Scribd
Upload
751 views2 pages

Integrated Performance Task Rubric

The rubric evaluates student presentations on how their chosen career contributes to environmental sustainability. It provides scoring criteria in the areas of creativity, knowledge of the chosen profession, and explaining the relevance/effectiveness of the career to environmental sustainability. The highest score is given for outstanding design, full knowledge demonstrated through elaborated answers, and superior explanation of the career's relevance. A middle score is given for adequate design, capable demonstration of knowledge and explanation. The lowest score is given for poor design, lack of knowledge, and vague explanation.

Uploaded by

Gail Althea
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
751 views2 pages

Integrated Performance Task Rubric

The rubric evaluates student presentations on how their chosen career contributes to environmental sustainability. It provides scoring criteria in the areas of creativity, knowledge of the chosen profession, and explaining the relevance/effectiveness of the career to environmental sustainability. The highest score is given for outstanding design, full knowledge demonstrated through elaborated answers, and superior explanation of the career's relevance. A middle score is given for adequate design, capable demonstration of knowledge and explanation. The lowest score is given for poor design, lack of knowledge, and vague explanation.

Uploaded by

Gail Althea
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Personal Development

Performance Task Rubric

QUESTION: How can your chosen career contribute to Environmental Sustainability?

5 4 3 2

Display Board: Display Board: Display Board: Display Board:


 Outstanding use of  Adequate use of  Inappropriate use of  Little attempt to use
color, design, and color, design, and color, design, and color, design and
space space space space appropriately
 Original and creative  Design is adequate  Design lacks creativity  Design is dull
Creativity design Overall design is mostly Lack of harmonious Project has sloppy
(Display Board/ Outfit or Overall design is pleasing and design in presentation appearance
Costume) pleasing and harmonious Outfit/ Costume:
harmonious Outfit/ Costume:  student took on Outfit/ Costume:
Outfit/ Costume:  student took on the appearance  student took on
 student took on the appearance and personality the appearance
the appearance and personality of their character and personality
and personality of their character in an acceptable of their character
of their character in a capable manner in a vague
in a superior manner manner
manner

 Student is at ease  Student is  Student does not


 Student with expected uncomfortable have grasp of
Knowledge on Chosen demonstrates full answers to all with information information on
Profession knowledge on questions, but and is able to the chosen
Chosen fails to elaborate answer only career; student
Profession (more cannot answer
than required) by rudimentary questions about
answering all questions subject
questions with
explanations and
elaboration

 Student explains  Student explains  Student explains


Relevance/ Effectiveness  Students explains the relevance/ the relevance/ the relevance/
of Chosen Career to the relevance/ effectiveness of effectiveness of effectiveness of
Environmental effectiveness of chosen career to chosen career to chosen career to
Sustainability chosen career to environmental environmental environmental
environmental sustainability in a sustainability in sustainability in a
sustainability in a capable manner. an acceptable vague manner.
superior manner. manner.

You might also like