G20 High-Level Principles On Financial Consumer Protection: October 2011
G20 High-Level Principles On Financial Consumer Protection: October 2011
G20 High-Level Principles On Financial Consumer Protection: October 2011
PRINCIPLES ON FINANCIAL
CONSUMER PROTECTION
October 2011
The high-level principles are designed to assist G20 countries and other interested economies to
enhance financial consumer protection. The principles complement and do not substitute any existing
international principles and/or guidelines. In particular they do not address sectoral issues dealt with by
standard setter bodies such as BCBS, IAIS and IOSCO. These (non binding) principles will be applicable
across all financial services sectors.
The OECD coordinating work on the principles was mainly channelled through the Task Force on
Financial Consumer Protection of the Committee on Financial Markets which is open to all G20 and FSB
members, and other relevant international organisations and standard setter bodies. Inputs on financial
education issues were provided through the OECD International Network on Financial Education (INFE)
which comprises representatives from institutions from 90 economies, including all G20 countries.
The Task Force held three physical meetings in April, June and September. But several rounds of
written consultations have also been organised on different versions of the draft principles.
These consultations have included not only the members of the Task Force but also the members of a
FSB consultative group, four OECD Committees, relevant international organisations, standard setter
bodies and networks and consumer and industry associations.
A sixth version of the draft principles was circulated for public consultation until 31 August 2011.
The consultation allowed numerous major stakeholders (governments, consumer and industry associations,
trade unions and other relevant individual institutions) to provide further comments.
A seventh version was discussed by the Task Force on 14 September when final amendments by the
Task Force were approved and confirmed through a written process. A final ninth version of the draft
Principles was submitted to the Committee on Financial Markets (CMF) and the Financial Stability Board
(FSB).
This document reflects the Final High-level Principles on Financial Consumer Protection which were
endorsed by the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors at their meeting on 14-15 October
2011.
1
This complements the G20 leaders call at the November 2010 Seoul Summit. The G20 leaders asked the FSB to
work in collaboration with the OECD and other international organisations to explore, and report back at
the next summit, options for advancing financial consumer protection through informed choices that
include disclosure; transparency and education; protection from fraud, abuse and errors; along with
recourse and advocacy. This report will concentrate on aspects linked to consumer credit and focus largely
(but not necessarily exclusively) on related financial stability issues.
3
FRAMEWORK
Consumer confidence and trust in a well-functioning market for financial services promotes financial
stability, growth, efficiency and innovation over the long term. Traditional regulatory and supervisory
frameworks adopted by oversight bodies contribute to the protection of consumers – which is often and
increasingly recognised as a major objective of these bodies together with financial stability. However,
and while it already exists in several jurisdictions, additional and/or strengthened dedicated and
proportionate policy action to enhance financial consumer protection is also considered necessary to
address recent and more structural developments.
This renewed policy and regulatory focus on financial consumer protection results inter alia from the
increased transfer of opportunities and risks to individuals and households in various segments of
financial services, as well as the increased complexity of financial products and rapid technological
change, all coming at a time when basic access to financial products and the level of financial literacy
remain low in a number of jurisdictions. Rapid financial market development and innovation, unregulated
or inadequately regulated and/or supervised financial services providers, and misaligned incentives for
financial services providers can increase the risk that consumers face fraud, abuse and misconduct. In
particular, low-income and less experienced consumers often face particular challenges in the market
place.
In light of these issues, financial consumer protection should be reinforced and integrated with other
financial inclusion and financial education policies. This contributes to strengthening financial stability. It
is essential to protect consumers’ rights while also recognising the fact that these rights do come with
consumer responsibilities. This calls for legal recognition of financial consumer protection, oversight
bodies with necessary authority and resources to carry out their mission, fair treatment, proper disclosure,
improved financial education, responsible business conduct by financial services providers and authorised
agents, objective and adequate advice, protection of assets and data including from fraud and abuse,
competitive frameworks, adequate complaints handling and redress mechanisms and policies which
address, when relevant, sectoral and international specificities, technological developments and special
needs of vulnerable groups. This approach complements and builds upon financial regulation and
supervision and financial governance.
In order to ensure effective and proportionate financial consumer protection regimes, it is important
that all stakeholders participate in the policy making process.
The principles are addressed to G20 members and other interested economies and are designed to
assist the efforts to enhance financial consumer protection. They are voluntary principles, designed to
complement, not substitute for, existing international financial principles or guidelines. In particular, they
do not address sector specific issues dealt with by the relevant international organisations and the
financial standard setters (such as BCBS, IAIS and IOSCO). Different kinds of transactions present
different risk profiles. The principles may need to be adapted to specific national and sectoral contexts and
should be reviewed periodically by relevant international bodies.2 All G20 members and other interested
economies should assess their national frameworks for financial consumer protection in the light of these
principles and promote international co-operation to support the strengthening of financial consumer
protection in line with, and building upon, the principles.
2
This could, in particular, include voluntary peer reviews by OECD, FSB, World Bank and standard setting bodies
such as BCBS, IAIS and IOSCO.
4
PRINCIPLES
Financial consumer protection should be an integral part of the legal, regulatory and supervisory
framework, and should reflect the diversity of national circumstances and global market and regulatory
developments within the financial sector.
Regulation should reflect and be proportionate to the characteristics, type, and variety of the financial
products and consumers, their rights and responsibilities and be responsive to new products, designs,
technologies and delivery mechanisms.3 Strong and effective legal and judicial or supervisory mechanisms
should exist to protect consumers from and sanction against financial frauds, abuses and errors.
Financial services providers and authorised agents4 should be appropriately regulated and/or
supervised, with account taken of relevant service and sector specific approaches.
There should be oversight bodies (dedicated or not) explicitly responsible for financial consumer
protection, with the necessary authority to fulfil their mandates. They require clear and objectively defined
responsibilities and appropriate governance; operational independence; accountability for their activities;
adequate powers; resources and capabilities; defined and transparent enforcement framework and clear and
consistent regulatory processes. Oversight bodies should observe high professional standards, including
appropriate standards of confidentiality of consumer and proprietary information and the avoidance of
conflicts of interest.
Co-operation with other financial services oversight authorities and between authorities or
departments in charge of sectoral issues should be promoted. A level playing field across financial services
should be encouraged as appropriate. International co-operation between oversight bodies should also be
encouraged, while specific attention should be considered for consumer protection issues arising from
international transactions and cross-border marketing and sales.
All financial consumers should be treated equitably, honestly and fairly at all stages of their
relationship with financial service providers. Treating consumers fairly should be an integral part of the
good governance and corporate culture of all financial services providers and authorised agents. Special
attention should be dedicated to the needs of vulnerable groups.
3
Where relevant, appropriate mechanisms should be developed to address new delivery channels for financial
services, including through mobile, electronic and branchless distribution of financial services, while
preserving their potential benefits for consumers.
4
Authorised agents are understood to mean third parties acting for the financial services provider or in an
independent capacity. They include any agents (tied and independent agents) brokers, advisors and
intermediaries, etc.
5
4. Disclosure and Transparency
Financial services providers and authorised agents should provide consumers with key information
that informs the consumer of the fundamental benefits, risks and terms of the product. They should also
provide information on conflicts of interest associated with the authorised agent through which the product
is sold.5
In particular, information should be provided on material aspects of the financial product. Appropriate
information should be provided at all stages of the relationship with the customer. All financial
promotional material should be accurate, honest, understandable and not misleading. Standardised pre-
contractual disclosure practices (e.g. forms) should be adopted where applicable and possible to allow
comparisons between products and services of the same nature. Specific disclosure mechanisms, including
possible warnings, should be developed to provide information commensurate with complex and risky
products and services. Where possible consumer research should be conducted to help determine and
improve the effectiveness of disclosure requirements.
The provision of advice should be as objective as possible and should in general be based on the
consumer’s profile considering the complexity of the product, the risks associated with it as well as the
customer’s financial objectives, knowledge, capabilities and experience.
Consumers should be made aware of the importance of providing financial services providers with
relevant, accurate and available information.
Financial education and awareness should be promoted by all relevant stakeholders and clear
information on consumer protection, rights and responsibilities should be easily accessible by consumers.
Appropriate mechanisms should be developed to help existing and future consumers develop the
knowledge, skills and confidence to appropriately understand risks, including financial risks and
opportunities, make informed choices, know where to go for assistance, and take effective action to
improve their own financial well-being.
The provision of broad based financial education and information to deepen consumer financial
knowledge and capability should be promoted, especially for vulnerable groups.
Taking into account national circumstances, financial education and awareness should be encouraged
as part of a wider financial consumer protection and education strategy, be delivered through diverse and
appropriate channels, and should begin at an early age and be accessible for all life stages. Specific
programmes and approaches related to financial education should be targeted for vulnerable groups of
financial consumers.
All relevant stakeholders should be encouraged to implement the international principles and
guidelines on financial education developed by the OECD International Network on Financial Education
(INFE). Further national and international comparable information on financial education and awareness
should be compiled by national institutions and relevant international organisations in order to assess and
enhance the effectiveness of approaches to financial education.
5
Financial services providers and authorised agents should provide clear, concise, accurate, reliable, comparable,
easily accessible, and timely written and oral information on the financial products and services being
offered, particularly on key features of the products and (where relevant) on possible alternative services or
products, including simpler ones, they provide. In principle, information should include prices, costs,
penalties, surrender charges, risks and termination modalities.
6
6. Responsible Business Conduct of Financial Services Providers and Authorised Agents
Financial services providers and authorised agents should have as an objective, to work in the best
interest of their customers and be responsible for upholding financial consumer protection. Financial
services providers should also be responsible and accountable for the actions of their authorised agents.
Depending on the nature of the transaction and based on information primarily provided by customers
financial services providers should assess the related financial capabilities, situation and needs of their
customers before agreeing to provide them with a product, advice or service. Staff (especially those who
interact directly with customers) should be properly trained and qualified. Where the potential for conflicts
of interest arise, financial services providers and authorised agents should endeavour to avoid such
conflicts. When such conflicts cannot be avoided, financial services providers and authorised agents should
ensure proper disclosure, have in place internal mechanisms to manage such conflicts, or decline to provide
the product, advice or service.
The remuneration structure for staff of both financial services providers and authorised agents should
be designed to encourage responsible business conduct, fair treatment of consumers and to avoid conflicts
of interest. The remuneration structure should be disclosed to customers where appropriate, such as when
potential conflicts of interest cannot be managed or avoided.
Relevant information, control and protection mechanisms should appropriately and with a high degree
of certainty protect consumers’ deposits, savings, and other similar financial assets, including against
fraud, misappropriation or other misuses.
Consumers’ financial and personal information should be protected through appropriate control and
protection mechanisms. These mechanisms should define the purposes for which the data may be
collected, processed, held, used and disclosed (especially to third parties). The mechanisms should also
acknowledge the rights of consumers to be informed about data-sharing, to access data and to obtain the
prompt correction and/or deletion of inaccurate, or unlawfully collected or processed data.
Jurisdictions should ensure that consumers have access to adequate complaints handling and redress
mechanisms that are accessible, affordable, independent, fair, accountable, timely and efficient. Such
mechanisms should not impose unreasonable cost, delays or burdens on consumers. In accordance with the
above, financial services providers and authorised agents should have in place mechanisms for complaint
handling and redress. Recourse to an independent redress process should be available to address
complaints that are not efficiently resolved via the financial services providers and authorised agents
internal dispute resolution mechanisms. At a minimum, aggregate information with respect to complaints
and their resolutions should be made public.
10. Competition
Nationally and internationally competitive markets should be promoted in order to provide consumers
with greater choice amongst financial services and create competitive pressure on providers to offer
competitive products, enhance innovation and maintain high service quality. Consumers should be able to
search, compare and, where appropriate, switch between products and providers easily and at reasonable
and disclosed costs .