Organizational Change in Nokia
Organizational Change in Nokia
CASE STUDY:
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE IN NOKIA
A Case Study
Submitted to the Faculty of the
Claro M. Recto Academy of Advanced Studies
Lyceum of the Philippines University Cavite
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements of the Degree
Master in International Hospitality Management
From its humble beginning in 1865 as a single paper mill operation, Nokia has found
and nurtured success over the years in a range of industrial sectors including cable, paper
products, rubber boots, tires, televisions and mobile phones.
an industry leader in the transition to 5G wireless technology by offering the only end-to-
end 5G network portfolio available on a global basis.
In 2016 Nokia re-entered the mobile handset business with a licensing agreement
with HMD Global allowing them to offer phones under the Nokia brand. (Nokia, 2019)
Nokia was one of the leading producers of mobile phones in the world during the 90s
and 00s. In 2007, Nokia was considered to be one of the most valuable brands in the
world and is the number one seller of mobile phones to its consumers, especially in Asia
and Africa.
Nokia was one of the pioneers in the smartphone market, however, it has faced
decrease in sales in 2012. This was due to the popular demand of Apple and Samsung for
their new smart phones released last 2007. The Symbian Series operating system of
Nokia failed to maintain its lead as Apple introduced its iPhone, and Samsung had
Android as its operating system. Nokia neglected its possible partnership with Windows
phone until 2011 even when the decline of sales was evident.
Nokia underestimated its competitors and was confident with the strength of their
brand, being them as the number one seller of mobile phones. It has only continued to
improve the mobile phones’ hardware and overlooked the competitiveness of its
software’s features. The company believed that they will be able to innovate and match
the products of their competitors through the improvement of the products’ hardware
design rather than focusing on its software components. This has proven to be
unsuccessful for Nokia, leading to a huge loss of sales and profit for their company.
Due to the arising problem, it was only then when Nokia decided to sell their
company to Microsoft. This change in the company focused in leadership and operational
structure, with the idea that it will have a laudable competitiveness in the smartphone
market.
Digging deeper to what really caused this slow movement from Nokia against their
competitors was that employees find the company’s top managers to be “extremely
temperamental” who regularly shouted at people “at the top of their lungs” (Huy & Vuori,
2015). Although employees at Nokia knew that they needed a better operating system to
match the competitors’ iOS and Android, it became difficult for them to let the
management know about this as making a new operating system would take years and
that they did not want to be the bearer of bad news. Their top management was
deliberately lied to as middle managers were afraid of disappointing their bosses. Middle
managers were also forced to remain silent, and provide optimistic and filtered reports to
the top managers.
III. Intervention
In 2012, Nokia has also replaced its Chairman, along with three board directors (Huy
& Vuori, 2018). The new CEO, Mr. Elop, was also able to refocus the business on
leadership, with managers taking decisions and responsibility; and markets, with
innovation driven by people competing in key mobile phone segments. (Roy, 2013)
Still with the decline of sale and profits for Nokia, the company has decided to pursue
the retrenchment strategy, laying off four thousand (4,000) employees in Mexico and
Europe as it moved its manufacturing in Asia.
The result of Nokia’s intervention to prevent further losses was a success as the
partnership with Microsoft was able to keep Nokia afloat. The company was also able to
address the issue between the top management, to middle management, down to its
employees. They were able to improve the emotional relationship between the board and
management, thus helping it to communicate with each other better. The board influenced
the hyper-cautious and self-protective managers out of their shells with principles such as
“No news is bad news, bad news is good news, and good news is no news.” This made
conversations and discussions between the directors and managers to be more honest and
fuller of depth. (Huy & Vuori, 2018)
V. Conclusion
It was evident that Nokia was the leading mobile phone during the 90s to 00s.
However, the resistance to change the perspective of its managers/directors lead to its
major losses when their competitors have proven to do better in terms of sales. The
change done in Nokia, and its partnership with Microsoft, has made Nokia still relevant
in the mobile phone industry, however it was never able to redeem its spot in being the
number one brand/provider for its consumers.
Huy, Q.N., & Vuori, T.O. (2018). How Nokia Bounced Back (With the Help of the
Board). Retrieved from https://knowledge.insead.edu/strategy/how-nokia-
bounced-back-with-the-help-of-the-board-10211
Huy, Q.N., & Vuori, T.O. (2015). Who Killed Nokia? Nokia Did. Retrieved from
https://knowledge.insead.edu/strategy/who-killed-nokia-nokia-did-4268