Report III
Report III
Report III
Report III
Hayley Bragdon
Mathematics
Gordon Fairmount
County Elementary School 62 507 27.4 38.7 30.6 3.2
Bragdon 3
Yes No
No Is performance punishing?
No
Is non-performance rewarding?
If not, then use the following
No
NN
Is it motivational?
Training: Before learning how to add and subtract fractions, students
need to learn and memorize basic multiplication facts. I would work in No
a small group where I explicitly teach fluency facts.
S
Feedback: Teacher will be working in a small group p with five students. This
Is it environmental? Possibly. Most of the students I work with come from
allows for frequent feedback. When each student has completed a problem, the
teacher will review it before allowing the student to go to the next one.
low-income families, who have parents that struggled in school too.
Job Aids: The teacher will provide the students with a multiplication
fact tower sheet, as well as a laminated chart that has each step of the
process printed on it.
3.1 Optimals
3.1.1 What information and data would you collect?
During planning, I would review their fractions exam. I would review student work and leave
post-it notes on the errors they made. Then, I would go over the exam with my students.
3.1.2 How would you collect that information and data?
I would grade each exam and keep a data sheet on the most missed questions. I would then let
students correct their errors and turn it back in for partial credit.
3.2 Actuals
3.2.1 What information and data would you collect?
I would want to collect data on where each of my students show a weakness in the process of
adding and subtracting fractions with unlike denominators. Some areas I would be examining
would be: multiplication fact fluency, addition and subtraction fact fluency, academic
vocabulary, and finding the least common multiple.
3.2.2 How would you collect that information and data?
I would give my students a pre-assessment with each area that I listed above. While reviewing
them, I would keep a data sheet of what each student needs to improve on to decide where I
would begin with my small group instruction, for my students to meet their goal of adding and
subtracting fractions.
3.3 What are the discrepancies between the current and desired state?
The biggest discrepancy is the lack of instructional time in the current state. The curriculum map
does not allow much time for students who are struggling to catch up when they fall behind.
Most of the time, once they are almost caught up, a new concept is already being taught.
Bragdon 5
3.5
LEARNING GOAL
Fifth grade students will recognize all the steps to correctly add and subtract fractions with
unlike denominators.
MEASUREMENT
Class Evaluation………….. X
Learning Outcomes
Performance Test…………X _
Performance Condition Criterion
(tasks to perform goal)
(learning
On-the-Job Follow-Up……. __
(restrictions, tools)
environment) ROI Effect………………… ____
Intellectual Cognitive Verbal Motor Attitude
Skills Strategies Information Skills
Small
group in
Finding the least
the
common multiple X
classroom X
4.1.1 The domain classification for the learning goal is cognitive skills. Adding and subtracting
fractions with unlike denominators for students to be able to meet this goal, they will need to
have working memory skills, as well as reasoning skills.
4.2.1 Below is a hierarchal analysis
Add and subtract fractions
with unlike denominators
Multiply your
numerators by the
Write down the multiples Circle the least common multiple
same number you
of each denominator between the two numbers
multiplied the
denominator
Write down
expression
6. Assessments
6.1. To assess if my students were understanding the content and meeting the learning objective,
I would give my students a numbered list. For each number they would list the step to
completing adding or subtracting fractions with unlike denominators. Once I viewed the
assessments on this, I would determine whether they had met the learning objective.
6.2. Assessment instruments that would be used for this exam would be a numbered list, a word
bank and a pencil.
6.3.1. To assess if my students were able to identify the numerator and denominator in a fraction,
I would let them verbally state their answer. During small group time, I would call each student
to my table and show them a fraction. I would either point to the numerator or the denominator
and have each student identify it.
6.3.2. To assess if my students were able to solve basic multiplication problem 1-9, I would pull
their data from a mathematics program called, Reflux. Students work on this program during
small group time for twenty minutes per day. One feature on this application is that its provides
data of each specific facts that the student knows.
6.3.3. To assess if my students were able to find the least common multiple, I would have my
students write down the least common multiple for a series of numbers. Tower sheets would be
provided for struggling learners.
7. Instructional Strategy
Bragdon 8
7.1. An appropriate pre-instructional activity for the terminal objective would be to display an
addition problem with fractions with unlike denominators with the answer provided. Students
would then raise their hand and explain either what they noticed or wondered about the problem.
This would be a way to get the students thinking, as well as catching their attention.
7.2. To add or subtraction fractions with unlike denominators, students must know basic
multiplication facts. For struggling students, an appropriate strategy would be for them to fill out
tower sheets for basic multiplication facts 0-9. This could be used as “cheat sheet,” while they
are adding and subtracting fractions.
7.3. An appropriate practice activity for struggling students would be playing around the world
with their classmates using multiplication flash cards.
7.4. An appropriate evaluation follow-up activity would be giving the struggling students a
fluency drill. This would be an effective way to collect data to examine which specific facts the
students are struggling with.
10.4. Appropriate follow-through materials would be white boards, dry-erase markers, and
fraction tiles. These materials would be needed once a week during station day. On station day,
students work in stations. During this time, I could have a fraction station. In this station,
students would work in pairs and write addition or subtraction fraction problems for their
partners to solve with the fraction tiles.
11. Formative Evaluation
For a formative evaluation, I would have students to complete a Kahoot! Quiz on the iPad. The
Kahoot! App is a helpful way to collect data quickly and efficiently. The quiz would have
vocabulary questions, addition and subtraction problems, as well as question for students to
answer how they felt about the mastery of this unit. Using Kahoot! shows me what type of
content which students are not mastering, as well as showing me which questions the majority of
the students did not answer correctly.
12. Revision
After collecting data from the Kahoot! quiz, I would design small groups for struggling learners.
The small groups would be no more than five students in a group. There would be multiple
groups all working on different skills in the steps of adding and subtraction fractions. Struggling
students would stay in these small groups until they mastered their goals for the small group.
13. Summative Evaluation
To save instructional time, in the formative evaluation, on the Kahoot! quiz, I would ask students
how confident they felt about mastering the terminal objective. On the quiz, they could make
green, yellow, or red. I would also provide a comment box for the students, who mark red, to
explain what step they are struggling with or what they feel is keeping them from mastering the
objective.