Block 1 MS 015 Unit 1
Block 1 MS 015 Unit 1
Structure
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction: What is Communication?
1.2 The Process of Communication
1.3 Barriers to Communication
1.4 Different Types of Communication
1.5 Written vs. Oral Communication
1.6 Different Types of Face-to-Face Interactions
1.7 Characteristics and Conventions of Conversation
1.8 Conversational Problems of Second/Foreign Language Users
1.9 Difference between Conversation and Other Speech Events
1.10 Summary
1.11 Suggested Readings
1.12 Answers to Check Your Progress
1.0 OBJECTIVES
In this unit we will introduce you to some basic concepts in communication, its importance in
business organizations, different types of communication, different modes to be used, and their
comparative advantages and disadvantages. We shall also give you insights into strategies that are
used for effective face-to-face communication.
We all engage in communication with others right from our birth. When we interact with others
we are communicating with them. Right now I am communicating with you through this unit and
while you are reading it you, too, are in fact communicating with me through this text.
It is often said that we live in an age of communication characterized by speed, efficiency, and
the ability to transcend physical or geographical limitations. But what does it mean to
communicate? The dictionary definition is ‘to exchange (thoughts) or make known (information
or feelings) by speech, writing or other means, to transmit’. Communication is more than just
messaging or swapping information. It involves not just words, but the use of all our senses.
With face-to-face dialogue, our facial expression, tone, body language, ability to listen with
patience, all contribute to the conveying of messages and information between people.
For example, the written word, whether in books and magazines, e-mails or texts, can convey
more than just the writing. It can inspire, elevate and encourage if that is the intention of the
writer. It can also confuse and exasperate if we are not careful! Lynne Truss, in a recent book on
punctuation, pointed out how easily the meaning of the written word can be altered just by
rearranging the punctuation. She invites us to compare the following two sentences; ‘A woman,
without her man, is nothing’, and ‘A woman: without her, man is nothing’!
As human beings we have the ability to express ourselves and share our thoughts and feelings in
many ways. We could live in isolation, never communicating with another person, but that would
not create value. We can keep feelings to ourselves or we can share them. Each person has his or
her unique view of things, and each perspective is valuable. Through sharing these individual
ideas or views with each other, global solutions may be found.
Someone may share an idea that the other person may not have even considered. These differing
views could be compared to a jigsaw puzzle, where each person has their own piece, and when
the pieces fit together, the full picture emerges and a solution is found that may not have been
considered previously.Certainly increased communication that uses technology can be
enormously valuable. Being able to share information quickly between people has meant that a
disaster in one part of the world can be responded to in another; it has led to the fall of corrupt
governments, as people have been able to unite in challenging authoritarian regimes. People in
remote areas fighting injustice have linked up with people on the other side of the world who can
support their cause. As with everything, new technologies such as e-mail and text messaging
have the potential to be positive or negative.
Look at the figure given above and try to answer the following questions:
1. At least how many persons do you need for communication to take place?
2. Can two people communicate if they do not share the same language?
3. If your answer to Q2 above is ‘yes’, then explain how they will communicate.
4. A saint sitting with his eyes closed says he is communicating with God. Do you think it is
an example of communication? Give reasons for your answer.
The Process of
Communication
5. A person was lost in his thoughts with his eyes closed. When asked he said that he was
communicating with self. Would you term it as communication? Discuss with others in
your study center.
Elements of Communication
If we look at the figure given above we can derive the elements of communication as follows:
1. Communication involves at least two persons (a) The addresser and (b) the addressee.
2. The topic: the contents of the message.
3. The channel: the medium through which the message travels, e.g. letter, telephone,e-mail,
etc.
4. The code: the language of the message e.g. English, French, Hindi, etc.
5. The message form: the selection of particular grammar and lexical choices of the
message.
6. The setting: the social and physical setting.
Look at the figure once again. Can you write a paragraph now explaining the process of
communication?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………
The process of decoding by the addressee is not passive as some people think. His/Her role is an
active one. Language, it is said, does not have meaning; it has potential for meaning and it is the
decoder who is actively engaged in making meaning on the basis of his/her background
knowledge and the context of communication e.g. the knowledge of the subject, topic, addresser-
addressee relationship, knowledge of the code, the physical and social context, etc.
The textual meaning of the sentence is not difficult; it is quite clear-but do we know what the
speaker wants to convey? Is it a statement for our information? Is it a warning for the hearer? We
can understand this text only if we know what the context is, i.e. who is the addresser; whom is
s/he addressing; when, where and in what context. Suppose the addresser is the Managing
Director (MD) of a company; and the addressee is his Secretary; the MD utters these words on
arriving in his office and going through a fax message; Mr. Gupta is a consultant with the foreign
collaborators of the company; and he was due to arrive that day for a meeting with the MD and
other officials of the company. If we possess this background knowledge, we will be able to
understand the meaning of the sentence uttered by the MD. This sentence can now be called an
utterance in this context. The secretary can interpret the utterance to mean: ‘The meeting will
have to be cancelled and the officials informed accordingly. Arrangements such as sending the
car to the airport, hotel reservation, etc., if any, made for Mr. Gupta, will have to be cancelled’,
etc. etc.
When we make an utterance we always do something; we use language to perform some function,
e.g. to inform, warn, promise, persuade, etc. and the hearer or the reader can derive the meaning
of the utterance only through actively processing the utterance in the context in which it is made.
Can you think of some of the functions of language? One can be to ‘inform’ someone; or to
‘warn’. Think of some more functions and compare your list with that drawn up by others in your
study centre.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………
1. The emotive function: to communicate the inner states and emotions, e.g. Oh no!
2. The directive function: seeking to affect the behaviour of others, e.g. Cose the door, please.
3. The phatic function: opening the channel or checking that it is working, e.g. Hello, is it
Thomas Cook? or Can you hear me, Mrs. Gupta?
4. The poetic function: the particular form chosen is the essence of the message. This refers to
the aesthetic function of language.
5. The referential function: to carry information.
6. The metalinguistic function: focusing attention on the code itself, e.g. ‘the use of both will
or shall is correct in modern usage.’
7. The contextual function: creating a particular kind of context, e.g. Right! Let’s start the
meeting now.
The Process of
Communication
Which of these functions are often performed in business situations? Give examples to support
your answer.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………
It is said that communication can never be hundred per cent complete. Many factors are involved
in the process of communication and something can always go wrong with one or more of these.
From your own experience, make a list of some of the factors that can impede communication.
h. Affective factors: personal factors e.g. anxiety, fear, attitude, motivation, beliefs, values,
lack of mutual trust, lack of time or pressure of work, lack of attention, and personal
rivalries. All these factors impede communication.
How can the barriers to communication be removed? Discuss with others in your group or class.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………
This does not mean that oral communication is not used in business transactions. Speech is also
used and quite often. It takes the form of face-to-face interaction, telephone conversations,
lectures and talks, meetings and discussions, etc.
Expression through body language is known as gestural communication. Who is not familiar with
the nodding of the head from side to side to say ‘no’ or up and down to convey ‘yes’? Parents
often use this means of communication with their children if they tend to be naughty in the
presence of guests and it is often used in business situations as well in similar circumstances or
when verbal communication is impossible e.g. in the factory where the notice of machinery
makes verbal communication difficult.
Can you think of a situation when gestural communication would be more effective than oral
communication? What kind of messages can be communicated through gestures? Give some
example from your own experience.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The Process of
Communication
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………
Pictures, charts, diagrams are also used either on their own or in combination with written or oral
communication for greater effect and better understanding. Business houses make use of them in
their illustrated catalogues and brochures meant to promote their product.
Communication between officers working at the same level of management is called horizontal
or lateral communication e.g. interaction between manager (Production) and Manager
(Marketing). It involves exchange of ideas, information, opinions or seeking clarifications, etc.
between personnel of the same rank.
When we speak of language as a tool for communication, we mean both spoken and written
forms of the language. Both these modes can be used for communication. While they perform the
same functions, their form and manner of use differ in many respects. For example, one makes
use of sounds, other of symbols. The speaker has available to him/her the full range of voice
quality effects, as well as facial expressions, postural and gestural systems, but these
paralinguistic features are denied to the writer. The writer, on the other hand, has typographical
variety at his/her disposal. The speaker is face-to-face with hearer while the writer writes for an
absent reader who may also be far away in space and time.
These different features have their own advantages and disadvantages. In oral communication the
speaker, being face-to-face with the hearer can monitor and match the reactions of the hearer. At
the same time s/he can simultaneously plan his/her next utterance and fit it in the overall pattern
of what s/he wants to say. S/he must keep on talking during the period allotted to him/her; s/he
must decide when to take his/her turn, how to interrupt his/her interlocutor, how to hand over the
turn--in fact s/he must be in command of all the conversational skills. S/he has certain advantages
as well; s/he can observe his/her interlocutor and, if necessary, modify what s/he is saying. Oral
communication is quicker, more economical and more effective than written communication.
Doubts and misunderstandings can be cleared on the spot as immediate reaction and response is
available.
But it has certain disadvantages also. There are variations in spoken language and also in the way
it is delivered. These could be on account of geographical or social and cultural differences.
There are dialectical differences, accent differences and also differences in the use of
paralinguistic features and body language. Speech is less organized than written language; it
contains many incomplete sentences; often it contains simply sequences of phrases. These
features may easily create misunderstandings. Oral communication is less reliable because it is
not available in future; it is also affected by the attitudes and personality, self-interest, beliefs,
values and prejudices of the sender as well as the receiver and also the time and circumstances of
the communication. Oral communication is also not suitable for lengthy messages to be
communicated to distant and widely scattered people.
Similarly the written mode gives the writer certain advantages as well as disadvantages over the
speaker. Since the writer is writing for an absent reader, s/he may look over, reflect, and edit what
s/he has already written, with no fear of being interrupted by his/her interlocutor; s/he can take
his/her own time in choosing a particular word, even looking it up in the dictionary, if necessary,
reorder what s/he has written, and even change his/her mind about what s/he has to say. S/he is
under no pressure to keep on writing; she can even destroy what s/she has written and throw it
into the dustbin without fear of offending the reader. But the writer has disadvantages too: s/he
has no access to immediate feedback and simply has to imagine the reader’s reactions. This non-
reciprocal nature of written communication makes it more difficult to learn.
Written communication ensures the transmission of information in a uniform manner and there is
little risk of unauthorized alteration in the message. Since it is put in black and white, it provides
a permanent record for future reference. Written communication tends to be complete, precise
and unambiguous. The message can be repeated at regular intervals and lengthy messages can be
sent to widely scattered readers. But written communication is time-consuming, expensive and
rigid and it becomes difficult to maintain secrecy.
In the business world, face-to-face and telephone communications are generally confirmed in
writing by post or e-mail, particularly when the communication is with the world outside. Why do
you think is it necessary to do so? Discuss with others in your Study Centre the comparative
advantages and disadvantages of the telephone mode of communication over face-to-face
interaction.
2. You are the Marketing Manager of a firm. You want to hire a sales supervisor. Which form of
communication would you use to communicate your requirement to the Manager
(Personnel)? Would you prefer to talk to him personally, over the phone, write a letter or
memo? Give reasons for your answer.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………
Brown & Yule (1983) use two terms to describe the major functions of language. The function of
language where the transfer of information is involved is called transactional, and that function
involved in expressing social relations and personal attitudes is called Interactional.
(1) (a) A: There’s no message for you (Transactionl)
B: OK.
(b) A: How are you? (Interacional)
B: Fine, thank you.
In the world of business one has to make use of language for performing both of these functions.
In business transactions, different situations may arise when one has to use language for different
types of face-to-face interactions: (1) conversation for establishing social contact, performing
various functions such as introducing oneself and others, making inquiries, giving and seeking
information, giving instructions, reporting conversations, giving the company’s profile,
describing persons, places and processes, developing relationships, getting people to do things,
offering help, seeking help, apologizing, persuading, elaborating, arguing a point, explaining a
situation, comparing two products, negotiating business deals, asking for and giving advice, etc.
(2) participating in discussions, (3)taking part and conducting meetings and interviews, (4)
lecturing (5)demonstrating company’s products, (6) talking about where you work, describing
simple and everyday operations, describing work and business operations, describing office
working conditions, consulting and reporting to superiors, asking for and giving advice, talking
about problems at work, etc. Most of these encounters will be transactional while some of these
will be interactional.
Conversation
You are already aware of social interaction in business i.e. meeting and greeting people in
business, and developing a conversation. From your observation, can you recall/derive some rules
of face-to-face conversation? Do you think there are rules for conversation in every language of
the world? Native speakers learn naturally as part of their growing up in that society and follow
these rules in their conversation with other native speakers. Discuss this with others in your
Study Centre.
Human beings spend a large part of their lives engaging in conversation and for most of us
conversation is among our most significant and engrossing activities. We have already described
the importance of communication, particularly face-to-face communication. Researchers from
several academic disciplines have looked at conversation as an object of inquiry and come up
with fascinating findings. Our understanding of how people conduct conversations has been
enriched by observations made by psychologists and linguists, among others.
Before we describe the rules of conversation, let us be clear about the term conversation. As
Richards and Schmidt point out, the term conversation is used somewhat ambiguously in current
literature. It is used sometimes to refer to any spoken encounter or interaction and sometimes,
more restrictedly, to:
“…talk occurring when a small number of participants come together and settle into what they
perceive to be a few moments cut off from (or carried on to the side of) instrumental tasks: a
period of idling felt to be an end in itself, during which everyone is accorded the right to talk as
well as to listen and without reference to a fixed schedule; everyone is accorded the status of
someone whose overall evaluation of the subject matter at hand… is to be encouraged and treated
with respect; and no final agreement or synthesis is demanded, differences of opinion to be
treated as unprejudicial to the continuing relationship of the parties.” (Goffman 1976)
All talk, it is pointed out, is rooted in its surroundings. But conversation in this more restricted
sense is not very firmly rooted to the world as other kinds of utterances. The activities which are
directly governed by norms for the use of speech are termed speech events. As speech events,
conversations can be contrasted with other types of speech events such as lectures, discussions,
interviews, debates and meetings.
Conversation is more than merely the exchange of information. When people take part in
conversation, they bring to the conversational process shared assumptions and expectations about
what conversation is, how conversation develops, and the sort of contribution they are each
expected to make. When people engage in conversation they share common principles of
conversation that lead them to interpret each other’s utterances as contributing to the
conversation.
One of the assumptions we make when we take part in conversation is that if I ask you a question,
whatever you say will somehow be interpretable as constituting an answer to my question.
Consider the following example:
In this latter case the speaker B does not seem to have followed the principle described above and
hence the resulting exchange is uninterpretable.
The philosopher Grice has described four Maxims or Principles of Cooperative Behaviour which
speakers observe in conversation. These are:
Conversation is more than a series of exchanges; it consists of exchanges which are initiated and
interpreted according to intuitively understood and socially acquired rules and norms of
conversational cooperation. These can in turn be manipulated to create a wide range of meanings
beyond the level expressed directly by the utterances in the conversation themselves. Consider the
following example:
We can infer the meaning of B’s response. The room is hot, probably because the windows are
closed, so if the window is opened cool fresh air will come in and cool the room. B’s response is
thus quite relevant and interpretable.
We also know that the rules of conversational implicature, dependent on manipulating the four
maxims, can be used to express sarcasm, irony, criticism and a range of other types of inferential
meaning. Consider the following exchange:
B is manipulating the maxims of conversational implicature to suggest that the other qualities of
the food are not worth mentioning.
However, in the business world the emphasis is on clarity of communication and indirect speech
acts and manipulation of maxims are generally avoided.
The relevance of Grice’s Maxims to conversation in a second/foreign language is dependent on
the degree to which such maxims are universal or language specific. In Indian culture, for
example, even during an interview for a job, candidates are very modest while talking about
themselves and their achievements; while in the European context the tendency is to display
oneself to an extent which an Indian might term ‘boasting, or ‘bragging’.
Adjacency Pairs
One way in which meanings are communicated and interpreted in conversation is through the use
of what have been called adjacency pairs. Adjacency pairs are utterances produced by two
successive speakers such that the second utterance is identified as related to the first as an
expected follow-up. The two form a pair, the first utterance constituting a first pair part and the
next utterance constituting a second pair part. Adjacency pair is described as the basic structural
unit in conversation consider he following examples of adjacency pairs:
(a) Greeting-Greeting A: Hi
B: Hi
The basic rule of adjacency pair operation is that when a speaker produces a recognizable first
pair part, s/he should stop talking and the conversational partner should produce a recognizable
second pair part. Adjacency pairs thus provide for turn-taking, and also prescribe the type of
talking that the next talker can do.
Check Your Progress 9
For some adjacency pairs, there is much more freedom for conversationalists responding to first
pair parts, with several options available as second pair parts:
within the conversation. Coherent conversations respect norms concerning choice of topics, for
example, in a business meeting members will take turn to speak only on “the items on the agenda
notified in advance and from among these only on that item which is being discussed at the
moment.”
Topics may develop in a recognizable structure as, for example, the language of buying and
selling, court trial, doctor and patient conversation, etc.
Check Your Progress 11
Write a short conversation between a car dealer and a customer looking for a small family car.
Discuss in your study centre the structure of this conversation in the light of the points made
above.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………
Turn Taking
Conversation by definition involves two or more people. But the distribution of talking among
the participants is not merely random. It is governed by turn-taking norms, conventions which
determine who talks, when, and for how long. One who talks too much and does not allow time
for others, or one who contributes nothing to the conversation arouses negative evaluations.
Rules for turn-taking differ according to the type of speech event. In the classroom, for example,
students generally raise a hand to take a turn to talk.
Repairs
The process of conversation involves monitoring to ensure that the intended messages have been
communicated and understood. This involves correction whenever it is suspected that the
message has not been received as intended. The term-repair refers to the efforts by the speaker or
the hearer to correct trouble spots in conversation. Repairs may be initiated by either the speaker
or the hearer:
The maxims and rules for conversation differ from culture to culture and hence pose problems for
non-native speakers. There may be different conventions operating in the mother tongue and
target language. We have already hinted at some of the problems while describing the maxims
and rules above. Let us consider some more problems and how we can overcome them.
Can you recall what we said above about non-native use of maxim of quantity. Non-native
speakers may provide less information than is expected of them. Another crucial problem could
be to interpret the intended speech act appropriately. Consider what is wrong with the following
interaction:
A: Hello!
B: ABC Distributors. Good Morning.
A: Can I speak to Mr. Malhotra?
B: Yes, you can.
Evidently B has misunderstood A’s question as a question rather than a request to bring the
person on the line. What do you think would be the right response?
Adjacency pairs is another crucial area which poses problem. Questions, particularly yes/no type
questions are not always Requests for information but may be requests for action. The problem
arises because you are taught to reply to yes/no questions with yes or no plus repetition of the
verb or auxiliary used in the question, e.g.
The response may be grammatically correct but does it sound natural to you? Practicing only
yes/no plus repetition of the verb/auxiliary often leads to such short stilted replies which while
grammatically correct may be conversationally inappropriate. What you need is a large stock of
adjacency pairs and practice in using them in a wide range of situations.
Think for a moment how the inquiry in your mother tongue would have been responded to by the
fruit seller. What you require is to practice other adjacency pairs, such as Request-
Grant/Challenge, etc:-
Native speakers often consider non-native speakers overly passive in conversation. There are two
reasons. One that nonnative speakers tend to provide only second pair parts leaving all first pair
parts to their interlocutor, answering questions with ‘yes’ and ‘no’ e.g.
This leads to non-native speakers initiating all questions which rarely happens in natural social
conversation. Instead of simply answering a question, you must learn to answer a question, give
some extra information and ask another question as in the customer-fruit-seller’s conversation
given above.
Openings and closings are also problematic for foreign language learners. The learner may not
know what to say and hence may just transliterate from his/her own mother tongue as in the
following example:
(Context: A customer comes into the store and seems to be looking for something. The shop
assistant comes to him to help him)
Shop Assistant: What do you want, Sir?
The customer does not seem to feel pleased and leaves the store.
What do you think has offended the customer? What should have the shop assistant said to help
the customer?
Another important and very difficult area for the second/foreign language learner is topic
development. Here you must practice nominating or introducing topics about which you are
prepared to speak. You ought to practice predicting questions: elaborating topics, seeking
clarifications, shifting topic, undertaking repairs through words and gestures, and several other
conversational skills. We will come back to these skills in subsequent pages.
Hymes uses the term speech event for activities that are directly governed by norms for the use of
speech. As speech events, conversations can be contrasted with other types of speech events such
as lectures, discussions, meetings, interviews, debates, etc. We recognize each of these speech
events as distinct by virtue of differences in the number of participants who take part in them, as
well as through differences in the type and amount of talking expected of the participant, the
setting, quorum, if any, required, etc. Speech events, like conversations, as shown above, also
have identifiable rules for proper beginnings, middles and endings. Violations if noticed, are
frowned upon.
Openings and closings, as already said above, are speech event-specific. For many speech events,
there is an initial summons, e.g. a memo/notice calling for a meeting and participants assemble
over time before the occasion actually begins. There may be a specified setting (e.g. hall,
classroom) and the persons who assemble are oriented to as specified category members (e.g.
members of the club, union, students faculty at a college lecture). Some events, such as a formal
meeting (e.g. the Annual General Body Meeting of the Company) require a specified number of
participants before the events may properly be seen as beginning, such as a quorum at a meeting.
Some speech events may not begin as soon as the required persons are present. These may
require formal markers before the event properly begins. When the audience assemble for a
lecture, there may be background noise and conversation may be in progress at different corners
in the room, but the lecture itself has not properly begun until an authorized person uses some sort
of attention-getter, saying ‘Right, or O.K. It is time to begin,’ etc.
We will be talking about interviews and meetings in subsequent units when we will illustrate in
detail how these two specific speech events differ from conversation. Here we propose to
consider another feature in which lecture differs from conversation.
While talking about the differences between spoken and written modes we said that one of the
differences between these two modes of communication is that writing is an activity that is non-
reciprocal in nature. Can you recall what we meant by this term non-reciprocal? Lecture, whether
written or spoken from notes, tends to be non-reciprocal in this sense. In other words, there are
no adjacency pairs, no turn taking, no immediate verbal feed-back as we have in conversation
(though in the classroom lecture, the teacher might get feedback from expressions on students
faces, raising of hands, uneasy movements, etc.) so s/he has of necessity to propel the
communication on her/his own. This, however, does not mean that lecture (or written discourse)
is not an interactive process of negotiation. It is interactive but this interaction is conducted by the
speaker himself/herself by enacting the roles of speaker as well as of audience. Since there is no
immediate reaction s/he has to anticipate what it is likely to happen and provide for any possible
misunderstanding and unclarity arising from the lack of shared knowledge.
In the words of Widdowson, the act of lecturing is the enactment of an exchange, with the
speaker taking on the roles of both interlocutors. But whereas in spoken discourse (conversation)
this process of negotiation is typically overt and reciprocal, in lectures and written
communication it is covert and non-reciprocal. Because of the absence of immediate verbal
reaction from her/his audience the speaker has a basic conveyancing problem: S/he has a certain
message to impart and s/he has to prepare the ground and set up conditions favourable to the
reception of such information. S/he does this by continually shifting her/his function from
speaker to hearer, enacting the interaction by playing the role of each interlocutor as in the
following example:-
Yesterday I spoke to you about Canada. Today I shall talk about Australia which happens to be
the next topic. Australia is a land of contrasts. It is geologically one of the oldest of land masses,
yet it ranks as one of the youngest of nations. It is half a world away from Europe, but its people
are largely of European descent and they follow a Western lifestyle.
If we look at the above text we find that the speaker makes an assertion in the first sentence and
the subsequent sentences are then said to support what s/he says in the first sentence as if to
answer the question of the listener, How can you say that? Can you give proof? We can write
this text as follows:
Speaker: Australia is a land of contrasts.
Listener(s): How can you say that? Can you give some proof?
The Process of
Communication
Speaker: It is geologically one of the oldest of land masses, yet it ranks as one of the
youngest of nations.
Listener(s) Can you give more examples?
Speaker: Yes. It is half a world away from Europe, but its people are largely
of European descent and they follow a Western lifestyle.
A lecture, like written discourse, thus involves non-reciprocal interaction and the result of this is a
text. The audience must interpret this text to reconstitute the interaction as it does not reveal the
second person’s (or the audience’s) reactions which the speaker (and the writer) anticipates by
enacting the other participant’s role. It is in this sense that lecturing is covert and non-reciprocal
and differs from conversation which is overt and reciprocal.
1.10 SUMMARY
In this unit we have tried to understand what communication is and defined it as the process of
meaningful interaction between two or more persons with a view to arriving at a common
meaning and understanding. Communication can be achieved through use of language, written or
spoken, and gestures. There are different types of communication and these are used on different
occasions. Each of these mode of communication has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Communication may involve repeated interactions or negotiations of meaning and the addresser
and the addressee play active roles in this process. Effective communication in business is as
important as the blood circulating in the human body and hence managers do their best to
overcome all barriers to communication.
Further, we also described different types of face-to-face interactions, especially conversation, its
main features and how to develop it to make it meaningful. We have also described briefly some
other types of face-to-face interactions and how they differ from each other and from
conversation.
1. Two Persons
2. Yes.
3. Limited communication is possible through gestures
4. No We’ll not term it as social communication.
5. Same as 4.
Open ended
Some points given in Macro Function of Communication.
Open ended
In fact, all normal conversation requires gestures to be effective. “Yes” and “No” are very
common messages through gestures.
(You could suggest other messages from your own experience).
Check Your Progress 7
It can be anything where B would like to oblige A, e.g. guest/host, boss/secretary, wife/husband,
etc.
- Coming mom.
- Bye. (So long).
- Yes. Brought three boxes only this morning. Here you are. See how fresh they’re.
- Thank you.
- It’s quite nice, isn’t it?
- Well. I think it makes me look old.
- Vanita found it for me.
- Thanks. I like yours too.
Open ended