IEMTCModule1 Final PDF
IEMTCModule1 Final PDF
Module 1 provides a context for industrial energy management in South Africa in terms of
market conditions, energy supply issues, government regulations and initiatives, and
international practice pertaining to energy efficiency and the concomitant environmental
impact concerns. It develops a practical approach to effective energy management by
highlighting the multidimensional nature of this organisational function.
Many definitions have been offered for “energy management”. One definition that
captures the key principles is as follows:
Among the practices that arise from this definition are the following:
♦ ELIMINATE WASTE: Ensure that energy is used at the highest possible
efficiency.
♦ MAXIMISE EFFICIENCY: Utilise the most appropriate technology—from a
business case perspective—to meet organisational needs.
♦ OPTIMISE SUPPLY: Purchase or supply energy at the lowest possible
cost.
Energy management takes many different forms. It may vary from simple
maintenance and operational activities that ensure equipment and systems use
energy efficiently and effectively, to capital intensive installation of new, more efficient
technology. It may involve “fuel switching” to energy sources that are inherently more
economical for a given application.
Because of heavy reliance on coal for both power generation and industrial
energy, South Africa’s CO2 emissions per unit of GDP are among the highest
in the world. Although South Africa is not required to meet CO2 emission
reduction targets during the initial commitment period for the Kyoto Protocol,
it can benefit from sale of certified emissions reduction (CER) credits sold to
The Industrial Sector in South Africa has a relatively high demand for energy, and
accounts for over 45 to 50% of the total final energy demand in the country. This
sectoral consumption is dominated by a few energy-intensive sub-sectors in which
energy intensity is typically higher than that found in 1st world countries.
Thus, it is envisaged that potential exists for energy savings in the sector by replacing
old technologies with relatively new ones and by employing best energy management
practices.
To identify and implement cost-effective efficiency interventions within this sector, the
draft National Energy Efficiency Strategy—for which final publication was imminent in
early 2005—makes provision for the use of Energy Management within the industrial
sector. The Strategy addresses all economic sectors in setting broad sustainability
goals, sectoral objectives and targets, and provides for the development of sectoral
action plans.
The approach incorporated into the Strategy combines voluntary action—in pursuit of
energy management best practice—and mandatory measures—efficiency standards
for selected technologies, requirements for energy audits, and requirements for
implementation of measures based on audit findings.
Actions that are being taken to achieve the industry sector objectives include:
• The development of a programme of support for industry energy training
• The establishment of a “Corporate Commitment” programme
• Encouragement of and support for energy management demonstration projects
• Implementation of energy monitoring and targeting.
South Africa’s primary energy supply is dominated by coal, which is plentiful and
relatively inexpensive by international standards. In 2000, the total primary energy
supply was approximately 4,782 PJ. Liquid fuel requirements in South Africa are
imported as crude oil, whilst synthetic fuel produced by Sasol accounts for
approximately 30% of the former. All the current natural gas produced at the PetroSA
offshore rig in the Bredasdorp Basin is converted into liquid fuels, supplying 8% of
national liquid fuel requirements.
Natural gas was delivered to South Africa from Mozambique in the first quarter of
2004 and is expected to reach a capacity of 120 MGJ per year in 2008.
South Africa has a mix of electricity generation power plants that use coal, hydro, gas
and nuclear energy as sources of power. In 2003, Eskom – the national electricity
utility – generated over 210 TWh of electricity with a net capacity of 36, 208 MW.
With the excess power capacity of South Africa expected to run out in about 2007,
Eskom is considering several additional power generation scenarios, including
revamping its mothballed power stations.
1 What are your top three operating expenses? For many organisations, the
answer to that question includes energy (electricity, coal and fuel), labour and
materials expenses.
3 What priority should energy management receive? On the basis of the amount
spent, energy often ranks third on the list behind labour and materials. However, if
we rank these cost centres in terms of the potential for savings, many companies find
that energy moves to the first priority position. In fact, in this illustration, energy
management would deliver about twice the savings
that materials management would and five times Energy is a manageable
what labour cost management offers. expense — perhaps your
most manageable
expense!
250 5%
200
(R 1,000's)
150 25%
10%
100
50
0
Energy Labour Materials
O
indicates that technological solutions alone
rg
al
a
do not achieve maximum energy savings,
ni
nic
za
and are less likely to be sustained in the
!
t io
ch
long term. Rather, energy management has
na
Te
l
address these three dimensions:
There are cases to demonstrate that a focus on people alone—their awareness of energy
efficiency as corporate priority, their values and attitudes towards energy use, and their skills
and knowledge related to the management and use of energy systems—can achieve
significant and sustainable savings. The combination of these two approaches—
technological and human resources—typically yields the best result.
Many cases can be found to demonstrate the wisdom of addressing the three dimensions of
energy management listed above. One such case follows.
The British chemical company, ChiRex Ltd. (Good Practice Case Study 331: Energy
Management Within a Strategic Framework) achieved savings in its production energy
and water consumption equal to over 9% of the existing energy and utilities budget,
£212,300 (or about US$350,000) per year at 1994 rates through a variety of measures that
included the following:
♦ Senior management support and leadership expressed through a policy of
minimizing energy and utility costs;
♦ Creating an organizational structure to support energy management activities, using
an “energy account center” approach for the production units;
♦ Setting up Energy Teams in each production unit comprised of engineering,
maintenance and production personnel;
♦ Communicating on energy efficiency activities and progress by means of regular
performance reports, energy notice boards to build broad awareness throughout the
organization, publicity activities focused on quarterly energy performance reviews, and
suggestion schemes open to all company personnel;
♦ Monitoring and Targeting to effectively collect, analyze and manage energy
information
(Note: this case study and many other publications on good practices in energy
management can be downloaded—in English only—from the UK Best Practice Program at
http://www.thecarbontrust.co.uk/energy/pages/home.asp).
This course focuses on the management side of the issue. It does address the technical dimension
by means of an energy assessment methodology. However, it does not deal with the technological
questions—what it is about technology that makes it efficient or inefficient, how maintenance impacts
efficiency, and so on; we leave these questions for other training courses.
♦ energy policy—the role that it plays, and how to develop a good one (Module 4)