Unit - Ii: The Production Function Expresses A Functional Relationship Between Physical Inputs and
Unit - Ii: The Production Function Expresses A Functional Relationship Between Physical Inputs and
PRODUCTION FUNCTION
Introduction:
The production function expresses a functional relationship between physical inputs and
physical outputs of a firm at any particular time period. The output is thus a function of
inputs. Mathematically production function can be written as:
Q = f (A, B, C, D)
Where “Q” stands for the quantity of output and A, B, C, D are various input factors such as
land, labor, capital and organization. Here output is the function of inputs. Hence output
becomes the dependent variable and inputs are the independent variables.
The above function does not state by how much the output of “Q” changes as a consequence
of change of variable inputs. In order to express the quantitative relationship between inputs
and output, Production function has been expressed in a precise mathematical equation i.e.
Y= a + b (x)
Which shows that there is a constant relationship between applications of input (the only
factor input ‘X’ in this case) and the amount of output (y) produced.
Importance:
1. When inputs are specified in physical units, production function helps to estimate the level of
production.
2. It becomes is equates when different combinations of inputs yield the same level of output.
3. It indicates the manner in which the firm can substitute on input for another without
altering the total output.
4. When price is taken into consideration, the production function helps to select the least
combination of inputs for the desired output.
5. It considers two types’ input-output relationships namely ‘law of variable proportions’ and
‘law of returns to scale’. Law of variable propositions explains the pattern of output in the
short-run as the units of variable inputs are increased to increase the output. On the other
hand law of returns to scale explains the pattern of output in the long run as all the units of
inputs are increased.
6. The production function explains the maximum quantity of output, which can be
produced, from any chosen quantities of various inputs or the minimum quantities of various
inputs that are required to produce a given quantity of output.
Production function can be fitted the particular firm or industry or for the economy as whole.
Production function will change with an improvement in technology.
Assumptions:
Production function of the linear homogenous type is invested by Junt Wicksell and first tested by
C. W. Cobb and P.H. Douglas in 1928. This famous statistical production function is known as
Cobb-Douglas production function. Originally the function is applied on the empirical study of the
American manufacturing industry. Cobb-Douglas production function takes the following
mathematical form.
Y= (AKX L1-x)
Where Y=output K=Capital L=Labor
A, ∞=positive constant
Assumptions:
ISOQUANTS:
The term Isoquants is derived from the words ‘iso’ and ‘quant’ – ‘Iso’ means equal and
‘quant’ implies quantity. Isoquant therefore, means equal quantity. A family of iso-
product curves or isoquants or production difference curves can represent a production
function with two variable inputs, which are substitutable for one another within limits.
Isoquants are the curves, which represent the different combinations of inputs producing a
particular quantity of output. Any combination on the isoquant represents the some level of
output.
Q= f (L, K)
Where ‘Q’, the units of output is a function of the quantity of two inputs ‘L’ and ‘K’.
Thus an isoquant shows all possible combinations of two inputs, which are capable of
producing equal or a given level of output. Since each combination yields same output, the
producer becomes indifferent towards these combinations.
Assumptions:
There are only two factors of production, viz. labour and capital.
The two factors can substitute each other up to certain limit
The shape of the isoquant depends upon the extent of substitutability of the two inputs.
The technology is given over a period.
Combination ‘A’ represent 1 unit of labor and 10 units of capital and produces ‘50’ quintals
of a product all other combinations in the table are assumed to yield the same given output of
a product say ‘50’ quintals by employing any one of the alternative combinations of the two
factors labor and capital. If we plot all these combinations on a paper and join them, we will
get continues and smooth curve called Iso-product curve as shown below.
Labor is on the X-axis and capital is on the Y-axis. IQ is the ISO-Product curve which shows all the
alternative combinations A, B, C, D, E which can produce 50 quintals of a product.
Producer’s Equilibrium:
The tem producer’s equilibrium is the counter part of consumer’s equilibrium. Just as the
consumer is in equilibrium when be secures maximum satisfaction, in the same manner, the
producer is in equilibrium when he secures maximum output, with the least cost combination
of factors of production.
The optimum position of the producer can be found with the help of iso-product curve. The
Iso-product curve or equal product curve or production indifference curve shows different
combinations of two factors of production, which yield the same output. This is illustrated as
follows.
Let us suppose. The producer can produce the given output of paddy say 100 quintals by
employing any one of the following alternative combinations of the two factors labor and
capital computation of least cost combination of two inputs.
It is clear from the above that 10 units of ‘L’ combined with 45 units of ‘K’ would
cost the producer Rs. 210/-. But if 17 units reduce ‘K’ and 10 units increase ‘L’, the resulting
cost would be Rs. 172/-. Substituting 10 more units of ‘L’ for 12 units of ‘K’ further reduces
cost pf Rs. 154/-/ However, it will not be profitable to continue this substitution process
further at the existing prices since the rate of substitution is diminishing rapidly. In the above
table the least cost combination is 30 units of ‘L’ used with 16 units of ‘K’ when the cost
would be minimum at Rs. 154/-. So this is they stage “the producer is in equilibrium”.
LAW OF PRODUCTION:
1. When quantities of certain inputs, are fixed and others are variable and
2. When all inputs are variable.
These two types of relationships have been explained in the form of laws.
The law of variable proportions which is a new name given to old classical concept of “Law
of diminishing returns has played a vital role in the modern economics theory. Assume that a
firms production function consists of fixed quantities of all inputs (land, equipment, etc.)
except labor which is a variable input when the firm expands output by employing more and
more labor it alters the proportion between fixed and the variable inputs. The law can be
stated as follows:
“If equal increments of one input are added, the inputs of other production services being
held constant, beyond a certain point the resulting increments of product will decrease i.e.
the marginal product will diminish”. (G. Stigler)
“As the proportion of one factor in a combination of factors is increased, after a point, first
the marginal and then the average product of that factor will diminish”. (F. Benham)
The law of variable proportions refers to the behavior of output as the quantity of one Factor
is increased Keeping the quantity of other factors fixed and further it states that the marginal
product and average product will eventually do cline. This law states three types of
productivity an input factor – Total, average and marginal physical productivity.
Assumptions of the Law: The law is based upon the following assumptions:
The behaviors of the Output when the varying quantity of one factor is combines with a
fixed quantity of the other can be divided in to three district stages. The three stages can
better understand by following the table.
Above table reveals that both average product and marginal product increase in the
beginning and then decline of the two marginal products drops of faster than average
product. Total product is maximum when the farmer employs 6th worker, nothing is
produced by the 7th worker and its marginal productivity is zero, whereas marginal product
of 8th worker is ‘-10’, by just creating credits 8th worker not only fails to make a positive
contribution but leads to a fall in the total output.
Production function with one variable input and the remaining fixed inputs is illustrated as below
From the above graph the law of variable proportions operates in three stages. In the first
stage, total product increases at an increasing rate. The marginal product in this stage
increases at an increasing rate resulting in a greater increase in total product. The average
product also increases. This stage continues up to the point where average product is equal to
marginal product. The law of increasing returns is in operation at this stage. The law of
diminishing returns starts operating from the second stage awards. At the second stage total
product increases only at a diminishing rate. The average product also declines. The second
stage comes to an end where total product becomes maximum and marginal product
becomes zero. The marginal product becomes negative in the third stage. So the total product
also declines. The average product continues to decline.
We can sum up the above relationship thus when ‘A.P.’ is rising, “M. P.’ rises more than “
A. P; When ‘A. P.” is maximum and constant, ‘M. P.’ becomes equal to ‘A. P.’ when ‘A. P.’
starts falling, ‘M. P.’ falls faster than ‘ A. P.’.
Thus, the total product, marginal product and average product pass through three phases,
viz., increasing diminishing and negative returns stage. The law of variable proportion is
nothing but the combination of the law of increasing and demising returns.
The law of returns to scale explains the behavior of the total output in response to change
in the scale of the firm, i.e., in response to a simultaneous to changes in the scale of the firm,
i.e., in response to a simultaneous and proportional increase in all the inputs. More precisely,
the Law of returns to scale explains how a simultaneous and proportionate increase in all the
inputs affects the total output at its various levels.
When a firm expands, its scale increases all its inputs proportionally, then technically there are three
possibilities.
i. The total output may increase proportionately
ii. The total output may increase more than proportionately and
iii. The total output may increase less than proportionately. If increase in the total output
is proportional to the increase in input, it means constant returns to scale. If increase
in the output is greater than the proportional increase in the inputs, it means
increasing return to scale. If increase in the output is less than proportional increase
in the inputs, it means diminishing returns to scale.
Let us now explain the laws of returns to scale with the help of isoquants for a two-input and
single output production system.
ECONOMIES OF SCALE
Production may be carried on a small scale or o a large scale by a firm. When a firm expands
its size of production by increasing all the factors, it secures certain advantages known as
economies of production. Marshall has classified these economies of large-scale production
into internal economies and external economies.
Internal economies are those, which are opened to a single factory or a single firm
independently of the action of other firms. They result from an increase in the scale of output
of a firm and cannot be achieved unless output increases. Hence internal economies depend
solely upon the size of the firm and are different for different firms.
External economies are those benefits, which are shared in by a number of firms or
industries when the scale of production in an industry or groups of industries increases.
Hence external economies benefit all firms within the industry as the size of the industry
expands.
1. Indivisibilities
Many fixed factors of production are indivisible in the sense that they must be used
in a fixed minimum size. For instance, if a worker works half the time, he may be paid half
the salary. But he cannot be chopped into half and asked to produce half the current output.
Thus as output increases the indivisible factors which were being used below capacity can be
utilized to their full capacity thereby reducing costs. Such indivisibilities arise in the case of
labor, machines, marketing, finance and research.
2. Specialization.
Division of labor, which leads to specialization, is another cause of internal economies.
Specialization refers to the limitation of activities within a particular field of production.
Specialization may be in labor, capital, machinery and place. For example, the production
process may be split into four department’s relation to manufacturing, assembling, packing
and marketing under the charge of separate managers who may work under the overall
charge of the general manger and coordinate the activities of the for departments. Thus
specialization will lead to greater productive efficiency and to reduction in costs.
Internal Economies:
Business firm enjoys a number of external economies, which are discussed below:
Thus internal economies depend upon the size of the firm and external economies
depend upon the size of the industry.
Internal and external diseconomies are the limits to large-scale production. It is possible that
expansion of a firm’s output may lead to rise in costs and thus result diseconomies instead of
economies. When a firm expands beyond proper limits, it is beyond the capacity of the
manager to manage it efficiently. This is an example of an internal diseconomy. In the same
manner, the expansion of an industry may result in diseconomies, which may be called
external diseconomies. Employment of additional factors of production becomes less
efficient and they are obtained at a higher cost. It is in this way that external diseconomies
result as an industry expands.
The major diseconomies of large-scale production are discussed below:
Internal Diseconomies:
External Diseconomies:
When many firms get located at a particular place, the costs of transportation increases due
to congestion. The firms have to face considerable delays in getting raw materials and
sending finished products to the marketing centers. The localization of industries may lead to
scarcity of raw material, shortage of various factors of production like labor and capital,
shortage of power, finance and equipment. All such external diseconomies tend to raise cost
per unit.
COST ANALYSIS
Profit is the ultimate aim of any business and the long-run prosperity of a firm depends upon
its ability to earn sustained profits. Profits are the difference between selling price and cost
of production. In general the selling price is not within the control of a firm but many costs
are under its control. The firm should therefore aim at controlling and minimizing cost.
Since every business decision involves cost consideration, it is necessary to understand the
meaning of various concepts for clear business thinking and application of right kind of
costs.
COST CONCEPTS:
A managerial economist must have a clear understanding of the different cost concepts for
clear business thinking and proper application. The several alternative bases of classifying
cost and the relevance of each for different kinds of problems are to be studied. The various
relevant concepts of cost are:
On the other hand opportunity cost implies the earnings foregone on the next best
alternative, has the present option is undertaken. This cost is often measured by assessing the
alternative, which has to be scarified if the particular line is followed.
The opportunity cost concept is made use for long-run decisions. This concept is very
important in capital expenditure budgeting. This concept is very important in capital
expenditure budgeting. The concept is also useful for taking short-run decisions opportunity
cost is the cost concept to use when the supply of inputs is strictly limited and when there is
an alternative. If there is no alternative, Opportunity cost is zero. The opportunity cost of any
action is therefore measured by the value of the most favorable alternative course, which had
to be foregoing if that action is taken.
Implicit costs are the costs of the factor units that are owned by the employer himself. These
costs are not actually incurred but would have been incurred in the absence of employment
of self – owned factors. The two normal implicit costs are depreciation, interest on capital
etc. A decision maker must consider implicit costs too to find out appropriate profitability of
alternatives.
A replacement cost is the price that would have to be paid currently to replace the same
asset. During periods of substantial change in the price level, historical valuation gives a
poor projection of the future cost intended for managerial decision. A replacement cost is a
relevant cost concept when financial statements have to be adjusted for inflation.
4. Short – run and long – run costs:
Short-run is a period during which the physical capacity of the firm remains fixed. Any
increase in output during this period is possible only by using the existing physical capacity
more extensively. So short run cost is that which varies with output when the plant and
capital equipment in constant.
Long run costs are those, which vary with output when all inputs are variable including
plant and capital equipment. Long-run cost analysis helps to take investment decisions.
But the book costs are taken into account in determining the level dividend payable during a
period. Both book costs and out-of-pocket costs are considered for all decisions. Book cost is
the cost of self-owned factors of production.
Variable is that which varies directly with the variation is output. An increase in total output
results in an increase in total variable costs and decrease in total output results in a
proportionate decline in the total variables costs. The variable cost per unit will be constant.
Ex: Raw materials, labor, direct expenses, etc.
Future costs are costs that are expected to be incurred in the futures. They are not actual
costs. They are the costs forecasted or estimated with rational methods. Future cost estimate
is useful for decision making because decision are meant for future.
Common costs are the ones that common are attributed to a particular process or product.
They are incurred collectively for different processes or different types of products. It cannot
be directly identified with any particular process or type of product.
9. Avoidable and unavoidable costs:
Avoidable costs are the costs, which can be reduced if the business activities of a concern
are curtailed. For example, if some workers can be retrenched with a drop in a product – line,
or volume or production the wages of the retrenched workers are escapable costs.
The unavoidable costs are otherwise called sunk costs. There will not be any reduction in
this cost even if reduction in business activity is made. For example cost of the ideal
machine capacity is unavoidable cost.
Some costs are not directly identifiable with a process of product. They are appointed to
various processes or products in some proportion. This cost varies with the variation in the
basis of allocation and is independent of the actions of the executive of that department.
These apportioned costs are called uncontrollable costs.
Sunk costs are those which are not altered by any change – They are the costs incurred in
the past. This cost is the result of past decision, and cannot be changed by future decisions.
Investments in fixed assets are examples of sunk costs.
Economics concept considers future costs and future revenues, which help future planning,
and choice, while the accountant describes what has happened, the economics aims at
projecting what will happen.
COST-OUTPUT RELATIONSHIP
A proper understanding of the nature and behavior of costs is a must for regulation and
control of cost of production. The cost of production depends on money forces and an
understanding of the functional relationship of cost to various forces will help us to take
various decisions. Output is an important factor, which influences the cost.
The cost-output relationship plays an important role in determining the optimum level of
production. Knowledge of the cost-output relation helps the manager in cost control, profit
prediction, pricing, promotion etc. The relation between cost and its determinants is
technically described as the cost function.
C= f (S, O, P, T ….)
Where;
C= Cost (Unit or total cost)
S= Size of plant/scale of production
O= Output level
P= Prices of inputs
T= Technology
Considering the period the cost function can be classified as (a) short-run cost function and
(b) long-run cost function. In economics theory, the short-run is defined as that period during
which the physical capacity of the firm is fixed and the output can be increased only by
using the existing capacity allows to bring changes in output by physical capacity of the firm.
The cost concepts made use of in the cost behavior are total cost, Average cost, and marginal cost.
Total cost is the actual money spent to produce a particular quantity of output. Total cost is
the summation of fixed and variable costs.
TC=TFC+TVC
Up to a certain level of production total fixed cost i.e., the cost of plant, building, equipment
etc, remains fixed. But the total variable cost i.e., the cost of labor, raw materials etc., Vary
with the variation in output. Average cost is the total cost per unit. It can be found out as
follows.
AC = TC
Q
The total of average fixed cost (TFC/Q) keep coming down as the production is increased
and average variable cost (TVC/Q) will remain constant at any level of output.
Marginal cost is the addition to the total cost due to the production of an additional unit of
product. It can be arrived at by dividing the change in total cost by the change in total output.
In the short-run there will not be any change in total fixed cost. Hence change in total cost
implies change in total variable cost only.
Units of Total fixed Total Total cost Average Average Average Marginal
Output Q cost TFC variable (TFC + variable fixed cost cost cost MC
cost TVC TVC) TC cost (TVC (TFC / Q) (TC/Q)
/ Q) AVC AFC AC
0 - - 60 - - - -
1 60 20 80 20 60 80 20
2 60 36 96 18 30 48 16
3 60 48 108 16 20 36 12
4 60 64 124 16 15 31 16
5 60 90 150 18 12 30 26
6 60 132 192 22 10 32 42
The above table represents the cost-output relation. The table is prepared on the basis of the
law of diminishing marginal returns. The fixed cost Rs. 60 May include rent of factory
building, interest on capital, salaries of permanently employed staff, insurance etc. The table
shows that fixed cost is same at all levels of output but the average fixed cost, i.e., the fixed
cost per unit, falls continuously as the output increases. The expenditure on the variable
factors (TVC) is at different rate. If more and more units are produced with a given physical
capacity the AVC will fall initially, as per the table declining up to 3rd unit, and being
constant up to 4th unit and then rising. It implies that variable factors produce more
efficiently near a firm’s optimum capacity than at any other levels of output.
And later rises. But the rise in AC is felt only after the start rising. In the table ‘AVC’ starts
rising from the 5th unit onwards whereas the ‘AC’ starts rising from the 6th unit only so long
as ‘AVC’ declines ‘AC’ also will decline. ‘AFC’ continues to fall with an increase in
Output. When the rise in ‘AVC’ is more than the decline in ‘AFC’, the total cost again begin
to rise. Thus there will be a stage where the ‘AVC’, the total cost again begin to rise thus
there will be a stage where the ‘AVC’ may have started rising, yet the ‘AC’ is still declining
because the rise in ‘AVC’ is less than the droop in ‘AFC’.
Thus the table shows an increasing returns or diminishing cost in the first stage and
diminishing returns or diminishing cost in the second stage and followed by diminishing
returns or increasing cost in the third stage.
In the above graph the “AFC’ curve continues to fall as output rises an account of its spread
over more and more units Output. But AVC curve (i.e. variable cost per unit) first falls and
then rises due to the operation of the law of variable proportions. The behavior of “ATC’
curve depends upon the behavior of ‘AVC’ curve and ‘AFC’ curve. In the initial stage of
production both ‘AVC’ and ‘AFC’ decline and hence ‘ATC’ also decline. But after a certain
point ‘AVC’ starts rising. If the rise in variable cost is less than the decline in fixed cost,
ATC will still continue to decline otherwise AC begins to rise. Thus the lower end of ‘ATC’
curve thus turns up and gives it a U-shape. That is why ‘ATC’ curve are U-shaped. The
lowest point in ‘ATC’ curve indicates the least-cost combination of inputs. Where the total
average cost is the minimum and where the “MC’ curve intersects ‘AC’ curve, It is not be
the maximum output level rather it is the point where per unit cost of production will be at its
lowest.
The relationship between ‘AVC’, ‘AFC’ and ‘ATC’ can be summarized up as follows:
Long run is a period, during which all inputs are variable including the one, which are fixes
in the short-run. In the long run a firm can change its output according to its demand. Over a
long period, the size of the plant can be changed, unwanted buildings can be sold staff can be
increased or reduced. The long run enables the firms to expand and scale of their operation
by bringing or purchasing larger quantities of all the inputs. Thus in the long run all factors
become variable.
The long-run cost-output relations therefore imply the relationship between the total cost and
the total output. In the long-run cost-output relationship is influenced by the law of returns to
scale.
In the long run a firm has a number of alternatives in regards to the scale of operations. For
each scale of production or plant size, the firm has an appropriate short-run average cost
curves. The short-run average cost (SAC) curve applies to only one plant whereas the long-
run average cost (LAC) curve takes in to consideration many plants.
The long-run cost-output relationship is shown graphically with the help of “LCA’ curve.
To draw on ‘LAC’ curve we have to start with a number of ‘SAC’ curves. In the above
figure it is assumed that technologically there are only three sizes of plants – small, medium
and large, ‘SAC’, for the small size, ‘SAC2’ for the medium size plant and ‘SAC3’ for the
large size plant. If the firm wants to produce ‘OP’ units of output, it will choose the smallest
plant. For an output beyond ‘OQ’ the firm wills optimum for medium size plant. It does not
mean that the OQ production is not possible with small plant. Rather it implies that cost of
production will be more with small plant compared to the medium plant.
For an output ‘OR’ the firm will choose the largest plant as the cost of production will be
more with medium plant. Thus the firm has a series of ‘SAC’ curves. The ‘LCA’ curve
drawn will be tangential to the entire family of ‘SAC’ curves i.e. the ‘LAC’ curve touches
each ‘SAC’ curve at one point, and thus it is known as envelope curve. It is also known as
planning curve as it serves as guide to the entrepreneur in his planning to expand the
production in future. With the help of ‘LAC’ the firm determines the size of plant which
yields the lowest average cost of producing a given volume of output it anticipates.
BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS
The study of cost-volume-profit relationship is often referred as BEA. The term BEA is
interpreted in two senses. In its narrow sense, it is concerned with finding out BEP; BEP is
the point at which total revenue is equal to total cost. It is the point of no profit, no loss. In its
broad determine the probable profit at any level of production.
Assumptions:
Merits:
1. Information provided by the Break Even Chart can be understood more easily than
those contained in the profit and Loss Account and the cost statement.
2. Break Even Chart discloses the relationship between cost, volume and profit. It
reveals how changes in profit. So, it helps management in decision-making.
3. It is very useful for forecasting costs and profits long term planning and growth
4. The chart discloses profits at various levels of production.
5. It serves as a useful tool for cost control.
6. It can also be used to study the comparative plant efficiencies of the industry.
7. Analytical Break-even chart present the different elements, in the costs – direct
material, direct labor, fixed and variable overheads.
Demerits:
1. Break-even chart presents only cost volume profits. It ignores other considerations
such as capital amount, marketing aspects and effect of government policy etc.,
which are necessary in decision making.
2. It is assumed that sales, total cost and fixed cost can be represented as straight
lines. In actual practice, this may not be so.
3. It assumes that profit is a function of output. This is not always true. The firm
may increase the profit without increasing its output.
4. A major drawback of BEC is its inability to handle production and sale of multiple products.
5. It is difficult to handle selling costs such as advertisement and sale promotion in BEC.
6. It ignores economics of scale in production.
7. Fixed costs do not remain constant in the long run.
8. Semi-variable costs are completely ignored.
9. It assumes production is equal to sale. It is not always true because generally there may be
opening stock.
10. When production increases variable cost per unit may not remain constant but may
reduce on account of bulk buying etc.
11. The assumption of static nature of business and economic activities is a well-known defect
of BEC.