Scribd
Upload
40 views6 pages

Metode Analisis Perencanaan I (MAP I) : Fika Febi Novianti (2018280030)

The document analyzes cluster analysis of 12 cases using 5 variables: income, grants, population, loans, and consumption. It performs a quick cluster analysis which groups the cases into 3 clusters based on standardized z-scores. ANOVA shows the clusters are statistically significant for all variables. A hierarchical cluster analysis with average linkage further supports 3 clusters as the best structure.

Uploaded by

fika febi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
40 views6 pages

Metode Analisis Perencanaan I (MAP I) : Fika Febi Novianti (2018280030)

The document analyzes cluster analysis of 12 cases using 5 variables: income, grants, population, loans, and consumption. It performs a quick cluster analysis which groups the cases into 3 clusters based on standardized z-scores. ANOVA shows the clusters are statistically significant for all variables. A hierarchical cluster analysis with average linkage further supports 3 clusters as the best structure.

Uploaded by

fika febi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Metode Analisis Perencanaan I (MAP I)

Analisis CLUSTER

Disusun oleh:

Fika Febi Novianti


(2018280030)

Dosen pengampu:
Zenal Mutaqin S.T, M.Si

FAKULTAS TEKNIK
PROGRAM STUDI PERENCANAAN WILAYAH DAN KOTA
UNIVERSITAS INDO GLOBAL MANDIRI
TAHUN AJARAN 2019/2020
Descriptives

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Pendapatan 12 60.00 93.00 76.3333 10.62016

Pinjaman 12 40.00 89.00 69.7500 14.37248

dana_hibah 12 6.00 9.00 7.4167 1.16450

Konsumsi 12 53.00 90.00 75.2500 11.79464

Penduduk 12 24.00 67.00 44.9167 13.89217

Valid N (listwise) 12

Quick Cluster

Initial Cluster Centers

Cluster

1 2 3

Zscore(pendapatan) 1.28686 -.50219 -.59635

Zscore(dana_hibah) 1.35967 -1.21654 -.35781

Zscore(penduduk) 1.22971 -1.07375 -.85780

Zscore(pinjaman) .71317 .36528 -2.06993

Zscore(konsumsi) .74186 .91143 -1.29296

Iteration Historya

Change in Cluster Centers

Iteration 1 2 3

1 .892 1.172 1.092

2 .000 .000 .000

a. Convergence achieved due to no or small


change in cluster centers. The maximum
absolute coordinate change for any center is
,000. The current iteration is 2. The minimum
distance between initial centers is 3,403.
Final Cluster Centers

Cluster

1 2 3

Zscore(pendapatan) 1.09854 -.29504 -.97299

Zscore(dana_hibah) .50093 -.52955 .21468

Zscore(penduduk) 1.08574 -.49788 -.61785

Zscore(pinjaman) .74796 .15655 -1.25819

Zscore(konsumsi) .76306 .21620 -1.37774

ANOVA

Cluster Error

Mean Square df Mean Square df F Sig.

Zscore(pendapatan) 4.051 2 .322 9 12.584 .002

Zscore(dana_hibah) 1.272 2 .940 9 1.354 .306

Zscore(penduduk) 3.550 2 .433 9 8.192 .009

Zscore(pinjaman) 3.555 2 .432 9 8.223 .009

Zscore(konsumsi) 4.129 2 .305 9 13.548 .002

The F tests should be used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to
maximize the differences among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are not
corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster means are equal.

Number of Cases in each


Cluster

Cluster 1 4.000

2 5.000

3 3.000

Valid 12.000

Missing .000
Proximities

Case Processing Summarya

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

12 100.0% 0 .0% 12 100.0%

a. Squared Euclidean Distance used

Cluster

Average Linkage (Between Groups)

Agglomeration Schedule

Cluster Combined Stage Cluster First Appears

Stage Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Coefficients Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Next Stage

1 9 10 .959 0 0 6

2 7 11 .974 0 0 6

3 4 5 2.188 0 0 5

4 6 8 3.288 0 0 7

5 3 4 4.038 0 3 9

6 7 9 4.152 2 1 8

7 2 6 4.250 0 4 9

8 7 12 6.891 6 0 11

9 2 3 7.159 7 5 10

10 1 2 10.490 0 9 11

11 1 7 13.270 10 8 0
Cluster Membership

Case 4 Clusters 3 Clusters 2 Clusters

1:A 1 1 1

2:B 2 2 1

3:C 3 2 1

4:D 3 2 1

5:E 3 2 1

6:F 2 2 1

7:G 4 3 2

8:H 2 2 1

9:I 4 3 2

10:J 4 3 2

11:K 4 3 2

12:L 4 3 2

Dendrogram
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * H I E R A R C H I C A L C L U S T E R A N
A L Y S I S * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups)

Rescaled Distance Cluster Combine

C A S E 0 5 10 15 20 25
Label Num +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+

I 9 ─┬───────────┐
J 10 ─┘ ├───────────┐
G 7 ─┬───────────┘ ├───────────────────────┐
K 11 ─┘ │ │
L 12 ─────────────────────────┘ │
D 4 ─────┬───────┐ │
E 5 ─────┘ ├───────────┐ │
C 3 ─────────────┘ ├─────────────┐ │
F 6 ─────────┬───┐ │ │ │
H 8 ─────────┘ ├───────────┘ ├─────────┘
B 2 ─────────────┘ │

A 1 ───────────────────────────────────────┘

You might also like