded:
Fig. 30 shows the impedance measured by the local
• Distance and directional elements perform signal
negative-sequence ground directional element. The negative-
phase comparison to create operating characteristics.
sequence impedance equals the source impedance behind the
The impedance plane serves to analyze the operation
relay and plots inside the element forward operating region.
of these elements by superimposing the characteristic
and the impedance measured by the element.
13
• Two impedance planes can be used for phase and [7] J. Roberts and A. Guzmán, “Directional Element Design and
Evaluation,” proceedings of the 21st Annual Western Protective Relay
ground distance elements: the apparent impedance Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1994.
plane (defined by the ratio of the element input [8] F. Calero, “Distance Elements: Linking Theory With Testing,”
signals) and the fault loop impedance plane (defined proceedings of the 62nd Annual Conference for Protective Relay
by the ratio of the signals corresponding to the faulted Engineers, College Station, TX, March 2009.
phases). [9] F. Calero, A. Guzmán, and G. Benmouyal, “Adaptive Phase and Ground
Quadrilateral Distance Elements,” proceedings of the 36th Annual
• The apparent impedance plane allows the analysis of
Western Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 2009.
element operation for faults, power swings, and load
[10] J. Roberts, A. Guzmán, and E. O. Schweitzer, III, “Z = V/I Does Not
conditions. Make a Distance Relay,” proceedings of the 20th Annual Western
• Other planes used in protective relaying include the Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1993.
positive-, negative-, and zero-sequence impedance [11] G. Benmouyal and J. Roberts, “Superimposed Quantities: Their True
planes and the current-ratio plane. Nature and Application in Relays,” proceedings of the 26th Annual
Western Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1999.
• Analyzing the operation of protection elements with
[12] F. Calero, “Mutual Impedance in Parallel Lines – Protective Relaying
different input signals requires different impedance and Fault Location Considerations,” proceedings of the 34th Annual
planes. For example, the characteristic of a negative- Western Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 2007.
or zero-sequence directional element should not be [13] D. A. Tziouvaras and D. Hou, “Out-of-Step Protection Fundamentals
represented on the same plane as the characteristics of and Advancements,” proceedings of the 30th Annual Western Protective
Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 2003.
phase or ground distance elements.
[14] F. Calero and D. Hou, “Practical Considerations for Single-Pole-Trip
• The characteristics on the apparent impedance plane Line-Protection Schemes,” proceedings of the 31st Annual Western
of self-polarized distance elements are static (do not Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 2004.
vary with the fault direction, the prefault power flow, [15] V. H. Serna, J. C. Rivera, H. E. Prado, H. J. Altuve, D. Sánchez, and
or the source impedance). J. Gallegos, “Transmission Line Single-Pole Tripping: Field Experience
in the Western Transmission Area of Mexico,” proceedings of the 37th
• The characteristics on the apparent impedance plane
Annual Western Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA,
of multiphase polarized distance elements (such as the October 2010.
positive-sequence polarized mho or the sequence [16] D. Hou, A. Guzmán, and J. Roberts, “Innovative Solutions Improve
current polarized reactance and resistance elements) Transmission Line Protection,” proceedings of the 24th Annual Western
are dynamic (they vary with the fault direction, the Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1997.
prefault power flow, or the source impedance). [17] A. Guzmán, J. Mooney, G. Benmouyal, and N. Fischer, “Transmission
Line Protection System for Increasing Power System Requirements,”
• For practical purposes, it is sometimes convenient to proceedings of the 55th Annual Conference for Protective Relay
use the same impedance plane to represent Engineers, College Station, TX, April 2002.
characteristics and impedances measured by distance
elements from different phases (see Fig. 11 through IX. BIOGRAPHIES
Fig. 14 and Fig. 21, for example). Care should be Fernando Calero received his BSEE in 1986 from the University of Kansas,
exercised during this process and when analyzing the his MSEE in 1987 from the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign), and
results. his MSEPE in 1989 from the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. From 1990 to
1996, he worked in Coral Springs, Florida, for the ABB relay division in the
• The use of tools that allow the visualization of the support, training, testing, and design of protective relays. Between 1997 and
different protective relaying planes facilitates the 2000, he worked for Itec Engineering, Florida Power and Light, and Siemens.
analysis of relaying element operation (in particular, In 2000, Mr. Calero joined Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. and
presently is a senior automation systems engineer.
of the multiphase polarized distance elements) during
power system events. Héctor J. Altuve Ferrer received his BSEE degree in 1969 from the Central
University of Las Villas in Santa Clara, Cuba, and his Ph.D. in 1981 from
VIII. REFERENCES Kiev Polytechnic Institute in Kiev, Ukraine. From 1969 until 1993, Dr. Altuve
served on the faculty of the Electrical Engineering School at the Central
[1] C. R. Mason, The Art and Science of Protective Relaying. John Wiley University of Las Villas. From 1993 to 2000, he served as professor of the
and Sons, New York, NY, 1956. Graduate Doctoral Program in the Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
[2] A. R. van C. Warrington, Protective Relays: Their Theory and Practice, School at the Autonomous University of Nuevo León in Monterrey, Mexico.
Vol. 1. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, England, 1962. In 1999 through 2000, he was the Schweitzer Visiting Professor in the
Department of Electrical Engineering at Washington State University.
[3] V. Cook, Analysis of Distance Protection. Research Studies Press Ltd.,
Dr. Altuve joined Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. in January 2001,
Letchworth, England, 1985.
where he is currently a distinguished engineer and director of technology for
[4] H. J. Altuve Ferrer and E. O. Schweitzer, III (eds.), Modern Solutions Latin America. He has authored and coauthored more than 100 technical
for Protection, Control, and Monitoring of Electric Power Systems. papers and several books and holds four patents. His main research interests
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc., Pullman, WA, 2010. are in power system protection, control, and monitoring. Dr. Altuve is an
[5] E. O. Schweitzer, III, “New Developments in Distance Relay IEEE senior member.
Polarization and Fault Type Selection,” proceedings of the 16th Annual
Western Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1989.
[6] E. O. Schweitzer, III and J. Roberts, “Distance Relay Element Design,”
proceedings of the 46th Annual Conference for Protective Relay
Engineers, College Station, TX, April 1993.
© 2011 by Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
All rights reserved.
20110914 • TP6506-01