The Accessible Road Blocks in Implementing Total Quality Management (TQM) in Indian Telecom Industry Limited
The Accessible Road Blocks in Implementing Total Quality Management (TQM) in Indian Telecom Industry Limited
ABSTRACT
Within the umbrella of the contemporary viable market economy, Indian telecom industry limited
is relentlessly besieged to accomplish a sustained competitive advantage that will enable them to
improve performance, which will result in progressive competitiveness and revenue .In the
middle of the few competitive advantages in order to sustain in the competition, Quality Theaters
a fundamental role. Recent research shows that about 95.2% of buyers in the national and
international market mull over quality as having the least importance with the decisive revenue
in making the decision to purchase a product. In the outlook of experts and professional of
economic theory and practice, total quality refers to the holistic loom of quality, which
essentially means; covering the entire spectrum of economic, social and technical development
of quality. Consequently the holistic approach of quality at Indian telecom industry limited
involves procedural approach of quality management system. The focal point of this study is on
the procedure and the type of quality management system by considering the strategic features of
the continuous improvement of quality through quality management ISO 9001:2015. Total
Quality Management (TQM) is to road way to transform the economies of the countries to be
more competitive amongst others. Conversely, Total Quality Management does not produce
yields at once; also it is not a panacea for all the problems that the Indian telecom industry
Keywords: Quality; total quality; Total Quality Management (TQM) implementation, Road
Blocks.
Introduction
This literature distinguishes between quality management and Total Quality management. The
modern practices for Quality assurance of goods and services encompass the continuous
development aligned with the socio-cultural and technological transformations that have
manifested the brisk progression of society. Ever since 1980s, integrated quality assurance
concepts are implemented whose initial starting point was "new philosophy" of Mr. Feigenbaum,
i.e., Total Quality Control which awakened scrupulous concern mutually in literature and in
economic practices, the perception of Total Quality Management (TQM) was used in analogous
or in harmonizing affiliation with the theory of Total Quality (TQ) (Olaru, 1999).
Mr.Feigenbaum demonstrated that acquiring quality performance was depended on the growing
effect of competitiveness instantaneous or in reduced time (Whalen, 1994).
Key facet of Total Quality Management (TQM) implementation in Indian telecom industry
limited. The modern challenge that prevails in defining the concept of Total Quality
Management (TQM) was said by Mosadeghrad (2014) who affirmed that Total Quality
Management (TQM) aspires to augment customer satisfaction and organizational performance
through delivering high quality products and services with the aid of participation and
collaboration of all stakeholders, teamwork, a customer orientation, continuous improvement and
process performance with the help of appropriate quality management techniques and tools.
The review of literature declared that implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM) is a
complex phenomenon which is difficult, lengthy, cross linking the huge functional efforts from
organizations like Indian telecom industry limited. While it has been suggested, in principle that
in order to improve the overall performance of practical application of Total Quality
There are several steps to surface the implementation of quality management system ISO
9001:2015. In this paper discusses few such looms. An approach is steps that are taken by the
organization in order to implement any system; the following steps are being proposed which
falls under the scope of this study. (Stegerean, 2009:281):
Implementation: During this phase/fragment, both staff and managers of the organization are
trained. Their training involves informing each employee/staff of the organization about the
meaning and implication of Total Quality Management (TQM) which is to be explained based
the society as its role in the organization and what is expected out of him.
Diversification: At this phase /fragment, managers will use their seasons to integrate the groups
outside the organization like suppliers, distributors, and other companies who has momentous
impact on their business in the quality.
Inspection - In this phase, the organization is concerned with its own process activities
such as examination, measurement, test and evaluation. This ensures that the product or
service conforms to specified requirements.
Quality Control (QC) - Methods and Systems are deployed as ingredient of the self-
inspection.
Quality Assurance (QA) – This focuses on continuous improvement through a
systematic planning and preventing errors occurring from the source.
Appreciating the dynamics that are likely to impede the implementation of the Total Quality
Management (TQM) in Indian telecom industry limited permits the managers to develop more
efficient strategies for improving the likelihood of booming deployment of Total Quality
Management (TQM) in Indian telecom industry limited; Thereby accomplishing superiority in
their business (Jacobsen, 2008).
In the review of literature there are a massive amount of studies that concentrates on various
diverse customs for classification of the dynamics that encumber the thriving implementation of
Total Quality Management (TQM) in Indian telecom industry limited. This paper will accentuate
some of the approaches which are portrayed as obstacles and the established causes which
prevent Indian telecom industry limited from application of the quality management system.
Whalen (1994) acknowledged the following nine obstacles that encumber the development and
implementation of the programme of Total Quality Management (TQM):
1. Poor planning
2. Deficiency of commitment by top management
3. The potency of the labor force
4. Deficiency of appropriate training
5. Complacency of the team members
6. Application of an invalid program (invalid shelf life/moral)
7. The inability to bring about change in organizational philosophy(culture)
8. Insufficient resources
9. The lack of improvement in the measurement of quality.
Additional instigators’ like Sebastianelli and Tamimi (2003), have recognized five obstacles in
the implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM):
Johnson (2013) disagrees with the main obstacle which he found that is mainly due to deficiency
of benchmarking and confrontation of employees’ to transform. Organizations must comprehend
that benchmarking is one of the tool that is used for classification of strengths and weaknesses in
association with the preeminent companies in their market. Employees’ resistance can be
trounced by appropriate training which involves planning scheduling and implementation phases
of Total Quality Management (TQM). It was also found that scarce resources are also an obstacle
to the implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM).
An additional author, Mosadeghrad (2014) addresses the obstacles to deployment Total Quality
Management (TQM) in a more intricate way, in the sense that research was carried out in 23
countries, out of which 28 studies were conducted in developed countries, and 26 studies were
conducted in developing countries. The outcomes of these studies are as follows:
It clearly states that the research was conducted ever since 1990’s (Mosadeghrad, 2014) have
revealed incredibly elevated rates of failure in the implementation of the Total Quality
Management (TQM), authors like Schonberger, (1992); Eskildson, (1994); Elmuti et al., (1996);
Tata and Prasad, (1998) has testified increase of about 20-30% by organizations on performance
improvement after implementation of the Total Quality Management (TQM), while Burrows in
1992 reported a failure [Total Quality Management (TQM)] rate of 95% (Sebastianelli, 2003).
Although the Total Quality Management (TQM) was positioned first among all the techniques
for quality improvement in 1993 and the same was reduced to 15% in 2007, according to Rigby
and Bilodeau (Mosadeghrad, 1986).
These statistics have made Mosadeghrad (2014) to conjecture whether the Total Quality
Management (TQM) has just begotten a "fad" of management. It is imperative primarily out of
all to comprehend the rationale for the failure of the Total Quality Management (TQM). In this
The erroneous milieu for the implementation of the Total Quality Management
(TQM): The implementation of the values and the principles of total quality management
necessitate a supportive environment like supporting leadership, culture and
infrastructure in order to implement the Total Quality Management (TQM).
Strategic level obstacle: Strategic concerns are momentous obstacle for the
implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM) and have the maximum pessimistic
impact on its success. These obstacles are principally correlated to the management and
leadership of the organization.
Structural level obstacle: These are related to the structure, systems and physical
resources necessary to implement the Total Quality Management (TQM).
Human resources level obstacle: These are those obstacles which are related to human
factors such as deficiency of employee involvement and commitment and their
confrontation to transform in Total Quality Management (TQM).
Contextual level obstacle: These are those obstacles that crop up when the context has
developed and achieve the highest potential of appropriate culture by deploying of the
Total Quality Management (TQM).
Procedural level obstacle: This is primarily spawned due to intense complexity of the
processes involved, the lack of focus on the client, the lack of partnership with suppliers,
the bureaucracy and the lack of a system evaluation and self-assessment.
Strategic-level Obstacle
Among the five diversified obstacles that are mentioned above it has been seen that in Indian
telecom industry limited the strategic obstacles are the most common type of obstacle that
encumber the thriving implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM) system. Also, the
human resources obstacles have a huge impact on the accomplishment of Total Quality
Management (TQM) implementation.
It is herby confirmed that among the strategic-level obstacles and human resources obstacles,
which are faced by Indian telecom industry limited leadership is a key factor in managing the
transformation that are necessary to implement the Total Quality Management (TQM) which is
trailed by employees’ involvement and commitment.
Conclusion
Total Quality Management (TQM) is perceived as an approach that can transform the economy
of Indian telecom industry limited to be more competitive among their competitors. However
Total Quality Management (TQM) will not only fetch and generate outcome overnight, it is not a
panacea for all the problems that the Indian telecom industry limited is facing. Total Quality
Management (TQM) necessitates a transformation in Indian telecom industry limited in
organizational culture, which aims at meeting customer expectations and increasing the
involvement of all employees’ to meet the Indian telecom industry limited objective, as an
expression of the ethics of continuous improvement.
Main rationale for the failure of Total Quality Management (TQM) in Indian telecom industry
limited are ineffective or inappropriate model of Total Quality Management (TQM), ineffective
or inappropriate methods of implementation for the Total Quality Management (TQM),
Erroneous milieu for Total Quality Management (TQM) implementation.
Implementation obstacles can be divided into the following categories: strategic level obstacles,
human resources level obstacles, structural level obstacles, contextual level obstacles, and
procedural level obstacles.
References.
1. Abdullah, A., (2010) Measuring Total Quality Management (TQM) Implementation: A Case
Study, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 4-17.
2. Eskildson, L. (1994), improving the odds of Total Quality Management (TQM)’s success,
Quality Progress, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 60-64.
3. Ilieş, L., Crişan, E., (2011), Managementul Calităţii Totale, Editura Risoprint, Cluj-Napoca.
4. Jacobsen, J. (2008), Avoiding mistakes of the past: lessons learned on what makes or breaks
quality initiatives, The Journal for Quality and Participation, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 3-10.
5. Johnson, S., Kleiner, B., (2013) Total Quality Management (TQM) can encompass success
Industrial Management, Volume: 55, Issue: 2, Pages: 25-35.