COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

CE 409

STRUCTURAL THEORY 2

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF FIVE (5) STOREY COMMERICAL BUILDING

1
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4
LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3
CHAPTER 1: PROJECT BACKGROUND……………………………………………………………………………5
1.1 The Project…………………………………………………………………………………………………5
1.2 Project Location…………………………………………………………………………………...……7
1.3 Project Objectives………………………………………………………………………………………7
1.3.1General Objectives……………………………………………………………………..………7
1.3.2Specific Objectives…………………………………………………………………..…………8
1.4 Project Scope and Limitation………………………………………………………………..……8
1.5 Project Development………………………………………………………………………..……….9
CHAPTER 2: DESIGN INPUTS……………………………………………………………………………………….10
2.1 Description of the Structure……………………………………………………………………..10
2.2 Site Data…………………………………………………………………………………………….…….10
2.2.1 Elevation Profile…………………………………………………………………..…………11
2.2.2 Street View…………………………………………………………………………….………11
2.3 Architectural Plans………………………………………………………………………………..…12
2.4 Review of Related Literature…………………………………………………………….……..24
CHAPTER 3: CONSTRAINTS………………………………………………………………………………..………26
3.1 Design Constraints…………………………………………………………………………………..26
3.1.1 Constraints…………………………………………………………………………….………26
CHAPTER 4: DESIGN OF STRUCTURE………………………………………………………………………….27
4.1 Design Methodology………………………………………………………………………………..27
4.2 Geometric Modelling………………………………………………………………….……………27
4.3 Design Loads……………………………………………………………………………………………27
4.3.1 Dead Load…………………………………………………………………………………….28
4.3.2 Live Load………………………………………………………………………………………29
4.3.3 Transverse and Longitudinal Forces……………………………………..………30
4.3.4 Wind Load…………………………………………………………………………….……..34
4.3.5 Earthquakes (Seismic Forces)…………………………………………….…………37
4.4 Structural Analysis……………………………………………………………………..…………..38
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………………………….……….41
5.1 Staad Results……………………………………………………………………………….…………42

2
 LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Front Elevation View of the Building………………………………………………………..………………5
Figure 2: Location of the Project…………………………………………………………………………………………….7
Figure 3: Project Development Process…………………………………………………………………….…………….9
Figure 4: Vicinity Location (source: Google Earth)…………………………………………………….……………10
Figure 5: Elevation Profile………………………………………………………………………………………….………….11
Figure 6: Street View of the Lot…………………………………………………………………………………..………..11
Figure 7: Site Development Plan……………………………………………………………………………………………12
Figure 8: Ground Floor Plan………………………………………………………………………………………….……….13
Figure 9: 2nd Floor Plan………………………………………………………………………………………………………….14
Figure 10: 3rd Floor Plan…………………………………………………………………………………..……………………15
Figure 11: 4th Floor Plan…………………………………………………………………………………………….………….16
Figure 12: 5th Floor Plan………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….17
Figure 13: Roof Plan………………………………………………………………………………………………….………….18
Figure 14: Front Elevation……………………………………………………………………………………….…….……..19
Figure 15: Left Side Elevation………………………………………………………………………………………..……..19
Figure 16: Right Side Elevation…………………………………………………………………………………….……….20
Figure 17: Rear Side Elevation……………………………………………………………………………………..……….20
Figure 18: Cross Section Elevation…………………………………………………………………………..……………21
Figure 19: Longitudinal Section Elevation……………………………………………………………….…………….21
Figure 20: Stair Elevation……………………………………………………………………………...………………………22
Figure 21: Beam Details……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………22
Figure 22: Foundation Plan…………………………………………………………………………………………..………23
Figure 23: Shear Force at Y-axis……………………………………………………………………………………..…….38
Figure 24: Bending Moment at Z – axis………………………………………………………………………………..38
Figure 25: Shear Force at Z- axis…………………………………………………………………………………………..39
Figure 26: Wind Loads……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………..39
Figure 27: Earthquake Loads…………………………………………………………………….………………………….40

3
 CHAPTER 1: PROJECT BACKGROUND

1.1 The Project

A building, or edifice, is a structure with a roof and walls standing more or less
permanently in one place, such as a house or factory. Buildings come in a variety of
sizes, shapes, and functions, and have been adapted throughout history for a wide
number of factors, from building materials available, to weather conditions, land prices,
ground conditions, specific uses, and aesthetic reasons. To better understand the term
building compare the list of nonbuilding structures. (Max J. Egenhofer,2002)

The project aims to develop a structural design of a 5 storey commercial building with a
5 bays in Brgy. Sapang Palay, Municipality of San Jose del Monte, Province of Bulacan.
This building will have a 5 floors with a height elevation of 14. 8 meters. The area of this
infrastructure will have a 31.2 m length and 28.2 m width.

The building will have a decreasing sizes of columns as the building rises for the
efficiency of the material resources and cost. The flooring of this building will be a
concrete slab. And for the roofing of the building the designer plan as a type of 1 whole
shed roof that will cover the entire building. The designer will use National Structural
Code of the Phillipines (2015 Edition) as a guide in this design project.

Figure 1: Front Elevation View of the Building

4
Perspective

5
1.2 Project Location

Figure 2: Location of the Project

The building project will be located at the Brgy. Sapang Palay, Municipality of San Jose del
Monte, Province of Bulacan.

1.3 Project Objectives

1.3.1 General Objectives

The general objectives for this project are to produce a structural reports of a 5 storey
commercial building with a 5 bays which includes: support reaction, elastic diagrams, shear
and moment diagrams, using manual and computer aide methods that will apply the
knowledge and skill of the designer that the designer learned in the course Structural Theory
2.

6
1.3.2 Specific Objectives

1. To design a 5 storey building in accordance with the National Building Code of the
Philippines (2015 Edition).
2. To provide the structural plan and the details of the building structure.
3. To provide the different types of loadings affecting the building with the use of
manual calculation and aid of a computer application.
4. To produce structural reports which includes: support reactions, elastic diagrams,
shear and moment diagrams using manual and computed aide methods.
 Wind Load
 Seismic Load
 Dead Load
 Live Load

1.4 Project Scope and Limitations

The design project coverage should only be as follows:

 Design of different structural members that is cost efficient that suits the client’s
needs.
 Structural design in accordance with the codes and engineering standards.
 The use of STAADPro V8i in the structural analysis.
 Provide structural design drawings and structural member details.

The following are out of the designer’s scope and limitations:

 Project / construction management detailed activites.
 Evaluation of the final output.

7
1.5 Project Development

Figure 3: Project Development Process

8
 CHAPTER 2: DESIGN INPUTS

2.1 Description of the Structure:

The plan layouts are presented in this chapter. The designer consider the design
standards of the National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015. The designer are given a task
for the structural analysis of the Five (5) storey building with 5 bays that shall provide the
following types of load:

 Wind Load
 Seismic Load
 Dead Load
 Live Load
This comes with each different diagrams and tables using the manual calculation and computer
aided methods.
2.2 Site Data
The location of the project is in the Brgy. Of Sapang Palay, Municipality of San Jose del
Monte, Bulacan.

Figure 4: Vicinity Location (Source: Google Earth)

9
2.2.1 Elevation Profile (Figure 5 : Elevation Profile)

2.2.2 Street View

Figure 6: Street view of the lot

10
2.3 Architectural Plans

Figure 7: Site Development Plan

11
Figure 8: Ground Floor Plan

12
Figure 9: 2nd Floor Plan

13
Figure 10: 3rd Floor Plan

14
Figure 11: 4th Floor Plan

15
Figure 12: 5th Floor Plan

16
Figure 13: Roof Plan

17
 Figure 14: Front Elevation

Figure 15: Left Side Elevation

18
Figure 16: Right Side Elevation

Figure 17: Read Side Elevation

19
 Figure 18: Cross Section Elevation

Figure 19: Longitudinal Section Elevation

20
Figure 20: Stair Elevation

Figure 21: Beam Details

21
Figure 22: Foundation Plan

22
2.4 Review of Related Literature/s:

Building designs are increasingly becoming more efficient. To increase design efficiency, light-
weight floor systems utilize components such as joists and composite construction to increase
both strength and span lengths. While strength is not a limiting factor in these floor systems,
serviceability may be compromised. Due to decreased floor mass and longer span lengths, floor
vibrations have become an area of concern. (Allen and Rainer 1975)
Design criteria (Allen and Rainer 1975, Allen 1990b, Murray 1991) are available to help
designers minimize annoying vibrations in floor systems. In general, floors that comply with the
criteria and are used for their original purpose are found to be acceptable to the occupants.
Office and residential settings require different criteria than gymnasia or assembly halls.
Typically, vibrations are induced primarily by walking in office or residential environments, and
partitions and furniture provide damping to the floor system. Gymnasium and dance hall
environments necessitate different criteria due to vibrations induced by rhythmic activities, in
addition to walking, and because of relatively little damping.
Load surveys have always interested structural engineers and their predecessors, the master
builders. An examination of older structures and documents indicates that. The master builders
of the past must have understood, even if only intuitively or empirically, the connection
between loads, forces in members, and structural sizes. This kind of understanding implies a
knowledge of the loads produced by different furnishings and other load items.
Impact and vibrating loads which may be produced by wind gusts, moving furniture, running
children, passing vehicles, etc., may cause unpleasant vibrations to the occupants of a
residence. Long term loads, such as those produced by heavier items (semi permanent
partitions, heavy furniture, pianos, fish tanks, water beds, heavy appliances) may produce
excessive long term permanent deflections in the structure.
Short term heavy loads may be produced in residences when the house is being redecorated
and the furnishings from several rooms are stored in one room or when parties or meetings are
held. Thus, any recommendations for design loads which may be imbedded in codes and design
manuals should include impact, long term deflections, and short term overloading. Analogous
considerations should also be applied to fire loads.
Arvind Y. Vyavahare1, Godbole. P.N2, Trupti Nikose3, 2012, As author study that Tall buildings
are slender flexible structures in nature and require to be examine to settle on the significance
of wind speed induced excitation along and across the path of wind in specific zone . The Indian
codal provision of practice for wind load on any buildings and structures (code IS-875 Part-3
1987) gives a procedure to determine along wind response of tall structures, while the across
wind response and intervention effect are not included in the code at present. A article ‘Review

23
of Indian Wind Code IS 875 (Part 3) 1987’ has been set by IIT Kanpur under GSDMA project
gives recommendations to gain across wind reaction of tall buildings and structure as per
process given in Australian/New Zealand standard ‘Structural Design Actions – Part 2 Wind
Action (AS/NZS 1170-2 : 2002) In the Australian codal provision to obtain the cross wind
response it is necessary to compute the coefficient (Cfs) for which figures and expressions are
specified for selected (h:b:d) ratios.
The objective of design codes is to have structures that will behave elastically under
earthquakes that can be expected to occur more than once in the life of the building. It is also
expected that the structure would survive major earthquakes without collapse that might occur
during the life of the building. To avoid collapse during a large earthquake, members must be
ductile enough to absorb and dissipate energy by post-elastic deformations. Nevertheless,
during a large earthquake the deflection of the structure should not be such as to endanger life
or cause a loss of structural integrity. Ideally, the damage should be repairable. The repair may
require the replacement of crushed concrete and/or the injection of epoxy resin into cracks in
the concrete caused by yielding of reinforcement. In some cases, the order of ductility involved
during a severe earthquake may be associated with large permanent deformations and in those
cases, the resulting damage could be beyond repair. (Miranda, E.,1996)
The design seismic forces acting on a structure as a result of ground shaking are usually
determined by one of the following methods:

 Static analysis, using equivalent seismic forces obtained from response spectra for horizontal
earthquake motions.
 Dynamic analysis, either modal response spectrum analysis or time history analysis with
numerical integration using earthquake records.

24
 CHAPTER 3: CONSTRAINTS

3.1 Design Constraints

Constraint is defined as a constraining condition, agency, or force that limits the systems’
performance in a given context/environment. Constraint describes the relationships between
objects and processes. Constraints have to be managed. Practically, in all cases the constraints’
limiting impact can be reduced or eliminated.
Among other possible constraints, the following were considered to have relevant impact on
the design of the five (5) storey commercial building:

3.1.1 Constraints:

1. Safety (Displacement) - The Location of the Project is loacted at San Jose Del
Monte, Bulacan, and from the Map of PHIVOLCS which is the “FaultFinder”, and
as per location the project is along the path of the “West Valley Fault. Safety
always plays a major role in any project. The five storey (5) commercial building
will be designed in accordance with National Building Code of the Philippines
Volume II. And to measure the resistivty of each configuration, the designer will
use Staad Pro V8i for measuring the deflections produced by the governing load
combinations. The designer will consider the maximum deflections in picking
the configuration that best suits to solve this phenomenon.
2. Economic Cost (Cost) - The economic constraint is greatly relevant in designing
the most suitable structural design such as the structural framework, trusses,
beam, connections and etc. for this project. The client has a very limited
resources for this proposal so the designer must come up with the trade-off that
requires lesser cost but also can able to sustain for a long period of time. The
designer propose the use of various frame configurations that are validated
through studies by a lot of experts in Structural Steel Design which will work.
3. Constructability (Duration) - The designer will also consider duration of the
construction because the client has a very limited budget, therefore a longer
duration will result to a higher cost, Thus, the designer will evaluate each trade-
offs and will choose the final design that will able to lessen the man-hour
duration.

25
 CHAPTER 4: DESIGN OF STRUCTURE

4.1 Design Methodology

The initial phase of this design project is to consider the layout or the architectural
plans of the project. Mixed-used building typically have a usual and straight forward designs.
And as the main purpose of this structure which is to serve people, therefore the designer must
use all the spaces provided in each span of the bridge. The structure is located near the West
Valley Fault, and as the main concern of the design is the safety against seismic forces when
earthquake occurs. Building codes, such as the National Building Code, outlines requirements
for egress and occupancy. As the design process continues, the designer design its structural
members in the most critical members of the structure. Typical beams, girders and connections
were designed following the Structural Steel Design, 4th Edition and AISC Steel Construction
Manual. The structural scheme selection process was one of the most difficult tasks to
complete. The structural frame is design to sustain for gravity loads, live loads, and lateral loads
which mainly produced by either wind or seismic. The designer used computer aided software
specifically “Staad Pro V8i” in the structural analysis of the project. After the structural analysis,
the designer can proceed to the design of each members with different tradeoffs conforming to
each constraints.

4.2 Geometric Modelling

To simulate all the possible effects of different loadings to the structure with
different load combinations, the designer use Staad Pro V8i to have a thorough anlysis for this
first bridge configuration.

4.3 Design Loads

The following tables and paragraphs defines the load parameters that will be applied on
the structure. These loadings are necessary for the computation of the forces in each members
in order to start the design process. These values are the minimum values provided by the
National Structural Code of the Philippines Volume II.

26
4.3.1 Dead Load
The following weights are to be used in computing the dead load:
COLUMNS
Design Criteria: Reinforced Concrete (stone, including gravel) = 23.6 Kn/m^3
Floor No. Width Depth Height Quantity Volume Dead Load
1 0.35 0.35 3 42 15.435 364.266
2 0.35 0.35 3 42 15.435 364.266
3 0.35 0.35 3 42 15.435 364.266
4 0.35 0.35 3 42 15.435 364.266
5 0.35 0.35 3 42 15.435 364.266
TOTAL DL= 1821.33 kN
BEAMS
Design Criteria: Reinforced Concrete (stone, including gravel) = 23.6 Kn/m^3
Length
of beam Depth Width Quantity No. of Floors Volume Dead Load
6.125 0.4 0.3 12 5 44.1 1040.76
6.1996 0.4 0.3 14 5 52.07664 1229.008704
6.2008 0.4 0.3 7 5 26.04336 614.623296
6.075 0.4 0.3 10 5 36.45 860.22
6.2 0.4 0.3 22 5 81.84 1931.424
3.275 0.4 0.3 6 5 11.79 278.244
TOTAL DL= 4913.52 kN
SLAB OF ROOF
Floor Area of
Floor No. Depth Area Columns Total Area Volume Dead Load
0.15 893.4101 2.7 890.7101 133.606515 3153.113754 kN

WALLS
OUTER WALLS
No. of
Length Height Thickness Sides No. Of Floors Volume Dead Load
28.2 2.7 0.15 2 5 114.21 2695.356
31.2 2.7 0.15 1 5 63.18 1491.048
6.2 2.7 0.15 2 5 25.11 592.596
18.45 2.7 0.15 1 5 37.36125 881.7255
6.125 2.7 0.15 2 5 24.80625 585.4275
TOTAL DL= 6246.153 kN
INNER WALLS
Area of
inner Area of Total Total
walls doorways Area Thickness No. Of Floors Volume Dead Load
183.2 31.5 151.7 0.15 5 113.775 2685.09 kN

27
4.3.2 Live Load

Live Load
2nd Floor
Room/Space Area Quantity Uniform Load (Kpa) Live Load (kN)
Commercial Space 38.44 2 4.8 369.024
Audio Visual 76.88 1 2.9 222.952
Fitness Area 76.88 1 3.6 276.768
Staff's Office 38.44 2 2.4 184.512
Mechanical Room 29.14 2 4.8 279.744
Fire Exit 19.84 2 4.8 190.464
Stair Ways 38.44 1 4.8 184.512
Balconies 38.44 2 4.8 369.024
Restrooms 19.22 2 2.4 92.256
Hallways 425.32 1 4.8 2041.536
TOTAL 4210.792 kN
3nd Floor
Room/Space Area Quantity Uniform Load (Kpa) Live Load (kN)
Commercial Space 38.44 3 4.8 553.536
Waiting Area 38.44 2 2.4 184.512
Food Court 115.32 2 4.8 1107.072
Staff's Office 38.44 1 4.8 184.512
Mechanical Room 29.14 1 2.9 84.506
Fire Exit 19.84 2 4.8 190.464
Stair Ways 38.44 1 4.8 184.512
Balconies 38.44 2 4.8 369.024
Restrooms 19.22 2 2.4 92.256
Hallways 386.26 1 4.8 1854.048
TOTAL 4804.442 kN
4nd Floor
Room/Space Area Quantity Uniform Load (Kpa) Live Load (kN)
Commercial Space 38.44 2 4.8 369.024
Conference Room 76.88 2 4.8 738.048
Mechanical Room 29.14 2 4.8 279.744
Function Room 76.88 1 4.8 369.024
Fire Exit 19.84 2 4.8 190.464
Stair Ways 38.44 1 4.8 184.512
Balconies 38.44 2 4.8 369.024
Restrooms 19.22 2 2.4 92.256

28
 Hallways 425.32 1 4.8 2041.536
TOTAL 4633.632 kN
5th Floor
Room/Space Area Quantity Uniform Load (Kpa) Live Load (kN)
Commercial Space 38.44 3 4.8 553.536
IT Room 76.88 1 4.8 369.024
Staff's Office 38.44 1 2.4 92.256
Mechanical Room 29.14 2 4.8 279.744
Function Room 76.88 1 4.8 369.024
Fire Exit 19.84 2 4.8 190.464
Stair Ways 38.44 1 4.8 184.512
Balconies 38.44 2 4.8 369.024
Restrooms 19.22 2 2.4 92.256
Hallways 425.32 1 4.8 2041.536
TOTAL 4541.376 kN

4.3.3 Transversal and Longitudinal Forces

PORTAL DUE TO WINDLOAD

Traversed frame due to windloads

Floor Bays Loading Shear
FR 6 1667.459 97.882
5 6 1608.772 273.09198
4 6 1534.436 400.88886
3 6 1436.628 520.60788
2 6 1346.642 632.82823
Shear at Column
member (kN) Moment @ Column kN.m
AJ-AC 97.2882 170.25435
AK-AD 194.5764 340.5087
AL-AE 194.5764 340.5087
AM-AF 194.5764 340.5087
AH-AG 194.5764 340.5087
AO-AH 194.5764 340.5087
AP-AI 97.2882 170.25435
AC-V 273.01918 477.783565
AD-W 546.03836 955.56713
AE-X 546.03836 955.56713
AF-Y 546.03836 955.56713
AG-Z 546.03836 955.56713

29
A-AA 546.03836 955.56713
AI-AB 273.01918 477.783565
V-O 400.8886 701.55505
W-P 801.7772 1403.1101
X-Q 801.7772 1403.1101
Y-R 801.7772 1403.1101
Z-S 801.7772 1403.1101
AA-T 801.7772 1403.1101
AB-U 400.8886 701.55505
O-H 520.60788 911.06379
P-I 1041.21576 1822.12758
OJ 1041.21576 1822.12758
R-K 1041.21576 1822.12758
S-L 1041.21576 1822.12758
T-M 1041.21576 1822.12758
U-N 520.60788 911.06379
H-A 632.82825 1107.449438
I-B 1265.6565 2214.898875
J-C 1265.6565 2214.898875
R-D 1265.6565 2214.898875
L-E 1265.6565 2214.898875
M-F 1265.6565 2214.898875
H-G 632.82825 1107.449438

Member Shear @ Longitudinal Frame(KN) Moment @ Longitudinal Frame(KN.m)

30
AC-AJ 125.2205 219.1359
AD-AK 250.441 438.2718
AE-AL 250.441 438.2718
AF-AM 250.441 438.2718
AG-AN 250.441 438.2718
AH-AO 250.441 438.2718
AI-AP 125.2205 219.1359
VAC 246.164 430.7837
WAD 492.3242 861.5674
XAE 492.3242 861.5674
YAF 492.3242 861.5674
ZAG 492.3242 861.5674
AA-AH 492.3242 861.5674
AB-AI 246.164 430.7837
OV 361.6837 632.9465
PW 723.3644 1265.893
QX 723.3644 1265.893
RY 723.3644 1265.893
SZ 723.3644 1265.893
TAA 723.3644 1265.893
UAB 361.6837 632.9465
HO 470.0734 822.6285
IP 940.1468 1645.2569
JQ 940.1468 1645.2569
KR 940.1468 1645.2569
IS 940.1468 1645.2569
MT 440.1469 1645.2569
NU 470.0734 822.6285
AH 571.9017 1000.828
BI 1035.8084 2001.656
CJ 1035.8084 2001.656
DK 1035.8084 2001.656
EI 1035.8084 2001.656
FM 1035.8084 2001.656
GN 571.9017 1000.828

31
Member Shear @ Girder Moment @ Girder
AJAK 70.689 219.1359
AKAL 70.689 219.1359
ALAM 70.689 219.1359
AMAN 70.689 219.1359
ANAO 136.9599 219.1359
AOAP 70.689 219.1359
ACAD 209.6515 649.9196
ADAE 209.6515 649.9196
AEAF 209.6515 649.9196
AFAG 209.6515 649.9196
AGAH 406.1998 649.9196
AHAI 209.6515 649.9196
VW 343.1388 1063.7302
WX 343.1388 1063.7302
XY 343.1388 1063.7302
YZ 343.1388 1063.7302
ZAA 664.8314 1063.7302
AAAB 343.1388 1063.7302
OP 469.5403 1455.575
PQ 469.5403 1455.575
QR 469.5403 1455.575
RS 469.5403 1455.575
ST 909.7344 1455.575
TU 469.5403 1455.575
HI 588.2117 1823.4564
IJ 588.2117 1823.4564
JK 588.2117 1823.4564
KL 588.2117 1823.4564
LM 1134.6603 1823.4564
MN 588.2117 1823.4564

32
4.3.4 Wind Load

33
CRITERIA SPECIFICATION FACTOR
RICK CATEGORY ESSENTIAL FACILITY CATERGORY IV
EXPOSURE CATEGORY CASE B AND D DOES NOT APPLY EXPOSURE C
BASIC WIND SPEED (v) LOCATED AT SAN JOSE DEL MONTE BULACAN 200 kph=500/9 m/s
WIND DIRECTIONALY FACTOR (kd) MAIN WIND FORCE RESISTING SYSTEN IN BUILDINGS 0.85
TOPOGRAPHIC FACTOR (kzt) FLAT TERRAIN 1
GUST EFFECT FACTOR G RIGID BUILDING 0.85
INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT (Gcpi) ENCLOSED BUILDING ±0.18

VELOCITY PRESSURE
qz=0.613(kz)(kzt)(kd)(v)²= 1608.179012kz

Velocity Pressure CoefficientA(kz)

h2 3.5 0.85
h3 7 0.92667
h4 10.5 1.01
h5 14 1.0733
h12 17.5 1.1233

q(3.5)= 1.36695216
q(7)= 1.490251245
q(10.5)= 1.624260802
q(14)= 1.726058534
q(17.5)= 1.806467484

EXTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT(Cp)

WINDWARD WALL: cp= 0.8
LEEWARD WALL:Cp= -0.479487179
SIDEWALL:Cp= -0.7
WINDPRESSURE(P)
WINDWARD WALL
P(3.5)= 1.254701069 0.604353869
P(7)= 1.338544447 0.688197247
P(10.5)= 1.429670945 0.779323745
P(14)= 1.498893403 0.848546203
P(17.5)= 1.553571489 0.903224289

34
LEEWARD WALL
P(3.5)= -0.23194703 -0.88229423
P(7)= -0.282199311 -0.88229423
P(10.5)= -0.336816795 -0.987163995
P(14)= -0.378305896 -1.028653096
P(17.5)= -0.411077698 -1.061424898

SIDEWALL
P(3.5)= -0.488162935 -1.138510135
P(7)= -0.561525891 -1.211873091
P(10.5)= -0.641261577 -1.291608777
P(14)= -0.701831227 -1.352178427
P(17.5)= -0.749674553 -1.400021753

WINDWARD(Kpa)
LEVEL MAXIMUM MINIMUM
2 1.254701069 0.604353869
3 1.338544447 0.688197247
4 1.429670945 0.779323745
5 1.498893403 0.848546203
ROOF 1.553571489 0.903224289
LEEWARD(Kpa)
LEVEL MAXIMUM MINIMUM
2 -0.23194703 -0.88229423
3 -0.282199311 -0.88229423
4 -0.336816795 -0.987163995
5 -0.378305896 -1.028653096
ROOF -0.411077698 -1.061424898

LEEWARD(Kpa)
LEVEL MAXIMUM MINIMUM
2 -0.488162935 -1.138510135
3 -0.561525891 -1.211873091
4 -0.641261577 -1.291608777
5 -0.701831227 -1.352178427
ROOF -0.749674553 -1.400021753

35
 4.3.5 Earthquakes (Seismic Forces)

DESIGN CRITERIA LATERAL FORCES

CRITERIA SPECIFICATION FACTOR LEVEL W(KN) h(m) Wxhx
RISK CATEGORY ESSENTIAL FACILITY CATEGORY IV 2 16127.03 3.5 48381.09
SEISMIC ZONE PROVINCE OF BULACAN ZONE 4 3 16720.682 7 1172887.57
SOIL PROFILE HARD ROCK SA 4 16549.872 10.5 173773.656
SEISMIC SOURCE TYPE 5.2 KM AWAY FROM WEST VALLEY FAULT TYPE A 5 16457.61851 14 230406.6591
IMPORTANCE FACTOR ESSENTIAL FACILITIES 1.5 ROOF 3153.114 17.5 55179.495
TOTAL 1680628.47

WEIGHT PER FLOOR

FLOOR DL LL
2 11916.24 4210.79 2 1175.954652
3 11916.24 4804.442 3 2759.274892
4 11916.24 4633.632 4 4138.912342
5 11916.24 4541.376 5 5496.908422
FR 3153.114 0 FR 1314.255613

36
4.4 Structural Analysis

Fig 23: Shear Forces at Y-axis

Figure 24: Bending Moment at Z – Axis

37
Figure 25: Shear Forces at Z – Axis

Figure 26: Wind Loads

38
Figure 27: Earthquake Loads

39
 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION
5.1 Staad Results

40