GEQ1000 Engineering Transcript 1 1 Introduction To Engineering
GEQ1000 Engineering Transcript 1 1 Introduction To Engineering
Engineering Segment
Lecture 1.1
Introduction to Engineering
Engineering as Problem Solving
Hello students, I am Prof. Seah Kar Heng from the Department of Mechanical
Engineering.
And I am A/P Karina Gin from the Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering.
In this segment, we shall focus on how we, engineers, think. In particular, we shall
examine how engineers ask questions as they go about solving the problems of
humanity.
In other words, engineers are like practical scientists, who put into reality what the
pure scientist or mathematician conceives and formulates.
For example, Sir Isaac Newton discovered the laws of motion. Each law that Newton
discovered has endless engineering applications. Many engineers have since
applied these laws of motion by designing and constructing moving objects like
vehicles, ships, aeroplanes, space craft, etc. The laws of motion are even applicable
in the nano sciences, governing the movement of tiny objects like electrons. It
requires a questioning mind to figure out whether certain desired gadgets and
machines are possible, given the present state of resources.
These applications are never static. They are ever-evolving as we come to learn
more and more about our physical world.
1
At the heart of it all, engineering is a problem-solving discipline. If you come to an
engineer with a problem, he will try to design and create a solution for you. No
problem is too big or too small – or microscopic even – for us to solve.
Now, let us pause here for a bit. In general, all human beings are problem solvers.
We solve problems all the time, whether or not we are engineers. Figuring out how to
get from Point A to Point B is a problem we solve regularly. And we don’t need to go
through four years in the Faculty of Engineering to solve it.
If that’s the case, what’s so special, what’s so unique about the engineering mode of
problem solving?
Let us first focus on the kinds of problems engineers deal with. Engineers are
typically engaged to solve multi-faceted problems. What seems to be a single
problem may in fact turn out to be a problem that requires satisfying several different
criteria at the same time.
The creation of a Mass Rapid Transport system in Singapore may seem like a single
problem. But if we look at it closely, it is a multi-faceted problem. The limited land
available in Singapore means that engineers have to find alternatives for placing the
tracks and stations. They have to solve problems related to the construction of
underground tunnels: how to dig tunnels underground without causing damage to the
structures above, and without disrupting traffic and the livelihoods of people in the
vicinity. Other than that, the engineers have to solve other problems like how to
deliver electricity to trains in an efficient and safe manner, and how to build stations
that aren’t just safe, but also convenient for passengers to access.
There are also many sources of constraints, the most obvious being a finite amount
of time, money, and material resources allocated to solve the problem. The engineer
will need to minimize waste while fully utilizing the limited resources at hand. The
engineer is also limited by the laws of nature as well as the laws and regulations of
the state. Every potential solution will present both a set of benefits and costs. The
engineer must also solve the problem in a way that caters to the desires of the client.
It is often the case that these multi-faceted problems are also multi-disciplinary in
nature. The creation of better infrastructure, reliable transportation, secure and fast
communications, affordable medical treatments, etc., are not just technical problems.
They profoundly shape the way we live.
No doubt it was a scientist who discovered how electricity flows, but it took an
engineer like Thomas Edison to invent a lightbulb and to find a way to efficiently
mass produce it for everyone to use. We may take the lightbulb for granted today.
2
But back in Edison’s day, the introduction of the lightbulb to homes and streets
meant that many people could continue working and playing longer in the night, even
in places where daylight was scarce. This allowed millions of humans to be more
productive for longer hours. The lightbulb paved the way for new forms of social
interactions where people could meet and engage with one another in new and
meaningful ways.
Here’s another example. Decades ago, engineers were looking to solve the energy
problem: how do we provide more energy at a time when our demand for energy has
grown tremendously? Today, it is obvious that they made use of scientific analyses
on how the sun can convert mass into huge amounts of energy through Einstein’s
famous equation (E = mc2). But before the engineers thought of utilizing such
scientific discoveries, they turned to literature, or more precisely, to science fiction.
Numerous scientific discoveries, like the discovery of radioactivity, fueled the
imagination of so many science fiction authors who envisioned a future where
humanity could harness energy from atoms. It was this seemingly unlikely source
that gave engineers the creative inspiration to attempt such a novel solution of
designing and inventing a nuclear power plant.
However, the problem with living in an imperfect world is that things don’t always go
the way we plan. According to Murphy’s Law, “Anything that can go wrong will go
wrong.” The engineer must devise a solution that pre-empts all the possible ways
that things can go wrong, either with the environment, the people or systems
involved, or with the solution itself.
But there is a limit to what we engineers can do in this regard. We are limited by our
experiences and understanding of the world, and can only do our best to pre-empt all
the known possibilities for failure as well as all the unknown possibilities.
But we must remember that the engineer is constrained by the finite amount of time,
money, and resources available to him. There is only so much that can be done.
Thus, every potential solution that comes to the engineer’s mind must be carefully
considered against the numerous constraints.
The engineer requires a great deal of creativity to “think out of the box” in order to
discover a brilliant solution that overcomes those numerous constraints.
For this reason, in engineering, there is no single “right” answer or perfect solution to
any problem. The engineering mode of problem solving seeks to find the best
possible solution, or the optimal solution that will fit the needs of a multi-faceted
problem constrained by numerous factors.
3
This is an ever-advancing process. So long as there are engineers who are bold
enough to ask questions on how we can “do things better,” there will always be new
engineering inventions. That’s why it is important for engineers to always be creative,
to challenge the status quo, and to ask questions. There is no final perfect answer as
we live in an imperfect and ever-evolving world. But as engineers continue to solve
the many problems of humanity, we will slowly and steadily improve the things
around us to enhance our human experience.