Theoretical Explanations of Deviance
Theoretical Explanations of Deviance
Theoretical Explanations of Deviance
EXPLANATIONS OF
DEVIANCE
BIANCA FIONA G. ESPESO
DEVIANCE
❏ It is defined as the non-observance of various
kinds of norms ranging from simple infractions
of etiquette to the grievous and hateful crimes
like rape.
❏ A violation which causes a negative reaction.
❏ Its definition varies across culture, time, and
situations.
❏ It depends on the reactions from those who
witness the act.
THEORIES OF DEVIANCE
I. STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONAL VIEW
❏ Under this perspective, people deviate from given social norms because of the rapid social changes
that are taking place. Thus, the norms become unclear and are no longer applicable to current
conditions.
❏ Emile Durkheim, one of the proponents of this perspective, called this situation as anomie, lack of
the usual social or ethical standards. He believed that it is the major cause of suicide in
industrialized countries.
❏ There is nothing abnormal about deviance for it is an integral part of the society according to
Durkheim.
II. SOCIAL STRAIN THEORY
❏ Each society has a primary set of values and goals with corresponding means of achieving them.
❏ SOCIAL STRAIN - the gap between the desired goals and the means people use in order to achieve
them.
❏ The desired goals and values in the Philippine society emphasize achieving success through
individual effort.
❏ These days, success is measured in terms of material possessions, popularity and social status.
❏ THE UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED MEANS OF ACHIEVING SUCCESS ARE HARD WORK,
PERSEVERANCE, AND EDUCATION
❏ Failure is regarded as a personal shortcoming.
II. SOCIAL STRAIN THEORY
“The more contact a person has with people who commit deviant acts, the more likely that person is to
engage in deviant activities,” Edwin Sutherland (1961)
According to him, all human behavior, including deviance, is learned through association with others,
especially in primary groups.
Individuals pattern their thinking, acting, and feeling to the norms, values, and beliefs characteristics of
these subcultures. A person’s tendency in engaging in criminal activity depends on his frequency of
association with those who encourage violation of norms compared with those who encourage
conformity.
III. SYMBOLIC INTERACTION THEORY
This theory states that people choose defiance or conformity depending on which will do the most to
enhance their self-esteem.
For example, people who do not get reward for their efforts usually resort to deviant behavior to attract
attention. In Filipino, this is termed as “Kulang sa Pansin (KSP) or nagpapapansin”
III. SYMBOLIC INTERACTION THEORY
Developed by Travis Hirschi (1969), according to him, deviance arises from particular social
arrangements, specifically the inability of society to control inadequately the activities of its members.
Deviance occur when individuals lack the ties to the conventional society such as family, school, church,
peer that are necessary to curb their normal tendency to deviance.
III. SYMBOLIC INTERACTION THEORY
Commitment - the higher one’s commitment to legitimate opportunity, the greater the advantages of
conformity.
Involvement - extensive involvement in legitimate activities such as working on a job, going to school, and
completing homework or hobbies inhibits deviance.
Belief - strong belief in conventional morality and respect for authority figures also control tendencies
toward deviance.
III. SYMBOLIC INTERACTION THEORY
LABELING THEORY
According to Howard Becker (1973), deviance is a result of being labeled in the society. This states that
social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance.
Deviance is nothing more than behavior that people are labeled with. People may also be labeled for
involvement in situations completely beyond their control.
IV. CONFLICT THEORY
According to this theory, social inequality is the root of numerous social problems such as deviance and
crime. It starts when an influential group imposes their norms and values on less powerful groups.
Usually, these norms favor the powerful group, their own interests, and standards of morality. Those who
are regarded as deviant are subjected to punishment by authorities that represent and enforce the views
and norms of the strong or powerful group.
IV. CONFLICT THEORY
1. It is the interests of those in charge, the rich and powerful, which are reflected in any society’s laws
and norms. Those who threaten their wealth or power are labeled as criminals or radicals.
2. The ruling class has enough power to keep themselves from being labeled as deviant; those in
scandals are rarely arrested or sent to jail.
3. There is a widespread belief that all laws and norms are good and natural. People tend to be
concerned over the fact that laws are not equally applied to all members of the society.
FUNCTIONS OF DEVIANCE