Scribd
Upload
73 views2 pages

Solutions To Selected Homework Problems: Written By: Kalin Kostadinov

The document contains solutions to three exercises involving complex variables: 1. It verifies the inequality √2|z| ≥ |Re(z)| + |Im(z)| by squaring both sides and simplifying. 2. It gives geometric arguments that (a) the equation |z - 4i| + |z + 4i| = 10 represents an ellipse with foci at (0, ±4) and (b) the equation |z - 1| = |z + i| represents a line through the origin with slope -1. 3. It factors z^2 - 4z^2 + 3 into quadratic factors and uses an inequality from the textbook to show that if

Uploaded by

Ahmad Raza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
73 views2 pages

Solutions To Selected Homework Problems: Written By: Kalin Kostadinov

The document contains solutions to three exercises involving complex variables: 1. It verifies the inequality √2|z| ≥ |Re(z)| + |Im(z)| by squaring both sides and simplifying. 2. It gives geometric arguments that (a) the equation |z - 4i| + |z + 4i| = 10 represents an ellipse with foci at (0, ±4) and (b) the equation |z - 1| = |z + i| represents a line through the origin with slope -1. 3. It factors z^2 - 4z^2 + 3 into quadratic factors and uses an inequality from the textbook to show that if

Uploaded by

Ahmad Raza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Spring Term 2008 MA412 Complex Variables

Boston University prof. T. Kaper

Solutions to Selected Homework Problems


written by: Kalin Kostadinov

√
Exercise 1. Verify that 2|z| ≥ |Re(z)| + |Im(z)|.
p
Let z = x + iy be an arbitrary complex number. Then |z| = x2 + y 2 ,
and we have to show that
√ p
2 x2 + y 2 ≥ |x| + |y|

Since both parts of this inequality are non-negative, squaring it produces the
equivalent inequality

2(x2 + y 2 ) ≥ x2 + y 2 + 2|x| · |y|

which readily simplifies to

(|x| − |y|)2 ≥ 0

The last one is always true, so we are done.


We remark that equality is reached precisely when |x| = |y|, i.e. when arg z
is of the form (2k + 1) π4 .
Note that the inequality we proved has a geometric interpretation as well:
It says that in an
√ arbitrary right triangle, the sum of the length of the legs
never surpasses 2 times the length of the hypotenuses.

Exercise 2. Using the fact that |z1 − z2 | is the distance between two points
z1 and z2 , give a geometric argument that
(a) |z − 4i| + |z + 4i| = 10 represents an ellipse whose foci are (0, ±4);
(b) |z − 1| = |z + i| represents the line through the origin whose slope is −1.

Solution: An ellipse is the set of points in the plane whose sum of distances
to two fixed points in the plane (called foci of the ellipse) is constant. The
equation in (a) describes the set of points z in the complex plane such that
the sum of distances from each such point to the points z1 = 4i and z2 = −4i
is 10, a constant. So the set is the ellipse whose foci are (0, ±4).
For part (b) note that the set of point equidistant from two points in the
plane is a line that goes through the middle of the segment bounded by
the points and perpendicular to that segment (the so called perpendicular
Spring Term 2008 MA412 Complex Variables
Boston University prof. T. Kaper

bisector.
Hence the equation |z − 1| = |z + i| describes the perpendicular bisector of
the segment bounded by the points z1 = 1 = (1, 0) and z2 = −i = (0, −1).
Recall that the slopes of perpendicular lines multiply to −1 and notice that
the slope of the line through 1 and i is 1. So the slope of the perpendicular
bisector is −1, as was to be shown.

Exercise 3. By factoring z 2 − 4z 2 + 3 into two quadratic factors and then


using inequality (8), Sec. (4), show that if z lies on the circle |z| = 2, then

1 1
z 4 − 4z 2 + 3 ≤ 3

Solution: First we use a little algebra and the fact that the absolute value
of a quotient equals the quotient of absolute values to transform the given
inequality into
|z 4 − 4z 2 + 3| ≥ 3
Then we factor the Left Hand Side (LHS) to get

|z 2 − 1| · |z 2 − 3| ≥ 3 (∗)

Now we use inequality (8) on page 10 in the textbook:

|z1 − z2 | ≥ | |z1 | − |z2 | |,

to transform the LHS of (*):

|z 2 − 1| · |z 2 − 3| ≥ | |z|2 − |1| | · | |z|2 − |3| | = |22 − 1| · |22 − 3| = 3 ≥ 3,

where for the first equality we used that |z| = 2.


This establishes the given inequality.

You might also like