4 Anastesi
4 Anastesi
4 Anastesi
Complications after blood components still constitute an important clinical problem and serve as
limitation of liberal-transfusion strategy.
The aim of the study was to present the 5-year incidence of early blood transfusions complications
and to assess their relation to the type of the transfused blood components.
Material and methods. 58,505 transfusions of blood components performed in the years 2006-2010
were retrospectively analyzed. Data concerning the amount of the transfused blood components and
the numbers of adverse transfusion reactions reported to the Regional Blood Donation and Treatment
Center (RBDTC) was collected.
Results. 95 adverse transfusion reactions were reportedto RBDTC 0.16% of alldonations (95/58 505) – 58
after PRBC transfusions, 28 after platelet concentrate transfusions and 9 after FFP transfusion. Febrile
nonhemolytic and allergic reactions constitute respectively 36.8% and 30.5% of all complications.
Conclusion. Nonhemolyticand allergic reactions are the most common complications of blood compo-
nents transfusion and they are more common after platelet concentrate transfusions in comparison to
PRBC and FFP donations.
Key words: blood components, transfusions, complications
In the last decades new screening proce- (HTLV)-1 and -2, West Nile virus, Treponema
dures and tests were implemented to improve pallidum (syphilis), Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas
the safety of blood transfusions. However be- disease), and cytomegalovirus (CMV). Other
cause of the most recent risks and threats, a infectious threats include Babesia, Plasmodi-
zero-risk blood supply is still nearly impossible ums (malaria), prions (variant Creutzfeldt-
(1). Transfusion complications can be catego- Jakob disease), hepatitis A virus and human
rized into infectious and noninfectious: im- herpes virus 8. Although various methods of
munologic and non-immunologic. The risk of pathogen inactivation are under investigation
infections cannot be eliminated completely, their efficacy and effect on the quality of blood
because of window periods during which patho- products need to be determined (3).
gens are not detectable and because of the risk Bacterial infections (TTBI) also create an
of new pathogens emerging (2). Currently, infec- important issue in blood transfusions.The in-
tious agents for which donated blood can be cidence of TTBI is higher than the incidence
tested include hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HBC), of transfusion transmitted viral infection (4,
HIV-1 and -2, human T-cell lymphotropic virus 5, 6). Many studies showed that the most com-
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/26/18 3:55 PM
Analysis of complications after blood components’ transfusions 167
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/26/18 3:55 PM
168 D. Timler et al.
promised recipients, most cell concentrates than platelet concentrates. There was a statis-
were irradiated in order to minimize the risk tically significant correlation between the fre-
of TA-GvHD. quency of early transfusion complications and
Of the 58,505 transfused blood components, the type of blood component used in the five-
68.96% (40 348/58 505) were PRBC and 13.22% year observation period. Significantly higher
(7 734/58 505) were platelet concentrate incidence of adverse transfusion reactions was
preparations. Platelet preparations were ob- observed after platelet preparations than for
tained with two methods – by apheresis or from PRBC (p <0.001) and FFP transfusions (p
buffy coat with ORBISAK apparatus. The re- <0.001), as shown in tab. 1.
maining 17.82% (10 423/58 505) were plasma From early adverse transfusion reactions
transfusions. we observed: febrile non-hemolytic reactions,
Inthe event of an adverse transfusion reac- allergic reactions, anti-HLA antibodies produc-
tion, a procedure in accordance with thehospi- tion, symptoms such as pulmonary edema,
tal standards designed on the basis of the shortness of breath, heart failure, transfusion
Minister of Health Regulation was under- of AB0-incompatible blood components and in
taken – documentation and patient blood one patient we observed symptoms, suggesting
sampleas well as the transfused blood sample bacterial complication. After PRBC transfu-
were provided to the Regional Centre. Among sions, the most common complications (22
the adverse transfusion reactions, only early cases) were febrile non-hemolytic reactions.
reactions that can be detected during hospi- More rarely the cause of adverse PRBC reaction
talization, were noted. were anti-HLA antibodies produced by the pa-
tient (12 cases) and allergic reactions (12 cases).
Platelet concentration transfusions caused al-
Statistical Analysis lergic reactions more often (12 cases) than the
febrile non-hemolytic reactions (11 cases). Only
To seek the relationship between the data, in 4 cases the transfusion reaction involved the
chi2 test of independence was used. The thresh- production of anti-HLA antibodies in the re-
old for statistical significance was the value of cipient. Allergic reactions were the most com-
p ≤0.05. mon cause of reactions after FFP transfusions
and occurred in 5 patients. There was one case
of transfusion of an AB0-incompatible blood
Results component. FFP group 0 was transfused to a
group B recipient. There were no symptoms
Annually,approximately 9000 units of associated with the effect of the transfused
PRBC, 2,000 platelet donations and 3,000 FFP anti-B antibodies to the recipient red blood cells.
donations were transfused in the hospital. On Statistical analysis of the incidence of complica-
average, 20 adverse transfusion reactions were tions in relation to the type of blood components
reported each year. Five-year analysis of data showed that platelet concentration transfusions
on early transfusion complications showed that were associated with a significantly higher risk
in the years 2006-2010, 95 adverse transfusion of developing a febrile non-hemolytic reaction
reactions were reported to RBDTC – 58 after and allergic reaction, as compared with PRBC
PRBC transfusions, 28 after platelet concen- (p<0.01 and p<0.001) and FFP transfusions
trate transfusions and 9 after FFP transfusion. (p<0.001 and p<0.05). Platelet concentration
In relation to the total number of the trans- transfusions significantly more often caused
fused blood components, adverse reactions HLA antibodies production, as compared to
were reported after 0.16% of all donations FFP administration (p<0.05) (tab. 2).
(95/58 505). Most complications occurred after Department of Hematology transfused the
platelet concentration transfusions and con- largest amounts of blood components. Within
cerned approximately 0.36% of cases. Although the analyzed 5 years, transfusions on this ward
complications after PRBC transfusions oc- accounted for approximately 34% (19 900/58
curred only in 0.14% of cases, they constituted 505) of all blood components transfused in the
the largest group of reactions reported to RB- Copernicus Memorial Hospital. Transfusions
DTC due to the overall number of transfusions in the Department of Hematology accounted
– PRBC were transfused 5 times more often for almost 30% (11 997/40 348) of PRBC trans-
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/26/18 3:55 PM
Analysis of complications after blood components’ transfusions 169
chi2 significance
p<0,001
p<0,001
p<0,001
p>0,05
p>0,05
p>0,05
p>0,05
p<0,05
p<0,05
p>0,05
p>0,05
p>0,05
approximately 9.92% (1 034/10 423)
PC – FFP
PC – FFP
of all FFP transfusion. The number
of adverse reactions in the Depart-
13,228
16,593
11,825
2,602
1,817
0,985
2,230
5,452
5,392
0,710
0,742
ment of Hematology in this period
-
accounted to 54, which constituted
Statistical analysis
p>0,05
p>0,05
p>0,05
p>0,05
p<0,05
p>0,05
PRBC – FFP
PRBC – FFP
3,692
0,823
3,105
1,096
3,874
0,260
matology Department. However, the
Table 2. Analysis of adverse transfusion reactions frequency in relation to blood component
17,322 p<0,001
p<0,001
p>0,05
p>0,05
p>0,05
p<0,01
p>0,05
p>0,05
p>0,05
p>0,05
PRBC – PC
PRBC – PC
0,15 8,478
0,17 0,144
0,09 2,949
5,26 20,463
1,05 7,280
0,940
1,05 0,001
FFP
n
22 23,16 11 11,58 1
12 12,63 12 12,63 5
0
1
1
0
n
Blood components
Note: n – number, PRBC – Packed Red Blood Cells, PC – Platelet Concentrate, FFP – Fresh Frozen Plasma
Note: n – number, PRBC – Packed Red Blood Cells, PC – Platelet Concentrate, FFP – Fresh Frozen Plasma
0
0
PC
FFP
12 12,63 4
11 11,58 2
0
0
1
4
2
2
9
-
0
1
15
60
n
40348
7369
7256
8276
8464
8983
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/26/18 3:55 PM
170 D. Timler et al.
Discussion
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/26/18 3:55 PM
Analysis of complications after blood components’ transfusions 171
Table 3. Comparison of adverse transfusion reactions in relation to type of blood component and department
on which the transfusion had place
Statistical analysis
Departments PRBC PC FFP Total
chi2 significance chi2 significance chi2 significance chi2 significance
Internal Medicine vs Surgery 8,582 p<0,01 1,597 p>0,05 2,422 p>0,05 16,615 p<0,001
Internal Medicine vs Oncologic 0,002 p>0,05 0,154 p>0,05 0,327 p>0,05 0,003 p>0,05
Surgery
Internal Medicine vs Emergency 0,219 p>0,05 0,071 p>0,05 0,723 p>0,05 1,140 p>0,05
Department
Internal Medicine vs Oncology 2,999 p>0,05 0,063 p>0,05 0,000 p>0,05 3,953 p<0,05
Internal Medicine vs Intensive Care 0,001 p>0,05 0,990 p>0,05 4,645 p<0,05 2,515 p>0,05
Medicine
Hematology vs Surgery 7,199 p<0,01 1,518 p>0,05 3,807 p>0,05 17,534 p<0,001
Hematology vs Oncologic Surgery 0,001 p>0,05 0,157 p>0,05 0,032 p>0,05 0,031 p>0,05
Hematology vs Emergency 0,193 p>0,05 0,073 p>0,05 1,003 p>0,05 1,258 p>0,05
Department
Hematology vs Oncology 2,656 p>0,05 0,074 p>0,05 0,083 p>0,05 4,409 p<0,05
Hematology vs Intensive Care 0,002 p>0,05 0,944 p>0,05 6,441 p<0,05 2,880 p>0,05
Medicine
Surgery vs Emergency Department 0,168 p>0,05 0,176 p>0,05 0,252 p>0,05 0,003 p>0,05
Surgery vs Oncology 0,027 p>0,05 0,990 p>0,05 0,960 p>0,05 0,269 p>0,05
Surgery vs Intensive Care Medicine 3,502 p>0,05 0,040 p>0,05 1,624 p>0,05 0,751 p>0,05
Oncologic Surgery vs Emergency 0,157 p>0,05 0,000 p>0,05 1,180 p>0,05 0,901 p>0,05
Department
Oncologic Surgery vs Oncology 1,223 p>0,05 0,119 p>0,05 0,166 p>0,05 1,666 p>0,05
Oncologic Surgery vs Intensive Care 0,001 p>0,05 0,408 p>0,05 7,575 p<0,01 1,038 p>0,05
Medicine
Emergency Department vs Oncology 0,094 p>0,05 0,055 p>0,05 0,719 p>0,05 0,059 p>0,05
Emergency Department vs Intensive 0,188 p>0,05 0,190 p>0,05 0,000 p>0,05 0,149 p>0,05
Care Medicine
Oncology vs Intensive Care Medicine 1,831 p>0,05 0,858 p>0,05 4,622 p<0,05 0,081 p>0,05
Internal Medicine without 0,069 p>0,05 0,540 p>0,05 0,706 p>0,05 0,591 p>0,05
Hematology vs Hematology
Surgery without Oncologic Surgery vs 2,676 p>0,05 0,233 p>0,05 6,456 p<0,05 5,806 p<0,05
Oncologic Surgery
Internal Medicine without 7,410 p<0,01 1,601 p>0,05 0,760 p>0,05 7,093 p<0,01
Hematology vs Surgery without
Oncologic Surgery
Note: n – number, PRBC – Packed Red Blood Cells, PC – Platelet Concentrate, FFP – Fresh Frozen Plasma
adverse transfusion reactions after platelet group 0 was transfused to a group B recipient.
concentrate transfusions in comparison to We did not observed any symptoms associated
PRBC and FFP donations. with the effect of the transfused anti-B anti-
Delayed hemolytic reactions occurrence is bodies to the recipient red blood cells. The only
estimated for approximately 1 out of 1000 to detectable reaction was positive direct anti-
1 out of 9000 RBC units transfused while acute globulin test, persisting for several days after
hemolytic reactions due to AB0-incompatible the transfusion.
blood resulting from transfusion errors is ob- Although non-infectious complications of
served in approximately 1:30,000 transfusions. blood transfusion are considerably more com-
According to the SHOT 2010 report, 345 criti- mon and according to the SHOT 2010 report
cal transfusion errors occurred per 1 million no transfusion-transmitted infection was de-
units of blood component issued (11). In our tected, such risk needs to be mentioned. The
material there was one case of transfusion of incidence of bacterial contamination is much
an AB0-incompatible blood component. FFP higher in case of platelets donations while
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/26/18 3:55 PM
172 D. Timler et al.
minimal for RBC units (10). Such complica- (TRALI) and nearly zero per million units for
tions may result from the fact that the stan- the rest (11).
dard procedure for blood preparation cannot To sum up, it can be seen from the study
eliminate the risk completely, because of that non-hemolytic and allergic reactions are
pathogens window periods and some new the most common complications of blood com-
pathogens emerging. In our analysis, we sus- ponents transfusion and they are more com-
pected transfusion-transmitted bacterial infec- mon after platelet concentrate transfusions in
tion in one patient after PRBC donation. comparison to PRBC and FFP donations. Al-
Complications such as: transfusion-associ- though strict procedures are applied during
ated acute lung injury (TRALI), post-transfu- blood donations preparations and transfusions,
sion purpura, acute hemolytic reactions, ana- errors in transfusion and infection complica-
phylactic shock, septic shock did not occur in tions still serve a problem in clinical practice.
our patients. This observation is consistent We also found that the Department of Hema-
with the data presented in the literature as tology is leading in the number oft ransfusions
such complications are rare: 20 per 1 million performed, with the highest rate of early ad-
units (hemolytic reactions), 5 per million units verse transfusion reactions.
references
1. Goodnough LT, Shander A: Risks and Compli- 12. Glance LG, Dick AW, Mukamel DB et al.: As-
cations of Blood Transfusions: Optimizing Outco- sociation between intraoperative blood transfusion
mes for Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced and mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing
Anemia. Adv Stud Med 2008; 8: 357-62. noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 283-
2. Shander A: Emerging risks and outcomes of 92.
blood transfusion in surgery. Semin Hematol 2004; 13. Juffermans NP, Prins DJ, Vlaar AP et al.:
41: 117-24. Transfusion-related risk of secondary bacterial
3. Webert KE, Cserti CM, Hannon J et al.: Proce- infections in sepsis patients: a retrospective cohort
edings of a Consensus Conference: pathogen inac- study. Shock 2011; 35: 355-59.
tivation-making decisions about new technologies. 14. Salvin JW, Scheurer MA, Laussen PC et al.:
Transfus Med Rev 2008; 22: 1-34. Blood transfusion after pediatric cardiac surgery
4. Vasconcelos E, Seghatchian J: Bacterial conta- is associated with prolonged hospital stay. Ann
mination in blood components and preventative Thorac Surg 2011; 91: 204-10.
strategies: an overview. Transfus Apher Sci 2004; 15. Nuis RJ, Van Mieghem NM, Tzikas A et al.:
31: 155. Frequency, determinants, and prognostic effects of
5. Goodnough LT, Shander A, Brecher ME: Trans- acute kidney injury and red blood cell transfusion
fusion medicine: looking to the future. Lancet 2003; in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve
361: 161. implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 77:
6. Jacobs MR, Palavecino E, Yomtovian R: Don't 881-89.
bug me: the problem of bacterial contamination of 16. Chau JK, Harris JR, Seikaly HR: Transfusion
blood components--challenges and solutions. Trans- as a predictor of recurrence and survival in head
fusion 2001; 41: 1331. and neck cancer surgery patients. J Otolaryngol
7. Brojer E: Czynniki zakaźne przenoszone przez Head Neck Surg 2010; 39: 516-22.
krew. OINPHARMA, Warszawa 2008. 17. Möhnle P, Snyder-Ramos SA, Miao Y et al.:
8. Hillyer CD, Josephson CD, Blajchman MA et al.: Postoperative red blood cell transfusion and morbid
Bacterial contamination of blood components: risks, outcome in uncomplicated cardiac surgery patients.
strategies, and regulation: joint ASH and AABB Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 97-109.
educational session in transfusion medicine. He- 18. Wu WC, Smith TS, Henderson WG et al.: Ope-
matology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2003; rative blood loss, blood transfusion, and 30-day
575-89. mortality in older patients after major noncardiac
9. Dodd RY: Current risk fortransfusion transmitted surgery. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 11-17.
infections. Curr Opin Hematol 2007; 14: 671-76. 19. Hearnshaw SA, Logan RF, Palmer KR et al.:
10. Shander A: Anemia in the critically ill. Crit Outcomes following early red blood cell transfusion
Care Clin 2004; 20: 159-78. in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment
11. Knowles S, Cohen H, on behalf of the Serious Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 215-24.
Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) Steering Group. 20. Veenith T, Sharples L, Gerrard C et al.: Survi-
The 2010 Annual SHOT Report, 2011. val and length of stay following blood transfusion
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/26/18 3:55 PM
Analysis of complications after blood components’ transfusions 173
in octogenarians following cardiac surgery. Ana- sion after cardiac surgery depends on the amount
esthesia 2010; 65: 331-36. of transfusion. J Surg Res 2010; 158: 20-27.
21. Pedersen AB, Mehnert F, Overgaard S et al.: 24. Barrett NA, Kam PC: Transfusion-related acu-
Allogeneic blood transfusion and prognosis following te lung injury: a literature review. Anaesthesia
total hip replacement: a population-based follow up 2006; 61: 777-85
study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009; 10: 167. 25. Shander A, Popovsky MA: Understanding the
22. vanStraten AH, Bekker MW, Soliman Hamad consequences of transfusion-relatedacute lung in-
MA et al.: Transfusion of red blood cells: the impact jury. Chest 2005; 128: 598S-604S
on short-term and long-term survival after corona- 26. Shander A, Javidroozi M, Ozawa S et al.: What
ry artery bypass grafting, a ten-year follow-up. is really dangerous: anaemia or transfusion? Br J
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10: 37-42. Anaesth 2011; 107: 41-59.
23. Whitson BA, Huddleston SJ, Savik K et al.: Risk 27. Goodnough LT: Risks of blood transfusion.
of adverse outcomes associated with blood transfu- Anesthesiol Clin North America 2005; 23: 241-52.
Received: 4.02.2015 r.
Adress correspondence: 90-153 Łódź, ul. Kopcińskiego 22
e-mail: [email protected]
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/26/18 3:55 PM