Organizational Behavior: Definition, Importance, Nature, Model
Organizational Behavior: Definition, Importance, Nature, Model
Organizational Behavior: Definition, Importance, Nature, Model
Origin of Organisational Behaviour can trace its roots back to Max Weber
and earlier organizational studies.
The Industrial Revolution is the period from approximately 1760 when new
technologies resulted in the adoption of new manufacturing techniques,
including increased mechanization.
The industrial revolution led to significant social and cultural change,
including new forms of organization.
Analyzing these new organizational forms, sociologist Max Weber
described bureaucracy as an ideal type of organization that rested on
rational-legal principles and maximized technical efficiency.
In the 1890’s; with the arrival of scientific management and Taylorism,
Organizational Behavior Studies was forming it as an academic discipline.
Failure of scientific management gave birth to the human relations
movement which is characterized by a heavy emphasis on employee
cooperation and morale.
Human Relations Movement from the 1930’s to 1950’s contributed to
shaping the Organizational Behavior studies.
Works of scholars like Elton Mayo, Chester Barnard, Henri Fayol, Mary
Parker Follett, Frederick Herzberg, Abraham Mas low, David Mc Cellan and
Victor Vroom contributed to the growth of Organisational Behaviour as a
discipline.
Works of scholars like Elton Mayo, Chester Barnard, Henri Fayol, Mary
Parker Follett, Frederick Herzberg, Abraham Maslow, David Mc Cellan and
Victor Vroom contributed to the growth of Organisational Behaviour as a
discipline.
Herbert Simon’s Administrative Behavior introduced a number of important
concepts to the study of organizational behavior, most notably decision
making.
Simon along with Chester Barnard; argued that people make decisions
differently in organizations than outside of them. Simon was awarded the
Nobel Prize in Economics for his work on organizational decision making.
In the 1960s and 1970s, the field became more quantitative and produced
such ideas as the informal organization, and resource dependence.
Contingency theory, institutional theory, and organizational ecology also
enraged.
Starting in the 1980s, cultural explanations of organizations and
organizational change became areas of study.
Informed by anthropology, psychology, and sociology, qualitative research
became more acceptable in OB.
Organizational Behavior Definition
What is OB?
“Organizational behavior is directly concerned with the understanding,
prediction, and control of human behavior in organizations.” — Fred
Luthans.
1. Job Satisfaction.
2. Finding the Right People.
3. Organizational Culture.
4. Leadership and Conflict Resolution.
5. Understanding the Employees Better.
6. Understand how to Develop Good Leaders.
7. Develop a Good Team.
8. Higher Productivity.
Individual Differences.
Perception.
A whole Person.
Motivated Behavior.
The desire for Involvement.
The value of the Person.
Human Dignity.
Organizations are Social System.
Mutuality of Interest.
Holistic Concept.
Behavioral Bias.
The Law of Diminishing Returns.
Unethical Manipulation of People.
People.
Structure.
Technology.
Environment.
Psychology.
Sociology.
Social Psychology.
Anthropology.
Political Sciences.
Economics.
1. Intellectual Ability.
2. Physical Ability.
Intellectual Ability
Intellectual ability is the capacity to do mental activities – thinking and
reasoning and problem-solving.
It commonly refers to the ability measured by performance on an
intelligence test. It is also sometimes used in the context of discussing the
performance of someone in an academic or real-world setting.
The seven most frequently cited dimensions making up intellectual abilities
are number attitude, verbal comprehension, perceptual speed, inductive
reasoning, deductive reasoning, and memory.
Intellectual abilities have got seven dimensions.
Such as;
Dimension Description
It is the ability to understand what is read and heard and the relationship
Comprehension
of words to each other.
It is a dying ability to identify visual similarities and differences quickly
Perceptual Speed
and accurately.
Deductive Reasoning It is the ability to see logic and assesses the implication of art argument.
It is the ability to imagine how an object would look like its position in
Special Visualization
space was changed.
Advantages
Highly reliable
Verbal reasoning and numerical tests have shown high validity for a wide
range of jobs.
The validity rises with an increasing complexity of the job.
Combinations of aptitude tests have higher validities than individual tests
alone.
May be administered in group settings where many applicants can be
tested at the same time.
Scoring of the tests may be completed by computer scanning equipment.
Lower cost than personality tests.
Physical Ability
Physical ability is the capacity to do tasks that demand stamina, desired,
strength and similar characteristics.
It can identify individuals who are physically able to perform the essentials
function of a job without risking injury to others.
Research on the requirements needed in hundreds’ of jobs has identified
nine physical abilities involved in the performance of physical tasks.
These are -dynamic strength, static strength, trunk strength, explosive
strength, extent flexibility, dynamic flexibility, body – coordination, balance,
and stamina.
Factor Description
Extent Flexibility Ability to move the trunk and back muscles as far as possible.
Advantages
Disadvantages
Costly to administer
Requirements must be shown to be job-related through a thorough job
analysis.
May have an age-based disparate impact against older applicants,
Intellectual Ability vs. Physical Ability
Ability is an individual’s capacity to master numerous tasks in a job.
Organizations need to identify key abilities of employees that will lead to
success, and employees need to have certain abilities that will make them
a valuable addition to an organization.
The person who has both the intellectual ability and physical ability may
become a rising star within the organization.
Intellectual ability deals with mental capabilities such as excellent memory,
verbal comprehension, reasoning, analyzing, and problem-solving, which
are all important elements of worker skill in companies.
Physical ability is the ability to perform some physical act, including the
tasks that require characteristics such as strength, stamina, etc.
For example, a word processor is required to use his/her fingers to type on
the keyboard to accomplish the job. There are significant differences
between these abilities.
These are given below:
Intellectual Ability Physical Ability
1. Intellectual ability is the capacity to do the 1. Physical ability is the capacity to do tasks that
activities like thinking, reasoning, and demand stamina, desired, strength and similar
problem-solving. characteristics.
2. Intellectual ability is doing with the mind. 2. Physical ability is doing with the body.
8. Types of intellectual ability are number 8. Types of physical ability are a dynamic strength,
attitude, verbal comprehension, perceptual static strength, trunk strength, explosive strength,
speed, inductive reasoning, deductive extent flexibility, dynamic flexibility, body
reasoning, and memory. coordination, balance, and stamina.
1. Cognitive Component.
2. Affective Component.
3. Behavioral Component.
Social Factors.
Direct Instruction.
Family.
Prejudices.
Personal Experience.
Media.
Educational and Religious Institutions.
Physical Factors.
Economic Status and Occupations.
Types of Attitudes
1. Job Satisfaction,
2. Job Involvement, and
3. Organizational Commitment.
Functions of Attitudes
The most important function of an attitude can only be ascertained by
considering it in relation to the person who holds it and the environment in
which they operate.
Daniel Katz outlines four functions of attitude areas:
1. Adjustment Function.
2. Ego-Defensive Function.
3. Value-Expressive Function.
4. Knowledge Function.
Prior Commitment.
Insufficient Information.
Balance and Consistency.
Lack of Resources.
Improper Reward System.
Resistance to Change.
Prior Commitment
When people feel a commitment towards a particular course of action that
has already been agreed upon and thus it becomes difficult for them to
change or accept the new ways of functioning.
Insufficient Information
It also acts as a major barrier to change attitudes. Sometimes people do
not see a reason why they should change their attitude due to unavailability
of adequate information.
Sometimes people do not see a reason why they should change their
attitude due to unavailability of adequate information.
Balance and Consistency
Another obstacle to a change of attitude is the attitude theory of balance
and consistency. That is human beings prefer their attitudes about people
and things to be in line with their behaviors towards each other and objects.
Lack of Resources
If plans become excessively ambitious, they can sometimes be obstructed
by the lack of resources on the part of a company or organization.
So, in this case, if the organization wants to change the attitude of the
employees towards the new plan, sometimes it becomes impossible for the
lack of resources to achieve this.
Improper Reward System
Sometimes, an improper reward system acts as a barrier to change
attitude.
If an organization places too much emphasis on short-term performance
and results, managers may ignore longer-term issues as they set goals and
formulate plans to achieve higher profits in the short term.
If this reward system is introduced in the organization, then the employees
are not motivated to change their attitude.
Resistance to Change
Another barrier is resistance to change.
Basically, change is a continuous process within and outside the
organization to achieve the set goal.
When the authority changes a plan of the organization the employees have
to change themselves.
But some of them do not like this. If their attitude regarding the change of
plan cannot be changed, the organization will not be successful.
Ways of Changing Attitudes
Taking this a step further, we can assemble some ideas of how these three
components can impact the workplace.
The challenge in the workplace is that now these components are tied to
work functions, policy, procedures and organizational structure, as well as
the people and individuals present in the organization.
For example, we could have thoughts or beliefs (cognitive) about managers
in general, and those thoughts or beliefs could manifest themselves is not
trusting a manager (effective), and thus we would never want to develop a
close relationship with a manager (behavioral).
It is important to make the point here that these are attitudes – and yes,
they can be wrong. Just because we have an attitude that does not mean
it is correct. It is just how we feel about a person or situation.
Obviously not every manager is trustworthy, but if we let our
negative attitudes dictate how we view and react to managers, we will
never be able to see if some are really good people and can be trusted.
Certainly having a good relationship based on trust with the manager is a
great thing to have in the workplace.