100% found this document useful (1 vote)
150 views23 pages

EGR vs. SCR:: Presents

This document compares and contrasts exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technologies for meeting 2010 emissions regulations for diesel trucks. It outlines key differences between the technologies in terms of fuel economy, heat rejection, power density, reliability, weight, service intervals, particulate filter regenerations, and fan-on time. It also provides cost comparisons over a 4-year period factoring in fuel usage and diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) costs. Additionally, it explains how SCR systems work and DEF distribution. The document aims to dispel myths about SCR and argues it provides improved fuel economy, increased reliability, better drivability, and fewer emissions compared to EGR.

Uploaded by

Dagar GR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
150 views23 pages

EGR vs. SCR:: Presents

This document compares and contrasts exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technologies for meeting 2010 emissions regulations for diesel trucks. It outlines key differences between the technologies in terms of fuel economy, heat rejection, power density, reliability, weight, service intervals, particulate filter regenerations, and fan-on time. It also provides cost comparisons over a 4-year period factoring in fuel usage and diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) costs. Additionally, it explains how SCR systems work and DEF distribution. The document aims to dispel myths about SCR and argues it provides improved fuel economy, increased reliability, better drivability, and fewer emissions compared to EGR.

Uploaded by

Dagar GR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23

Presents:

EGR vs. SCR:


What You Need to Know.
2010 Emissions Regulations
1998
2002
0.10
0.09
0.08
PM (g/hp-hr)

0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01 10 2007
0.00
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
NOx (g/hp-hr)
2010 Emissions Solutions
Engine Brand EPA 2007 EPA 2010
PACCAR EGR SCR
Detroit Diesel EGR SCR
Volvo EGR SCR
Mack EGR SCR
Cummins EGR SCR
International EGR EGR
Caterpillar EGR (CGI) Exiting Market
2010 Emissions Technology
SCR EGR
Fuel Economy 3-5% Gain 5-9% Loss

Heat Rejection Reduced 20-30% Increase

Power Density Increased 50-100 HP Loss

Reliability Increased Excessive Acidic Condensation

Weight 250-500 Lbs 75-100 Lbs

Service Intervals Same Same

DPF Regenerations Fewer Higher

Fan-On Time Reduced Increased


2010 Cost Impact
2007 vs 2010 Solutions*
Emissions Level ’07 EGR SCR SCR vs EGR

MPG 6.5 6.37 6.83 5-10%


Gallons Fuel 76,900 78,500 73,200
Fuel Δ - 1,600 (3,700) 5,300
Cost Fuel ($2.80/gal) $215,400 $219,800 $205,100
Cost Δ - $4,400 $(10,300) $14,700
Gallons DEF (2% Usage) - - 1,500
Cost DEF ($2.79/gal) $4,000 $(4,000)
Initial Cost + FET - $9,750 $11,300 $(1,550)
Total Cost Impact (4 Years) - $14,150 $5,000 $9,150
*125,000 Miles Annually
4 Year Cycle
Cummins
ISX11.9 PACCAR MX 12.9L Cummins
ISX15
Peterbilt Offerings (All SCR)

Cummins
PACCAR PX-6 ISL9
ISL G
PACCAR PX-8
How SCR Works
Dosing Unit DEF Tank

Diesel Particulate

SCR Catalyst
Diesel Exhaust Fluid System Components
SCR Catalyst Coolant Lines

Urea Dosing Pump

Urea Lines

Air Lines
Front Partial

Fill Neck

DPF Urea Tank Sending Unit

Mixing Pipe

Rear Partial Urea Injector Air Compressor


“Crossover”

Under Cab

Vertical
About Diesel Exhaust Fluid
• Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF)
– 32.5% Urea
– 67.5% Distilled Water
– Non-toxic
– Freezes at ~12o
• Targeted Locations
– Truck Stop Chains
– Truck Dealerships
– Fleets
• Bulk Distribution
– 55 Gallon Drums
– 275+ Gallon IBC
– 1,000 Gallon Tanks
• Initial Retail Pricing
– $2.79/Gallon
Usable Max Fuel
Configuration Width
Capacity Capacity
mm Inches Gallons Gallons
Small 265 10.4 9 150
D-Shape Medium 480 18.9 18 300
Large 690 27.1 27 450
Medium Duty 250 9.8 6.6 110
Rectangular
Model 320 210 8.2 6 100

D-Shape Medium Duty Model 320


SCR Myth SCR Fact
DEF (Urea) will cost over $12/gallon The Current Average Price of DEF is $2.78/gallon

DEF will be hard to find DEF is already widely available across the
nation with new outlets added daily.

SCR Technology Will Add Too Much Weight The net increase over International’s EGR
solution will be less than 150lbs.

DEF is an Unsafe Substance While it may not taste very good, DEF is safe
enough to drink.
SCR isn’t a “Green” Solution SCR Engines will be the cleanest burning
engines ever placed in a truck and will use 5%
less fuel than International’s EGR Engine.
The Bottom Line
______________________________

Improved Fuel Economy

Increased Reliability

Drivability – Bigger Sweet Spot

Less Particulates Going To Filter

Better Driver Response

Fewer Active Regenerations


The marketing folks at International will tell you
their 2010 solution is “No Hassle”, and “All About
Taking the Burden Off The Customer”

Why don’t we take a look and let


you draw your own conclusions?
2 engine
mounted
Water to Air
intercoolers

And 2
turbochargers
Find the engine!
Does anything about
this engine say
“No Hassle” to you?
Now lets take a look at the
2010 Cummins ISX offering.
SCR is cleaner,
more efficient,
and easier to work on.
And we’ll prove it to you.
__________________________________________________________________________________

The Driving is Believing Tour


Presented by:

Coming February 2010

You might also like