0% found this document useful (0 votes)
150 views5 pages

K-Gamma and K-Beta Function

The document presents two limits involving the k-gamma and k-beta functions. Theorem 2.1 proves that the limit of the k-beta function Bk(ax + c, bx + d) approaches a constant value as x approaches infinity. Theorem 2.2 proves that the limit of the ratio of two k-gamma functions Γk(bx + k) and Γk(ax + k) approaches another constant value as x approaches infinity. The proofs utilize properties of the gamma function and apply limits as x approaches infinity.

Uploaded by

ketashi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
150 views5 pages

K-Gamma and K-Beta Function

The document presents two limits involving the k-gamma and k-beta functions. Theorem 2.1 proves that the limit of the k-beta function Bk(ax + c, bx + d) approaches a constant value as x approaches infinity. Theorem 2.2 proves that the limit of the ratio of two k-gamma functions Γk(bx + k) and Γk(ax + k) approaches another constant value as x approaches infinity. The proofs utilize properties of the gamma function and apply limits as x approaches infinity.

Uploaded by

ketashi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no.

33, 1613 - 1617

A Limit for the k-Gamma and k-Beta Function


Valmir Krasniqi

Department of Mathematics, University of Prishtina


Prishtinë 10000, Republic of Kosova
[email protected]

Dedicated to Professor Emrush Gashi on the occasion of his 71th birthday

Abstract
In this paper, we present some limits for k− Gamma function and k−
Beta function by using properties asymptotic of k− Gamma function.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 33B15, 26D15

Keywords: k-gamma functions, k-beta function

1 Introduction
The table of integrals ([2]) contains some evaluations that can be derived by
elementary means from the gamma function, defined by
∞
Γ(a) = xa−1 e−x dx (1)
0

The convergence of the integral in (1) requires a > 0. The techniques


developed here will be employed in the future publications. The reader will
find in [1] analytic information about this important function.
The gamma function represents the extension of factorial to real parame-
ters. The value

Γ(n) = (n − 1)!, for n ∈ N (2)

is elementary. On the other hand, the special value


1 √
Γ( ) = π (3)
2
1614 V. Krasniqi

is equivalent to the well - know normal integral


∞
1 1
exp(−t2 )dt = Γ( ). (4)
2 2
0

The reader will find in ([1]) proofs of Legendre’s duplication formula


1 Γ(2x) π
Γ(x + ) = , (5)
2 Γ(x)22x−1

that produces for x = m ∈ N the values



1 π (2m)!
Γ(m + ) = 2m · . (6)
2 2 m!

2 Main Result
2.1 A limit for the k- Beta function
Let
1
1 y
t k −1 (1 − t) k −1 dt, x, y, k > 0
x
Bk (x, y) =
k
0

be the k -Beta function(see [3]).


The following identity, connection the Γk , Bk function, is well - known that
(7)

Γk (x)Γk (y)
Bk (x, y) = (7)
Γk (x + y)
∞ tk
where Γk (x) = tx−1 e− k dt, k- gamma function it is also known that
0

lim Γk (x) = Γ(x) (8)


k→1

Our aim is to prove the following result:

Theorem 2.1 For all a, b > 0; c, d ≥ 0 on has (9)


  x1 a
ak · bk
b

lim kBk (ax + c, bx + d) = a+b (9)


x→∞ (a + b) k
A limit for the k-Gamma and k-Beta function 1615

Proof.- Since
x
Γk (x) = k k −1 Γ( )
x
(10)
k
and
√  1 1 
Γk (x + 1) = 2πxxx e−x 1 + + O( 2 ) , (11)
12x x
and Γ(x + 1) = xΓ(x), we get (see [4])

√  1 1 
x−1 −x
Γk (x) = 2πxx e 1+ + O( 2 ) , (12)
12x x
By relations (7) and (10)
Γk (ax + c)Γk (bx + d)
Bk (ax + c, bx + d) =
Γk ((a + b)x + c + d)
   
ax+c
−1 bx+d
−1
k k ·k k
ax+c
Γk k Γk k bx+d

= (a+b)x+c+d
−1
k k Γk ([(a + b)x + c + d]/k)
1 Γ( x + k ) · Γ( kb x + kd )
a c
= · k a+b (13)
k Γ( k x + c+d k
)
a b c d
If k
= A, k
= B, k
= C, k
=D:

1 Γ(Ax + C)Γ(Bx + D)
·
Bk (ax + c, bx + d) = = (14)
k Γ((A + B)x + C + D)
 
1 2π(Ax + C)(Ax + C)Ax+C−1 · e−(Ax+C) 2π(Bx + D)(Bx + D)Bx+D−1 e−(Bx+D)
= ·  ×
k 2π[(A + B)x + C + D)((A + B)x + C + D)(A+B)x+C+D−1 · e−((A+B)x+C+D)
  
1
1 + 12(Ax+C) + O( x12 ) 1 + 12(Bx+D)
1
+ O( x12 )
× 1
1 + 12[(A+B)x+C+D)] + O( x12 )
in what follows remark that e−[(A+B)x+C+D] = e−(Ax+C) · e−(Bx+D) , and that
the following limit is true:
1
lim (Ax + B) x = 1, A > 0, B ≥ 0. (15)
x→∞

Now, after simplifications in (14), and by taking into account limits of type
(15) and the obvious relation
 1 1  x1
1+ + O( 2 ) −→ 1,
12(Ex + F ) x
1616 V. Krasniqi

as x → ∞ for E > 0, F ≥ 0, all is reduced to the calculation of a limit


Ax+C−1 Bx+D−1
(Ax + C) x · (Bx + D) x
lim (A+B)x+C+D−1
x→∞
[(A + B)x + C + D] x

Which by using again (15) and

(Ax + C)A · (Bx + D)B AA · B B


lim =
x→∞ [(A + B)x + C + D]A+B (A + B)A+B

gives the proof of the (9).

2.2 A limit for the k- gamma function


Theorem 2.2 For all a, b > 0; x, k > 0 on has

k  Γ (bx + k)  x1
a−b
k
b
bk a−b
k
lim b−a = a (k · e) k . (16)
x→∞ x k Γk (ax + k) ak
Proof.- Since,
x
Γk (x) = k k −1 Γ( )
x

k
we have
1
 ax+k a  x1
Γk (ax + k) x = k k −1 Γ x + 1
k
1
 ax  ak  1  1  x1
a
−1
= k (2πa · k x)
k x 1+ +O 2 (17)
ke 12ak −1 x x

1
 bx+k b  x1
Γk (bx + k) x = k k −1 Γ x + 1
k
1
 bx  kb  1  1  x1
= k k (2πb · k −1 x) x
b
1+ + O (18)
ke 12bk −1 x x2
From (17) and (9) one obtains

   x1
1
 Γ (bx + k)  x1  b  x1  b  kb  ke  ak b−a 1 + 12k−1 1
bx
+ O x2
k
= x k ·   x1 (19)
Γk (ax + k) a ke a
1 + 12k−1 ax + O x12
1

Clearly
 1  1  x1
1+ +O 2 −→ 1 as x → ∞,
12Ax x
A limit for the k-Gamma and k-Beta function 1617

and  b  x1
−→ 1 for x → ∞.
a
Therefore, from (19) one can deduce the following

k  Γ (bx + k)  x1
a−b
k
b
bk a−b
k
lim b−a = a (k · e) k .
x→∞ x k Γk (ax + k) ak
The proof is completed.

References
[1] G. Boros and V. Moll. Irresistible Integrals. Cammbridge University Press,
New York, 1st edition, 2004

[2] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhnik. Table of Integrals, Series, and Prod-


ucts. Edited by A. Jeffrey and D. Zwillinger. Academic Press, New York,
6th edition, 2000.

[3] R.Diaza and E. Pariglan, On hypergeometric function and k-pochemer


symbols, divulgaciones matematicas, Vol. 15 No. 2. (2007). PP 179-192.

[4] E. T. Whitacker, G. N. Watson, A course of modern Analysis, Cambridge,


Univ. Press 1952.

Received: November, 2009

You might also like