Chapter 3 Example
Chapter 3 Example
STUDIES
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Preliminaries
In chapter two we have traced the theoretical foundation of the ESP field
including definitions of ESP, its origin, classification, developments besides its
main strands namely EAP and EOP and the linguistic and non-linguistic issues
related to it. Before this, we have touched upon the term ELT, its varieties and
the position of English as a lingua franca. This chapter includes two main
sections, the first deals with the notion of 'need analysis', its status in ESP globe,
its different kinds and the famous approach to it. The second section focuses on
studies incorporating actual needs analysis carried out in different places. In one
way or another these studies have relevance to the present study on several
grounds including procedures used, aims, context, nature of subjects and needs
etc. The review of the studies will be run under the following headings:
Needs Analysis (NA) figured notably in the literature of language teaching for
30 years and has been stressed on learners' communicative needs. Historically,
the term 'analysis of needs' first appeared in India in the 1920s (Howat, 1984;
White, 1988; West, 1994). However, referring to Berwick (1989), (Khan,
2007:41) points out that two factors led to needs - based curriculum planning in
modem times, one of them was related to the public aid to education programs in
the USA in the 1960s when identification of needs was legislative requirement
for receiving finances for activities carried out by publicly funded educational
and service-providing agencies. The second factor was the behavioral objective
74
movement which emphasized precision and accountability in the educational
system by insisting on specification of goals in measurable form.
For language planning, the emergence of NA can be traced back to the 1970s
when the formal concept of NA was largely established at that time by the
Council of Europe in the field of ESP (Richetrich, 1980; Mountford, 1981;
Nunan, 1988). In fact the growth of NA is a result of looking at "syllabi that have
a functional rather than structural base and the placing of learner in a central
position in designing methodological thinking" (Mountford, 1981).
It can be said that from 1970s upto date NA has become the comer stone in ESP.
Its centrality has been emphasized by a number of practitioners (Munby, 1978
Richetrich and Chancerel, 1987; Strevens, 1988; Hutchinson and Waters, 1987
Berwick, 1989; Brindley, 1989; Robinson, 1991; West, 1994; Jordan, 1997
Dudley-Evans and St John, 1998 and others). They consider it as the major
defining feature in ESP. Not only this (McDounph, 1984:9) argues that NA is
"synonymous with ESP, and it is difficult to think of one without the other comes
to mind". The centrality of NA derives from its crucial role in both learning and
teaching processes. In the former, the students can offer their views and attitudes
regarding their needs in order to enable the finding out of materials which would
match their accurate needs as they are adult learners and can perceive their
accurate needs (Sculthorp, 1974; Altman, 1980). In the latter, "it is worthwhile
for ESP practitioners to juxtapose their perception to the students' perception in
order to extract suitable materials". (Abdullah, 2005:50).
In fact, it is difficult to have one definition of the concept 'needs analysis' as this
term is "controversial one in the field of ELT in general and the field of ESP in
particular" (Brindley, 1989:28) where "the very concept of language needs has
been never clearly defined and remains at the best ambiguous" (Richetrich,
1983:2) and "what is finally established as 'needs' is a matter for agreement and
judgement not discovery" (Lawson, 1979:37). Nevertheless, a number of
75
definitions and views of 'need' and 'needs analysis' are provided by a number of
linguists. They are as follows:
76
language once he/she has learnt it" and Process-oriented needs which refers to
"what the learner needs to do to actually acquire the language". In the same
direction Brindley (1989) uses 'narrow' for 'product' or 'goal-oriented' and 'broad'
for 'process-oriented'. The distinction is also made between 'subjective' needs and
'objective' needs, Richterich (1972, cited in Hasan, 2008:31). According to
Richterich, objective needs are those which can be diagnosed by teachers on the
bases of analysis of personal data about learners along with information about
their language proficiency level and patterns of language use, whereas, subjective
needs (interpreted as wants, desires, expectations or other psychological
manifestation of a lack) cannot be diagnosed and are, in many cases, even stated
by learners themselves. (Nunan, 1988:44) draws the distinction between the
'objective' and 'subjective' needs stating that "objective needs result in content
specification form an analysis of the target communicative situations in which
learners are likely to find themselves. Being derived from analysis of the target
situation, they can be carried out in the absence of the learners. Subjective needs,
on the other hand, are derived from the learners themselves, while there is a
tendency to equate objective needs with the specification of content, subjective
needs with specification of methodology". Similarly, needs can be described as
'Felt' needs or 'Perceived' needs. (Berwick, 1989:55) states that "felt needs are
those, which learners have. The compotation - is one of unsophisticated,
egocentric expressions of desired future state which individuals can be induced to
express if planners ask the right questions. Perceived needs are judgements of
certified experts about educational gaps in other people's experience". In a
classification by Hutchinson and Waters (1987) needs are divided into: target
needs and learning needs. They divide target needs into: necessities, lacks and
wants, considering them as the ones that the learner needs to do in target
situation, while learning needs are what the learner needs to do in order to learn.
According to what has been mentioned above, the terms have been introduced to
describe the different factors and perspectives which have helped the concept of
need to grow. Dudley-Evans and St John (1998) have reviewed the work dealing
77
with different types of needs and summarize an existing confusing plethora of
terms as under:
78
materials design and evaluation, this will lead to increase their motivation and
confidence in working on their own as well as learning to take responsibility for
their own learning (Kuter, 2000).
Recently, one can notice that the significance of NA for devising courses and
course books and the kind of teaching and learning that takes place is emphasized
by many researchers (Richterich, 1983; Hutchinson and Waters, 1987; Robinson,
1991; Jordon, 1997; Dudley-Evans and St John, 1998; Long, 2005 and others).
However, these researchers recommend that NA should be an on-going process
carried out during the life of the course since the learners' needs, attitudes and
approaches may change. This can help both the administrators and the teachers to
take the changes into account in a way that promotes learners success and
fulfillment.
Abdullah (2005:76) indicates that it will be difficult for ESP learners to learn
ESP course well and cope well with what they have learnt if they are not aware
of their needs. Further, the ESP teachers cannot teach the ESP course correctly
and handle the teaching process properly unless they fully understand their
learners' needs. As stated earlier in this chapter (3.2) the vital role of NA in the
ESP world is stressed by many practifioners. In fact NA serves a number of
purposes. It "aids administrators, teachers and tutors with learners placement, and
in developing materials, curricula, skills assessment, teaching approaches and
teacher training" Weddel et al (1997 quoted in Abdullah, 2005:37).
3.6 Approaches to NA
79
developments have stemmed from it or as a result of reaction to it" (Jordan,
1997:24). In the words of Phan (2005), Munby's model has influenced ESP
course development in the sense that it raises both theoretical and practical
problems to be argued among authors" (p. 56). Under this influence 'situations'
and 'functions' were discussed within the framework of needs analysis. Based on
this model. Chamber (1980) introduced the term Target Situation Analysis
(TSA). He describes it as "communication in the target situation" (p. 29). He
elaborates "... it goes into the target situation, collects and analyze the data in
order to establish the communication that really occur - its function, forms and
frequencies and provides a basis for selecting the long-range aims of the course.
In fact, many researchers in the field of TSA followed Munby's model. Most
subsequent target needs analysis research was based on it for the reason that it
"offers comprehensive data banks and target performance" (Robinson, 1991:8).
• Purposive domain: this category establishes the type of ESP, and then the
purpose which the target language will be used for at the end of the course.
80
• Setting: the physical setting specifying the spatial and temporal aspects
of the situation where English will be used, and the psychological setting
specifying the different environment in which English will be used.
• Interaction: identifies the learner's interlocutors and predicts relationship
between them.
• Instrumentality: specifies the medium, i.e. whether the language to be
used is written, spoken or both; mode, i.e. whether the language to be
used is in the form of monologue, dialogue or any other; and channel of
communication, i.e. whether it is face to face, radio, or any other.
• Dialect: dialects learners will have to understand or produce in terms of
their spatial, temporal, or social aspect.
• Communicative key: the manner in which the participants will have to
do the activities comprising an event, e.g. politely or impolitely.
• Communicative event: states what the participants will have to do
productively or receptively.
• Target level: level of linguistic proficiency at the end of the ESP course
which might be different for different skills. (Sanghori, 2008:7)
In the second stage of the model the user must take the activities with their
communicative keys and decide which of three alternative ways of processing
them is appropriate. These alternatives are: specification of syllabus content by
focusing on micro-skills, specification by focusing on micro-functions,
specification by focusing on linguistic forms.
Munby in his model excludes the variables that affect the teaching/learning
process such as administration constraints and recourses, learner characteristics
and expectations, methodology, etc. He claims that such variables belong to the
subsequent stage and should only be considered after the syllabus specification
has been obtained (Munby, 1978:217). This claim, in fact, made the model open
to criticism. Many academics and linguists criticize this point and consider it as
one of the most serious weaknesses points of the model. For example. Hawkey
(1980:81) and Flowerdew (1995:25) consider the relegation of learners' variables
by Munby to epilogue, considering them as subsequent to the specification of the
81
syllabus is a major failing of his model, because these variables are "important
factors" in language learning and teaching (Dudley-Evans and St John, 1998:122)
and the "fundamental variables in course design" (McDoungh, 1984:27). West
(1994:9-10) and Jordan (1997:24) also criticize Mundy's negligence of
constraints. They indicate that the model should consider practical constraints at
the start of the needs analysis procedure. For Phan (2005) these variables are
"actual facts... which actually operate a syllabus or determine how a syllabus
works" (p. 3). He adds that ignoring such variables "may addict the learner in the
sense that no workable and thorough syllabus could be implemented without
them" (Phan, 2005:4). Accordingly, it can be said that theoretically, needs
analysis cannot be completed without considering these variables on one hand
and practically, it is impossible to separate the language needs from these factors
on the other hand, because as Bin Tayea (1996:11) argues "if such factors are not
considered, the language needs will be an idealization that has nothing to do with
specific position".
82
(1991) says that the model "gives no indication as to how the data for actual
students might be collected (p30). Phan (2005) elaborates that "Munby expects
learners to obtain a single target in spite of the fact that their targets are
variables". That is to say Munby shows no way to discriminate systematically
between more and less significant variables. Mead (1982) puts it another way "all
the variables are of equal weight".
One of the shortcomings of Munby's model is that it is not a tool that can help the
learner effectively. Hawkey (1980) and West (1994) think that the model does
not pay enough attention to the learner's needs in the process of
learning/teaching. The model, for Hawkey can be considered as "a tool for course
designers rather than for the learners" (p. 81). According to West, it "it collects
data about the learner rather than from learner" (p.9). Hawkey (1980:91) argues
that Munby assumes a homogeneous learning context in his model, but in reality
this is not the case where heterogeneous is of dominance. Coleman says Munby's
"... idealisation of the language learners implies that groups of learners are static
and homogeneous" (p. 155). To him this is not true for all cases.
In spite of that, Hutchinson and Waters (1987) appreciate Munby's model than
criticize it. They do not hide their criticism of the model for representing '...
ultimate sterility of a language - centered approach to NA" (p. 54). They
continue stating that the model focuses on necessities and does not take into
account the learning needs nor it does make distinction between 'necessities',
'wants' and 'lacks'. They conclude that what we need is "a learning - centered
approach to NA not just a list of the linguistic features of the target situation as
Munby's CNP produces" (p. 187). In the line, Davies (1981) argues that the
model is about needs only and ignores "demand' "which is one that ripe to
83
analysis (p. 332). Bin Tayea (1996:11) and Afarah (2006:23) indicate that no
reference is made to the present situation or learning process. In other words, the
model does not consider the learners needs in the present situation nor does it
take into consideration the factors that may affect the learning process specially
those related to the learner. Phan (2005) puts his criticism as follows:
Munby seems forget the fact that learners are human beings who can
think, feel, sense, croak and be tired. That is why in his model,
leamers are seen as more passive and machine - like beings, who
either productively or receptively are presented by so many artificial
factors raised by Munby. It is far from the truth, (p. 57)
Munby's model has also been criticised on the language ground. West (1994:10)
points out that Munby fails to provide a procedure for converting the learner
profiles into a language syllabus. Davies (1981) and Mead (1982) observe that
Munby's work aims at providing language teachers with thorough syllabus "...
but CSD never get that for" (Davies, 1981:333) and Munby "nowhere spells out
what he means by the term 'syllabus' and its precise reference is in doubt".
(Mead, 1982: 75). Jordan (1997) in this regard says "the language items chosen
for the practice in ESP/EAP should reflect those used in real world, not the
language derived from social English as classified by Munby's model (p. 24).
Phan (2005) has revised most of these criticisms mentioned above. The
conclusion is that "Munby only makes links to parts of how people learn a
language". He elaborates "Munby's model fails to satisfy its audience and
customers since it only emphasizes sociolinguistic and linguistic aspects.
Moreover, it ignores vital down-to-earth facts to put the model into effect, such
as socio-cultural and administrative features" (p. 58).
The term Present Situation Analysis (PSA) was first proposed by Richterich and
Chancerel (1980) as a complement to TSA (Robinson, 1991; Tudor, 1996;
Jordan, 1997). While TSA tries to establish what the leamers are expected to be
like at the of the language course, this approach attempts to identify what they
84
are like at the beginning of it (Sanghori, 2008:10). "It estimates strengths and
weaknesses in language skills and learning experience" (Dudley-Evans and St
John, 1998:125). If the destination point to which the students need to get is to be
established, first the starting point has to be defined, and this is provided by
means of PSA. The sources of information in PSA approaches are the students
themselves, teaching establishment and user-institution e.g. place of work.
Surveys, questionnaires and interviews are used to collect data from these
sources. The required information focuses on levels of abilities, resources and
views on language teaching/learning. West (1994:10) mentions that two central
components are mostly included in this approach a) an inventory of potential
target needs expressed in terms of activities and b) a scale that is used to establish
the priorities among them, because "... we cannot or at least should not specifying
teaching materials without reference to the type of learner and his or her learning
objectives" (Mc Dounph, 1984:35).
As noted, within the realm of ESP, one cannot rely either on TSA or PSA as they
seem insufficient to enhance learning and teaching the required goals.
Consequently, the Learning - Central Approach emerged as a reaction to these
approaches in order to complete what is missing in them. It is Hutchinson and
Waters (1987) who strongly advocate this approach in which learners' learning
needs play a vital role as such analysis will help the practitioners to know "what
the learner needs to do in order to learn" (Hutchinson and Waters, 1987:54).
They draw distinction between learner-centered, which infers that 'learning is
totally determined by the learner' and learning-centered, which involves learning
'a process of negotiation between individuals and society' which includes in turn
teaching, syllabus, method, materials, etc (1987:172). Because ESP for them is
an "approach to language teaching which is directed by specific and apparent
reasons for learning" (1987: 16), they obviously advocate a process-oriented
approach, not product one. What learners should be taught according to this
approach are skills that enable them to reach their target, the process of learning
and motivation should be considered as well as the fact that different learners
85
learn in different ways (Sanghori, 2008:12). Hutchinson and Waters (1987)
consider knowing the starting point (PSA) and destination (TSA) is not
sufficient. Target situation can determine the destination but we must choose our
route according to the conditions of learning situation (resources, the learner's
knowledge, skills and learner's motivation for the study) (Dhubyani, 2004:32).
Hutchinson and Waters confirm that both; target needs and learning needs should
be taken into consideration. They elaborate:
The ESP learning situation and the target situation will both influence
the nature of the syllabus, materials, methodology and evaluation
procedures. Similarly each of these components will influence and be
influenced by others. (1987: 74).
For analyzing learning needs (Hutchinson and Waters, 1987:62-63) suggest a
framework which consists of several questions, which in turn are sub-divided
into some detail ones. The framework proposed by them is the following:
Nevertheless, there is a clear overlapping between this checklist and the Munbian
model. The only difference is that Munby suggests the implementation of the
variables after designing the syllabus (see 3.6.1) whereas Hutchinson and Waters
consider the checklist prior to the design of the syllabus. Anyhow, it can be
concluded that learner involvement in the process of NA will be helpful on
several grounds. It can help in deciding on the contents and on specifying how to
teach these contents on one hand and how to make the teaching materials more
responsive to the learners' subjective and objective needs on the other hand.
85
3.6.4 Strategy Analysis
As its name indicates, this type of NA deals with the strategies that learners
employ in order to learn a language. This approach tries to establish how the
learners wish to learn rather than what they need to learn, West (1998 cited in
Sanghori, 2008:12). The TSA and PSA, as one can notice easily, have not been
concerned with the learners' view of learning. In other words these approaches
pay attention more to 'what' to teach which is different aspect from 'how' to teach
and learn. Strategy analysis is concerned with the latter. Its main concern is
methodology ( Nunan,1988). However, related areas in strategy analysis are
preferences in group size, correction procedures and methods of assessment
(Jordan, 1997:27). To establish such needs, AUwright (1982) who is the pioneer
of this approach proposes the use of questionnaires, group discussions and
interviews. According to him investigation of learners' preferred learning styles
and strategies gives us a picture of the learners' conception of learning the
language and their priorities in learning it. It is AUwright who makes a
distinction between 'need', 'want' and 'lack'. He uses the word 'need' to mean the
language skills which are relevant to the learners; 'what' which the learner puts
on a high priority in the available and limited time; and 'lack' to refer to the gap
between the learners' current competence and the desired one. His ideas were
adopted later by Hutchinson and Water (1987). (Shujaa, 2004:82) points out that
recent research in learning strategies calls for the necessity of strategies teaching
and training. He quotes Peacock (2001) who nicely reviews some research
studies in the area of learning strategies and suggests that learning strategies can
be taught. After conducting a study on 140 students at City University, Hong
Kong, Peacock concludes that learning strategies need not be trained explicitly.
Rather, they could be embedded in teaching tasks and activities. Learning
strategies training can be helpful especially in ESP field where the available time
is limited in the classroom.
88
• Language information about leamers-what their current skills and
language uses are (present situation analysis);
• Learner's lacking (the gap between the present situation and professional
information about learners);
• Learner's needs from course-what is wanted from the course (short-term
needs);
• Language learning needs- effective ways of learning the skills and
language determined by shortcomings;
• Professional information about leamers-the tasks and activities English
learners are/will be using English for (target situation analysis and
objective needs);
• How to communicate in the target situation-knowledge of how language
and skills are used in the target situation.
Zughoul and Hussein (1985) as cited in Bin Taya'a (1996:18) conducted a large
scale investigation on the students' language needs at Yarmouk University,
Jordan. The study included six faculties involving Natural Sciences, Engineering,
Medicine, Economics, Administrative Sciences and Arts and Humanities. The
aim was to investigate three issues: the extent of using English language at the
university, perceptions of the students' language abilities and perceptions of
English language needs. This was done through distributing two questionnaires
on a sample group of 1147 students and 90 faculty members. The questionnaires
covered various dimensions of English language needs, including the importance
of the four language skills (listening, speaking, reading and writing) for the
students' academic study and frequency of using these skills. The findings
revealed the following:
On the whole, this study is in contrast with Al-Hakim's (1984) study discussed
above in that the findings of this study revealed that both students and their
teachers are in close agreement regarding perceiving the importance of English
skills, sub-skills and the priorities among them, whereas Al-Hakim's study lacked
such agreement.
The researcher then conducted interviews with the coordinator of the lab
instructors and the instructors themselves to obtain information about the goals
and requirements of the lab and their expectations regarding the learners and
their problems. Jacobson divided the data collected from the instrument into six
categories as follows:
92
Moreover, students and their teachers were allowed to freely express their
language needs and difficulties facing them. It was believed that unstructured
field work followed by interviews could help to overcome the biased perception
of outsider analysts.
The results revealed that critical reading was the key skill for the students'
academic studies in addition to report writing. Ramani and her colleagues came
to the conclusion that such an approach to NA can lead to more relevant ESP
programmes.
One of the early attempts to design a special purpose English language course
was that reported by Mackey (198:138-39) on a project to design ESP course for
undergraduates in the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production at
Mexico University. The project aimed at providing undergraduates, animal
scienfist and veterinarians with the variety of English language skills that would
be of most professional use during their studies.
93
study. The questionnaire which consisted of three versions was given to three
participants groups. It was divided into five sections including the following:
1. Personal details
2. English language skills and level of proficiency required for
graduates
3. Task to be performed using English
4. In-service training needs
5. General (e.g. the present proficiency of graduates)
It was reported that the need for both EAP and EOF course was unmistakably
indicated by the study. The findings indicated the subjects' needs for listening,
reading, writing and speaking respectively for both academic and occupational
purposes. Moreover, social English was needed within the KBI for
communication between the lectures and students.
94
letters, except 10 subjects who had some work experience. All were of the
opinion that the materials should reflect the actual kind of language used in
business writing in the local business community in Hong Kong.
95
1. Subject confirmed that both Ustening and writing skills were the most
troublesome skills to master at the macro and micro levels.
2. Speaking was considered the second least difficult skill, whilst reading
was perceived as the easiest skill to master.
3. Modals, verb sequencing, connectives and articles were identified as the
major problems sources.
96
particular communication needs. The researcher also collected samples of
authentic correspondence to be analyzed and conducted visits to the workplace in
order to obtain more understanding of the relevant issues. The findings could be
summarized as follows:
1. Extensive use of English
2. Extensive use of fax as the most common and preferred channel followed
by telephone
3. Three activities were ranked highly: following up on an order, advising
updated status and clarifying order queries.
4. There was a need to improve the learner's performance in specific areas
of language and communication work. These included consideration of
presentation, paragraphing, headings and numbering, abbreviations,
grammatical accuracy, tone, business jargon, connectives and sentence
completion.
Staba et al (2002:6-9) carried out a study to investigate the needs and
expectations of the Tourism and Management students with regard to the writing
course offered in three colleges in Malaysia. The study attempted to reveal
whether the courses offered reflected the specific writing needs for the workplace
in the hospitality industry. The subjects selected were 50 students from three
different institutions, all who had been studying several courses ranging from
general English to more specific ones (EOP), and had undergone their practical
training at several hotels in Malaysia. The significance of having these students
is that they came back to the institutions after completing the training and would
be able to identify and compare the writing skills needed to function well at their
workplace (Stapa et al, 2002:6). The only instrument used for this study was a set
of questionnaires designed to gather information about the students' needs and
expectations, and to find out the gap of the students' needs to match with the
workplace. The questionnaire consisted of three sections:
• Personal details;
• English writing needs;
• Current writing program at the three selected higher learning institutions.
97
The most important findings were:
1. Students were not satisfied with the syllabus offered at colleges because it
focused on grammar and not related to workplace functions.
2. There was a mismatch of what writing courses offered at the institutions
with real needs of writing in tourism and hotel industries.
3. Students identified report writing, formal letters, memo, summary, and
notices as the most needed writing skills.
Kaur and Hua (2004:9) studied the workplace oral communication needs of
Information Technology (IT) graduates as received by IT employees in order to
identify the forms and skills of oral communication in English frequently used by
IT graduates. Effective oral communication is vital for IT graduates as it is a
significant challenge they face in their day-to-day job, where they are expected to
perform various communicative events, Dickson et al (2001 cited in Kaur and
Hua (2004:1). The aim of the study was to find out about the nature of oral
workplace communication for IT graduate employees from the manufacturing
sector in Penang's Free Industrial Zone, Malaysia. The instruments of the study
were a survey questionnaire and semi-structured interview. Two sets of
questionnaires were used at the beginning of the study. The first was distributed
to 69 employees and the second to II employers. Then interviews were
conducted with 4 managers at their workplace. The required information was
related to importance, skills and frequency of oral communication used by IT
graduates on job as well as the people they worked with, and forms of this
communication. The findings revealed the following:
The three most frequently used forms of workplace oral communication were:
• Social interaction;
• Participation in meetings;
• Telephone conversation;
There was a 'skill gap' between the IT graduates' actual oral communication
performance in English and the IT employers' expectations.
98
A study by Shaaban (2005:2) was carried out to study English language skills
most needed by employees in the American University of Beirut, Lebanon, who
were increasingly coming in contact with English-Speaking faculty, employees
and the guests of the University. The study aimed to help the programme
administrators in the University to identify the objective communicative needs of
the employees. The subjects who participated in this study were personnel
officers, supervisors, and a sample of the employees themselves included:
janitors, gardeners, security guards, library staff, and Comptroller's Office staff.
The needs analysis survey conducted was a combination of the target situation
analysis and present situation analysis. The first step was to find out about the
employees' background of learning English. The next step was conducting
interviews with the mentioned subjects. The findings were:
100
consisting of field observations and interviews, as well as a survey in
representative EOP institutions. Three months of field work was conducted in an
EOP program provided for a group of EOP learners from the human resource
development department of a major corporation. The study also utilized a survey
conducted in seven locafions in order to complement the case study. The major
findings were:
101
• To make some general recommendations for improving the EAP program
in the light of the findings of the intended needs analysis.
For the data gathering, she adopted both quantitative and qualitative
techniques through three different research tools (questionnaire, observation
and interview). The questionnaire consisted of 43 items that covered skills
and sub-skills of reading, writing, speaking, listening and future needs. Two
identical questionnaires were used, one for the teachers (31 subject teachers
and 5 English teachers), the other for the students (317). As for the interview,
two versions of an interview were conducted with 60 students and 22 subject
teachers, covering the importance of English in the faculty, the actual use of
English, difficulties, etc. Besides the questionnaires and interviews, 26
lectures and practicals from the 3rd and 4th years were also observed. The
findings revealed the following:
1. Reading was the most needed skill followed by writing while speaking
and listening were perceived to be less important.
2. There was general dissatisfaction regarding the achieving of the English
needs in EAP course offered to the students.
3. There were no significant differences in the perception of the importance
of English among the departments of the college.
4. Two kinds of needs should be taken into account: short-term related to the
students' field of study and long-term related to general communication
purposes.
Abdullah (2005:187) investigated the needs of ESP learners for practical English
communication with reference to the first year students at the Faculty of
Medicine, University of Aden. The study tried to achieve the following aims:
102
• To investigate the needs of the learners for practical English
communication from the point of view of the teaching staff.
The researcher used two instruments (questionnaire and interview). The
questionnaire which consisted of 22 items was administered to 100 students;
whereas the structured interview consisted of 4 parameters including 22 items
was conducted with teachers (10) who were actually involved in the teaching of
the concerned students. The major aims of these instruments included:
Hassan (2008: 111-113) tried to investigate the students' English language needs
at the Industrial and Technical Institute, Aden city. The study endeavored to:
103
The subject of the study included students, subject's teachers, EngUsh teachers
and ELT experts. The researcher used different instruments and different samples
as follows:
The instruments of the study were used to collect information about a number of
issues which are related to the study. These included:
A study by Ali (200:86) was carried out to study the communicative use of
English by a group of employees in the National Water and Sanitation Authority
(NWSA). The aim of the study was to explore the various problems, which the
NWSA employees face in their communication with foreign experts i.e.
contractors, suppliers, consultants and representative of the International
Organizations during their site visits, meetings and correspondences with
104
NWSA. The subjects of the study included 20 technicians, engineers and
administrative staff in NWSA. For gathering the required data, the researcher
used questionnaires, speaking, reading and writing tests (nothing mentioned
about listening). The questionnaires covered issues related to the subject's
background, their use of English in NWSA, their language needs, abilities and
difficulties. The tests focused on the language skills to assess their language
proficiency. All the subjects filled out the questionnaires and performed the tests.
The most important findings were:
1. The staff needs not only English for Airline Business but also English for
General Purposes that would enable them to have easy access to the airline
specialization literature, and to use the language communicative in and
outside the workplaces.
105
2. The researcher proposed a set of principles for designing a language
course divided into basic, intermediate, and advanced levels with a sample
lesson for each level.
3.4 Conclusion
The chapter consists of two sections. The first deals with the notion of "Needs
Analysis" (NA), which can be considered as the comer stone of the study. It
covers: definitions of NA, position of NA in ESP, types of NA, importance of
NA, famous approaches to NA and the modem concept of NA. The second
section focuses on studies incorporating actual needs analysis carried out in
different places in the world. In one way or another, these studies have relevance
to the present study.
106