01 MR Lee Eng Lock - Neeconf
01 MR Lee Eng Lock - Neeconf
01 MR Lee Eng Lock - Neeconf
Climate Solutions
Asia Pacific
24 May 2011
The Journey Begins ………….
‹#› Insert Footer
1983—Condenser water flow study
Chiller retrofit energy project - 1.53 years pay back = ROI > 50%
‹#› Insert Footer
‹#› Insert Footer
‹#› Insert Footer
FREE PHASE : One chiller operation status
‹#› Insert Footer
Analyse manufacturing curves vs
real time operating points
Manufacturing curves
Deletion of triple valve of PMP21-202 during 8Mar2002-
16Mar2002
Deletion of 14”
TDV
AHU ENERGY RETROFIT
SUMMARY:
Savings of 140 kW
or 80% on
operating cost
In Manila, Lee started with the easy ones: upgrading the lighting, turning off the
office air conditioning at night, replacing screw-type air compressors with high-
Turn Down the efficiency centrifugal units. Then he rebuilt or tuned up the air-conditioning and
handling system. Ed Ornela, the company's corporate engineering director in the
Energy/Tune Up the Profits Philippines, calculates that the new air compressors cut the annual electric bill by
$580,000; a new chiller and changes in chiller operation saved another $620,000;
and other improvements lopped off $919,000. Amkor/Anan's electricity bill
Only a third of U.S. manufacturers are seriously scrutinizing actually went up, from $7.2 million in 1995 to $8.5 million in 1997, as chip output
doubled. But the power cost per chip, adjusted for chip size, tumbled by 37%.
energy usage, where savings in five areas can move billions
to the bottom line. Examples like these ought to inspire companies that have paid little attention to
their energy bills. A lot of waste, ironically, can be found in some U.S.
semiconductor plants that feed work to companies like Amkor. A chip plant's
Philip Siekman electricity bill can easily hit $2 million a month. That concerns utilities and
governments, particularly in the Pacific Northwest. The Northwest Power
Planning Council, made up of representatives of four of the region's state
governments, sponsored a workshop where Lee Eng Lock showed how to reduce
HVAC power requirements in clean rooms from a current 1.2 kilowatts to two
kilowatts per ton of cooling capacity to what he says is an achievable 0.6 kilowatt
‹#› Insert Footer to 0.7 kilowatt per ton.
Power cost per chip produced, saved
37%.
In terms of $ - savings of more than
US$2 million annually Removal of secondary pumps
• Energy Saving (kWh) per year 60,907,538 kWh (LPG fuel energy)
• Utility bill saving per year USD 1,540,636 per year
• Investment USD 5,000,000
• Simple Payback 3.24 Years
• Simple ROI 30.81 %
ڵEnergy Saving (kWh) per year (Steam energy gain) 43,800,000 kWh LPG saving
ڵEnergy Saving (kWh) per year*(transmission loss 3%) 2,628,000 kWh Electrical saving
ڵInvestment USD25,000,000
Description Ch 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
CHW Set Temp 5.5 5.5 5.5 - 5.5
CHWS T ( degC ) 5.8 5.8 6.3 6.1 5.8
CHWR T ( degC ) 11.2 10.8 11.1 10.9 11.3
dT 5.4 5.0 4.8 4.8 5.5
Savings in kW
35,000
For the week: 15-June-2007 to 21-June 2007 0.6000
0.5900
30,000
0.5800
25,000 0.5700
0.5600
20,000
Ton-hr
0.5500 kW-hr
kW/ton
15,000
0.5753 kW/Ton
0.5758 kW/Ton
0.5840 kW/Ton
0.5830 kW/Ton
0.5688 kW/Ton
0.5670 kW/Ton
0.5745 kW/Ton
0.5400
10,000 0.5300
0.5200
5,000
0.5100
0 0.5000
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu
15-Jun-07 16-Jun-07 17-Jun-07 18-Jun-07 19-Jun-07 20-Jun-07 21-Jun-07 Average
Ton-hr 28,652 20,811 15,133 28,707 28,071 27,379 27,404 25,165
kW-hr 16,483 11,982 8,838 16,736 15,968 15,525 15,744 14,468
kW/ton 0.5753 0.5758 0.5840 0.5830 0.5688 0.5670 0.5745 0.5755
‹#› Insert Footer
System kW/RT SingPost 18~20 Feb 2008
So far, there’s no essential use for HCFCs because the phase-out comes many years into the future. Most people
believe there will be an essential use exemption for HCFC. And if that were true, and the HCFC-123 building air
conditioners retained their competitive advantage for high energy efficiency, then they probably would get that
exemption. So you could keep using 123 until a better refrigerant comes. But here’s the more important question,
why would someone believe that HFC-134a will be in the market longer than HCFC-123?
There is no plan to further accelerate the HCFC phase-out, but there is every intention to accelerate the HFC-134a
phase down. So HFC-134a may be gone from chillers before HCFC-123. Today when you go to buy, and you ask
the question, which refrigerant will last the longest in the market, I don’t think it’s HFC-134a. HFC-1234yf should
work anywhere HFC-134a is working today. Both HCFC-123 and HFC-134a are in regulatory jeopardy, but the
difference is that HCFC-123 gets higher energy efficiency. For large chillers, it’s the top-runner.
HCFC-123 is currently the best in the market. With 134a under phase-out worldwide
for cars, stationary is next. It’s exciting!
Nov2008
Thomas Hartman, P E
The Hartman Company
June 2007,
automatedbuildings.com
Based on electrically driven centrifugal chiller plants in comfort conditioning applications with
42F (5.6C) nominal chilled water supply temperature and open cooling towers sized for 85F
(29.4C) maximum entering condenser water temperature and 20% excess capacity.
Local Climate adjustment for North American climates is +/- 0.05 kW/ton
– Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 - 1860)