History of microeconomics

Microeconomics analyzes the market mechanisms that enable buyers and sellers to establish relative
prices among goods and services. Shown is a marketplace in Delhi.

Microeconomics (from Greek prefix mikro- meaning "small" + economics) is a branch

of economics that studies the behaviour of individuals and firms in making decisions regarding the
allocation of scarce resources and the interactions among these individuals and firms.[1][2][3]
One goal of microeconomics is to analyze the market mechanisms that establish relative
prices among goods and services and allocate limited resources among alternative uses.
Microeconomics shows conditions under which free markets lead to desirable allocations. It also
analyzes market failure, where markets fail to produce efficient results.
Microeconomics stands in contrast to macroeconomics, which involves "the sum total of economic
activity, dealing with the issues of growth, inflation, and unemployment and with national policies
relating to these issues".[2] Microeconomics also deals with the effects of economic policies (such as
changing taxation levels) on microeconomic behavior and thus on the aforementioned aspects of the
economy.[4] Particularly in the wake of the Lucas critique, much of modern macroeconomic theories
has been built upon microfoundations—i.e. based upon basic assumptions about micro-level
behavior.

Contents

 1Assumptions and definitions

 2Nature of

 3microeconomic

o 3.1Demand, supply, and equilibrium

o 3.2Measurement of elasticities

o 3.3Consumer demand theory

o 3.4Theory of production

o 3.5Costs of production

o 3.6Opportunity cost

o 3.7Market structure

 3.7.1Perfect Competition

 3.7.2Imperfect competition

 3.7.3Monopolistic competition

 3.7.4Monopoly
  3.7.5Oligopoly

 3.7.6Monopsony

 3.7.7Oligopsony

o 3.8Game theory

o 3.9Labor economics

o 3.10Welfare economics

o 3.11Economics of information

 4Applied

 5History

 6See also

 7References

 8Further reading

 9External links

Assumptions and definitions[edit]

Microeconomic theory typically begins with the study of a single rational and utility
maximizing individual. To economists, rationality means an individual possesses
stable preferences that are both complete and transitive.
The technical assumption that preference relations are continuous is needed to ensure the existence
of a utility function. Although microeconomic theory can continue without this assumption, it would
make comparative statics impossible since there is no guarantee that the resulting utility function
would be differentiable.
Microeconomic theory progresses by defining a competitive budget set which is a subset of
the consumption set. It is at this point that economists make the technical assumption that
preferences are locally non-satiated. Without the assumption of LNS (local non-satiation) there is no
100% guarantee but there would be a rational rise in individual utility. With the necessary tools and
assumptions in place the utility maximization problem (UMP) is developed.
The utility maximization problem is the heart of consumer theory. The utility maximization problem
attempts to explain the action axiom by imposing rationality axioms on consumer preferences and
then mathematically modeling and analyzing the consequences. The utility maximization problem
serves not only as the mathematical foundation of consumer theory but as
a metaphysical explanation of it as well. That is, the utility maximization problem is used by
economists to not only explain what or how individuals make choices but why individuals make
choices as well.
The utility maximization problem is a constrained optimization problem in which an individual seeks
to maximize utility subject to a budget constraint. Economists use the extreme value theorem to
guarantee that a solution to the utility maximization problem exists. That is, since the budget
constraint is both bounded and closed, a solution to the utility maximization problem exists.
Economists call the solution to the utility maximization problem a Walrasian demand function or
correspondence.
The utility maximization problem has so far been developed by taking consumer tastes (i.e.
consumer utility) as the primitive. However, an alternative way to develop microeconomic theory is
by taking consumer choice as the primitive. This model of microeconomic theory is referred to
as revealed preference theory.

The supply and demand model describes how prices vary as a result of a balance between product availability
at each price (supply) and the desires of those with purchasing power at each price (demand). The graph
depicts a right-shift in demand from D1 to D2 along with the consequent increase in price and quantity required
to reach a new market-clearing equilibrium point on the supply curve (S).

The theory of supply and demand usually assumes that markets are perfectly competitive. This
implies that there are many buyers and sellers in the market and none of them have the capacity to
significantly influence prices of goods and services. In many real-life transactions, the assumption
fails because some individual buyers or sellers have the ability to influence prices. Quite often, a
sophisticated analysis is required to understand the demand-supply equation of a good model.
However, the theory works well in situations meeting these assumptions.
Mainstream economics does not assume a priori that markets are preferable to other forms of social
organization. In fact, much analysis is devoted to cases where market failures lead to resource
allocation that is suboptimal and creates deadweight loss. A classic example of suboptimal resource
allocation is that of a public good. In such cases, economists may attempt to find policies that avoid
waste, either directly by government control, indirectly by regulation that induces market participants
to act in a manner consistent with optimal welfare, or by creating "missing markets" to enable
efficient trading where none had previously existed.
This is studied in the field of collective action and public choice theory. "Optimal welfare" usually
takes on a Paretian norm, which is a mathematical application of the Kaldor–Hicks method. This can
diverge from the Utilitarian goal of maximizing utility because it does not consider the distribution of
goods between people. Market failure in positive economics (microeconomics) is limited in
implications without mixing the belief of the economist and their theory.
The demand for various commodities by individuals is generally thought of as the outcome of a
utility-maximizing process, with each individual trying to maximize their own utility under a budget
constraint and a given consumption set.
Nature of[edit]
microeconomic[edit]
The study of microeconomics involves several "key" areas:

Demand, supply, and equilibrium[edit]

Main article: Supply and demand
Supply and demand is an economic model of price determination in a perfectly competitive market.
It concludes that in a perfectly competitive market with no externalities, per unit taxes, or price
controls, the unit price for a particular good is the price at which the quantity demanded by
consumers equals the quantity supplied by producers. This price results in a stable economic
equilibrium.

Measurement of elasticities[edit]
Main article: Elasticity (economics)
Elasticity is the measurement of how responsive an economic variable is to a change in another
variable. Elasticity can be quantified as the ratio of the change in one variable to the change in
another variable, when the later variable has a causal influence on the former. It is a tool for
measuring the responsiveness of a variable, or of the function that determines it, to changes in
causative variables in unitless ways. Frequently used elasticities include price elasticity of
demand, price elasticity of supply, income elasticity of demand, elasticity of substitution or constant
elasticity of substitution between factors of production and elasticity of intertemporal substitution.

Consumer demand theory[edit]

Main article: Consumer choice
Consumer demand theory relates preferences for the consumption of both goods and services to
the consumption expenditures; ultimately, this relationship between preferences and consumption
expenditures is used to relate preferences to consumer demand curves. The link between personal
preferences, consumption and the demand curve is one of the most closely studied relations in
economics. It is a way of analyzing how consumers may achieve equilibrium between preferences
and expenditures by maximizing utility subject to consumer budget constraints.

Theory of production[edit]
Main article: Production theory
Production theory is the study of production, or the economic process of converting inputs into
outputs.[5] Production uses resources to create a good or service that is suitable for use, gift-giving in
a gift economy, or exchange in a market economy. This can include manufacturing,
storing, shipping, and packaging. Some economists define production broadly as all economic
activity other than consumption. They see every commercial activity other than the final purchase as
some form of production.

Costs of production[edit]
Main article: Cost-of-production theory of value
The cost-of-production theory of value states that the price of an object or condition is determined
by the sum of the cost of the resources that went into making it. The cost can comprise any of
the factors of production: labour, capital, land, entrepreneur. Technology can be viewed either as a
form of fixed capital (e.g. plant) or circulating capital (e.g. intermediate goods).
In the mathematical model for the cost of production, the short-run total cost is equal to fixed
cost plus total variable cost. The fixed cost refers to the cost that is incurred regardless of how much
the firm produces. The variable cost is a function of the quantity of an object being produced.

Opportunity cost[edit]
Main article: Opportunity cost
The economic idea of opportunity cost is closely related to the idea of time constraints. One can do
only one thing at a time, which means that, inevitably, one is always giving up other things.
The opportunity cost of any activity is the value of the next-best alternative thing one may have done
instead. Opportunity cost depends only on the value of the next-best alternative. It doesn’t matter
whether one has five alternatives or 5,000.
Opportunity costs can tell when not to do something as well as when to do something. For example,
one may like waffles, but like chocolate even more. If someone offers only waffles, one would take it.
But if offered waffles or chocolate, one would take the chocolate. The opportunity cost of eating
waffles is sacrificing the chance to eat chocolate. Because the cost of not eating the chocolate is
higher than the benefits of eating the waffles, it makes no sense to choose waffles. Of course, if one
chooses chocolate, they are still faced with the opportunity cost of giving up having waffles. But one
is willing to do that because the waffle's opportunity cost is lower than the benefits of the chocolate.
Opportunity costs are unavoidable constraints on behaviour because one has to decide what’s best
and give up the next-best alternative.

Market structure[edit]
Main article: Market structure
Market structure (or market form) refers to features of a market, including the number of firms in
the market, the distribution of market shares between them, product uniformity across firms, how
easy it is for firms to enter and exit the market, and forms of competition in the market. [6][7] A market
structure can have several types of interacting market systems. Different forms of markets are a
feature of capitalism and market socialism, with advocates of state socialism often criticizing markets
and aiming to substitute or replace markets with varying degrees of government-directed economic
planning.
Competition acts as a regulatory mechanism for market systems, with government providing
regulations where the market cannot be expected to regulate itself. One example of this is with
regards to building codes, which if absent in a purely competition regulated market system, might
result in several horrific injuries or deaths to be required before companies would begin improving
structural safety, as consumers may at first not be as concerned or aware of safety issues to begin
putting pressure on companies to provide them, and companies would be motivated not to provide
proper safety features due to how it would cut into their profits.
The concept of "market type" is different from the concept of "market structure." Nevertheless, it is
worth noting here that there are a variety of types of markets.
Perfect Competition[edit]
Main article: Perfect competition
Perfect competition is a situation in which numerous small firms producing identical products
compete against each other in a given industry. Perfect competition leads to firms producing the
socially optimal output level at the minimum possible cost per unit. Firms in perfect competition are
"price takers" (they do not have enough market power to profitably increase the price of their goods
or services). A good example would be that of digital marketplaces, such as eBay, on which many
different sellers sell similar products to many different buyers. Consumers in a perfect competitive
market have perfect knowledge about the products that are being sold in this market.
Imperfect competition[edit]
Main article: Imperfect competition
In economic theory, imperfect competition is a type of market structure showing some but not all
features of competitive markets.
Monopolistic competition[edit]
Main article: Monopolistic competition
Monopolistic competition is a situation in which many firms with slightly different products
compete. Production costs are above what may be achieved by perfectly competitive firms, but
society benefits from the product differentiation. Examples of industries with market structures similar
to monopolistic competition include restaurants, cereal, clothing, shoes, and service industries in
large cities.
Monopoly[edit]
Main article: Monopoly
A monopoly is a market structure in which a market or industry is dominated by a single supplier of
a particular good or service. Because monopolies have no competition they tend to sell goods and
services at a higher price and produce below the socially optimal output level. However, not all
monopolies are a bad thing, especially in industries where multiple firms would result in more costs
than benefits (i.e. natural monopolies).[8][citation needed]

 Natural monopoly: A monopoly in an industry where one producer can produce output at a
lower cost than many small producers.
Oligopoly[edit]
Main article: Oligopoly
An oligopoly is a market structure in which a market or industry is dominated by a small number of
firms (oligopolists). Oligopolies can create the incentive for firms to engage in collusion and
form cartels that reduce competition leading to higher prices for consumers and less overall market
output.[9] Alternatively, oligopolies can be fiercely competitive and engage in flamboyant advertising
campaigns.[citation needed]

 Duopoly: A special case of an oligopoly, with only two firms. Game theory can elucidate
behavior in duopolies and oligopolies.[10]
Monopsony[edit]
Main article: Monopsony
A monopsony is a market where there is only one buyer and many sellers.
Oligopsony[edit]
Main article: Oligopsony
An oligopsony is a market where there are a few buyers and many sellers.

Game theory[edit]
Main article: Game theory
Game theory is a major method used in mathematical economics and business
for modeling competing behaviors of interacting agents. The term "game" here implies the study of
any strategic interaction between people. Applications include a wide array of economic phenomena
and approaches, such as auctions, bargaining, mergers & acquisitions pricing, fair
division, duopolies, oligopolies, social network formation, agent-based computational
economics, general equilibrium, mechanism design, and voting systems, and across such broad
areas as experimental economics, behavioral economics, information economics, industrial
organization, and political economy.

Labor economics
Main article: Labor economics
Labor economics seeks to understand the functioning and dynamics of the markets for wage
labor. Labor markets function through the interaction of workers and employers. Labor economics
looks at the suppliers of labor services (workers), the demands of labor services (employers), and
attempts to understand the resulting pattern of wages, employment, and income.
In economics, labor is a measure of the work done by human beings. It is conventionally contrasted
with such other factors of production as land and capital. There are theories which have developed a
concept called human capital (referring to the skills that workers possess, not necessarily their actual
work), although there are also counter posing macro-economic system theories that think human
capital is a contradiction in terms.

Welfare economics
Main article: Welfare economics
Welfare economics is a branch of economics that uses microeconomics techniques to
evaluate well-being from allocation of productive factors as to desirability and economic
efficiency within an economy, often relative to competitive general equilibrium.[11] It
analyzes social welfare, however measured, in terms of economic activities of the individuals that
compose the theoretical society considered. Accordingly, individuals, with associated economic
activities, are the basic units for aggregating to social welfare, whether of a group, a community, or a
society, and there is no "social welfare" apart from the "welfare" associated with its individual units.

Economics of information]
Main article: Information economics
Information economics or the economics of information is a branch of microeconomic theory
that studies how information and information systems affect an economy and economic decisions.
Information has special characteristics. It is easy to create but hard to trust. It is easy to spread but
hard to control. It influences many decisions. These special characteristics (as compared with other
types of goods) complicate many standard economic theories.[12] The economics of information has
recently become of great interest to many - possibly due to the rise of information based companies
inside the technology industry.[13] From a game theory approach, we can loosen the usual constraints
that agents have complete information to further examine the consequences of having incomplete
information. This gives rise to many results which are applicable to real life situations. For example, if
one does loosen this assumption, then it is possible to scrutinize the actions of agents in situations
of uncertainty. It is also possible to more fully understand the impacts - both positive and negative -
of agents seeking out or acquiring information.[13]

Applied
United States Capitol Building: meeting place of the United States Congress, where many tax laws are passed,
which directly impact economic welfare. This is studied in the subject of public economics.

Applied microeconomics includes a range of specialized areas of study, many of which draw on
methods from other fields. Industrial organization examines topics such as the entry and exit of
firms, innovation, and the role of trademarks. Labor economics examines wages, employment, and
labor market dynamics. Financial economics examines topics such as the structure of optimal
portfolios, the rate of return to capital, econometric analysis of security returns, and corporate
financial behavior. Public economics examines the design of government tax and expenditure
policies and economic effects of these policies (e.g., social insurance programs). Political
economy examines the role of political institutions in determining policy outcomes. Health
economics examines the organization of health care systems, including the role of the health care
workforce and health insurance programs. Education economics examines the organization of
education provision and its implication for efficiency and equity, including the effects of education on
productivity. Urban economics, which examines the challenges faced by cities, such as sprawl, air
and water pollution, traffic congestion, and poverty, draws on the fields of urban geography and
sociology. Law and economics applies microeconomic principles to the selection and enforcement of
competing legal regimes and their relative efficiencies. Economic history examines the evolution of
the economy and economic institutions, using methods and techniques from the fields of economics,
history, geography, sociology, psychology, and political science.

History
Main article: History of microeconomics
Economists commonly consider themselves microeconomists or macroeconomists. The difference
between microeconomics and macroeconomics was introduced in 1933 by the Norwegian
economist Ragnar Frisch, the co-recipient of the first Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in
1969.

 Macroeconomics

References
^ Marchant, Mary A.; Snell, William M. "Macroeconomics and International Policy Terms"(PDF). University of
Kentucky. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2007-03-18. Retrieved 2007-05-04.

1. ^ Jump up to:a b "Economics Glossary". Monroe County Women's Disability

Network. Archived from the original on 2008-02-04. Retrieved 2008-02-22.

2. ^ "Social Studies Standards Glossary". New Mexico Public Education Department. Archived
from the original on 2007-08-08. Retrieved 2008-02-22.

3. ^ "Glossary". ECON100. Archived from the original on 2006-04-11. Retrieved 2008-02-22.

4. ^ Sickles, R., & Zelenyuk, V. (2019). Measurement of Productivity and Efficiency: Theory and
Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781139565981

5. ^ McEachern, William A. (2006). Economics: A Contemporary Introduction (PDF). Thomson

South-Western. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-324-28860-5.

6. ^ Hashimzade, Nigar; Myles, Gareth; Black, John (2017). "market structure". A Dictionary of
Economics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-875943-0.

7. ^ "Monopoly - Economics Help". Economics Help. Archived from the original on 2018-03-14.
Retrieved 2018-03-14.

8. ^ "Competition Counts". ftc.gov. 11 June 2013. Archived from the original on 4 December
2013. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
 9. ^ "Oligopoly/Duopoly and Game Theory". AP Microeconomics Review. 2017. Archivedfrom
the original on 2016-06-25. Retrieved 2017-06-11. Game theory is the main way economists [sic]
understands the behavior of firms within this market structure.

10. ^ Deardorff's Glossary of International Economics (2006). "Welfare

economics."Archived 2017-03-20 at the Wayback Machine

11. ^ • Beth Allen, 1990. "Information as an Economic Commodity," American Economic Review,
80(2), pp. 268–273.
• Kenneth J. Arrow, 1999. "Information and the Organization of Industry," ch. 1, in Graciela
Chichilnisky Markets, Information, and Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, pp. 20–21.
• _____, 1996. "The Economics of Information: An Exposition," Empirica, 23(2), pp. 119–128.
• _____, 1984. Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, v. 4, The Economics of
Information. Description Archived 2012-03-30 at the Wayback Machine and chapter-preview links.
• Jean-Jacques Laffont, 1989. The Economics of Uncertainty and Information, MIT
Press. Description Archived 2012-01-25 at the Wayback Machine and chapter-preview links.

12. ^ Jump up to:a b Varian H.R. (1987) Microeconomics. In: Palgrave Macmillan (eds) The New
Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London

Further reading
Bade, Robin; Michael Parkin (2001). Foundations of Microeconomics. Addison Wesley Paperback 1st Edition.

 Editors, biography.com (August 17, 2016). "Adam Smith Biography.com". A&E Television Networks.

 Bouman, John: Principles of Microeconomics – free fully comprehensive Principles of Microeconomics

and Macroeconomics texts. Columbia, Maryland, 2011

 Colander, David. Microeconomics. McGraw-Hill Paperback, 7th Edition: 2008.

 Dunne, Timothy; J. Bradford Jensen; Mark J. Roberts (2009). Producer Dynamics: New Evidence from
Micro Data. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-17256-9.

 Eaton, B. Curtis; Eaton, Diane F.; and Douglas W. Allen. Microeconomics. Prentice Hall, 5th Edition:
2002.

 Frank, Robert H.; Microeconomics and Behavior. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 6th Edition: 2006.

 Friedman, Milton. Price Theory. Aldine Transaction: 1976

 Hagendorf, Klaus: Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm. Part I: The Competitive Firm. Paris:
EURODOS; 2009.

 Harnerger, Arnold C. (2008). "Microeconomics". In David R. Henderson (ed.). Concise Encyclopedia of

Economics (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Library of Economics and Liberty. ISBN 978-0-86597-665-
8. OCLC 237794267.

 Hicks, John R. Value and Capital. Clarendon Press. [1939] 1946, 2nd ed.

 Hirshleifer, Jack., Glazer, Amihai, and Hirshleifer, David, Price theory and applications: Decisions,
markets, and information. Cambridge University Press, 7th Edition: 2005.
 Jehle, Geoffrey A.; and Philip J. Reny. Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Addison Wesley Paperback,
2nd Edition: 2000.

 Katz, Michael L.; and Harvey S. Rosen. Microeconomics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 3rd Edition: 1997.

 Kreps, David M. A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton University Press: 1990

 Landsburg, Steven. Price Theory and Applications. South-Western College Pub, 5th Edition: 2001.

 Mankiw, N. Gregory. Principles of Microeconomics. South-Western Pub, 2nd Edition: 2000.

 Mas-Colell, Andreu; Whinston, Michael D.; and Jerry R. Green. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford
University Press, US: 1995.

 McGuigan, James R.; Moyer, R. Charles; and Frederick H. Harris. Managerial Economics:
Applications, Strategy and Tactics. South-Western Educational Publishing, 9th Edition: 2001.

 Nicholson, Walter. Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions. South-Western College
Pub, 8th Edition: 2001.

 Perloff, Jeffrey M. Microeconomics. Pearson – Addison Wesley, 4th Edition: 2007.

 Perloff, Jeffrey M. Microeconomics: Theory and Applications with Calculus. Pearson – Addison Wesley,
1st Edition: 2007

 Pindyck, Robert S.; and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. Microeconomics. Prentice Hall, 7th Edition: 2008.

 Ruffin, Roy J.; and Paul R. Gregory. Principles of Microeconomics. Addison Wesley, 7th Edition: 2000.

 Sickles, R., & Zelenyuk, V. (2019). Measurement of Productivity and Efficiency: Theory and Practice.
Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/36161/frontmatter/9781107036161_frontmatter.pdf

 Varian, Hal R. (1987). "microeconomics," The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, v. 3, pp. 461–
63.

 Varian, Hal R. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. W. W. Norton & Company, 8th
Edition: 2009.

 Varian, Hal R. Microeconomic Analysis. W. W. Norton & Company, 3rd Edition: 1992.