Ultra-Wideband RCS Reduction and Gain Enhancement of Patterned-Surface-Based Aperture Coupling Patch Antenna With Optimized Arrangement Method
Ultra-Wideband RCS Reduction and Gain Enhancement of Patterned-Surface-Based Aperture Coupling Patch Antenna With Optimized Arrangement Method
enhancement of patterned-surface-based
aperture coupling patch antenna with
optimized arrangement method
Cite as: AIP Advances 9, 075103 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5093216
Submitted: 18 February 2019 . Accepted: 24 June 2019 . Published Online: 02 July 2019
Performance analysis of different influencing factors on film cooling and the internal
relations with vortex structures
AIP Advances 9, 070701 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5110726
© 2019 Author(s).
AIP Advances ARTICLE scitation.org/journal/adv
AFFILIATIONS
1
College of Electronic Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
2
Information and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710077, China
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
ABSTRACT
A patterned-surface-based aperture coupling patch antenna (ACPA) with ultra-wideband radar cross section reduction (RCSR) and gain
enhancement is presented in this paper. Due to the air-filled gap structure of the ACPA, an air spacer is introduced to design double-layer
patterned surface (PS), which broadens the RCSR bandwidth of ACPA. Moreover, to obtain better gain of antenna, the arrangement of PS
is optimized based on its current distributions. Experimental results show that impedance matching of PS-based ACPA is preserved well
and operation band is broadened slightly from 8.0 to 11.3 GHz. The boresight gain is enhanced from 7.5 to 11.5 GHz, with a peak gain
enhancement of 4.1 dB at 9.7 GHz. Meanwhile, the PS-based ACPA possesses the ability of specular RCSR over the band 3.0-20.0 GHz for
both polarizations. The 10-dB RCS reduction of the antenna is achieved almost from 5.5 to 17.0 GHz for normal incidence.
© 2019 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5093216
FIG. 1. Schematic geometries of the two AMC units: (a) AMC1; (b) AMC2. Design FIG. 3. Schematic geometry of broadband ACPA. Design parameters of the ACPA
parameters of the units are P=9.0, t1=3.0, t2=3.0, L1=2.8, L2=3.4, L3=8.7, L4=1.2, are Lf1=40.4, Lf2=5.15, Wf=1.2, Lg1=7.2, Wg1=2.6, Wg2=1.0, Lp1=4.0, Wp1=2.5,
L5=1.6, L6=5.5, units: mm. Lp2=8.2, Wp2=7.5, h1=3.0, h2=3.0, h3=0.508, La=90.0, units: mm.
FIG. 4. Schematic geometries of (a) the primary PS loaded antenna; (b) the
improved stage#1 antenna; (c) the improved stage#2 antenna.
FIG. 7. Current distributions of (a) primary PS loaded antenna and (b) improved
FIG. 5. The (a) |S11 | and (b) boresight gain of the antennas. stage#1 antenna at 9.5 GHz.
FIG. 10. Specular RCSR of improved stage#2 antenna for different incident angles
FIG. 9. Radiation patterns of the antennas at 9.1GHz: (a) E-plane; (b) H-plane. under (a) x(TE)- and (b) y(TM)-polarizations.
indicate that ultra-wideband RCSR of the PS-based antenna is patterns of the two antennas at 9.5 GHz are presented in Fig. 13.
obtained in wide spatial ranges. The difference exists between the simulated and measured results.
The discrepancy may be caused by fabrication error, assembly error
III. FABRICATION AND MEASUREMENT and measurement environment.
Samples of the primary and improved antennas are manu- To verify the RCSR performance, the two sample antennas
factured using PCB technology, shown in Fig. 11. Four Nylon were match-loaded and vertically placed on the test platform. Two
columns are utilized to support the whole structure. A vector net- 1-18GHz horn antennas were used. Both the two horn antennas
work analyzer (VNA) Agilent N5230C is utilized to measure the were connected to the VNA. Besides, the time-domain gating of the
|S11 |, and the radiation performances are measured in an ane- VNA was used to only filter the desired reflection signals. The sim-
choic chamber. The measurement circumstance is also presented in ulated and measured RCSR for horizontal (y or TM polarization in
Fig. 11. The measured and the simulated |S11 | of the primary and simulation) and vertical (x or TE polarization in simulation) polar-
the improved antennas are plotted in Fig. 12(a). Good impedance izations are shown in Fig. 14. The RCS of the improved antenna in
matching is obtained. The measured operation band with |S11 |<−10 the band 3.0-18.0 GHz is remarkably reduced for both polarizations,
dB is 7.9-11.0 GHz for the primary antenna and 8.0-11.3 GHz for and the peak RCSR is 34.3 dB. The 10-dB RCSR band is 5.5-17.0
the improved one. Fig. 12(b) presents the boresight gain of the two GHz, indicating a 102.2% relative bandwidth.
antennas. The improved antenna possesses gain enhancement in
the band 7.5-11.5 GHz, which includes the whole operation band.
The peak gain enhancement is 4.1 dB at 9.7 GHz. The radiation
FIG. 12. Simulated and measured (a) |S11 | and (b) boresight gain of primary and FIG. 13. Simulated and measured radiation patterns at 9.5 GHz of the primary and
improved antennas. the improved antennas: (a) E-plane; (b) H-plane.
3
X. Wan, W. X. Jiang, H. F. Ma, and T. J. Cui, “A broadband transformation−
optics metasurface lens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 151601 (2014).
4
M. U. Afzal and K. P. Esselle, “A low-profile printed planar phase correcting
surface to improve directive radiation characteristics of electromagnetic band gap
resonator antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 64(1), 276 (2016).
5
W. G. Chen, C. A. Balanis, and C. R. Birtcher, “Checkerboard EBG surfaces for
wideband radar cross section reduction,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 63(6),
2636 (2015).
6
S. H. Esmaeli and S. H. Sedighy, “Wideband radar cross-section reduction by
AMC,” Electron Lett. 52(1), 70 (2016).
7
Y. T. Jia, Y. Liu, Y. J. Guo, K. Li, and S. X. Gong, “Broadband polarization rotation
reflective surfaces and their applications to RCS reduction,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag. 64(1), 179 (2016).
8
S. Liu, T. J. Cui, Q. Xu, D. Bao et al., “Anisotropic coding metamaterials and their
powerful manipulation of differently polarized terahertz waves,” Light: Sci. Appl.
FIG. 14. Simulated and measured RCSR of the primary and the improved 5, e16076 (2016).
antennas for both polarizations. 9
H. Q. Zhai, C. H. Zhan, Z. H. Li, and C. H. Liang, “A triple-band ultrathin
metamaterial absorber with wide-angle and polarization stability,” IEEE Antennas
Wireless Propag. Lett. 14, 241 (2015).
IV. CONCLUSION 10
M. Paquay, J. C. Iriarte, I. Ederra, R. Gonzalo, and P. D. Maagt, “Thin
AMC structure for radar cross-section reduction,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
A PS-based ACPA antenna with ultra-wideband RCSR and
55(12), 3630 (2007).
gain enhancement is proposed and validated experimentally. When 11
M. Mighani and G. Dadashzadeh, “Broadband RCS reduction using a
the PS is applied to ACPA, an improved loading method of PS is novel double layer chessboard AMC surface,” Electron Lett. 52(14), 1253
utilized to address the issue that radiation properties cannot be pre- (2016).
12
served well in wide frequency ranges. Better radiation performance Y. Zhao, X. Y. Cao, J. Gao, and W. Q. Li, “Broadband radar absorbing material
is obtained, which is the result of the radiation patch combined with based on orthogonal arrangement of CSRR etched artificial magnetic conductor,”
the PS. The experimental results show that the boresight gain of the Microw. and Optical Techn. Lett. 56(1), 158 (2014).
13
antenna is enhanced in the whole operation band and the RCS is J. C. I. Galarregui, A. T. Pereda, J. L. M. D. Falcón, I. Ederra, R. Gonzalo, and
P. D. Maagt, “Broadband radar cross-section reduction using AMC technology,”
reduced in a wide frequency range. This novel design provides a
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61(12), 6136 (2013).
good approach to solve the confliction between the radiation and 14
Y. J. Zheng, X. Y. Cao, J. Gao, H. H. Yang, Y. L. Zhou, and S. M. Wang,
the scattering properties of broadband antenna. “Shared aperture metasurface with ultra-wideband and wide-angle low-scattering
performance,” Optical Materials Express 7(8), 2706 (2017).
15
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Y. Liu, Y. W. Hao, K. Li, and S. X. Gong, “Radar cross section reduction
of a microstrip antenna based on polarization conversion metamaterial,” IEEE
Authors thank the supports from the National Natural Science Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett. 15, 80 (2016).
Foundation of China under Grant (61271100, 61471389, 61501494, 16
Y. Liu, Y. W. Hao, K. Li, and S. X. Gong, “Wideband and polarization-
61571448 and 61671464). They also thank the reviewers for their independent radar cross section reduction using holographic metasurface,” IEEE
valuable comments. Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett. 15, 1028 (2016).
17
Y. Liu, K. Li, Y. T. Jia, Y. W. Hao, S. X. Gong, and Y. J. Guo, “Wideband RCS
reduction of a slot array antenna using polarization conversion metasurfaces,”
REFERENCES
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 64(1), 326 (2016).
1 18
H. B. Wang and Y. J. Cheng, “Frequency selective surface with miniaturized Y. Zhao, X. Y. Cao, J. Gao, X. Yao, T. Liu, W. Q. Li, and S. J. Li, “Broadband low-
elements based on quarter-mode substrate integrated waveguide cavity with two RCS metasurface and its application on antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
poles,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 64(3), 914 (2016). 64(7), 2954 (2016).
2 19
D. J. Gregoire, C. R. White, and J. S. Colburn, “Wideband artificial magnetic Z. J. Han, W. Song, X. Q. Sheng et al., “Gain enhancement and RCS reduction
conductors loaded with non-foster negative inductors,” IEEE Antennas Wireless for patch antenna by using polarization-dependent EBG surface,” IEEE Antennas
Propag. Lett. 10, 1586 (2011). Wireless Propag. Lett. 16, 1631 (2017).