Lord How To Critique Article
Lord How To Critique Article
book, journal article, or essay. No matter what your major is, you will probably be expected to
write a critique paper at some point. For psychology students, critiquing a professional paper is a
great way to learn more about psychology articles, writing, and the research process itself.
Students can analyze how researchers conduct experiments, interpret results and discuss the
impact of the results.
The first step should always be to do a thorough read-through of the material you will be
analyzing and critiquing. More than just a casual skim, however, your reading needs to be in-
depth with an eye toward certain elements.
Following these steps can help you make better sense of the material as you assess what you are
reading.
Is the hypothesis clearly stated? Is necessary background information and previous research
described in the introduction? In addition to answering these basic questions, you should take
note of information provided in the introduction and any questions that you may have.
Is the study procedure clearly outlined in the methods section? Can you determine
which variables the researchers are measuring? Remember to jot down questions and thoughts
that come to mind as you are reading. Once you have finished reading the paper, you can then
refer back to your initial questions and see which once remain unanswered.
Are all tables and graphs clearly labeled in the results section? Do researchers provide enough
statistical information? Did the researchers collect all of the data needed to measure the variables
in question? Again, make note of any questions you have or any information that does not seem
to make sense. You can refer back to these questions later as you are writing your final critique.
How do the researchers interpret the results of the study? Did the results support their
hypothesis? Do the conclusions drawn by the researchers seem reasonable? The discussion
section offers students a good opportunity to take a position.
If you agree with the researchers conclusions, explain why. If you feel that the researchers are
incorrect or off-base, point out problems with the conclusions and suggest alternative
explanations. Another alternative is to point out questions that the researchers failed to answer in
the discussion section.
1. Introduction
Begin your paper by describing the journal article and authors you are critiquing. Provide the
main hypothesis or thesis of the paper and explain why you think the information is relevant.
2. Thesis Statement
The final part of your introduction should include your thesis statement. Your thesis statement is
the main idea of your critique. Your thesis should briefly sum up the main points of your
critique.
3. Article Summary
Provide a brief summary of the article, outlining the main points, results and discussion. Be
careful not to get too bogged down by your summary. Remember, this section of your paper
should highlight the main points of the article you are critiquing. Don't feel obligated to
summarize each little detail of the main paper. Focus instead on giving the reader an overall idea
of the content of the article.
3. Your Analysis
In this section, you should provide your critique of the article. Describe any problems you had
with the authors premise, methods, or conclusions. Your critique might focus on problems with
the authors argument, presentation or on information, and alternatives that have been overlooked.
Organize your paper carefully and be careful not to jump around from one argument to the next.
Argue one point at a time. Doing this will ensure that your paper flow's well and is easy to read.
4. Conclusion
Your critique paper should end with an overview of the articles argument, your conclusions and
your reactions.