Tugas Kelompok

Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Instrumen Pengembangan

Dosen Pengampu: Mutmainnah, S.Pd., M.Pd.

NURUL AMALIA ARI / H04 17 010

WIDYA INDAH LESTARI ACO / H0417 017

NURSIAH / H04 17 334

Kelas B

PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN FISIKA

FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN

UNIVERSITAS SULAWESI BARAT

2019
II. CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING
[4] J.J. Clement, Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics, Am. J. Phys. 50, 66
(1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics (Prasangka siswa dalam
mekanika pengantar).
[5] L.C. McDermott, Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics, Phys. Today 37, 24
(1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics (Penelitian tentang
pemahaman konseptual dalam mekanika)
[6] Proceedings of the International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics,
edited by H. Helm and J. D. Novak (Department of Education, Cornell University, Ithaca,
NY, 1983) Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics. Proceedings of the
International Seminar (Kesalahpahaman dalam Sains dan Matematika. Prosiding Seminar
Internasional.)
[7] Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational
Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Vols. I, II, and III, edited by J. D. Novak
(Department of Education, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1987). Misconceptions and
Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Proceedings of the International
Seminar (Kesalahpahaman dan Strategi Pendidikan dalam Sains dan Matematika.
Prosiding Seminar Internasional)
[8] S. Flores-Garcia, L. L. Alfaro-Avena, J. E. Chavez-Pierce, J. Luna-Gonzalez, and M. D.
Gonzalez-Quezada, Students’ difficulties with tension in massless strings, Am. J. Phys. 78,
1412 (2010). Students’ difficulties with tension in massless strings (Siswa mengalami
kesulitan dengan ketegangan dalam ikatan tanpa massa).
[9] R. A. Streveler, T. A. Litzinger, R. L. Miller, and P. S.Steif, Learning conceptual knowledge
in the engineeringsciences: Overview and future research directions, J. Eng. Educ. 97, 279
(2008). Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research (Narasumber: PER-1:
Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika).
[10] L. C. McDermott and E. F. Redish, Resource letter:PER-1: Physics education research,
Am. J. Phys. 67, 755 (1999). Learning Conceptual Knowledge in the Engineering
Sciences: Overview and Future Research Directions (Belajar Pengetahuan Konseptual
dalam Ilmu Teknik: Tinjauan dan Arah Penelitian Masa Depan)
[11] B. S. Ambrose, P. R. L. Heron, S. Vokos, and L. C. McDermott, Student understanding
of light as an electromagnetic wave: Relating the formalism to physical phenomena, Am. J.
Phys. 67, 891 (1999). Student understanding of light as an electromagnetic wave:
Relating the formalism to physical phenomena (Pemahaman siswa tentang cahaya
sebagai gelombang elektromagnetik: Menghubungkan formalisme dengan fenomena fisik).
[12] L. C. McDermott and P. S. Shaffer, Research as a guide for curriculum development: An
example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding, Am.
J. Phys. 60, 994 (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example
from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding
(Penelitian sebagai panduan untuk pengembangan kurikulum: Contoh dari pengantar listrik.
Bagian I: Investigasi pemahaman siswa).
[13] R. J. Beichner, Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs, Am. J. Phys. 62, 750
(1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs (Menguji interpretasi siswa
grafik kinematika).
[14] D. Hestenes and M. Wells, A mechanics baseline test, Phys. Teach. 30, 159 (1992). A
mechanics baseline test (Tes dasar mekanik).
[15] D. Hestenes, M. Wells, and G. Swackhamer, Force Concept Inventory, Phys. Teach. 30,
141 (1992). Force concept inventory (Memaksa persediaan konsep).
[16] D. P. Maloney, T. L. O’Kuma, C. J. Hieggelke, and A. Van Heuvelen, Surveying students’
conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism, Am. J. Phys. 69, S12 (2001).
Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism (Survei
pengetahuan konseptual siswa tentang listrik dan magnet).
[17] R. K. Thornton and D. R. Sokoloff, Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The
Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory
and Lecture Curricula, Am. J. Phys. 66, 338 (1998). Assessing student learning of
Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of
Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula (Menilai pembelajaran siswa
tentang hukum Newton: The Force and Motion Evaluasi Konseptual dan Evaluasi
Laboratorium Pembelajaran Aktif dan Kurikulum Kuliah).
[18] M.T.H. Chi and J.D. Slotta, The ontological coherence of intuitive physics, Cognit. Instr.
10, 249 (1993). The Ontological Coherence of Intuitive Physics (Koherensi Ontologis
Fisika Intuitif).
[19] M.T.H. Chi, J.D. Slotta, and N. de Leeuw, From things to processes: A theory of
conceptual change for learning science concepts, Learn. Instr. 4, 27 (1994). From things to
processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts (Dari hal-hal ke
proses: Sebuah teori perubahan konseptual untuk belajar konsep sains).
[20] A.A. diSessa, N. Gillespie, and J. Esterly, Coherence vs. fragmentation in the development
of the concept of force, Cogn. Sci. 28, 843 (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the
development of the concept of force (Koherensi versus fragmentasi dalam pengembangan
konsep kekuatan).
[21] A. Gupta, D. Hammer, and E.F. Redish, The case for dynamic models of learners’
ontologies in physics, J. Learn. Sci. 19, 285 (2010). The Case for Dynamic Models of
Learners' Ontologies in Physics (Kasus untuk Model Dinamik Ontologi Pembelajar dalam
Fisika).
[22] C. Ioannides and S. Vosniadou, The changing meanings of force, Cognit. Sci. Q. 2, 5
(2002). The chaning meaning of force (perubahan makna kekuatan).
[23] J.D. Slotta, M.T.H. Chi, and E. Joram, Assessing students’ misclassifications of physics
concepts: An ontological basis for conceptual change, Cognit. Instr. 13, 373 (1995).
Assessing Students' Misclassifications of Physics Concepts: An Ontological Basis for
Conceptual Change (Menilai Kesalahan Konsep Konsep Fisika Siswa: Suatu Dasar
Ontologis untuk Perubahan Konseptual).
[24] G. Chiou and O. R. Anderson, A study of undergraduate physics students’ understanding
of heat conduction based on mental model theory and an ontology-process analysis, Sci.
Educ. 94, 825 (2010). A study of undergraduate physics students’ understanding of heat
conduction based on mental model theory and an ontology-process analysis (Sebuah
studi pemahaman mahasiswa fisika fisika tentang konduksi panas berdasarkan teori model
mental dan analisis ontologi-proses).
[25] K.N. Dunbar, J.A. Fugeslsang, and C. Stein, in Thinking with Data, edited by M.C. Lovett
and P. Shah (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2007), pp. 197–205. Thinking with data (Berpikir
dengan data).
[26] C. Camp and J. Clement, Preconceptions in Mechanics: Lessons Dealing with Students’
Conceptual Difficulties (Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque, IA, 1994). Preconceptions in
Mechanics: Lessons Dealing with Students' Conceptual Difficulties (Prasangka dalam
Mekanika: Pelajaran Berurusan dengan Kesulitan Konseptual Siswa).
[27] L.C. McDermott, P.S. Shaffer, and The Physics Education Group at the University of
Washington, Tutorials in Introductory Physics (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ,
2002). Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Physics Education Research—The Key to
Student Learning” (Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika — Kunci
Belajar Siswa”)
[28] J. Slotta and M.T.H. Chi, Helping students understand challenging topics in science
through ontology training, Cognit. Instr. 24, 261 (2006). Helping Students Understand
Challenging Topics in Science Through Ontology Training (Membantu Siswa
Memahami Topik yang Menantang dalam Sains Melalui Pelatihan Ontologi).
[29] D.R. Sokoloff and R.K. Thornton, in Proceedings of ICUPE, edited by E.F. Redish and
J.S. Rigden (American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, 1997), pp. 1061–1074. Synthesis
of discipline-based education research in physics (Sintesis penelitian pendidikan berbasis
disiplin dalam fisika).
[30] M.S. Steinberg and C.L. Wainwright, Using models to teach electricity—The CASTLE
project, Phys. Teach. 31, 353 (1993). Using models to teach electricity—The CASTLE
project (Menggunakan model untuk mengajarkan listrik — Proyek CASTLE).
[31] K. Wosilait, P.R.L. Heron, P.S. Shaffer, and L.C. McDermott, Development and
assessment of a research-based tutorial on light and shadow, Am. J. Phys. 66, 906 (1998).
Development and assessment of a research-based tutorial on light and shadow
(Pengembangan dan penilaian tutorial berbasis penelitian tentang cahaya dan bayangan).
[32] E.D. Corpuz and N.S. Rebello, Investigating students’ mental models and knowledge
construction of microscopic friction. II. Implications for curriculum design and
development, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020103 (2011). Investigating students’
mental models and knowledge construction of microscopic friction. II. Implications for
curriculum design and development (Menyelidiki model mental dan konstruksi
pengetahuan siswa tentang gesekan mikroskopis. II Implikasi untuk desain dan
pengembangan kurikulum).
[33] G. Posner, K. Strike, P. Hewson, and W. Gerzog, Accommodation of a scientific
conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change, Sci. Educ. 66, 211 (1982).
 Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change†
(Akomodasi konsepsi ilmiah: Menuju teori perubahan konseptual†).
[34] E. Etkina, J. Mestre, and A. O’Donnell, in The Cognitive Revolution in Educational
Psychology, edited by J.M. Royer (Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, 2005), pp.
119–164. Transfer and conceptual change: the change process from the theoretical
perspectives of coordination classes and phenomenological primitives (Transfer dan
perubahan konseptual: proses perubahan dari perspektif teoretis kelas koordinasi dan
primitif fenomenologis).
[35] J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind,
Experience, and School (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999). Learning:
From Speculation to Science (Belajar: Dari Spekulasi ke Sains).
[36] S. Carey, in Conceptual Development: Piaget’s Legacy, edited by E.K. Scholnick, K.
Nelson, and P. Miller (Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Mahwah, NJ, 1999), pp. 293–326. Tech
Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy (Tech Tally: Pendekatan untuk
Menilai Literasi Teknologi)
[37] G.M. Sinatra and P.R. Pintrich, in Intentional Conceptual Change, edited by G.M. Sinatra
and P.R. Pintrich (Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Mahwah, NJ, 2003), pp. 1–18. Intentional
Conceptual Change (Perubahan Konseptual yang Disengaja).
[38] K.A. Strike and G.J. Posner, Conceptual change and science teaching, Eur. J. Sci. Educ.
4, 231 (1982). Conceptual change and science teaching (Perubahan konseptual dan
pengajaran sainsDeutsch).
[39] K.A. Strike and G.J. Posner, in Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and
Educational Theory and Practice, edited by R.A. Duschl and R.J. Hamilton (State University
of New York Press, New York, 1992), pp. 147–176. Conceptual change and the learning
of history (Perubahan konseptual dan pembelajaran sejarah).
[40] A.A. diSessa, Toward an epistemology of physics, Cognit. Instr. 10, 105 (1993). Toward
an Epistemology of Physics (Menuju Epistemologi Fisika)
[41] A.A. diSessa and B.L. Sherin, What changes in conceptual change? Int. J. Sci. Educ. 20,
1155 (1998). What changes in conceptual change? (Apa perubahan dalam perubahan
konseptual?)
[42] D. Hammer, Misconceptions or p-prims: How might alternative perspectives on cognitive
structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions, J. Learn. Sci. 5, 97 (1996).
Misconceptions or P-Prims: How May Alternative Perspectives of Cognitive Structure
Influence Instructional Perceptions and Intentions (Kesalahpahaman atau P-Prims:
Bagaimana Mungkin Perspektif Alternatif Struktur Kognitif Mempengaruhi Persepsi dan
Niat Instruksional).
[43] Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, A Private Universe, videotape,
http://www.learner.org/resources/ series28.html, retrieved Sept. 15, 2010. a private
universe (alam semesta pribadi).
[44] D. Hammer, Student resources for learning introductory physics, Am. J. Phys. 68, S52
(2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics (Sumber daya siswa untuk
mempelajari fisika pengantar).
[45] J. Minstrell, in Proceedings of the International
WorkshoponResearchinPhysicsEducation:Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, edited
by R. Duit, F. Goldberg, and H. Niedderer (Institut fur die Padagogik der
Naturwissenschaften, Kiel, Germany, 1992), pp. 110–128. Lernen in den
Naturwissenschaften : Beiträge zu einem Workshop an der Pädagogischen Hochschule
Ludwigsburg (Belajar dalam ilmu alam: kontribusi untuk lokakarya di Universitas
Pendidikan Ludwigsburg).
[46] J. Smith, A. diSessa, and J. Roschelle, Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist
analysis of knowledge in transition, J. Learn. Sci. 3, 115 (1994). Misconceptions
Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition (Kesalahpahaman
yang Dipikirkan Kembali: Sebuah Analisis Pengetahuan Konstruktivis dalam Transisi).
[47] D. Hammer, More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and
reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research, Am. J. Phys. 64, 1316 (1996).
More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and
reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research (Lebih dari kesalahpahaman:
Berbagai perspektif tentang pengetahuan dan penalaran siswa, dan peran yang sesuai untuk
penelitian Pendidikan).
[48] D. Hammer and A. Elby, in Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about
Knowledge and Knowing, edited by B.K. Hofer and P.R. Pintrich (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ,
2002), pp. 169–190. On the Form of a Personal Epistemology (Pada Bentuk Epistemologi
Pribadi).
[49] R.J. Dufresne, W.J. Leonard, and W.J. Gerace, Making sense of students’ answers to
multiple choice questions, Phys. Teach. 40, 174 (2002). Marking sense of students'
answers to multiple-choice questions (Menandai jawaban siswa atas pertanyaan pilihan
ganda).
[50] R.N. Steinberg and M.S. Sabella, Performance on multiple-choice diagnostics and
complementary exam problems, Phys. Teach. 35, 150 (1997). Performance on multiple-
choice diagnostics and complementary exam problems (Kinerja pada diagnostik pilihan
ganda dan masalah ujian pelengkap).
[51] D.E.BrownandD.Hammer,inInternationalHandbookof Research on Conceptual Change,
edited by S. Vosniadou (Routledge, New York, 2008), pp. 127–154. Conceptual Change
in Physics (Perubahan Konseptual dalam Fisika).
[52] M.T.H. Chi, in Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of
Science, edited by R. Giere (University ofMinnesotaPress,Minneapolis,MN,1992), pp. 129–
186. Cognitive Models of Science (Model Ilmu Pengetahuan Kognitif).
[53] M.T.H. Chi, in Conceptual Structures, and Processes: Emergence, Discovery, and Change,
edited by T.B. War, S.M. Smith, and J. Vaid (American Psychological Association,
Washington, DC, 1997), pp. 209–234. An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and
Processes (Investigasi Struktur dan Proses Konseptual).
[54] F.C. Keil, Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective (Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1979). Semantic and Conceptual Development
(Pengembangan Semantik dan Konseptual)
[55] G. Zhu and C. Singh, Improving students’ understanding of quantum measurement. I.
Investigation of difficulties, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010117 (2012). Improving
students’ understanding of quantum measurement. I. Investigation of difficulties
(Meningkatkan pemahaman siswa tentang pengukuran kuantum. I. Investigasi kesulitan).
[56] G. Zhu and C. Singh, Improving students’ understanding of quantum measurement. II.
Development of researchbased learning tools, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010118
(2012). Improving students’ understanding of quantum measurement. II.
Development of research based learning tools (Meningkatkan pemahaman siswa tentang
pengukuran kuantum. II Pengembangan alat pembelajaran berbasis penelitian).
[57] A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA,
1998). Basics of Qualitative Research (Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif).
[58] D. Brown and J. Clement, Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract
transfer versus explanatory model construction, Instr. Sci. 18, 237 (1989). Overcoming
misconceptions via analogical reasoning: abstract transfer versus explanatory model
construction (Mengatasi kesalahpahaman melalui penalaran analog: transfer abstrak versus
konstruksi model penjelas).
[59] J. Clement, Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’
preconceptions in physics, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 30, 1241 (1993). Using bridging analogies
and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics
(Menggunakan analogi penghubung dan intuisi penahan untuk menangani prasangka siswa
dalam fisika).
[60] Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Minds of Our Own: Lessons from Thin
Air, videotape, http://www .learner.org/resources/series26.html, retrieved Sept. 15, 2010.
Minds of Our Own (Pikiran Kita Sendiri).
[61] M.T.H. Chi, Common sense conceptions of emergent
processes:Whysomemisconceptionsarerobust,J.Learn. Sci. 14, 161 (2005). Commonsense
Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust (Konsepsi
Masuk Akal tentang Proses yang Muncul: Mengapa Ada Beberapa Kesalahpahaman Yang
Kuat).
[62] M. Chiu, C. Chou, and C. Liu, Dynamic processes of conceptual changes: Analysis of
constructing mental models of chemical equilibrium, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 39, 688 (2002).
Dynamic processes of conceptual change: Analysis of constructing mental models of
chemical equilibrium (Proses dinamis perubahan konseptual: Analisis membangun model
mental keseimbangan kimia).
[63] D.B. Clark, Longitudinal conceptual change in students’ understanding of thermal
equilibrium: An examination of the process of conceptual restructuring, Cognit. Instr. 24,
467 (2006). Longitudinal Conceptual Change in Students' Understanding of Thermal
Equilibrium: An Examination of the Process of Conceptual Restructuring (Perubahan
 Konseptual Longitudinal dalam Pemahaman Siswa tentang Thermal Equilibrium: Suatu
Pemeriksaan Proses Restrukturisasi Konseptual).
[64] M. Ferrari and M.T.H. Chi, The nature of naïve explanations of natural selection, Int. J.
Sci. Educ. 20, 1231 (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection (Sifat
penjelasan naif seleksi alam).
[65] C. Furio and J. Guisasola, Difficulties in learning the concept of electric field, Sci. Educ.
82, 511 (1998). Difficulties in learning the concept of electric field (Kesulitan dalam
mempelajari konsep medan listrik).

[66] E. Kikas, Teachers’ conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena,
J. Res. Sci. Teach. 41, 432 (2004). Teachers' conceptions and misconceptions concerning
three natural phenomena (Konsepsi dan kesalahpahaman guru tentang tiga fenomena alam).
[67] Y. Lee and N. Law, Explorations inpromoting conceptual change in electrical concepts
via ontological category shift, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 23, 111 (2001). Explorations in promoting
conceptual change in electrical concepts via ontological category shift (Eksplorasi dalam
mempromosikan perubahan konseptual dalam konsep listrik melalui pergeseran kategori
ontologis).
[68] L.M. Tyson, G.J. Venville, A.G. Harrison, and D.F. Treagust, A multidimensional
framework for interpreting conceptual change events in the classroom, Sci. Educ. 81, 387
(1997). A multidimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change events in
the classroom (Kerangka kerja multidimensi untuk menafsirkan peristiwa perubahan
konseptual di kelas).
[69] G.J. Venville and D.F. Treagust, Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a
multidimensional interpretive framework, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 35, 1031 (1998). Exploring
conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework
(Menjelajahi perubahan konseptual dalam genetika menggunakan kerangka kerja
interpretatif multidimensi).
[70] L. Deslauriers and C. Wieman, Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different
teaching methods, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 010101 (2011). Learning and
retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods (Belajar dan retensi
konsep kuantum dengan metode pengajaran yang berbeda).