CH - 2.1 Concept of Proverty and Various Estimation Committee
CH - 2.1 Concept of Proverty and Various Estimation Committee
CH - 2.1 Concept of Proverty and Various Estimation Committee
Audio/Video Issue - If audio/video struck during class then refresh page with CTRL+SHIFT+R
Recoded Session - If electricity/Internet outage occurs then worry not, class video recording
will be available in your Dashboard.
Take a Pen and Notebook for Writing Important Points or Answering Questions.
Whatever we will Discuss Today will be Uploaded in the Form of PDF, so download it keep it
with yourself for revision purpose.
You can Ask your doubt during class though Live chat or Note it down for Discussion on it
during doubt clearing session.
RBI GRADE B PHASE – II
In India Poverty Line has been defined in terms of Food availability.
Poverty Line in India indicates the income level which is just sufficient to buy the basic
minimum quantity of food required.
Q-2. Which among the following is the method to estimate the poverty
line in India?
(A) Investment method
(B) Capital method
(C) Human method
(D) Income method
This was first crated by planning commission to determine desirable minimum level of
expenditure required to make a living.
It excluded Health and educational expenditure on assuming that it is provided by state.
‘Average calorie requirements‘ were estimated, separately for the all India rural and urban
areas on the recommendation of Nutrition Expert Group. This resulted in different ‘Poverty line
basket’ for urban and rural areas.
Now these calorie requirements needs some ‘monetary value’ which can be determined by
ascertaining ‘quantity’ of consumption and ‘prices/value’ of that quantity.
It was estimated that, on an average, consumer expenditure (food and non-food) of Rs.49.09
per capita per month was associated with a calorie intake of 2400 per capita per day in rural
areas and Rs.56.64 per capita per month with a calorie intake of 2100 per day in urban areas.
This ‘Monthly Per Capita Expenditure’ was termed as poverty line. This poverty line was
used for upcoming years after adjusting for rise in prices.
Expert group 1993 (Lakdawala)
This Committee was formed in 1989 which submitted its report in 1993 and Used Until 2004-
05.
This panel didn’t redefine poverty line and retained mechanism defined by Algah expert
group.
Instead it disaggregated ‘All India poverty line’ to ‘State specific Poverty Line’ for base year
1973-74.
For latter periods these ‘Rural and Urban Poverty lines of states’ were updated by taking into
account
a) Consumer Price Index- Agricultural Labor for ‘Rural state specific poverty line and
b) CPI - Industrial workers for Urban state specific poverty line.
The fallout of the Lakdawala formula was that number of people below the poverty line got
almost double. The number of people below the poverty line was 16 per cent of the population
in 1993-94. Under the Lakdawala calculation, it became 36.3 per cent.
Expert Group 2005 (Tendulkar)
Recognizing that the Rural Poverty line was too low, in 2005 the Planning commission
appointed another committee under the chairmanship of Suresh Tendulkar. The Committee
submitted the report in 2009.
Tendulkar group changed ‘reference period’ to past one year for 5 nonfood items viz.,
clothing, footwear, durable goods, education and institutional medical expenses.
1st point under Algah committee mentions that it adopted separate PLB for Urban and
rural areas. But Tendulkar committee ended this practice by using a uniform basket (for both
rural and urban).
Poverty line was in form of ‘Rs per capita per month’. 816.0 - Rural 1000.0 - Urban
Expert Group 2005 (Rangrajan)
It was formed under the chairmanship of Rangarajan and submitted its report in June 2014.
It reverted to old system of separate poverty line baskets for Rural and urban areas, which was unified by
Tendulkar group.
Instead of ‘Mixed reference Period’ it recommended ‘Modified Mixed reference period’ in which reference
periods for different items were taken as –
365-days for clothing, footwear, education, institutional medical care, and durable goods,
7-days for edible oil, egg, fish and meat, vegetables, fruits, spices, beverages, refreshments, processed food,
pan, tobacco and intoxicants, and
30-days for the remaining food items, fuel and light, miscellaneous goods and services including non-
institutional medical; rents and taxes.
It preferred to use ‘Monthly expenditure of Household of five’ for the poverty line purpose which came out to
be Rs 4860 in rural areas and Rs. 7035 in urban areas.
It argued that considering expenditure of household is more appropriate than that of individuals. Living together
brings down expenditure and as expenses such as house rent, electricity etc. gets divided into 5 members.
Tendulkar vs. Rangarajan
Committees Tendulkar C.Rangarajan
Set up by Planning commission Planning commission
Set up in 2005 2012, May
Submitted report 2009 2014, July
Poverty estimation method Monthly per CAPITA Expenditure. Monthly Expenditure of family of five.
The discussion about Lakdawala Formula, Suresh Tendulkar Committee and Rangarajan
Committee make it clear that defining a poverty line in India has been a controversial issue
since 1970s.
The latest poverty line defined was by Rangarajan Formula. However, this report also did
not assuage the critics. The new NDA Government turned down this report also.
To define the poverty line, The NDA Government had constituted a 14-member task force
under NITI Aayog’s vice-chairman Arvind Panagariya to come out with recommendations for a
realistic poverty line. After one and half years work, this task force also failed to reach a
consensus on poverty line
After one and half years work, this task force also failed to reach a consensus on poverty
line. In September 2016, it suggested to the government that another panel of specialists
should be asked to do this job {if defining poverty line}.
PRACTICE QUESTIONS
Q - 4. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct regarding the recommendations
of the Tendulkar and Rangarajan Committee formed for the estimation of poverty in
India?
A. The focus areas of the Rangarajan committee is wide as it includes not only the
expenditure on food, clothing, health and education but also other expenditures like
transport, rent, non-food items that meet the nutritional requirements etc.
B. The poverty estimation method of the Tendulkar Committee is ‘Per Capita Expenditure
Monthly’ and that of the Rangarajan Committee is ‘Monthly Expenditure of Family of
Five’
C. As per the estimation of the Rangarajan Committee, the number of poor increased in
comparison to the Tendulkar Committee’s estimation.
D. None of the above
E. All the above