I

TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is
false. Explain your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
1. The ​Bangalore Draft​, approved at a Roundtable Meeting of Chief Justices held at
The Hague, is now the New Code of Judicial Conduct in the Philippines. ​TRUE.
2. An ​attorney ad hoc is a lawyer appointed by the court to represent an absentee
defendant in a suit in which the appointment is made. ​TRUE
3. A ​charging lien​, as distinguished from a ​retaining lien​, is an active lien which can
be enforced by execution. ​TRUE
4. A lawyer cannot refuse to divulge the name or identity of his client. ​FALSE.
General rule he can’t but if it will make the client to be liable for civil liability then
the lawyer can refuse to divulge the name or identity of his client.
5. A notary public is disqualified from performing a notarial act when the party to the
document is a relative by affinity within the 4th civil degree.
II
1. What is the object of the bar examinations? Explain. (2%)
2. What are the three (3) tests to determine conflict of interest for practicing
lawyers? Explain each briefly. (3%)
​First test, w a lawyer is duty bound to fight for an issue or claim in behalf of one
client and at the same time oppose it for the other client.
Second, the inconsistency of interests is whether acceptance of new realation
would prevent the full discharge of the lawyer’s duty of undivided fidelity and loyalty to
the client or invite suspicion of unfaithfulness.
Third test, whether the lawyer woulkd be called upon in the new realarion to use
against a former client any confidential infor acquired through their connection through
the prev employment.
III
1. May a party appear as his own counsel in a criminal or in a civil case? Explain.
(3%)
Yes,
2. What is the student practice rule? (2%)
Completed 3rd yr, under supervision of ibp member, mtc
IV
1. In a case for homicide filed before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Presiding
Judge Quintero issued an order for the arrest of the accused, granted a motion
for the reduction of bail, and set the date for the arraignment of the accused.
Subsequently, Judge Quintero inhibited himself from the case, alleging that even
before the case was raffled to his court, he already had personal knowledge of
the circumstances surrounding the case. Is Judge Quintero’s inhibition justified?
Explain. (3%)
2. After being diagnosed with ​stress dermatitis,​ Judge Rosalind, without seeking
permission from the Supreme Court, refused to wear her robe during court
proceedings. When her attention was called, she explained that whenever she
wears her robe she is reminded of her heavy caseload, thus making her tense.
 This, in turn, triggers the outbreak of skin rashes. Is Judge Rosalind justified in
not wearing her judicial robe? Explain. (3%)
V
Cliff and Greta were law school sweethearts. Cliff became a lawyer, but Greta dropped
out. One day, Cliff asked Greta to sign a marriage contract. The following day, Cliff
showed Greta the document already signed by an alleged solemnizing officer and two
witnesses. Cliff then told Greta that they were already married and Greta consented to
go on a honeymoon. Thereafter, the couple cohabited and begot a child. Two years
later, Cliff left Greta and married a Venezuelan beauty. Incensed, Greta filed a
disbarment complaint against Cliff. Will the case prosper? Explain. (4%)
VI
Atty. Sabungero obtained a notarial commission. One Sunday, while he was at the
cockpit, a person approached him with an affidavit that needed to be notarized. Atty.
Sabungero immediately pulled out from his pocket his small notarial seal, and notarized
the document. Was the affidavit validly notarized? Explain. (3%)
VII
Atty. Manuel is counsel for the defendant in a civil case pending before the RTC. After
receiving the plaintiff’s Pre-Trial Brief containing the list of witnesses, Atty. Manuel
interviewed some of the witnesses for the plaintiff without the consent of plaintiff’s
counsel.
1. Did Atty. Manuel violate any ethical standard for lawyers? Explain. (3%)
2. Will your answer be the same if it was the plaintiff who was interviewed by Atty.
Manuel without the consent of plaintiff’s counsel? Explain. (2%)
VIII
Court of Appeals (CA) Justice Juris was administratively charged with gross ignorance
of the law for having issued an order "temporarily enjoining" the implementation of a writ
of execution, and for having issued another order for the parties to "maintain the status
quo" in the same case. Both orders are obviously without any legal basis and violate CA
rules. In his defense, Justice Juris claims that the challenged orders were collegial acts
of the CA Division to which he belonged. Thus, he posits that the charge should not be
filed against him alone, but should include the two other CA justices in the Division. Is
the contention of Justice Juris tenable? Explain. (3%)
IX
Alexander Sison, resident of 111 Libertad St., Sampaloc, Manila, engages your services
as lawyer. He tells you that a certain Mr. Juan Jamero of 222 Juan Luna St., Tondo,
Manila, owes him P1,000,000.00; that the debt is long overdue; and that, despite
repeated demands, Jamero has failed to comply with his obligation. He also shows you
a promissory note, executed on January 3, 2008, wherein Jamero promises to pay the
amount of P1,000,000.00, with 12% interest per annum, within one (1) year from date of
note. Sison agrees to pay you attorney’s fees in the amount of P75,000.00, and a fee of
P3,000.00 for every appearance in court.
As Sison’s lawyer, prepare the complaint that you will file in court against Juan Jamero.
(10%)
X
Given the same facts in No. IX above, assume that summons had been served on
Jamero, but no responsive pleading was filed within the reglementary period.
Prepare a motion to declare Jamero in default. (4%)
PART II
XI
TRUE or FALSE. ​Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is
false. Explain your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
1. The duty of a lawyer to his client is more paramount than his duty to the Court.
2. It is ethical for a lawyer to advise his client to enter a plea of guilty in a criminal
case if the lawyer is personally convinced that he cannot win the case for his
client.
3. There is no presumption of innocence or improbability of wrongdoing in an
attorney’s favor when he deals with his client concurrently as lawyer and as
businessman.
4. The satisfaction of a judgment debt does not, by itself, bar or extinguish the
attorney’s liens, except when there has been a waiver by the lawyer, as shown
by his conduct or his passive omission.
5. A companion or employee of the judge who lives in the judge’s household is
included in the definition of the "judge’s family."
XII
Write the complete text of the attorney’s oath. (5%)
XIII
Atty. Hyde, a bachelor, practices law in the Philippines. On long weekends, he dates
beautiful actresses in Hong Kong. Kristine, a neighbor in the Philippines, filed with the
Supreme Court an administrative complaint against the lawyer because of sex videos
uploaded through the internet showing Atty. Hyde’s sordid dalliance with the actresses
in Hong Kong.
In his answer, Atty. Hyde (1) questions the legal personality and interest of Kristine to
institute the complaint and (2) insists that he is a bachelor and the sex videos relate to
his private life which is outside public scrutiny and have nothing to do with his law
practice.
Rule on the validity of Atty. Hyde’s defenses. (5%)
XIV
Marlyn, a widow, engaged the services of Atty. Romanito in order to avert the
foreclosure of several parcels of land mortgaged by her late husband to several
creditors. Atty. Romanito advised the widow to execute in his favor deeds of sale over
the properties, so that he could sell them and generate funds to pay her creditors. The
widow agreed. Atty. Romanito did not sell the properties, but paid the mortgage
creditors with his own funds, and had the land titles registered in his name. Atty.
Romanito succeeds in averting the foreclosure. Is he administratively liable? Reasons.
(3%)
XV
Atty. Wilmar represented Beatriz in a partition case among heirs, and won. When
Wilmar demanded payment of attorney’s fees, Beatriz refused to pay. Wilmar sued
Beatriz for the unpaid attorney’s fees and obtained a favorable judgment. Thereafter,
Beatriz filed an administrative complaint against Wilmar claiming that he lied when he
stated in his claim for attorney’s fees that the subject of the partition case involved the
entire estate of the deceased when, in fact, it covered only 50% thereof. Wilmar set up
the defenses that (1) Beatriz filed the complaint only to delay the execution of the
judgment ordering her to pay attorney’s fees and (2) Beatriz engaged in
forum-shopping. Are the defenses of Atty. Wilmar tenable? Explain. (4%)
XVI
Atty. Simeon persuaded Armando, Benigno and Ciriaco to invest in a business venture
that later went bankrupt. Armando, Benigno and Ciriaco charged Atty. Simeon with
estafa. Simultaneously, they filed an administrative complaint against the lawyer with
the Supreme Court.
1. If Simeon is convicted of estafa, will he be disbarred? Explain. (3%)
2. If Simeon is acquitted of the estafa charge, will the disbarment complaint be
dismissed? Explain. (3%)
XVII
When Atty. Romualdo interviewed his client, Vicente, who is accused of murder, the
latter confessed that he killed the victim in cold blood. Vicente also said that when he
takes the witness stand, he will deny having done so. Is Atty. Romualdo obliged, under
his oath as lawyer, to inform the judge that [a] his client is guilty and [b] his client will
commit perjury on the witness stand? Explain. (4%)
XVIII
On a Saturday, Atty. Paterno filed a petition for a writ of amparo with the Court of
Appeals (CA). Impelled by the urgency for the issuance of the writ, Atty. Paterno
persuaded his friend, CA Justice Johnny de la Cruz, to issue the writ of amparo and the
notice of hearing without the signature of the two other Justices-members of the CA
division. Are Atty. Paterno and Justice de la Cruz guilty of unethical conduct? Explain.
(4%)
XIX
Romeo Hacendero wants to authorize Juanito Ahente to sell, on cash basis, for a price
not lower than P500,000.00, a parcel of land, situated in Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, and
covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 123456, in the Register of Deeds of Nueva
Ecija. Prepare a Special Power of Attorney granting such authority. (4%)
XX
From the affidavits and the death certificate submitted during the preliminary
investigation, the following facts are established: At 6:00 o’clock in the evening of
September 13, 2009, at the corner of Dapitan and Dos Castillas Sts., Sampaloc, Manila,
Edgar Bastonero, ​alias Bugoy, and Carlos Tirador, ​alias Pogi, accosted Johnny Escolar,
a student, and demanded the latter’s cellular phone and wrist watch. Because Johnny
resisted, Bastonero pulled out a knife and stabbed Johnny several times in the chest,
causing instantaneous death. Bastonero and Tirador then ran away. The affidavits were
executed by William Tan and Henry Uy, classmates of Johnny, who witnessed the
entire incident. The death certificate was issued by Dr. Jose Cabra who conducted the
autopsy on Johnny.
As Assistant City Prosecutor in Manila, prepare the appropriate criminal information to
be filed in court. (10%)
 -I-
1. Why is law a profession and not a trade? 2.5%
2. Why is an attorney considered an officer of the court? 2.5%
- II -
1. Is there a distinction between "practicing lawyer" and "trial lawyer"? 2.5%
2. Enumerate the instances when a law student may appear in court as counsel for
a litigant. 2.5%
- III -
1. The Supreme Court suspended indefinitely Atty. Fernandez from the practice of
law for gross immorality. He asked the Municipal Circuit Trial Court Judge of his
town if he can be appointed counsel ​de oficio for Tony, a childhood friend who is
accused of theft. The judge refused because Atty. Fernandez's name appears in
the Supreme Court's List of Suspended Lawyers. Atty. Fernandez then inquired if
he can appear as a friend for Tony to defend him.
2. If you were the judge, will you authorize him to appear in your court as a friend
for Tony? 5%
3. Supposing Tonyis a defendant in a civil case for collection of sum of money
before the same court, can Atty. Fernandez appear for him to conduct his
litigation? 5%
- IV -
1. Atty. Oldie, 80 yearsold, refuses to pay his IBP dues. He argues he is a senior
citizen and semi-retired from the practice of law. Therefore, he should be exempt
from pating IBP dues.
2. Is his argument correct? 3%
3. For the same reasons, Atty. Oldie also insist that he should be exempt from the
Mandatory COntinuing Legal Education (MCLE) requirements.
4. Should he be exempt? 3%
-V-
Myrna, petitioner in case for custody of children against her husband, sought advice
from Atty. Mendoza whom she met at a party. She informed Atty. Fernandez that her
lawyer, Atty. Khan, has been charging her exorbitant appearance fees when all he does
move for postponements which have unduly delayed the proceedings; and that recently,
she learned that Atty. Khan approached her husband asking for a huge amount in
exchange for the withdrawal of her Motion for issuance of Hold Departure Order so that
he and his children can leave for abroad.
1. Is it ethical for Atty. Mendoza to advise Myrna to terminate the servicesof Atty.
Khan and hire him instead for a reasonable attorney's fees? 5%
2. What should Atty. Mendoza do about the information relayed to him by Myrna
that Atty. Khan approached her husband with an indecent proposal? 5%
- VI -
In his petition for certiorari filed with the Supreme Court, Atty . Dizon alleged that Atty
.Padilla, a legal researcher in the Court of Appeals, drafted the assailed Decision; that
he is ignorant of the applicable laws; and that he should be disbarred.
Can Atty .Dizon, in castigating Atty .Padilla, be held liable for unethical conduct against
the Court of Appeals? 5%
- VII -
Provincial Prosecutor Bonifacio refused to represent the Municipality of San Vicente in a
case for collection of taxes. He explained that he cannot handle the case with sincerity
and industry because he does not believe in the position taken by the municipality.
Can Prosecutor Bonifacio be sanctioned administratively? 5%
- VIII -
Prosecutor Coronel entered his appearance on behalf of the State before a Family
Court in a case for declaration of nullity of marriage, but he failed to appear in all the
subsequent proceedings. When required by the Department of Justice to explain, he
argued that the parties in the case were ably represented by their respective counsels
and that his time would be better employed in more substantial prosecutorial functions,
such as investigations, inquests and appearances in court hearings.
Is Atty .Coronel's explanation tenable? 5%
- IX -
Atty .Marie consulted Atty .Hernandez whether she can successfully prosecute her case
for declaration of nullity of marriage she intends to file against her husband. Atty.
Hernandez advised her in writing that the case will not prosper for the reasons stated
therein. Atty .Marie, however, decided to file the case and engaged the services of
another lawyer, Atty .Pe. Her husband, Noel, having learned about the opinion of Atty
.Hernandez, hired him as his lawyer .
Is Atty .Hernandez's acquiescence to be Noel's counsel ethical? 3%
-X-
In the course of a drinking spree with Atty. Holgado who has always been his counsel in
business deals, Simon bragged about his recent sexual adventures with socialites
known for their expensive tastes. When Atty. Holgado asked Simon how he manages to
finance his escapades, the latter answered that he has been using the bank deposits of
rich clients of Banco Filipino where he works as manager.
Is Simon's revelation to Atty. Holgado covered by the attorney-client privilege? 5%
- XI -
The contract of attorney's fees entered into by Atty .Quintos and his client, Susan,
stipulates that if a judgment is rendered in her favor, he gets 60% of the property
recovered as contingent fee. In turn, he will assume payment of all expenses of the
litigation.
1. Is the agreement valid? 2.5%
2. May Atty .Quintos and Susan increase the amount of the contingent fee to 80%?
2.5%
- XII -
1. What is "assumpsit" and when is it proper? 2%
2. Give 4 instances when a client may validly refuse to pay his lawyer the full
amount of attorney's fees stipulated in their written contract. 4%
- XIII -
Give 4 instances when a client may validly refuse to pay his lawyer the full amount of
attorney's fees stipulated in their written contract. 4%
 - XIV -
Atty. Perez was admitted as a member of the New York Bar. While in Manhattan, he
was convicted of estafa and was disbarred.
Does his disbarment in New York a ground for his automatic disbarment in the
Philippines? 2.5%
- XV -
Which of the following acts does not constitute a ground for disbarment? Explain. 2.5%
1. Gross misconduct
2. Fraudulent misrepresentation
3. Grossly immoral conduct
4. Violation of the Lawyer's Oath
5. Willful disobedience to a lawful order of the Supreme Court
6. Malpractice
7. Appearance of a non-lawyer as an attorney for a litigant in a case
8. - XVI -
9. Draft an Affidafit of Desistance in a criminal case for acts of lasciviosness.
(Exclude the jurat)
10. - XVII -
11. Draft an affidafit of Self-Adjucation of the estate of a deceased person. (Exclude
the jurat)
12. - XVIII -
13. Draft an Information charging Obet Buena with arson filed with the Regional Trial
Court. Branch 10, Manila. 10%
NOTHING FOLLOWS

(1) Atty. Mike started teaching Agrarian Reform and Taxation in June 2001 at the Arts
and Sciences Department of the Far Eastern University. In 2005, he moved to San
Sebastian Institute of Law where he taught Political Law. Is Atty. Mike exempt from
complying with the MCLE for the 4th compliance period in April 2013?
(A) ​No, since he has yet to complete the required teaching experience to be exempt.
(B) No, because he is not yet a bar reviewer.
(C) Yes, since by April 2013, he will have been teaching law for more than 10 years.
(D) Yes, since he updated himself in law by engaging in teaching.
(2) The acknowledgment appearing in a deed of sale reads: "Before me personally
appeared this 30 August 2010 Milagros A. Ramirez, who proved her identity to me
through witnesses: 1. Rosauro S. Balana, Passport UU123456; 1-5-2010/ Baguio City;
and 2. Elvira N. Buela, Passport VV200345; 1-17-2009/ Manila. "Both witnesses, of
legal ages, under oath declare that: Milagros A. Ramirez is personally known to them;
she is the same seller in the foregoing deed of sale; she does not have any current
identification document nor can she obtain one within a reasonable time; and they are
not privy to or are interested in the deed he signed." What is the status of such a
notarial acknowledgment?
(A) Questionable since the notary public is not shown to personally know the principal
party.
(B) Ineffective since it included parties not privy to the deed.
(C) Invalid since the evidence of identity is non-compliant with the notarial rules.
(D) ​Valid since it is a manner of establishing the identity of the person executing the
document.
(3) Atty. Francisco’s retainer agreement with RXU said that his attorney's fees in its
case against CRP "shall be 15% of the amounts collected." Atty. Francisco asked the
trial court to issue a temporary restraining order against CRP but this was denied,
prompting him to file a petition for certiorari with the Court of Appeals to question the
order of denial. At this point, RXU terminated Atty. Francisco’s services. When the
parties later settled their dispute amicably, CRP paid RXU P100 million. Because of
this, Atty. Francisco came around and claimed a 15% share in the amount. What should
be his attorney’s fees?
(A) Nothing because the compromise came after RXU terminated him.
(B) 15% of what CRP paid RXU or P15 million.
(C) ​A reasonable amount that the court shall fix upon proof of quantum meruit.
(D) Nothing since he was unable to complete the work stated in the retainer contract.
(4) Lee became a lawyer in 1988 under a claim that he is a Filipino like his parents.
Efren sought Lee’s disbarment on the ground that he really is a Chinese. To prove he is
a Filipino, Lee cited an Albay regional trial court’s final judgment in an action to recover
real property which mentioned his citizenship as Filipino. This final judgment resulted in
the correction of his birth records in a separate special proceeding to show he is a
Filipino, not Chinese as there stated. Is Lee’s claim to Filipino citizenship valid?
(A) ​No, since the mention of his citizenship in the land case was just incidental.
(B) No, since those rulings were not appealed to the Supreme Court.
(C) Yes, because the rulings in his favor have become final and executory.
(D) Yes, since his parents are Filipinos based on what he said in his bar exam petition.
(5) Sheryl, Eric's counsel, once asked for postponement and the court granted it since
the opposing counsel, Bernadine, did not object. Eric then asked Sheryl not to allow any
further postponements because his case has been pending for 8 years. When trial
resumed, Bernadine moved to reset the trial because of her infant's ailment. What must
Sheryl do?
(A) Remind the Court that it has the duty to promptly decide the case.
(B) Interpose no objection since she too once sought postponement without Bernadine's
objection.
(C) Vehemently oppose Bernadine's motion for being contrary to Eric's wishes.
(D) ​Submit the motion to the Court's sound discretion.
(6) In a verified complaint, Kathy said that Judge Florante decided a petition for
correction of entry involving the birth record of her grandson, Joshua, who happened to
be child of Judge Florante's daughter, Pilita. Judge Florante insisted that he committed
no wrong since the proceeding was non-adversarial and since it merely sought to
correct an erroneous entry in the child’s birth certificate. Is Judge Florante liable?
(A) ​Yes, because Florante breached the rule on mandatory disqualification.
(B) No, because Judge Florante has no pecuniary interest in the proceeding.
(C) No, because it is true the proceeding was non-adversarial so it prejudiced no one.
(D) Yes, since the correction in the child’s record affects the details of birth of the child.
(7) Which of the following statements best describes the distinct traditional dignity that
the legal profession enjoys over other professions?
(A) People are quite dependent on lawyers for their skills in getting them out of trouble
with the law.
(B) ​Its members strive to maintain honesty even in their private dealings.
(C) Its members earn by charging specified emoluments or fees.
(D) The profession is anchored on a fiduciary relation with the client.
(8) Raul sought Ely's disbarment for notarizing a deed of sale knowing that four of the
sellers were dead. Ely admitted that he notarized the deed of sale but only after his
client assured him that the signatures of the others were authentic. Later, Raul moved
to have the complaint against him dismissed on the ground that it was filed because of a
misunderstanding which had already been clarified. This prompted the IBP to
recommend the dismissal of the complaint. Can the dismissal be allowed?
(A) No, unless the complainant executes an affidavit of desistance.
(B) Yes, since no compelling reason remained to continue with it.
(C) Yes, but recall Ely's notarial commission since the charge against him seems
meritorious.
(D) ​No, given Ely’s admission that he notarized the document when some signatories
were absent.
(9) When will Atty. Antonio's notarial commission expire if he applied for and was given
such commission on 12 November 2010?
(A) 31 December 2012
(B) ​31 December 2011
(C) 11 November 2011
(D) 11 November 2012
(10) Elaine filed a complaint against Fely before their barangay concerning a contract
that they entered into. During conciliation, Fely came with Sarah, who claimed the right
to represent her minor sister. The barangay captain let Sarah assist her sister.
Eventually, the barangay issued a certificate to file action after the parties failed to settle
their differences. When Sarah formally appeared as lawyer for her sister, Elaine filed an
administrative complaint against her for taking part in the barangay conciliation and
preventing the parties from taking meaningful advantage of the same. Is Sarah liable?
(A) No, because she has to represent her sister who was a minor.
(B) No, because the Court can always dismiss the case without prejudice to a genuine
conciliation.
(C) Yes, because what Sarah did was deceitful and amounts to fraud.
(D) ​Yes, because as a lawyer, she is absolutely forbidden to appear in barangay
conciliations.
(11) Which of the following will subject Atty. Lyndon, a Manila notary public, to sanctions
under the notarial rules?
(A) Notarizing a verification and certification against forum shopping in Manila Hotel at
the request of his Senator-client.
(B) Refusing to notarize an extra-judicial settlement deed after noting that Ambo, a
friend, was delisted as heir when he was in fact one.
(C) ​Performing signature witnessing involving his brother-in-law and recording it in his
register.
(D) Notarizing a deed of sale for someone he knew without requiring any proof of
identity.
(12) Justice Frank, a retired Court of Appeals justice, appeared before the Supreme
Court on behalf of Landbank, a government bank, in a case involving the compensable
value of the property taken from a landowner under the agrarian reform law. The
landowner questioned Justice Frank's appearance in the case, pointing out that the
same is unethical and smacks of opportunism since he obviously capitalizes on his
judicial experience. Is Justice Frank's appearance in the case valid?
(A) ​Yes, because the law allows such appearance as long as the government is not the
adverse party.
(B) No, because he cannot enjoy his retirement pay and at the same time work for a
government institution.
(C) Yes, since Landbank does not perform government function.
(D) No, he should have waited for at least a year to avoid improprieties.
(13) On appeal, RTC Judge Rudy affirmed the MTC’s conviction of Lorna for violation of
the bouncing checks law and awarded Agnes, the complainant, Php1.6 million in
damages. Two years later, upon Lorna’s motion and after ascertaining that her counsel
never received the court's decision, Judge Rudy recalled the entry of judgment in the
case, reversed himself, and absolved Lorna of guilt. Claiming an unjust judgment,
Agnes filed an administrative complained against Judge Rudy, saying that it is plain
from the circumstances that he connived with Lorna, her counsel, and the handling
prosecutor. But she offered no further evidence. Rudy denied the charges and asserted
that any error in his judgment is correctible only by an appeal, not by an administrative
suit. Should Judge Rudy be disciplined?
(A) ​No, because Agnes' complaint is merely based on suspicions and speculations.
(B) No, because Agnes has yet to establish that Rudy's decision is plainly erroneous.
(C) Yes, because he gravely abused his discretion in recalling the entry of judgment.
(D) Yes, because reconsidering the judgment of conviction that the MTC and he earlier
issued shows anomaly in Judge Rudy's action.
(14) After Atty. Benny got a P2 million final judgment in his client’s favor, he promptly
asked the court, without informing his client, to allow him a charging lien over the money
in the amount of P500,000, his agreed fees, The Court issued a writ of execution for the
whole judgment in Atty. Benny's name with an order for him to turn over the excess to
his client. Is Atty. Benny’s action correct?
(A) No, since his fees are excessive.
(B) Yes, since he was merely asserting his right to collect his fees.
(C) Yes, since he would anyway give the excess to his client after getting his fees.
(D) ​No, since he did not disclose to his client the matter of getting a charging lien and a
writ of execution in his name.
(15) On 17 April 2006 NWD, a local water district entity, hired Atty. Chito as private
counsel for a year with the consent of the Office of the Government Corporate Counsel
(OGCC). Shortly after, a leadership struggle erupted in NWD between faction A and
faction B. Siding with the first, Atty. Chito filed several actions against the members of
faction B. Eventually, the court upheld Faction B which thus revoked Atty. Chito’s
retainer on 14 January 2007. With OGCC’s approval, NWD hired Atty. Arthur in his
place. When Atty. Arthur sought the dismissal of the actions that Atty. Chito had
instituted, the latter objected on the ground that his term had not yet expired and Atty.
Arthur had no vacancy to fill up. Is Atty. Chito right?
(A) ​No, because Atty. Chito’s continued appearances in the cases was without authority
since 14 January 2007.
(B) No, because Atty. Arthur would have violated the rule on forum shopping.
(C) Yes, because Atty. Chito’s retainer and authority remained valid until 17 April 2006.
(D) No, because Atty. Chito has the duty to expose the irregularities committed by the
members of Faction B.
(16)Noel and Emily who were involved in a road accident sued Ferdie, the driver of the
other car, for damages. Atty. Jose represented only Noel but he called Emily to testify
for his client. During direct examination, Emily claimed that her injuries were serious
when Atty. Jose knew that they were not. Still, Atty. Jose did not contest such claim.
Ferdie later sued Emily for giving false testimony since her own doctor’s report
contradicted it. He also sued Atty. Jose for foisting a false testimony in court. Is Atty.
Jose liable?
(A) No, because he did not knowingly arrange for Emily to lie in court.
(B) Yes, because he did not advise his client to settle the case amicably.
(C) No, because Emily did not permit him to reveal the falsity to the court.
(D) ​Yes, because he knowingly let Emily's false testimony pass for truth.
(17) In settling his client's claims, Atty. Cruz received from the adverse party P200,000
in cash for his client. Which of the following is an IMPROPER way for Atty. Cruz to
handle the money?
(A) Ask his client to prepare a check for his fees for swapping with the cash.
(B) ​Deposit the cash in his own bank account and later issue his personal check to his
client, less his fees.
(C) Turn over the cash to his client with a request that the latter pay him his fees.
(D) Tell his client about the settlement and the cash and wait for the client's instructions.
(18) Judge Cristina has many law-related activities. She teaches law and delivers
lectures on law. Some in the government consult her on their legal problems. She also
serves as director of a stock corporation devoted to penal reform, where she
participates in both fund raising and fund management. Which of the following
statements applies to her case?
(A) She should not engage in fund raising activities.
(B) Her activities are acceptable except the part where she is involved in fund
management.
(C) ​She can teach law and deliver lectures on law but not do the other things.
(D) All of her activities are legal.
(19) One of the foundation principles of the Bangalore Draft of the Code of Judicial
Conduct is the importance in a modern democratic society of
(A) a judicial system that caters to the needs of the poor and the weak.
(B) ​public confidence in its judicial system and in the moral authority and integrity of its
judiciary.
(C) the existence of independent and impartial tribunals that have the support of its
government.
(D) judges who are learned in law and jurisprudence.
(20) After representing Lenie in an important lawsuit from 1992 to 1995, Atty. Jennifer
lost touch of her client. Ten years later in 2005, Evelyn asked Atty. Jennifer to represent
her in an action against Lenie. Such action involved certain facts, some confidential, to
which Atty. Jennifer was privy because she handled Lenie's old case. Can Atty. Jennifer
act as counsel for Evelyn?
(A) No, but she can assist another lawyer who will handle the case.
(B) Yes, but she must notify Lenie before accepting the case.
(C) ​No, because her duty to keep the confidences of previous clients remains.
(D) Yes, but she cannot reveal any confidential information she previously got.
(21) Eric, a labor federation president, represented Luisa, a dismissed WXT employee,
before the NLRC. Atty. John represented Luisa's two cocomplainants. In due course,
the NLRC reinstated the three complainants with backwages and awarded 25% of the
backwages as attorney’s fees, 15% for Atty. John and 10% for Eric, a non-lawyer. When
WXT appealed to the Court of Appeals, Atty. John questioned Eric’s continued
appearance before that court on Luisa’s behalf, he not being a lawyer. Is Eric's
appearance before the Court of Appeals valid?
(A) Yes, for Eric has a personal stake, the fees awarded to him, in defending the
NLRC's decision in the case.
(B) No, since John can very well represent Luisa, she being in the same situation as his
own clients.
(C) ​No, because the representation of another in courts can be entrusted only to
lawyers.
(D) Yes, since that appeal is a mere continuation of the labor dispute that began at the
NLRC.
(22) In what documented act will a notary public’s failure to affix the expiration date of
his commission warrant administrative sanction?
(A) In the jurat of a secretary's certificate.
(B) ​In the will acknowledged before him.
(C) In the signature witnessing he performed.
(D) In the document copy he certified.
(23) Provincial Governors and Municipal Mayors who are lawyers are MCLE exempt
because
(A) they handle cases of their constituents for free.
(B) ​the Local Government Code prohibits them from practicing their profession.
(C) they are rendering public service.
(D) As experts in local governance, it may be assumed that they are updated on legal
developments.
(24) A difficult client directed his counsel to bring up to the Supreme Court the trial
court’s dismissal of their action. Counsel believes that the trial court acted correctly and
that an appeal would be futile. Which of the following options should counsel take?
(A) ​Withdraw from the case to temper the client’s propensity to litigate.
(B) Engage a collaborating counsel who can assist in the case.
(C) Submit a new retainer proposal to the client for a higher fee.
(D) Elevate the case to the Supreme Court as directed by client.
(25) Although not counsel in a particular case, Atty. Anthony asked Lisa, the RTC clerk
of court, if the case records have already been remanded to the MTC as the Court of
Appeals directed. Lisa said no, saying that the RTC had not yet received a certified
copy of the Court of Appeals’ decision. When Lisa suggested that Atty. Anthony first
secure such a copy, the latter scolded her. Shamed by this, Lisa filed a disciplinary
action against him for encroaching on the work of the lawyers of record. Anthony
defends his follow-up action by claiming good faith and the possibility of entering his
appearance later. Is Anthony liable for his record follow up?
(A) Yes, because he did not inform Lisa of the basis of his interest in the case.
(B) ​Yes, because none of the parties to the case authorized him to do such followup.
(C) No, because he acted in good faith with a view to a possible retainer.
(D) No, because following up the records of any case does not constitute practice of
law.
(26) Administrative proceedings against Judges of all courts and Justices of the Court of
Appeals and the Sandiganbayan shall be
(A) ​private and confidential.
(B) public but subdued.
(C) private but transparent.
(D) public.
(27)When does the initial MCLE compliance period of a newly admitted member of the
bar begin?
(A) ​On the first day of the month of his admission.
(B) On the tenth day of the month of his admission.
(C) On the third year after his admission as member.
(D) On the first year of the next succeeding compliance period.
(28) Counsel for Philzea Mining appealed a decision of the Bureau of Mines, which was
adverse to his client, to the Environment Secretary. At about the same time, he filed a
special civil action of certiorari with the Court of Appeals for the annulment of the same
decision. Did counsel commit any ethical impropriety in his actions?
(A) Yes, since the action he filed with the Court of Appeals was barred by the pendency
of a similar action before the Environment Secretary.
(B) ​Yes, since he was evidently shopping for a sympathetic forum, a condemnable
practice.
(C) No, since his appeal to the Environment Secretary was administrative, not judicial.
(D) No, since he has to exhaust all available remedies to serve his client’s interest.
(29) Atty. Melissa witnessed the car accident that resulted in injury to Manny, a friend of
hers. While visiting him at the hospital, she advised him about what action he needed to
take regarding the accident. Is Atty. Melissa subject to disciplinary action if she
eventually handles the case for him?
(A) No, because Melissa did not directly volunteer her services.
(B) ​No, because Manny happened to be a friend.
(C) Yes, she engaged in typical ambulance chasing.
(D) Yes, because she should have offered her services for free.
(30) A Court Administrator's auditing team found that Judge Ruby used business cards
which stated, in addition to her official title as presiding judge of her court, that she is
bar topnotcher, her law school’s "class valedictorian," and "one of the most sought after
private law practitioners" before she joined the judiciary, all of which are true. Asked to
explain this seeming impropriety, Ruby pointed out that business cards can include the
person’s "title" which is broad enough to include in her case her standing in the bar and
all the honors she earned. Did Ruby commit an impropriety?
(A) Yes, unless the cards were given to her as a gift.
(B) No, because all she stated in her business cards are true.
(C) ​Yes, because she showed a hunger for publicity and recognition that debases her
judicial post.
(D) No, because she is free to include in her business cards details that say who she is.
(31) Serving as counsel de oficio, Atty. Mamerto advised John of the consequences of
his plea of not guilty to the charge. Before trial could be held, however, the presiding
judge died. As it happened, Atty. Mamerto was appointed judge and John’s case was
assigned to him by raffle. John quickly moved for the judge’s disqualification. Is Judge
Mamerto under obligation to inhibit himself from the case?
(A) ​No, because his service to John was just momentary.
(B) Yes, because his knowledge of John’s case affects his judgment.
(C) No, because he was merely a counsel de oficio.
(D) Yes, because he served as John's counsel.
(32) Myra asked Atty. Elma to notarize her deed of sale. When Elma asked for Myra's
competent evidence of identity, she explained that she does not have any current
identification document nor could she get one soon. Instead, she presented her friend,
Alex, who showed Atty. Elma his driver’s license and confirmed her Myra’s identity. Is
Alex’s identification of Myra valid?
(A) Yes, provided Alex states in the deed of sale that he knew Myra personally.
(B) ​No, Myra needs to produce a valid identification document of herself.
(C) No, since Alex is not himself a party to the document.
(D) Yes, since Alex had a valid identification document.
(33) Atty. Eliseo represented Allan in a collection suit against the Philippine Charity
Sweepstakes Office (PCSO). After his election as sangguniang bayan member, the
court rendered a decision in PCSO’s favor. Still, Atty. Eliseo appeared for Allan in the
latter’s appeal, prompting the PCSO to question his right to do so. In response, Atty.
Eliseo claimed that the local government code authorizes him to practice law as long it
does not conflict with his duties. Is Atty. Eliseo right?
(A) ​No, because he cannot appear against a government instrumentality in a civil case.
(B) Yes, because his official duties do not conflict with his private practice.
(C) No, because he works on his private case at the sacrifice of public service.
(D) Yes, because he does not appear in the case as a municipal official.
(34) Which of the following instances demonstrates counsel’s LACK of diligence in
serving his client's interest?
(A) ​Failing to file his client’s appeal brief despite 2 extensions upon the excuse that the
client did not coordinate with him.
(B) Failing to send to client a requested legal opinion until after the latter gave him the
additional documents he requested.
(C) Failing to rehearse his client on his testimony before the trial.
(D) Updating his client about the status of his case by phone and electronic mail.
(35) What is the method of national inquiry into the conduct of Supreme Court
magistrates?
(A) Administrative investigation.
(B) Disqualification.
(C) ​Impeachment.
(D) Disbarment.
(36) What unhealthy attitude of mind should a judge avoid falling into?
(A) Hearing and adjudicating cases is an important job.
(B) Courts are made for litigants.
(C) ​Litigants are made for the courts.
(D) Courts should dispose of their cases on time.
(37) After hearing in a sensational criminal case, counsel for the accused told television
viewers how the judge unfairly ruled to stop his witness from testifying fully about certain
aspects of the case that would help the accused. Counsel said that the public should
know the injustice to which his client was being subjected. Can counsel be disciplined
for his utterances?
(A) Yes, because rather than defend the judicial system as was his duty, he attacked it.
(B) No, since counsel did not use obscene language.
(C) ​No, so long as counsel did not knowingly make false statements or act in reckless
disregard of truth.
(D) Yes, even if the judge may have actually made unfair rulings in the course of trial.
(38) Which of the following is required of counsel when withdrawing his services to a
client in a case?
(A) Counsel's desire to withdraw, expressed in his motion.
(B) Payment of withdrawal fee.
(C) Opposing counsel’s conformity to the withdrawal.
(D) ​Client's written consent filed in court.
(39) Which of the following demonstrates the lawyer's duty to give the court the respect
it deserves?
(A) Counsel consistently appearing in court on time.
(B) ​Counsel obeying court's orders and processes.
(C) Woman counsel appearing in court dressed in business attire.
(D) Counsel addressing the court as "Your Honor" at all times.
(40) Atty. Arthur agreed to represent Patrick in a personal injury case after the latter
signed a retainer agreement for a 33% fee contingent on their winning the case. In the
course of trial, Patrick dismissed Atty. Arthur after he presented their evidence in chief
and engaged Atty. Winston another lawyer. They lost the case. What fee would Atty.
Arthur be entitled to?
(A) Thirty three percent of the fee actually paid to Winston.
(B) The reasonable value of his services.
(C) A flat hourly rate for the time he invested in the case.
(D) ​Absolutely nothing.
(41) Ronnie, a paralegal in a law firm, helped Beth in a property dispute in which she
was involved by giving her legal advice and preparing a complaint that she eventually
filed in court under her own signature. When the lawyer for the defendant learned of it,
he told Ronnie to desist from practicing law. But he disputed this, claiming that he had
not practiced law since he did not receive compensation from Beth for his help. Is
Ronnie correct?
(A) Yes, because he could as a paralegal provide competent legal help to litigants.
(B) Yes, for so long as he did not sign the complaint or appeared as Beth's lawyer.
(C) No, unless Beth was ill-advised in filing her complaint in court.
(D) ​No, because receipt of compensation is not the sole determinant of legal practice.
(42) Which of the following characteristics pertains to a charging lien?
(A) ​It cannot attach to judgments for delivery of real estates.
(B) It involves documents placed in the lawyer's possession by reason of the retainer.
(C) It does not need any notice to the client to make it effective.
(D) It may be exercised before judgment or execution.
(43) To whom may the Supreme Court refer complaints against lawyers for
investigation?
(A) ​Integrated Bar of the Philippines.
(B) Office of the Bar Confidant.
(C) Judicial and Bar Council.
(D) Office of the Court Administrator.
(44) After several years as a private practitioner, Ben got appointed as Regional Trial
Court judge. Five years after his appointment, he received summons directing him to
answer a disbarment complaint that pertained to a document he notarized more than 10
years ago from appointment date. He sought the dismissal of the complaint arguing that
the cause of action has prescribed. Must the complaint be dismissed?
(A) ​No, because such complaints do not prescribe.
(B) Yes, because the complaint creates a chilling effect on judicial independence.
(C) No, but the complaint should be verified to ensure transparency.
(D) Yes, because actions on contracts prescribe in 10 years.
(45) On November 28 Atty. Patrick wrote in a newspaper column that the Supreme
Court already decided in favor of the validity of the Executive Order that created the
Truth Commission upon a vote of 13-2. But, as it turned out, the Court actually rendered
an adverse decision only on December 7, and upon a vote of 10-5. Asked to explain his
misleading article, Patrick said that his constitutionally protected right to free expression
covered what he wrote. Can the Court cite Patrick for contempt?
(A) ​Yes, because his article obstructs and degrades the administration of justice.
(B) No, because the right to free expression occupies a high rank in the hierarchy of
cherished rights.
(C) No, because courts must simply ignore public opinion and the media when
rendering decisions.
(D) Yes, because he wrote a lie in his column.
(46) Atty. Ramon borrowed his client's (Menchu) land title. After eight months, Menchu
demanded its return but he failed to comply and changed his residence. After Menchu
tracked him down, she confronted him about the title. He then offered to just buy the
property and gave her five checks for it but these bounced. Charged with malpractice,
Atty. Ramon answered that his license to practice law cannot be in issue. He merely
incurred civil liability for a failed transaction. Will the malpractice action prosper?
(A) No, because his failure to pay his obligation only makes him civilly liable.
(B) No, since Menchu did not transact business with Atty. Ramon as a lawyer.
(C) Yes, because it is professionally reprehensible for a lawyer to be unavailable to a
person in need.
(D) ​Yes, he having taken advantage of Menchu who was not fully protected and had no
independent advice.
(47) Atty. Alfredo Prado appeared in a case as legal officer of the Land Registration
Authority (LRA). His opponent, Atty. Armando, knew an Atty. Alfredo Prado from his
province who had been dead for years. When Atty. Armando checked with the Supreme
Court, only one Alfredo Prado was in the roll of attorneys. What action can Atty. Armado
take against Vicente who had taken a dead lawyer’s identity?
(A) File direct contempt action against Vicente for deceiving the court.
(B) ​Criminally prosecute Vicente for estafa for making money upon false pretense.
(C) Criminally prosecute Vicente for theft of Alfredo's identity and law practice.
(D) Institute a disbarment case against Vicente for misrepresenting himself as lawyer.
(48) After the prosecution cross-examined Shiela, a witness for the accused, Judge
Pedro asked her ten additional questions that were so intense they made her cry. One
question forced Sheila to admit that her mother was living with another man, a fact that
weighed on the case of the accused. This prompted the latter’s counsel to move to
expunge the judge’s questions for building on the prosecution's case. Judge Pedro
denied the motion, insisting that bolstering a party’s case is incidental to the court’s
desire to be clarified. Did Pedro commit an impropriety?
(A) No, his ten questions could not be considered an undue intervention.
(B) No, because the judge is free to inquire into any aspect of the case that would clarify
the evidence for him.
(C) ​Yes, because he effectively deprived the defense of its right to due process when he
acted both as prosecutor and judge.
(D) Yes, because nothing connects his desire to be clarified with the questions he
asked.
(49) Administrative penalties imposed on judges are
(A) curative.
(B) punitive.
(C) corrective.
(D) ​both punitive and corrective.
(50) Which of the following demonstrates a lawyer’s fidelity to known practices and
customs of the bar regarding a case he is handling?
(A) Treating his client’s disclosures as confidential but not the documents he submits for
review.
(B) Meeting with his client’s opponent over lunch to discuss settlement without telling his
client.
(C) ​Accepting a tough case although he is new in practice, trusting that his diligence
would make up for lack of experience.
(D) Inviting the judge hearing the case to dinner with no purpose to discuss the case
with him.

1. Atty. Galing is a BAtty. Galing is a Bar topnotcher. He has been teaching major
subjects in a law school for eight (8) years and has mastered the subjects he is
handling. Is he exempt from the MCLE requirement?
1. No, eight (8) years experience is not enough.
2. Yes, since he has mastered what he is handling.
3. Yes, professors of law are exempted.
4. No, since he is not yet a Bar reviewer.
2. Atty. Rey has been a professor in the Legal Management Department of Y
University for thirty (30) years. He teaches Constitution, Obligation and
Contracts, Insurance, Introduction to Law. Is he exempted from the MCLE
requirement?
1. Yes, because his teaching experience is already more than ten (10) years.
2. No, because he is not teaching in the College of Law.
3. Yes, because of his field of knowledge and experience.
4. No, because Y University is not accredited.
3. The term of Dean Rex of X College of Law expired in the first year of the third
compliance period. Does his exemption extend to the full extent of said
compliance period?
1. No, he must comply with all the unit requirements.
2. Yes, to the full extent.
3. No, but comply proportionately.
4. Yes, but he must apply for exemption.
4. What is the duration of MCLE Compliance Period?
1. Twelve (12) months;
2. Twenty four (24) months;
3. Thirty six (36) months;
4. Eighteen (18) months.
5. When does compliance period begin?
1. When the lawyer actually begins law practice;
2. Upon admission/readmission to the Bar;
3. 01 October 2009;
4. 01 October 2006.
6. Does the MCLE requirement apply at once to a newly-admitted lawyer?
1. Yes, if admitted to the Bar and there are four (4) more months remaining
of the compliance period.
2. No, wait for the next compliance period.
3. Yes, if he will start law practice immediately.
4. Yes, if more than one (1) year remains of the compliance period.
7. What is the purpose of MCLE?
1. To conform with the requirements of international law.
2. To provide a venue to improve fraternal relations among lawyers.
3. To keep abreast with law and jurisprudence and to maintain the ethical
standards of the profession.
4. To supplement legal knowledge due to substandard law schools.
8. Atty. Aga was appointed as Treasurer by the IBP President with the approval of
the Board of Governors for a term coterminous with that of the President. A year
thereafter, Atty. Aga ran as Barangay Chairman of their place, and took a leave
of absence for two (2) weeks to campaign. May Atty. Aga re-assume as
Treasurer after his leave of absence?
1. Yes, since he lost in the election.
2. No, because he was deemed resigned upon filing of his certificate of
candidacy.
3. Yes, because his position as Treasurer is coterminous with the President
of the I BP.
4. No, because he should first seek the approval of the IBP Board of
Governors before running as Brgy. Chairman.
9. Atty. Magtanggol of the PAO was assigned to defend X who is accused of Slight
Physical Injury before the MTC of a far-flung town. During the trial, P02 Tulco
appeared in court on behalf of the complainant. Atty. Magtanggol objected to his
appearance since the policeman is not a member of the Bar.
1. The objection is valid. It should be the public prosecutor who should
prosecute the criminal action.
2. Atty. Magtanggol is just afraid that his client may be convicted through the
efforts of a non-lawyer.
3. In the courts of a municipality, a party may conduct his litigation in person
or with the aid of an agent or friend.
4. If a public prosecutor is not available, at least a private prosecutor who
must be a lawyer should be designated.
10. Bong Tupak, a second year law student, was charged in the RTC for Forcible
Abduction with Rape. Having knowledge of criminal law and procedure, he
dismissed the counsel de oficio assigned and appeared for himself. He asserted
that there was lack of force. Eventually, the RTC found him guilty of Consented
Abduction and imposed the penalty. Bong Tupak now assails the decision,
saying that there was a violation of due process because he was allowed to
appear by himself and he did not know that Consented Abduction is a crime.
Decide.
1. An accused before the RTC may opt to defend himself in person and he
cannot fault others for his decision.
2. The RTC should have appointed a counsel de oficio to assist the accused
even if not sought or requested by the accused.
3. There was violation of due process. There is disparity between the
expertise of a public prosecutor and the inexperience of a 2nd year law
student.
 4. A 2nd year law student has sufficient knowledge of criminal law and
procedure, hence, he is competent to defend himself.
11. RTC Judge Bell was so infuriated by the conduct of Atty. X who conveniently
absents himself when his clients do not pay his appearance fee in advance. Atty.
X also uses disrespectful and obscene language in his pleadings . . At one point,
when his case was called for hearing, Atty. X did not appear for his client
although he was just outside the door of the court room. Judge Bell directed the
client to summon Atty. X, but the latter refused. Judge Bell then issued an Order
directing Atty. X to explain why no disciplinary action shall be imposed on him for
this misconduct but he refused the directive. Decide.
1. RTC Judge Bell can suspend Atty. X from the practice of law before his
sala.
2. The case of Atty. X can be dismissed due to non-appearance of counsel
even though the party was present.
3. The hearing of the case should be rescheduled in the interest of justice.
4. The court can admonish the client for the unprofessional conduct of his
lawyer and ask him to change his lawyer.
12. Debbie, topnotcher of their class, is now on her 4th year law studies and has
enrolled in the legal aid clinic of the law school. She was assigned to handle a
domestic violence and support case filed by their client against her husband.
During the hearing, the clinic's supervising attorney introduced Debbie to the
Branch Clerk of Court and then left to oversee another intern. In the midst of the
proceedings, opposing counsel objected to the appearance of Debbie because
she is not yet a lawyer. Decide.
1. Debbie can proceed because the law student practice rule allows a
student who has finished 3rd year of the regular course to appear without
compensation before a trial court.
2. Debbie can proceed since she is appearing only during the trial and did
not sign the pleadings.
3. Debbie cannot proceed without the presence of their clinic's supervising
attorney.
4. Debbie has proven her capability to handle the case and opposing
counsel is objecting only now because he might lose to a law student.
13. Atty. Quiso was the retained counsel for Alfa Security Agency and handled all the
cases involving the company. Adam, the Assistant Manager of the agency, hired
Atty. Quiso when he was sued in an ejectment case. Later, Adam was fired from
the agency. Adam did not return a vehicle and so, Atty. Quiso - as counsel for the
security agency - filed a replevin suit Adam moved for Atty. Quiso's
disqualification considering that the ejectment case is still pending. Is there
conflict of interest?
1. No, the cases are totally unrelated and there is no occasion to unduly use
confidential information acquired from one case in the other.
2. No, Atty. Quiso is duty bound to handle a !I cases of his client, including
the replevin case against Adam.
 3. Yes, proscription is against representation of opposing parties who are
present clients or in an unrelated action.
4. Yes, Atty. Quiso must withdraw as counsel for Adam, otherwise he will
lose his retainer
14. Mr. Joseph, owner of an investment house, consulted a friend , Atty. Miro, about
a potential criminal act1on against him because he cannot pay investors due to
temporary liquidity problems. Atty. Miro asked Mr. Joseph to transfer to him all
assets of the firm and he will take charge of settling the claims and getting
quitclaims. A month later, Mr. Joseph was surprised to receive a demand letter
from Atty. Miro , as counsel for all the claimants , for the pay back of their
investments. After a while, Mr. Joseph received releases and quitclaims from the
investors, with desistance from filing criminal action against him. Atty. Miro later
told Mr. Joseph that he sent the demand letter so he can claim attorney's fee.
Was there a conflict of interest?
1. No, there was no formal engagement of Atty. Miro as counsel for Mr.
Joseph.
2. Yes, by giving legal advice to Mr. Joseph, the latter became a client of
Atty. Miro.
3. No, there is no attorney-client relationship between Mr. Joseph and Atty.·
Miro as no attorney's fee was charged nor paid to the latter.
4. Yes, because Atty. Miro was representing Mr. Joseph when he disposed
the assets to pay off the claims.
15. Atty. Gelly passed the Bar 1n 1975. After taking his oath, he did not enlist in any
IBP chapter because he went to the USA to pursue a Master's Degree.
Eventually, he passed the state bar and specialized in lmmigration law. In 2005.
he returned to the Philippines and was but the IBP is charging him from 1975 up
to the present and threatening him with expulsion if he does not comply. Is the
IBP correct?
1. Atty. Gelly cannot be compelled to pay the IBP dues because he was not
engaged in the practice of law from 1975-2005.
2. Atty. Gelly is exempt from 1975-2005 because he was out of the country.
3. Atty. Gelly should pay the dues from 1975 to the present since
membership in the IBP is compulsary.
4. Atty. Gelly should not pay because the rule on bar integration is
unconstitutional for compelling a lawyer to join an association.
16. Mr. Joey owns a 5-hectare parcel of land which is being expropriated as market
site. The government is offering only Php 15 per sqm while Mr. Joey deserves
Php 20 per sqm. Atty. AI agreed to represent Mr. Joey in the expropriation case
on contingent basis in that his attorney's fees shall be the excess of Php 20 per
sqm. Due to expert handling, the expropriation court awarded Mr. Joey the fair
market value of Php 35 per sqm. Mr. Joey complained to the court that the
attorney's fee being charged is excessive as it amounts to about 63°/o of the
award. Decide.
1. A retainer's agreement, as a contract, has the force of law between the
parties and must be complied with in good faith.
 2. It was the excellent handling of the case that resulted in a bigger award;
hence, it is fair that Atty. AI should be rewarded with the excess.
3. Mr. Joey got the desired valuation for his land. So, he must honor his
contract with Atty. AI.
4. Attorney's fees is always subject to court supervision and may be reduced
by the court based on quantum meruit.
17. Atty. Atras was the counsel for Mr. Abante. Soon after the case was submitted
for decision, Mr. Abante got the files and informed Atty. Atras that he was hiring
another lawyer. On that same day, a copy of the decision was received by Atty.
Atras but he did not do anything anymore. He also' failed to file his withdrawal,
and no appearance was made by the new counsel. When Mr. Abante found out
about the adverse decision, the period to appeal had lapsed. Was service to Atty.
Atras effective?
1. Yes, Atty. Atras is still considered the counsel of record until his
withdrawal of appearance has been actually filed and granted.
2. Service should be done on Mr. Abante because he had already severed
lawyer-client relationship with Atty. Atras.
3. Service should be done on the new counsel as soon as he enters his
appearance.
4. Service upon Atty. Atras is not effective because his services have already
been terminated by the client.
18. Atty. Utang borrowed from Y Php 300,000.00 secured by a post dated check.
When presented, the check was dishonored. Y filed a BP 22 case in court, and a
disbarment complaint with the IBP. In the latter case, Atty. Utang moved for
dismissal as the act has nothing to do with his being. a lawyer and that it is
premature because the case is pending and he is entitled to presumption of
innocence. Should the disbarment complaint be dismissed?
1. No, because lawyers may be disciplined for all acts, whether professional
or private.
2. Yes, there is no conviction yet.
3. Yes, BP 22 does not involve moral turpitude.
4. No, unless he pays the amount of the check to the satisfaction of Y.
19. Atty. Juan Cruz of the Cruz, Cruz and Cruz Law Office personally handled a
damage case of Mr. Gonzalo which resulted in an award of Php 500,000.00. The
writ of execution was served by Sheriff Onoy, but resulted in recovery of only Php
70,000.00. Mr. Gonzalo was unsatisfied and filed an administrative complaint.
When informed, Sheriff Onoy berated and threatened Mr. Gonzalo; and for this,
the Sheriff was charged with Grave Threat. Atty. Pedro Cruz of the same Cruz,
Ci·uz and Cruz Law Office appeared as defense counsel pro bono. Mr. Gonzalo
seeks his disqualification. Decide.
1. No conflict of interest. The Grave Threat case arose out of a different
factual scenario.
2. There is conflict of interest because both Atty. Juan Cruz and Atty. Pedro
Cruz belong to one law office.
 3. No conflict of interest since the court case was wholly handled by Atty.
Juan Cruz. The law office did not participate in any way.
4. No conflict of interest. No likelihood that information in the civil case can
be used in the criminal case.
20. Atty. Lorna, a legal officer of a government agency, and Chona, a nurse in the
medical department, were best friends. At one time, Chona consulted Atty. Lorna
about a legal matter, revealing that she is living with a married man and that she
has a child out of wedlock fathered by another man. Later, the relation between
Atty. Lorna and Chona soured. When Chona applied for promotion, Atty. Lorna
filed immorality charges against Chona utilizing solely the disclosure by the latter
of her private life. Chona objected and invoked confidentiality of information from
attorney-client relationship. Decide.
1. There is no attorney-client relationship because, being in the government,
Atty. Lorna is disallowed from practicing her profession.
2. No lawyer-client relationship privilege because the information was given
as a friend, and not as a lawyer.
3. Personal secrets revealed to Atty. Lorna for the purpose of seeking legal.
advice is covered by attorney-client privilege.
4. There is no attorney-client relationship because no attorney's fee was paid
to Atty. Lorna.
21. Atty. Nelson recently passed the Bar and wanted to specialize in marine labor
law. He gave out calling cards with his name, address and telephone number in
front, and the following words at the back: "We provide legal assistance to
overseas seamen who are repatriated due to accident, illness, injury, or death.
We also offer FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE." Does this constitute ethical
misconduct?
1. No, clients have freedom in the selection of their counsel.
2. No, use of a professional card is a lawful way of announcing his services
as a professional.
3. Yes, because the offer of financial assistance is an undignified way of
luring clients.
4. Yes, because the offer of assistance is stated at the back.
22. Which of these does not constitute competent evidence of identity?
1. Passport;
2. SSS card;
3. Community Tax Certificate;
4. Senior Citizen Card.
23. A recovery of ownership complaint was filed by the Dedo and Dedo Law Firm,
through Atty. Jose Dedo as counsel. During all the phases of trial, it was Atty.
Jose Dedo who appeared. Unfortunately, Atty. Jose Dedo died before completion
of trial. Notices and orders sent to the Dedo and Dedo Law Firm were returned to
the court with the manifestation that Atty. Dedo already died and requesting the
court to directly send the matters to the client. Is this proper?
1. No, the law firm- through another lawyer - should continue to appear for
the client.
 2. Yes, because the death of the handling lawyer terminates the
attorney-client relationship.
3. Yes, because attorney's fees was not paid to the law firm.
4. No, it will be unjust for the client to pay another lawyer.
24. Which of these is not a ground for disbarment?
1. Conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude.
2. Belligerent disobedience to a lawful order of a trial court.
3. Malpractice or other gross misconduct in office.
4. Grossly immoral conduct.
25. (unread text)
26. Supreme Court are handled by:
1. Clerk of Court of the Supreme Court
2. Ombudsman
3. Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeals
4. Office of the Court Administrator
27. Atty. Aimee was convicted by final judgment of Estafa Thru Falsification of a
Commercial Document, a crime involving moral turpitude. What is the
appropriate penalty?
1. Disbarment ·
2. Indefinite suspension
3. Suspension for three (3) years
4. Admonition
28. During the IBP Chapter elections, the candidates for President were Atty. EJ, a
labor arbiter of the NLRC, Fiscal RJ of the DOJ and Atty. Gani of the PAO. After
canvass, Fiscal RJ garnered the highest number of votes, followed by Arbiter EJ
and by Atty. Gani. The winning Vice-President moved for the annulment of the
election for President because all the candidates for President are government
officials and are disqualified. Decide.
1. The election for presidency is invalid, and the elected Vice-President shall
assume the Presidency by succession.
2. The election is a failure, and new elections should be held.
3. Fiscal RJ and Arbiter EJ are disqualified. Atty. Gani should be declared
winner.
4. All the candidates who are government officials are deemed resigned
upon their acceptance of nomination; and so, Fiscal RJ is winner.
29. Atty. Edad is an 85 year old lawyer. He does not practice law anymore. However,
his IBP Chapter continues to send him notices to pay his IBP dues of more than
ten (1 0) years with warning that failure to comply will result in the removal of his
name. Piqued by this, Atty. Edad filed with the IBP Secretary a sworn letter
notifying that he is voluntarily terminating his membership with the IBP. Should
he be allowed?
1. No, because membership in IBP is compulsory for all lawyers.
2. Yes, an erstwhile IBP member may terminate his membership for good
reasons.
3. No, that is only a ploy to evade payment of IBP dues.
 4. Yes, it will violate his right not to join an association.
30. Who elects the members of the Board of Governors of the IBP?
1. The Presidents of all IBP Chapters;
2. The members at large of the IBP;
3. The House of Delegates;
4. The Past Presidents of all IBP chapters.
31. Who elects the President and Vice-President of the IBP?
1. The President of all IBP Chapters;
2. The IBP members voting at large;
3. The Board of Governors;
4. The outgoing IBP officers.
32. A judge or judicial officer is disqualified to hear a case before him wherein a party
is related to him by consanguinity or affinity -
1. up to the 6th degree;
2. up to the 5th degree;
3. up to the 4th degree;
4. up to the 3rd degree.
33. A judge or judicial .officer should inhibit himself from hearing a case before him
where the counsel for either party is a relative by consanguinity or affinity -
1. up to the 3rd degree;
2. up to the 4th degree;
3. up to the 5th degree;
4. up to the 6th degree.
34. Victor has been legally separated from his wife, Belen for fifteen (15) years. He
has found true love and happiness with Amor and they lived together as husband
and wife. Amor convinced Victor to study law and gave him financial support.
Recently, Victor passed the 2011 Bar Examinations. Upon knowing this, Belen
filed a complaint against Victor for immorality. Should Victor be allowed to take
oath as an attorney?
1. Yes, his relationship with Amor is imbued with genuine love and cannot be
considered immoral and indecent.
2. Yes, legal separation does not allow the spouses to remarry.
3. No, because legal separation does not dissolve the marriage and,
therefore, Victor's relationship with Amor is still considered illicit.
4. Yes, it is totally unfair for Belen to complain since they have lived separate
lives.
35. Judge Nacy personally witnessed a vehicular accident near his house. Later, the
Reckless Imprudence case was raffled to his sala. Is there a valid ground for his
inhibition?
1. No. he is not acquainted nor related with any of the parties or lawyer.
2. No, his personal knowledge of what actually happened will even ensure
that he will decide the case justly on the basis of the true facts.
3. Yes, because a judge should decide a case on the basis of the evidence
presented before him and not on extraneous matters.
 4. No, because there is no ground for disqualification and no motion for
inhibition.
36. Judge Ramon obtained a two (2) year car loan from a financing company. He
never paid a single amortization. After the lapse of two (2) years, the financing
company filed an administrative complaint against the judge for willful failure to
pay a just debt. Is the judge administratively liable?
1. No, since the loan is not connected with his judicial function.
2. Yes, because a judge should avoid impropriety or the appearance of
impropriety even in his private dealings.
3. No, the financing company should have availed of the remedy of
foreclosure.
4. No, because the administrative charge is only meant to force the judge to
pay.
37. Bong, son of Judge Rey, is a fourth year law student. He helped his friend
prepare an affidavit-complaint for Violation of Batas Pambansa Big. 22. After
drafting, they showed it to Judge Rey who made some corrections. Later, the BP
22 case was raffled to Judge Rey who tried and convicted the accused. Was
there impropriety?
1. Yes, since Judge Rey was not a fair and impartial judge.
2. No, the evidence for the prosecution was strong and sufficient to prove
guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
3. No, because any other judge would also have convicted the accused.
4. No, those matters were not known to the accused.
38. Atty. Fred is a law practitioner and headed a law firm bearing his name and those
of his partners. When Atty. Fred was elected as Congressman, his client's needs
were handled by the other partners. Later, A, a newly proclaimed
congressman-friend , faced an election protest before the HRET, and sought the
help of Congressman Fred who immediately directed his law firm to appear for A.
8, the protestant, sought the disqualification of Congressman Fred's law firm from
appearing before the HRET because Congressman Fred is prohibited from
practicing his profession. Decide.
1. Yes, Congressman Fred's law firm is disqualified because Congressman
Fred may exercise undue influence on his peers who are members of
HRET.
2. No, the law firm is not disqualified because it is another partner, and not
Congressman Fred who is appearing.
3. No, the prohibition is on Congressman Fred from personally appearing,
and not to his partners.
4. Yes, the spirit of the prohibition is clearly to avoid influence and cannot be
indirectly circumvented.
39. Vice-Mayor Ron is a well-loved law practitioner because he assists his
constituents, especially the indigents. Ed, one of his friends who is employed as
Cashier in the Register of Deeds, sought his assistance because he was charged
with Malversation in court. Can Vice-Mayor Ron appear as counsel of Ed?
1. Yes, members of the Sanggunian are allowed to practice their profession.
 2. No, because Ed is charged with an offense in relation to his office.
3. Yes, since the position of Ed does not pertain to the local government.
4. No, because all criminal cases are against the government.
40. Atty. Noe was elected Vice-Governor and continued with his law practice. Later,
the governor went on sick leave for one (1) year and Atty. Noe was designated
as Acting Governor. Since hearings have already been set, can Atty. Noe
continue appearing as counsel in the cases handled by him?
1. Yes, because his election is only as Vice-Governor, and his delegation as
Governor is only temporary.
2. Yes, but only for the hearings that have already been set.
3. Yes, provided Atty. Noe seeks the permission of DILG.
4. No, all governors- even under acting capacity- are prohibited from
exercising their profession.
41. Atty. Dude is the COMELEC Officer in a very distant municipality. He is. the only
lawyer in that area. When election period is over, he has much spare time. Many
people go to him for counseling, legal advice, preparation of documents of Sale,
Mortgage and the like. He does not charge a fee in money, but he receives gifts
which are offered. Is there impropriety?
1. Yes, giving legal advice and preparing legal documents, even if free,
constitutes private practice of law, which is prohibited of government
employees.
2. No, it is only giving of advices, and not court appearance.
3. Yes, because Atty. Dude accepts gifts.
4. No, since Atty. Dude does not accept money.
42. A notary public is required to record chronologically the notarial acts that he
performs in the:
1. Notarial Book;
2. Roll of Documents Notarized;
3. Notarial Register;
4. Notarial Loose Leafs Sheets.
43. A party to a contract does not know how to write. Neither can he affix his
thumbmark because both hands were amputated. How will that person execute
the contract?
1. Ask the party to affix a mark using the toe of his foot in the presence of the
notary public and two (2) disinterested and unaffected witnesses to the
instrument.
2. Ask the party to hold the pen with his teeth and affix a + mark to be
followed by the signature of one friend.
3. The party may ask the notary public to sign in his behalf.
4. None of the above.
44. The reports of a Notary Public are submitted to the:
1. Executive Judge;
2. Court Administrator;
3. Notarial Archives;
4. Clerk of Court.
45. Atty. Tony is a 25 year old Filipino lawyer. He has been a resident in Paranaque
City for about ten (1 0) years and holds office in his residence. He filed a petition
for appointment as Notary Public in Paranaque and has clearance from the I BP
and the Bar Confidant. However, it appears that while still a college student, he
was convicted by a Laguna Court for Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Damage
to Property. During the summary hearing of his petition, the offended party
therein strongly objected on that ground. Can Atty. Tony be appointed?
1. No, because he has a previous criminal record.
2. No, because of the opposition.
3. Yes, the offense of Reckless Imprudence does not involve moral turpitude.
4. Yes, since the Reckless Imprudence case did not happen in the
jurisdiction where Atty. Tony is applying.
46. What is the effect when the parties to a document acknowledged before a notary
public did not present competent evidence of identity?
1. Voidable;
2. Valid;
3. Invalid Notarization;
4. Unenforceable.
47. The petition for appointment as a notary public should be filed with:
1. The Office of the Court Administrator;
2. The Clerk of Court;
3. The MeTC Executive Judge;
4. The RTC Executive Judge.
48. What is a retaining lien?
1. The lawyer who handled the case during the trial stage should continue to
be retained up to the appeal.
2. The right of the lawyer to be retained as counsel for a party until the entire
case is finished.
3. The right of a lawyer who is discharged or withdrawn to keep the records
and property of the client in his possession until his lawful services have
been paid.
4. The prerogative of a client's retainer to recover out-of-pocket expenses.
49. For grave misconduct, a lawyer was suspended from the practice of law
indefinitely. Is he still obliged to pay his IBP dues during his suspension?
1. Yes, as he continues to be a lawyer and a member of the IBP.
2. No, because indefinite suspension is practically disbarment.
3. No need to pay IBP dues because he cannot practice anyway.
4. Pay only after the lifting of the suspension, if it comes.
50. Because of his political beliefs, Atty. Guerra joined a rebel group. Later, he was
apprehended and charged with Rebellion in court. A disbarment case was also
filed against him. While the case was pending, the government approved a
general amnesty program and Atty. Guerra applied for and was granted amnesty.
Should the disbarment case be also dismissed automatically?
1. Yes, because amnesty obliterates the criminal act.
 2. No, disciplinary action on lawyers are sui generis and general penal
principles do not strictly apply.
3. No, a lawyer has the duty to maintain allegiance to the Republic of the
Philippines and to support the Constitution and obey the laws of the
Philippines.
4. Yes, if the Secretary of Justice approves the dismissal.
51. Soon after Atty. Cesar passed the Philippine Bar in 1975, he also took the New
York State Bar and passed the same. He practiced law for 25 years in the USA,
but he was disbarred therein for insurance fraud. He returned to the Philippines
and started to practice law. X, who knew about his New York disbarment, filed a
disbarment complaint with the IBP. Decide.
1. The factual basis for the New York disbarment which is deceitalso
constitutes a ground for disbarment in the Philippines.
2. The acts complained of happened in a foreign country and cannot be
penalized here.
3. Norms of ethical behavior of lawyers are the same worldwide.
4. A lawyer's fitness to become a lawyer must be maintained wherever he
may be.
52. ar topnotcher. He has been teaching major subjects in a law school for eight (8)
years and has mastered the subjects he is handling. Is he exempt from the
MCLE requirement?
1. No, eight (8) years experience is not enough.
2. Yes, since he has mastered what he is handling.
3. Yes, professors of law are exempted.
4. No, since he is not yet a Bar reviewer.
53. Atty. Rey has been a professor in the Legal Management Department of Y
University for thirty (30) years. He teaches Constitution, Obligation and
Contracts, Insurance, Introduction to Law. Is he exempted from the MCLE
requirement?
1. Yes, because his teaching experience is already more than ten (10) years.
2. No, because he is not teaching in the College of Law.
3. Yes, because of his field of knowledge and experience.
4. No, because Y University is not accredited.
54. The term of Dean Rex of X College of Law expired in the first year of the third
compliance period. Does his exemption extend to the full extent of said
compliance period?
1. No, he must comply with all the unit requirements.
2. Yes, to the full extent.
3. No, but comply proportionately.
4. Yes, but he must apply for exemption.
55. What is the duration of MCLE Compliance Period?
1. Twelve (12) months;
2. Twenty four (24) months;
3. Thirty six (36) months;
4. Eighteen (18) months.
56. When does compliance period begin?
1. When the lawyer actually begins law practice;
2. Upon admission/readmission to the Bar;
3. 01 October 2009;
4. 01 October 2006.
57. Does the MCLE requirement apply at once to a newly-admitted lawyer?
1. Yes, if admitted to the Bar and there are four (4) more months remaining
of the compliance period.
2. No, wait for the next compliance period.
3. Yes, if he will start law practice immediately.
4. Yes, if more than one (1) year remains of the compliance period.
58. What is the purpose of MCLE?
1. To conform with the requirements of international law.
2. To provide a venue to improve fraternal relations among lawyers.
3. To keep abreast with law and jurisprudence and to maintain the ethical
standards of the profession.
4. To supplement legal knowledge due to substandard law schools.
59. Atty. Aga was appointed as Treasurer by the IBP President with the approval of
the Board of Governors for a term coterminous with that of the President. A year
thereafter, Atty. Aga ran as Barangay Chairman of their place, and took a leave
of absence for two (2) weeks to campaign. May Atty. Aga re-assume as
Treasurer after his leave of absence?
1. Yes, since he lost in the election.
2. No, because he was deemed resigned upon filing of his certificate of
candidacy.
3. Yes, because his position as Treasurer is coterminous with the President
of the I BP.
4. No, because he should first seek the approval of the IBP Board of
Governors before running as Brgy. Chairman.
60. Atty. Magtanggol of the PAO was assigned to defend X who is accused of Slight
Physical Injury before the MTC of a far-flung town. During the trial, P02 Tulco
appeared in court on behalf of the complainant. Atty. Magtanggol objected to his
appearance since the policeman is not a member of the Bar.
1. The objection is valid. It should be the public prosecutor who should
prosecute the criminal action.
2. Atty. Magtanggol is just afraid that his client may be convicted through the
efforts of a non-lawyer.
3. In the courts of a municipality, a party may conduct his litigation in person
or with the aid of an agent or friend.
4. If a public prosecutor is not available, at least a private prosecutor who
must be a lawyer should be designated.
61. Bong Tupak, a second year law student, was charged in the RTC for Forcible
Abduction with Rape. Having knowledge of criminal law and procedure, he
dismissed the counsel de oficio assigned and appeared for himself. He asserted
that there was lack of force. Eventually, the RTC found him guilty of Consented
 Abduction and imposed the penalty. Bong Tupak now assails the decision,
saying that there was a violation of due process because he was allowed to
appear by himself and he did not know that Consented Abduction is a crime.
Decide.
1. An accused before the RTC may opt to defend himself in person and he
cannot fault others for his decision.
2. The RTC should have appointed a counsel de oficio to assist the accused
even if not sought or requested by the accused.
3. There was violation of due process. There is disparity between the
expertise of a public prosecutor and the inexperience of a 2nd year law
student.
4. A 2nd year law student has sufficient knowledge of criminal law and
procedure, hence, he is competent to defend himself.
62. RTC Judge Bell was so infuriated by the conduct of Atty. X who conveniently
absents himself when his clients do not pay his appearance fee in advance. Atty.
X also uses disrespectful and obscene language in his pleadings . . At one point,
when his case was called for hearing, Atty. X did not appear for his client
although he was just outside the door of the court room. Judge Bell directed the
client to summon Atty. X, but the latter refused. Judge Bell then issued an Order
directing Atty. X to explain why no disciplinary action shall be imposed on him for
this misconduct but he refused the directive. Decide.
1. RTC Judge Bell can suspend Atty. X from the practice of law before his
sala.
2. The case of Atty. X can be dismissed due to non-appearance of counsel
even though the party was present.
3. The hearing of the case should be rescheduled in the interest of justice.
4. The court can admonish the client for the unprofessional conduct of his
lawyer and ask him to change his lawyer.
63. Debbie, topnotcher of their class, is now on her 4th year law studies and has
enrolled in the legal aid clinic of the law school. She was assigned to handle a
domestic violence and support case filed by their client against her husband.
During the hearing, the clinic's supervising attorney introduced Debbie to the
Branch Clerk of Court and then left to oversee another intern. In the midst of the
proceedings, opposing counsel objected to the appearance of Debbie because
she is not yet a lawyer. Decide.
1. Debbie can proceed because the law student practice rule allows a
student who has finished 3rd year of the regular course to appear without
compensation before a trial court.
2. Debbie can proceed since she is appearing only during the trial and did
not sign the pleadings.
3. Debbie cannot proceed without the presence of their clinic's supervising
attorney.
4. Debbie has proven her capability to handle the case and opposing
counsel is objecting only now because he might lose to a law student.
64. Atty. Quiso was the retained counsel for Alfa Security Agency and handled all the
cases involving the company. Adam, the Assistant Manager of the agency, hired
Atty. Quiso when he was sued in an ejectment case. Later, Adam was fired from
the agency. Adam did not return a vehicle and so, Atty. Quiso - as counsel for the
security agency - filed a replevin suit Adam moved for Atty. Quiso's
disqualification considering that the ejectment case is still pending. Is there
conflict of interest?
1. No, the cases are totally unrelated and there is no occasion to unduly use
confidential information acquired from one case in the other.
2. No, Atty. Quiso is duty bound to handle a !I cases of his client, including
the replevin case against Adam.
3. Yes, proscription is against representation of opposing parties who are
present clients or in an unrelated action.
4. Yes, Atty. Quiso must withdraw as counsel for Adam, otherwise he will
lose his retainer
65. Mr. Joseph, owner of an investment house, consulted a friend , Atty. Miro, about
a potential criminal act1on against him because he cannot pay investors due to
temporary liquidity problems. Atty. Miro asked Mr. Joseph to transfer to him all
assets of the firm and he will take charge of settling the claims and getting
quitclaims. A month later, Mr. Joseph was surprised to receive a demand letter
from Atty. Miro , as counsel for all the claimants , for the pay back of their
investments. After a while, Mr. Joseph received releases and quitclaims from the
investors, with desistance from filing criminal action against him. Atty. Miro later
told Mr. Joseph that he sent the demand letter so he can claim attorney's fee.
Was there a conflict of interest?
1. No, there was no formal engagement of Atty. Miro as counsel for Mr.
Joseph.
2. Yes, by giving legal advice to Mr. Joseph, the latter became a client of
Atty. Miro.
3. No, there is no attorney-client relationship between Mr. Joseph and Atty.·
Miro as no attorney's fee was charged nor paid to the latter.
4. Yes, because Atty. Miro was representing Mr. Joseph when he disposed
the assets to pay off the claims.
66. Atty. Gelly passed the Bar 1n 1975. After taking his oath, he did not enlist in any
IBP chapter because he went to the USA to pursue a Master's Degree.
Eventually, he passed the state bar and specialized in lmmigration law. In 2005.
he returned to the Philippines and was but the IBP is charging him from 1975 up
to the present and threatening him with expulsion if he does not comply. Is the
IBP correct?
1. Atty. Gelly cannot be compelled to pay the IBP dues because he was not
engaged in the practice of law from 1975-2005.
2. Atty. Gelly is exempt from 1975-2005 because he was out of the country.
3. Atty. Gelly should pay the dues from 1975 to the present since
membership in the IBP is compulsary.
 4. Atty. Gelly should not pay because the rule on bar integration is
unconstitutional for compelling a lawyer to join an association.
67. Mr. Joey owns a 5-hectare parcel of land which is being expropriated as market
site. The government is offering only Php 15 per sqm while Mr. Joey deserves
Php 20 per sqm. Atty. AI agreed to represent Mr. Joey in the expropriation case
on contingent basis in that his attorney's fees shall be the excess of Php 20 per
sqm. Due to expert handling, the expropriation court awarded Mr. Joey the fair
market value of Php 35 per sqm. Mr. Joey complained to the court that the
attorney's fee being charged is excessive as it amounts to about 63°/o of the
award. Decide.
1. A retainer's agreement, as a contract, has the force of law between the
parties and must be complied with in good faith.
2. It was the excellent handling of the case that resulted in a bigger award;
hence, it is fair that Atty. AI should be rewarded with the excess.
3. Mr. Joey got the desired valuation for his land. So, he must honor his
contract with Atty. AI.
4. Attorney's fees is always subject to court supervision and may be reduced
by the court based on quantum meruit.
68. Atty. Atras was the counsel for Mr. Abante. Soon after the case was submitted
for decision, Mr. Abante got the files and informed Atty. Atras that he was hiring
another lawyer. On that same day, a copy of the decision was received by Atty.
Atras but he did not do anything anymore. He also' failed to file his withdrawal,
and no appearance was made by the new counsel. When Mr. Abante found out
about the adverse decision, the period to appeal had lapsed. Was service to Atty.
Atras effective?
1. Yes, Atty. Atras is still considered the counsel of record until his
withdrawal of appearance has been actually filed and granted.
2. Service should be done on Mr. Abante because he had already severed
lawyer-client relationship with Atty. Atras.
3. Service should be done on the new counsel as soon as he enters his
appearance.
4. Service upon Atty. Atras is not effective because his services have already
been terminated by the client.
69. Atty. Utang borrowed from Y Php 300,000.00 secured by a post dated check.
When presented, the check was dishonored. Y filed a BP 22 case in court, and a
disbarment complaint with the IBP. In the latter case, Atty. Utang moved for
dismissal as the act has nothing to do with his being. a lawyer and that it is
premature because the case is pending and he is entitled to presumption of
innocence. Should the disbarment complaint be dismissed?
1. No, because lawyers may be disciplined for all acts, whether professional
or private.
2. Yes, there is no conviction yet.
3. Yes, BP 22 does not involve moral turpitude.
4. No, unless he pays the amount of the check to the satisfaction of Y.
70. Atty. Juan Cruz of the Cruz, Cruz and Cruz Law Office personally handled a
damage case of Mr. Gonzalo which resulted in an award of Php 500,000.00. The
writ of execution was served by Sheriff Onoy, but resulted in recovery of only Php
70,000.00. Mr. Gonzalo was unsatisfied and filed an administrative complaint.
When informed, Sheriff Onoy berated and threatened Mr. Gonzalo; and for this,
the Sheriff was charged with Grave Threat. Atty. Pedro Cruz of the same Cruz,
Ci·uz and Cruz Law Office appeared as defense counsel pro bono. Mr. Gonzalo
seeks his disqualification. Decide.
1. No conflict of interest. The Grave Threat case arose out of a different
factual scenario.
2. There is conflict of interest because both Atty. Juan Cruz and Atty. Pedro
Cruz belong to one law office.
3. No conflict of interest since the court case was wholly handled by Atty.
Juan Cruz. The law office did not participate in any way.
4. No conflict of interest. No likelihood that information in the civil case can
be used in the criminal case.
71. Atty. Lorna, a legal officer of a government agency, and Chona, a nurse in the
medical department, were best friends. At one time, Chona consulted Atty. Lorna
about a legal matter, revealing that she is living with a married man and that she
has a child out of wedlock fathered by another man. Later, the relation between
Atty. Lorna and Chona soured. When Chona applied for promotion, Atty. Lorna
filed immorality charges against Chona utilizing solely the disclosure by the latter
of her private life. Chona objected and invoked confidentiality of information from
attorney-client relationship. Decide.
1. There is no attorney-client relationship because, being in the government,
Atty. Lorna is disallowed from practicing her profession.
2. No lawyer-client relationship privilege because the information was given
as a friend, and not as a lawyer.
3. Personal secrets revealed to Atty. Lorna for the purpose of seeking legal.
advice is covered by attorney-client privilege.
4. There is no attorney-client relationship because no attorney's fee was paid
to Atty. Lorna.
72. Atty. Nelson recently passed the Bar and wanted to specialize in marine labor
law. He gave out calling cards with his name, address and telephone number in
front, and the following words at the back: "We provide legal assistance to
overseas seamen who are repatriated due to accident, illness, injury, or death.
We also offer FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE." Does this constitute ethical
misconduct?
1. No, clients have freedom in the selection of their counsel.
2. No, use of a professional card is a lawful way of announcing his services
as a professional.
3. Yes, because the offer of financial assistance is an undignified way of
luring clients.
4. Yes, because the offer of assistance is stated at the back.
73. Which of these does not constitute competent evidence of identity?
 1. Passport;
2. SSS card;
3. Community Tax Certificate;
4. Senior Citizen Card.
74. A recovery of ownership complaint was filed by the Dedo and Dedo Law Firm,
through Atty. Jose Dedo as counsel. During all the phases of trial, it was Atty.
Jose Dedo who appeared. Unfortunately, Atty. Jose Dedo died before completion
of trial. Notices and orders sent to the Dedo and Dedo Law Firm were returned to
the court with the manifestation that Atty. Dedo already died and requesting the
court to directly send the matters to the client. Is this proper?
1. No, the law firm- through another lawyer - should continue to appear for
the client.
2. Yes, because the death of the handling lawyer terminates the
attorney-client relationship.
3. Yes, because attorney's fees was not paid to the law firm.
4. No, it will be unjust for the client to pay another lawyer.
75. Which of these is not a ground for disbarment?
1. Conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude.
2. Belligerent disobedience to a lawful order of a trial court.
3. Malpractice or other gross misconduct in office.
4. Grossly immoral conduct.
76. (unread text)
77. Supreme Court are handled by:
1. Clerk of Court of the Supreme Court
2. Ombudsman
3. Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeals
4. Office of the Court Administrator
78. Atty. Aimee was convicted by final judgment of Estafa Thru Falsification of a
Commercial Document, a crime involving moral turpitude. What is the
appropriate penalty?
1. Disbarment ·
2. Indefinite suspension
3. Suspension for three (3) years
4. Admonition
79. During the IBP Chapter elections, the candidates for President were Atty. EJ, a
labor arbiter of the NLRC, Fiscal RJ of the DOJ and Atty. Gani of the PAO. After
canvass, Fiscal RJ garnered the highest number of votes, followed by Arbiter EJ
and by Atty. Gani. The winning Vice-President moved for the annulment of the
election for President because all the candidates for President are government
officials and are disqualified. Decide.
1. The election for presidency is invalid, and the elected Vice-President shall
assume the Presidency by succession.
2. The election is a failure, and new elections should be held.
3. Fiscal RJ and Arbiter EJ are disqualified. Atty. Gani should be declared
winner.
 4. All the candidates who are government officials are deemed resigned
upon their acceptance of nomination; and so, Fiscal RJ is winner.
80. Atty. Edad is an 85 year old lawyer. He does not practice law anymore. However,
his IBP Chapter continues to send him notices to pay his IBP dues of more than
ten (1 0) years with warning that failure to comply will result in the removal of his
name. Piqued by this, Atty. Edad filed with the IBP Secretary a sworn letter
notifying that he is voluntarily terminating his membership with the IBP. Should
he be allowed?
1. No, because membership in IBP is compulsory for all lawyers.
2. Yes, an erstwhile IBP member may terminate his membership for good
reasons.
3. No, that is only a ploy to evade payment of IBP dues.
4. Yes, it will violate his right not to join an association.
81. Who elects the members of the Board of Governors of the IBP?
1. The Presidents of all IBP Chapters;
2. The members at large of the IBP;
3. The House of Delegates;
4. The Past Presidents of all IBP chapters.
82. Who elects the President and Vice-President of the IBP?
1. The President of all IBP Chapters;
2. The IBP members voting at large;
3. The Board of Governors;
4. The outgoing IBP officers.
83. A judge or judicial officer is disqualified to hear a case before him wherein a party
is related to him by consanguinity or affinity -
1. up to the 6th degree;
2. up to the 5th degree;
3. up to the 4th degree;
4. up to the 3rd degree.
84. A judge or judicial .officer should inhibit himself from hearing a case before him
where the counsel for either party is a relative by consanguinity or affinity -
1. up to the 3rd degree;
2. up to the 4th degree;
3. up to the 5th degree;
4. up to the 6th degree.
85. Victor has been legally separated from his wife, Belen for fifteen (15) years. He
has found true love and happiness with Amor and they lived together as husband
and wife. Amor convinced Victor to study law and gave him financial support.
Recently, Victor passed the 2011 Bar Examinations. Upon knowing this, Belen
filed a complaint against Victor for immorality. Should Victor be allowed to take
oath as an attorney?
1. Yes, his relationship with Amor is imbued with genuine love and cannot be
considered immoral and indecent.
2. Yes, legal separation does not allow the spouses to remarry.
 3. No, because legal separation does not dissolve the marriage and,
therefore, Victor's relationship with Amor is still considered illicit.
4. Yes, it is totally unfair for Belen to complain since they have lived separate
lives.
86. Judge Nacy personally witnessed a vehicular accident near his house. Later, the
Reckless Imprudence case was raffled to his sala. Is there a valid ground for his
inhibition?
1. No. he is not acquainted nor related with any of the parties or lawyer.
2. No, his personal knowledge of what actually happened will even ensure
that he will decide the case justly on the basis of the true facts.
3. Yes, because a judge should decide a case on the basis of the evidence
presented before him and not on extraneous matters.
4. No, because there is no ground for disqualification and no motion for
inhibition.
87. Judge Ramon obtained a two (2) year car loan from a financing company. He
never paid a single amortization. After the lapse of two (2) years, the financing
company filed an administrative complaint against the judge for willful failure to
pay a just debt. Is the judge administratively liable?
1. No, since the loan is not connected with his judicial function.
2. Yes, because a judge should avoid impropriety or the appearance of
impropriety even in his private dealings.
3. No, the financing company should have availed of the remedy of
foreclosure.
4. No, because the administrative charge is only meant to force the judge to
pay.
88. Bong, son of Judge Rey, is a fourth year law student. He helped his friend
prepare an affidavit-complaint for Violation of Batas Pambansa Big. 22. After
drafting, they showed it to Judge Rey who made some corrections. Later, the BP
22 case was raffled to Judge Rey who tried and convicted the accused. Was
there impropriety?
1. Yes, since Judge Rey was not a fair and impartial judge.
2. No, the evidence for the prosecution was strong and sufficient to prove
guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
3. No, because any other judge would also have convicted the accused.
4. No, those matters were not known to the accused.
89. Atty. Fred is a law practitioner and headed a law firm bearing his name and those
of his partners. When Atty. Fred was elected as Congressman, his client's needs
were handled by the other partners. Later, A, a newly proclaimed
congressman-friend , faced an election protest before the HRET, and sought the
help of Congressman Fred who immediately directed his law firm to appear for A.
8, the protestant, sought the disqualification of Congressman Fred's law firm from
appearing before the HRET because Congressman Fred is prohibited from
practicing his profession. Decide.
 1. Yes, Congressman Fred's law firm is disqualified because Congressman
Fred may exercise undue influence on his peers who are members of
HRET.
2. No, the law firm is not disqualified because it is another partner, and not
Congressman Fred who is appearing.
3. No, the prohibition is on Congressman Fred from personally appearing,
and not to his partners.
4. Yes, the spirit of the prohibition is clearly to avoid influence and cannot be
indirectly circumvented.
90. Vice-Mayor Ron is a well-loved law practitioner because he assists his
constituents, especially the indigents. Ed, one of his friends who is employed as
Cashier in the Register of Deeds, sought his assistance because he was charged
with Malversation in court. Can Vice-Mayor Ron appear as counsel of Ed?
1. Yes, members of the Sanggunian are allowed to practice their profession.
2. No, because Ed is charged with an offense in relation to his office.
3. Yes, since the position of Ed does not pertain to the local government.
4. No, because all criminal cases are against the government.
91. Atty. Noe was elected Vice-Governor and continued with his law practice. Later,
the governor went on sick leave for one (1) year and Atty. Noe was designated
as Acting Governor. Since hearings have already been set, can Atty. Noe
continue appearing as counsel in the cases handled by him?
1. Yes, because his election is only as Vice-Governor, and his delegation as
Governor is only temporary.
2. Yes, but only for the hearings that have already been set.
3. Yes, provided Atty. Noe seeks the permission of DILG.
4. No, all governors- even under acting capacity- are prohibited from
exercising their profession.
92. Atty. Dude is the COMELEC Officer in a very distant municipality. He is. the only
lawyer in that area. When election period is over, he has much spare time. Many
people go to him for counseling, legal advice, preparation of documents of Sale,
Mortgage and the like. He does not charge a fee in money, but he receives gifts
which are offered. Is there impropriety?
1. Yes, giving legal advice and preparing legal documents, even if free,
constitutes private practice of law, which is prohibited of government
employees.
2. No, it is only giving of advices, and not court appearance.
3. Yes, because Atty. Dude accepts gifts.
4. No, since Atty. Dude does not accept money.
93. A notary public is required to record chronologically the notarial acts that he
performs in the:
1. Notarial Book;
2. Roll of Documents Notarized;
3. Notarial Register;
4. Notarial Loose Leafs Sheets.
94. A party to a contract does not know how to write. Neither can he affix his
thumbmark because both hands were amputated. How will that person execute
the contract?
1. Ask the party to affix a mark using the toe of his foot in the presence of the
notary public and two (2) disinterested and unaffected witnesses to the
instrument.
2. Ask the party to hold the pen with his teeth and affix a + mark to be
followed by the signature of one friend.
3. The party may ask the notary public to sign in his behalf.
4. None of the above.
95. The reports of a Notary Public are submitted to the:
1. Executive Judge;
2. Court Administrator;
3. Notarial Archives;
4. Clerk of Court.
96. Atty. Tony is a 25 year old Filipino lawyer. He has been a resident in Paranaque
City for about ten (1 0) years and holds office in his residence. He filed a petition
for appointment as Notary Public in Paranaque and has clearance from the I BP
and the Bar Confidant. However, it appears that while still a college student, he
was convicted by a Laguna Court for Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Damage
to Property. During the summary hearing of his petition, the offended party
therein strongly objected on that ground. Can Atty. Tony be appointed?
1. No, because he has a previous criminal record.
2. No, because of the opposition.
3. Yes, the offense of Reckless Imprudence does not involve moral turpitude.
4. Yes, since the Reckless Imprudence case did not happen in the
jurisdiction where Atty. Tony is applying.
97. What is the effect when the parties to a document acknowledged before a notary
public did not present competent evidence of identity?
1. Voidable;
2. Valid;
3. Invalid Notarization;
4. Unenforceable.
98. The petition for appointment as a notary public should be filed with:
1. The Office of the Court Administrator;
2. The Clerk of Court;
3. The MeTC Executive Judge;
4. The RTC Executive Judge.
99. What is a retaining lien?
1. The lawyer who handled the case during the trial stage should continue to
be retained up to the appeal.
2. The right of the lawyer to be retained as counsel for a party until the entire
case is finished.
 3. The right of a lawyer who is discharged or withdrawn to keep the records
and property of the client in his possession until his lawful services have
been paid.
4. The prerogative of a client's retainer to recover out-of-pocket expenses.
100. For grave misconduct, a lawyer was suspended from the practice of law
indefinitely. Is he still obliged to pay his IBP dues during his suspension?
1. Yes, as he continues to be a lawyer and a member of the IBP.
2. No, because indefinite suspension is practically disbarment.
3. No need to pay IBP dues because he cannot practice anyway.
4. Pay only after the lifting of the suspension, if it comes.
101. Because of his political beliefs, Atty. Guerra joined a rebel group. Later, he
was apprehended and charged with Rebellion in court. A disbarment case was
also filed against him. While the case was pending, the government approved a
general amnesty program and Atty. Guerra applied for and was granted amnesty.
Should the disbarment case be also dismissed automatically?
1. Yes, because amnesty obliterates the criminal act.
2. No, disciplinary action on lawyers are sui generis and general penal
principles do not strictly apply.
3. No, a lawyer has the duty to maintain allegiance to the Republic of the
Philippines and to support the Constitution and obey the laws of the
Philippines.
4. Yes, if the Secretary of Justice approves the dismissal.
102. Soon after Atty. Cesar passed the Philippine Bar in 1975, he also took the
New York State Bar and passed the same. He practiced law for 25 years in the
USA, but he was disbarred therein for insurance fraud. He returned to the
Philippines and started to practice law. X, who knew about his New York
disbarment, filed a disbarment complaint with the IBP. Decide.
1. The factual basis for the New York disbarment which is deceitalso
constitutes a ground for disbarment in the Philippines.
2. The acts complained of happened in a foreign country and cannot be
penalized here.
3. Norms of ethical behavior of lawyers are the same worldwide.
4. A lawyer's fitness to become a lawyer must be maintained wherever he
may be.

family. The judge’s act of doing so renders him guilty of conduct unbecoming of a

judge.
17. ​Atty. De Leon persuaded Arthur, Liza and Ethel to invest in a business venture that

later went bankrupt. Arthur, Liza and Ethel charged Atty. De Leon with estafa.

Simultaneously, they filed an administrative complaint against Atty. De Leon with

the Supreme Court. If Atty. De Leon is convicted of estafa, will he be disbarred? If

Atty. De Leon is acquitted of the estafa charge, will the disbarment complaint be

dismissed?

A: Moral turpitude includes everything which is done contrary to justice, honesty, or

good morals. In essence and in all respects, estafa, no doubt, is a crime involving

moral turpitude because the act is unquestionably against justice, honesty and good

morals. If Atty. De Leon is convicted of estafa, then his guilt cannot now be

questioned and his disbarment is inevitable. On the other hand, if he is acquitted, the

disbarment case will not be automatically dismissed since the quantum of proof

required for a criminal case may not have been sufficient for his conviction but may

suffice for his disbarment

18. ​The Supreme Court suspended indefinitely Atty. Cruz from the practice of law for

gross immorality. He asked the Municipal Circuit Trial Court Judge of his town if he

can be appointed counsel de oficio for Martin, a childhood friend who is accused of
theft. The judge refused because Atty. Cruz's name appears in the Supreme Court's

List of Suspended Lawyers. Atty. Cruz then inquired if he can appear as a friend for

Martin to defend him. If you were the judge, will you authorize him to appear in your

court as a friend for Martin?

A: Suspension is the removal of a lawyer from the practice of law for a specified

minimum period of time. Generally, suspension should be for a period of time equal

to or greater than six months, but in no event should the time period prior to

application for reinstatement be more than three years. Procedures should be

established to allow a suspended lawyer to apply for reinstatement, but a lawyer who

has been suspended should not be permitted to return to practice until he has

completed a reinstatement process demonstrating rehabilitation, compliance with all

applicable discipline or disability orders and rules, and fitness to practice law.

Allowing him to act as an agent or friend of a litigant before the MCTC is akin to

doing indirectly what he cannot do directly.

19. ​Sheila consulted Atty. Fernandez whether she can successfully prosecute her case
for

declaration of nullity of marriage she intends to file against her husband. Atty.
Fernandez advised her in writing that the case will not prosper for the reasons stated

therein. Sheila, however, decided to file the case and engaged the services of another

lawyer, Atty. Lim. Her husband, Noel, having learned about the opinion of Atty.

Fernandez, hired him as his lawyer. Is Atty. Fernandez’s acquiescence to be Noel's

counsel ethical?

A: Yes. There is conflict of interest since the confidential information Atty.

Fernandez acquired during his previous employment with Sheila can be used against

the latter. A lawyer-client relationship was established from the very first moment

complainant asked respondent for legal advise regarding the former’s business. To

constitute professional employment, it is not essential that the client employed the

attorney professionally on any previous occasion.

It is not necessary that any retainer be paid, promised, or charged; neither is it

material that the attorney consulted did not afterward handle the case for which his

service had been sought. If a person, in respect to business affairs or troubles of any

kind, consults a lawyer with a view to obtaining professional advice or assistance, and

the attorney voluntarily permits or acquiesces with the consultation, then the

professional employments is established.

he was convicted of estafa and was disbarred. Does his disbarment in New York a

ground for his automatic disbarment in the Philippines?

A: No. Disbarment in the NY bar is not a ground for disbarment in the Philippines. At

most, it can serve as prima facie evidence for the disbarment case in the Philippines.