Spherical Waves: 1 The Helmholtz Wave Equation in Spherical Coordinates
Spherical Waves: 1 The Helmholtz Wave Equation in Spherical Coordinates
Spherical Waves: 1 The Helmholtz Wave Equation in Spherical Coordinates
Spherical Waves
1 The Helmholtz Wave Equation in Spherical Coordinates
In the previous section we reviewed the solution to the homogeneous wave (Helmholtz) equation
in Cartesian coordinates, which yielded plane wave solutions. An equally important solution to
the wave equation which we will encounter many times in this course in the spherical wave, which
is solved by considering the Helmholtz equation written in spherical coordinates. This is a much
more advanced topic, but we will try to elucidate the key form of the solution here. Later in
the course, we will study particular solutions to the spherical wave equation, when we solve the
nonhomogeneous version of the wave equation.
Let’s rewrite the wave equation here as a reminder,
∇2 ψ + k 2 ψ = 0. (1)
For the time being, we consider the wave equation in terms of a scalar quantity ψ, rather than a
vector field E or H as we did before. The reason is that a vector solution will be more appropriate
when we study the solution to the nonhomogenous wave equation; here we only try to get a sense
of what the solutions will look like by studying the scalar homogeneous equation.
We now expand the Laplacian operator in spherical coordinates, which is found in any electro-
magnetics textbook,
∂ 2ψ
1 ∂ 2 ∂ψ 1 ∂ ∂ψ 1
r + sin θ + + k 2 ψ = 0. (2)
r2 ∂r ∂r r2 sin θ ∂θ ∂θ r2 sin2 θ ∂φ2
It can be quite challenging to solve this equation because there are three spatial variables, r, θ,
and φ.
3 General Solution
While beyond the scope of this course, you may wonder what happens if we relax the assumption
of radial symmetry in the solution, i.e. (3) no longer holds. Then, we must solve the entire wave
equation, repeated here as
∂ 2ψ
1 ∂ 2 ∂ψ 1 ∂ ∂ψ 1
2
r + 2 sin θ + 2 2 2
+ k 2 ψ = 0. (15)
r ∂r ∂r r sin θ ∂θ ∂θ r sin θ ∂φ
To make the solution easier, we invoke the separation of variables method and let the solution be
given by
ψ = R(r)Θ(θ)Φ(φ). (16)
Substituting this into (15) gives
RΘ d2 Φ
ΦΘ d 2 dR RΦ d dΘ
r + sin θ + + k 2 RΘΦ = 0. (17)
r2 dr dr r2 sin θ dθ dθ r2 sin2 θ dφ2
Dividing by RΘΦ and multiplying by r2 sin2 θ gives
sin2 θ d 1 d2 Φ
2 dR sin θ d dΘ
r + sin θ + + k 2 r2 sin2 θ = 0. (18)
R dr dr Θ dθ dθ Φ dφ2
With the φ dependence separated out, we let the separation constant be set so that
1 d2 Φ
= −m2 . (19)
Φ dφ2
Subsituting this into the wave equation, and dividing by sin2 θ,
m2
1 d 2 dR 1 d dΘ
r + sin θ − 2 + k 2 r2 = 0. (20)
R dr dr Θ sin θ dθ dθ sin θ
Now we see the r and θ dependence have been properly separated. For the next separation
constant, we make the seemingly odd choice of separation constant n such that
m2
1 d dΘ
sin θ − = −n(n + 1). (21)
Θ sin θ dθ dθ sin2 θ
With this choice, the wave equation becomes
1 d 2 dR
r − n(n + 1) + k 2 r2 = 0, (22)
R dr dr
which completes the separation of variables. We have now formed a set of separated equations
d 2 dR
r + [(kr)2 − n(n + 1)]R = 0 (23)
dr dr
m2
1 d dΘ
sin θ + n(n + 1) + Θ = 0 (24)
sin θ dθ dθ sin2 θ
d2 Φ
2
+ m2 Φ = 0. (25)
dφ
Prof. Sean Victor Hum ECE422: Radio and Microwave Wireless Systems
Spherical Waves Page 4
We have already solved the first equation, which is the spherical Bessel equation. The last equation
is familiar to us, and we know it solutions are of the form
The solution to the second equation is actually known as a Legendre function given by Lm
n (cos θ).
This is an advanced topic and not treated here.
According to (16), the solution to the wave equation is actually a product of all the three solutions
presented here. That is,
e−jkr m
ψ=− L (cos θ)e±jmφ (27)
jkr n
This is the general solution to the homogenous wave equation in spherical coordinates.
Prof. Sean Victor Hum ECE422: Radio and Microwave Wireless Systems