Sonata Torso
Sonata Torso
Sonata Torso
In 1911, Enescu began work on what would have been his third violin sonata
but abandoned the piece after completing a lengthy first movement. Though he
made a fair copy of the score and dated it, the movement was published only
after Enescu's death, with the appellation "Torso" affixed as in indication of its
fragmentary nature. The sonata movement is actually one of a number of
unfinished or lost works from what seems to have been a period of indecision
and stylistic uncertainty for Enescu, and its own ambivalence of style reflects
this plainly. Nevertheless, it points the way to later developments in Enescu's
oeuvre, and is an attractive and accomplished work in its own right.
Enescu was himself a virtuoso violinist and more than passable pianist who first
learned to play (at age four) not from a conservatory violin professor but from a
Roumanian Gypsy violinist, Nicolas Chioru. The rhapsodic and improvisatory
elements of Gypsy violin playing are at once evident in the opening theme, a
dark "song without words" with evocations of cimbalom and exotic "oriental"
harmonies from the piano. The theme is worked out, however, in a traditional,
post-Brahmsian manner, with full, robust writing for the piano and a requisite
big sound and virtuosic technique from the violin. Enescu's treatment of his
ethnic-influenced material is here closer to the manner of Liszt, but there are
moments when the Gypsy theme emerges from its thicket of Romantic
counterpoint and hangs suspended, as it were, in time, while widely spaced,
arpeggiated octaves shimmer in the accompaniment. There is a tender middle
section in which the theme is developed in a more impressionistic style
(reminding us that Enescu was a student of Fauré and Massenet at the Paris
Conservatory from 1894 to 1899). A sense of muted tragedy, of the "long ago"
infuses the movement with a passion that was already characteristic of the
composer, even at this unsettled time in his career. The movement ends on a
unison note from violin and piano, leaving the listener with the definite sense
that the sonata could indeed have gone on.
Media Review
The 3 items from your media list that you will use for this review:
2)The first movement, “Ménétrier”,is the only one written for unaccompanied violin and
contains the most overt reference to Romanian folk music, both by nature of its title
(Gypsy fiddler) and by its rhythmic and modal content. Enescu uses modes and
technical devices to express the character of Romanian folk music rather than direct
quotation of folk melodies and in addition he uses a number of instrument-specific
techniques that allowed him to point to Romanian folk performance without quoting folk
melodies.
By omitting the piano from this movement Enescu evokes the image of the “lautar” or
Gypsy fiddler playing alone and points to the monophonic tradition of Romanian
peasant music.
The rhythm could easily form the basis of a folk melody, but Enescu alters it in a way
that is more consistent with Western techniques.
The conclusion
After reading about these two masterworks of Enescu, everything connected to his
music seems or very complex or very simple and ‘rudimentary’’ as folk music, despite
this so called folk music being complex because all of the external influences as Turkey
and Bulgaria and of of course the modal aspect of them. Almost everything that I find is
more directed to the violin itself but in order to achieve my goal which is perform one of
his works I need to search some information about his writing for piano or even better
something focused on the piano part of this sonatas being sometimes technically more
exigent than the violin part. I’m happy with the information that I collected but the
search is not over. I will look for some information about the piano parts among a
‘collection’ of modes used by them to be able to achieve the best result with the
melodies of Enescu, being them his “best method of communication”.