International Journal of Technology (2018) 3: 434-445

ISSN 2086-9614 © IJTech 2018

ADSORPTION OF NICKEL(II) IONS FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION USING

BANANA PEEL AND COCONUT SHELL

Babatope Olufemi1*, Omolola Eniodunmo1

1
Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, University of Lagos, Akoka, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria

(Received: September 2016 / Revised: March 2017 / Accepted: March 2017)

ABSTRACT
This work investigates the comparative adsorptive removal of Ni (II) ions from aqueous
solution using coconut shell and banana peel. Optimum conditions for adsorption were
determined by experimental design, while Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni-
Holm Posthoc significance statistical tests on operational parameters were also conducted. The
parametric effect of adsorbate dose, adsorbent dose, pH, contact time, particle size and
temperature were varied individually, and their effect on the percentage of Ni (II) ion removal
was estimated. The maximum percentage removal was achieved at a pH of 8.0 by both
adsorbents. The optimum conditions obtained for both adsorbents were 4.5 g adsorbent dose,
30 min contact time and 25 oC for coconut shell, and 4.5 g adsorbent dose, 120 mins and 25 oC
for banana peel. The Langmuir isotherm best described the adsorption, with correlation
coefficient (R2) values of 0.9821 and 0.9744 for banana peel and coconut shell respectively.
The mean free energy from the Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm suggested chemisorption, and
the adsorption mechanism was found to fit the second order.

Keywords: Adsorption; ANOVA; Banana peel; Coconut shell; Nickel (II) ions

1. INTRODUCTION
Coconut shell and banana peel are low cost adsorbents usually regarded as agricultural waste.
Various studies have analyzed their adsorbing characteristics using different adsorbates and
conditions. In various capacities, adsorption depends on the characteristics of the individual
adsorbent, the extent of surface modification, and the initial concentration of the adsorbate,
temperature, pH, adsorbent dosage and size, among other variables. Annadurai et al. (2002)
worked on the adsorption of heavy metals from water using banana and orange peel. At 30 oC,
adsorption capacity decreased in the order Pb2+> Ni2+ >Zn2 +>Cu2+ >Co2+ for both adsorbents,
and rose with increasing pH. Song et al. (2013) described the removal of Pb2+ ions from
aqueous solution using coconut shell, activated with KOH. The Freundlich isotherm described
the adsorption data, while kinetics indicated a pseudo-second order kinetic model. In addition,
Olayinka et al. (2009) investigated the removal of Cr (VI) and Ni (II) from industrial waste
effluents using adsorption. The adsorption mechanism was found to fit the pseudo second order
after evaluation with pseudo first order and second order kinetics. Abbasi et al. (2013) carried
out a study on the adsorptive removal of Co2+ and Ni2+ by banana peel from aqueous solution.
The maximum amounts of Co2+ and Ni2+ adsorbed (qm), from the Langmuir isotherm were 9.02
and 8.91 mg per gram of banana peel, respectively.
Abbas et al., (2013) also studied the potentiality of banana peel to remove cyanide ion pollutant

*Corresponding author’s email: [email protected], Tel: +2348023162183

Permalink/DOI: https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i3.1936
Olufemi & Eniodunmo 435

from waste water using an adsorption process by simulating a synthetic aquatic solution;
maximum removal efficiency was 95.65% for cyanide ion removal. Okafor et al. (2012)
explored the adsorption capacity of coconut shell for the removal of Pb2+, Cu2+, Cd2+ and As3+
from aqueous solutions. Adsorption capacity followed the trend Pb2+> Cu2+> Cd2+> As3+ and
the kinetic treatment gave a pseudo second order type, while the Freundlich adsorption isotherm
best described the adsorption. Soco and Kalembkiewicz (2013) worked on the adsorption of
Ni2+ and Cu2+ ions from aqueous solution using coal fly ash. Optimum conditions of adsorption
of Cu and Ni ions in the systems were established and the coefficient of adsorption was
obtained using the Freundlich and Langmuir equations. Divakaran et al. (2012) also studied the
adsorption of Ni (II) ions and Cr (VI) ions by chitin and chitosan when both ions were present
together. The adsorption of Cr (VI) ions was much lower than that of Ni (II) ions.
Garba et al. (2016) reported on the ideal conditions for the adsorption of Ni (II) and Cd (II) ions
onto Modified Plantain Peel (MPP) from aqueous solution. The Langmuir model and pseudo
second order kinetics best described the two adsorption processes. The factors, effects and
mechanisms of the adsorption of Hg (II), Cd (II) and Ni (II) on charged liposomes was reported
by Gong et al. (2018). Attention was paid to the effect of pH, ionic strength and particle size of
the liposomes on sorption. The mutual effects between graphene oxide and Ni (II) ions with
regard to their adsorption and co-adsorption on two minerals (goethite and hematite) in aqueous
phase have been reported (Sheng et al., 2018). A pseudo second order kinetic model with
chemisorption was reported by Rao and Khan (2017) in the adsorption of Ni (II) on alkali-
treated pineapple residue in batch and column studies. The influence of metal ion concentration
and pH was investigated by Pino et al. (2006) in the biosorption of cadmium by green coconut
shell powder. In another useful account of agricultural waste, banana peel particles have been
effectively used as a replacement for asbestos in brake pad manufacture (Idris et al., 2015).
This present work is focused on the separate removal of nickel (II) ions from an aqueous
solution using coconut shell and banana peel, to study the comparative effect of various
parameters such as pH, contact time, adsorbent dose, adsorbate dose, particle size and
temperature. Further investigations of this present work include fitting the adsorption process
with suitable isotherms such as those of Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin-
Radushkevich, and to establish the kinetics of the adsorption process, as well as to optimize the
adsorption process and statistically correlate and justify the importance of the process
parameters.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Materials
Banana peel (Musa Acuminata) was collected from the local market in Bariga, Lagos, while
coconut shell (Cocos nucifera L.) was obtained from Badagry, Lagos, Nigeria.
2.1.1. Adsorbent preparation
The banana peel was prepared by adopting the method of Abbasi et al., (2013) and Taimur et
al. (2012). It was washed thoroughly with distilled water to remove dust and soil, dried in
sunlight for 5 days and kept in an oven at 70 oC. The dried peel was then cut into small pieces,
after which it was ground. The coconut shell was prepared based on the method used by Ayub
and Khorasgani (2014) and Tharannum et al. (2015). After collection it was sun dried for 2
days, crushed with a hammer mill, sieved and pre-treated with 0.1 M NaOH for 3 hours, then
washed with distilled water to remove dust, soil and NaOH traces. The adsorbent was sieved
and dried again at 50 oC in an oven. It was then stored in desiccators for use.
436 Adsorption of Nickel(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution using Banana Peel and Coconut Shell

2.1.2. The adsorbate

Nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate was used as the adsorbate and was obtained from Finlab, Ikorodu
Road, Lagos. It was prepared according to the method adopted by Gonen and Serin (2012).
Ni(II) ions were prepared by diluting 1000 mg/L of Ni(NO3)2.6H2O stock solution with distilled
water to a desired concentration range of between 10 and 200 mg/L.
2.1.3. Apparatus and reagents used
The following apparatus and reagents were used: analytical grade nitric acid (HNO3); analytical
grade sodium hydroxide (NaOH); analytical grade nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate salt [Ni
(NO3)2.6H2O]; a mesh sieve B.S.S (200); Buck atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS);
hammer mill; electric water bath; electric oven; electric water bath; graduated beakers and
cylinders; Whatman filter paper; electronic weighing balance; electronic pH meter; furnace;
funnels; stopwatch and distilled water.
2.2. Experimental Procedure
The initial pH of the solutions was adjusted by 0.1 M NaOH or 0.1 M HNO 3. All the
experiments were carried out at room temperature, and the initial and final metal ion
concentrations were determined using the AAS. All runs were conducted three times, with
averages taken. The % removal of the Ni(II) ion and the amount of (qe) adsorbed on the coconut
shell and banana peel were calculated using Equations 1 and 2, respectively:

Removal (%) = (1)

qe = (2)

where Ce is the equilibrium concentration of the mixture in mg/L; C0 is the initial concentration
of the mixture in mg/L; m is the mass of the adsorbent in grams; qe is the amount of solute
removed or adsorbed at equilibrium in mg/g; Vo is the initial volume of simulated oil spill in L;
and Ve is the final volume of simulated oil spill at equilibrium in L.
2.2.1. Effect of temperature on adsorption
Exactly 50 ml of 100 mg/L of the Ni solution was prepared from the stock solution using
distilled water. About 50 ml of the prepared adsorbate was placed into separate 250 ml beakers
and 2.5 g of each adsorbent (banana peel and coconut shell) was added to the beakers. The
beakers were placed in a water bath shaker for 20 minutes at 120 rpm. This step was then
repeated with temperature ranges from 20 to 60oC. The adsorbents were filtered out with filter
paper and funnels, while the filtrate concentrations were determined by the AAS. Average
ambient temperature was at 27oC.
2.2.2. Effect of pH
Exactly 50 ml of 100 mg/L Ni solution and 2.5 g of the adsorbents were poured into separate
glass beakers, and the pH of each solution was adjusted using 0.1 M NaOH. The beakers were
placed in an electric water bath shaker for 20 minutes at 120 rpm. This was done for pH values
of 1.0–8.0. The resulting solutions were filtered and the concentrations determined using the
AAS.
2.2.3. Effect of adsorbent dose on adsorption
Up to 50 ml of 100 mg/L prepared adsorbate was poured into separate beakers and various
weighed amounts of the adsorbents (0.2–1.4 g) were added to each of the beakers. The beakers
were placed in an electric water bath shaker for 20 minutes at 120 rpm. The resulting filtered
concentrations were measured with the AAS.
Olufemi & Eniodunmo 437

2.2.4. Effect of adsorbate dose on adsorption

A 50 ml of 100 mg/L adsorbate was prepared using distilled water in two 250 ml beakers and
2.5 g of both adsorbents were placed into the adsorbate solutions. The beakers were placed in
an electric water bath shaker for 20 minutes at 120 rpm. This step was carried out at adsorbate
concentrations of 20–100 mg/L. The final concentrations of the filtrates were determined with
the AAS.
2.2.5. Effect of contact time on adsorption
Exactly 50 ml of 100 mg/L adsorbate was poured into separate glass beakers. Up to 2.5 g of the
adsorbents were added into the beakers containing the adsorbate, and the beakers were placed in
the electric water bath shaker at 120 rpm for 5 minutes. This step was made at varying contact
times, from 5 to 60 minutes. The resulting mixtures were filtered and placed in the AAS to
measure their concentrations.
2.2.6. Effect of particle size on adsorption
Exactly 50 ml of 100 mg/L of the adsorbate solution was poured into separate glass beakers.
Exactly 2.5 g and 53 microns of each adsorbent were then mixed with the adsorbate, and the
beakers were placed in an electric water bath shaker for 20 minutes at 120 rpm. This step was
made for varying particle sizes, up to 250 microns. The final filtrate concentrations were
determined with the AAS.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Effect of Adsorbent Dose on Adsorption
From Figure 1, it can be seen that the percentage removal of each adsorbent rose with
increasing adsorbent dosage, but tended to remain constant at about 1.3 g. This may be due to
overlapping of the adsorption sites as a result of overcrowding of the adsorbent particles. A
similar explanation was given by Suresha and Deepa (2014) for the biosorption of Ni(II) ions
from aqueous solution using Araucaria cookie leaves.

Figure1 Effect of varying adsorbent doses on adsorption

3.2. Effect of pH on Adsorption

Figure 2 shows that increments in pH resulted in a high percentage removal, and remained
constant for pH values of about 6 to 8. This is due to the fact that pH has a significant effect on
adsorption because it affects the solubility of metal ions, the concentration of counter ions on
the functional group of the adsorbent, and the degree of ionization of the adsorbate during the
reaction. Sorption does not seem to occur in highly acidic and alkaline conditions because
hydrogen ions and hydroxyl ions compete for active sites on the adsorbent surface, as reported
by Shah et al. (2016).
438 Adsorption of Nickel(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution using Banana Peel and Coconut Shell

Figure 2 Effect of varying pH on adsorption

3.3. Effect of Contact Time on Adsorption

It is evident from Figure 3 that an increase in contact time favors only adsorption using banana
peel as the adsorbent. Decreasing the contact time between the solution and coconut shell would
improve the percentage removal. It seems that banana peel has more capacity than coconut shell
for adsorption. Increases in time are expected to enhance sorption until saturation at
equilibrium. From the observed phenomenon, the optimized maximum uptake of banana peel
compared to coconut shell seems to be higher, as reported separately by Annadurai et al.,
(2002) and Aziz et al. (2005).

Figure 3 Effect of contact time on adsorption

3.4. Effect of Temperature on Adsorption

As shown in Figure 4, with an increase in temperature the percentage removal decreases as a
result of the desorption taking place; that is, the nickel ions do not attach themselves properly to
the adsorbent as the temperature is increased over time. Naturally, temperature increases the
kinetic energy of the ions and molecules in solution, which has an adverse effect on the
adsorption. Similar accounts were given by Matouq et al. (2015) for the sorption of nickel onto
moringa pods, and by Hannachi et al. (2014) for the adsorption of nitrate ions onto a
membrane.

Figure 4 Effect of temperature on adsorption

Olufemi & Eniodunmo 439

3.5. Effect of Adsorbate Concentration on Adsorption

Increasing the adsorbate concentration slightly reduced the percentage removal for banana,
while it appeared constant for coconut shell, as shown in Figure 5. Increasing adsorbate
concentration presented a situation whereby more ions were provided to be adsorbed, without
increasing the adsorbent quantity. This led to supersaturation of the active sites available for
adsorption. Matouq et al. (2015) and Khelifi et al. (2016) similarly reported that as the initial
concentration for metal ions increases, the removal percentage decreases for a fixed adsorbent
dose and contact time. This behavior was also explained by the limited active site on the
adsorbent surface.

Figure5 Effect of adsorbate concentration

3.6. Effect of Particle Size on Adsorption

As shown in Figure 6, the percentage removal by adsorption fell with increased particle size.
This could be explained from the fact that as the particle size increased, the active available
surface area decreased, which hindered adsorption for both adsorbents. The same parametric
observation was made by Hossain et al. (2012).

Figure 6 Percentage Removal with Varying Particle Size

3.7. Theoretical Statistical Experiment Design

Design Expert 9 was used to design the experiment. It was employed to check for the
interdependence of more than one factor by identifying their overall effect. A full factorial
experiment design was used. Subsequently, the percentage removal was calculated.
3.7.1. Full factorial design
The main factors (adsorbent dose, temperature and contact time) were selected, as well as their
factor levels, coded as 1 (low) and +1 (high), as seen in Table 1. A full 23 factorial design was
employed and a matrix generated. The factor levels were coded as 1 (low) and +1 (high), as
seen in the Table. The percentage removal results obtained are presented in Table 2.
440 Adsorption of Nickel(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution using Banana Peel and Coconut Shell

Table 1 High and low values for the main factors

Factors Low (1) High (+1)
Adsorbent dose 0.5 g 4.5 g
Contact time 30 mins 120 mins
Temperature 25oC 65oC

Table 2 Percentage removal obtained

Run 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Banana peel 40.42 47.23 55.89 61.02 68.45 74.53 78.16 80.1
% Removal
Coconut shell 41.80 44.40 50.70 56.90 67.20 72.50 70.30 68.4

As previously observed, banana peel seems to be a better adsorbent for nickel under similar
conditions, which is confirmed by the findings of Annadurai et al. (2002) and Aziz et al.,
(2005).
3.8. Analysis of Variance and Parametric Statistical Significance
The ANOVA and Bonferroni-Holm Posthoc significance test results for Nickel (II) ion
adsorption by banana peel and coconut shell with varying parameters are given in Table 3. The
statistical computation presented was carried out with the aid of Daniel’s XL Toolbox Version
6.70 © 20082013 software.

Table 3 Bonferroni-holm posthoc significance test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for
Nickel (II) ion adsorption with banana peel and coconut shell, using varying parameters
Bonferroni-Holm Posthoc
Group Group Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Test
Significance Test
1 2
PC P Significant SSB SSW DFB DFW F P
WB PR 0.0167 1.449E-11 Yes 17283.91 2
573.67 18 271.15 3.64
WC PR 0.0250 3.712E-11 Yes
pHB PR 0.0167 0.000846 Yes 9841.02 2
13391.79 21 7.72 0.0031
pHC PR 0.0250 0.002678 Yes
tB PR 0.0167 1.35E-05 Yes 7503.19 2 3.91E-06
6658.63 33 18.59
tC PR 0.0250 0.000198 Yes
TB PR 0.0167 7.59E-06 Yes 5025.17 2 8.42E-07
2275.82 24 26.50
TC PR 0.0250 0.000176 Yes
CAB PR 0.0250 0.409121 No 414.70 2
4623.60 12 0.54 0.60
CAC PR 0.0500 0.780217 No
SB PR 0.0167 0.041120 No 23428.15 2
24204.77 12 5.81 0.0172
SC PR 0.0250 0.043023 No

where CA is the adsorbate concentration (mg/L), CAB is the adsorbate concentration with banana
peel (mg/L), CAC is the adsorbate concentration with coconut shell (mg/L), DFB is the degrees of
freedom between groups, DFW is the degrees of freedom within groups, F is Fisher's ratio, P is
the probability factor, PC is the critical probability factor, pHB is the measured pH with respect
to banana peel, pHC is the measured pH with respect to coconut shell, PR is the percentage
removal of ions (% removal), SB is the banana peel particle size (µm), SC is the coconut shell
particle size (µm), SSB is the sum of squares between the groups, SSW is the sum of squares
within the groups, t is the mixing time (min), tB is the time with respect to banana peel (min), tC
is the time with respect to coconut shell (min), T is the temperature (K), TB is the temperature
with respect to banana peel (oC), TC is the temperature with respect to coconut shell (oC), W is
Olufemi & Eniodunmo 441

the weight of the adsorbent (g), WB is the adsorbent dose for banana peel (g); and WC is the
adsorbent dose for coconut shell (g).
The parameters investigated show the actual values of the sum of squares within and between
the groups. There exists a statistically wide variation between the individually investigated
parameters and the percentage removal of Nickel (II) ion groups at the 95% confidence interval,
as the F and P values are mostly within the expected ranges. Fisher's F is a ratio of the variance
between groups to the variance within groups, and P is a probability factor that must be less
than 0.05 in the ANOVA analysis.
The degree of freedom between the groups was 2, while the degree of freedom within them
varied from 12 to 33. The F and P values implied a strong dependence of PR on the various
parameters investigated. The Bonferroni-Holm Posthoc parametric significance test for various
parameters investigated showed a strong dependence or significance on each other, except for
the relationships between PR and CAB, CAC, SB and SC with P values greater than the PC values in
the 95% confidence interval. In comparison with previous literature, the parametric variables
that furnished the maximum percentage removal of ions with similar adsorbent or adsorbate
systems conformed with the work of Chaudhari (2009) and Abbasi et al., (2013). In agreement
with the statistical Bonferroni-Holm Posthoc parametric significance test in Table 3, none were
obtained under adsorbate nor particle size variation. In conformity with the results obtained
from this work, similarities between them can be drawn, as the maximum percentage removal
obtained from the use of banana peel was 80.3%, and from coconut shell it was 80%, under the
same conditions of pH variation.
3.8.1. Adsorption isotherms
The Langmuir isotherm was expressed using Equation 3 below:

= + (3)

Q0 is the Langmuir constant for maximum adsorption capacity, and b is the Langmuir constant.
The essential characteristics of the Langmuir isotherm can be expressed in terms of a
dimensionless constant separation factor or equilibrium parameter, RL, which is defined in
Equation 4 by:
= (4)
where Co is the initial concentration.
The Freundlich isotherm is often expressed in Equation 5 as:

Log = Log Kf + Log (5)

where KF and n are the Freundlich constants.

The Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherm constants are given in Table 4, while the
Temkin and Dubinin-Radushkevich adsorption isotherm constants are presented in Table 5. AT
is the Temkin isotherm equilibrium binding constant (L/mg); B is the Temkin constant related
to heat of adsorption; bT is the Temkin isotherm constant (J/mol); Ε is the Dubinin–
Radushkevich isotherm parameter; Kad is the Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm constant
(mol2/kJ2); qs is the theoretical isotherm saturation capacity (mg/g); R is the Universal Gas
Constant (8.314 J/mol K); R2 is the Coefficient of Regression; and T is Temperature (K).
442 Adsorption of Nickel(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution using Banana Peel and Coconut Shell

Table 4 Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherm constants

Langmuir Constants Freundlich Constants
Adsorbent
Qo(mg/g) b (L/mg) R² RL KF (L/mg) n R²
Banana Peel 1.47 0.018 0.9821 0.356 0.004 0.263 0.9202
Coconut Shell 2.57 0.016 0.9744 0.384 0.016 0.33 0.9619

Table 5 Temkin and Dubinin-Radushkevich adsorption isotherm constants

Temkin Constants Dubinin-RadushkevichConstants
Adsorbent B AT qs ED
B R² Kads(mol2/kJ2) R²
(J/mol) (L/g) (mg/g) (kJ/mol)
Banana
19.308 0.034 117.55 0.7312 0.0005 23.96 0.8338 44.72
Peel
Coconut
17.513 0.036 129.6 0.8355 0.0004 22.21 0.9087 50
Shell

From Table 4, it can be seen that the Langmuir isotherm for banana peel gave the best fit for the
adsorption operation, similar to the observations of Amer et al., (2015). Favorable adsorption
was achieved as a result of the fact that 0<RL< 1. In Table 5,the Temkin and Dubinin-
Radushkevich adsorption isotherms also gave good R2 values, but are not as high as those of the
Langmuir isotherm obtained for banana peel, as shown in Table 4.
The Temkin and Dubinin-Radushkevich constants were both accounted for in order to estimate
certain energy adsorption related parameters. The Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm is more
general than that of Langmuir because its deviations are not based on ideal assumptions, such as
the equipotential of sorption sites, absence of steric hindrances between sorbed and incoming
particles, and surface homogeneity at the microscopic level. The isotherm with the highest R2
value proves to be a better choice in explaining sorption energies. From Table 5, the mean free
energy obtained, ED, was greater than 8 kJ/mol, which is an indication from Dubinin-
Radushkevicht hat the operation suggested chemisorptions. Rao and Khan (2017) suggest close
observations.
3.8.2. Kinetic studies
The pseudo first order kinetic model is given in Equation 6 as:

log ( qe-qt) = log qe – (K1/2.303)t (6)

The pseudo second order kinetic model is given in Equation 7 as:

= + (7)

where, qt is the amount of solute adsorbed at time t in mg/g, h and K1are constants.
The constants from the plots of the pseudo first and second order kinetics are given in Table 6.
It can be seen that the pseudo second order kinetics gave a better fit for the two adsorbents,
which is similar to the reports of Amer et al. (2015) and Ajayi-Banji et al. (2016) for the
biosorption of contaminated wastewater with coconut shell husk.
Olufemi & Eniodunmo 443

Table 6 Pseudo first and second order kinetic constants

Pseudo First Order Constants Pseudo Second Order Constants
Adsorbent -1 2
K (min ) R qe (mg/g) h (gmg-1min-1) qe (mg/g) R2
Banana Peel 0.044 0.1106 0.663 0.047 0.0140 0.8537
Coconut Shell 0.025 0.0387 0.196 0.047 0.0099 0.7628

Figures 7a and 7b give the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images of banana peel and
coconut shell before and after adsorption at 671 microns (×400 magnification), respectively. In
both cases, the swelling of the adsorbents and site occupation of sorbent active sites are
noticeable.

(a) Banana Peel (b) Coconut Shell

Figure 7 Scanning electron microscope images of banana peel and coconut shell before and after
adsorption at 671 microns (×400 Magnification)

4. CONCLUSION
It has been shown that banana peel and coconut shell are both good adsorbents for the retrieval
of Ni (II) ions with consideration of the six parameters, but that banana peel has a higher
percentage removal for most of the factors. The ideal pH for obtaining the maximum amount of
Ni (II) ion uptake by the adsorbents was 8, so this can be considered to be the optimum dosage
in specific conditions. A very good comparative percentage, similar to existing works, was also
obtained in this study. From the experimental approach design, the highest percentage removal
for banana peel suggested an adsorbent dose of 4.5 g, contact time of 120 mins and temperature
of 25oC, while the conditions for the maximum Ni (II) ion uptake using coconut shell are 4.5 g
adsorbent dose, 30 min contact time and temperature of 25oC. The percentage removal of Ni
(II) ions was found to decrease with increasing temperature for both adsorbents, which
indicated the exothermic nature of the process. The adsorption operation was in close
agreement with the Langmuir isotherm for both adsorbents, indicating a monolayer adsorption
process. The constants obtained from the Langmiur and Freundlich adsorption isotherms had
similar values to those of Chaudhari (2009). The statistical test with ANOVA and Bonferroni-
Holm Posthoc parametric significance test gave good insight into the significance and
interdependencies of variables, or the parameters needed for improved and more focused future
operations. Lastly, banana peel and coconut shell are effective adsorbents for the removal of
Nickel(II) ions from their aqueous solution, with the highest removal for coconut shell obtained
at 75.9%, and at 77.8% for banana peel, at 20 oC.These adsorbents are cost effective and could
be considered for the treatment of heavy metals present in industrial wastewater.

5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The supporting services and useful advice during the experimental stage of this work provided
by the Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, as well as the Central Research
Laboratory, of the University of Lagos, Akoka, Yaba, Lagos are greatly appreciated.
444 Adsorption of Nickel(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution using Banana Peel and Coconut Shell

6. REFERENCES
Abbas, M.N., Abbas, F.S., Ibrahim, S.A., 2014. Cyanide Removal from Wastewater by using
Banana Peel. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Volume 4(5), pp. 239–247
Abbasi, Z., Alikarami, M., Nezhad, E.R., Moradi, F., Moradi, V., 2013. Adsorptive Removal of
Co2+ and Ni2+ by Peels of Banana from Aqueous Solution. Universal Journal of Chemistry,
Volume 1(3), pp. 90–95
Ajayi-Banji, A., Ajimo, A., Igbode, I.O., 2016. Biosorbability of Coconut Husk Char in
Polyatomic Ions Sequestration from Contaminated Surface Water. International Journal of
Technology, Volume 7(5), pp. 748–754
Amer, M.W., Ahmad, R.A., Awwad, A.M., 2015. Biosorption of Cu(II), Ni(II), Zn(II) and
Pb(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution by Sophora japonica Pods Powder. International
Journal of Industrial Chemistry, Volume 6(1), pp. 67–75
Annadurai, G., Juang, R., Lee, D., 2002. Adsorption of Heavy Metals using Banana and Orange
Peels. Water Science and Technology, Volume 47(1), pp. 185–190
Ayub, S., Khorasgani F., 2014. Adsorption Process for Wastewater Treatment by using
Coconut Shell Research. Journal of Chemical Sciences, Volume 4(12), pp. 1–8
Aziz, H.A., Adlan, M.N., Hui, C.S., Zahari, M.S.M., Hameed, B. H., 2005. Removal of Ni, Cd,
Pb, Zn and Colour from Aqueous Solutions using Potential Low Cost Adsorbents. Indian
Journal of Engineering and Material Sciences, Volume 12(3), pp. 248–258
Chaudari, U.E., 2009. Coconut Shell: a Carrier for the Removal of Bismuth from Aqueous
Solution. International Journal of Chemistry Science, Volume 7(1), pp. 71–79
Divakaran, R., Paul, A., Anoop, K.K., Kuriakose, V.J., Rajesh, R., 2012. Adsorption of
Nickel(II) and Chromium(VI) Ions by Chitin and Chitosan from Aqueous Solutions
Containing Both Ions. International Journal of Science and Technology Research, Volume
1(1), pp. 43–50
Garba, Z.N., Ugbaga, N.I., Abdullahi, A.K., 2016. Evaluation of Optimum Adsorption
Conditions for Ni(II) and Cd(II) Removal from Aqueous Solution by Modified Plantain
Peels (MPP). Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Volume 5(2),
pp. 170–179
Gonen, F., Serin, D., 2012. Adsorption Study on Orange Peel: Removal of Nickel (II) Ions from
Aqueous Solution. African Journal of Biotechnology, Volume 11(5), pp. 1250–1258
Gong, W., Yu, Y., Liang, G., Liu, X., Cui, B., Bai, J., Han, P., 2018. Factor Effects and
Mechanisms of the Adsorption of Hg(II), Cd(II) and Ni(II) on Charged Liposomes.
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Volume 538, pp.
460–466
Hannachi, C., Guesmi, F., Missaoui, K., Hamrouni, B., 2014. Application of Adsorption
Models for Fluoride, Nitrate and Sulfate Ion Removal by AMX membrane. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 5(1), pp. 60–69
Hossain, M.A., Ngo, H.H., Guo, W.S., Nguyen, T.V., 2012. Biosorption of Cu(II) from Water
by Banana Peel based Biosorbent: Experiments and Models of Adsorption and Desorption.
Journal of Water sustainability, Volume 2(1), pp. 87–104
Idris, U.D., Aigbodion, V.S., Abubakar, I.J., Nwoye, C.I., 2015. Eco-friendly Asbestos free
Brake-pad: Using Banana Peels. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences,
Volume 27(2), pp. 185–192
Khelifi, O., Nacef, M., Affoune, A.M., 2016. Biosorption of Nickel(II) Ions from Aqueous
Solutions by using Chicken Eggshells as Low-cost Biosorbent. Algerian Journal of
Environmental Science and Technology, Volume 2(1), pp. 1–12
Matouq, M., Jildeh, N., Qtaishat, M., Hindiyeh, M., Al Syouf, M.Q., 2015. The Adsorption
Kinetics and Modeling for Heavy Metals Removal from Wastewater by Moringa Pods.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, Volume 3(2), pp. 775–784
Olufemi & Eniodunmo 445

Okafor, P., Okon, P., Daniel, E., Ebenso, E., 2012. Adsorption Capacity of Coconut (Cocos
nucifera L.) Shell for Lead, Copper, Cadmium and Arsenic from Aqueous Solutions.
International Journal of Electrochemical Science, Volume 7(12), pp. 12354–12369
Olayinka, O.K., Oyedeji, A.O., Oyeyiola, O.A., 2009. Removal of Chromium and Nickel Ions
from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption on Modified Coconut Husk. African Journal of
Environmental Science and Technology, Volume 3(10), pp. 286–293
Pino, G.H., de Mesquita, L.M.S., Torem, M.L., Pinto, G.A.S., 2006. Biosorption of Cadmium
by Green Coconut Shell Powder. Minerals Engineering, Volume 19(5), pp. 380–387
Rao, R.A.K., Khan, U., 2017. Adsorption of Ni(II) on Alkali Treated Pineapple Residue
(Ananas comosus L.): Batch and Column Studies. Groundwater for Sustainable
Development, Volume 5, pp. 244–252
Shah, J., Kumar, S., Sharma, S., Sharma, R., Sharma, R., 2016. Removal of Nickel from
Aqueous Solution by using Low Cost Adsorbents: A Review. International Journal of
Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS), Volume 2(7), pp. 48–73
Sheng, G., Huang, C., Chen, G., Sheng, J., Ren, X., Hu, B., Ma, J., Wang, X., Huang, Y.,
Alsaedi, A., Hayat, T., 2018. Adsorption and Co-Adsorption of Graphene Oxide and Ni(II)
on Iron Oxides: a Spectroscopic and Microscopic Investigation. Environmental Pollution,
Volume 233, pp. 125–131
Soco, E., Kalembkiewicz, J., 2013. Adsorption of Nickel(II) and Copper(II) Ions from Aqueous
Solution by Coal Fly Ash. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, Volume 1(3),
pp. 581–588
Song, C., Cheng, S., Wu, S., Tao, C., Shao, M., Gao, G., 2013. Adsorption Studies of Coconut
Shell Carbons Prepared by KOH Activation for Removal of Lead (II) from Aqueous
Solutions. Sustainability, Volume 6(1), pp. 86–98
Suresha, S., Deepa, C.N., 2014. Biosorption of Ni(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution using Leaves
of Araucaria cookie. Factors influencing the Biosorption of Nickel. International Journal
of Applied Sciences (IJAS), Singaporean Journal of Scientific Research (SJSR), Volume
6(1), pp. 9–16
Taimur, K., Muhammad, A., Chadhuri, M., 2012. Banana Peel: A Low Cost Adsorbent for
Removal of Reactive Dye from Aqueous Solution. Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
Tharannum, S., Krishna, V., Nandini, V., Shruthi, P., 2015. Toxic Heavy Metal Chromium
Remediation by Processed Low Cost Adsorbent Green Coconut Shell. The Online Journal
of Science and Technology, Volume 5(1), pp. 1–6