Comparative Drama
Comparative Drama
Comparative Drama
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Comparative Drama is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Comparative
Drama.
http://www.jstor.org
75
undersiege.Kanechoosesthemomentwhenthesoldiermarkshisterri-
tory(urinating inthehotelroominfront ofIan) to reorganize thespace
and thestructure of herplaywitha "blindinglightand a hugeexplo-
sion"followedbya blackoutwhen"a morter bomb"blastsaparttheplays
hotelsetting(39). In earlierdrafts, Kanehad Ian imaginethesoldierun-
tilsheradically decidedto"planta bombandjustblowthewholefucking
thingup.... [she] loved the idea of that... just blowingup the set."6
Blasted'sfirsthalflurestheaudienceintoa falsesense of naturalistic
security,eclipsedbehindtheinvisible fourth wall,thatanesthetic, insulat-
ingconspiracy Brecht foundso dangerous tosocialengagement. Through
herArtaudiansleights ofhandthattrespasson boththecharacters' and
theaudiencescomfort the
zones, play is relentlessin demolishing what
Kanerefers toas "thesafety offamiliarform."7 In herself-described quest
to"dothingsthathadn'tbeendone,to inventnewforms[and]findnew
modes of representation,"8 Kane situatesher workalongsidethatof
"Beckett, Barker, Pinter,[and]Bond"who"allhavebeencriticized notso
muchforthecontent oftheirwork, butbecausetheyusenon-naturalistic
formsthateludesimplistic As such,Kanes use ofstage
interpretation".9
space is farfrom gratuitous, in
especially relation to issuesofidentity.
An indicationofhowdeeplywe protectourselvesthroughgeogra-
phyis thevoracity oftheplaysreception. Justas itprovidesthetermsin
whichthe characters experienceangstand fragmentation, space (and
Kanesruthless rejection ofconventional stagemapping) became, forre-
the
viewers, play s too audacious move. In the onlybook-length studyto
datedevotedsolelyto Kanes plays,GrahamSaundersidentifies Kanes
"rejection, or at least manipulation, of the conventions of realism [as]
thekeydistinguishing feature ofthedramaticstrategy employed" in her
work.10 Kane indelicately balancestwoontologiesofstagespace;one is
grounded in the flexibilityofShakespearean and medievaldramawhile
theotherinvokesthestifling overdetermination ofkitchen-sink realism.
Surprisingly, itis her defiance ofthe rules of realism, especially terms
in
of space,thatinfuriated criticsmorethanherplays shockingimages.
Indeed,it is hardto finda reviewor criticalappraisalof theplaythat
does notitselfresortto spatiallanguageand metaphors. Some areposi-
tivecomments, as forinstanceRichardEyreandNicholasWright s claim
thatKane"rewrote thetheatricalmap" or James Macdonald s praiseof
NOTES
1 For instance,the murderof thewhite
patriarchat theend of act 1 of CarylChurchill's
influentialplay Cloud 9 (1979) does not lead the survivingcharactersto a stateof reliefand
freedom butincreaseddisorientation, andbitter
self-recrimination, nostalgia.Morerecently,Patrick
Marber'sCloser (1997) stagesan entirescene in cyberspace, a siteseeminglyinfusedwiththe
potentialofdemocratic
liberating negotiationofidentities
anderoticpractices. Yet,besidestrading
in theusual misogyny and patriarchalcontradiction,theirinteractionin a chatroomconfersno
lastingsatisfactionor coherence.Rather,it becomesanotheremblemof alienation,no help in
suturingthefractured subject,anathemato an antioppressive politic.Whileitpromisesidentity
and desireas fluid,mobile,and irreducibleto binarycategories,thisnewworlddisordercannot
evadethelogicofOthernessthatgovernshowspaceis organizedand howtheselfis understood.
2 Sarah Kane, Sarah Kane:
CompletePlays (London: Methuen,2001), 3. All subsequent
quotationsare fromthisedition.
3 In his
essay"Of OtherSpaces,"trans.JayMiskowiec,Diacritics,16,no. 1 (spring1986):
22-27,MichelFoucaultchoosesthetheateras hisprimary exampleto illustratetheheterotopia's
spatialjuxtapositionof irreconcilable
places.
4AleksSierz,In-Yer-FaceTheater:BritishTheater
Today(London:Faberand Faber,2001),
99.
5 Una Chaudhuri,
StagingPlace: The GeographyofModernDrama (Ann Arbor:Univer-
sityofMichiganPress,1995),6.
6Sierz,102.
8Ibid.,102.
9Heidi on
Stephensonand NatashaLangridge,
eds.,Rageand Reason:WomenPlaywrights
(London:Methuen,1997),130.
Playwriting
10GrahamSaunders,"Love Me or Kill Me": Sarah Kane and the Theatreof Extremes
(Manchester:ManchesterUniversity Press,2002),9. SinceSaundersdoes sucha finejob analyz-
ing Kane's"non-realism"
as well as Blasted'sexplicitallusionsto theworkof playwrights like
Ibsenand Chekhov(8-12; 41-45), I willnotspendtimein myargumentdoingso.
11Ibid.,8. Saunderseven
speaksof David Greig'sfearof Kane'sworkundergoinga "colo-
nizingcriticalprocess"(xi) as scholarscompeteto map thesymbolicsignificanceof theplays.
12Chaudhuri,55.
13Sierz,96.
16Ibid.,289,330.
17Ibid.,331.
18Ibid.,331.
23Sierz,95-6.
24Chaudhuri.il.
25 inAmericandrama,suchspacesproliferate.
Especially Temporary embody
spacesfrequently
thesocial marginalization fromhotelsin Barry'sHotel Universe
and/oralienationofcharacters,
and Williams'sNightof theIguana,to boardinghousesin Luce'sThe Womenand Ferber'sStage
Door, to bars in RobertPatrick'sKennedy'sChildren,
WilliamSaroyan'sThe Timeof YourLife,
and O'Neill'sAnna Christieand TheIcemanCometh.
26Chaudhuri,244.
33JohnRussell
Taylor,"BritishDramatists:The New Arrivals:The Dark Fantastic,Plays
and Players18,no. 5 (1970-71): 24-27.
34Sierz,94-95.
35Absentfromthelistof atrocities
thoughis Iarisrape of Cate,whichhappensduringa
blackout.Kane'sdecisionnot to representsuch an act onstage,particularly
withina play de-
signedto shockitsaudiences,pointsperhapsto theculture's
inurednumbness(or evenpotential
44
Stephensonand Langridge,134.
45Hercommentalso works
againstPeterBuse'spsychoanalytic analysisofthefitsas partof
Cate'spsychologicalmechanicsofrepression and disavowal.Whilethesefitsareconsistentwith
Cate'songoingresistanceto and evasionof Ian'sadvances,it is importantnot to see themas
emptysignifiersin thetext.Rather,Cate describesa journeyto an ulterior,
potentially redemp-
tivespace.Buse understandstheworkand thedynamicsoftheplaywithina limitingFreudian
contextthatenvisionstheirgoalas workingthroughthetrauma.PartofBuse'sdifficulty withhis
readingis howslipperyBlastedis whenone looksfortheoverdetermined psychology ofrealism.
Kane eschewssuch patternsof psychology and theconceptof traumaas a treatablecondition
evenas sherejectsin Blastednotonlyartisticand mediamodesofdisavowalbutalso an Aristo-
teliandramaticstructure telosin catharsis.
thatlocatesa definitive
46 9.
Scarry,
4/Sierz,98.
53Charles
Spencer,reviewofBlasted,as performedbytheRoyalCourtTheatre,theJerwood
TheatreDownstairs,London,Daily Telegraph, TheatreRecord,4 May2001,419.