Module 9 Human Factor
Module 9 Human Factor
l ~~!~~~~~~S~ci!i~~~~t~~~e System
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
l Module 9
Human Factors
for
l Part-66
]
1
]
I, : <r
/
J
J
.J
I
~.,
Licence Category
J 81 and 82
Preface
Thank you for purchasing the Total Training Support Integrated Training System, We are
sure you will need no other reference material to pass your EASA Part-66 exam in this Module,
These notes have been written by instructors of EASA Part-66 courses, specifically for
practitioners of varying experience within the aircraft maintenance industry, and especially those
who are self-studying to pass the EASA Part-66 exams, They are specifically designed to meet
the EASA Part-66 syllabus and to answer the questions being asked by the UK CM in their
examinations,
The EASA Part-66 syllabus for each sUb-section is printed at the beginning of each of the
chapters in these course notes and is used as the "Learning Objectives",
,, '
L- We suggest that you take each chapter in-turn, read the text of the chapter a couple of times, if
only to familiarise yourself with the location of the information contained within, Then, using
your club66pro.co.uk membership, attempt the questions within the respective sub-section,
\- and continually refer back to these notes to read-up on the underpinning knowledge required to
answer the respective question, and any similar question that you may encounter on your real
Part-66 examination, Studying this way, with the help of the question practice and their
'--' explanations, you will be able to master the subject piece-by-piece, and become proficient in the
subject matter, as well as proficient in answering the CM style EASA part-66 multiple choice
questions.
,.
We regularly have a review of our training notes, and in order to improve the quality of the
notes, and of the service we provide with our Integrated Training System, we would appreciate
your feedback, whether positive or negative.
So, if you discover within these course notes, any errors or typos, or any subject which is not
particularly well, or adequately explained, please tell us, using the 'contact-us' feedback page of
the club66pro.co.uk website, We will be sure to review your feedback and incorporate any
changes necessary. We look forward to hearing from you.
, Finally, we appreciate that self-study students are usually also self-financing, We work very
~
hard to cut the cost of our Integrated Training System to the bare minimum that we can provide,
and in making your training resources as cost efficient as we can, using, for example, mono
printing, but providing the diagrams which would be better provided in colour, on the
club66pro.co.uk website. In order to do this, we request that you respect our copyright policy,
and refrain from copying, scanning or reprinting these course notes in any way, even for sharing
with friends and colleagues. Our survival as a service provider depends on it, and copyright
abuse only devalues the service and products available to yourself and your colleagues in the
future, and makes them more expensive too.
r •
r '
,
Module 9 Preface
TIS Integrated Training System
© CODvriaht 2010
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
clubG6pro.co.uk question practice a'id
Intentionally Blank
, ,i
, )
, i
ii Module 9 Preface
TIS Integrated Training System
© Copyright 2010
r' Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Module 9 Chapters
1. General
2. Human Performance and Limitations
3. Social Psychology
4. Factors Affecting Performance
5. Physical Environment
6. Tasks
7. Communication
8. Human Error
9. Hazards in the Workplace
i .
"
, .
(
,.
!
, )
, ,
Intentionally Blank
-,
iv Module 9 Preface
TIS Integrated Training System
© Copyright 2010
II !
, ,
: .
, '
Training System
!
-
r· .
Module 9
,
'-
,.
I
Human Factors
'-
'-
9.1 General
f .
Copyright Notice
© Copyright. All worldwide rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, • J
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any other means whatsoever: i.e. .~
photocopy, electronic, mechanical recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of I
,
LEVEL 1
• A familiarization with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
• A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• An ability to apply that knowledge.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the
""'1
subject. !
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
LEVEL 3
• A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
• The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
• The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
• The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
• The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
• The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
Table of Contents
:.
,
,
'-'
f '
r'
L--- Use and/or disclosure is Module 9,1 General 1-3
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © Copyright 2010
: '
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro,co,uk question practice aid
. ,
'Murphy's law
. ,
\, j
, j
, J
, ;
1-4
TTS Integrated Training System
Module 9.1 General Use and/or disclosure is
governed by the statement
..
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
L..
, ,
!
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
,'
The Need To Take Human Factors Into Account
In the early days of powered flight, the design, construction and control of aircraft predominated.
The main attributes of the first pilots were courage and the mastery of a whole new set of skills
in the struggle to control the new flying machines.
, . As the technical aspects of flight were overcome bit by bit, the role of the people associated with
I
aircraft began to come to the fore. Pilots were supported initially with mechanisms to help them
stabilise the aircraft, and later with automated systems to assist the crew with tasks such as
navigation and communication. With such interventions to complement the abilities of pilots,
aviation human factors was born.
The term is, perhaps, best known in the context of aircraft cockpit design and Crew Resource
r . Management (CRM). However, those activities constitute only a small percentage of aviation-
related human factors, as broadly speaking it concerns any consideration of human involvement
in aviation.
r -.
,
The use of the term "human factors" in the context of aviation maintenance engineering is
relatively new. Aircraft accidents such as that to the Aloha aircraft in the USA in 1988 and the
r'
, BAC 1-11 windscreen accident in the UK in June 1990 brought the need to address human
,
,
~ factors issues in this environment into sharp focus. This does not imply that human factors
issues were not present before these dates nor that human error did not contribute to other
incidents; merely that it took an accident to draw attention to human factors problems and
potential solutions.
,
Before discussing how these accidents were related to human factors, a definition of human
L factors is required. There are many definitions available. Some authors refer to the subject as
'human factors' and some as 'ergonomics'. Some see "human factors" as a scientific discipline
; ,
and others regard it as a more general part of the human contribution to system safety.
Although there are simple definitions of human factors such as: "Fitting the man to the job and
the job to the man", a good definition in the context of aviation maintenance would be:
I
'--
i
,
'
"Human factors" refers to the study of human capabilities and limitations in the workplace.
Human factors researchers study system performance. That is, they study the interaction of
maintenance personnel, the equipment they use, the written and verbal procedures and rules
they follow, and the environmental conditions of any system. The aim of human factors is to
optimise the relationship between maintenance personnel and systems with a view to improving
safety, efficiency and well-being".
• human physiology;
• psychology (including perception, cognition, memory, social interaction, error);
• work place design;
• environmental conditions;
• human-machine interface;
• anthropometries (the scientific study of measurements of the human body).
· ,
,
· ,
~
• J
· !
It can be helpful to use a model to aid in the understanding of human factors, or as a framework
r' around which human factors issues can be structured. A model which is often used is the SHEL
L model, a name derived from the initial letters of its components:
Hardware (e.g. tools, test equipment, the physical structure of aircraft, design of flight decks,
r ' positioning and operating sense of controls and instruments, etc.);
Environment (e.g. physical environment such as conditions in the hangar, conditions on the
line, etc. and work environment such as work patterns, management structures,
public perception of the industry, etc.);
,.
I
Liveware (i.e. the person or people at the centre of the model, including maintenance
,
~
engineers, supervisors, planners, managers, etc.).
..
,
H
,.
!
s E
L
Figure 1.1: SHEL Model.
L Human factors concentrates on the interfaces between the human (the 'L' in the centre box) and
the other elements of the SHEL model (see Figure 1.1), and - from a safety viewpoint - where
" these elements can be deficient, e.g.:
H: not enough tools, inappropriate equipment, poor aircraft design for maintainability.
r
'- E: uncomfortable workplace, inadequate hangar space, extreme temperatures, excessive
noise, poor lighting.
As will be covered in this document, man, the "Liveware" - can perform a wide range of
activities. Despite the fact that modern aircraft are now designed to embody the latest self-test
and diagnostic routines that modern computing power can provide, one aspect of aviation
maintenance has not changed: maintenance tasks are still being done by human beings. : j
However, man has limitations. Since Liveware is at the centre of the model, all other aspects
(Software, Hardware and Environment) must be designed or adapted to assist his
,
I
performance and respect his limitations. If these two aspects are ignored, the human - in this • j
case the maintenance engineer - will not perform to the best of his abilities, may make errors,
and may jeopardize safety.
Thanks to modern design and manufacturing, aircraft are becoming more and more reliable.
However, it is not possible to re-design the human being: we have to accept the fact that the
human being is intrinsically unreliable. However, we can work around that unreliability by
providing good training, procedures, tools, duplicate inspections, etc. We can also reduce the
potential for error by improving aircraft design such that, for example, it is physically impossible
to reconnect something the wrong way round.
I
L J
1· ,
!
· J
·,
, 1
In 1940, it was calculated that approximately 70% of all aircraft accidents were attributable to
man's performance, that is to say human error. When the International Air Transport
Association (lATA) reviewed the situation 35 years later, they found that there had been no
reduction in the human error component of accident statistics (Figure 1.2).
Figure 1.2: The dominant role played by human performance in civil aircraft accidents
,
'-
,
I
I
c....
,.
I
,
'-
,
c....
A study was carried out in 1986, in the USA, looking at significant accident causes in 93 aircraft
accidents. These were as follows:
Causes/maior contributory factors % of accidents in which this was a factor '- -'
• Design faults 13
• Runways hazards 7
As can be seen from the list, maintenance and inspection deficiencies are one of the major
contributory factors to accidents.
The UK CM carried out a similar exercise in 1998 looking at causes of 621 global fatal
accidents between 1980 and 1996. Again, the area "maintenance or repair oversight terror
/inadequate" featured as one of the top 10 primary causal factors.
\ J
It is clear from such studies that human factors problems in aircraft maintenance engineering
are a significant issue, warranting serious consideration.
,,)
c--,
I
• Accident to Boeing 737, (Aloha flight 243), Maui, Hawaii, April 28 1988;
• Accident to BAC One-Eleven, (British Airways flight 5390), over Oidcot, Oxfordshire on
10 June 1990;
• Incident involving Airbus A320, G-KMAM at London Gatwick Airport, on 26 August 1993;
• Incident involving Boeing 737, G-OBMM near Oaventry, on 23 February 1995.
There were several human factors issues contributing to this incident, including perceptual
r •
. errors made by the SMM when identifying the replacement bolts, poor lighting in the stores
area, failure to wear spectacles, circadian effects, working practices, and possible
organizational and design factors.
G-KMAM
An incident in the UK in August 1993 involved an Airbus 320 which, during its first flight after a
flap change, exhibited an undemanded roll to the right after takeoff. The aircraft returned to
Gatwick and landed safely. The investigation discovered that during maintenance, in order to .~
replace the right outboard flap, the spoilers had been placed in maintenance mode and moved :
, ,
using an incomplete procedure; specifically the collars and flags were not fitted. The purpose of
the collars and the way in which the spoilers functioned was not fully understood by the
engineers. This misunderstanding was due, in part, to familiarity of the engineers with other
, J
aircraft (mainly 757) and contributed to a lack of adequate briefing on the status of the spoilers
during the shift hand over. The locked spoiler was not detected during standard pilot functional
checks.
G-OBMM
In the UK in February 1995,a Boeing 737-400 suffered a loss of oil pressure on both engines.
The aircraft diverted and landed safely at Luton Airport. The investigation discovered that the
aircraft had been subject to borescope inspections on both engines during the preceding night
, j
and the high pressure (HP) rotor drive covers had not been refitted, resulting in the loss of
almost all the oil from both engines during flight. The line engineer was originally going to carry
out the task, but for various reasons he swapped jobs with the base maintenance controller.
The base maintenance controller did not have the appropriate paperwork with him. The base
maintenance controller and a fitter carried out the task, despite many interruptions, but failed to
refit the rotor drive covers. No ground idle engine runs (which would have revealed the oil leak)
were carried out. The job was signed off as complete.
-.
I
In all three of these UK incidents, the engineers involved were considered by their companies to
be well qualified, competent and reliable employees. All of the incidents were characterized by
the following:
" ,
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro,co.uk question practice aid
r c
r ' As with many incidents and accidents, all the examples above involved a series of human
factors problems which formed an error chain (see Figure 1.3).lf anyone of the links in this
'chain' had been broken by building in measures which may have prevented a problem at one
r • or more of these stages, these incidents may have been prevented.
r
c ..._
r •
r
L ~!d.:'Ii't'.nanc.
,.
Murphy's Law
There is a tendency among human beings towards complacency .The belief that an accident
will never happen to "me" or to "my Company" can be a major problem when attempting to
convince individuals or organizations of the need to look at human factors issues, recognize
risks and to implement improvements, rather than merely to pay 'lip-service' to human factors.
: J
"Murphy's Law" can be regarded as the notion: "If something can go wrong, it will ."
If everyone could be persuaded to acknowledge Murphy's Law, this might help overcome the "it
will never happen to me" belief that many people hold. It is not true that accidents only happen
to people who are irresponsible or 'sloppy '.The incidents and accidents described show that
errors can be made by experienced, well-respected individuals and accidents can occur in
organizations previously thought to be "safe".
. )
Dr James Reason
James Reason is considered the leading authority on the study of human error. Many of the
theories described in these notes were propounded by him.
'-'
James Reason is professor of psychology at the University of Manchester, United
Kingdom. His primary research interest is human performance in hazardous
i ' systems. In 1999, Professor Reason was a member of the chief medical officer's
expert group on 'learning from experience' and was also adviser to the Bristol
Royal Infirmary InqUiry. In 1995, he received the Distinguished Foreign Colleague
Award from the United States Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. From
i
'-- 1962 to 1977, Dr. Reason worked at the Royal Airforce Institute of Aviation
Medicine, the United States Naval Aerospace Medical Institute and the University of Leicester.
He has published books on motion sickness, transport human factors, absent-minded ness,
,
:..... human error, and on managing the risks of organizational accidents. He is a fellow of the British
Psychological Society, the Aeronautical Society, and the British Academy. Professor Reason
r . holds a Ph.D. in psychology and physiology from the University of Leicester, United Kingdom.
"Either you manage human error or human error will manage you."
'If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem'
,
'-"'
There is bad news and good news:
Maintenance-related activities are so error-provoking that it is hard to believe that they have not
r ' been contrived by some malign mastermind.
Additional refinements
• People who write the manuals and procedures hardly ever do the job for real.
'- • People who start on a job are not necessarily the ones to finish it.
• Several groups work on same aircraft at same time and/or sequentially.
'- "Small wonder, then, that maintenance attracts more than its fair share of errors"
r'
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.1 General 1-15
governed by the statement TTS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this cI1apter. © Copyright 2010
Integrated Training System "'
Designed in association with the
club66pro,co.uk question practice aid
Many people regard errors as random occurrences, events that are so wayward and
unpredictable as to be beyond effective control. But this is not the case. While it is true that
, )
chance factors play their part and that human fallibility will never be wholly eliminated, the large
majority of slips, lapses and mistakes fall into systematic and recurrent patterns. Far from being
entirely unpredictable happenings, maintenance mishaps fall mostly into well-defined clusters
shaped largely by situation and task factors that are common to maintenance activities in · )
general. That these errors are not committed by a few careless or incompetent individuals is
evident from the way that different people in different kinds of maintenance organisations keep
on making the same blunders.
One of the basic principles of error management is that the best people can make the worst
· )
mistakes.
So the good news boils down to this: the maintenance error problem can be managed in the
same way that any well-defined business risk can be managed. And because most
maintenance errors occur as recognisable and recurrent types, limited resources can be
targeted to achieve maximum remedial effect. It should be stressed, however, that there is no
one best way of limiting and containing human error. Effective error management requires a
·,
wide variety of counter-measures directed at different levels of the system: the individual, the
team, the task, the workplace and the organisation as a whole. , J
'. J
· ,
,,
,
( .
( ,
TTS Integrated
i '
'~
i
'-
I"
,
~
Training System
, .
;
Module 9
L
Human Factors
!
,
'-
I '
,
9.2 Human Performance
,,
'-
,
and Limitations
L
,
~
,.
I
'--
, '
I
,
.
,(
"
-'
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-1
I" governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
I on page 2 of this chapter. © Cnnvrinht ?:01 0
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro,co.uk question practice aid
,-
Copyright Notice , ,
,
© Copyright. All worldwide rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
,.., I
" j
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any other means whatsoever: i.e.
photocopy, electronic, mechanical recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of
Total Training Support Ltd.
:,
Knowledge Levels - Category A, B1, B2 and C Aircraft -,
Maintenance Licence -j
Basic knowledge for categories A, B1 and B2 are indicated by the allocation of knowledge levels indicators (1,2 or
3) against each applicable subject. Category C applicants must meet either the category B1 or the category B2
basic knowledge levels. ,
· J
The knowledge level indicators are defined as follows:
LEVEL 1
• A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject. j
• The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and • j
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
• A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• An ability to apply that knowledge. '. J
Objectives:
• The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the ; J
subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
·J
LEVEL 3
• A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
• The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects. !
, J
• The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
• The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
• The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics , ,,
describing the subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
• The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
2-2 Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations Use andfor disclosure is
ITS Integrated Training System govemed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
L
r '
~ Table of Contents
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-3
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. [c) r:nnvrinht ?010
Integrated Training System ,....,
\
Designed in association with the , J
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
--,
Module 9.2 Enabling Objectives .I
Hearing; .J
Information processing;
Memory
,
, ;
, J
• __ J
" j
.,
, .J
2-4 Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System govemed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
,, '
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
I
,
~
,, '
Mechanical components in aircraft can, on occasion, suffer catastrophic failures, Man, can also
I
L fail to function properly in certain situations, Physically, humans become fatigued, are affected
by the cold, can break bones in workplace accidents, etc, Mentally, humans can make errors,
( . have limited perceptual powers, can exhibit poor judgment due to lack of skills and knowledge,
etc, In addition, unlike mechanical components, human performance is also affected by social
and emotional factors, Therefore failure by aircraft maintenance engineers can also be to the
detriment of aircraft safety.
L
The aircraft engineer is the central part of the aircraft maintenance system, It is therefore very
! ' useful to have an understanding of how various parts of his body and mental processes function
'[
c... and how performance limitations can influence his effectiveness at work.
, '
!
, '
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-5
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © Coovriaht 2010
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
:I
I
~ ___ J
i
"
"
!
,
!
".!
, j
Intentionally Blank ,,
, ,
l... J
~. J
I
-.
I
• j
-,
2-6 Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
r '
!
Vision
r'
I
~
Vitreous chamber
(full of vitreous humour)
, .
r
Retina
'-'
Pupil
r "
Retinal arteries
r '
r •
i
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-7
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © r.nnvrinht ?010
· ,
Integrated r~~L~~~2o~Yo~;;~ 1
, J
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
The Cornea
'-- i
!
The cornea is a clear 'window' at the very front of the eye. The cornea acts as a fixed focusing
device. The focusing is achieved by the shape of the cornea bending the incoming light rays.
The cornea is responsible for between 70% and 80% of the total focusing ability (refraction) of
, J
the eye.
~
, ,
The Iris and Pupil ,
The iris (the coloured part of the eye) controls the amount of light that is allowed to enter the "J
eye. It does this by varying the size of the pupil (the dark area in the centre of the iris). The size
of the pupil can be changed very rapidly to cater for changing light levels. The amount of light ,
L. J
can be adjusted by a factor of 5:1.
The Lens
After passing through the pupil, the light passes through the lens. Its shape is changed by the
muscles (ciliary muscles) surrounding it which results in the final focusing adjustment to place a
sharp image onto the retina. The change of shape of the lens is called accommodation. In
order to focus clearly on a near object, the lens is thickened. To focus on a distant point, the
lens is flattened. The degree of accommodation can be affected by factors such as fatigue or
the ageing process.
When a person is tired accommodation is reduced, resulting in less sharp vision (sharpness of
vision is known as visual acuity).
The Retina
The retina is located on the rear wall of the eyeball. It is made up of a complex layer of nerve ,
'- 1
cells connected to the optic nerve. Two types of light sensitive cells are found in the retina -
rods and cones .The central area of the retina is known as the fovea and the receptors in this
area are all cones. It is here that the visual image is typically focused. Moving outwards, the , ,
cones become less dense and are progressively replaced by rods, so that in the periphery of
the retina, there are only rods.
Cones function in good light and are capable of detecting fine detail and are colour sensitive.
This means the human eye can distinguish about 1000 different shades of colour.
\, .J
Rods cannot detect colour. They are poor at distinguishing fine detail, but good at detecting
movement in the edge of the visual field (peripheral vision). They are much more sensitive at
lower light levels. As light decreases, the sensing task is passed from the cones to the rods.
This means in poor light levels we see only in black and white and shades of grey.
At the point at which the optic nerve joins the back of the eye, a 'blind spot' occurs. This is not
evident when viewing things with both eyes (binocular vision), since it is not possible for the
image of an object to fall on the blind spots of both eyes at the same time. Even when viewing
,J
with one eye (monocular vision), the constant rapid movement of the eye (saccades) means
that the image will not fall on the blind spot all the time. It is only when viewing a stimulus that
appears very fleetingly (e.g. a light flashing), that the blind spot may result in something not
being seen. In maintenance engineering, tasks such as close visual inspection or crack
" j
2-8 Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations Use andlor disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System govemed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter,
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
r '
I
detection should not cause such problems, as the eye or eyes move across and around the
L area of interest (visual scanning).
!
l.... Factors Affecting Clarity of Sight
The eye is very sensitive in the right conditions (e,g. clear air, good light, etc,). In fact, the eye
has approximately 1.2 million nerve cells leading from the retinas to the area of the brain
responsible for vision, while there are only about 50,000 from the inner ears -making the eye
about 24 times more sensitive than the ear.
L
Before considering factors that can influence and limit the performance of the eye, it is
necessary to describe visual acuity.
Visual acuity is the ability of the eye to discriminate sharp detail at varying distances,
L An individual with an acuity of 20/20 vision should be able to see at 20 feet that which the so-
called 'normal' person is capable of seeing at this range. It may be expressed in metres as 6/6
I' vision. The figures 20/40 mean that the observer can read at 20 feet what a 'normal' person
L can read at 40 feet.
Various factors can affect and limit the visual acuity of the eye. These include:
l.... • physical imperfections in one or both eyes (short sighted ness, long sighted ness),
• age,
• drugs,
• medication,
• alcohol,
L • cigarettes.
Blind Spot
Occurs at the point where the optic nerve enters the retina (between the rods & cones).
~
Facial features such as the nose also contribute to this problem. 1
!
l j
Hold picture away and focus on the circle with the right eye. Move the page slowly to the face
and at some point the triangle shall disappear .... the blind spot.
· ,,
,
o \. J
, ,
· j
·,
, I
· ,
,
• J
I
• J
L
,' Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Physical Factors
Long sight - known as Hypermetropia - is caused by a shorter than normal eyeball which means
that the image is formed behind the retina (Figure 2.3). If the comea and the lens cannot use
their combined focusing ability to compensate for this, blurred vision will result when looking at
close objects.
Farsighted focus
i )
( ,
A convex lens overcomes long sighted ness by bending light inwards before it reaches the
cornea.
,.
Short sight - known as Myopia - is where the eyeball is longer than normal, causing the image
to be formed in front of the retina (Figure 2.4). If the accommodation of the lens cannot
counteract this then distant objects are blurred.
i
'-'
! '
A concave lens overcomes short sightedness by bending light outwards before it reaches the
L cornea.
Finally as a person grows older, the lens becomes less flexible meaning that it is unable to
accommodate sufficiently. This is known as presbyopia and is a form of long sightedness.
Consequently, after the age of 40, spectacles may be required for near vision, especially in poor
(
I
.
Usa andfor disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-11
governed by the statement ITS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © Convriaht 2010
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro,co.uk question practice aid
light conditions. Fatigue can also temporarily affect accommodation, causing blurred vision for
close work.
~
Foreign Substances , ,
,.1
Vision can be adversely affected by the use of certain drugs and medications, alcohol, and
smoking cigarettes. With smoking, carbon monoxide which builds up in the bloodstream allows J
less oxygen to be carried in the blood to the eyes. This is known as hypoxia and can impair · .'
rapidly the sensitivity of the rods. Alcohol can have similar effects, even hours after the last
drink.
, )
Environmental Factors , ,
Vision can be improved by increasing the lighting level, but only up to a point, as the law of
diminishing returns operates. Also, increased illumination could result in increased glare. Older
, ;
people are more affected by the glare of reflected light than younger people. Moving from an
extremely bright environment to a dimmer one has the effect of vision being severely reduced
until the eyes get used to less light being available. This is because the eyes have become light "i
adapted. If an engineer works in a very dark environment for a long time, his eyes gradually
become dark adapted allowing better visual acuity. This can take about 7 minutes for the cones
and 30 minutes for the rods. As a consequence, moving between a bright hanger (or the inside
· )
of an aircraft) to a dark apron area at night can mean that the maintenance engineer must wait
for his eyes to adjust (adapt). In low light conditions, it is easier to focus if you look slightly to
one side of an object. This allows the image to fall outside the fovea and onto the part of the
retina that has many rods.
Any airborne particles such as dust, rain or mist can interfere with the transmission of light
through the air, distorting what is seen. This can be even worse when spectacles are worn, as
they are susceptible to getting dirty, wet, misted up or scratched. Engineers who wear contact
lenses (especially hard or gas-permeable types) should take into account the advice from their
optician associated with the maximum wear time -usually 8 to 12 hours - and consider the
effects which extended wear may have on the eyes, such as drying out and irritation. This is
particularly important if they are working in an environment which is excessively dry or dusty, as · J
airborne particles may also affect contact lens wear. Goggles should be worn where necessary.
.--,
· !
The Nature of the Object Being Viewed
Many factors associated with the object being viewed can also influence vision. We use
information from the objects we are looking at to help distinguish what we are seeing. These are ,~ 1
known as visual cues. Visual cues often refer to the comparison of objects of known size to
unknown objects. An example of this is that we associate small objects with being further away.
.--,
, .
Similarly, if an object does not stand out well from its background (Le. it has poor contrast with
its surroundings), it is harder to distinguish its edges and hence its shape. Movement and
relative motion of an object, as well as distance and angle of the object from the viewer, can all
increase visual demands.
,, • Recognising components;
• Distinguishing between wires;
• Using various diagnostic tools;
[.
• Recognising various lights on the airfield (e.g. warning lights).
Colour defective vision is usually hereditary, although may also occur as a temporary condition
r ,
after a serious illness.
r .
Colour defective vision (normally referred to incorrectly as colour blindness, 'Daltonism') affects
about 8% of men but only 0.5% of women. The most common type is difficulty in distinguishing
L.. between red and green. More rarely, it is possible to confuse blues and yellows.
r '
There are degrees of colour defective vision, some people suffering more than others.
r • Individuals may be able to distinguish between red and green in a well-lit situation but not in low
light conditions. Colour defective people typically see the colours they have problems with, as
shades of neutral grey.
r ;
[ Ageing also causes changes in colour vision. This is a result of progressive yellowing of the
'-
lens, resulting in a reduction in colour discrimination in the blue-yellow range. Colour defective
,, vision and its implications can be a complex area and care should be taken not to stop an
engineer from performing certain tasks merely because he suffers from some degree of colour
deficient vision. It may be that the type and degree of colour deficiency is not relevant in their
particular job. However, if absolutely accurate colour discrimination is critical for a job, it is
important that appropriate testing and screening be put in place.
f •
I
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-13
govemed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © Coovriaht 2010
Integrated Training System n
I
I
Designed in association with the [, J
c1ub66pro,cQ,uk question practice aid
When it tries to focus the more violet colours that prevail at night. In dim conditions the lens has
enough elasticity to focus the light from near objects (thus near sightedness) but cannot focus
properly on objects further away.
, J
In the UK, the CM have produced guidance (CMIP Leaflet 15-6, previously published as
Airworthiness Notice 47) which states: , j
"A reasonable standard of eyesight is needed for any aircraft engineer to perform his duties to
an acceptable degree. Many maintenance tasks require a combination of both distance and , ,
near vision. In particular, such consideration must be made where there is a need for the close
visual inspection of structures or work related to small or miniature components. The use of
glasses or contact lenses to correct any vision problems is perfectly acceptable and indeed they
must be worn as prescribed. Frequent checks should be made to ensure the continued
adequacy of any glasses or contact lenses. In addition, colour discrimination may be necessary
for an individual to drive in areas where aircraft manoeuvre or where colour coding is used, e.g.
in aircraft wiring.
Organisations should identify any specific eyesight requirement and put in place suitable
procedures to address these issues."
Often, airline companies or airports will set the eyesight standards for reasons other than
aircraft maintenance safety, e.g. for insurance purposes, or for driving on the airfield. •. i
Ultimately, what is important is for the individual to recognise when his vision is adversely
affected, either temporarily or permanently, and to consider carefully the possible
consequences should they continue to work if the task requires good vision.
· )
• J
-,
· ,
I
2-14 Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations Use andfor disclosure is
ITS Integrated Training System governed by the statement -,
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
!
r ; Integrated Training System
Designed in association witl, the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
, ,
Hearing
As can be seen in Figure 2,5, the ear has three divisions: outer ear, middle ear and inner ear.
,
(
These act to receive vibrations from the air and turn these signals into nerve impulses that the
brain can recognise as sounds.
( ,
Incus Eustachian
meatus (anvil) tube
Round window
! ' Stapes
memblOne (stirrup)
( ,
(ear drum)
( ,
I •
r '
I
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-15
governed by the statement TTS Integrated Training System
I' ,
on page 2 of this chapter. IC'l r.nmlrinht ?f"l1 n
Integrated Training System ,
Designed in association with the , ,
, J
club66pro,co.uk question practice aid
J
Outer Ear l
The outer part of the ear directs sounds down the auditory canal, and on to the eardrum .The
sound waves will cause the eardrum to vibrate.
, )i
Middle Ear
Beyond the eardrum is the middle ear which transmits vibrations from the eardrum by way of ",,
,
j
three small bones known as the ossicles , to the fluid of the inner ear. The middle ear also c,
contains two muscles which help to protect the ear from sounds above 80 dB by means of the
acoustic or aural reflex, reducing the noise level by up to 20 dB. However, this protection can
only be provided for a maximum of about 15 minutes, and does not provide protection against
sudden impulse noise such as gunfire. It does explain why a person is temporarily 'deafened'
for a few seconds after a sudden loud noise. The middle ear is usually filled with air which is
refreshed by way of the eustachian tube which connects this part of the ear with the back of
the nose and mouth. However, this tube can allow mucus to travel to the middle ear which can
build up, interfering with normal hearing.
J
Inner Ear
Unlike the middle ear, the inner ear is filled with fluid. The last of the ossicles in the middle ear is
connected to the cochlea .This contains a fine membrane (the basilar membrane) covered in
hair-like cells which are sensitive to movement in the fluid. Any vibrations they detect cause
neural impulses to be transmitted to the brain via the auditory nerve.
The amount of vibration detected in the cochlea depends on the volume and pitch of the original
sound.
cycles per second (or Hertz), with greatest sensitivity at about 3000 Hz.
. ,,
, ,
2-16 Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations Use and/or disclosure is
ITS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
C '
L. Volume (or intensity) of sound is measured in decibels (dB). Table 2.1 shows intensity levels for
various sounds and activities.
,
~
Approximate
, '
Activity Intensity level
(Decibels)
Rustling of leaves !Whisper 20
Conversation at 2m 50
Typewriter at 1m 65
Car at 15m 70
,. Lorry at 15m 75
Power Mower at 2m 90
Propeller aircraft at 300m 100
Jet aircraft at 300m 110
.
w Standingnear a propeller aircraft 120
Threshold of pain 140
Immediate hearing damage results 150
...
,_ Table 2.1 TYPical sound levels for various activities
i '
I .
r .
i
'-
i '
(
,I
.
Use andfcr disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-17
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. lEI rnnllrinht ?n1 n
" j
Intermittent and sudden noise are generally considered to be more disruptive than continuous
noise at the same level. In addition, high frequency noise generally has a more adverse affect ", i
on performance than lower frequency. Noise tends to increase errors and variability, rather than , )
Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL). The hearing loss can be temporary -lasting from a few seconds
to a few days -or permanent. Temporary hearing loss may be caused by relatively short :
exposure to very loud sound, as the hair-like cells on the basilar membrane take time to c. J
'recover'. With additional exposure, the amount or recovery gradually decreases and hearing
loss becomes permanent. Thus, regular exposure to high levels of noise over a long period may
permanently damage the hair-like cells in the cochlea, leading to irreversible hearing
impairment.
'.
UK 'Noise at Work' regulations stipulate three levels of noise at which an employer must act: )
85 decibels (if normal speech cannot be heard clearly at 2 metres), employer must;
• assess the risk to employees' hearing"
• tell the employees about the risks and what precautions are proposed,
• provide their employees with personal ear protectors and explain their use.
90 decibels (if normal speech cannot be heard clearly at 1 metre), employer must;
• do all that is possible to reduce exposure to the noise by means other than by providing
hearing protection,
• mark zones where noise reaches the second level and provide recognized signs to
restrict entry.
The combination of duration and intensity of noise can be described as noise dose.
Exposure to any sound over 80 dB constitutes a noise dose, and can be measured over the day
as an 8 hour Time Weighted Average sound level (TWA).
: J
For example, a person subjected to 95 decibels for 3.5 hours, then 105 decibels for 0.5 hours,
then 85 decibels for 4 hours, results in a TWA of 93.5 which exceeds the recommended
maximum TWA of 90 decibels.
Permanent hearing loss may occur if the TWA is above the recommended maximum.
r '
,
L..
It is normally accepted that a TWA noise level exceeding 85 dB for 8 hours is hazardous and
potentially damaging to the inner ear. Exposure to noise in excess of 115 decibels without ear
r . protection, even for a short duration, is not recommended.
L
r ' High and Low Tone Deafness
The normal human ear is sensitive to frequencies between about 20 Hz and 20,000 Hz, being
particularly sensitive in eth range 1000 Hz to 4000 Hz and progressively less sensitive at higher
r •
and lower frequencies.
I
This is very important when measuring noise since two sounds of equal intensity, but of different
frequency, may appear subjectively to be of different loudness.
In the cochlea there are 23,000 nerve cells and each has about 100 sensory hairs. These hairs
sense the vibration of the ossicles.
There are two sizes of hair; long; which detect low frequencies, and short; which detect high
r '
frequencies. Deterioration of the sensory hairs occurs with over exposure to high levels of
noise.
Hearing Protection
Hearing protection is available, to a certain extent, by using ear plugs or ear defenders.
I
~
Noise levels can be reduced (attenuated) by up to 20 decibels using ear plugs and 40 decibels
,. using ear muffs. However, using ear protection will tend to adversely interfere with verbal
communication. Despite this, it must be used consistently and as instructed to be effective.
It is good practice to reduce noise levels at source, or move noise away from workers.
I
~
Often this is not a practical option in the aviation maintenance environment. Hearing protection
[ -,
should always be used for noise, of any duration, above 115 dB, Referring again to Table 1,this
means that the aviation maintenance engineer will almost always need to use some form of
hearing protection when in reasonably close proximity (about 200-300m) to aircraft whose
engines are running.
r ,
!
Presbycusis
!
L.- Hearing deteriorates naturally as one grows older. This is known as presbycusis. This affects
ability to hear high pitch sounds first, and may occur gradually from the 30 's onwards. When
r •
this natural decline is exacerbated by Noise Induced Hearing Loss, it can obviously occur rather
sooner.
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-19
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
r' on page 2 of this chapter. (C) r.nnvrinht ?01 n
Integrated Training System "I
Designed in association with the , J
club66pro,co,uk question practice aid
It is very important that the aircraft maintenance engineer understands the limited ability of the
ears to protect themselves from damage due to excessive noise. Even though engineers should
be given appropriate hearing protection and trained in its use, it is up to individuals to ensure
1
, J
that they actually put this to good use. It is a misconception that the ears get used to constant
noise: if this noise is too loud, it will damage the ears gradually and insidiously.
, )
'__ .J
'- ;
l. j
'- _J
. ,
- j
Information Processing
,
,
. The previous sections have described the basic functions and limitations of two of the senses
used by aircraft maintenance engineers in the course of their work. This section examines the
way the information gathered by the senses is processed by the brain. The limitations of the
,. human information processing system are also considered.
,
L-
Information processing is the process of receiving information through the senses, analysing it
, '
and making it meaningful.
[
,
' An Information Processing Model
L-
Information processing can be represented as a model. This captures the main elements of the
I .
process, from receipt of information via the senses, to outputs such as decision making and
actions. One such model is shown in Figure 2.6.
--.;
"
Sight
L,. Smell
Sound
MUU
I ,
i
w
Feel
_ _ _ _i _
f,
w
Taste
1
['
I
I
~
I
, I
,,I I
~
I
r, '
I
I
'- I
,. I
i
Short Term long Term
L,
Memory Memory I
I
I
,
,
. I
I
'r
Feedback I
- ---- - -J
I' Figure 2.6: A functional model of human information processing
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-21
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. (E) r.nnvrinht 2010
, J
[ Attention can be thought of as the concentration of mental effort on sensory or mental events.
Although attention can move very quickly from one item to another, it can only deal with one
item at a time. Attention can take the form of:
• selective attention,
• divided attention,
• focused attention
• sustained attention. , ,
Selective attention occurs when a person is monitoring several sources of input, with greater
attention being given to one or more sources which appear more important. A person can be
consciously attending to one source whilst still sampling other sources in the background,
Psychologists refer to this as the 'cocktail party effect' whereby you can be engrossed in a
conversation with one person but your attention is temporarily diverted if you overhear your
name being mentioned at the other side of the room, even though you were not aware of
listening in to other people's conversations. Distraction is the negative side of selective
attention. I i
Divided attention is common in most work situations, where people are required to do more
than one thing at the same time. Usually, one task suffers at the expense of the other, more so
if they are similar in nature. This type of situation is also sometimes referred to as time sharing.
Focused attention is merely the skill of focusing one's attention upon a single source and
avoiding distraction.
Sustained attention as its name implies, refers to the ability to maintain attention and remain
alert over long periods of time, often on one task. Most of the research has been carried out in
connection with monitoring radar displays, but there is also associated research which has
concentrated upon inspection tasks.
Attention is influenced by arousal level and stress. This can improve attention or damage it
depending on the circumstances.
Perception involves the organisation and interpretation of sensory data in order to make it
meaningful, discarding non-relevant data, i.e. transforming data into information. Perception is a ,
:;
l ;
2-22 Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
,. , Integrated Training System
I Designed in association with the
'-
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
highly sophisticated mechanism and requires existing knowledge and experience to know what
data to keep and what to discard, and how to associate the data in a meaningful manner.
Perception can be defined as the process of assembling sensations into a useable mental
representation of the world. Perception creates faces, melodies, works of art, illusions, etc. out
c • of the raw material of sensation.
!
I
'-
Examples of the perceptual process:
1 the image formed on the retina is inverted and two dimensional, yet we see the world the
- right way up and in three dimensions;
r 2 if the head is turned, the eyes detect a constantly changing pattern of images, yet we
! perceive things around us to have a set location, rather than move chaotically.
'-
,,
Decision Making
Having recognised coherent information from the stimuli reaching our senses, a course of action
has to be decided upon. In other words decision making occurs.
,. We are not usually fully aware of the processes and information which we use to make a
decision. Tools can be used to assist the process of making a decision. For instance, in aircraft
L maintenance engineering, many documents (e.g. maintenance manuals, fault diagnosis
manuals), and procedures are available to supplement the basic decision making skills of the
: '
individual. Thus, good decisions are based on knowledge supplemented by written information
and procedures, analysis of observed symptoms, performance indications, etc. It can be
dangerous to believe that existing knowledge and prior experience will always be sufficient in
every situation as will be shown in the section entitled 'Information Processing Limitations '.
L
[' ; Finally, once a decision has been made, an appropriate action can be carried out. Our senses
I
I receive feedback of this and its result. This helps to improve knowledge and refine future
'-'
judgment by learning from experience.
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-23
r . governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © r.nnvrinht ?01 n
L J
I
Memory •__ .i
Memory is critical to our ability to act consistently and to learn new things. Without memory, we
could not capture a 'stream' of information reaching our senses, or draw on past experience and
apply this knowledge when making decisions.
Memory can be considered to be the storage and retention of information, experiences and
knowledge, as well as the ability to retrieve this information.
Short term memory receives a proportion of the information received into sensory stores, and ,:
allows us to store information long enough to use it (hence the idea of 'working memory '). It can
store only a relatively small amount of information at one time, i.e. 5 to 9 (often referred to as 7
±2) items of information, for a short duration, typically 10 to 20 seconds. As the following
example shows, capacity of short term memory can be enhanced by splitting information in to
'chunks' (a group of related items).
A telephone number, e.g. 01222555234, can be stored as 11 discrete digits, in which case it is • J
unlikely to be remembered. Alternatively, it can be stored in chunks of related information, e.g.
in the UK, 01222 may be stored as one chunk, 555 as another, and 234 as another, using only .., ,
I
3 chunks and therefore, more likely to be remembered. In mainland Europe, the same - j
telephone number would probably be stored as 01 2225 55 23 4, using 6 chunks. The size of
the chunk will be determined by the individual's familiarity with the information (based on prior
experience and context), thus in this example, a person from the UK might recognise 0208 as
the code for London, but a person from mainland Europe might not.
The duration of short term memory can be extended through rehearsal (mental repetition of the
information) or encoding the information in some meaningful manner (e.g. associating it with
something as in the example above). .'" ,
The capacity of long-term memory appears to be unlimited. It is used to store information that
is not currently being used, including:
..,
I
" ,i
2-24 Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations
Use and/or disclosure is
ITS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
" j
, '
Integrated Training System
!
,
Designed in association with the
c.--
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
\ '
• knowledge of the physical world and objects within it and how these behave;
• personal experiences;
, ' • beliefs about people, social norms, values, etc.;
i
L....,
• motor programmes, problem solving skills and plans for achieving various activities;
• abilities, such as language comprehension.
, '
, '
• Semantic memory refers to our store of general, factual knowledge about the world,
such as concepts, rules, one's own language, etc. It is information that is not tied to
where and when the knowledge was originally acquired.
• Episodic memory refers to memory of specific events, such as our past experiences
(including people, events and objects). We can usually place these things within a certain
,, ,
context. It is believed that episodic memory is heavily influenced by a person's
expectations of what should have happened, thus two people's recollection of the same
event can differ.
w Summary
( ,
Working Memory
Can only remember 7 unrelated items
Last for about 10 to 20 Seconds
( :
Motor Programmes
,. Automatic e.g Driving
!'
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-25
, ' governed by the statement
on oaoe 2 of this chapter.
TIS Integrated Training System
eEl r.nnvrinht ?01 n
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Motor Programmes
If a task is performed often enough, it may eventually become automatic and the required skills
and actions are stored in long term memory. These are known as motor programmes and are
ingrained routines that have been established through practice. The use of a motor programme
reduces the load on the central decision maker. An often quoted example is that of driving a car:
at first, each individual action such as gear changing is demanding, but eventually the separate
actions are combined into a motor programme and can be performed with little or no ! j
awareness.
These motor programmes allow us to carry out simultaneous activities, such as having a ~ .J
Situation Awareness
Although not shown explicitly in Figure 8, the process of attention, perception and judgment
should result in awareness of the current situation.
Situation awareness is the synthesis of an accurate and up-to-date 'mental model' of one's
environment and state, and the ability to use this to make predictions of possible future states.
Situation awareness has traditionally been used in the context of the flight deck to describe the (
,
j
pilot's awareness of what is going on around him, e.g. where he is geographically, his
~
orientation in space, what mode the aircraft is in, etc. In the maintenance engineering context, it ,
refers to:
• the perception of important elements, e.g. seeing loose bolts or missing parts, hearing
information passed verbally; \ ;
• the comprehension of their meaning, e.g. why is it like this? Is this how it should be?
• the projection of their status into the future, e.g. future effects on safety, schedule, ,
..
airworthiness. ~
An example is an engineer seeing (or perceiving) blue streaks on the fuselage. His
comprehension may be that the lavatory fill cap could be missing or the drainline leaking. If his
situation awareness is good, he may appreciate that such a leak could allow blue water to
freeze, leading to airframe or engine damage. " i
• j
As with decision making, feedback improves situation awareness by informing us of the .,,
accuracy of our mental models and their predictive power. The ability to project system status
backward, to determine what events may have led to an observed system state, is also very
important in aircraft maintenance engineering, as it allows effective fault finding and diagnostic
behaviour.
, .J
:' Situation awareness for the aircraft maintenance engineer can be summarised as:
,, . This suggests that in aircraft maintenance engineering, the entire team needs to have situation
[
'-
awareness - not just of what they are doing individually, but of their colleagues' activities as
well.
, . Once we have formed a mental model of a situation, we often seek information which will
I
L confirm this model and, not consciously, reject information which suggests that this model is
incorrect.
! .
There are many well-known visual 'illusions' which illustrate the limits of human perception.
Figure 2.8 shows how the perceptual system can be misled into believing that one line is longer
!. than the other, even though a ruler will confirm that they are exactly the same.
I '
)>>--------c
I Figure 2.8: The Muller-Lyer Illusion
I
'-
r •
i
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-27
governed by the statement TTS Integrated Training System
on oaoe 2 of this chapter. CCl r.nnvrinht ?01 0
,j
Figure 2.9 illustrates that we can perceive the same thing quite differently (i.e. the letter "B" or
the number "13"). This shows the influence of context on our information processing.
~
,
~-'\., 1:1, C:, I:>, I:, ~== ,
l_ J
IC», 11,12,13,1:4-
,- )
,,:,'~
. <' ::H, ,'>
i, ',BIRD 'ii
.. :!lITHE "-
THE HArm i,
At first, most people tend to notice nothing wrong with the sentence. Our perceptual system
sub-consciously rejects the additional "THE". , ,
")
As an illustration of how expectation, can affect our judgment, the same video of a car accident
was shown to two groups of subjects. One group was told in advance that they were to be .. ;
shown a video of a car crash; the other was told that the car had been involved in a 'bump'.
Both groups were asked to judge the speed at which the vehicles had collided. The first group
assessed the speed as significantly higher than the second group.
Expectation can also affect our memory of events. The study outlined above was extended such
that subjects were asked, a week later, whether they recalled seeing glass on the road after the , j
collision. (There was no glass). The group who had been told that they would see a crash,
recalled seeing glass; the other group recalled seeing no glass.
,- j
i
i
c J
~
,
, ,
2-28 Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
i
,
L.
i
I ,
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
L
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
It is generally better to use manuals and temporary aides-memoires rather than to rely upon
memory, even in circumstances where the information to be remembered or recalled is
relatively simple. For instance, an aircraft maintenance engineer may think that he will
{ .
i. remember a torque setting without writing it down, but between consulting the manual and
L. walking to the aircraft (possibly stopping to talk to someone on the way), he may forget the
setting or confuse it (possibly with a different torque setting appropriate to a similar task with
r •
which he is more familiar). Additionally, if unsure of the accuracy of memorised information, an
I
~ aircraft maintenance engineer should seek to check it, even if this means going elsewhere to do
so. Noting something down temporarily can avoid the risk of forgetting or confusing information.
! •
i However, the use of a personal note book to capture such information on a permanent basis
L.... can be dangerous, as the information in it may become out-of-date.
In the B737 double engine oil loss incident, the MIB report stated:
"Once the Controller and fitter had got to T2 and found that this supportive material [Task Cards
,r •
and AMM extracts] was not available in the workpack, they would have had to retum to Base
!
'-- Engineering or to have gone over to the Line Maintenance office to get it. It would be, in some
measure, understandable for them to have a reluctance to re-cross the exposed apron area on
a winter's night to obtain a description of what they were fairly confident they knew anyway.
However, during the course of the night, both of them had occasion to retum to the Base
Maintenance hangar a number of times before the task had been completed. Either could,
therefore, have referred to or even drawn the task descriptive papers before the job was signed
off. The question that should be addressed, therefore, is whether there might be any factors
other than overconfidence in their memories, bad judgment or idleness which would dispose
! them to pass up these opportunities to refresh their memories on the proper and complete
L. procedures."
i '
!
~
, ,
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-29
( . governed by the statement
on page 2 of this chapter.
TIS Integrated Training System
(C) r.nnvrinht ?01 n
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the : _j
c!ub66pro,co.uk question practice aid
~
. I
Summary · )
i :
•. ,J
lVIecb:mism
peJ.·cei·ved
~timuli ShOl't
--~~~
Cellh:ru
, i
.... ."'1'
(Single Channel)
,j
.'
- j
I
L
L heights is a feature of this trade. Problems associated with physical access are not uncommon.
Maintenance engineers and technicians often have to access, and work in, very small spaces
,I '. (e.g. in fuel tanks), cramped conditions (such as beneath flight instrument panels, around
rudder pedals), elevated locations (on cherry-pickers or staging), sometimes in uncomfortable
climatic or environmental conditions (heat, cold, wind, rain, noise).This can be aggravated by
·I, ' aspects such as poor lighting or having to wear breathing apparatus. The physical environments
associated with these problems are examined further in Chapter 5.
r '
l
Physical Access and Claustrophobia
,.
There are many circumstances where people may experience various levels of physical or
L psychological discomfort when in an enclosed or small space, which is generally considered to
be quite normal. When this discomfort becomes extreme, it is known as claustrophobia.
r '
I
It is quite possible that susceptibility to claustrophobia is not apparent at the start of
employment. It may come about for the first time because of an incident when working within a
r\ confined space, e.g. panic if unable to extricate oneself from a fuel tank. If an engineer suffers
I an attack of claustrophobia, they should make their colleagues and supervisors aware so that if
L..
tasks likely to generate claustrophobia cannot be avoided, at least colleagues may be able to
,'
,
assist in extricating the engineer from the confined space quickly, and sympathetically.
Engineers should work in a team and assist one another if necessary, making allowances for
the fact that people come in all shapes and sizes and that it may be easier for one person to
access a space, than another. However, this should not be used as an excuse for an engineer
who has put on weight, to excuse himself from jobs which he would previously have been able
to do with greater ease!
·.
L..
Fear of Heights
Working at significant heights can also be a problem for some aircraft maintenance engineers,
especially when doing 'crown' inspections (top of fuselage, etc.).Some engineers may be quite
at ease in situations like these whereas others may be so uncomfortable that they are far more
I" '
, ! concerned about the height, and holding on to the access equipment, than they are about the
L job in hand. In such situations, it is very important that appropriate use is made of harnesses
and safety ropes. These will not necessarily remove the fear of heights, but will certainly help to
,,
reassure the engineer and allow him to concentrate on the task in hand. The FAA's hfskyway
iL.. website provides practical guidance to access equipment when working at height. Ultimately, if
an engineer finds working high up brings on phobic symptoms (such as severe anxiety and
,r . panic), they should avoid such situations for safety's sake. However, as with claustrophobia,
support from team members can be helpful.
• •
Shortly before the Aloha accident, during maintenance, the inspector needed ropes attached to
the rafters of the hangar to prevent falling from the aircraft when it was necessary to inspect
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.2 Human Performance and Limitations 2-31
governed by the statement TTS Integrated Training System
r ' on paqe 2 of this chapter. © Cnnvriaht 2010
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
rivet lines on top of the fuselage. Although unavoidable, this would not have been conducive to
ensuring that the inspection was carried out meticulously (nor was it, as the subsequent
accident investigation revealed). The NTSB investigation report stated:
,
"Inspection of the rivets required inspectors to climb on scaffolding and move along the upper ,"
fuselage carrying a bright light with them; in the case of an eddy current inspection, the ~
,
inspectors needed a probe, a meter, and a light. At times, the inspector needed ropes attached
to the rafters of the hangar to prevent falling from the airplane when it was necessary to inspect
rivet lines on top of the fuselage. Even if the temperatures were comfortable and the lighting
was good, the task of examining the area around one rivet after another for signs of minute
cracks while standing on scaffolding or on top of the fuselage is very tedious. After examining
more and more rivets and finding no cracks, it is natural to begin to expect that cracks will not
be found."
Managers and supervisors should attempt to make the job as comfortable and secure as
reasonably possible (e.g. providing knee pad rests, ensuring that staging does not wobble, l j
providing ventilation in enclosed spaces, etc.) and allow for frequent breaks if practicable.
Other Phobias
There is a name for almost every fear. Some rare, others are common, many are irrational, but
many are rational fears. There are far too many to list here. · J
I
I
· j
I
• J
· ,i
1---.:
[ ,
,
i,
l-
[
,
,
i
l-
I '
I
l-
, TTS Integ rated
r .
,
l-
Training System
i '
,
,
'-
! '
Module 9
I '
!
'-
w
,
Human Factors
, I
r
I
I
9.3 Social Psychology
I
'-
f '
:
~
( :
,
( ,
Copyright Notice , I
© Copyright. All worldwide rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, ,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any other means whatsoever: i.e. ·· ~,
photocopy, electronic, mechanical recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of
Total Training Support Ltd.
LEVEL 1
• A familiarisation with the prinCipal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
• A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• An ability to apply that knowledge. , ,
Objectives:
• The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the , )
subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures. ,
"
, )
LEVEL 3
• A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive '.
i
;
manner.
Objectives:
• The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects. I
I
, 0
• The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
,
• The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject. I
• The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics , )
• i
, ,
L Table of Contents
'-'
Chapter 9.3 Social Psychology 5
The Social Environment 5
'- Responsibility: Individual and Group 6
Motivation and De-motivation 9
Introduction 9
~
External and Internal Motivation 9
Reward and Punishment: Effects on Behaviour 10
r '
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs 11
i
u De-motivation 12
r '
Peer Pressure 15
Experiments in Conformity 15
l-' Countering Peer Pressure and Conformity 16
Culture Issues 17
Safety Culture 18
~ Social Culture 19
Engineering a Just Culture (Dr. Reason) 20
The Blame Cycle 22
David Marx Scenarios 25
The Substitution Test 27
The Blame Scale 28
I Summary 28
c....
Personality Types 29
Five Factor Model 29
"Accident Prone" 30
Team Working 31
[ , The Concept of a Team 31
i Some Advantages and Disadvantages of Team Working 31
l-' Important Elements of Team Working 32
,, '. Management, Supervision and Leadership 35
The Management Role 35
u The Supervisory Role 36
r -1
Characteristics of a Leader 37
,
c..,
Maintenance Resource Management (MRM) 39
CRM and MRM 39
[ 1
The Dirty Dozen 41
i '
Peer pressure;
, i
)
'Culture' issues;
Team working;
, J
r;
,
-,
'. J
, !
. j
". j
r ' Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
f .
I •
I.
( '.
i
,
~
,f, .
Organisation
r"
! -,
I
This is called the organisational culture. They will have their own company philosophy, , I
policies, procedures, selection and training criteria, and quality assurance methods. Culture will
be discussed further in a separate section in this chapter.
The impact of the organisation may be positive or negative. Organisations may encourage their
employees (both financially and with career incentives), and take notice of problems that their
.,,
engineers encounter, attempting to learn from these and make changes where necessary or
possible. On the negative side, the organization may exert pressure on its engineers to get work
done within certain timescales and within certain budgets. At times, individuals may feel that
these conflict with their ability to sustain the quality of their work. These organisational
stresses may lead to problems of poor industrial relations, high turnover of staff, increased
absenteeism, and most importantly for the aviation industry, more incidents and accidents due
to human error.
Being an aircraft maintenance engineer is a responsible job. Clearly, the engineer plays a part
in the safe and efficient passage of the travelling public when they use aircraft.
• J
If someone is considered responsible, they are liable to be called to account as being in charge
or control of, or answerable for something.
Within aircraft maintenance, responsibility should be spread across all those who playa part in .,
the activity. This ranges from the accountable manager who formulates policy, through ,
I
j
management that set procedures, to supervisors, teams of engineers and individuals within
those teams. Flight crew also playa part as they are responsible for carrying out preflight .-,,
checks and walkarounds and highlighting aircraft faults to maintenance personnel.
any
emphasis upon personal responsibility, is that this may overlook the importance of working
: !
together as a cohesive team or group to achieve goals. , "
In practice, aircraft maintenance engineers are often assigned to groups or teams in the ,
workplace. These may be shift teams, or smaller groups within a shift. A team may be made up · )
of various engineering trades, or be structured around aircraft types or place of work (e.g. a
particular hangar). Although distinct tasks may be assigned to individuals within a team, the
responsibility for fulfilling overall goals would fall on the entire team.
· )
, '
!
All individuals, regardless of their role, grade or qualifications should work in a responsible
,,
( \
manner. This includes not only Licensed Aircraft Engineers (LAE's), but non-licensed staff,
G Leaflet 15-2 (previously published as Airworthiness Notice No, 3) details the certification
( , responsibilities of LAE's, This document states that "The certifying engineer shall be responsible
I for ensuring that work is performed and recorded in a satisfactory manner.,,",
'-
The disadvantage of group responsibility is that it can potentially act against safety, with
r -, responsibility being devolved to such an extent that no-one feels personally responsible for
safety (referred to as diffusion of responsibility), Here, an individual, on his own, may take
action but, once placed within a group situation, he may not act if none of the other group
r I
members do so, each member of the group or team assuming that 'someone else will do it',
I This is expanded upon further in the section on peer pressure later in this chapter,
'-
Social psychologists have carried out experiments whereby a situation was contrived in which
someone was apparently in distress, and noted who came to help, If a person was on their own,
they were far more likely to help than if they were in a pair or group, In the group situation, each
r' person felt that it was not solely his responsibility to act and assumed that someone else would
do so,
, '
Other recognised phenomena associated with group or team working and responsibility for
L decisions and actions which aircraft maintenance engineers should be aware of are:
( 1
Intergroup Conflict in which situations evolve where a small group may act cohesively as a
team, but rivalries may arise between this team and others (e,g, between engineers and
r -,
planners, between shifts, between teams at different sites, etc,), This may have implications in
terms of responsibility, with teams failing to share responsibility between them, This is
particularly pertinent to change of responsibility at shift handovers, where members of the
,,
outgoing shift may feel no 'moral' responsibility for waiting for the incoming shift members to
arrive and giving a verbal handover in support of the written information on the workcards or
task sheets, whereas they might feel such responsibility when handing over tasks to others
within their own shift.
Group Polarisation is the tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than
Cj
the individual members' initial positions. At times, group polarization results in more cautious I
I
decisions. Alternatively, in other situations, a group may arrive at a course of action that is ,~ .I
riskier than that which any individual member might pursue. This is known as risky shift.
Cj
Another example of group polarisation is groupthink in which the desire of the group to reach I
unanimous agreement overrides any individual impulse to adopt proper, rational (and '. j
Social Loafing has been coined to reflect the tendency for some individuals to work less hard
on a task when they believe others are working on it. In other words, they consider that their
own efforts will be pooled with that of other group members and not seen in isolation. '.
l J
• Social Loafing
• Tendency for some individuals to
work less hard on a task when
they believe others are working
,
on It. ,
· j
In other words, they consider that
their own efforts win be pooled
with that of other group members
and not seen in isolation.
,
· )
l. J
· ,
r-
I
l ,
", J
3-8 Module 9.3 Social Psychology Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
i
\-
( .
I
Motivation can be thought of as a basic human drive that arouses, directs and sustains all
human behaviour. Generally we say a person is motivated if he is taking action to achieve
something.
( .
Motivation is usually considered to be a positive rather than a negative force in that it stimulates
one to achieve various things. However just because someone is motivated, this does not mean
I .
• to say that they are doing the right thing. Many criminals are highly motivated for instance .
Motivation is difficult to measure and predict. We are all motivated by different things, for
example, an artist might strive over many months to complete a painting that he may never sell,
1, ;
whereas a businessman may forfeit all family life in pursuit of financial success.
G
With respect to aviation safety, being appropriately motivated is vital. Ideally, aircraft
,I ' maintenance engineers ought to be motivated to work in a safe and efficient manner. However,
,~
many factors may cause conflicting motivations to override this ideal. For instance, the
( , motivation of some financial bonus, or de-motivation of working outdoors in extreme cold
weather might lead to less consideration of safety and increase the likelihood of risk taking,
corner cutting, violating procedures and so on. Aircraft maintenance engineers should be aware
! .
of conflicting motivations that impinge on their actions and attempt to examine their motivations
,
for working in a certain way.
~
r .
i
'--'
( \
punishments have negative effects: they don't lead to improved behaviour and they make
people resentful. ::i
...J
Immediate Delayed
Positive Doubtful
Reward ,....,
effects effects ,I
'. ;
Doubtful Negative
Punishment effects effects
The cells labelled 'doubtful effects' mean that, in each case, there are opposing forces at work. . J
Hence, the results are uncertain.
,
~ .J
i
, J
• those that ensure survival by satisfying basic physical and psychological needs;
• those that help us to realise our full potential in life known as self-actualisation needs
(fulfilling ambitions, etcl
Figure 3.4 shows the hypothetical hierarchical nature of the needs we are motivated to satisfy.
The theory is that the needs lower down the hierarchy are more primitive or basic and must be
satisfied before we can be motivated by the higher needs. For instance, you will probably find it
harder to concentrate on the information in this document if you are very hungry (as the lower
,. level physiological need to eat predominates over the higher level cognitive need to gain
L knowledge). There are always exceptions to this, such as the mountain climber who risks his life
in the name of adventure. The higher up the hierarchy one goes, the more difficult it becomes to
achieve the need. High level needs are often long-term goals that have to be accomplished in a
series of steps.
,,
I
L
Self-
I . Actualization .
• I Realizing your full
I
~ potenti~I" becoming
everything one is capable
ii/becoming." ••
,. Physiological Needs
Food, Drink, O~ygen,Temri"ratutBRe.gulation, .Rest, Activity, Sex
~ j
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
An aircraft maintenance engineer will fulfill lower level needs by earning money to buy food, pay
for a home and support a family. They may well be motivated by middle level needs in their
work context (e.g. social groups at work, gaining status and recognition). It is noteworthy that for
shift workers, tiredness may be a more powerful motivator than a higher order need (such as
personal satisfaction to get the job done in time or accurately). l. .. .\
An interesting experiment on motivation was carried out in 1924 at the Hawthorne Works of the
Western Electric Company in Chicago. Here, the management altered various factors such as
rest periods, lighting levels, working hours, etc. and each time they did so, performance
improved, even when the apparent improvements were taken away! This suggested that it was
not the improvements themselves which were causing the increased production rates, but
rather the fact that the staff felt that management were taking notice of them and were
concerned for their welfare. This phenomenon is known as the Hawthorne effect.
l )
De-motivation
People who are de-motivated lack motivation, either intrinsically or through a failure of their
management to motivate the staff who work for them. De-motivated people tend to demonstrate
the following characteristics:
• apathy and indifference to the job, including reduced regard for safety whilst working;
• a poor record of time keeping and high absenteeism;
• an exaggeration of the effects/difficulties encountered in problems, disputes and
grievances;
• a lack of co-operation in dealing with problems or difficulties;
• unjustified resistance to change.
,
'. )
However, care should be taken when associating these characteristics with lack of motivation,
since some could also be signs of stress. ~
•
,
J
There is much debate as to the extent to which financial reward is a motivator. There is a school
of thought which suggests that whilst lack of financial reward is a demotivator, the reverse is not i :
necessarily true. The attraction of the extra pay offered to work a 'back to back shift' can be a ; j
strong motivator for an individual to ignore the dangers associated with working when tired.
The motivating effects of job security and the de-motivating impact of lack of job security is also
an area that causes much debate. The 'hire and fire' attitude of some companies can,
potentially, be a major influence upon safety, with real or perceived pressure upon individuals
affecting their performance and actions. It is important that maintenance engineers are
motivated by a desire to ensure safety (Maslow's 'self esteem/self respect'), rather than by a
,. J
3-12 Module 9.3 Social Psychology Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 201 0 on page 2 of this chapter.
( ,
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.cQ.uk question practice aid
fear of being punished and losing their job (Maslow's 'security'), It is possible that the "can do"
culture, which is evident in some areas of the industry, may be generated by the expectancy
, , that if individuals do not 'deliver', they will be punished (or even dismissed) and, conversely,
i those who do 'deliver' (whether strictly by the book or not, finding ways around lack of time,
spares or equipment) are rewarded and promoted, This is not motivation in the true sense but it
has its roots in a complex series of pressures and drives and is one of the major influences
upon human performance and human error in maintenance engineering.
( ,
, '
( .
1
'-
; 1
'-'
i .
f
,'
,roo'
~
,
,_ J
Intentionally Blank n
~.
,
~ _ --l
r .,
Peer Pressure
r , In the working environment of aircraft maintenance, there are many pressures brought to bear
on the individual engineer. We have already discussed the influence of the organisation, of
responsibility and motivational drives. In addition to these, there is the possibility that the aircraft
r • maintenance engineer will receive pressure at work from those that work with him. This is
i known as peer pressure.
'--'
r ' Peer pressure is the actual or perceived pressure which an individual may feel, to conform to
what he believes that his peers or colleagues expect.
For example, an individual engineer may feel that there is pressure to cut corners in order to get
an aircraft out by a certain time, in the belief that this is what his colleagues would do under
similar circumstances. There may be no actual pressure from management to cut corners, but
r •
subtle pressure from peers, e.g. taking the form of comments such as "You don't want to bother
checking the manual for that. You do it like this ... " would constitute peer pressure.
r •
Peer pressure thus falls within the area of conformity. Conformity is the tendency to allow
one's opinions, attitudes, actions and even perceptions to be affected by prevailing opinions,
attitudes, actions and perceptions.
r .
!
,. Experiments in Conformity
!
Asch carried out several experiments investigating the nature of conformity, in which he asked
people to judge which of lines A, B & C was the same length as line X. (see Figure 3.5). He
, . asked this question under different conditions:
I
L • where the individual was asked to make the judgment on his own;
• where the individual carried out the task after a group of 7-9 confederates of Asch had all
r
L judged that line A was the correct choice. Of course, the real participant did not know the
others were "stooges"
,.
I
f •
x A B c
r . B is the same length as X
Figure 3.5: Experiment to illustrate conformity (8. Asch 1951)
I .
i In the first condition, very few mistakes were made (as would be expected of such a simple task
c....,
with an obvious answer). In the latter condition, on average, participants gave wrong answers
,. on one third of the trials by agreeing with the confederate majority. Clearly, participants yielded
to group pressure and agreed with the incorrect 'group' finding (however, it is worth mentioning
r .
....,
that there were considerable individual differences: some participants never conformed, and . I
some conformed all the time). i
Further research indicated that conformity does not occur with only one confederate (as then it "i i
is a case of 'my word against yours'). However, it is necessary to have only three confederates "
to one real participant to attain the results that Asch found with 7- 9 confederates.
.,
The degree to which an individual's view is likely to be affected by conformity or peer pressure, ~,_
:
J
• culture (people from country x tend to conform more than those from country y);
• gender (men tend to conform less than women);
• self-esteem (a person with low self-esteem is likely to conform more);
, )
• familiarity of the individual with the subject matter (a person is more likely to conform to
the majority view if he feels that he knows less about the subject matter than they do);
• the expertise of the group members (if the individual respects the group or perceives
them to be very knowledgeable he will be more likely to conform to their views);
• the relationship between the individual and group members (conformity increases if the
individual knows the other members of the group, i.e. it is a group of peers).
Conformity is closely linked with 'culture' (described in the next section). It is highly relevant in
the aircraft maintenance environment where it can work for or against a safety culture,
depending on the attitudes of the existing staff and their influence over newcomers. In other
words, it is important for an organisation to engender a positive approach to safety throughout • i
their workforce, so that peer pressure and conformity perpetuates this. In this instance, peer
pressure is clearly a good thing. Too often, however, it works in reverse, with safety standards
gradually deteriorating as shift members develop practices which might appear to them to be l J
more efficient, but which erode safety. These place pressure, albeit possibly unwittingly, upon
new engineers joining the shift, to do likewise.
,, . .
Culture Issues
There can be a degree of mistrust of anything new in the workplace, (e.g. an individual joining a
company whose expertise has not yet been proven, or contracting out maintenance to another
company, etc.). There may be a tendency for groups within organisation and the organisation
itself to think that their own methods are the best and that others are not as good. This
[ viewpoint is known as the group's or organisation's culture.
'-
r .
, The culture of an organisation can be described as 'the way we do things here'. It is a group or
company norm.
~ Figure 3.6 indicates that there can be an overall organisational culture, and a number of
different 'sub-cultures', such as safety culture, professional/technical culture, etc.
It is possible for cultural differences to exist between sites or even between shifts within the
same organisation. The prevailing culture of the industry as a whole also influences individual
organisations.
( ,
SafetvCulture
i '
shifts/work
Technical
l Culture
I
of
L
Business Culture
Culture of the Aircraft Maintenance
Engineering Industry as a Whole
r •
Culture is not necessarily always generated or driven from the top of an organization (as one
might think), but this is the best point from which to influence the culture.
,.
r
Safety Culture
The ICAO Human factors Digest No. 10, "Human Factors, Management and Organisation" r-")
(Circular 247), discusses corporate culture and the differences between safe and unsafe I
! !
corporate cultures.
ICAO HF Digest 10 describes a safety culture as "a set of beliefs, norms, attitudes, roles and
,"--,j
social and technical practices concerned with minimising exposure of employees, managers,
customers and members of the general public to conditions considered dangerous or
hazardous" I
. J
Gary Eiff from Purdue University discusses safety culture in his paper "Organizational Culture ,~
and its Effect on Safety". He suggests that "A safety culture exists only within an organisation . _ .J
where each individual employee, regardless of their position, assumes an active role in error
prevention", stressing that "Safety cultures do not ... spring to life simply at the declaration of ,-,
I
corporate leaders". !
The culture of an organisation can best be judged by what is done rather than by what is said.
Organisations may have grand 'mission statements' concerning safety but this does not indicate
that they have a good safety culture unless the policies preached at the top are actually put into
practise at the lower levels. It may be difficult to determine the safety culture of an organisation
by auditing the procedures and paperwork; a better method is to find out what the majority of • J
the staff actually believe and do in practice.
A method for measuring attitudes to safety has been developed by the Health and Safety
Executive utilising a questionnaire approach. Examples of the statements which employees are
asked the extent to which they agree are:
The results are scored and analysed to give an indication of the safety culture of the 'i
organisation, broken down according to safety commitment, supervision, work conditions,
logistic support, etc. In theory, this enables one organisation to be objectively compared with
another.
,!
-j
I
,.
Professor James Reason describes the key components of a safety culture, summarised as
L follows:
r •
• The 'engine' that continues to propel the system towards the goal of maximum safety
L health, regardless of the leadership's personality or current commercial concerns;
r'
• Not forgetting to be afraid;
• Creating a safety information system that collects, analyses and disseminates
information from incidents and near-misses as well as from regular proactive checks on
the system's vital signs;
• A good reporting culture, where staff are willing to report near-misses;
• A just culture - an atmosphere of trust, where people are encouraged, even rewarded, for
providing essential safety related information - but in which they are clear about where
L the line must be drawn between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour;
• A flexible culture;
!- • Respect for the skills, experience and abilities of the workforce and first line supervisors;
• Training investment;
• A learning culture - the willingness and the competence to draw the right conclusions
from its safety information system, and the will to implement major reforms when their
need is indicated.
r •
I
'- Social Culture
The influence of social culture (an individual's background or heritage) can be important in
i' determining how an individual integrates into an organisational culture. The wayan individual
L behaves outside an organisation is likely to have a bearing on how they behave within it.
Internal pressures and conflicts within groups at work can be driven by underlying social cultural
differences (e.g. different nationalities, different political views, different religious beliefs, etc.).
This is an extremely complex subject, however, and in-depth discussion is beyond the scope of
this text.
I-
Whilst safety culture has been discussed from the organisational perspective, the responsibility
of the individual should not be overlooked. Ultimately, safety culture is an amalgamation of the
attitude, beliefs and actions of all the individuals working for the organisation and each person
should take responsibility for their own contribution towards this culture, ensuring that it is a
positive contribution rather than a negative one.
I;
An effective safety culture is an informed culture, one that knows where the 'edge' is without
having to fall over it. But incidents and accidents are still relatively rare. They are not enough to ,.-,
. I
steer by. To achieve that, we need people to report their errors and near misses. But they won't
i .1
do that unless they trust the system and its bosses. And they certainly won't confess their errors
if they get disciplined for it. So, an effective reporting culture depends upon having a just
culture. That is, an organisation in which people clearly understand where the line must be
drawn between acceptable and unacceptable actions. In short, a just culture lies at the heart of
a safe culture. ,.-,
i
Culture: A workable definition
Shared values (what is important) and beliefs (how things work) that interact with an ,
organization's structure and control systems to produce behavioural norms (the way we do , !
• Defences, barriers and safeguards take many different forms and are widely distributed
throughout the system.
• Perhaps the only factor that can have a systematic and far-reaching effect upon
defences (for good or ill) is the organisational culture.
There can be no doubt that it is extremely difficult to change adult attitudes directly. Think how
long it has taken to reduce the number of smokers to a relatively small group. It has taken
around 30 years to achieve this. Smokers have known throughout all of this time that smoking
could kill them. But this knowledge alone did not significantly change their behaviour. Now, most
"1
buildings have outlawed smoking. To satisfy their need, smokers have to indulge outside the !
front door or in dark dirty rooms set aside for the purpose. This practice has greatly reduced
their desire to smoke. They are also tired of being treated as pariahs. In short, changing
practices has changed attitudes. __ .1
I
,
, _J
3-20 Module 9.3 Social Psychology Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System govemed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter
,
L...
r ,
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
r ;
I
'
t
L... Figure 3.7: Getting people to change
,. Safety culture =Informed culture
[
'-
• An informed culture means not forgetting to be afraid in the absence of bad accidents.
• An informed culture means collecting data about incidents and near misses.
• An informed culture is one in which those who manage the system know where the
( ,
'edge' is without falling over it.
Above all else, a safe culture is one that does not forget to be afraid. In order to keep up the
, '
proper level of intelligent wariness, we need to understand the hazards and risks that beset our
!u operation. In short, we need to know where the 'edge' is. Many organisations do not discover
this until they fall over it. It is better to know in advance. But how do we find out? Aviation does
not have that many accidents, and, in aviation engineering, only the more dramatic incidents
i tend to get reported. We need people to tell us about their errors, near misses and free lessons.
I
L...
In short, we need to operate a reporting culture. NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System
(ASRS) has achieved this through clever social engineering--much of which has to do with the
issue of sanctions and immunity. Around the world, there are many other, confidential Human
Factors reporting schemes with similar objectives.
r But an informed culture can only grow from a just culture
IL...
, ; • An adequate reporting system depends on people reporting near misses, errors and
i
L...
incidents.
• But they won't do that if they don't trust the system.
• And they certainly won't do it if they are disciplined because of what they report.
,'
, '
even more
convinced
that .... ~
People seen to choose
errone ous course of
action ,
Deliberate actions
·
,...,
,· J
.'
,i
deserve sanctions
, ,
II:
Management view
",
l )
T
Why are we so inclined to blame people rather than situations? The answer comes in two parts: ~
• J
i
• The first of these is what psychologists call the 'fundamental attribution error'. When we
see or hear of someone performing less than adequately, we tend to attribute this to the
person's character or ability. We say he or she was silly, careless, stupid, incompetent,
reckless or thoughtless. But if we were to ask the person why they did it, they would
almost certainly tell you how the circumstances forced them to act that way. The truth, of !
course, lies somewhere in between. ,!
--;
• The second part of the answer relates to the 'illusion of free will'. It is this that makes the I
attribution error so fundamental to human nature. People, especially in western cultures, ~, j
place great value in the belief that they are free agents, the masters of their own fate.
They can become mentally ill when they are deprived of this sense of personal freedom
by illness, old age or enforced confinement. Feeling ourselves to be capable of free
choice naturally leads us to assume that other people are the same. They are also seen
as free agents, able to choose between right and wrong, and between correct and
erroneous courses of action. People are assumed to be the least constrained factor
causing an accident. Their actions are seen as more avoidable than situational
conditions. It is this, together with the illusion of free will, that drives the fruitless Blame
Cycle.
, .J
· J
· 1
<.,. j
3-22 Module 9.3 Social Psychology
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
,
L·
I '
i Avoiding the Blame Cycle
~
r • • Recognise that human actions are almost always affected by factors outside a person's
I control.
• Recognise that people cannot easily avoid those actions they did not intend in the first
( . place.
• Recognise that errors are consequences rather than causes. The beginning of search
rather than end.
r • • Recognise that in a well-trained and well-motivated workforce, situations are easier to fix
r
I than people.
'--'
( . Of course, people can behave carelessly and stupidly. We all do so at some time or another.
But a stupid or careless act does not necessarily make a stupid or careless person. Everyone is
capable of a wide range of actions, sometimes inspired and sometimes silly, but mostly
r . somewhere in between.
i
'--'
An important point to emphasise here is the third bullet about errors being consequences rather
than causes. Many investigations stop as soon as they have identified human errors. These are
then called the causes of the incident or accident. But the errors, just as much as their bad
outcomes, are consequences rather than causes. They are a chapter in a long history of prior
error-provoking factors. Finding errors, therefore, should mark the beginning rather than the end
, of the search for causal factors.
~
[
,
. Common sense would suggest that people are easier to fix than circumstances. People, after
L..-
I all, are capable of wide variability. They can be retrained, punished, advised or warned (it is
believed) in ways that will make them behave more appropriately in the future. But, in this
r , regard, common sense is wrong. Yes, we can change individual behaviour up to a point, but we
[
I
'-
cannot change human nature. And it is human nature to go wrong occasionally. Situations and
even organisations are actually easier to change than human nature. And that is where the
main focus of error management must lie: in changing the conditions that provoke errors rather
than trying to change humankind.
r •
Decades ago, most maintenance organisations were punitive cultures: people got punished if
I they caused damage to the aircraft without regard to the nature of the actions involved. In the
1980s, the phrase 'blame-free' culture came along. But that is equally inappropriate. Some
actions deserve punishment. The important thing that everyone must understand is where the
r, '
I line should be drawn between acceptable and unacceptable actions, between blameworthy and
'--' blameless behaviour.
r •
I
L
• Recklessness: involves taking a deliberate and unjustifiable risk. Mainly an issue for
criminal law.
The law identifies two kinds of actions: those that are merely negligent and those that are
reckless. The latter clearly deserve some kind of sanction, even dismissal.
Errors Vs violations?
c ,
• Should all unintended actions (errors) be exempt from disciplinary action?
• Should all deliberate violations be punished?
• Unfortunately, it's not as simple as that.
How do we draw a line between innocent negligence and deliberate recklessness? It is not
easy.
i
• It all depends on what the person was doing when the error or violation was committed. ,
c j
'
"
, ..1
, J
i
, J
,--,
,
, J
3-24 Module 9.3 Social Psychology
Use andfor disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
L
I
I
' Integrated Training System
t Designed in association with the
club66pro.ca.uk question practice aid
r '
I
David Marx, a former Boeing engineer who has taken a law degree, now spends a good deal of
his time helping aircraft maintenance organisations to establish fair and just disciplinary
I • systems. He argues that the important thing to determine is the nature of the underlying
conduct. What was the person doing when he/she made the error? What was his/her
motivation? Marx created the next two scenarios to help clarify the important issues.
r '
Scenario 1
Here a maintainer did everything he/she should have done to carry out a proper inspection. Yet
[' he/she still missed a dangerous crack.
Scenario 2
I .
• Both maintainers committed the same unintended error: missing the crack.
• But, in scenario 2, the maintainer's actions made this error far more likely.
• He/she deliberately engaged in behaviour that significantly and unjustifiably increased
the risk of error (recklessness).
On the face of it, the difference between the two scenarios is clear. The first person followed
L procedures, the second person deliberately failed to comply. In so doing, he/she greatly
increased the chances of missing a crack.
( 1
I
L
• But even that is too simple. Consider Scenario 3.
,
i
I
'-'
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.3 Social Psychology 3-25
governed by the statement
TIS Integrated Training System
on pace 2 of this chapter. © CODvriaht 2010
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
" i
J
by system problems.
Scenario 3 ~ _i
Again, this reiterates the distinction between deliberate short cuts and system-induced
violations. Many necessary violations happen because a person feels that some action is better .,
,I
than none, even though it does not comply with procedures.
Blameless
I
Sabotage, Substance abuse, System-induced violations, Negligent errors, :.. .1
, i
Figure 3.9: Drawing the line
, J
Figure 3.9 poses the question again: Where should we draw the line? David Marx's research
has shown that, in general, only about 10% of unsafe acts fall clearly into the culpable category.
The vast majority are blameless, and so could be safely reported--if the reporters really trusted
the system.
.
I. J
L
Integrated Training System
Designed in assodation with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
i, • Question to peers: 'Given the circumstances, could you be sure that you would not
'--
have made the same or a similar error?'
• If answer is 'no', then blame probably inappropriate.
• The best people can make the worst mistakes.
,
I
. Neil Johnston, an Aer Lingus captain, has come up with this very useful substitution test. After
I an unsafe act has been committed, the perpetrator's peers are asked whether or not it could
have happened to them. We all recognise human fallibility. We all know that we have made
mistakes in the past. If the peers say it could have happened to them, then the act is probably
blameless.
! . The history of maintenance-related accidents shows us very clearly that well-trained, well-
L intentioned and experienced people with blameless records can sometimes make the worst
mistakes. This means that maintenance errors are not just created by a few incompetent or
reckless people. Blaming individuals rarely leads to effective remedial action -- except, of
course, when blaming and then dismissing someone removes a dangerous 'cowboy' from the
work force.
,
~
[
I
,
,
[ .
,
~
[ .
I
!
~
, .
I
I '
I
r •
i '
L.
i
L
r •
t
I
KnoVii'ingly , .J
Pas 5 History
Were the _ NO --+- NO --. violating - NO -+- substitution ~ YES ~ of unsafe
actions safe operating test? acts?
as intended? procedures?
, ,~ NO l }
I YES
:' .-_-,>f,-_. YES
YES NO YES
t ,, Deficiencies
NO
Were procedures
available. workable ,:
" in training & \
,
selection or
1
Were the
intelligible and
correct?
'---'::'::,=::';,r--' :'
,
'
: inexperience?
NO
\
YES
Blameless
error but
Blameless
error
YES
Substance
\
Substance
abuse with I
Possible
reckless
violation
L_...._I
System-
induced
violation
Diminishing
abuse without mitigation
Sabotage, mitigation culpability ,...., ,
malevolent ,
damage, :. j
suicide, etc.
Summary
• A safety culture is an informed culture: one that knows where the 'edge' is without falling ,
" )
over it.
• An informed culture depends on trust. The workforce will not report errors and near
misses if they are punished for it. ,
I
J
• Thus a safety culture depends critically upon 'engineering' a just culture.
--,
By now, you should have a clear idea of the importance of disciplinary proceedings in shaping a ;i
,_ J
safe culture. The issue of justice (or apparent injustice) lies at the heart of aviation engineering
human factors. There are no black and white answers. Each organisation has to work out the --,
solutions for itself. But this is not an issue that can be either dodged or fudged. ,
\
,
, >
This module is rich in discussion material. How do these issues apply to your organisation. .,
,i
Experience has shown that people are happy to argue about these matters for many hours. ~ J
--,
!
l J
( ,
i
~
Personality Types
r '
• Openness - appreciation for art, emotion, adventure, unusual ideas, curiosity, and
( ,
variety of experience,
I
'- • Conscientiousness - a tendency to show self-discipline, act dutifully, and aim for
achievement; planned rather than spontaneous behaviour.
• Extraversion - energy, positive emotions, surgency, and the tendency to seek
stimulation and the company of others,
• Agreeableness - a tendency to be compassionate and cooperative rather than
suspicious and antagonistic towards others,
• Neuroticism - a tendency to experience unpleasant emotions easily, such as anger,
anxiety, depression, or vulnerability; sometimes called emotional instability,
[ '
When scored for individual feedback, these traits are frequently presented as percentile scores.
; , For example, a Conscientiousness rating in the 80th percentile indicates a relatively strong
sense of responsibility and orderliness, whereas an Extraversion rating in the 5th percentile
indicates an exceptional need for solitude and quiet.
Although these trait clusters are statistical aggregates, exceptions may exist on individual
personality profiles. On average, people who register high in Openness are intellectually
,. curious, open to emotion, interested in art, and willing to try new things. A particular individual,
however, may have a high overall Openness score and be interested in learning and exploring
new cultures. Yet he or she might have no great interest in art or poetry. Situational influences
also exist, as even extraverts may occasionally need time away from people.
[ ,
,,
, '
,'
I
, .
"Accident Prone"
Personality can be described along two personality dimensions lying at right angles to one
another. The traits listed in each cell show the characteristics associated with various
combinations of the two main personality dimensions.
Unstable Accident-prone?
l j
Moody Touchy
Anxious Reslless
,
Pessimistic Optimistic ,
Unsociable Aggressive
·.
·
Quiet Active
Introverts f-----4-----~ Extraverts
~_ ,I
Passive Sociable
Careful Outgoing
Thoughtful Lively
Controlled Carefree
Reliable Leadership ~. )
Stable
, )
·,
...
, J
, .'
( ,
L. Team Working
( ,
I
~
give anything but a flavour of this.
i ' Teams may comprise a number of individuals working together towards one shared goal.
I
Alternatively, they may consist of a number of individuals working in parallel to achieve one
common goal. Teams generally have a recognised leader and one or more follower(s). Teams
[ ,
need to be built up and their identity as a team needs to be maintained in some way.
A team could be a group of engineers working on a specific task or the same aircraft, a group
i .
working together on the same shift, or a group working in the same location or site. There are
i
'-' natural teams within the aircraft maintenance environment. The most obvious is the supervisor
and the engineers working under his supervision. A team could also be a Licensed Aircraft
Engineer (LAE) and unlicensed engineers working subject to his scrutiny. A team may well
comprise engineers of different technical specialities (e.g. sheeUmetal structures,
electrical/electronics/avionics, hydraulics, etc.).
There has been a great deal of work carried out on teamwork, in particular "Crew Resource
, . Management (CRM)" in the cockpit context and, more recently, "Maintenance Resource
I
I Management (MRM)" in the maintenance context. The ICAO Human Factors Digest No. 12
L..
"Human Factors in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection" (ICAO Circular 253), includes a
Chapter on team working, to which the reader is directed for further information. MRM is
addressed separately (section 8) since it covers more than just teamwork.
i
W
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.3 Social Psychology 3-31
govemed by the statement TTS Integrated Training System
on caoe 2 of this chapter. © CODvriaht 2010
Integrated Training System .-,
I
Designed in association with the , ;
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
team identity and encourage pride in the product of a team. Team identity also has the
advantage that a group of engineers know one another's capabilities (and weaknesses). , )
If work has to be handed over to another group or team (e.g. shift handover), this can cause
problems if it is not handled correctly. If one team of engineers consider that their diligence (i.e.
taking the trouble to do something properly and carefully) is a waste of time because an
incoming team's poor performance will detract from it, then it is likely that diligence will become
more and more rare over time.
Communication
Communication is essential for exchanging work-related information within the team.
For example, a team leader must ensure that a team member has not just heard an instruction,
but understood what is meant by it. A team member must highlight problems to his colleagues
and/or team leader. Furthermore, it is important to listen to what others say. This is covered in
greater depth in Chapter 7.
Co-operation
'Pulling together' is inherent in the smooth running of a team. Fairness and openness within the , j
team encourage cohesiveness and mutual respect. Disagreements must be handled sensitively
by the team leader.
, ,
Co-ordination
Co-ordination is required within the team to ensure that the team leader knows what his group
members are doing. This includes delegation of tasks so that all the resources within the team
are utilised. Delegated tasks should be supervised and monitored as required. The team leader
must ensure that no individual is assigned a task beyond his capabilities. Further important
aspects of co-ordination are agreement of responsibilities (i.e. who should accomplish which " l
tasks and within what timescale), and prioritisation of tasks.
l )
c.i
, J
, ,
i
~. J
i
3-32 Module 9.3 Social Psychology Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro,co.uk question practice aid
Mutual Support
1. Mutual support is at the heart of the team's identity. The team leader must engender this
in his team. For instance, if mistakes are made, these should be discussed and corrected
- constructively.
(
i
2. It is worth noting that in many companies, line engineers tend to work as individuals
'- whereas base engineers tend to work in teams. This may be of significance when an
engineer who normally works in a hangar, finds himself working on the line, or vice versa.
(
This was the case in the Boeing 737 incident involving double engine oil pressure loss,
'- where the Base Controller took over a job from the Line Maintenance engineer, along
with the line maintenance paperwork. The line maintenance paperwork is not designed
T
for recording work with a view to a handover, and this was a factor when the job was
'-
handed over from the Line engineer to the Base Controller.
r '
L
, ,
( .
·
L
I .
I
'-
( .
·.
r .
I
" 1
l J
", I
, !
Intentionally Blank
"
I
~ j
,
~. J
(. )
I .
Managers and supervisors have a key role to play in ensuring that work is carried out safely. It
( . is no good instilling the engineers and technicians with 'good safety practice' concepts, if these
i are not supported by their supervisors and managers.
i .
L
,.
,
r
f'
L
I
L
i
The Supervisory Role ... _J
but will also have a good appreciation of individual engineer's strengths and weaknesses,
together with an appreciation of the norms and safety culture of the group which he supervises.
l )
It is mainly his job to prevent unsafe norms from developing, and to ensure that good safety
practices are maintained. There can be a risk however, that the Supervisor becomes drawn
down the same cultural path as his team without realising. It is good practice for a Supervisor to
step back from the day-to-day work on occasion and to try to look at his charges' performance
objectively.
.- )
It can be difficult for supervisory and management staff to strike the right balance between
carrying out their supervisory duties and maintaining their engineering skills and knowledge ,
(and appropriate authorisations), and they may get out of practice. In the UK Air Accidents ! r
Investigation Branch (MIB) investigation reports of the BAC 1- 11, A320 and B737 incidents, a
common factor was: "Supervisors tackling long duration, hands-on involved tasks". In the B737
incident, the borescope inspection was carried out by the Base Controller, who needed to do i
., ,
the task in order to retain his borescope authorisation. Also, there is unlikely to be anyone
monitoring or checking the Supervisor, because:
. J
• of his seniority;
• he is generally authorised to sign for his own work (except, of course, in the case where
a duplicate inspection is required);
• he may often have to step in when there are staff shortages and, therefore, no spare staff
to monitor or check the tasks;
• he may be 'closer' (Le. more sensitive to) to any commercial pressures which may exist,
or may perceive that pressure to a greater extent than other engineers.
It is not the intention to suggest that supervisors are more vulnerable to error; rather that the
circumstances which require supervisors to step in and assist tend to be those where several of
the 'defences' (see Chapter 8 - Error) have already failed and which may result in a situation
which is more vulnerable to error.
, .
'
,, -}
!
: j
,....,
I
,i
I
( --~'
,....,
I
I ,
: J
: '
i
Characteristics of a Leader
f '
There are potentially two types of leader in aircraft maintenance: the person officially assigned
the team leader role (possibly called the Supervisor), an individual within a group that the rest of
L
the group tend to follow or defer to (possibly due to a dominant personality, etc.). Ideally of
course, the official team leader should also be the person the rest of the group defer to.
A leader in a given situation is a person whose ideas and actions influence the thought and the
behaviour of others.
i
!
'-
A good leader in the maintenance engineering environment needs to possess a number of
, ,
qualities:
,. Demonstrating by Example
A key skill for a team leader is to lead by example. This does not necessarily mean that a leader
must demonstrate that he is adept at a task as his team (it has already been noted that a
,
,
'
'
Supervisor may not have as much opportunity to practise using their skills). Rather, he must
L demonstrate a personal understanding of the activities and goals of the team so that the team
members respect his authority. It is particularly important that the team leader establishes a
good safety culture within a team through his attitude and actions in this respect.
basis, which includes allocation of tasks and delegation of duties. There can be a tendency for
team members to transfer some of their own responsibilities to the team leader, and he must be
careful to resist this.
Skilled management, supervision and leadership playa significant part in the attainment of r
In terms of the relationship between managers, supervisors and engineers, a 'them and us' I
important that managers, supervisors, engineers and technicians all work together, rather than
against one another, to ensure that aircraft maintenance improves airworthiness.
::
, ,i
'. --~
"'i
i
!
· !
-,
· )
i i
: j
, J
:1
, '
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
I'
L Maintenance Resource Management (MRM)
;
,
, Although not part of the EASA Part-66 Module 9 syllabus, Maintenance Resource Management
!
~
(MRM) is nevertheless included as a specific topic because it is implicit in many of the areas
covered in this chapter, such as team working, communication, responsibility, shift handovers,
The discussion of MRM in this text is intended only as an introduction to the basic concepts, For
in-depth information concerning MRM, the reader is referred to the "Maintenance Resource
Management Handbook" produced on behalf of the FAA
r
[
'-
MRM is not about addressing the individual human factors of the engineer or his manager;
rather, it looks at the larger system of human factors concerns involving engineers, managers
r; and others, working together to promote safety.
i
~
I '
CRM and MRM
[
~
The term 'Maintenance Resource Management' became better known after the Aloha accident
r ,
in 1988, when researchers took Crew Resource Management (CRM) concepts and applied
them to the aircraft maintenance environment. CRM concerns the process of managing all
resources in and out of the cockpit to promote safe flying operations, These resources not only
r '
include the human element, but also mechanical, computer and other supporting systems. MRM
has many similarities to CRM, although the cockpit environment and team is somewhat different
L from that found in aircraft maintenance. The FAA MRM handbook highlights the main
differences between CRM and MRM, and these are summarised in Table 3.2.
.
,
,
CRM MRM
Human error : J
I
Errors tend to be 'active' in that their The consequences of an engineer's error are
consequences follow on immediately after the often not immediately apparent, and this has -.,
,
error. implications for trainina for error avoidance, i
,. J
Communication
Much of flight operations are characterised by Maintenance operations tend to be
synchronous, "face-to-face" communications, characterized by "asynchronous"
, J
or immediate voice communications (e,g, with communications such as technical manuals,
ATC) over the radio, memos, Advisory Circulars, Airworthiness
Directives, workcards and other non-immediate
formats, Much of the information transfer tends
'1
, !
to be of a non-verbal nature,
"Team" composition
Flight crews are mostly homogenous by nature,
in that they are similar in education level and
Maintenance staff are diverse in their range of
experiences and education and this needs to
1
experience, relative to their maintenance be taken into account in a MRM programme,
counteroarts,
Teamwork
Flight deck crew team size is small - two or Maintenance operations are characterised by
three members; although the wider team is large teams working on disjointed tasks,
obviously larger (I.e, flight deck crew + cabin spread out over a hangar. In addition, a " ,
crew, flight crew + ATC, ground crew, etc,) maintenance task may require multiple teams
(hangar, planning department, technical library,
management) each with their own i I
,J
Situation awareness
The flight environment is quickly changing, The maintenance environment, thought hectic,
setting the stage for the creation of active changes slowly relative to flight operations, In
failures, Situation awareness in CRM is tailored terms of situation awareness, engineers must
to avoid these errors; Line Oriented Flight have the ability to extrapolate the
Training (LOFT) simulations provide flight consequences of their errors over hours, days
crews with real-time, simulations to improve or even weeks, To do this, the situation
future situation awareness, awareness cues that are taught must be
tailored to fit the maintenance environment
usina MRM-sDecific simulations,
Leadership
Similar to teamwork issues, leadership skills in Because supervisors or team leaders routinely
CRM often focus mainly on intra-team serve as intermediaries among many points of
behaviours or 'how to lead the team', as well as the
followership skills, Inter-team interaction is organisation, engineer leaders must be skilled
somewhat limited during flight not only in intra-team behaviours, but in ,
The UK Human Factors Combined Action Group (UK-HFCAG) have suggested a generic MRM
syllabus which organisations may wish to adopt. MRM training programmes have been
implemented by several airlines and many claim that such training is extremely successful.
There has been work carried out to evaluate the success of MRM and the reader is directed in
,-
particular at research by Taylor, which looks at the success of MRM programmes in various US i
airlines. , J
1
.,
·!
,j
-,
I
, J
l J
I
J
L J
, j
·J
,
,
I
,_.J
3-42 Module 9.3 Social Psychology
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement .,
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
!
!
, J
II !
, '
,
, '
,
! '
i '
,r '
TTS Integrated
I
'-
,, '
, ;
Training System
, '
I
I
'-
,
~
Module 9
( ,
(
~
i
1
Human Factors
,j '
,
( '
, '
,r :
1 :
Copyright Notice
© Copyright. All worldwide rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any other means whatsoever: i.e. . j
photocopy, electronic, mechanical recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of
Total Training Support Ltd.
~ _J
LEVEL 2
• A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject. ,
• An ability to apply that knowledge. , J
Objectives:
• The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical , J
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the L. j
subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
l J
LEVEL 3
• A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive , ,
manner.
Objectives: r'l
• The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects. I ,
l J
• The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples. ,....,,
• The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject. i
• The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics " )
r '
Table of Contents
" ,
Chapter 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5
Fitness and Health 5
c ' Pre-employment Disposition 5
Day-to-Day Fitness and Health 6
Positive Measures 7
Stress 9
Causes and Symptoms 9
Domestic Stress 10
Work Related Stress 10
Stress Management 11
Time Pressure and Deadlines 13
( , The Effects ofTime Pressure and Deadlines 13
Managing Time Pressure and Deadlines 14
L Workload - Overload and Underload 15
Arousal 15
Factors Determining Workload 17
Overload 17
Underload 18
Workload Management 18
Sleep, Fatigue and Shift Work 21
What Is Sleep? 21
Circadian Rhythms 23
Fatigue 24
Shift Work 27
r ' Sleep, Fatigue, Shift Work and the Aircraft Maintenance Engineer 28
Alcohol, Medication and Drug Abuse 33
Alcohol 33
Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003 34
Alcohol and Sleep 40
Alcohol and Attention 41
Medication 42
(" 1
Drugs 43
Non-Prescribed Drugs 43
Diet and Nutrition 45
Eating Habits/Patterns 45
Culture 45
Nutrition 45
Glycaemic Index (GI) 45
Drinking Habits 49
Dehydration 49
('
(
'--'
Fitness/health; 9.3 2
" :i
Stress:domestic and work related; ..:
Time pressure and deadlines; 1,
, J
<- ,)
-;
,i
,. )
f(
,
; i
j
,
I
\. .J
i
l )
" !
,
i. -'
. ,(
I
, ,
I
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
"The holder of an aircraft maintenance engineer's licence shall not exercise the privileges of
r . such a licence if he knows or suspects that his physical or mental condition renders him unfit to
L exercise such privileges."
", There are two aspects to fitness and health: the disposition of the engineer prior to taking on
I
employment and the day-to-day well being of the engineer once employed.
Pre-employment Disposition
, . Some employers may require a medical upon commencement of employment. This allows them
to judge the fitness and health of an applicant (and this may also satisfy some pension or
insurance related need). There is an obvious effect upon an engineer's ability to perform
maintenance or carry out inspections if through poor physical fitness or health he is constrained
[ '
I in some way (such as his freedom of movement, or his sight). In addition, an airworthiness
!
~
authority, when considering issuing a licence, will consider these factors and may judge the
condition to be of such significance that a licence could not be issued. This would not, however,
affect the individual's possibility of obtaining employment in an alternative post within the
industry where fitness and health requirements are less stringent.
,.
,
, '
Fitness and health can have a significant affect upon job performance (both physical and
cognitive). Day-to-day fitness and health can be reduced through illness (physical or mental) or
, )
injury.
EASA Part-66.50 imposes a requirement that "certifying staff must not exercise the privileges of
their certification authorisation if they know or suspect that their physical or mental condition
renders them unfit." r-,
,
,
, j
Responsibility falls upon the individual aircraft maintenance engineer to determine whether he is
not well enough to work on a particular day. Alternatively, his colleagues or supervisor may ,....,
i
persuade or advise him to absent himself until he feels better. In fact, as the CM's CAAIPs '. j
Leaflet 15-6 (previously published as Airworthiness Notice 47) points out, it is a legal
requirement for aircraft maintenance engineers to make sure they are fit for work:
, j
"Fitness: In most professions there is a duty of care by the individual to assess his or her own
fitness to carry out professional duties. This has been a legal requirement for some time for
doctors, flight crew members and air traffic controllers. Licensed aircraft maintenance engineers
are also now required by law to take a similar professional attitude. Cases of subtle physical or
mental illness may not always be apparent to the individual but as engineers often work as a i ,
member of a team any substandard performance or unusual behaviour should be quickly " ;
noticed by colleagues or supervisors who should notify management so that appropriate
support and counseling action can be taken."
Many conditions can impact on the health and fitness of an engineer and there is not space
here to offer a complete list. However, such a list would include:
• Affects of toxins and other foreign substances (such as carbon monoxide poisoning, l. )
alcohol, illicit drugs, etc.).
....,
I
This document does not attempt to give hard and fast guidelines as to what constitutes 'unfit for i
work'; this is a complex issue dependent upon the nature of the illness or condition, its effect
upon the individual, the type of work to be done, environmental conditions, etc. Instead, it is
important that the engineer is aware that his performance, and consequently the safety of
aircraft he works on, might be affected adversely by illness or lack of fitness.
....,
I
An engineer may consider that he is letting down his colleagues by not going to work through , ,!
illness, especially if there are ongoing manpower shortages. However, he should remind himself
that, in theory, management should generally allow for contingency for illness. Hence the
burden should not be placed upon an individual to turn up to work when unfit if no such j
contingency is available. Also, if the individual has a contagious illness (e.g. 'flu), he may pass
, J
4-6 Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System govemed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
L.
this on to his colleagues if he does not absent himself from work and worsen the manpower
problem in the long run. There can be a particular problem with some contract staff due to loss
of earnings or even loss of contract if absent from work due to illness. They may be tempted to
f '
disguise their illness, or may not wish to admit to themselves or others that they are ill. This is of
course irresponsible, as the illness may well adversely affect the contractor's standard of work.
r •
i
Positive Measures
r '
Aircraft maintenance engineers can take common sense steps to maintain their fitness and
i health. These include:
L
• Eating regular meals and a well-balanced diet;
• Taking regular exercise (exercise sufficient to double the resting pulse rate for 20
minutes, three times a week is often recommended);
• Stopping smoking;
f • • Sensible alcohol intake (for men, this is no more than 3 - 4 units a day or 28 per week,
L. where a unit is equivalent to half a pint of beer or a glass of wine or spirit);
• Finally, day-to-day health and fitness can be influenced by the use of medication, alcohol
I ' and illicit drugs. These are covered later.
r ,
II '
! '
I
~
,
,
~
r, •
,
.,
i
I
~
, '
"
I
.
L
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance 4-7
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
I . on [l80e 2 of this cheoter
ff'l ("'nn\lr;nht ?n1 n
Integrated Training System 'I!
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
~_ J
, )
Intentionally Blank
, ,
, !
, \
i
! .1
! ,
Stress
, . Stress is an inescapable part of life for all of us.
L.
Stress can be defined as any force, that when applied to a system, causes some significant
r • modification of its form, where forces can be physical, psychological or due to social pressures.
From a human viewpoint, stress results from the imposition of any demand or set of demands
which require us to react, adapt or behave in a particular manner in order to cope with or satisfy
them. Up to a point, such demands are stimulating and useful, but if the demands are beyond
our personal capacity to deal with them, the resulting stress is a problem.
r •
l~
Causes and Symptoms
,. Stress is usually something experienced due to the presence of some form of stressor, which
L might be a one-off stimulus (such as a challenging problem or a punch on the nose), or an on-
going factor (such as an extremely hot hangar or an acrimonious divorce). From these, we get
f ' acute stress (typically intense but of short duration) and chronic stress (frequent recurrence or
of long duration) respectively.
Different stressors affect different people to varying extents. Stressors may be:
~'
• Physical - such as heat, cold, noise, vibration, presence of something damaging to health
r.
(e.g. carbon monoxide);
• Psychological - such as emotional upset (e.g. due to bereavements, domestic problems,
etc.), worries about real or imagined problems (e.g. due to financial problems, ill health,
etc.);
• Reactive - such as events occurring in everyday life (e.g. working under time pressure,
,, . encountering unexpected situations, etc.).
Types of stressors
r .
• Physical: heat, noise, vibration, etc.
• Social: anxiety, incentives, group pressures.
r • • Drugs: alcohol, nicotine, medication, etc.
• Work: boredom, fatigue, sleep deprivation too much to do in too little time.
• Body clock: shift changes, jet lag.
• Personal: domestic worries, aches and pains, feeling under the weather, etc.
L
!' CAAIPs Leaflet 15-6 (previously published as Airworthiness Notice 47) points out that:
"A stress problem can manifest itself by signs of irritability, forgetfulness, sickness absence,
mistakes, or alcohol or drug abuse. Management have a duty to identify individuals who may be
suffering from stress and to minimise workplace stresses. Individual cases can be helped by
sympathetic and skilful counseling which allows a return to effective work and licensed duties."
f :
I
'-
r •
i
~
!,
Designed in association with the .
C .J
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
It should be noted that individuals respond to stressful situations in very different ways.
", i
c.)
Generally speaking though, people tend to regard situations with negative consequences as
being more stressful than when the outcome of the stress will be positive (e.g. the difference
"i
between being made redundant from work and being present at the birth of a son or daughter). l __ J
the engineer's task performance and ability to pay due attention to safety.
~
Domestic stress typically results from major life changes at home, such as marriage, birth of a
!
child, a son or daughter leaving home, bereavement of a close family member or friend, marital
problems, or divorce.
task or job they are undertaking at that moment, or because of the general organisational.
environment. Stress can be felt when carrying out certain tasks that are particularly challenging
or difficult. This stress can be increased by lack of guidance in this situation, or time pressures
to complete the task or job (covered later in this chapter). This type of stress can be reduced by
careful management, good training, etc.
Within the organisation, the social and managerial aspects of work can be stressful.
Chapter 3 discussed the impact on the individual of peer pressure, organizational culture and
management, all of which can be stressors. In the commercial world that aircraft maintenance
engineers work in, shift patterns, lack of control over own workload, company reorganisation
.J
and job uncertainty can also be sources of stress.
'___ J
~
i l
. I
, __ J
4-10 Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance
Use and/or disclosure is
ITS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
i '
I
w
! .
i
L. Stress Management
r ' Once we become aware of stress, we generally respond to it by using one of two strategies:
L defense or coping.
,r • Defense strategies involve alleviation of the symptoms (taking medication, alcohol, etc.) or
i reducing the anxiety (e.g. denying to yourself that there is a problem (denial), or blaming
'-
someone else).
r '
!
'-
Coping strategies involve dealing with the source of the stress rather than just the symptoms
(e.g. delegating workload, prioritizing tasks, sorting out the problem, etc.).
,, .
,_ Coping is the process whereby the individual either adjusts to the perceived demands of the
situation or changes the situation itself.
r •
I
~ Unfortunately, it is not always possible to deal with the problem if this is outside the control of
the individual (such as during an emergency), but there are well-published techniques for
,,
,
.
helping individuals to cope with stress. Good stress management techniques include:
L.
• Relaxation techniques;
• Careful regulation of sleep and diet;
• A regime of regular physical exercise;
• Counseling - ranging from talking to a supportive friend or colleague to seeking
I professional advice.
L.
I ' There is no magic formula to cure stress and anxiety, merely common sense and practical
i
~
advice.
Stress is part of our lifestyle. It is inevitable but manageable. Management of stress is relatively
easy once learnt. But we each have to learn a way that best suits us. We need to find the
r . particular technique that tickles our own fancy. The objective is not to confront stress head on.
Like a kite it will climb against the wind and become even more challenging. The idea is to
defuse it, to divide it into bite-size chunks, and remind yourself that it is temporary. It will pass
and there is a future. Alcohol does not defuse stress, it defers it and then it is added to the next
days lot.
.,
I
,
'--
r ,
• Exercise /sports Physical demand takes your mind of mental problems and is good for
" i
you. Physical demand that also demands mental concentration is even better i.e. golf, or I
'. j
sailing, is more diverting than jogging.
• Fresh air The wide world around us keeps everything in perspective and reinforces our
hope and realisation that we are both small, and large in the scheme of things; .J
• Diversions/hobbies Mental and manipulative occupation is a marvelous relaxant
something that requires total concentration.
• Relaxation therapy and meditation These use the same technique of mental occupation \ J
and diversion so that the build-up of stress is deflated by inattention. It is not the same as
lying in the sun and snoozing as the brain dwells on the problem. They are effective and
easy-to-Iearn techniques for focusing the single-channel processor of the conscious mind
on a trivial routine symbol.
• Sex Good for the soul, the mind and the body and ...
This outlines how skilled performance breaks down as the result of fatigue or stress. As
indicated previously, the direction of this breakdown process is in the opposite direction to skill ~
acquisition. I
I
L J
, i
i
, !
, ,i
, 1
i I
, ;
I, J
I
, :
4-12 Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this cnapter.
r ' Integrated Training System
L Designed in assodation with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
r, '
L.,
Time Pressure and Deadlines
There is probably no industry in the commercial environment that does not impose some form of
deadline, and consequently time pressure, on its employees, Aircraft maintenance is no
exception, It was highlighted in the previous section that one of the potential stressors in
, '
maintenance is time pressure, This might be actual pressure where clearly specified deadlines
L are imposed by an external source (e,g, management or supervisors) and passed on to
engineers, or perceived where engineers feel that there are time pressures when carrying out
tasks, even when no definitive deadlines have been set in stone, In addition, time pressure may
be self-imposed, in which case engineers set themselves deadlines to complete work (e,g,
completing a task before a break or before the end of a shift),
, '
( ,
It is possible that perceived time pressure would appear to have been a contributory factor in
the BAC 1-11 accident described in Chapter 1, Although the aircraft was not required the
r ' following morning for operational use, it was booked for a wash, The wash team had been
I booked the previous week and an aircraft had not been ready, This would have happened
'--
again, due to short-staffing, so the Shift Manager decided to carry out the windscreen
replacement task himself so that the aircraft would be ready in time,
An extract from the NTSB report on the Aloha accident refers to time pressure as a possible
contributory factor in the accident: "The majority of Aloha's maintenance was normally
I:- conducted only during the night. It was considered important that the airplanes be available
again for the next day's flying schedule, Such aircraft utilization tends to drive the scheduling,
and indeed, the completion of required maintenance work, Mechanics and inspectors are forced
to perform under time pressure, Further, the intense effort to keep the airplanes flying may have
been so strong that the maintenance personnel were reluctant to keep airplanes in the hangar
I : any longer than absolutely necessary,"
I
Those responsible for setting deadlines and allocating tasks should consider: '""l
!
I
, .J
• Prioritising various pieces of work that need to be done;
• The actual time available to carry out work (considering breaks, shift handovers, etc.);
• The personnel available throughout the whole job (allowing a contingency for illness);
• The most appropriate utilisation of staff (considering an engineer's specialisation, and
strengths and limitations);
• Availability of parts and spares.
It is important that engineering staff at all levels are not afraid to voice concerns over
inappropriate deadlines, and if necessary, cite the need to do a safe job to support this. As ~.J
highlighted in Chapter 3, within aircraft maintenance, responsibility should be spread across all
those who playa part. Thus, the aircraft maintenance engineer should not feel that the 'buck
stops here'. , J
L J
:. j
I
c_ .)
~
,
.. ,i
I
, J
l i
-I
4-14 Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
, '
Arousal
Arousalin its most general sense, refers to readiness of a person for performing work. To
achieve an optimum level of task performance, it is necessary to have a certain level of
stimulation or arousal. This level of stimulation or arousal varies from person to person. There
L are people who are overloaded by having to do more than one task at a time; on the other hand
there are people who appear to thrive on stress, being happy to take on more and more work or
i challenges. Figure 4.1 shows the general relationship between arousal and task performance.
L
Performance
Good
Performance
( '
, '
Poor
I Performance
'- Poor
Performance
i '
f i
U Level of
Arousal
r • Optimum Aroused
Over - Aroused
Under - Aroused
L Figure 4.1: Optimum arousal leads to best task performance
r '
At low levels of arousal, our attentional mechanisms will not be particularly active and our
performance capability will be low (complacency and boredom can result). At the other end of
r '
the curve, performance deteriorates when arousal becomes too high. To a certain extent, this is
[ because we are forced to shed tasks and focus on key information only (called narrowing of
attention). Best task performance occurs somewhere in the middle.
I '
In the work place, arousal is mainly influenced by stimulation due to work tasks.
L 4-15
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on paQe 2 of this chapter. ® f':nr\\lr;nht ?n1 n
• J
However, surrounding environmental factors such as noise may also influence the level of 1c. .
arousal. J
Summary
Level of arousal has an important influence upon performance. The best performance is
associated with an intermediate level of arousal. This is sometimes called the inverted U-curve;
reflecting how performance varies with arousal level. l, I
• Arousal is the body's reaction to stresses, drives and motivation.
• Sleep (low arousal) -- Panic (high arousal) :l_.Ji
• Too little or too much arousal causes poor performance.
• Low arousal: focus on task-irrelevant cues.
• High arousal: neglect task relevant cues. l
!
·"
~
,
!J
'I
·, 1
~. .J
l
~ J
• J
~ J
~
· ,
r,
•~ 1I
4-16 Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System govemed by the statement
·" i
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
· J
r . Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
L·
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
,, . As noted in the section on information processing in Chapter 2, humans have limited mental
capacity to deal with information. We are also limited physically, in terms of visual acuity,
strength, dexterity and so on. Thus, workload reflects the degree to which the demands of the
work we have to do eats into our mental and physical capacities. Workload is subjective (Le.
L experienced differently by different people) and is affected by:
'-
• skills (both physical and mental);
r ~ • his experience (particularly familiarity with the task in question);
!r_ • his current health and fitness levels;
• his emotional state (e.g. stress level, mood, etc.).
r· .,
i
L As the workload of the engineer may vary, he may experience periods of overload and
underload. This is a particular feature of some areas of the industry such as line maintenance.
r
!
'-- Overload
r . Overload occurs at very high levels of workload (when the engineer becomes over aroused). As
highlighted previously, performance deteriorates when arousal becomes too high and we are
forced to shed tasks and focus on key information. Error rates may also increase. Overload can
occur for a wide range of reasons based on the factors highlighted above. It may happen
suddenly (e.g. if asked to remember one further piece of information whilst already trying to
remember a large amount of data), or gradually. Although EASA Part-145 states that ''The Part-
r • 145 approved maintenance organisation must employ sufficient personnel to plan, perform,
i supervise and inspect the work in accordance with the approval", and "the Part-145 organisation
L
should have a production man hours plan showing that it has sufficient man hours for the work
that is intended to be carried out", this does not prevent individuals from becoming overloaded.
As noted earlier in this section, it can be difficult to determine how work translates into workload,
both for the individual concerned, and for those allocating tasks.
n
Underload ,
I,
I
Underload occurs at low levels of workload (when the engineer becomes under aroused). It can
be just as problematic to an engineer as overload, as it too causes a deterioration in n
performance and an increase in errors, such as missed information. Underload can result from a '. __J
:
task an engineer finds boring, very easy, or indeed a lack of tasks. The nature of the aircraft
......,
maintenance industry means that available work fluctuates, depending on time of day,
maintenance schedules, and so forth. Hence, unless stimulating 'housekeeping' tasks can be !
J
,. )
Workload Management
Unfortunately, in a commercial environment, it is seldom possible to make large amendments to
maintenance schedules, nor eliminate time pressures. The essence of workload management in
aircraft maintenance should include:
• ensuring that staff have the skills needed to do the tasks they have been asked to do and
the proficiency and experience to do the tasks within the timescales they have been
asked to work within; : !
• J
• making sure that staff have the tools and spares they need to do the tasks;
• allocating tasks to teams or individual engineers that are accomplishable (without cutting
corners) in the time available;
• providing human factors training to those responsible for planning so that the
performance and limitations of their staff are taken into account; ......,
i
• encouraging individual engineers, supervisors and managers to recognise when an
overload situation is building up.
'I
: !
If an overload situation is developing, methods to help relieve this include: , I
• seeking a simpler method of carrying out the work (that is just as effective and still
legitimate); i. J
Thus, although workload varies in aircraft maintenance engineering, the workload of engineers
can be moderated. Much of this can be done by careful forward planning of tasks, manpower,
spares, tools and training of staff.
, ;
L...'
r •
!
,
'-'
{ ,
r ;
r •
,
r
u
",
:
, ,
i
I
c J
Intentionally Blank
, ,
"
,:
i
'-- Sleep, Fatigue and Shift Work
What Is Sleep?
I ' Man, like all living creatures has to have sleep. Despite a great deal of research, the purpose of
,
'.
sleep is not fully understood.
~
Sleep is a natural state of reduced consciousness involving changes in body and brain
physiology which is necessary to man to restore and replenish the body and brain.
( . Sleep can be resisted for a short time, but various parts of the brain ensure that sooner or later,
sleep occurs. When it does, it is characterised by five stages of sleep:
!' • Stage 1: This is a transitional phase between waking and sleeping. The heart rate slows
and muscles relax. It is easy to wake someone up.
r. • Stage 2: This is a deeper level of sleep, but it is still fairly easy to wake someone.
• Stage 3: Sleep is even deeper and the sleeper is now quite unresponsive to external
stimuli and so is difficult to wake. Heart rate, blood pressure and body temperature
r : continue to drop.
• Stage 4: This is the deepest stage of sleep and it is very difficult to wake someone up.
• Rapid Eye Movement or REM Sleep: Even though this stage is characterised by brain
activity similar to a person who is awake, the person is even more difficult to awaken than
stage 4. It is therefore also known as paradoxical sleep. Muscles become totally relaxed
and the eyes rapidly dart back and forth under the eyelids. It is thought that dreaming
,( . occurs during REM sleep.
,
'-
Stages 1 to 4 are collectively known as non-REM (NREM) sleep. Stages 2-4 are categorised as
,. slow-wave sleep and appear to relate to body restoration, whereas REM sleep seems to aid the
strengthening and organisation of memories. Sleep deprivation experiments suggest that if a
person is deprived of stage 1-4 sleep or REM sleep he will show rebound effects. This means
.r . that in subsequent sleep, he will make up the deficit in that particular type of sleep. This shows
the importance of both types of sleep.
! . As can be seen from Figure 4.2, sleep occurs in cycles. Typically, the first REM sleep will occur
about 90 minutes after the onset of sleep. The cycle of stage 1 to 4 sleep and REM sleep
repeats during the night about every 90 minutes.
I '
[ ,
I
'-
,.
Most deep sleep occurs earlier in the night and REM sleep becomes greater as the night goes
on.
Awake
1
'\ REM 1
'<{
R M2 REM3
J,x
R M4
{JJ
REM6
J,x
L )
r
..
<>.
1/1
2
J\ j
....
II-
o
0)
3 1.1
" J
~
1/1
j
4 \. J
1 Hr 2 Hr 3 Hr 4 Hr 5 Hr 6 Hr 7 Hr 8 Hr
Hours of Sleep
'I
:
Figure 4.2: Typical cycle of stage 1-4 (NREM) sleep and REM sleep in the course of a night.
'I
, j
~\
, j
, ,
" j
' I,
,_ 1
L )
!
:, j
4-22 Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
'.. Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Circadian Rhythms
r • Apart from the alternation between wakefulness and sleep, man has other internal cycles, such
as body temperature and hunger/eating. These are known as circadian rhythms as they are
related to the length of the day.
Circadian rhythms are physiological and behavioural functions and processes in the body that
have a regular cycle of approximately a day (actually about 25 hours in man).
r •
Although, circadian rhythms are controlled by the brain, they are influenced and synchronised
by external (environmental) factors such as light.
An example of disrupting circadian rhythms would be taking a flight that crosses time zones.
This will interfere with the normal synchronisation with the light and dark (day/night). This throws
out the natural link between daylight and the body's internal clock, causing jet lag, resulting in
sleepiness during the day, etc. Eventually however, the circadian rhythm readjusts to the
revised environmental cues.
r .
Figure 4.3 shows the circadian rhythm for body temperature. This pattern is very robust,
( ,
meaning that even if the normal pattern of wakefulness and sleep is disrupted (by shift work for
i
example), the temperature cycle remains unchanged. Hence, it can be seen that if you are
awake at 4-6 o'clock in the morning, your body temperature is in a trough and it is at this time
that is hardest to stay awake. Research has shown that this drop in body temperature appears
to be linked to a drop in alertness and performance in man.
'--
G)
.....
::J
~
.....
'-- G)
a.
: E
G)
i
'-- I-
>-
"C
0
r:o
'--'
I .
, 00:00 06:00 12:00 18:00 24:00 06:00
'--'
lime of Day
,,
,1 Figure 4.3: The Circadian Rhythm for Internal Body Temperature
'--'
Although there are many contributory factors, it is noteworthy that a number of major incidents
and accidents involving human error have either occurred or were initiated in the pre-dawn
hours, when body temperature and performance capability are both at their lowest. These
include Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Bhopal, as well as the BAC1-11, A320, and B737
incidents sumrnarised in Chapter 1.
The engineer's performance at this 'low point' will be improved if he is well rested, feeling well,
highly motivated and well practised in the skills being used at that point.
Fatigue
Fatigue is a loss of alertness and a feeling of tiredness that can be caused by a lack of sleep, a
change in your work schedule due to working overtime or working second shift, or trying to fit
too many things in a 24-hour period.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has found fatigue to be a causal or '. )
contributory factor in accidents in every mode of transportation and has issued almost 80
fatigue-related safety recommendations since 1972. The National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) Ames Fatigue Countermeasures program has addressed fatigue in , )
aviation through research and other activities since 1980.
)
A look at the causes . ,
Our internal clock or circadian clock controls immune function, digestion, performance,
alertness, and mood. The lowest point occurs around 3 to 5 a.m. each day making this time
period one of the lowest levels of performance activity, although sometimes it can be anywhere
from midnight to 6 a.m. A second period of sleepiness occurs around 3 to 5 p.m. These low
circadian levels are associated with decreased performance and alertness. And these time
,
periods can become more relevant if there is an accident and a follow-up investigation. c J
Fatigue is most often associated with being extra tired and the usual cause and effect scenario
leads one to consider sleep (or sleeplessness). Eight hours of sleep is considered the norm for '~ )
the average person, although it can vary by the individual and range from six to ten hours.
Sleep loss can be acute, the amount of sleep loss in a 24-hour period, and cumulative, sleep : i
loss over several days. Recovery from cumulative sleep loss requires more deep sleep and not '. )
an hour-for-hour exchange.
,
How long an individual remains awake is a factor that can affect performance and alertness. ',. J
Studies have examined the lengths of shifts and the results on performance. NTSB data has
shown an increased risk beyond 12 hours. And at 16 hours of work, a national occupation-injury
database revealed an accident/injury rate three times greater than a nine-hour shift. Seventeen . J
hours or longer of prolonged wakefulness can be similar to changes experienced with alcohol
consumption.
Research has shown that the effects of fatigue are similar to moderate alcohol consumption.
On-the-job performance loss for every hour of wakefulness between 10 and 26 hours is
equivalent to a 0.004 percent rise in blood alcohol concentration. Eighteen hours of wakefulness
are usually considered to be equivalent to a blood alcohol concentration of 0.05 percent. A
person who has been awake for this length of time will act and perform as if he or she has
'.. J
! '
consumed one glass of beer. The result is significantly delayed response and reaction times,
impaired reasoning, reduced vigilance, and impaired hand-eye coordination.
Tied in with the study of circadian rhythms is the effect of light. The National Lighting Bureau
(NLB) reveals that research shows that lighting supports more than visual needs, it affects
! . health. The amount of light needed to influence health tends to be about 10 times greater than
\ for vision, according to John Bachner of the NLB. Studies have shown that a lack of light can
L
cause certain forms of cancer. And having greater amounts of light can reduce the risk of colon
(
,
. and prostate cancer; prevent myopia; counteract airborne disease transmission; and cure
! psoriasis, seasonal affective disorder, and sleep disorders.
L
,
( . Other factors that influence fatigue include stress, drugs, medications, illness, large temperature
variations, noise, boredom, vibration, and dehydration (See sidebar on page 85).
Sources of fatigue can be very easy to underestimate. Who reads the packages of cold and
sinus medication? Caution: This drug may cause drowsiness and impair the ability to drive or
operate machinery. So even a runny nose could affect your job performance.
:.
(
Effect on performance
'-
Some of the most common effects due to fatigue are feeling lethargic, becoming withdrawn,
having difficulty concentrating, and a reduced attention span. Other effects include short-term
memory loss (what was I working on?); complacency (it doesn't matter); lack of awareness
affected by hearing and eyesight; loss of coordination; lack of good judgment and decision
( . making; and lengthened reaction time. All of these conditions increase the possibility of reduced
safety and increased risk.
( . Solutions
,
L So what can you do? The best solution is to be aware of your performance level. If you think
there is a problem take a break; a short walk, a glass of water, or a snack might give you the
( . burst of energy you need. Talk to your co-workers; it will increase your awareness of things
L around you. Research has shown that a short nap can also improve alertness and performance.
Other solutions concern your lifestyle. Try and get adequate sleep, exercise regularly, eat a
! . balanced diet, and drink at least eight glasses of water a day.
The typical cup of coffee can improve alertness but only for a limited time. Coffee is a stimulant
( . and causes a temporarily increased level of alertness, but fatigue is a symptom of its
withdrawal. And it's a diuretic, which causes the body to discharge more fluid than it is taking in,
resulting in dehydration, which can also cause fatigue.
I
L If your schedule is too hectic to eat a balanced diet, you can always take vitamins and
,. supplements to fight fatigue. To make up for deficiencies in your diet consider vitamins A, B
complex, C, E, zinc, iron, potassium, and calcium. Use carefully and check with a physician
about use and possible side effects.
!, . Work conditions and practices also need to be considered. A culture that supports safety and
,
~
conducts human factors training so you are more aware of factors that influence performance is
one that will help prevent fatigue or injuries from occurring.
L
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance 4-25
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. (c) r.nnvrinht ?01 0
Integrated Training System "I
Designed in association with the
club66pro,co.uk question practice aid
" ,i
Management should have adequate staff to handle tasks, this includes having the right
experience levels as well as the manpower. And when designing and planning work schedules, , )
Other management practices should include additional inspections, rotating shifts, and longer
rest periods following night shifts. If possible more critical tasks should be allocated for day
shifts. Procedures should be documented so that there is a record of what has been done. This
will ensure tasks are completed or indicate where someone left off in case someone else has to i )
" ,I
',- j
c:
I,
....
'
". ,
\
,
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Shift Work
Most aircraft movements occur between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. to fit in with the requirements of
passengers. Aircraft maintenance engineers are required whenever aircraft are on the ground,
such as during turn arounds. However, this scheduling means that aircraft are often available
r ' for more significant maintenance during the night. Thus, aircraft maintenance engineering is
clearly a 24 hour business and it is inevitable that, to fulfill commercial obligations, aircraft
maintenance engineers usually work shifts. Some engineers permanently work the same shift,
r • but the majority cycle through different shifts. These typically comprise either an 'early shift', a
'late shift' and a 'night shift', or a 'day shift' and a 'night shift' depending on the maintenance
organisation.
I .
Advantages and Disadvantages of Shift Work
There are pros and cons to working shifts. Some people welcome the variety of working
! 1 different times associated with regular shift work patterns.
Advantages may include more days off and avoiding peak traffic times when traveling to work.
;
'-'
The disadvantages of shift working are mainly associated with:
• working 'unsociable hours', meaning that time available with friends, family, etc. will be
disrupted;
• working when human performance is known to be poorer (Le. between 4 a.m and 6
, .
i . a.m.);
,
'-" • problems associated with general desynchronisation and disturbance of the body's
various rhythms (principally sleeping patterns).
Working At Night
Shift work means that engineers will usually have to work at night, either permanently or as part
r,
i
of a rolling shift pattern. As discussed earlier in this chapter, this introduces the inherent
'-...1 possibility of increased human errors. Working nights can also lead to problems sleeping during
the day, due to the interference of daylight and environmental noise. Blackout curtains and use
of ear plugs can help, as well as avoidance of caffeine before sleep.
In the B737 double engine oil loss incident, the error occurred during the night shift. The
accident investigation report commented that: "It is under these circumstances that the fragility
of the self monitoring system is most exposed because the safety system can be jeopardised by
r ' poor judgment on the part of one person and it is also the time at which people are most likely
to suffer impaired judgment".
c..'
, .
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance 4-27
governed by the statement ITS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © r.nnvrinht ?n1 n
Integrated Training System
Designed in associatlon with the
c!ub66pro,co.uk question practice aid
between individuals, some needing more and some happy with less than this to be fully !
;~ )
refreshed. They can usually perform adequately with less that this for a few days, building up a
temporary sleep 'deficit'. However, any sleep deficit will need to be made up, otherwise
performance will start to suffer. ,
· \
A good rule of thumb is that one hour of high-quality sleep is good for two hours of activity.
'.J
As previously noted, fatigue is best tackled by ensuring adequate rest and good quality sleep
are obtained. The use of blackout curtains if having to sleep during daylight has already been
mentioned. It is also best not to eat a large meal shortly before trying to sleep, but on the other c J
hand, the engineer should avoid going to bed hungry. As fatigue is also influenced by illness,
alcohol, etc., it is very important to get more sleep if feeling a little unwell and drink only in
moderation between duties (discussed further in the next section). Taking over-the-counter
drugs to help sleep should only be used as a last resort.
When rotating shifts are worked, it is important that the engineer is disciplined with his eating ·
'. J
,
and sleeping times. Moreover, out of work activities have to be carefully planned. For example,
it is obvious that an individual who has been out night-clubbing until the early hours of the
morning will not be adequately rested if rostered on an early shift.
Shift working patterns encountered by aircraft maintenance engineers may include three or four
days off after the last night shift. It can be tempting to work additional hours, taking voluntary
overtime, or another job, in one or more of these days off. This is especially the case when first
starting a career in aircraft maintenance engineering when financial pressures may be higher.
Engineers should be aware that their vulnerability to error is likely to be increased if they are L. ;
tired or fatigued, and they should try to ensure that any extra hours worked are kept within
reason.
It is always sensible to monitor ones performance, especially when working additional hours.
Performance decrements can be gradual, and first signs of chronic fatigue may be moodiness,
>
headaches or finding that familiar tasks (such as programming the video recorder) seem more 'c __
Finally, it is worth noting that, although most engineers adapt to shift working, it becomes harder '- j
, !
· i
~
,
~ 8Hrs
25Hrs
'-
25Hrs
S S
! '
!
L L L
I
'-' E E E
E E E
, P P P
'-'
( ,
j
!
'-
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 DayS
L
Timing Planned Sleep
24Hrs 24Hrs
Dege DegF
36.9 98.4
~
36.5 97.7
L....'
36.1 97.0
'-
r Day 1
<> Day 2
'-'
Naps
A nap is a short period of sleep taken at any hour.
The time of day, the duration of the nap and the sleep credit/deficit of the individual .. J
will determine through which sleep stages the individual will pass.
The restorative properties of naps will vary from one individual to another.
- Those who habitually take naps appear to gain more benefit than non-habitual
1Al..JL~
nappers, who sometimes perform at a reduced level for some time after
awakening from the nap.
With the increase in extended flight times there is debate about allowing a crew
~-~ member to take 20 to 30 minute naps in the seat in an effort to keep him/her fresh .
It is not unknown for one of the pilots to be taking a nap and the other pilot to fall
asleep.
• :11;;' After napping it may take some minutes to coliect one's thoughts and they will have
. . . . . . . . !:.i![ iii slow responses and reactions for up to 5 minutes after being roused.
T~e minimum duration for a nap to be restorative appears to be not less than ten
minutes.
,
L...:
i )
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
( ,
Microsleeps
Microsleeps are very short periods of sleep lasting from a fraction
of a second to two to three seconds.
Although their existence can be confirmed by EEG readings, the
individual may be unaware of their occurrence which makes them
particularly dangerous.
They occur most often in conditions of fatigue but are of no
assistance in reducing sleepiness.
An engineer rostered for night duty will attempt to get some sleep
during the afternoon prior to reporting for duty.
However, it will be difficult to get any satisfactory sleep due to
having a good sleep credit assuming a normal night's sleep had
been achieved the night before, plus an increasing body
temperature does not facilitate sleep.
There are basically two options in this case:
(
,
, Firstly, one could go to bed early the previous night and set
the alarm for an early call so that by the afternoon the body
will be approaching sleep deficit and be ready for sleep.
Second alternative would be to go to bed late the previous
night, sleep late, relax in the afternoon and still have a good
sleep credit for the night duty.
Sleep Disorders
r ' Narcolepsy
I An inability to stop falling asleep even when in sleep credit.
L Specialists believe that this is associated with the inability of the brain to distinguish between wakefulness and REM sleep.
Apnoea
A cessation of breathing whilst asleep.
A common condition and the subject will nann ally either wake up or restart breathing after a short time.
It becomes a more serious problem when the breathing stoppage lasts for up to a minute and the frequency of stoppages
increases.
The frequent awakenings will disturb the nonnal sleep pattern and the individual may experience excessive daytime sleepiness.
Sleepwalking (Somnambulism)
This condition, as well as talking in one's sleep, is more common in childhood, but does occur later in life.
It may happen more frequently in those operating irregular hours or those under some stress.
The condition should not cause difficulty in healthy adults unless the sleep walker is involved in an accident whilst away from his
'"-' bed.
Insomnia
This is simply the term for difficulty in sleeping.
Clinical insomnia - a person has difficulty in sleeping under normal, regular conditions in phase with the body rhythms (an
inability to sleep when the body's systems are calling for sleep).
Clinical Insomnia is rarely a disorder within itself, It is normally a symptom of another disorder.
For this reason the common and symptomatic treatment with sleeping drugs or tranquillisers is inappropriate unless
\ ' treatment for the underlying cause is also undertaken.
I Situational insomnia - an inability to sleep due to disrupted workfrest patterns, or circadian disrhythmia.
This often occurs when one is required to sleep but the brain and body are not in the sleeping phase.
This condition is the one most frequently reported by aircrew.
i
L...
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance 4-31
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on oaoe 2 of this chapter. IA r.-.n\lrinht ?n1 n
Integrated Training System
Designed in association wjth the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
( .. .'
'- !
'""' i
.i
Intentionally Blank
__ .J
,--'
'.. "
-,
'The holder of an aircraft maintenance engineer's licence shall not, when exercising the
privileges of such a licence, be under the influence of drink or a drug to such an extent as to
< ' impair his capacity to exercise such privileges."
The current law which does not prescribe a blood/alcohol limit, is soon to change. There will be
new legislation permitting police to test for drink or drugs where there is reasonable cause, and
the introduction of a blood/alcohol limit of 20 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood for
anyone performing a safety critical role in UK civil aviation (which includes aircraft maintenance
engineers).
Alcohol
Alcohol acts as a depressant on the central nervous system, dulling the senses and increasing
mental and physical reaction times. It is known that even a small amount of alcohol leads to a
decline in an individual's performance and may cause his judgment (i.e. ability to gauge his
performance) to be hindered.
Alcohol is removed from the blood at a fixed rate and this cannot be speeded up in any way
(e.g. by drinking strong coffee). In fact, sleeping after drinking alcohol can slow down the
removal process, as the body's metabolic systems are slower.
CAAIP Leaflet 15-6 (previously Airworthiness Notice 47) provides the following advice
concerning alcohol:
"Alcohol has similar effects to tranquillisers and sleeping tablets and may remain circulating in
the blood for a considerable time, especially if taken with food. It may be borne in mind that a
person may not be fit to go on duty even 8 hours after drinking large amounts of alcohol.
Individuals should therefore anticipate such effects upon their next duty period. Special note
{ : should be taken of the fact that combinations of alcohol and sleeping tablets, or anti-histamines,
can form a highly dangerous and even lethal combination."
~ .../
< ' As a general rule, aircraft maintenance engineers should not work for at least eight hours after
,
~
drinking even small quantities of alcohol and increase this time if more has been drunk.
f " The affects of alcohol can be made considerably worse if the individual is fatigued, ill or using
medication.
Even small quantities of alcohol in the blood can impair one's performance, with the added
L danger of relieving anxiety so that the person thinks he is performing marvelously. Alcohol
severely affects a person's judgment and abilities; high altitudes, where there is less oxygen,
i '
worsens the effect. Alcohol is a depressant. It lowers the body's natural sensitivities, cautions
and fears (showing as over-confidence) and, at the same time, it lowers capabilities; a deadly • J
combination as we know by the road accident statistics. It also represses social mores and
allows emotions, that would otherwise be controlled, to run free. Hence loudness, aggression,
anger, passion, violence, showing-off and risk-taking. In some personalities it actually causes
depression and low self-esteem. The World Health Organisation defines an alcoholic as
someone whose excessive drinking repeatedly damages their physical, mental or social life. (I
would add their professional life also.) It takes time for the body to remove alcohol. After heavy
drinking, alcohol may still be in the blood 24 hours later. Having coffee, soup or water between
drinks only helps if they are taken instead of an alcoholic beverage. Otherwise, the body ,
,
~j
receives the same total amount of alcohol in the same time; it takes the same time for it to be
discarded and for its effects to be removed. Also of concern are the long-term effects of alcohol
consumption, such as dependency and damage to kidneys, liver and brain. Studies suggest that
females who drink 14-21 standard drinks per week, or less, and males who drink 21-28 per -.. j
week, or less, should not suffer long-term problems. A standard drink contains 10 grams of
alcohol.
'- j
-,
Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003
· !
The CAA have adopted the Railways and Transport Safety Act of 2003 as their stand on the
use of alcohol and drugs. It is summarised in CAAIP Leaflet 15-5 (previously issued as
Airworthiness Notice 45). It is as follows:
1 Introduction
1.1 The information contained in this Leaflet has been developed in conjunction with the
Department for Transport, the Home Office and the Police, and is consistent with the
criteria contained in the Police Protocol. It is anticipated that this will facilitate a consistent
approach by relevant parties.
1.2 The aim of this Leaflet is to inform Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineers of this new !
legislation and how it affects them in the performance of their duties.
-,
2 Legislative Background
2.1 The effect of intoxication, through alcohol or drugs, on aviation personnel has significant n
i
safety implications. The Air Navigation Order (ANO), which is the main aviation safety · )
regulatory legislation, provides that no member of an aircraft's crew, a licensed aircraft
maintenance engineer or an air traffic control officer shall be under the influence of
alcohol or drugs to such an extent as to impair his/her capacity to carry out their duties.
The ANO, however, does not set a blood alcohol limit nor does it require a person who is
suspected of an alcohol or drugs offence to be subjected to a test.
2.2 In 1996, the Government issued a Consultation Paper on alcohol and drug testing for
aircraft crew and other safety critical civil aviation personnel, which proposed the
introduction of a blood/alcohol limit for certain aviation personnel, together with
corresponding Police powers of enforcement. Responses to the consultation were
broadly supportive of the Government's approach. Part 5 of the Railways and Transport
Safety Act 2003 www.legislation.hmso.gov.uklacts/acts2003/20030020.htm represents
the first suitable legislative opportunity to take forward these proposals and now brings
aviation into line with other transport modes in seeking to tackle alcohol or drug misuse
among key personnel. The Police testing and enforcement powers broadly mirror those
currently applied on our roads and railways and are based on an officer's reasonable
suspicion that an offence either has been, or is in the process of being, committed.
(' ,
2.3 The blood/alcohol limit for aviation personnel is lower than that in shipping or on our
roads or railways, but for pilots reflects the Joint Aviation Requirement on Commercial Air
Transportation (JAR-OPS) - adopted by the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) in 1996-
which requires that crew members of commercial aircraft should not commence a flight
L..-:
duty period with a blood/alcohol level in excess of 20mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood.
The adoption of this limit will go towards the harmonisation of standards across most of
Europe.
Enforcement of the provisions of the Act is the responsibility of the Police and the Crown
Prosecution Service. There is no provision for random testing.
Implementation
Summary of Part 5 of The Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003 and
Commentary on Enforcement
This Part extends to the flight and cabin crew of an aircraft, air traffic controllers and
licensed aircraft maintenance engineers in the United Kingdom. It also applies to the
crew of an aircraft registered in the United Kingdom wherever it may be in the world.
L-
An Explanatory Note may be found at: www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/en/03en20-
, b.htm.
[
6.2 The prescribed blood/alcohol alcohol limits are 20 milligrammes of alcohol per 100
'-' millilitres of blood for those activities carried out by aircrew and air traffic controllers, and
80 milligrams per 100 millilitres for licensed aircraft maintenance engineers. The different
limits reflect the fact that although licensed aircraft maintenance engineers perform a
'- safety critical role in aviation, they do not necessarily require the same
speed of reaction as aircrew or air traffic controllers may need in an emergency situation.
! .
,
~
,~
The equivalent limits in respect of breath and of urine are also set out in this section.
a) When:
• acting as a pilot, cabin crew, flight engineer, flight navigator or flight radiotelephony
operator of an aircraft during flight;
• attending the flight deck of an aircraft during flight to give or supervise training, to
administer a test, to observe a period of practice or to monitor or record the gaining of
experience; or • acting as an air traffic controller in pursuance of a licence granted ,
',_J
under or by virtue of an enactment (other than a licence granted to a student): the
prescribed limit of alcohol is:
i) In the case of breath: 9 microgrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres. " I
7.1 This section applies the offences of being either over the limit or unfit, to people
preparing to carry out an aviation function or otherwise holding themselves ready to carry
out one of those functions by virtue of being on duty or standby.
: )
7.2 An activity shall be treated as an ancillary function if it is undertaken by a person
commencing a period of duty in respect of the function, and as a requirement of, for the ~
I
purpose of or in connection with the performance of the function during the period of
duty. For example, the pre-flight briefing of the flight and cabin crew and any post-flight
activity such as filing reports is considered to be an 'ancillary' function.
The Act provides that the power to require a person to co-operate with a preliminary test
shall apply where:
,~ !
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
{
d) an aircraft is involved in an accident and a constable reasonably suspects that
w the person has undertaken an aviation function, or an activity ancillary to an
aviation function, in relation to the aircraft.
i
w 8.2 A person who, without reasonable excuse, fails to provide a specimen when required to
do so in pursuance of this section is guilty of an offence.
!
'-' 8.3 A person commits an offence under the Act if he/she performs an aviation function, or an
activity that is ancillary to an aviation function, at a time when his/her ability to perform
the function is impaired because of alcohol or drugs. This means that a person can be
L,
tested at any time after commencing duty, including standby.
8.4 The Police will determine when to test. As noted above this will in essence be when there
'-
are reasonable grounds for suspicion that someone is over the prescribed limit, or when
I
an accident has occurred.
1--
8.5 The Police are empowered to breathalyse and to perform subsequent tests (i.e. blood
( , and urine tests). Police officers have been advised to exercise their powers under the Act
as discreetly as circumstances allow and, if possible, in private, particularly where
L
passenger aircraft are concerned. Overtly or insensitively exercising these powers in
, certain circumstances could have detrimental affect on passenger perception and
I
1
~
confidence, and could have commercial implications and liabilities.
i 9.1 Reasonable grounds for suspicion depend upon the circumstances in each case. There
must be an objective basis for that suspicion based on facts, information and/or
intelligence that are relevant to the likelihood of an offence. Reasonable suspicion cannot
be based on generalisations or stereotypical images of certain groups or categories of
'- people as more likely to be involved in criminal activity.
9.2 Reasonable suspicion can sometimes exist without specific information or intelligence
W and on the basis for some level of generalisation stemming from the behaviour of a
person. Reasonable suspicion should normally be linked to accurate and current
I intelligence or information. For example, evidence of impairment from witnesses or from
i
W the result of a primary test of an employee by an employer could be sufficient.
r ':
I 10 Procedure in the Event of a Positive Breathalyser Test
~.
10.1 If, as a result of an initial Police breath test, an officer has reasonable cause to suspect
( :
: , that a person has more than the prescribed proportion of alcohol in their body, then they
L can expect to be arrested and taken to a Police station. There, they will be asked to
i,
I
provide a further specimen of breath, blood or urine for laboratory analysis. In practice,
this will usually be a specimen of blood, taken by a Police doctor. Failure to provide a
specimen without reasonable cause is an offence. Where a sample of blood or urine is
~I
taken, he/she will be entitled to request a part of the sample for themselves. He/she will
be supplied with a booklet of analysts where they can have their specimen privately . J
analysed if they wish.
10.2 Once a blood sample has been taken he/she will probably be released from the Police ~_ J
station on a condition to return at a later date, by which time the Police part of the sample
will have been analysed. If the sample is under the limit he/she will probably be told not
to attend. If, when he/she attends, the results of the analysis of the sample shows that
he/she was over the limit, he/she will be charged with the offence and be given a date to
attend court.
J
10.3 After giving a specimen, the Police may detain the individual at the Police station until it
appears to the officer that there is no likelihood of them carrying out, or attempting to : i
.~ )
carry out, an aviation function of the kind for which they have provided a sample, whilst
still over the prescribed limit or otherwise impaired through alcohol or drugs.
11 Advice to Engineers
.,
This Leaflet should be read in conjunction with CAP 562 Leaflet 15-6, that contains
'~ J
further information on the Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineer's responsibilities when
medically unfit or under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
A constable may arrest a person without a warrant if the constable reasonably suspects
that the person is committing an offence under Section 92 (being unfit for duty), or has
committed an offence under that Section and is still under the influence of alcohol or
drugs.
i. J
. J
i
4-38 Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
, '
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
( ,
12,3 Right of entry (Section 98)
i
~
12,3,1 A Police constable in uniform may board an aircraft if he/she reasonably suspects
that he/she may wish to exercise a power by virtue of Section 96 (power to
administer tests, etc.) or under Section 97 (arrest without a warrant) in respect of a
person who is or may be on the aircraft.
12,3.2 A Police constable in uniform may enter any place if he/she reasonably suspects
that he/she may wish to exercise a power by virtue of Section 96 (power to
administer tests, etc.) or under Section 97 (arrest without a warrant) in respect of a
person who is or may be in that place.
(.
12.3,3 For the purpose of boarding an aircraft or entering a place under this Section, a
Police constable may use reasonable force or may be accompanied by one or
more persons, e.g, airline personnel, additional Police constables, etc, Officers not
,~
used to working on airports or in aircraft and not trained to consider the relevant
aspects of health and safety may wish to be accompanied by an agent of the
~
, airport or the operator as appropriate.
,
'-'
13 Disclosure of Information
13,1 In exercising their powers under this Act, the Police may acquire information that gives
L
cause for serious concern that a person performing a safety critical aviation function is
,I unsuited to hold that position of trust This acquisition may occur even before their
; sample of blood or urine has been analysed or they have been charged, for example,
L.J
where such a person has provided a positive preliminary test
'-
13,2 Such information may be passed to that person's employer or professional body on
grounds of public safety or for the prevention or detection of crime. This will only be
( carried out with the authority of an officer of Assistant Chief of Police rank,
L-
13.2.1 Any disclosure should provide only that information required to determine whether
the offender should continue in their present role pending trial.
13,2.2 If authority to disclose is refused, Police should provide for the analysis of
r ' samples to be fast-tracked by the Forensic Science Service and for the offender to
be charged, if appropriate, at the earliest opportunity.
< 13.3 In reality it is likely that if an individual is tested positive whilst on a duty, this will have an
L..-.' immediate impact on their ability to perform their function and will quickly come to the
attention of the employer.
r ,
;,.,.... 14 CAA Protocol in Suspected Alcohol or Drug Misuse
In cases where a licensed engineer may be misusing alcohol or drugs, a decision will be
made whether there is alcohol or drug dependency that could be a risk to flight safety, If
so, the licence may be suspended, or where the licence has been issued by another
I
state, a recommendation to suspend will be sent to the issuing authority, If that is so,
L he/she will then be invited to take part in a treatment and rehabilitation schedule. If that is
i
--'
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance 4-39
governed by the statement TTS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. {F.} rn..,\/rinht ?n1 n
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the , J
club66pro,co.uk question practice aid
successful, the suspension will be lifted. For non-UK licence holders a recommendation
will be sent to the issuing authority that a rehabilitation schedule was completed.
· !
Alcohol and Sleep
Alcohol has a detrimental effect on both the quality of sleep and on daytime attention. Sleep ; ;
problems are common in alcoholics and also in some people who have completely stopped ... J
drinking. The effects of alcohol on sleep and attention are complicated to define and have
considerable variability in individuals.
:. )
The disruptive effects of alcohol last well into the night, even when alcohol has been eliminated.
, .1
This is not a phenomenon specific to alcohol, it is seen with other sedative products. Snoring is
abnormally frequent after taking alcoholic drinks in the evening before going to bed. This is due
to the relaxing effects of alcohol on the pharyngeal muscles.
and well being. Hence the negative effects of alcohol can have repercussions on daytime
performance.
Epidemiological studies have found that 28 percent of those who complain of insomnia ·
reported using alcohol to help them sleep, and further, individuals who reported having two
weeks or more of insomnia were more likely to have met diagnostic criteria for alcoholism at one
year follow-up. A recent study found that insomniacs were more likely to self-administer ethanol
r '
before bedtime than non-insomniacs. Furthermore, a low dose of ethanol before bedtime made
subtle improvements in the insomniacs' sleep and mood, suggesting that ethanol may be more
reinforcing for insomniacs. Therefore, the degree to which ethanol use in insomniacs extends
beyond the therapeutic context into daytime use is an important line of research. Tolerance
development to low doses of alcohol in insomniacs is also a possibility, which could lead to
increased doses, although this has not been investigated. Finally, for the elderly who use
,! '
alcohol at bedtime to counteract insomnia, there is increased risk for falls during the night. Thus,
~,
whether insomnia precedes the development of alcohol abuse, and the clinical significance of
;' \
the sequencing of these two disorders particularly with respect to age and gender are important
research questions.
Alcohol consumed at bedtime, after an initial stimulating effect, may decrease the time required
( , to fall asleep. Because of alcohol's sedating effect, many people with insomnia consume alcohol
to promote sleep. However, alcohol consumed within an hour of bedtime appears to disrupt the
second half of the sleep period. The subject may sleep fitfully during the second half of sleep,
awakening from dreams and returning to sleep with difficulty. With continued consumption just
before bedtime, alcohol's sleep-inducing effect may decrease, while its disruptive effects
continue or increase. This sleep disruption may lead to daytime fatigue and sleepiness. The
~' -, elderly are at particular risk, because they achieve higher levels of alcohol in the blood and
brain than do younger persons after consuming an equivalent dose. Bedtime alcohol
consumption among older persons may lead to unsteadiness if walking is attempted during the
( . night, with increased risk of falls and injuries.
c·
I •
j
,.
i
'-"
:
,
I
~
-,
Medication
Any medication, no matter how common, can possibly have direct effects or side effects that
may impair an engineer's performance in the workplace.
Medication can be regarded as any over-the-counter or prescribed drug used for therapeutic
purposes.
There is a risk that these effects can be amplified if an individual has a particular sensitivity to
the medication or one of its ingredients. Hence, an aircraft maintenance engineer should be
particularly careful when taking a medicine for the first time, and should ask his doctor whether
any prescribed drug will affect his work performance. It is also wise with any medication to take
the first dose at least 24 hours before any duty to ensure that it does not have any adverse
effects.
Medication is usually taken to relieve symptoms of an illness. Even if the drugs taken do not
affect the engineer's performance, he should still ask himself whether the illness has made him
temporarily unfit for work.
Various publications, and especially CAAI P Leaflet 15-6 (previously published as Airworthiness
Notice 47) give advice relevant to the aircraft maintenance engineer on some of the more
common medications. This information is summarised below, however the engineer must use
this with caution and should seek further clarification from a pharmacist, doctor or their company .-,
occupational health advisor if at all unsure of the impact on work performance.
Analgesics are used for pain relief and to counter the symptoms of colds and 'flu.
In the UK, paracetamol, aspirin and ibuprofen are the most common, and are generally
considered safe if used as directed. They can be taken alone but are often used as an
ingredient of a 'cold relief medicine. It is always worth bearing in mind that the pain or
discomfort that you are attempting to treat with an analgesic (e.g. headache, sore throat, etc.)
may be the symptom of some underlying illness that needs proper medical attention.
Antibiotics (such as Penicillin and the various mycins and cyclines) may have short term or
delayed effects which affect work performance. Their use indicates that a fairly severe infection
may well be present and apart from the effects of these substances themselves, the side-effects
of the infection will almost always render an individual unfit for work.
Anti-histamines are used widely in 'cold cures' and in the treatment of allergies (e.g. hayfever). -.
Most of this group of medicines tend to make the user feel drowsy, meaning that the use of
medicines containing anti-histamines is likely to be unacceptable when working as an aircraft
maintenance engineer.
, J
Cough suppressants are generally safe in normal use, but if an over-the-counter product
contains anti-histamine, decongestant, etc., the engineer should exercise caution about its use
when working. '. ~
Decongestants (i.e. treatments for nasal congestion) may contain chemicals such as pseudo-
ephedrine hydrochloride (e.g. 'Sudafed') and phenylphrine. Side-effects reported, are anxiety,
tremor, rapid pulse and headache. AWN47 forbids the use of medications containing this
!I ingredient to aircraft maintenance engineers when working, as the effects compromise skilled
'- performance.
T \
'Pep' pills are used to maintain wakefulness. They often contain caffeine, dexedrine or
benzedrine. Their use is often habit forming. Over-dosage may cause headaches, dizziness and
~' , mental disturbances. eMIP Leaflet 15-6 (previously published as Airworthiness Notice 47)
I states that "the use of 'pep' pills whilst working cannot be permitted. If coffee is insufficient, you
'-- are not fit for work."
! '
Sleeping tablets (often anti-histamine based) tend to slow reaction times and generally dull the
senses. The duration of effect is variable from person to person. Individuals should obtain
expert medical advice before taking them.
Melatonin (a natural hormone) deserves a special mention. Although not available without a
prescription in the UK, it is classed as a food supplement in the USA (and is readily available in
health food shops). It has been claimed to be effective as a sleep aid, and to help promote the
resynchronisation of disturbed circadian rhythms. Its effectiveness and safety are still yet to be
.
\
' proven and current best advice is to avoid this product.
If the aircraft maintenance engineer has any doubts about the suitability of working whilst taking
i' medication, he must seek appropriate professional advice.
Drugs
'- Illicit drugs such as ecstasy, cocaine and heroin all affect the central nervous system and impair
mental function. They are known to have significant effects upon performance and have no
place within the aviation maintenance environment. Of course, their possession and use are
also illegal in the UK.
( "
Smoking cannabis can subtly impair performance for up to 24 hours. In particular, it affects the
ability to concentrate, retain information and make reasoned judgments, especially on difficult
tasks.
Non-Prescribed Drugs
1
w Don't touch them,
r '
I
I Tobacco
\....0
Nothing good can be said about smoking. Smoking is detrimental to good health, both in the
, '
short term and in the long term. Smoking also significantly decreases a person's capacity to
,,I perform by reducing the amount of oxygen carried in the blood, replacing it with the useless and
'"-'
potentially poisonous by-products of cigarette smoke. A person does not have to be the active
, ' smoker to suffer the effects; smoke from any person in the cockpit (or anywhere in the aircraft, if
I it is small) will affect everyone.
L..
Carbon monoxide, which is present in cigarette smoke, is absorbed into the blood in preference
to oxygen. The maximum blood oxygen concentration for a smoker is 90 per cent of that for a
non-smoker. This means that, at sea level, a smoker is already as hypoxic as a non-smoker at
an altitude of about eight thousand feet. A smoker's night vision is affected by hypoxia, even at
sea level. Any oxygen deficiency reduces the body's ability to produce energy (and it affects
brain functions).
The level of carbon monoxide in the blood is measured by the carboxyhaemoglobin level •. J
(COHb). Smokers with a COHb of 5% are already equivalent to an altitude of 8,000 feet and, at
an actual cabin altitude of 5,000 feet, are at a personal altitude of 10,000 feet. (They should ,
already be on oxygen.) An average smoker will have a COHb level of 4-1 0%. A passive smoker •. ,..l
may be as high as 5%. It is now recognised that cigarette smoking plays a significant role in
cardiovascular (heart) diseases, cancer and other mental and physical diseases.
~,J
~
Most doctors will now tell you that whatever else you do for your health do not smoke. Besides,
it is unfair to threaten the health of those who choose not to. If you must smoke, smoke alone.
Medication
• _~I
g
;2 15
--
x
rc,
'. :
i
o 5 10
r "
!
'- Diet and Nutrition
, ' We are what we eat. Diet concerns what we eat, how rnuch and in what proportions, It receives
"
I
,-, much attention in the media these days because in Western society our dietary intake is poorly
managed: too much animal fat, too much processed sugar, too few vegetables, cereals and
( .
fruit. In all, too much quantity and too little activity,
i
'-
( "
Eating Habits/Patterns
We are habitual eaters. The suggested eating pattern is to have small, varied serves often
rather than sporadic large serves, Snacks, such as fruit, yoghurt, muesli bars and cereals keep
L. the hunger at bay and avoid the temptation to eat a large meal too quickly, Eating slowly allows
the digestive system to process the food and to feel satisfied with a lesser quantity.
,
u
Culture
r '
! : We are heavily influenced by the diet of our culture and our forebears, Some are very
Li favourable. Some are damaging. Our cuisine, style of cooking and the frequency and size of
meals are related to our upbringing, All affect our health, energy and well-being, The
Mediterranean cuisine is currently assessed as best: seafoods, salads, olive oil, fruit and time
spent enjoying it.
Nutrition
" ' Nutrition is fuel for the body and mind, We have discussed the importance of oxygen for
generation of energy, and there is a need for fuel in the form of nutrients, which the body
converts from the food we eat, and roughage, which is important for internal hygiene,
I
!
L.
,
L.
,
~
,
LJ
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance 4-45
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. (f.) f':nn\lrinht ?t"l1 n
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Meat
Choose lean lamb, beef and chicken, no skin on the chicken. Keep fatty bacon to a minimum.
Do not be too heavy on the sauces. Minimise preserved or processed meats, such as sausages
and hams. Women don't eat enough meat. Lean meat is the best source of protein and iron. n
__ .J
!
Fish
Oily fish/bluefish, sardines, kippers, herrings, salmon and tuna are marvelous. All grilled,
steamed or poached fish is great. Avoid fried, battered or crumbed as the coating collects the
fats and the calories.
Oils
Vegetable and fish oils are good. Olive oil is best but don't overheat when cooking. Limit
coconut and palm oils.
Legumes
Peas, and all types of beans, are good for you (pulsars). The cowboys' staple diet of baked
beans has much to be commended for it. Lentils are a good source of protein.
Salad
Any salad is wonderful if raw, fresh and clean. If you are sure of the source, eat lots. Watch the
dressings though. Light oil and vinegar is good. Mayonnaise not so. Moderate the additives
such as cheese, bacon, potatoes and eggs. Salad, fruit and vegetables protect against cancers '- ,)
1
and heart disease.
Vegetables
Vegetables should be undercooked and undressed, and steamed or stir-fried rather than boiled
to death - crunchy is good. Eat lots of them. Go .overboard. Spinach or silver beet is a good
source of iron. Have many different-coloured vegetables on your plate. Brighter-coloured
vegetables contain greater levels of anti-oxidants. These neutralise free radicals, the ageing
and health-threatening agents that encourage cancers and heart disease. Soups are a
wonderful way to serve fresh vegetables as the juices remain in the serve. Don't add too much
salt. Potatoes boost energy but only in the short term (that GI again). Rice has the same effect.
Avoid bulk quantities of either.
Fruit
Eat unlimited amounts, if fresh. Fruit is the best source of vitamins, energy and water and also
acts as anti-oxidants, especially red fruits, strawberries, and tomatoes. However, tropical fruits , i
increase blood supply quickly (GI) and lead to an immediate uplift that is short-lived. It is
followed by a loss of energy and concentration. They provide short-lived energy. "
" .J
Nuts
Nuts should be eaten sparingly - watch the oil and salt.
L.,
Carbohydrates - Fibre/Cereals/Grains/Rice
Bread is the staff of life Granular and unprocessed is best with oil rather than butter.
c. Rice and potatoes are good - steamed or boiled rather than fried. However, large amounts of
I rice or potatoes act to rapidly build the glycaemic level (blood sugar), but there follows a sudden
L.,
let-down. Ever feel hungry and weak not long after a rice meal? It is doubly negative when it
happens halfway into a long flight sector.
Additionally, watch the sauce, cheese and butter.
,,
Milk and Dairy Products
Choose the low-fatlhigh-calcium versions. Restrict intake to small amounts of good cheese. Use
f ; vegetable oil or margarine in preference to butter. Low-salt, low-fat versions should be selected.
I Yoghurt
L...
Yoghurt is excellent. Natural unsweetened varieties are best. Acidophilus is an important
r '~ element in the functioning of the bowel. Some yoghurts culture forms of this essential bacterium
(e.g. lactobacillus).
Eggs
Cholesterol is high in egg yolk so keep to only two or three eggs a week. Poached or boiled is
better than fried. Omelettes and custards can be high in egg content. Nevertheless, eggs are
,. good food.
'-
Snacks
Fresh fruit is best, or vegetables (celery, carrots, etc.), yoghurt, dry biscuits, or small amounts of
nuts or seeds. Health bars are okay. No chips, hot or cold, in any guise.
much. It does take time to lower the salt level as meals initially taste less flavoured. It's like ,
giving up sugar or stopping smoking: our taste buds adjust and we eventually appreciate the ,J
taste of the actual ingredients. There is enough salt naturally in all food. If there is a need for
supplementary salt to replace that lost by perspiration, for example, in the tropics or when
exercising severely, then the doctor will prescribe it.
Sugar
Minimise your intake of unprocessed sugar - preferably none. Eat sweet fruit rather than
chocolate. Bananas are great.
Fast Foods/Take-Away .. J
Have lots of salad or coleslaw and less of the bread, butter and fries. Tomato sauce is good.
Have chicken without the skin. Sandwiches are good if you choose the right contents. Grainy
,
bread and no butter is ideal. '. ,
-,
-;
!
I
"' )
Drinking Habits
r : Soft Drinks
The mineral-enriched health drinks are for athletes. Use them for severe exercise; otherwise,
drink straight mineral water. Avoid sweet, sticky, sugary soft drinks. They make you even
thirstier.
,
'-
Tea and Coffee
r ' Caffeine is a drug and a stimulant. Coffee has most (especially expresso). Excess caffeine
increases pulse rate, prevents sleep, increases urination and therefore fluid loss (it is a diuretic),
causes headaches and increases the level of stress. It may wake you up but it won't let you
rest. Keep caffeine to a minimum (one or two cups a day) and drink plenty of water.
Dehydration
I . Fatigue is an industry problem that we are finally just beginning to come to grips with. It is a
,
problem that our industry has vastly underestimated and that we have vastly overestimated our
'-'
ability to cope with.
:
i
L
Well, now it appears that we have a further problem that both we and the industry are totally
: ignorant of - at least I sure was - dehydration. Dehydration has the ability to induce fatigue
:
L with the resulting reduction in judgment - all without us even being aware of it. Let's start with
a few interesting facts:
'--' 1. Our body is made up of about 60 percent water (women a little less than men for some
reason).
,
r 2. Our brain is made up of 85 percent water and requires a very narrow range of water
,,
content to remain at its peak.
3. We lose about 8 to 10 cups, or just over 2 litres of water per normal day through
,, breathing, urinating, perspiring, and bowel movements.
I
L 4. Without water, we can live about 3 days.
5. If working outside on a hot day, we can lose about two pounds or one litre of water per
I hour.
L 6. Doctors now say that a whopping 75 percent of people don't have enough water, which
translates to - dehydration.
,
,
,
c...;
r- ~
, j
Dr. F. Batmanghelidj, in his book Your Body's Many Cries for Water, states that in over one-third ~
of us (37 percent), the thirst mechanism is so weak that it's often mistaken for hunger. It is only ,,
r
when we are moderately dehydrated, (6 to 10 percent) that we begin to pay attention to our " ~
thirst. By that time, our mental alertness has dropped dramatically. As dehydration becomes
severe, the person slips into a coma and if the cardiovascular system collapses, the person
dies.
Putting two percent into perspective: A 150 lb. person would need to lose only 1.8 Ibs. of water ~
\
to be two percent dehydrated. On a hot day, you can lose that in less than an hour. If, as they
'-. J
say, 75 percent of us are chronically dehydrated, then we may be looking at a major
contributing factor to maintenance errors - and we don't even know it!
A more accurate figure calls for taking your body weight in pounds and dividing that number in "~
,,
\
half. That result is the ounces of water that you require daily. To that, add 12- to 16-oz. for hot,
dry weather and a further 12- to 16-oz. if you are doing strenuous physical work.
This is considered a minimum to be sure that you are not dehydrated. Drinking more than that
will do no harm as the kidneys maintain the correct water content and will simply "expel" the
excess. This excess is thought to help flush out the toxins or at least dilute them, and can
,
reduce the chances of colon cancer by possibly 45 percent and bladder cancer by 50 percent. .. J
Perspiring heavily will require replenishment of some essential body salts that are being lost-
sodium, potassium, calcium bicarbonate and phosphate. Salt tablets will help, as will some
vitamin tablets.
~
. J
I
, \
4-50 Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 20tO on page 2 of this chapter.
i'
L
Integrated Training System
i Designed in association with the
'-- club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
There are many sport drinks on the market that offer replenishment of these salts. If you want to
make your own "tonic," here is a recipe that will work:
1 litter (or quart) of water
Pinch of salt
75 ml (1/3cup) of sugar*
100 ml (1/2 cup) of orange juice
I'
" I
!....
*Add an optional drink crystal packet of any flavour you want. If it has sugar already added, then
skip the sugar listed above. If you have a blender, you can even blend in a banana to help
balance the potassium.
Now, if you're working out in the heat, you will need to drink at least one of these per hour just
to keep balanced. You should also be drinking fluid about every 20 minutes in these conditions.
L Give this article some serious thought and remember; if we are to reduce maintenance errors
we have to use all means possible. Dehydration is an easy one to fix - let's at least eliminate
r' this potential source of error. While the industry may not, at least your body will thank you for it.
I,
c...;
, .
,,
r•
I
1
'-
f :
L
,
i I
,.
I,
1
, J
· J
n
•
I
I
,_ .J
i
, I
~.J
i
·I
ro,
)
~_ .J
4-52 Module 9.4 Factors Affecting Performance
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
, ,
,r '
'
I '
'-
: '
'-'
r '
,
"
'-
, '
; ,
'-
r '
I
'-' Module 9
, ,
,, '
,
'-
r ;
Human Factors
,
'-
,
I
'
'-
, '
i :
'-'
[ ,
I '
,
'-'
I '
I
L.
,
,
'
" '
'-'
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9,5 Physical Environment 5-1
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
r ' on page 2 of this chapter. © Cnnvriaht 201 n
, :
,
Copyright Notice
© Copyright. All worldwide rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any other means whatsoever: i.e.
photocopy, electronic, mechanical recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of
Total Training Support Ltd.
, .J
Basic knowledge for categories A, B1 and B2 are indicated by the allocation of knowledge levels indicators (1, 2 or
3) against each applicable subject. Category C applicants must meet either the category B1 or the category B2
basic knowledge levels. L J
The knowledge level indicators are defined as follows:
LEVEL 1
• A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
, }
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
, J
LEVEL 2
• A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• An ability to apply that knowledge.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
".
l -'
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the L. ,
subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
LEVEL 3
• A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
• The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
• The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
• The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
• The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
• The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
,
L.,
Table of Contents
I •
,, .
I .
i '
,.
,
I ,
( ,
I .
r '
, .
I •
~
,
Module 9.5 Enabling Objectives ,, ,"
Objective EASA 66 Reference Level
Illumination; "
, J
i
Working environment
" j
,~ )
,
~ _J
,
I
, _J
, ;
~_ J
,
c )
" 1
L J
,~
., ,,
,.,
, )
'-'
Chapter 9.5 Physical Environment
! . The aircraft maintenance engineer can expect to work in a variety of different environments,
from 'line' (generally outside the hangar) to 'base' (usually inside a hangar or workshop), in all
types of weather and climatic conditions, day and night. This depends largely on the company
I ' he works for, and the function he fulfils in the company. Both physical environments have their
I own specific features or factors that may impinge on human performance. This chapter
L...,
considers the impact of noise, fumes, illumination, climate and temperature, motion and
i . vibration, as well as the requirement to work in confined spaces and issues associated with the
i general working environment.
~
,,
,
I
c'
, '
r •
i •
!
'---
1
w
I .
I
r .
i
'-
r .
, '
Noise
The impact of noise on human performance has already been discussed in Chapter 2, when
examining 'hearing'. To recap, noise in the workplace can have both short-term and long-term
negative effects: it can be annoying, can interfere with verbal communication and mask
warnings, and it can damage workers' hearing (either temporarily or permanently). It was noted c-,
that the ear is sensitive to sounds between certain frequencies (20 HZ to 20 KHz) and that
: J
intensity of sound is measured in decibels (dB), where exposure in excess of 115 dB without
ear protection even for a short duration is not recommended. This equates to standing within a
few hundred metres of a moving jet aircraft.
Noise can be thought of as any unwanted sound, especially if it is loud, unpleasant and
annoying.
General background noise can be 'filtered out' by the brain through focused attention (as noted
in Chapter 2). Otherwise, for more problematic noise, some form of hearing protection (e.g. ear
plugs and ear muffs) is commonly used by aircraft maintenance engineers, both on the line and
in the hangar, to help the engineer to concentrate. ..,
!
The noise environment in which the aircraft maintenance engineer works can vary considerably.
For instance, the airport ramp or apron area is clearly noisy, due to running aircraft engines or --;
auxiliary power units (APUs), moving vehicles and so on. It is not unusual for this to exceed 85 i ;
._ .1
dB - 90 dB which can cause hearing damage if the time of exposure is prolonged. The hangar
area can also be noisy, usually due to the use of various tools during aircraft maintenance.
Short periods of intense noise are not uncommon here and can cause temporary hearing loss.
Engineers may move to and from these noisy areas into the relative quiet of rest rooms, aircraft
,,
cabins, stores and offices. ,
I
J
c. J
It is very important that aircraft maintenance engineers remain aware of the extent of the noise
around them. It is likely that some form of hearing protection should be carried with them at all
times and, as a rule of thumb, used when remaining in an area where normal speech cannot be '-. J
In their day-to-day work, aircraft maintenance engineers will often need to discuss matters
relating to a task with colleagues and also, at the end of a shift, handover to an incoming
engineer. Clearly, in both cases it is important that noise does not impair their ability to
: J
communicate, as this could obviously have a bearing on the successful completion of the task
(i.e. safety). Common sense dictates that important matters are discussed away from noisy
areas. , ,
:. ,j
'\
L. ,j
Fumes
By its nature, the maintenance of aircraft involves working with a variety of fluids and chemical
substances. For instance, engineers may come across various lubricants (oils and greases),
hydraulic fluids, paints, cleaning compounds and solder. They will also be exposed to aircraft
r ; fuel and exhaust. In fact, there is every possibility that an engineer could be exposed to a
!
L... number of these at anyone time in the workplace. Each substance gives off some form of
vapour or fumes which can be inhaled by the aircraft maintenance engineer. Some fumes will
( ,
be obvious as a result of their odour, whereas others have no smell to indicate their presence.
Some substances will be benign most of the time, but may, in certain circumstances, produce
fumes (e.g. overheated grease or oils, smoldering insulation).
Fumes can cause problems for engineers mainly as a result of inhalation, but they can also
cause other problems, such as eye irritation. The problem may be exacerbated in aircraft
maintenance engineering by the confined spaces in which work must sometimes be carried out
(e.g. fuel tanks). Here the fumes cannot dissipate easily and it may be appropriate to use
breathing apparatus.
It may not always be practical to eradicate fumes from the aircraft maintenance engineer's work
place, but where possible, steps should be taken to minimise them. It is also common sense
that if noxious fumes are detected, an engineer should immediately inform his colleagues and
supervisor so that the area can be evacuated and suitable steps taken to investigate the source
and remove them.
i '
Apart from noxious fumes that have serious health implications and must be avoided, working in
,.
, the presence of fumes can affect an engineer's performance, as he may rush a job in order to
I
escape them. If the fumes are likely to have this effect, the engineer should increase the
'- ventilation locally or use breathing apparatus to dissipate the fumes.
( .
r -,
'-'
( :
( .
r -,
,I
'-'
r '
!
t" )
C_ -'
, ,)
.,- )
'- -}
: J
c :
Intentionally Blank
, .J
", I
'~ J
5-8 Module 9.5 Physical Environment Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
on page 2 of this chapter.
© Copyright 201 0
Integrated Training System
Designed !n association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
i .
,
Illumination
In order that aircraft maintenance engineers are able to carry out their work safely and
efficiently, it is imperative that their work be conducted under proper lighting conditions. It was
noted in Chapter 2, that the cones in the retina of the eye require good light to resolve fine
i ' detail. Furthermore, colour vision requires adequate light to stimulate the cones. Inappropriate
or insufficient lighting can lead to mistakes in work tasks or can increase the time required to do
the work.
Illumination refers to the lighting both within the general working environment and also in the
locality of the engineer and the task he is carrying out. It can be defined as the amount of light
,. striking a surface.
i
L
, . When working outside during daylight, the engineer may have sufficient natural light to see
well by. It is possible however that he may be in shadow (possibly caused by the aircraft) or a
building. Similarly, cramped equipment compartments will not be illuminated by ambient hangar
lighting. In these cases, additional local artificial lighting is usually required (known as task
r •
I
lighting). At night, aerodromes may appear to be awash with floodlights and other aerodrome
lighting, but these are unlikely to provide sufficient illumination for an engineer to be able to see
what he is doing when working on an aircraft. These lights are not designed and placed for this
r ' purpose. Again, additional local artificial lighting is needed, which may be nothing more than a
I
L good torch (i.e. one which does not have a dark area in the centre of the beam). However, the
drawback of a torch, is that it leaves the engineer with only one hand available with which to
work. A light mounted on a headband gets round this problem.
,.
A torch can be very useful to the engineer,but Murphy's Law dictates that the torch batteries
L will run down when the engineer is across the airfield from the stores. It is much wiser to carry a
,. spare set of batteries than 'take a chance' by attempting a job without enough light.
I
Within the hangar, general area lighting tends to be some distance from the aircraft on which an
,. engineer might work, as it is usually attached to the very high ceiling of these buildings. This
r makes these lights hard to reach, meaning that they tend to get dusty, making them less
'-
effective and, in addition, failed bulbs tend not to be replaced as soon as they go out. In
! ' general, area lighting in hangars is unlikely to be as bright as natural daylight and, as a
consequence, local task lighting is often needed, especially for work of a precise nature
(particularly visual inspection tasks).
r 1
1
An extract from the NTSB report on the Northwest Airlines accident at Tokyo, 1994, illustrates
these points:
j
"The Safety Board believes that the "OK to Close" inspector was hindered considerably by the '- )
environment of the pylon area. He indicated, for example, that the combination of location of the
scaffolding (at a level just below the underside of the wing that forced him into unusual and :
uncomfortable physical positions) and inadequate lighting from the base of the scaffolding up ,- )
toward the pylon, hampered his inspection efforts. Moreover, the underside of the pylon was
illuminated by portable fluorescent lights that had been placed along the floor of the scaffolding.
These lights had previously been used in areas where airplanes were painted, and, as a result,
had been covered with the residue of numerous paint applications that diminished their
brightness. These factors combined to cause the inspector to view the fuse pin retainers by
holding onto the airplane structure with one hand, leaning under the bat wing doors at an angle
of at least 30°, holding a flashlight with the other hand pointing to the area, and moving his head
awkwardly to face up into the pylon area." , )
It is also important that illumination is available where the engineer needs it (Le. both in the ,-,
,
hangar and one the line). Any supplemental task lighting must be adequate in terms of its ~ .J
,
brightness for the task at hand, which is best judged by the engineer. When using task lighting,
it should be placed close to the work being done, but should not be in the engineer's line of
sight as this will result in direct glare. It must also be arranged so that it does not reflect off
surfaces near where the engineer is working causing indirect or reflected glare. Glare of either
kind will be a distraction from the task and may cause mistakes. ~
, ,
L J
Poor ambient illumination of work areas has been identified as a significant deficiency during
the investigation of certain engineering incidents. It is equally important that lighting in ancillary
areas, such as offices and stores, is good.
The MIB report for the BAC 1-11 accident says of the unmanned stores area: "The ambient
illumination in this area was poor and the Shift Maintenance Manager had to interpose himself ~. j
between the carousel and the light source to gain access to the relevant carousel drawers. He
did not use the drawer labels, even though he now knew the part number of the removed bolt,
but identified what he thought were identical bolts by placing the bolts together and comparing
them." He also failed to make use of his spectacles.
Relying on touch when lighting is poor is no substitute for actually being able to see what you
are doing. If necessary, tools such as mirrors and borescopes may be needed to help the
engineer see into remote areas.
'• . J
-,
. i,
'. ]
As has been noted throughout this document, aircraft maintenance engineers routinely work
both within the hangar and outside. Clearly, exposure to the widest range of temperature and
climate is likely to be encountered outdoors. Here, an engineer may have to work in direct
summer sun, strong winds, heavy rain, high humidity, or in the depths of winter. Although
hangars must exclude inclement weather, they can be cold and draughty, especially if the
hangar doors have to remain open.
EASA Part-145 AMC 145.25 (c) states: "Hangars used to house aircraft together with office
accommodation should be such as to ensure the working environment permits personnel to
carry out work tasks in an effective manner. Temperatures should be maintained such that
personnel can carry out required tasks without undue discomfort."
, .
Performance Good Performance
Te mperal1lrel
Climate
Engineers cannot be expected to maintain the rigorous standards expected in their profession in
all environmental conditions. EASA Part-145 Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) 145.25(c)
requires that environmental conditions be adequate for work to be carried out, stating:
"The working environment for line maintenance should be such that the particular maintenance
or inspection task can be carried out without undue distraction. It therefore follows that where
the working environment deteriorates to an unacceptable level in respect of temperature,
moisture, hail, ice, snow, wind, light, dust/other airborne contamination, the particular
maintenance or inspection tasks should be suspended until satisfactory conditions are re-
established"
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Unfortunately, in reality, pressure to turn aircraft round rapidly means that some maintenance
tasks are not put off until the conditions are more conducive to work.
There was an instance in Scotland, where work on an aircraft was only suspended when it
became so cold that the lubricants being used actually froze.
, l
Environmental conditions can affect physical performance. For example, cold conditions make
numb fingers, reducing the engineer's ability to carry out fiddly repairs, and working in strong
winds can be distracting, especially if having to work at height (e.g. on staging). Extreme
environmental conditions may also be fatiguing, both physically and mentally.
There are no simple solutions to the effects of temperature and climate on the engineer. For
example, an aircraft being turned around on the apron cannot usually be moved into the hangar
so that the engineer avoids the worst of the weather. In the cold, gloves can be worn, but
obviously the gloves themselves may interfere with fine motor skills. In the direct heat of the sun
or driving rain, it is usually impossible to set up a temporary shelter when working outside.
~
i
Vibration in aircraft maintenance engineering is usually associated with the use of rotating or
percussive tools and ancillary equipment, such as generators. Low frequency noise, such as
that associated with aircraft engines, can also cause vibration. Vibration between 0.5 Hz to 20
Hz is most problematic, as the human body absorbs most of the vibratory energy in this range.
The range between 50-150 Hz is most troublesome for the hand and is associated with
Vibratory-induced White Finger Syndrome (VWF). Pneumatic tools can produce troublesome
vibrations in this range and frequent use can lead to reduced local blood flow and pain
associated with VWF. Vibration can be annoying, possibly disrupting an engineer's
concentration.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Intentionally Blank
I
I
I
I
• I
I
I
I
I
5-14 Module 9.5 Physical Environment Use and/or disclosure is
I
ITS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
I
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
ciub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Confined Spaces
Chapter 2 highlighted the possibility of claustrophobia being a problem in aircraft maintenance
engineering. Working in any confined space, especially with limited means of entry or exit (e.g.
fuel tanks) needs to be managed carefully. As noted previously, engineers should ideally work
with a colleague who would assist their ingress into and egress out of the confined space. Good
,
~
illumination and ventilation within the confined space will reduce any feelings of discomfort. In
addition, appropriate safety equipment, such as breathing apparatus or lines must be used
when required.
.,
Intentionally Blank
• J
Working Environment
Various factors that impinge upon the engineer's physical working environment have been
highlighted in this chapter. Apart from those already discussed, other physical influences
include:
• workplace layout and the cleanliness and general tidiness of the workplace (e.g. storage
facilities for tools, manuals and information, a means of checking that all tools have been
retrieved from the aircraft, etc.);
• the proper provision and use of safety equipment and signage (such as non-slip
surfaces, safety harnesses, etc.);
• the storage and use of toxic chemical and fluids (as distinct from fumes) (e.g. avoiding
confusion between similar looking canisters and containers by clear labeling or storage in
different locations, etc.).
To some extent, some or all of the factors associated with the engineer's workplace may affect
his ability to work safely and efficiently. EASA Part-145.25(c) - Facility Requirements states:
"The working environment must be appropriate for the task carried out and in particular special
requirements observed. Unless otherwise dictated by the particular task environment, the
working environment must be such that the effectiveness of personnel is not impaired."
The working environment comprises the physical environment encapsulated in this chapter,
the social environment described in Chapter 3 and the tasks that need to be carried out
(examined in the next chapter). This is shown in Figure 5.2. Each of these three components of
the working environment interact, for example:
r •
,
~
Social Environment
(Individual & team responsibility,
motivation, culture, management,
supervision, leadership, etc.)
Physical Environment
(Noise, illumination, fumes, Task
climate, temperature, motion, •. j
Working Environment
, ,
Aircraft maintenance engineering requires all three components of the working environment to
be managed carefully in order to achieve a safe and efficient system
It is important to recognise that engineers are typically highly professional and pragmatic in their
outlook, and generally attempt to do the best work possible regardless of their working
environment. Good maintenance organisations do their best to support this dedication by
providing the necessary conditions for safe and efficient work.
, ,
· i
· )
· J
i
~
TTS Integrated
Training System
Module 9
Human Factors
9.6 Tasks
, '
,"
~
,
,
Copyright Notice
© Copyright. All worldwide rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any other means whatsoever: i.e.
photocopy, electronic, mechanical recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of
Total Training Support Ltd.
,. '
)
LEVEL 1
• A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
,
• The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and "
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
• A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• An ability to apply that knowledge.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
LEVEL 3
• A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
• The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
• The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
• The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
• The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
• The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
,
. )
6-2 Module 9.6 Tasks Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
'c-
,'
, Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
L club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
r '
;
'-'
Table of Contents
,, '
"-
Chapter 9.6 Tasks 5
, '
Physical Work 7
Planning 7
Physical Tasks 8
Repetitive Tasks 9
~
Visual Inspection 11
Complex Systems 13
c~
r '
r '
r '
Repetitive tasks;
Visual inspection;
Complex systems;
I.j
, '
EASA Part-66
r .
Examination to
become a certifying
(Licenced) eng ine er
{ {
Figure 6.1: Routes to becoming a Licensed Aircraft Engineer
As a self starter, training is obtained mainly on-the-job, whereas an approved course is largely
classroom-based with a condensed on-the-job element. Given the varied nature of the
maintenance tasks in aircraft maintenance, few engineers are 'jacks of all trades'. Most
engineers opt to specialise in the tasks they carry out, either as an Airframe and Powerplant
r. specialist, or as an Avionics specialist (both disciplines include Electrical tasks).
i
L
When working within an aircraft maintenance organisation, an engineer will also be sent on
r ' 'type courses'. These courses provide the engineer with requisite skills and knowledge to carry
i
out tasks on specific aircraft, engines or aircraft systems.
The rest of this chapter examines the nature of the tasks that aircraft maintenance engineers
carry out, looking at the physical work, repetitive tasks, visual inspection and the complex
systems that they work on.
i '
,
L
! -,
i
L
1
, I
Intentionally Blank
, ,
,,
i
. ,!
• J
l )
Physical Work
! '
Planning
! ' Blindly starting a task without planning how best to do it is almost certainly the best way to
L invite problems, Before commencing a task, an individual engineer, engineering team or planner
should ask themselves a number of questions, These may include:
, '
,, , • Are the resources available to do it effectively (safely, accurately and within the time
i
permitted)? Where resources include:
o personnel;
o equipmenUspares;
o documentation, information and guidance;
o facilities such as hangar space, lighting, etc.
! '
i
L... • Do IIwe have the skills and proficiency necessary to complete the task?
,.
Information about specific tasks should be detailed on job cards or task sheets. These will
indicate the task (e.g. checks or inspection, repair, replacement, overhaul) and often further
details to aid the engineer (such as maintenance manual references, part numbers, etc.),
If the engineer is in any doubt what needs to be done, written guidance material is the best
resource, Colleagues may unintentionally give incorrect or imprecise direction (the exception to
this is discussing problems that arise that are not covered in the guidance material),
It is generally the shift supervisor's job to ensure that the resources are available for his staff to
f '
I
carry out their tasks. As noted in Chapter 3, (Time Pressure and Deadlines'), it is likely that,
within a shift or a team, various sub-tasks are allocated to individuals by the supervisor.
i ' Alternatively, he may encourage a team to take ownership of the tasks that need to be
completed, giving them the discretion to manage a package of work (as noted in Chapter 3,
(Team Working'), Exactly 'who does what' is likely to be based on factors such as individuals'
! ' specialisation (Le. mechanical or avionics) and their experience with the task.
L Although management have a responsibility to ensure that their engineers have suitable
! ' training, at the end of the day, it is up to the individual engineer to decide whether he has the
I
L
necessary skills and has the proficiency and experience to do what he has been asked to do,
He should not be afraid to voice any misgivings, although it is recognised that peer and
management pressure may make this difficult.
, '
i '
L
L...
r'
L 6-7
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9,6 Tasks
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © r:nnvrinht ?n1n
Integrated Training System :
Designed in association with the l !
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Physical Tasks c ,
Aircraft maintenance engineering is a relatively active occupation. Regardless of the job being
done, most tasks tend to have elements of fine motor control, requiring precision, as well as I
activities requiring strength and gross manipulation. · ,I
From a biomechanical perspective, the human body is a series of physical links (bones) ::
connected at certain points Uoints) that allow various movements. Muscles provide the motive ·i )
force for all movements, both fine and gross. This is known as the musculoskeletal system.
The force that can be applied in any given posture is dependent on the strength available from
muscles and the mechanical advantage provided by the relative positions of the load, muscle
connections, and joints.
As an engineer gets older, the musculoskeletal system stiffens and muscles become weaker.
Injuries become more likely and take longer to heal. Staying in shape will minimize the effects of
ageing, but they still occur.
., I
· J
It is important that maintenance tasks on aircraft are within the physical limitations of aircraft
maintenance engineers. Boeing use a computerised tool, based on human performance data l
(body sizes, strengths, leverages, pivots, etc.), to ensure that modern aircraft are designed such
that the majority of maintenance engineers will be able to access aircraft equipment, apply the ~
!
necessary strength to loosen or tighten objects, etc. (i.e. designed for ease of maintainability).
Clearly we are all different in terms of physical stature and strength and as a consequence, our ~
I
physical limitations vary. Attempting to lift a heavy object which is beyond our physical
capabilities is likely to lead to injury. The use of tools generally make tasks easier, and in some
situations, may make a task achievable that was hitherto outside our physical powers (e.g.
lifting an aircraft panel with the aid of a hoist). · . I
As noted in Chapter 4, ('Fatigue'), physical work over a period of time will result in fatigue. This
is normally not a problem if there is adequate rest and recovery time between work periods. It
can, however, become a problem if the body is not allowed to recover, possibly leading to
illness or injuries. Hence, engineers should try to take their allocated breaks.
Missing a break in an effort to get a job done within a certain time frame can be
counterproductive, as fatigue diminishes motor skills, perception, awareness and standards. As
a consequence, work may slow and mistakes may occur that need to be rectified.
As discussed at some length in Chapter 4, ('Day-to-Day Fitness and Health'), it is very important
that engineers should try to ensure that their physical fitness is good enough for the type of
tasks which they normally do.
Repetitive Tasks
Repetitive tasks can be tedious and reduce arousal (Le. be boring). Most of the human factors
research associated with repetitive tasks has been carried out in manufacturing environments
where workers carry out the same action many times a minute. This does not generally apply to
i . maintenance engineering.
!
'-
Repetitive tasks in aircraft maintenance engineering typically refer to tasks that are performed
.
!
' several times during a shift, or a number of times during a short time period, e.g. in the course
of a week. An example of this would be the checking life jackets on an aircraft during daily
inspections.
L The main danger with repetitive tasks is that engineers may become so practised at such tasks
that they may cease to consult the maintenance manual, or to use job cards. Thus, if something
r •
about a task is changed, the engineer may not be aware of the change. Complacency is also a
danger, whereby an engineer may skip steps or fail to give due attention to steps in a
procedure, especially if it is to check something which is rarely found to be wrong, damaged or
out of tolerance. This applies particularly to visual inspection, which is covered in greater detail
L in the next section.
In the Aloha accident report, the NTSB raised the problem of repetitive tasks:
L
"The concern was expressed about what kinds of characteristics are appropriate to consider
I' when selecting persons to perform an obviously tedious, repetitive task such as a protracted
L NDI inspection. Inspectors normally come up through the seniority ranks. If they have the
desire, knowledge and skills, they bid on the position and are selected for the inspector job on
I
that basis. However, to ask a technically knowledgeable person to perform an obviously tedious
L and exceedingly boring task, rather than to have him supervise the quality of the task, may not
r ' be an appropriate use of personnel..."
Making assumptions along the lines of 'Oh I've done that job dozens of times!' can occur even
r ' if a task has not been undertaken for some time. It is always advisable to be wary of changes to
procedures or parts, remembering that 'familiarity breeds contempt'.
r '
i
~
,, '
L 6-9
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.6 Tasks
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
r' on page 2 of this chapter. (C) r.nnvrinht ?n1 n
Integrated Training System "
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
.,
· ,
'.
I l
,,
·,
,
'- )
I l
, j
• j
!
, J
-,
Visual Inspection
Visual inspection is one of the primary methods employed during maintenance to ensure the
,f aircraft remains in an airworthy condition.
L
, ' Visual inspection can be described as the process of using the eye, alone or in conjunction with
various aids to examine and evaluate the condition of systems or components of an aircraft.
i' Aircraft maintenance engineers may use magnifiers and borescopes to enhance their visual
capabilities. The engineer may accompany his visual inspection by examining the element using
his other senses (touch, hearing, smell, etc,). He may also manipulate the element being
inspected to make further judgments about its condition. For instance, he might feel a surface
for unevenness, or push against it to look for any unanticipated movement.
,
I
'
As highlighted in Chapter 2, ("Vision and the Aircraft Maintenance Engineer"), good eyesight is
I
~ of prime importance in visual inspection, and it was noted that the UK CAA have provided some
guidance on eyesight in CAAIP Leaflet 15-6 (previously published as Airworthiness Notice 47),
I ' Amongst other things, this calls for glasses or contact lenses to be used where prescribed and
regular eyesight checks to be made.
Visual inspection is often the principal method used to identify degradation or defect in systems
or components of aircraft. Although the engineer's vision is important, he also has to make
judgments about what he sees. To do this, he brings to bear training, experience and common
sense. Thus, reliable visual inspection requires that the engineer first sees the defect and then
actually recognises that it is a defect. Of course, experience comes with practice, but tell tale
signs to look for can be passed on by more experienced colleagues.
Information such as technical bulletins is important as they prime the inspector of known and
potential defects and he should keep abreast of these. For example, blue staining on an aircraft
fuselage may be considered insignificant at first sight, but information from a Technical Bulletin
of 'blue ice' and external toilet leaks may rnake the engineer suspicious of a more serious
problem
There are various steps that an engineer can take to help him carry out a reliable visual
r • inspection. The engineer should:
! .
• ensure that he understands the area, component or system he has been asked to
,. inspect (e,g. as specified on the work card);
L •
•
locate the corresponding area, component or system on the aircraft itself;
make sure the environment is conducive to the visual inspection task (considering factors
described in Chapter 5 - "Physical Environment", such as lighting, access, etc.);
• conduct a systematic visual search, rnoving his eyes carefully in a set pattern so that all
parts are inspected;
• examine thoroughly any potential degradation or defect that is seen and decide whether
L it constitutes a problem;
• record any problem that is found and continue the search a few steps prior to where he
left off.
Engineers may find it beneficial to take short breaks between discrete visual inspection tasks,
such as at a particular system component, frame, lap joint, etc. This is much better than pausing
midway through an inspection.
,
, :
The Aloha accident highlights what can happen when visual inspection is poor. The accident ~ J
report included two findings that suggest visual inspection was one of the main contributors to
the accident:
"There are human factors issues associated with visual and non-destructive inspection which
can degrade inspector performance to the extent that theoretically detectable damage is
overlooked. "
"Aloha Airlines management failed to recognise the human performance factors of inspection
~_ .J
and to fully motivate and focus their inspector force toward the critical nature of lap joint
inspection, corrosion control and crack detection ..... "
Finally, non-destructive inspection (NOI) includes an element of visual inspection, but usually
permits detection of defects below visual thresholds. Various specialist tools are used for this
purpose, such as the use of eddy currents and fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI). l-,
•.. j
6-12
. ,i
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
r ' Integrated Training System
i'- Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Complex Systems
r' All large modern aircraft can be described as complex systems, Within these aircraft, there are
,
L.,
a myriad of separate systems, many of which themselves may be considered complex, e.g.
flying controls, landing gear, air conditioning, flight management computers. Table 6.1 gives an
.,
,
' example of the breadth of complexity in aircraft systems .
L
Any complex system can be thought of as having a wide variety of inputs. The system typically
performs complex modifications on these inputs or the inputs trigger complex responses, There
!
L may be a single output, or many distributed outputs from the system.
i The purpose, composition and function of a simple system is usually easily understood by an
L aircraft maintenance engineer. In other words, the system is transparent to him. Fault finding
and diagnosis should be relatively simple with such systems (although appropriate manuals etc.
r '
should be referred to where necessary).
L
With a complex system, it should still be clear to an aircraft maintenance engineer what the
,r ' system's purpose is. However, its composition and function may be harder to conceptualise - it
I
L-
is opaque to the engineer.
r '
i
To maintain such complex systems, it is likely that the engineer will need to have carried out
some form of system-specific training which would have furnished him with an understanding of
how it works (and how it can fail) and what it is made up of (and how components can fail). It is
important that the engineer understands enough about the overall functioning of a large,
complex aircraft, but not so much that he is overwhelmed by its complexity, Thus, system-
specific training must achieve the correct balance between detailed system knowledge and
analytical troubleshooting skills.
l
,,r •
L-
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.6 Tasks 6-13
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
r ",
on page 2 of this chapter. © Convriaht 2010
L ;
With complex systems within aircraft, written procedures and reference material become an
even more important source of guidance than with simple systems. They may describe
comprehensively the method of performing maintenance tasks, such as inspections,
adjustments and tests. They may describe the relationship of one system to other systems and
often, most importantly, provide cautions or bring attention to specific areas or components. It is , j
important to follow the procedures to the letter, since deviations from procedures may have
implication on other parts of the system of which the engineer may be unaware.
~ j
When working with complex systems, it is important that the aircraft maintenance engineer
makes reference to appropriate guidance material. This typically breaks down the system
., ,I
conceptually or physically, making it easier to understand and work on.
In modern aircraft, it is likely that the expertise to maintain a complex system may be distributed
among individual engineers. Thus, avionics engineers and mechanical engineers may need to
work in concert to examine completely a system that has an interface to the pilot in the cockpit
(such as the undercarriage controls and indications).
: .J
A single modern aircraft is complex enough, but many engineers are qualified on several types -,
and variants of aircraft. This will usually mean that he has less opportunity to become familiar I,
, J
with one type, making it even more important that he sticks to the prescribed procedures and
refers to the reference manual wherever necessary. There is a particular vulnerability where
tasks are very similar between a number of different aircraft (e.g. spoiler systems on the A320,
, J
8757 and 8767), and may be more easily confused if no reference is made to the manual.
'1
, "i
i I
, J
r .
( .
,
'-
I ,
i
I
!
• TTS Integrated
Training System
r
,
'-'
r "
Module 9
r ,
,
i,
~
'
Human Factors
! 1
!
'-
r .
,
9.7 Communication
,
w
r '
I
r '
I
,
'-'
r '
r
,
'
t 1
Copyright Notice
© Copyright. All worldwide rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any other means whatsoever: i.e.
photocopy, electronic, mechanical recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of
Total Training Support Ltd.
LEVEL 1
L .J
• A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
"
LEVEL 2
• A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
,
• An ability to apply that knowledge. , I
Objectives:
• The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
LEVEL 3
• A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
• The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
• The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
• The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
• The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
• J
• The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
, i
~ J
c- Table of Contents
r '
r •
, .
!
{ .
, ,
Dissemination of information;
l. )
,
, J
, ,,
L. ,';
, .J
,
, j
:
,
l ;
.. J
I
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
L club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
, '
Chapter 9.7 Communication
Good communication is important in every industry. In aircraft maintenance engineering, it is
i
~
vital. Communication, or more often a breakdown in communication, is often cited as a
contributor to aviation incidents and accidents. It is for this very reason that it has its own
r ' section in the EASA Part-66 Module 9 for Human Factors. This chapter examines the various
aspects of communication that affect the aircraft maintenance engineer.
be a message, a signal, a meaning, etc. In order to have communication both the transmitter
and the receiver must share a common code, so that the meaning or information contained in
the message may be interpreted without error".
! .
Modes of Communication
We are communicating almost constantly, whether consciously or otherwise. An aircraft
I' maintenance engineer might regularly communicate:
• information;
, '
• ideas;
• feelings;
• attitudes and beliefs
,'
As the sender of a message, he will typically expect some kind of response from the person he
is communicating with (the recipient), which could range from a simple acknowledgement that
I
I his message has been received (and hopefully understood), to a considered and detailed reply.
!
~
The response constitutes feedback.
r '
• As can be seen in the above definition, communication can be:
• verbal/spoken - e.g. a single word, a phrase or sentence, a grunt;
! '
• written/textual - e.g. printed words and/or numbers on paper or on a screen, hand written
notes;
• non-verbal-
o graphic - e.g. pictures, diagrams, hand drawn sketches, indications on a cockpit
,I '
L instrument;
o symbolic - e.g. 'thumbs up', wave of the hand, nod of the head;
, ' o body language - e.g. facial expressions, touch such as a pat on the back, posture.
L
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.7 Communication 7-5
governed by the statement
TIS Integrated Training System
on paQe 2 of this chapter. © Coovriaht 2010
Integrated Training System '1
Designed in association with the I
'. . J
ctub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
one another in 'transactions' (hence the name). TA is a very common model used in therapy
and study of human interactions and there is a great deal written about it.
l ___ '
Parent
There are two forms of Parent we can play.
" I
I
• J
• The Nurturing Parent is caring and concerned and often may appear as a mother-
figure (though men can play it too). They seek to keep the Child safe and offer
unconditional love, calming them when they are troubled.
• The Controlling (or Critical) Parent, on the other hand, tries to make the Child do as
the parent wants them to do, perhaps transferring values or beliefs or helping the
Child to understand and live in society. They may also have negative intent, using
the Child as a whipping-boy or worse.
·,
Adult
The Adult in us is the 'grown up' rational person who talks reasonably and assertively,
neither trying to control nor reacting. The Adult is comfortable with themselves and is, for
many of us, our 'ideal self.
Child l. .I
• The cutely-named Little Professor is the curious and exploring Child who is always
trying out new stuff (often much to their Controlling Parent's annoyance). Together
with the Natural Child they make up the Free Child.
• The Adaptive Child reacts to the world around them, either changing themselves to o. j
fit in or rebelling against the forces they feel.
--,
o
i
,
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro,co.uk question practice aid
, '
Communications (Transactions)
When two people communicate, each exchange is a transaction, Many of our problems come
from transactions which are unsuccessful.
I '
r '
, '
: '
Parents naturally speak to Children, as this is their role as a parent They can talk with other
Parents and Adults, although the subject still may be about the children,
The Nurturing Parent naturally talks to the Natural Child and the Controlling Parent to the
Adaptive Child, In fact these parts of our personality are evoked by the opposite, Thus if I act as
an Adaptive Child, I will most likely evoke the Controlling Parent in the other person,
We also play many games between these positions, and there are rituals from greetings to
whole conversations (such as the weather) where we take different positions for different
r, ' events, These are often 'pre-recorded' as scripts we just play out They give us a sense of
control and identity and reassure us that all is still well in the world, Other games can be
negative and destructive and we play them more out of sense of habit and addiction than
constructive pleasure,
Conflict
r ' Complementary transactions occur when both people are at the same level. Thus Parent talking
I
'-
to Parent, etc, Here, both are often thinking in the same way and communication is easy,
Problems usually occur in Crossed transactions, where the other person is at a different level.
,,
I
:, The parent is either nurturing or controlling, and often speaks to the child, who is either adaptive
~
or 'natural' in their response, When both people talk as a Parent to the other's Child, their wires
r ' get crossed and conflict results,
The ideal line of communication is the mature and rational Adult-Adult relationship,
[ '
r '
--,
,
!
,- )
Ego States
\, _J
, )
--,
i
,_ J
--,
, ,
1
'. J
,I
, '
Preconscious mind
f ' The preconscious includes those things of which we are aware, but where we are not paying
attention. We can choose to pay attention to these and deliberately bring them into the
conscious mind.
(- -,
!
L. We can control our awareness to a certain extent, from focusing in very closely on one
conscious act to a wider awareness that seeks to expand consciousness to include as much of
r -, preconscious information as possible,
Subconscious mind
At the subconscious level, the process and content are out of direct reach of the conscious
mind. The subconscious thus thinks and acts independently,
, '
One of Freud's key findings was that much behavior is driven directly from the subconscious
i
mind. This has the alarming consequence that we are largely unable to control our behavior,
and in particular that which we would sometimes prefer to avoid.
I
L More recent research has shown that the subconscious mind is probably even more in charge
of our actions than even Freud had realized.
, '
I
" ... basicallya battlefield, He is a dark-cellar in which a well-bred spinster lady (the superego)
and a sex-crazed monkey (the id) are forever engaged in mortal combat, the struggle being
L refereed by a rather nervous bank clerk (the ego)."
I ,
I Thus an individual's feelings, thoughts, and behaviors are the result of the interaction of the id,
i
'-' the superego, and the ego.
( '
1 ;
This creates conflict, which creates anxiety, which leads to Defense Mechanisms.
'-'
r'
!
Id L .J
I
The Id contains our primitive drives and operates largely according to the pleasure
principle, whereby its two main goals are the seeking of pleasure and the avoidance of ,
pain. L •. j
It has no real perception of reality and seeks to satisfy its needs through what Freud called ,
the primary processes that dominate the existence of infants, including hunger and self- , ,
protection.
The energy for the Id's actions come from libido, which is the energy storehouse. , )
Ego
Unlike the Id, the Ego is aware of reality and hence operates via the reality principle, ,,
whereby it recognizes what is real and understands that behaviors have consequences.
This includes the effects of social rules that are necessary in order to live and socialize
.,
I
with other people. It uses secondary processes (perception, recognition, judgment and , .J
The dilemma of the Ego is that it has to somehow balance the demands of the Id and ,. --'
The Ego controls higher mental processes such as reasoning and problem-solving, which
, ,
it uses to solve the Id-Super ego dilemma, creatively finding ways to safely satisfy the Id's
basic urges within the constraints of the Super ego.
Superego
The Super ego contains our values and social morals, which often come from the rules of
'_ .J
right and wrong that we learned in childhood from our parents (this is Freud, remember)
and are contained in the conscience.
The Super ego has a model of an ego ideal and which it uses as a prototype against which
to compare the ego (and towards which it encourages the ego to move).
The Super ego is a counterbalance to the Id, and seeks to inhibit the Id's pleasure-seeking
demands, particularly those for sex and aggression.
, ,
,
'" J
,
.,,!
7-10 Module 9.7 Communication
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
Integrated Training System
Designed in association witll the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
c •
L The channel of communication is the medium used to convey the message. For spoken
communication, this might be face-to-face, or via the telephone. Written messages might be
c· notes, memos, documents or e-mails.
t
i
L
Non-verbal Communication
! •
Non-verbal communication can accompany verbal communication, such as a smile during a
i
face-to-face chat. It can also occur independently, for instance a colleague may pass on his
ideas by using a sketch rather than the use of words. It can also be used when verbal
communication is impossible, such as a nod of the head in a noisy environment.
L
r'
r •
r.
'-
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.7 Communication 7-11
govemed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © CopvriQht 2010
, ,
I
,
Communication within Teams r••. _
i
• during a task - to discuss work in progress, ask colleagues questions, confirm actions or
'. j
intentions, or to ensure that others are informed of the maintenance state at any
particular time;
• at the end of a task - to report its completion and highlight any problems. c.J
Spoken communication makes up a large proportion of day-to-day communication within teams
in aircraft maintenance. It relies both on clear transmission of the message (i.e. not mumbled or
obscured by background noise) and the ability of the recipient of the message to hear it (i.e.
active listening followed by accurate interpretation of the message). Good communication within
a team helps to maintain group cohesion. , j
r
i
matters when necessary. The key to such communication is to use words effectively and obtain \. )
feedback to make sure your message has been heard and understood.
· ,
It is much less common for individuals within teams to use written communication. They would , 1
however be expected to obtain pertinent written information communicated by service bulletins
and work cards and to complete documentation associated with a task. i
· j
Communication Between Teams
Communication between teams is critical in aircraft maintenance engineering. It is the means by " r
which one team passes on tasks to another team. This usually occurs at shift handover. The ·, I
Communication between teams will involve passing on written reports of tasks from one shift
supervisor to another. Ideally, this should be backed up by spoken details passed between
supervisors and, where appropriate, individual engineers. This means that, wherever
necessary, outgoing engineers personally brief their incoming colleagues. The written reports
(maintenance cards, procedures, work orders, logs, etc.) and warning flags / placards provide a
record of work completed and work yet to be completed - in other words, they provide
traceability. Furthermore, information communicated at shift handover ensures good
continuity.
Shift Handover
It is universally recognised that at the point of changing shift, the need for effective
i
L.
communication between the out-going and in-coming personnel in aircraft maintenance is
extremely important. The absence of such effective communication has been evident in many
, , accident reports from various industries, not just aircraft maintenance. Well known examples are
,r the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) report 2/95 on the incident to Airbus A320 G-
KMAM at Gatwick in 1993 which highlighted an inadequate handover, and the Cullen Report for
r , the Piper Alpha disaster which concluded that one of the factors which contributed to the
disaster was the failure to transmit key information at shift handover.
,, '
,
Whilst history is littered with past experiences of poor shift handover contributing to accidents
and incidents there is little regulatory or guidance material regarding what constitutes a good
handover process relevant to aircraft maintenance. This section attempts to provide guidelines
on such a process and is drawn from work performed by the UK Health and Safety Executive
(HSE), US Department of Energy (DOE) and
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
Concepts
Effective shift handover depends on three basic elements:
• The outgoing person's ability to understand and communicate the important elements of
the job or task being passed over to the incoming person.
r ' • The incoming person's ability to understand and assimilate the information being
provided by the outgoing person.
• A formalised process for exchanging information between outgoing and incoming people
and a place for such exchanges to take place.
The DOE shift hand over standards stress two characteristics that must be present for effective
,
,, shift handover to take place: ownership and formality. Individuals must assume personal
L ownership and responsibility for the tasks they perform. They must want to ensure that their
tasks are completed correctly, even when those tasks extend across shifts and are completed
by somebody else. The opposite of this mental attitude is "It didn't happen on my shift", which
I"
L. essentially absolves the outgoing person from all responsibility for what happens on the next
shift.
Formality relates to the level of recognition given to the shift handover procedures. Formalism
exists when the shift handover process is defined in the Maintenance Organisation Exposition
(MOE) and managers and supervisors are committed to ensuring that cross-shift information is
effectively delivered. Demonstrable commitment is important as workers quickly perceive a lack
,. of management commitment when they fail to provide ample shift overlap time, adequate job
J aids and dedicated facilities for the handovers to take place.
In such cases the procedures are just seen as the company covering their backsides and
paying lip service as they don't consider the matter important enough to spend effort and money
on.
,,
• For this reason information should be repeated via more than one medium. For example
verbal and one other method such as written or diagrams etc.
• The availability of feedback, to allow testing of comprehension etc. during communication
increases the accuracy. The ability for two-way communication to take place is therefore
important at shift handover.
c ..J
• A part of the shift handover process is to facilitate the formulation of a shared mental
model of the maintenance system, aircraft configuration, tasks in work etc.
Misunderstandings are most likely to occur when people do not have this same mental " ,i
· J
'picture' of the state of things. This is particularly true when deviations from normal
working has occurred such as having the aircraft in the flight mode at a point in a
maintenance check when this is not normally done. Other considerations are when , J
people have returned following a lengthy absence (the state of things could have
changed considerably during this time) and when handovers are carried out between
experienced and inexperienced personnel (experienced people may make assumptions
about their knowledge that may not be true of inexperienced people). In all these cases
handovers can be expected to take longer and should be allowed for.
• Written communication is helped by the design of the documents, such as the handover
log, which consider the information needs of those people who are expected to use it. By
involving the people who conduct shift handovers and asking them what key information
should be included and in what format it should be helps accurate communication and ·
!
~
i
!
· J
l j
,._.J
!I
)
7-14 Module 9.7 Communication
TIS Integrated Training System Use and/or disclosure is
governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
I
L
,'
I
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
~
club66pro.cQ,uk question practice aid
,,
Barriers To Effective Communication At Shift Handover
Research has also shown that certain practices, attitudes and human limitations act as barriers
to effective communication at shift hand over.
• Key information can be lost if the message also contains irrelevant, unwanted
information. We also only have a limited capability to absorb and process what is being
communicated to us. In these circumstances it requires time and effort to interpret what is
'--'
being said and extract the important information. It is important that only key information
is presented, and irrelevant information excluded.
I
L • The language we use in everyday life is inherently ambiguous. Effort therefore needs to
be expended to reduce ambiguity by:
i) carefully specifying the information to be communicated e.g. by specifying
I
I the actual component, tooling or document.
L
ii) facilitating two-way communication which permits clarification of any
ambiguity (e.g. do you mean the inboard or out board wing flap?)
L.. • Misunderstandings are a natural and inevitable feature of human communication and
effort has to be expended to identify, minimise and repair misunderstandings as they
r •
! '
occur. Communication therefore has to be two-way, with both participants taking
responsibility for achieving full and accurate communication.
• People and organisations frequently refer to communication as unproblematic, implying
that successful communication is easy and requires little effort. This leads to over-
confidence and complacency becoming common place. Organisations need to expend
effort to address complacency by:
!' i) emphasising the potential for miscommunication and its possible
L consequences
ii) developing the communication skills of people who are involved in shift
,. hand overs
L
Guidelines
r •
In considering the theories of communication and the research that has been performed the
I' - following guidelines apply for operations that are manned on multiple shifts to allow for
continuous 24 hour maintenance. When shifts are adopted which do not cover a full 24 hour
r •
I,
period, for example early and late shifts with no night shift, the handover where face to face
communication is not possible posses an inherent risk. In such cases organisations should be
aware that the potential for ineffective and inefficient communication is much higher.
r'
I
L. Shift Handover Meetings
It could be said that the primary objective of the shift hand over is to ensure accurate, reliable
communication of task-relevant information across the shifts. However this does not recognise
the users needs for other information which may also be required to enable a complete mental
model to be formed which will allow safe and efficient continuation of the maintenance process.
Examples of such information could be
manning levels, Authorisation coverage, staff sickness, people working extended hours
(overtime), personnel issues etc.
I'
An important aspect related to individual shift handover is when it actually begins. The common
perception is that shift handover occurs only at the transition between the shifts. However, DOE
I,
shift hand over standards make the point that shift handover should really begin as soon as the
'-
••
shift starts. Throughout their shift people should be thinking about, and recording, what "I
information should be included in their handover to the next person or shift. • . .1
The following lists the sort of topics that should be covered in the managers'/supervisors'
handover meeting.
Certifying staff ,
i
J
,
i
, I
The shift handover process should comprise at least two meetings. It starts with a meeting
between the incoming and outgoing shift managers/supervisors. This meeting should be ,
i
'
:
Shift managers/supervisors need to discuss and up-date themselves on tactical and managerial i
matters affecting the continued and timely operation of the maintenance process. The purpose
of this meeting is therefore to acquaint themselves with the general state of the facility and the
·"
! I
overall status of the work for which they are responsible. Outgoing managers/supervisors
should summarise any significant problems they have encountered during their shift, especially
any problems for which solutions have not been developed or are still in progress.
Walkthroughs
After the meeting between shift managers, and assignment of tasks, there is a need for ,..,
Supervisors and certifying staff to meet and exchange detailed information related to individual "!
, ,
jobs and tasks. The most effective way to communicate this information is for the affected
~
i
, I
, ,"
7-16 Module 9.7 Communication Use andfor disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
l
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
incoming and outgoing personnel to go over the task issues while examining the actual jobs on
the hangar floor or at the workplace. A mutual inspection and discussion of this nature is called
a "Walkthrough".
The following lists the sort of topics that should be covered in the supervisors/certifying staffs
walkthrough meeting.
• Jobs/tasks in progress
• Workcards being used
• Last step(s) completed
• Problems encountered
• Outstanding/in work/status
• Solved
• Unusual occurrences
, '
• Unusual defects
[
~ • Resources required/available
• Location of removed parts, tooling etc.
• Parts and tools ordered and when expected
• Parts shortages
• Proposed next steps
I'--' • Communication with Planners, Tech Services, workshops
• Communication with managers etc.
,
I
' • task handover should be read in conjunction with the section on Non-Routine Tasks
I
• and Process Sheets.
'--
Task Handover
I
,
'--'
The handing over of tasks from one person to another does not always occur at the point of
changing shifts. Tasks are frequently required to be handed over during a shift. This Section
deals with two common situations. When a task is being handed over to someone who is
i
L present at the time, and when a job is being stopped part
, . Handing Over A Task Directly To Another Person
When the task is being directly handed over to someone who is present at the time the process
and concepts are the same as for a Walkthrough described in the Shift Handover Section of this
handbook. That is to say it is done face to face using verbal and written communication. In
these cases the written element is normally by ensuring that the task cards or non routine
process sheets are accurately completed clearly identifying at what stage in the task the job has
r, ' reached. Any deviations from normal working practices or procedures must be clearly
~ highlighted during the Walkthrough. An example of this would be if in changing a valve, a clamp,
not required to be removed by the maintenance manual, is disturbed to aid removal and
,,
,
I
installation. Many mishaps have occurred in these circumstances as the person taking over the
I
~ job assumes that the task was being performed as per the maintenance manual, drawings,
procedures etc. It is a CAA requirement that this deviation is recorded by the outgoing person,
I and it is essential from a communication effectiveness point of view that this is reinforced during
L the Walkthrough.
,.
i
L
r .,
of task accomplishment and what is required to complete the job. Face to face communication
is not possible therefore total reliance has to be placed on written communication, a single
medium with no redundancy and opportunity to question and test a true understanding by the
person expected to finish the job.
Scheduled Tasks
The paperwork normally associated with scheduled tasks are the Task Cards that are issued at
the beginning of the maintenance input. These may have been written by the manufacturer,
maintenance organisation or the operator of the aircraft. In all cases the card and associated
task breakdown written on it, assume that the same person will start and finish the job. It was
not designed to be used as a hand over document.
That is not to say that it could not be the hand over, or that it could not form part of one. It really ~
,
depends on the circumstances. 1
Task Cards break down jobs in to discrete stages, and ideally jobs should always be stopped at
one of these stages so that the last sign off on the card is the exact stage of the job reached. In ,
'.- .'
this case the card is the handover. However, a job is sometimes stopped at a point which is
between the stages identified on the card, the stage sequencing has not been followed, or a
deviation from normal working has occurred (such as in the example of disturbing the additional
clamp to aid removal and installation of a valve). When this occurs additional written information
must be used to clearly identify the point of exit from the task and what is required to complete
the job and restore serviceability. Non-routine cards or sheets should then be used to record
and transmit the relevant information necessary. Figure 7.3 is an example of a Task Card.
,
, ,,
....,
I
, ,,
i
, J
~
l J
GO FAST AIRWAYS
IVC type: B737 MP ref: MSIB737/668
C '
Aircraft Reg: G-OFST
,
'-' Flight Controls
,, Additional work card raised: Vestry,
'I
'-'
27-00-56 Flap synchronising system Mechanic Inspector
r '
a) Check the cable tensions are correct (mm 27-50-02) IlJ IlJfoggs 0
stamp
b) With the flaps selected up, disconnect the operating IlJ IlJfoggs 0
,, lin k from one transmitter gearbox only.
'-'
stamp
r •
c) Pressurise the hydraulic system and select flaps down IlJ IlJfoggs 0
stamp
d) Make sure that the flaps stert to move and then the IlJ IlJfoggs 0
system cuts out. stamp
( ,
Figure 7.3: Typical Task Card
,
'- In the case above, the job has been accomplished fully up to stage d), but the hydraulics have
been depressurised therefore only part of stage e) has been accomplished. A supplementary
r '
card, worksheet or non routine sheet (the terminology will vary from one company to another)
must be raised to communicate that the Task Card does not reflect the true state of the aircraft.
In this case the wording could be:
,, ,
,
w
Defect Action Taken ~1echanic Ius!'ec-
, . tor
I
lRiference cara27-00-56.
Cara compfeteafo[[y up to
!'-' stage d). Jfyaraufic system
aepressurisea 6ut tfie
,, , transmi&ttrr operating uni( is
,, not reconnected: Operating
'-'
Eini>" to De fecc!'nnecteJ prior to
peiforming stage j).
r ,
c-,
The combination of both documents provides sufficient information for the person picking up the
!
job to know what stage the work is up to and what is required to complete it. • .>
Non-scheduled Tasks
Complex or lengthy non-scheduled tasks should always be broken down in to a number of c,
discrete steps using stage or process sheets (the terminology will vary from one company to
another). Many incidents have occurred when people have started a straight forward job but
had to exit the task part way through without anybody to handover to. These situations by their
nature are unplanned and are normally associated with time pressure or emergency situations.
In spite of this it is vital that time is taken by the person leaving the job to comprehensively
record what activities have taken place and what is required to complete the job. This would be .. ,
recorded on stage sheets and should emphasis any deviations from the normal or expected
way of working. Management and supervisors have a responsibility to ensure that adequate
time is given to maintenance staff to record their work if they require tasks to be suspended for .,
any reason.
l j
Maintenance Programmes today are frequently based on the principles of Condition Monitoring.
Most components on the aircraft therefore have no specific period defined as to when they will
be removed for repair, overhaul etc. The time to remove them is determined by a reliability
programme or scheduled inspections which assess their serviceability. Operator's Task Cards
are normally derived, or copied from those provided by the aircraft manufacturer. Unfortunately
these are usually only the required tasks and do not include those tasks which have to be ,_.,
performed as a consequence. An example of this is an engine change. The manufacturer will
have written cards describing the break down of various inspections such as borescope, oil
sampling and magnetic chip detectors but not a card on changing the engine. This had led to l .i
the situation whereby many jobs, often long and complex, have no pre-printed task cards or
process sheets which break down the job in to stages and so help the engineers. .....,
I
. i
Shift and task handover systems: A review across industries
• conducted face-to-face
• two-way, with both participants taking responsibility for accurate communication l j
i
'~- -'
7-20 Module 9.7 Communication
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
c ' Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro,co.uk question practice aid
Communication Problems
There are two main ways in which communication can cause problems, These are lack of
i' communication and poor communication. The former is characterised by the engineer who
L forgets to pass on pertinent information to a colleague, or when a written message is mislaid.
The latter is typified by the engineer who does not make it clear what he needs to know and
consequently receives inappropriate information, or a written report in barely legible
handwriting, Both problems can lead to subsequent human error.
,
Communication also goes wrong when one of the parties involved makes some kind of
~
assumption, The sender of a message may assume that the receiver understands the terms he
has used. The receiver of a message may assume that the message means one thing when in
, fact he has misinterpreted it. Assumptions may be based on context and expectations, which
'-
have already been mentioned in this chapter. Problems with assumptions can be minimised if
messages are unambiguous and proper feedback is given,
Basic rules of thumb to help aircraft maintenance engineers minimise poor communication are:
c ,
,r •
i
~
,, .
: .
Usa and/or disclosure is Module 9,7 Communication 7-21
TIS Integrated Training System
governed by the statement
on page 2 of this chapter. © Copyright 2010
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the l J
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
l, J
,
"
Intentionally Blank
. ,
" )
, .J
~ )
, ,
'-'
inadequate logging or recording of work has been cited as a contributor to several incidents,
,r ' In the B737 double engine oil loss incident in February 1995, for instance, one of the MIB
conclusions was:
r '
i " ... the Line Engineer",had not made a written statement or annotation on a work stage sheet to
L show where he had got to in the inspections".
i ' The reason for this was because he had intended completing the job himself and, therefore, did
not consider that detailed work logging was necessary, However, this contributed towards the
incident in that:
"the Night Base Maintenance Controller accepted the tasks on a verbal handover [and] he did
not fully appreciate what had been done and what remained to be done",
, '
i
Even if engineers think that they are going to complete a job, it is always necessary to keep the
record of work up-to-date just in case the job has to be handed over. This may not necessarily
be as a result of a shift change, but might be due to a rest break, illness, the need to move to
another (possibly more urgent) task, etc.
,.
The exact manner in which work should be logged tends to be prescribed by company
procedures. It is usually recorded in written form, However, there is no logical reason why
symbols and pictures should not also be used to record work or problems, especially when used
for handovers. There are many cases where it may be clearer to draw a diagram rather than to
try to explain something in words (i.e. 'a picture is worth a thousand words'),
,,
C '
The key aspects of work logging and recording are captured in the CM's CMIPs Leaflet 15-2
L..,
(previously published as Airworthiness Notice No.3). This states:
, '
! "In relation to work carried out on an aircraft, it is the duty of all persons to whom this Notice
applies to ensure that an adequate record of the work carried out is maintained, This is
r '! particularly important where such work carries on beyond a working period or shift, or is handed
,i over from one person to another. The work accomplished, particularly if only disassembly or
'-'
disturbance of components or aircraft systems, should be recorded as the work progresses or
prior to undertaking a disassociated task, In any event, records should be completed no later
than the end of the work period or shift of the individual undertaking the work. Such records
should include 'open' entries to reflect the remaining actions necessary to restore the aircraft to
, ' a serviceable condition prior to release, In the case of complex tasks which are undertaken
frequently, consideration should be given to the use of pre-planned stage sheets to assist in the
control, management and recording of these tasks, Where such sheets are used, care must be
i . taken to ensure that they accurately reflect the current requirements and recommendations of
! the manufacturer and that all key stages, inspections, or replacements are recorded."
New technology is likely to help engineers to record work more easily and effectively in the
! future, ICAO Digest No, 12: "Human Factors in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection", refers to
L
hand-held computers and an Integrated Maintenance Information System (IMIS), It points out
that these devices are likely to encourage the prompt and accurate recording of maintenance
tasks. , J
information to engineers in an accessible and useable format. A contributory factor in the 8737 --,
double engine oil loss incident was that the information which should have prompted the ,
I
engineer to carry out a post-inspection idle engine run to check for leaks was in the . )
:-i,
I
•. J
\.. )
, , ,
--,
!
, ,
. ,,
, )
~
,
f
'- J
,. _I.
Responsibility for maintaining currency lies with both the individual engineer and the
maintenance organisation for which he works. The engineer should make it his business to
keep up-to-date with changes in his profession (remembering that making assumptions can be
dangerous). The organisation should provide the appropriate training and allow their staff time
,. to undertake the training before working on a new aircraft type or variant. It should also make
written information easily accessible to engineers and encourage them to read it. It is, of course,
vital that those producing the information make it easy for engineers to understand (i.e. avoid
ambiguity).
Anecdotal evidence describes a case where a certain maintenance procedure was "proscribed"
, . (i.e. prohibited) in a service bulletin. The technician reading this concluded that the procedure
was "prescribed" (i.e. defined, laid down) and proceeded to perform the forbidden action.
f •
From a human factors point of view, small changes to the technology or procedures concerning
L existing aircraft carry potentially the greatest risk. These do not usually warrant formal training
and may merely be minor changes to the maintenance manual. Although there should be
mechanisms in place to record all such changes, this presumes that the engineer will consult
the updates. It is part of the engineer's individual responsibility to maintain his currency.
,.
I
L
( .
,
L-
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.7 Communication 7-25
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © Copvrioht 2010
Integrated Training System "
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
, !
. )
I ;
:. )
~
,
L__ j
Intentionally Blank
~- )
.
l.J
,
I
, J
, , ,
~ j
i i
, "
c '
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
ciub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Dissemination of Information
r ' As highlighted in the previous section, both the individual engineer and the organisation in
i which he works have a shared responsibility to keep abreast of new information. Good
L
dissemination of information within an organisation forms part of its safety culture (Chapter 3).
,. Typically, the maintenance organisation will be the sender and the individual engineer will be
the recipient.
~,
There should normally be someone within the maintenance organisation with the responsibility
for disseminating information. Supervisors can play an important role by ensuring that the
,' engineers within their team have seen and understood any communicated information.
Poor dissemination of information was judged to have been a contributory factor to the Eastern
Airlines accident in 1983. The NTSB accident report stated:
"On May 17, 1983, Eastern Air Lines issued a revised work card 7204 [master chip detector
installation procedures, including the fitment of a-ring seals] .... the material was posted and all
mechanics were expected to comply with the guidance. However, there was no supervisory
r' follow-up to insure that mechanics and foremen were incorporating the training material into the
work requirements ... Use of binders and bulletin boards is not an effective means of controlling
the dissemination of important work procedures, especially when there is no accountability
system in place to enable supervisors to ensure that all mechanics had seen the applicable
training and procedural information."
Communication is an active process whereby both the organisation and engineer have to play
their part.
r '
L
[ .
c. )
i
l J
n
l. j
:
c_ j
: I
c . .J
Intentionally Blank
c ,i
,
, j
:.i
i
,- }
7-28 Module 9,7 Communication Use andfor disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System
© Copyright 2010
governed by the statement
on page 2 of this chapter.
~
,
:
L
I '
I "
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
L. c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
1 '
roo'
, ,
I '
i
~
TTS Integ rated
Training System
, ,
Module 9
1 '
I,
"""'
,
L.
Human Factors
i'
L..
, ' 9.8 Human Error
L.
r'1
, ,
L..
! '
i '
~
, '
L
(, 1,
, '
I'
I
'-'
I'
!
\
'-'
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9,8 Human Error 8-1
TTS Integrated Training System
, ' governed by the statement
on page 2 of this chapter. tel r:nnvrinht ?01 n
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the , j
club66pro .co.uk question practice aid
,
!
Copyright Notice :. )
© Copyright. All worldwide rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, ,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any other means whatsoever: i.e. ,;
photocopy, electronic, mechanical recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of
Total Training Support Ltd.
LEVEL 1
• A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
L .,'
LEVEL 2
• A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• An ability to apply that knowledge. , j
Objectives:
• The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
. ,
:. j
LEVEL 3
• A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
i
• A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive , J
manner.
Objectives:
• The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
• The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
• The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
• The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics , ,:
describing the subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions. , ;
• The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
r ,
r
L
..
r'
,
I
L
·!
i
, i
i
, J
· !
'. J
....,
!
,
!
, J
8-4 Module 9.8 Human Error Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
,
Integrated Training System
, Designed in association with the
'-'
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
,- 1
In his book "Human Error", Professor James Reason defines error as follows:
"Error will be taken as a generic term to encompass all those occasions in which a planned
i
L... sequence of mental or physical activities fails to achieve its intended outcome, and when these
failures cannot be attributed to the intervention of some chance agency".
It is clear that aircraft maintenance engineering depends on the competence of engineers. Many
of the examples presented in Chapter 1 "Incidents Attributable to Human Factors I Human
Error" and throughout the rest of this document highlight errors that aircraft maintenance
engineers have made which have contributed to aircraft incidents or accidents.
In the past, aircraft components and systems were relatively unreliable. Modem aircraft by
comparison are designed and manufactured to be highly reliable. As a consequence, it is more
common nowadays to hear that an aviation incident or accident has been caused by "human
error".
,. The following quotation illustrates how aircraft maintenance engineers playa key role in keeping
,
, modern aircraft reliable:
L.,
"Because civil aircraft are designed to fly safely for unlimited time provided defects are detected
and repaired, safety becomes a matter of detection and repair rather than one of aircraft
structure failure. In an ideal system, all defects which could affect flight safety will have been
predicted in advance, located positively before they become dangerous, and eliminated by
effective repair. In one sense, then, we have changed the safety system from one of physical
defects in aircraft to one of errors in complex human-centred systems"
,. ,
! The rest of this chapter examines some of the various ways in which human error has been
conceptualised. It then considers the likely types of error that occur during aircraft maintenance
and the implications if these errors are not spotted and corrected. Finally, means of managing
human error in aircraft maintenance are discussed.
, ,
-,
;
However, errors may have been made before an aircraft ever leaves the ground by aircraft
designers. This may mean that, even if an aircraft is maintained and flown as it is designed to n
be, a flaw in its original design may lead to operational safety being compromised. Alternatively, i
flawed procedures put in place by airline, maintenance organisation or air traffic control • J
It is common to find when investigating an incident or accident that more than one error has
been made and often by more than one person. It may be that, only when a certain combination
of errors arises and error 'defences' breached (see the 'Swiss Cheese Model') will safety be
compromised.
In his book "Human Error", Professor Reason discusses two types of human error:
· J
Variable and constant. It can be seen in Figure 8.1 that variable errors in (A) are random in
nature, whereas the constant errors in (8) follow some kind of consistent, systematic (yet .,
erroneous) pattern. The implication is that constant errors may be predicted and therefore I
, J
controlled, whereas variable errors cannot be predicted and are much harder to deal with. If we
know enough about the nature of the task, the environment it is performed in, the mechanisms
governing performance, and the nature of the individual, we have a greater chance of predicting
an error.
,--,
r
I
L
'-
A B
L
Target patterns of 5 shots fired by two riflemen. Rifleman A's pattern exhibits no constant
r 1 error, but large variable errors; rifleman 8's pattern exhibit's a large constant error but
small variable errors. The latter WOUld, potentially, be easier to predict and to correct (e.g.
by correctly aligning the rifle sight). Chapanis, 1951
r, •
I
'--'
However, it is rare to have enough information to permit accurate predictions; we can generally
only predict along the lines of "re-assembly tasks are more likely to incur errors than dismantling
: ' tasks", or "an engineer is more likely to make an error at 3 a.m., after having worked 12 hours,
than at 10 a.m. after having worked only 2 hours". It is possible to refine these predictions with
more information, but there will always be random errors or elements which cannot be
predicted.
A well designed system or procedure should mean that errors made by aircraft maintenance
engineers are reversible. Thus, if an engineer installs a part incorrectly, it should be spotted and
corrected before the aircraft is released back to service by supervisory procedures in place.
Reason then suggests an error classification based upon the answers to these questions as
shown in Figure 8.2. , ,J
No Involuntary or non-
Was there a prior
intention to act?
No
Was there intention
in the action?
t-'
~,
.... :" intentional action
~------------~
'-.
Spontaneous or ~ I
I
Yes 46
subsidiary action
+-Yes
Did the actions c. j
+-Yes
• Unintentional action
- slip or lapse
i :
: .i
Yes
uccessful Action
,
Figure 8.2 Error types based on intention. Source: Reason, 1990 ,
,
,
l j
,-,
,i
, '
! 1
" )
8-8 Module 9.8 Human Error
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro,co.uk question practice aid
f 1
The most well-known of these are slips, lapses and mistakes.
Slips can be thought of as actions not carried out as intended or planned, e.g. 'transposing
digits when copying out numbers, or misordering steps in a procedure.
L..
Lapses are missed actions and omissions, i.e. when somebody has failed to do something due
to lapses of memory and/or attention or because they have forgotten something, e.g. forgetting
:~
to replace an engine cowling.
Mistakes are a specific type of error brought about by a faulty plan/intention, i.e. somebody did
something believing it to be correct when it was, in fact, wrong, e.g. an error of judgment such
r • as mis-selection of bolts when fitting an aircraft windscreen.
Slips typically occur at the task execution stage, lapses at the storage (memory) stage and
mistakes at the planning stage.
Violations sometimes appear to be human errors, but they differ from slips, lapses and mistakes
,
( '1 because they are deliberate 'illegal' actions, i.e. somebody did something knowing it to be
against the rules (e.g. deliberately failing to follow proper procedures). Aircraft maintenance
engineers may consider that a violation is well intentioned, i.e. 'cutting corners' to get a job done
on time. However, procedures must be followed appropriately to help safeguard safety.
,.
,.
,.
·. :
·. ·
·
( :
r •
iL..
: .
i,
L
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.8 Human Error 8-9
governed by the statement
TIS Integrated Training System
on paqe 2 of this chapter. (Cl r.nnvrinht ?n1n
Integrated Training System
Designed in assocfation with the
club66pro,co.uk question practice aid
The behaviour of aircraft maintenance engineers can be broken down into three distinct
categories: skill-based, rule-based and knowledge-based behaviour.
'. )
Skill-based behaviours are those that rely on stored routines or motor programmes that have ""1
been learned with practice and may be executed without conscious thought.
·,
, •
.'
Rule-based behaviours are those for which a routine or procedure has been learned. The
components of a rule-based behaviour may comprise a set of discrete skills.
Knowledge-based behaviours are those for which no procedure has been established. These
require the [aircraft maintenance engineer] to evaluate information, and then use his knowledge
and experience to formulate a plan for dealing with the situation.
Each of these behaviour types have specific errors associated with them. · ..
·
Examples of skill-based errors are action slips, environmental capture and reversion.
Action slips as the name implies are the same as slips, i.e. an action not carried out as
· . ,
intended. The example given in Figure 8.3 may consist of an engineer realising he needs a
certain wrench to complete a job but, because he is distracted by a colleague, picks up another
set to the wrong torque and fails to notice that he has tightened the bolts incorrectly.
• J
Correct
decision ""'r>1/' engineer is h"'-i;~·.
dis! rae! ed, . ''''-'::':'JllJ;~''~7'
, .J
Environmental capture may occur when an engineer carries out a certain task very frequently in
a certain location. Thus, an engineer used to carrying out a certain maintenance adjustment on
an Airbus A300, may inadvertently carry out this adjustment on the next A300 he works on,
even if it is not required (and he has not made a conscious decision to operate the skill). :. .\
Reversion can occur once a certain pattern of behaviour has been established, primarily ::
I
because it can be very difficult to abandon or unlearn it when it is no longer appropriate. Thus, ~ .J
an engineer may accidentally carry out a procedure that he has used for years, even though it
has been recently revised. This is more likely to happen when people are not concentrating or
: )
when they are in a stressful situation.
Rule-based behaviour is generally fairly robust and this is why the use of procedures and rules
,_ J
is emphasised in aircraft maintenance. However, errors here are related to the use of the wrong
rule or procedure. For example, an engineer may misdiagnose a fault and thus apply the wrong ~
procedure, thus not clearing the fault. Errors here are also sometimes due to faulty recall of I,
, j
procedures. For instance, not remembering the correct sequence when performing a procedure.
'" )
8-10 Module 9.8 Human Error Use and/or disclosure is
TTS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
. !
I ' Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
:
("
Skill·based ,/
slips & lapses ...,
,.
Rule·based
Errors mistakes
I .
,'
Knowledge.based
mistakes x
Figure 8.4: The three categories of error
Figure 8.4 shows the three categories of error linked to three human performance levels: the
r 1
skill-based (SB), rule based (RB) and knowledge-based (KB) levels.
The SB level involves the largely automatic control of habitual task in routine surroundings.
r '
i The RB level switches in when we encounter some trained-for or familiar problem.
G
The KB level only occurs when we are faced with an entirely novel situation.
,.
Errors can thus be sub-divided into three distinct categories:
j
Skill-based errors (34%) Unclassifiable (10%) l ..
l J
Figure 8.5 shows an analysis of the performance levels involved in the Hobbs critical incident , ;
study. It shows that Knowledge Based errors occur very rarely in aircraft maintenance activities.
Hence, we will not discuss them any further. We will focus only on the Skill Based slips and
lapses and the Rule Based mistakes.
• Recognition failures
• Memory failures ", !
~ j
• Attentional failures
This sets out the major sub-divisions of slips and lapses. Each one is linked to a different mental
function: perception (i.e., taking in and interpreting relevant sensory inputs), remembering to I ;
carry out the actions (i.e., prospective memory), deploying the limited attentional resource over
the various actions in an appropriate manner (as we shall see, various misdirections of attention
are a major factor in the production of slips and lapses), and selecting the pre-programmed , )
. actions that are to be carried out (in skilled action, this selection process is largely automatic
and outside of consciousness).
, )
Recognition failures
Recognition failures break down into two main groups: misidentifications and non-detections
(false-negatives) .
I
~_ J
A third class is wrongly detecting defects that were not actually present (false-positives). These
are logically possible and do actually occur, but they are unlikely to carry a major safety penalty.
Maintenance systems are designed to be fairly tolerant of false-positives (better to be safe than
r '
I sorry), but they are highly intolerant offalse-negatives.
Causes of misidentifications
• Similarity (in appearance, location, function, etc.) between right and wrong objects.
( , • Indistinctness: poor illumination and signal-to-noise ratios.
i
'-.;
• Expectation: we tend to see what we want to see (confirmation bias).
• Habit: in well-practised and familiar tasks, perceptions become less precise.
,
i
'
Misidentifications involve putting the wrong mental interpretation upon the evidence gathered by
our senses. These errors have been the cause of many serious accidents. They include train
( , drivers who misread a signal aspect and pilots who misinterpret the height information provided
by their instruments,
r . A major factor in misidentifications is the similarity (in appearance, location, function, etc.)
i
between the right and wrong objects.
( , This can be made worse by poor signal-to-noise ratios (Le., poor illumination, static,
i inaccessibility and the like).
( , Misidentifications are also strongly influenced by expectation: we tend to see what we expect to
see. What we perceive is derived from two types of information: the evidence of our senses and
knowledge structures stored in long-term memory. The weaker or more ambiguous the sensory
r ' evidence, the more likely it is that our perceptions will be dominated by expectation, or the
,,
l- stored knowledge structures. This is termed 'confirmation bias' or 'mindset' Once we have
formed an impression or hunch about what is going on, we tend to select information that will
,, .
confirm this hunch, even when there is contradictory evidence available.
I
Strong habits are also like expectations: we sometimes accept a crude match to what is
i' expected, even when it is wrong.
, '
( 1
,, ,
f .
Interactions with
local eve nts
window of
accident opportunity
c...=~
Active failures
Latent failures
""'1
!
Figure 8.6: Reason's Swiss Cheese Model • J
Some failures are latent, meaning that they have been made at some point in the past and lay
dormant. This may be introduced at the time an aircraft was designed or may be associated
with a management decision. Errors made by front line personnel, such as aircraft maintenance -,
engineers, are 'active' failures. The more holes in a system's defences, the more likely it is that
errors result in incidents or accidents, but it is only in certain circumstances, when all holes 'line
up', that these occur. Usually, if an error has breached the engineering defences, it reaches the
flight operations defences (e.g. in flight warning) and is detected and handled at this stage.
l j
However, occasionally in aviation, an error can breach all the defences (e.g. a pilot ignores an
in flight warning, believing it to be a false alarm) and a catastrophic situation ensues.
, }
(' 1
Failures
Memory failures
, '
: ,
~
• Memory can fail at one or more of three information-processing stages:-
{ . o input: Insufficient attention is given to the to-be-remembered material. Lost from
! short-term memory.
o storage: Material decays or suffers interference in long-term memory.
o retrieval: Known material not recalled at the appropriate time.
Here we move on to the second major heading in the overall 'wrong actions' category: memory
failures.
The second kind of input failure is the forgetting of previous actions, Again, this is due to a
failure of attention, When we are doing very familiar and routine tasks, our minds are almost
( .
! i always on something other than the job in hand, That's a necessary feature for the task to be
L. done smoothly, The result is that we "forget' where we put our tools down, or find ourselves
walking around looking for something that we are still carrying,
,
L.
Some other consequences of this kind of forgetting are:
a) Losing our place in a series of actions: we 'wake up' and don't know immediately where
we are in the sequence,
r ., b) The time-gap experience: we can't remember things about where we've been walking or
driving in the last few minutes, or what we've been doing exactly. For example, we can
be in the shower and can't remember whether or not we've put shampoo on our hair. The
( 1
evidence (if there was any) has been washed away, and we have been thinking about
something else. In short, we've not been attending to the routine details.
,....,
Storage failures ,
'_ ,J
• Forgetting the plan-a vague feeling that you should be doing something, but can't
recall what.
, )
• 'What-am-I-doing-here?' experience-find yourself in front of open drawer or
cupboard, but can't recall what you came to get. --,
• Forgetting items in a plan-necessary steps omitted. I
~- )
An intention to do something is rarely put into action immediately. Usually, it has to be held in
memory until the right time and place for its execution. Memory for intentions is called
prospective memory, and it is particularly prone to forgetting or sidetracking, so that the action is
not carried out as intended.
It is, of course, possible to forget an intention completely, so that no trace of it remains. More
usually, the forgetting occurs in degrees. ~,
,
" j
Almost forgetting the plan entirely turns into the vague 'I should be doing something' feeling.
Here, you have a vague and uneasy sense that you should be doing something, but you can't
remember what, or where and when it should be done. ',- ,
Another fairly common experience is that you remember the intention and start out to carry it
through, but somewhere along the line (usually because you are preoccupied with something
else) you forget what it is that you came to some place to do. The place could be a shop or you
could find yourself standing in front of an open drawer or cupboard, You simply can't recall what
it is you came to fetch. This is the 'what-am-I-doing?' or 'what-am-I-doing here?' feeling.
The third possibility is that you set out to perform a plan of action, think you have completed it,
but later discover that you've left something out. A common experience is to return home to find
a letter you intended to post.
Retrieval failures
• Fail to recall something you know you know. Often a name, a word or a fact.
• Frequently, the memory search is blocked by some other word or name that you know to , j
Retrieval failures are among the commonest ways that your memory can let you down, and
increasingly so as you grow older. '. ;
At its most acute, it shows itself as the 'tip-of-the-tongue' (TOT) state when you realise that you
can't call to mind a name or a word that you know you know. The searched-for word seems
, )
tantalizingly close - on the tip of your tongue, in fact. The problem is usually made worse
because some word or name comes into your mind, but you know it's not the one you are trying
to find. However, you have a strong sense that somehow it's close to the target item, you may
,,
(
feel it sounds similar, or has the same number of syllables, or is a name that belongs to
L... someone who is related to or works with the person whose name you are trying to find,
, '
Research on TOT states has shown that these painful searches get resolved in one of three
ways:
i 1
a) The lost word or name appears as the result of a deliberate search, though this could be
one of many attempts,
b) The searched-for name or word just pops into your mind out of the blue, usually when
,
, you are doing some routine job like washing up,
'-' c) A TV programme or newspaper or some other external source mentions the word or
i ' name and you recognise it as the one you have been hunting fOL Each of these three
methods of concluding a memory search is equally likely.
It is unlikely that TOT states are much involved in maintenance errors. They are mentioned here
for two reasons:
a) They are a common everyday experience,
! ' b) They complete the trio of memory stages mentioned earlieL
Attentional failures
'--
• Attention is closely bound up with conscious awareness.
• It can vary in both direction and intensity
• It selects some part of a much larger array of information for further processing.
( ,
• It has limited capacity,
( • It is necessary for effective information-processing.
L...
A typical pattern
Intended path ,. -~
l )
Imagine that you are carrying out a highly practised action routine, like boiling an electric kettle
preparatory to making a beverage. Imagine also that you have a guest who has asked for tea,
while you are a habitual coffee-drinker.
You go to the kitchen, fill the kettle and set it to boil. I n the meantime, you start thinking about
something else. As a result you miss the choice point and fill both cups with instant coffee and
pour on the water. .
<.. J
In this case, the kettle sequence is the fat arrow on the left. The fatter of the two arrows on the
right is the coffee-making routine. The thinner arrow is the tea-making routine. You miss the
choice point and your actions run, as on rails, along the familiar route. But this time, because of ..i
a change in circumstances, it is an absent-minded slip.
• Make tea instead of coffee. You are a tea drinker, but guest asks for coffee.
• Drive to work on Saturday morning when you meant to go to elsewhere.
• Intend to stop off to buy groceries on the way home, but drive straight past.
Branching slips, as the name indicates, involve actions where two different outcomes have an
initial common pathway. Boiling a kettle of water, for example, is the first stage in achieving a
variety of goals: making tea, making coffee, speeding up the cooking of vegetables, etc.
The defining feature of these slips is that the wrong route (Le., the one not currently intended) is
taken. This 'wrong route' is almost invariably more familiar and frequently traveled than the one
that was currently intended.
The slip is triggered by a change in plan (see tea-making slip described earlier)
o Intend to collect manual, but on removing it from shelf other books fall down. You
replace books but depart without the manual.
• Actions associated with the interruption can get unconsciously 'counted in' as part of the
intended sequence.
i '
,
This is another type of slip that is a relatively common occurrence in aircraft engineering. They
are also a frequent error type in everyday life.
(" "1
I
'-'
On some occasions, the interruption causes the person to 'forget' the subsequent actions, or
allows him or her to get sidetracked into something else. On others, the actions involved in
dealing with an interruption get unconsciously counted in as part of the original action
I sequence. For example, a person is making tea and finds that the tea caddy is empty. They go
'-
to the cupboard and put fresh tea into the caddy. Then they pour boiling water into an empty
,! ' teapot having omitted to put the tea in.
G
Premature exits
(" ;
,
• Terminate job before all fastenings are attached, or oil/fluid replaced, or caps secured, or
all tools and foreign objects removed, Actual examples:-
"
'- o Nuts left finger tight and not torqued,
o Centre P2 instrument panel slid out on takeoff.
( : o Pre-flight checks revealed that control column could not be moved backwards. 3
cm hole cutter found wedged between balance weight and a/c structure,
Another name for undershoots is 'premature exits', That is, departing from an action sequence
before all the component actions are carried out. Slips of this kind feature very commonly
among aircraft engineering quality lapses.
i '
i' -
General factors promoting wrong actions
Several studies of everyday absent-minded actions, in which people kept diaries of the
occasions when their actions did not go as planned, have shown that there are a number of ~ )
a) Paradoxically, absent-minded ness is the penalty we pay for being skilled; that is, for . .\
'
being able to control our routine actions in a largely automatic fashion. It is therefore
natural that slips and lapses are most likely to occur during the execution of well-
practised habitual tasks in familiar surroundings. Of course, we do commit errors when
we are learning a new skill (like using a computer keyboard), but these errors are most
likely to be fumbles and mishits due to inexperience and lack of motor coordination.
, .J
c) Many action slips involve carrying out a set of actions that is highly usual or habitual in
that situation, but was not what was wanted or intended at the time. The trigger for the
slip was some kind of change, either in the plan or in the surroundings. If that change
had not occurred then the actions would have run along their accustomed tracks as
intended. Thus, change of any kind is a powerful error-producer.
" j
Slips versus mistakes
"
• Installation problems (omissions) are the largest class of maintenance errors. ,. j
;
• While many of them are due to slips, this is not the whole story.
• Omissions can also occur because of mistakes: having the wrong idea about something,
or using the wrong procedure.
• Slips are hardly ever repeated, but mistakes are.
· ,i
•
'. J
· }
:. J
· ,
.
8-20 Module 9.8 Human Error
Use and/or disclosure is
ITS Integrated Training System govemed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
I
'. )
r ' Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
( "
• We can misapply a normally good rule: that is, we can use it in a situation for which it is
not appropriate because of some changed circumstance.
• We can apply a bad rule that may get the job done but can have unwanted
consequences.
• Logically, there is also a third class: we can fail to apply a good rule that was appropriate
and should have been followed. These are violations, rule-bendings and non-
compliances.
The next few examples look at examples of misapplying good rules and applying bad rules.
This explains what is meant by a 'good rule'. It also spells out some of the situations in which a
good rule can be wrongly applied.
The business of applying problem-solving rules is often complicated by the fact that different
problems can share common features. In other words, it is possible that a given problem
.I ' presents both indications suggesting that the common rule (common because it's a useful rule)
should be applied as well as counter-indications directing the person to apply a less commonly-
[ . used rule.
Here is an example. A family doctor is holding surgery during winter time in, say, the UK. A
mother comes in with a baby that has a runny nose and a high fever. The doctor sees a lot of
patients with influenza in Northern European winters and prescribes penicillin. But the baby
actually has meningitis that does not respond that dosage of penicillin. The counter-indications
r ' are a bad headache and a stiff neck, but these are difficult to establish in a young child who
doesn't talk and doesn't have much of a neck. The consequence of this RB mistake is that the
child either dies or suffers severe brain damage.
r '
L
'-'
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.8 Human Error 8-21
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. lc) r.nnvrinht ?01 0
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
• Engineer involved in 1-11 accident ignored storeman's comment that the required bolt ~
was an 80-a slightly longer bolt than the 70 that he was searching for. ·, ,
This example is drawn from the 747 dropped engine incident, and explains why the inspector
failed to spot the missing retainers. Since only 7 of the airline's fleet of forty one 747s were fitted ,.....,
with these secondary retainers, he did not expect them to be present. . "'
· .!
· J
,
~, ..
'. ;
-.
'c. J
I
.- ;,
8-22 Module 9.8 Human Error Use andfor disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
r ' • Most people pick up some 'bad rules' (bad habits) when learning a job.
• They are 'bad' because they can lead to something going wrong at a later time, even
though they might serve their immediate purpose on many occasions.
• Such 'bad rules' become established as part of the person's 'toolbag'.
Bad rules can become established as part of our normal behaviour for a number of reasons:-
r , • No one corrects us at the time.
• Applying the bad rule seems to get the job done.
• And most of the time, there are no bad consequences.
• British Rail technician had acquired the habit of bending back old wire rather than
removing it when rewiring a signal box.
• Old wire made a false connection causing signal to fail unsafe (green aspect). Commuter
( ,
train crashed into back of a stationary train contributing to worst British railway accident
for 40 years (Clapham Junction disaster, 1987).
, ,
! The British Rail (BR) technician was a very keen and hard-working person who had never (in his
12 years of service) received any proper training. He had picked up the job by watching other
people and trying things out for himself.
The other part of the story is that the system had procedures for checking on the quality of
signal wiring work, but these were not put into operation at this time. The person who was
r '
supposed to have done the checks was very busy with the Waterloo rewiring scheme and the
,
'-"' checks simply fell out of his list of things to be done. Managerial and supervisory oversights are
very common. It's not necessarily the case that these people are lazy or incompetent. It is often
that they are just very busy with other things.
Someone has called the Clapham accident 'the case of the unrocked boat'. BR had had seven
years without a passenger fatality and the normal checks and balances had grown
imperceptibly slack.
The second example is a case of 'naive physics' in which a large proportion of intelligent
students assumed - as they did in ancient times - that the trajectory of a moving body reflects
the shape of the structure that ejected it. Nearly all of us have got some misconceptions about
the world. Most of the time, they have no consequences; but, occasionally, they can lead to bad
outcomes.
r •
r •
'.
r '
,
, ,
Summarising Error Types
. )
, )
, !
,'i
L _~
n
!
I•. J
'---'
- .)
i
:
, J
.-
8-24 Module 9.8 Human Error Use and/or disclosure is
ITS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
on page 2 of this chapter.
© Copyright 2010
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
,i
~
Types of Error in Maintenance Tasks
i
'-
As aircraft maintenance engineers are human, errors in the industry are inevitable.
When undertaking less frequently performed tasks, there is the possibility of errors of judgment.
If the engineer does not familiarise or refamiliarise himself properly with what needs to be done,
he may mistakenly select the wrong procedure or parts.
,, .
Violation in Aircraft Maintenance
It is an unfortunate fact of life that violations occur in aviation maintenance. Most stem from a
genuine desire to do a good job. Seldom are they acts of vandalism or sabotage. However, they
represent a significant threat to safety as systems are designed assuming people will follow the
( . procedures. There are four types of violations:
• Routine violations;
I , • Situational violations;
L.; • Optimising violations;
• Exceptional violations.
T "
Routine violations are things which have become 'the normal way of doing something' within the
person's work group (e.g. a maintenance team). They can become routine for a number of ,---'
reasons: engineers may believe that procedures may be over prescriptive and violate them to
simplify a task (cutting corners), to save time and effort.
Situational violations occur due to the particular factors that exist at the time, such as time
pressure, high workload, unworkable procedures, inadequate tooling, poor working conditions.
These occur often when, in order to get the job done, engineers consider that a procedure
cannot be followed.
Optimising violations involve breaking the rules for 'kicks'. These are often quite unrelated to the
actual task. The person just uses the opportunity to satisfy a personal need.
Exceptional violations are typified by particular tasks or operating circumstances that make
violations inevitable, no matter how well intentioned the engineer might be.
.)
Examples of routine violations are not performing an engine run after a borescope inspection ("it
never leaks"), or not changing the '0' seals on the engine gearbox drive pad after a borescope
inspection ("they are never damaged").
An example of a situational violation is an incident which occurred where the door of a 8747
came open in-flight. An engineer with a tight deadline discovered that he needed a special jig to
drill off a new door torque tube. The jig was not available, so the engineer decided to drill the
holes by hand on a pillar drill. If he had complied with the maintenance manual he could not
have done the job and the aircraft would have missed the service.
An example of an optimising violation would be an engineer who has to go across the airfield ~.
i
and drives there faster than permitted. ~.
•
)
Time pressure and high workload increase the likelihood of all types of violations occurring.
People weigh up the perceived risks against the perceived benefits, unfortunately the actual " ;
risks can be much higher.
,,
~,
~ j
,
'- -"
-,,
'. J
c_ .;
Perceived
benefits of
violating
\ .
®
Perceived costs
,.
o Benefits exceed costs. Violation likely.
( .
Figure 8.8: Relationship of benefits to cost of violations
Unlike errors, violations are deliberate acts. People weigh up the costs and benefits of an act of
non-compliance and when the benefits exceed the possible costs they are likely to violate. The
effects of 'mental economics' have been shown in a wide variety of work and everyday
I • situations.
i
Benefits are immediate. Costs are remote from experience, and-in the case of
C'
,
accidents-seem unlikely.
Table 8.1: Perceived benefits and Perceived costs of violations
Table 8.1 shows the factors that might lie on the plus and minus sides of the mental balance
sheet relating to violations.
For many acts of non-compliance, however, experience shows that violating is an easier way of
working and brings no obvious bad effects. In short, the benefits of non-compliance are often
seen to outweigh the costs.
The challenge here is not so much to increase the costs of violating (by stiffer penalties, etc.)
but to try to increase the perceived benefits of compliance. And that means having procedures
that are workable and that describe what are obviously the quickest and most efficient ways of
doing the job. Any lack of trust caused by inappropriate or clumsy procedures will increase the
perceived benefits of violating. Indeed, some jobs can only be done by deviating from the
procedures.
These are some of the beliefs that lead people to violate. A number of them relate to the widely
held attitude that violating is the prerogative of the skilled person. Their skill shows them how to
bend the rules and get away with it.
Other beliefs have to do with the fact that violations may be going on all over the worksite.
Consequently people feel powerless to avoid them. Indeed, they might feel that violations are
expected of them. They may also be aware that managers turn a blind eye to violations that get
the job done and so meet tight deadlines.
i
Bad procedures ~ J
It would be a mistake to think that most violations were due to bloody-mindedness on the part of
the workforce. As we have already seen, situational or necessary violations arise because
In the nuclear industry, for example, nearly 70 per cent of all human performance problems
have been traced to bad procedures. That is, procedures that gave the wrong information, or
were inappropriate or unworkable in the present situation, or were not known about, or were out
of date, or that could not be found, or that could not be understood, or that simply had not been
written to cover this job.
Bad, absent or unworkable documentation is not a monopoly of the nuclear power industry.
\ '
Situational factors
• Time pressure
• High workload
• Unworkable procedures
• Inadequate equipment
• Bad working conditions
• Supervisors turn blind eye
L.., These are some of the situational factors that promote violations. Several of the factors also
crop up on the list of local error-producing factors.
L Removing or moderating these local error- and violation-producing factors is a major part of
managing unsafe acts.
In many highly-proceduralised industries, it is common for the workforce to write their own
procedures as to how jobs should be done. These are jealously guarded and passed on to new
members of the workgroup. They are generally known as 'black books'.
!
c...,
Notice from this slide that over half of both operators and managers use these 'black books'.
These results come from the procedure-usage survey introduced on the previous slide.
r • These are some the reasons given why workers for not following procedures. These are
universal reasons for not following procedures and manuals. Any attempt at improving
compliance must address these problems.
f'
Violation types
• Corner-cutting violations
• Thrill-seeking violations
• Violations to get job done
r-
L This shows a preliminary break down of violation types.
, ,
• Corner-cutting-or routine violations-are committed to avoid unnecessary effort or to .: -'
• B747 was about to make first flight after servicing in which oil lines on one engine had
been changed,
• Finding oil leaks on engine run, technicians tightened suspect oil lines.
• Skipped additional engine run because tug had arrived.
• Tech's followed alc to terminal where they performed an engine dry spin. No oil leaks
were found,
• Oil leak from engine caused IFSD and diversion.
Thrill-seeking violations
• Most obvious examples are to be found in the handling of vehicles: speeding, cutting in,
tail-gating, 'road rage', etc.
• We do these things for the 'joy of speed' or to let out angry feelings.
• Many towing and ground contact accidents are due to thrill-seeking,
• Males violate more than females, the young violate more than the old. Similar differences
not found for errors.
'. J
r.
i Getting job done: Example
L
(.
ic·.
i
L"
i The rules prohibit shunters from remaining between wagons when joining them together. But
~ sometimes the connecting shackle is too short to be coupled when buffers are at full
extension. To do job, shunter has to get between wagons and hook on shackle when buffers
are Later becomes an easier way of working , and hence a routine violation.
Figure 8.9: Violations become the Norm
i '
• Errors are unintended. Violations are deliberate (the act not the occasional bad
consequences).
l.,.; • Errors arise from information problems. Violations are shaped mainly by attitudes, beliefs,
group norms and safety culture.
The distinction between errors and violations depends upon the following factors:-
(
Intentionality: We do not generally intend to make slips, lapses or mistakes. Except when they
L have become so routinised as to be automatic, people do generally intend to commit the actions
that deviate from procedures. It is important to note, however, that while they may intend the
r, ). non-compliant actions, they do not generally intend the occasionally bad consequences. Only
saboteurs intend both the act and its bad consequences.
r -,
r Information versus motivation: Errors arise as the result of informational problems, either in the
head or in the world. In short, errors arise from informational problems and are generally
,. corrected by improving the information, either in the person's head or in the workplace.
i Violations, on the other hand, arise largely from motivational factors, from beliefs, attitudes,
norms and from the organisational culture at large. These are the things that need to be fixed if
we are to reduce the non-compliance to good rules.
Demographics: Men violate more than women and the young violate more than the old. The
same does not apply to errors.
i '
!
"-
In addition, engineers may pick up some 'bad rules', leading to bad habits during their working
life. i
; )
i
i
,. j
i
\..J
i
~- j
~,
", . I
I
" -,i
, I
n
I
I
L :
~
I
! !
8-32 Module 9.8 Human Error
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
'-
,", ,
Integrated Training System
,
L.;
Designed in association with the
c!ub66pro.co.uk question practice aid
Type 1 errors are not a safety concern per se, except that it means that resources are not being
used most effectively, time being wasted on further investigation of items which are not genuine
,. faults.
Type 2 errors are of most concern since, if the fault (such as a crack) remains undetected, it can
r - have serious consequences (as was the case in the Aloha accident, where cracks remained
i
'- undetected).
., Reason's Study of Aviation Maintenance Engineering
i
L: Reason analysed the reports of 122 maintenance incidents occurring within a major airline over
a 3 year period. He identified the main causes as being:
r ~
L • Omissions (56%)
r .
• Incorrect installation (30%)
! !
• Wrong parts (8%)
• Other (6%)
,
It is likely that Reason's findings are representative for the aircraft maintenance industry as a
L whole. Omissions can occur for a variety of reason, such as forgetting, deviation from a
procedure (accidental or deliberate), or due to distraction. The B737 double engine oil loss
incident, in which the HP rotor drive covers were not refitted is an example of omission.
Incorrect installation is unsurprising, as there is usually only one way in which something can be
r -, taken apart but many possible ways in which it can be reassembled. Reason illustrates this with
I a simple example of a bolt and several nuts (see Figure 8.10), asking the questions (a) how
many ways can this be disassembled? (the answer being 1) and (b) how many ways can it be
I . reassembled? (the answer being about 40,000, excluding errors of omisSion!).
,
L
f ~
,
In the BAC1-11 accident in June 1990, the error was fitting the wrong bolts to the windscreen.
I .
,
This illustrates well the category of 'wrong parts'.
L
i
Accidents i ,
;JtiK
Serious Incidents
Incidents
Errors
Minor Events
I
. J
Figure 8.11: The "Iceberg Model" of Accidents
!
Thankfully, most errors made by aircraft maintenance engineers do not have catastrophic '. J
results. This does not mean that this might not be the result should they occur again.
Errors that do not cause accidents but still cause a problem are known as incidents. This '.-.j
subject was introduced at the beginning of this document in Chapter 1, "Incidents Attributable
To Human Factors I Human Error", which gave examples of aviation incidents relating to aircraft
maintenance errors. Some incidents are more high profile than others, such as errors causing
significant in-flight events that, fortuitously, or because of the skills of the pilot, did not become
accidents. Other incidents are more mundane and do not become serious because of defences
built into the maintenance system. However, all incidents are significant to the aircraft
maintenance industry, as they may warn of a potential future accident should the error occur in
different circumstances. As a consequence, all maintenance incidents have to be reported to .--,
the UK Civil Aviation Authority Mandatory Occurrence Reporting Scheme (MORS). These , ,j
data are used to disclose trends and, where necessary, implement action to reduce the
likelihood or criticality of further errors. In the UK, the Confidential Human Factors Incident
Reporting Programme (CHIRP) scheme provides an alternative reporting mechanism for
individuals who want to report safety concerns and incidents confidentially.
It is likely that the greatest proportion of errors made by aircraft maintenance engineers are .J
spotted almost immediately they are made and corrected. The engineer may detect his own
error, or it may be picked up by colleagues, supervisors or quality control. In these cases, the
engineer involved should (it is hoped) learn from his error and therefore (it is hoped) be less .. ,/
It is vital that aircraft maintenance engineers learn from their own errors and from the errors
made by others in the industry. These powerful and persuasive lessons are the positive aspects
of human error.
When an error occurs in the maintenance system of an airline, the engineer who last worked on
r'
the aircraft is usually considered to be 'at fault'. The engineer may be reprimanded, given
remedial training or simply told not to make the same error again. However, blame does not
L
necessarily act as a positive force in aircraft maintenance: it can discourage engineers from
, 'coming clean' about their errors. They may cover up a mistake or not report an incident. It may
I . also be unfair to blame the engineer if the error results from a failure or weakness inherent in
l...J
the system which the engineer has accidentally discovered (for example, a latent failure such as
r , a poor procedure drawn up by an aircraft manufacturer - possibly an exceptional violation).
!
L
The UK Civil Aviation Authority has stressed in CAAIP Leaflet 11-50 (previously published as
Airworthiness Notice No. 71) that it "seeks to provide an environment in which errors may be
i openly investigated in order that the contributing factors and root causes of maintenance errors
~
can be addressed". To facilitate this, it is considered that an unpremeditated or inadvertent
r' lapse should not incur any punitive action, but a breach of professionalism may do so (e.g.
L where an engineer causes deliberate harm or damage, has been involved previously in similar
lapses, attempted to hide their lapse or part in a mishap, etc.).
r "'
'
.
.. '
r •
I
~
r .
L
,.
r
L...
I
I
'
I
. ,.
, J
, J
:. i
Intentionally Blank
.....,
,
:~ j
.L J!
.,
L j
:
.....,
I
'- J
:. J
-,
I
I
• 1
To prevent errors from occurring, it is necessary to predict where they are most likely to occur
! ,
and then to put in place preventative measures. Incident reporting schemes (such as MORS) do
this for the industry as a whole. Within a maintenance organisation, data on errors, incidents
and accidents should be captured with a Safety Management System (SMS), which should
provide mechanisms for identifying potential weak spots and error-prone activities or situations.
Output from this should guide local training, company procedures, the introduction of new
defences, or the modification of existing defences.
I 1
Ultimately, maintenance organisations have to compromise between implementing measures to
prevent, reduce or detect errors, and making a profit. Some measures cost little (such as
L renewing light bulbs in the hangar); others cost a lot (such as employing extra staff to spread
! "
i
~
workload). Incidents tend to result in short term error mitigation measures but if an organisation
has no incidents for a long time (or has them but does not know about them or appreciate their
significance), there is a danger of complacency setting in and cost reduction strategies eroding
the defences against error. Reason refers to this as "the unrocked boat" (Figure 8.12).
, ,
c: !
-
.S!
u
Q)
(5
Beller defences
conver1edto
~
• I
.1
,1
..... ,!
11. increased
production
------------t... Production
Figure 8.12: The lifespan of a hypothetical organisation through the production - protection
space.
It is important that organisations balance profit and costs, and try to ensure that the defences
which are put in place are the most cost-effective in terms of trapping errors and preventing
catastrophic outcomes.
Ultimately, it is the responsibility of each and every aircraft maintenance engineer to take every
possible care in his work and be vigilant for error (see Chapter 3). On the whole, aircraft
maintenance engineers are very conscious of the importance of their work and typically expend
considerable effort to prevent injuries, prevent damage, and to keep the aircraft they work on • J
safe.
~- '
-,
, j
~
,
,
I ,
I
Error Management
'-'
The purpose is to provide maintenance organisations with a sense of what techniques are
available to deal with 'here and now' human performance problems. It is not definitive. It merely
provides a sample of what is being used in airline engineering organisations in various parts of
the world. Details are given to enable you to follow up on techniques that you feel could be
I' useful in your company.
,
. ,
~
It must be stressed that an effective Error Management system involves the whole organisation.
,, Human Factors and Error Management training is not just for those who get their hands dirty. All
,i the modules are designed to be suitable for all levels of the system. Comprehension and the
~
judged relevance of this kind of training material has been tria lied successfully in a number of
,,
,
aircraft maintenance organisations (British Airways Engineering, Singapore Airlines Engineering
Company, Cathay Pacific).
L
There is no one best Error Management system. Different mixes of techniques and practices
suit different organisations. What this package offers is a set of guiding principles for error
management and a 'shopping list' of measures and techniques for managing error at different
r . levels of the system. Of course, another way of looking at this catalogue is as a spur to creating
your own home-grown Error Management system.
• BAC 1-11 (6/90): Left windscreen blown out at 17,300 ft. Capt. half sucked out of a/c.
Window installed with wrong bolts.
, ,
; • Embraer 120 (9/91): Fatal crash due to in-flight loss of a partially secured de-ice boot on
, left leading edge of horizontal stabiliser. Upper attachment screws missing.
'-
• B747-258 (10/92): # 3 engine and pylon separated from wing. Fuse pin fatigue. Probable
, . cause: System to ensure structural integrity by inspection failed.
I
L
The B74 7 accident occurred shortly after takeoff on 4 October 1992. As the aircraft was
,' climbing through 6500 ft, the no. 3 engine and pylon separated from the wing and collided with
the no. 4 engine which was torn off. The flight crew declared a mayday and requested a return
,, '
Use andfor disclosure is Module 9.8 Human Error 8-39
TIS Integrated Training System
( . governed by the statement
on page 2 of this chapter. {c) r.nnvrinht ?01 0
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
to runway 27. However, the leading edge of the wing was severely damaged and the use of
several important flight systems was lost or limited. The aircraft crashed into a high-rise building.
Two primary causes.
The design and certification of the B747 was found to be inadequate to provide the required , ;
level of safety.
The system to ensure structural integrity by inspection failed. The event was probably initiated
by fatigue in the inboard midspar fuse-pin on the no. 3 engine and pylon.
The B757 took off at 12.42 on 2 October 1996. Five minutes later, the crew reported instrument
problems and requested a return to the airport. During the initial climb the airspeed and altitude
, ,
indications were too low and a windshear warning sounded in calm winds. On its return, the
aircraft kept descending and impacted the water with the left wing. Preliminary investigation of
,,
the wreckage found masking tape blocking three static ports on the left side. They had been I
,
applied before washing and polishing of the aircraft prior to the accident flight.
kts in 3 seconds. Shortly after smoke filled the cockpit. Subsequently, the aircraft crashed into
the Everglades killing all on board. In the cargo hold were boxes containing oxygen generators.
The accident investigators concluded that accident was due to:
• Failure prepare, package, identify and track unexpended chemical oxygen generators
before handing them over to the airline.
• Failure of the airline to properly oversee its contract maintenance programme.
• Failure of the Regulator to require smoke detection and fire suppression systems in 'l
!
Class D cargo compartments. The regulator also failed to monitor the airline's contracted ;, J
maintenance program.
• Various unsafe acts and/or equipment states that jeopardised the airworthiness of the
aircraft.
• A failure of the system to detect and rectify these danqerous conditions before the
,
aircraft was released to the line. I
" ]
When we hear of maintenance-related accidents such as these, we naturally assume that the
primary fault lies with the individual maintainer(s) at the sharp end, the person or people who
actually touched the aircraft. True, these form an important part of the accident sequence, but
they are only the initiating events. For them to have had a bad outcome, it means that the
system's defences, barriers and safeguards failed as well. No accident is the sole responsibility
, j
of a single maintainer. We can never eliminate human error, but we can always improve the
, '
systems designed to check and correct errors. As we shall see later, systems are easier to
manage than people--assuming, as is generally the case, that we have a competent and well-
motivated workforce.
r '
I
L YOU CAN'T CHANGE THE HUMAN CONDITION, BUT YOU CAN CHANGE THE
CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH PEOPLE WORK.
! '
Error management: What do you aim for?
:[ '
'-- Person
f !
r '
Workplace
Organisation
r •
!'
Figure 8.13: What to aim for?
How do you best reduce errors and limit their bad effects. They are four possible target areas:
,r '
the person, the task, the workplace and the organisation as a whole. Most organisations aim for
the person because they believe that people are more changeable than situations.
, '
i
~'.~_,,,,,,,,,,p"4#i0"" Write another procedure
'--
r :
,
'--
, ,
Blame and train: 'Carpet' the error-maker, or discipline him, or tell him to be more careful, and
then, if necessary, send him for retraining.
l i
Write another procedure: All industries tend to write procedures to prohibit actions that have
been implicated in some event or incident. The result is that the range of permitted actions is
often less than the range of actions necessary to get the job done.
Search for the 'missing piece': When these measures fail (and they usually do), managers start
looking for psychological ways of finding the piece that will remove violations and errors.
Somewhere out there, they think, is a psychologist who can come up with the 'magic bullet'
solution. i
, j
~, J
· .
:. j
,
L j
\. J
: j
·,
· .
, ~
.1
l. )
· i
i '
1
'-
,'
,
Comprehensive Error Management, however, prefers to focus most of its efforts on:-
:
~
f :
L
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.8 Human Error 8-43
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
f ' on page 2 of this chapter. CC) r.nnvrinht ?n1 n
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the "!
i
, J
,
problems likely to come? And what can we do to thwart them before they cause damage and
losses? , )
, J
In the case of maintenance errors ...
....,
i
• The 'swamps' are task, workplace and organisational factors that provoke errors. i
i. ,
• The defences are system safeguards and barriers that detect and recover errors before
they can have a bad outcome.
• Both of these go to make up an effective HERO (Human Error Reduction Operation). , j
The future-directed measures in the HERO toolbox are aimed at identifying and removing ....,,
'swamps' and at creating more effective defences against those errors that will inevitably c j
escape these measures.
• Identifying task, workplace and organisational problems that could combine to cause
some future incident or accident? Being proactive as well as reactive.
, ,
I
To use the mosquito analogy again, there are two ways of dealing with the underlying and
fundamental problems. One way is to trace mosquitoes (errors) back to their point of origin - to
their breeding grounds - and then eliminate them. The other is to use this knowledge to destroy , ,i
potential breeding grounds before they create problems.
, J
In what follows, we will review a variety of techniques currently in use in the world's airline
maintenance facilities. Some of them start with an event and then work back into the system to
identify and remove their fundamental causes. Others involve regular system 'health checks' in
which potential problems are identified and corrected before they cause trouble.
'. 1
8-44 Module 9.8 Human Error Use and/or disclosure is
TTS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 201 0 on page 2 of this chapter.
Integrated Training System
L Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
! '
I Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA)
, . MANAGEABILITY OF ERRORS
Active involvement of the technicians closest to the error reflects the MEDA principle that most
of the factors that contribute to an error can be managed. Processes can be changed,
, , procedures improved or corrected, facilities enhanced, and best practices shared. Because
error most often results from a series of contributing factors, correcting or removing just one or
two of these factors can prevent the error from recurring.
, .
I
r.
• Prevention strategies.
• Feedback. :i
~- j
EVENT
An event occurs, such as a gate return or air turn back. It is the responsibility of the
maintenance organization to select the error-caused events that will be investigated. · i
r-"1!
DECISION
After fixing the problem and returning the airplane to service, the operator makes a decision:
Was the event maintenance-related? If yes, the operator performs a MEDA investigation. .,
i
INVESTIGA TlON
· ,,
Using the MEDA results form, the operator carries· out an investigation. The trained investigator
uses the form to record general information about the airplane, when the maintenance and the
event occurred, the event that began the investigation, the error that caused the event, the
factors contributing to the error, and a list of possible prevention strategies.
,
'- J
PREVENTION STRATEGIES
The operator reviews, prioritises, implements, and then tracks prevention strategies (process i ,
improvements) in order to avoid or reduce the likelihood of similar errors in the future. ,
FEEDBACK
The operator provides feedback to the maintenance workforce so technicians know that
changes have been made to the maintenance system as a result of the MEDA process. The
operator is responsible for affirming the effectiveness of employees' participation and validating
their contribution to the MEDA process by sharing investigation results with them. l .J
,,
I
• i
• .J
'. j
8-46 Module 9.8 Human Error Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
,... Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
\ '
2. Investigation
Finds that Event 3. Find the Maintenance
1. Event Mechanic or Inspector I-
Was Caused by
Occurs Who Did the Work
Mechanic/Inspector
,. PerfOImance
: '
4. Interview Person 5, Carry out F ollow- 6, Add the Results
• Find Contributing Up hlterviews, as Form Investigation
,' 4 Factors Necessary, in Order hUol1nation to a
• Get Ideas fOl' to Get All Relevant Maintenance Event
I-
Process Contributing Factors DataBase
Improvement hilormatioll
Management Resolve
,, . The resolve of management at the maintenance operation is key to successful MEDA
implementation, Specifically, after completing a program of MEDA support from Boeing,
managers must assume responsibility for the following activities before starting investigations:
,,
i MEDA is a long-term commitment, rather than a quick fix, Operators new to the process are
L,.;
susceptible to "normal workload syndrome". This occurs once the enthusiasm generated by
, '
initial training of investigation teams has diminished and the first few investigations have been
,
completed, In addition to the expectation that they will continue to use MEDA, newly trained
investigators are expected to maintain their normal responsibilities and workloads. Management
c • at all levels can maintain the ongoing commitment required by providing systematic tracking of
MEDA findings and visibility of error and improvement trends.
Summary
,I The Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA) process offered by Boeing continues to help
~
operators of airplanes identify what causes maintenance errors and how to prevent similar
errors in the future. Because MEDA is a tool for investigating the factors that contribute to an
error, maintenance organizations can discover exactly what led to an error and remedy those
factors. By using MEDA, operators can avoid the rework, lost revenue, and potential safety
problems related to events caused by maintenance errors.
,.
[
L
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.8 Human Error 8-47
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © Copyright 2010
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
,! ,
C, i
! ,
,....,
!
, J
L j
Intentionally Blank
I
j
i
! )
! ,
'_ J
[ , • Negative face as revealed by bad events, near misses and the like.
, • Positive face = system's intrinsic resistance to its operational hazards.
• Too few bad outcomes to steer by.
I ' • We need to measure the processes contributing to resistance (or vulnerability)
L
Most of the time when we speak of 'safety' we are usually referring, either directly or indirectly,
I ' to moments of 'unsafety', or their comparative absence over a given period of time. Safety is
usually measured in terms of the number of incidents or accidents that occur during a given
interval of time, say a six- or twelve-month period. Most technical people like these kinds of
measures because they can be quantified fairly easily. But what happens when you start having
so few bad events that there is actually more noise present than signal. This is what has
happened in the aviation industry. Yes, there are still accidents and maintenance incidents, but
they are comparatively few and far between. And they tell you very little about the true safety
health of your system.
[. Intrinsic Safety
L
Disturbances
,I '
Vulnerable System
,
c....
r'
i
Average System
I '
Figure 8.17: Diagram depicting the effects on safety of a disturbance, for different system types
Figure 8.17 tries to spell out what is meant by the positive face of safety. Imagine a ball bearing
i resting on three differently-shaped blocks. Imagine also that each arrangement is being agitated
L by external forces. These forces are equivalent to the operational hazards of your business.
,
c....
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.8 Human Error 8-49
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © Coovriaht 2010
Integrated Training System ~
Inspection of the slide shows that in all three arrangements, the ball-bearing could be tipped "; i
over the edge. But it is clearly far harder for this to happen in the bottom configuration, ·,
,
We cannot always prevent the chance combinations of factors that cause accidents, but we can L j
work to make our organisation less vulnerable to them. This is the true goal of risk management
- not zero accidents, an impossible target when gravity, terrain, weather and human error
continue to exist - but achieving the maximum degree of resistance to their bad effects.
• j
"j
•
Organisations
,
, !
Following on from the ideas expressed on figure 8.17, we can imagine a cigar-shaped space-
the safety space - with one end labelled as 'maximum achievable resistance' and the other as
'extreme vulnerability'. Each maintenance (or any other kind of) organisation occupies some
position along this resistant-vulnerable dimension. The space is cigar-shaped because most • J
organisations will lie in the intermediate zone, with only relatively few at either extreme.
:. j
'cowboy' organisations can be preserved over given periods of time by good luck. Chance does
not make moral judgements. It affects both good and bad companies.
·,,
, ,
'. .J
· ,.
, j
• J
'--,
Commitment
Competence
Cognisance
L
, '
Figure 8.18 spells out the realistic safety goal of every organisation: to reach the zone of
maximum resistance and then stay there for as long as possible.
f,
'-- Two things are needed:
,.
r'
f
r .
I
Risk is calculated as a function of both the likelihood of occurrence and the severity of the likely
,
outcome. The Risk Matrix shown in the slide is based upon the one regularly used by British i j
Airways Safety Services in their monthly safety bulletin 'Flywise'. :.. J
A: Severe, a rare incident requiring the highest priority for resources and action. .....,
B: High, incidents of significant concern which take priority over other incidents. , i
c: Medium, incidents requiring the attention and action of a line department.
:
~. )
i
D: Low, an incident of low concern which normally requires no further action. r-;
'. ,
\.. :
,
, :
~,
,
'. J
8-52 Module 9.8 Human Error Use andfor disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System governed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
c '
I, :
, '
" '
i.....;
,c ,
,
[ ,
TTS Integrated
,, ,
!
~
,
'
Training System
\
,
,
,-
-,
Module 9
Human Factors
i, '
,
'-
,
I
'
9.9 Hazards in the Workplace
,
~
, '
I ,
r
,,
i:
'-
c '
i
Copyright Notice
© Copyright. All worldwide rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any other means whatsoever: i.e. ,,
photocopy, electronic, mechanical recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of
-,
Total Training Support Ltd.
.,
Knowledge Levels - Category A, 81, 82 and C Aircraft
Maintenance Licence
Basic knowledge for categories A, B1 and B2 are indicated by the allocation of knowledge levels indicators (1,2 or
3) against each applicable subject. Category C applicants must meet either the category B1 or the category B2
basic knowledge levels.
, ,,
The knowledge level indicators are defined as follows:
LEVEL 1
• A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
• A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• An ability to apply that knowledge.
Objectives:
• The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
• The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
• The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
• The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the . ,
subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
,
~, -'
LEVEL 3
r-,
• A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
• A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive , , !
manner.
Objectives:
• The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects. ". !
• The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
• The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
• The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
• The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's ~
,
instructions.
, ,,
• The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
l j
, ,,
9-2 Module 9.9 Hazards in the Workplace
Use and/or disclosure is
TIS Integrated Training System govemed by the statement
© Copyright 2010 on page 2 of this chapter.
Integrated Training System
Designed in association with the
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
L Table of Contents
,'
,.
r •
I
!
9-3
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.9 Hazards in the Workplace TIS Integrated Training System
governed by the statement
on page 2 of this chapter. © Copyright 2010
Integrated Training System '1
Designed in association with the ,, ,
• J
l,J
· j
.,,
l )
c_ !
l ;
,
,,
L j
,,
Chapter 9.9 Hazards in the Workplace
,. Hazards in the workplace tend to be a health and safety issue, relating to the protection of
!
individuals at work. All workplaces have hazards and aircraft maintenance engineering is no
exception. Health and safety is somewhat separate from human factors and this chapter
r, ' therefore gives only a very brief overview of the issues relating the aircraft maintenance
,
~
engineering.
,, .
i
~
Recognising and Avoiding Hazards
r 1
r ' Many of these have been addressed earlier in this document (e.g. Chapter 5 "Physical
i Environment").
w
f '
Maintenance organisations should appoint someone with health and safety responsibilities. ,
..
' ;
In brief, a maintenance organisation has a duty under health and safety legislation to:
• identify hazards in the workplace; n :
• remove them where possible; .,,
,
If hazards cannot be removed from the workplace, employees should be made aware that they
exist and how to avoid them. This can be effected through training and waming signs. To be
effective, warnings signs must:
• clearly identify the hazard(s);
• describe the danger (i.e. electric shock, radiation, etc);
• inform employees what to do or not to do. ,
• j
The sign must attract an engineer's attention, it must be visible and it must be understandable
to the people it is aimed at. Additionally, in the maintenance industry, it must be durable enough : ,
to remain effective, often for years, in areas where dust and the elements can be present.
,
Positive recommendations are more effective than negative ones. For example, the statement · .I
"Stay behind yellow line on floor" is better than "Do not come near this equipment". Warning
signs should contain a single word indicating the degree of risk associated with the hazard:
DANGER denotes that the hazard is immediate and could cause grave, irreversible damage or
injury. CAUTION indicates a hazard of lesser magnitude. The sign should also detail how to
avoid or manage the risk.
· )
~
,,
: ;
: ,
, )
,
·,
\ J
", ,,
I
,
;
Every aircraft maintenance engineer should be aware that he can influence the safety of those
with whom he works.
Thus, in an aircraft maintenance organisation, the health and safety policy might include
statements applicable to engineers such as the need to:
• Take reasonable care of the health and safety of themselves and others who may be
: "
affected by their acts or omissions at work;
• Co-operate with the maintenance organisation to ensure that statutory requirements
concerning health and safety at work are met;
, '
• Work in accordance with any safety instruction and/or training received;
• Inform their supervisor or management of work situations that represent an immediate or
, '
potential danger to health and safety at work and any shortcomings in protection
arrangements;
• Not interfere intentionally or recklessly with, nor misuse, anything provided in the
,' interests of health and safety.
,
,
,
.
I '
Safety in the Working Environment
L Engineers should ensure that they keep the working environment safe. Clutter, rubbish, etc. is
not only a nuisance to others, but can constitute a danger (e.g. a trip hazard, fire hazard, etc.).
In addition, engineers should be careful when working on the line not to leave objects when a
L job has been completed. Foreign Object Damage (FOD) is a risk to aircraft operating at an
airfield.
I '
I
L
I
i
' Safety When Working On Aircraft
L Before operating or working on aircraft system, an engineer should carry out clearance checks
around moveable surfaces (e.g. flying controls, landing gear, flaps, etc,). Deactivation
,, procedures should be followed (e.g. pull circuit breakers, isolate valves, disconnect power, etc.).
,,
i
~ Notification of deactivation through the provision of adequate placard in key locations is
essential to inform others of system status.
r, -1
,
,
'--'
Use and/or disclosure is Module 9.9 Hazards in the Workplace 9-7
governed by the statement TIS Integrated Training System
on page 2 of this chapter. © Copyright 2010
Integrated Training System ,....,
Designed in association with the ~ .J
club66pro.co.uk question practice aid
.,,
"
Intentionally Blank
: )
, i ,
i
, J
i ,
i
~
Dealing with Emergencies
Careful handling of health and safety in the maintenance environment should serve to minimise
risks. However, should health and safety problems occur, all personnel should know as far as
reasonably practical how to deal with emergency situations.
Appropriate guidance and training should be provided by the maintenance organisation. The
organisation should also provide procedures and facilities for dealing with emergency situations
r ' and these must be adequately communicated to all personnel. Maintenance organisations
should appoint and train one or more first aiders.
Emergency drills are of great value in potentially dangerous environments. Aircraft maintenance
engineers should take part in these wherever possible. Knowledge of what to do in an
( . emergency can save lives.
I
~
l. J
i !
·,
,...,
I
l j
, ,
'i
,I
~ j
, ,
Intentionally Blank
· I
; ,j
· ,i
,
i
j
I l j
r.
Risk Assessment
,, . A risk assessment is an important step in protecting aircraft maintenance staff, as well as
complying with the law. It helps you focus on the risks that really matter in your workplace - the
ones with the potential to cause real harm. In many instances, straightforward measures can
r • readily control risks, for example ensuring spillages are cleaned up promptly so people do not
I slip, or cupboard drawers are kept closed to ensure people do not trip.
r ! The law does not expect you to eliminate all risk, but you are required to protect people as far
as 'reasonably practicable'.
r' This is not the only way to do a risk assessment, there are other methods that work well,
I particularly for more complex risks and circumstances. However, this method is the most
straightforward for most organisations.
Accidents and ill health can ruin lives and affect your business too if output is lost, machinery is
I' damaged, insurance costs increase or you have to go to court. You are legally required to
L assess the risks in your workplace so that you put in place a plan to control the risks.
r •
L How to assess the risks in your workplace
Follow the five steps:
,
I .
,
, ,
If you work in a larger organisation, you could ask a health and safety adviser to help you. If you
, , are not confident, get help from someone who is competent. In all cases, you should make sure
that you involve your staff or their representatives in the process. They will have useful
information about how the work is done that will make your assessment of the risk more
thorough and effective. But remember, you are responsible for seeing that the assessment is
carried out properly.
When thinking about your risk assessment, remember: a hazard is anything that may cause
harm, such as chemicals, electricity, working from ladders, an open drawer etc; the risk is the , J
chance, high or low, that somebody could be harmed by these and other hazards, together with
an indication of how serious the harm could be.
,. ;
· )
· 1
~ .J
o. J
o ,
,
L .J
'.- j
, j
-.
• J