Ecuatii Functionale
Ecuatii Functionale
Ecuatii Functionale
Pang-Cheng, Wu
0 Preliminaries 5
0.1 Notations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
0.2 Character . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1 Basic Concepts 7
1.1 What are functional equations ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.2 Assertion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.3 Injectivity and Surjectivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.4 Cauchy’s Functional Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.5 Establishing Inequalities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.6 Exercise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
1.6.1 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
1.6.2 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
1.6.3 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
1.6.4 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2 Cauchy FE 25
2.1 Taiwanese Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.2 Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
2.3 Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.4 Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2.5 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3 Double Counting 35
3.1 Switching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.2 Three variables method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
3.3 Double Counting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
3.4 Exercise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
3
Chapter 0
Preliminaries
0.1 Notations
• N : the set of all positive integers
• N0 : defined by N0 = N ∪ {0}
0.2 Character
5
Chapter 1
Basic Concepts
Solving functional equations is a main part in Olympiad Algebra. We will first introduce
the basic ideas. For example, apply injectivity to reduce the equation. Or establish some
inequalities to find the value of given point. Then, we’re going to solve problems in past
contests. Finally, we’ll learn supplement materials, which are used to bash.
2x − 5y = 8
3x + 9y = −12
2f (1) − 5f (2) = 8
3f (1) + 9f (2) = −12
In fact, when the domain of f is a finite subset A of N, it’s just a system of equations
with variables {f (a)}a∈A . So, it’s nature to consider finding all functions with particular
properties as a generalization. Here is an example,
7
As dealing with systems of equations, we want to choose several suitable equations and
solve. For instance, for f (0), the simplest identity is
2f (0) − 5f (0) = 8
f (x) + xf (1 − x) = x
for all x ∈ R
f (a) + af (1 − a) = a
f (1 − a) + (1 − a) f (a) = 1 − a
a2
Direct to get f (a) = 1−a+a2
. It’s over? No, we should verify our answer. As following:
x2 x (1 − x)2
f (x) + xf (1 − x) = +
1 − x + x2 1 − (1 − x) + (1 − x)2
x2 x − 2x2 + x3
= +
1 − x + x2 1 − x + x2
=x
Remark 1. The question, now, is why we need to check our answer. That’s because, in
most problems, we won’t find all identities in which a given variable appears. The value may
contradicts to other equations.
• If the variables ( f (something) ) in the chosen equation are known, go to the next step.
Otherwise, back to Step 1.
p
Therefore, we can find a function g : N → N defined by g (x) = 3
f (x) (why) Then g
satisfies the following equation
for all x, y ∈ N. If we know the values of g (1) and g (2), it’s easy to show g is the identity
map by mathematical induction. As the previous example suggested, when one encounters
the relation between h (x) , h (y) , h (xy) , h (x + y) for some function h, it’s quite useful to get
h (1) , h (2) by taking the following assertions:
Example 7. (2015 Baltic Way) Find all functions f : R → R satisfying for all reals x, y,
Then, take x = 0, y = 1:
f (0) = 2f (0) + f (f (1))
√
So f (0) = 0. It follows that for a ≥ 0, f (a) = 0 by setting (x, y) = ( a, 0)
Finally, since f (f (b)) = 0 for all b ∈ R (why) , f (c) = −f (−1) c for all negatives c (why)
1.3 Injectivity and Surjectivity
Sometimes, it’s not clear to show, after assertion, what f should be. Perhaps, there are
too many f , we aren’t sure that whether f (a) appears in equations. Therefore, we hope to
reduce the numbers of f . There are two ways: injectivity and surjectivity.
f (something 1) = f (something 2)
becomes useful.
f (f (n)) = f (f (n + 2) + 2) = n
f (f (n)) = f (f (n + 2) + 2) → f (n) = f (n + 2) + 2
Then, by mathematical induction, f (2m) = 1 − 2m for all m ∈ Z Now, given an odd integer
k, write k = 2l + 1. Our goal is to find the value of f (2l + 1). However, note that
It follows that
In the previous remark, we see a standard way for proving injectivity: contradiction
method. Although the following example can be solved by exchanging x, y, we still give a
proof with injectivity.
Example 9. Find all functions f : Z → Z such that
f (x + f (y)) = f (x) + y
for all x, y ∈ Z
In other words, f is injective. As mentioned before, to use the injectivity, it suffices to choose
an equation of the form
f (something 1) = f (something 2)
Indeed, one may assert y = 0 and get
f (x + f (0)) = f (x)
It follows that f (0) = 0. We then see f (f (y)) = y by taking x = 0 in the equation. Plugging
back to the equation,
f (x + y) = f (x) + f (y)
In particular, f (x + 1) = f (x) + f (1), which implies
f (x) = xf (1)
Most of them do not satisfy the original equation, the only possibilities are
Proof. Use the contradiction method, again. Suppose f is not injective, then there are two
elements a, b such that f (a) = f (b). So we have
g (f (a)) = g (f (b)) → a = b
f (g (x) + y) = g (x + f (y))
for all x, y in R
Solution. Since g is injective, we tend to fix LHS. Thus, set y = −g (x) to get
x + f (−g (x)) = c, ∀x ∈ R
This equation, in particular, shows that f is surjective. Now, the original condition tells us
g is also surjective. Let a be a real number with g (a) = 0. Then
f (x + y − a) = x + f (y) − a
Indeed, for every surjective function, we can replace f (something) to an arbitrary number
whenever something can be any number of the codomain.
Sometimes, it’s not obvious that a function is injective because the condition is compli-
cate. However, if we know that the function is surjective, then we can reduce the condition
to a simpler form. Then, maybe it’s possible to show the injectivity.
Example 11. (2002 A1) Find all functions f from reals to reals such that
f (f (x) + y) = 2x + f (f (y) − x)
for all x, y in R
Solution. Since there is already a term ”2x”, which is a surjective function. So if we want
to show f is surjective, we may hope x is ”free”. Therefore, one should choose a suitable y
such that one of the terms f (f (x) + y) and f (f (y) − x) is a constant.
So f is surjective. Now, suppose that a, b are reals such that f (a) = f (b). Then,
Example 12. (2015 Swiss) Find all functions f : R → R such that for arbitrary x, y ∈ R,
P (0, c) → (c + 2) f (0) = c
It follows that f (0) = 0. From here, one can easily find the desired function f is
f (x) = −x, ∀x ∈ R
1.4 Cauchy’s Functional Equation
So far, one may observe that the domains of functional equations are usually ”R”. Thus, I
would like to introduce a result of real functions.
Definition 4. A function f : A → B is called additive if
f (a1 + a2 ) = f (a1 ) + f (a2 )
holds for all a1 , a2 , a1 + a2 ∈ A
We consider the situation that A = B = R. By using induction, it’s easy to check
f (n) = nf (1)
for all n ∈ Z. (ref. example 9) For rationals, we have
p 1 p
f = f (p) = f (1)
q q q
The first equality follows from f (nx) = nf (x), which can be proved by induction, also. Now,
we may expect that f (x) = xf (1) for all x ∈ R. However, it’s false! (why?) Fortunately,
we have a criterion.
Theorem 1. Anyone of following conditions implies an additive f : R → R must be linear.
• f is continuous on some interval
• f is bounded on some interval
• f is monotonic on some interval
Proof. For the first one, notice that if f is continuous at one point, then f is continuous
everywhere. Next, for any real r, choose a sequence of rationals {an }n≥1 converging to that
number. Since f is continuous,
f (rx) = lim f (an x) = lim an f (x) = rf (x)
n→∞ n→∞
For the second one, suppose there is a real r s.t. f (r) 6= rf (1). WLOG f is increasing and
f (r) > rf (1). Choose a rationals q so that ff (1)
(r)
> q > r then
Example 13. Find all functions f : R → R such that for all reals x, y, we have
Solution. The original equation is complicate, especially the term f (xf (y) + yf (x)). To
kick it out, we may hope to have f (0) = 0 (why) This is indeed the case,
implies f (0) = 0. Next, subtract P (x, 0) and P (y, 0) from P (x, y), we have the following
Then, compare
we see that f (−x) = ±f (x) holds for all x. Assume f (a) = f (−a) = 0 for some a
Q (b, −b) → 0 = 2f b2
so b2 = 0. In other words, b = 0. From here, one can conclude that f must be odd. Finally,
add two equations Q (x, y) and Q (x, −y),
f (x + y)2 + f (x − y)2 = 2f x2 + 2f y 2
g (x + y) + g (x − y) = 2g (x) + 2g (y)
2. Notice that 0 ≤ g (x) ≤ 2x2 . Try to prove that g (x) = g (1) x2 holds for all x ∈ R
We return to an application of the theorem.
By using the surjectivity of x2015 , we get f (f (x)) = x and thus, f is bijective. Now,
and then
One should be able to determine the value of a (hope so) Thus, we have
We claim that f is linear: Given any real number x. We have, for any rational number q,
Since q can be arbitrary, f (x2014 ) = f (1) f (x)2014 (why) In particular, the second condition
in the theorem is fulfilled. The conclusion follows.
Example 15. (2017 CSP) Find all functions f : R+ → R such that
x
f (x) − f (x + y) = f f (x + y)
y
P (b, a − b) → f (b) = 0
We have
x
f (x) f y
+1
P (x, y) , P (y, x) → = y
f (y) f x
+1
and thus,
x 1 x
f y
+1 f (x) f (2x) 2
f y
+1
x y
y
= = = y
⇔f f =1
2f x
+2 2f (y) f (y) 2f x
+1 y x
1
f (x) = , ∀x ∈ R+
x
1.5 Establishing Inequalities
Sometimes, it’s not straightforward to find a proof of f (a) = b for some given a, b. Instead,
we try to prove the following inequalities:
f (x + 5) ≤ f (x) + 5
f (x) + 5 ≤ f (x + 5) ≤ f (x) + 5
Because the condition is already an inequality, it’s very straightforward to come up with
such a solution.
f (x) + f (y) ≥ 2f (x + y)
Example 17. (2017 OAO Shortlist) Find all functions f : N → N such that
n
X 1
=1
i=1
fi (n)
n f (n)
X 1 X 1
i
= 1 = i
i=1
f (n) i=1
f (f (n))
From above, we get that f (n) > n − 1 (why). In other words, f (n) ≥ n for all n ∈ N.
Therefore,
n n
X 1 X 1
1= i
≤ =1
i=1
f (n) i=1
n
It follows that f (n) = n must hold for all natural n, which is clearly a solution of the
functional equation.
Exercise. (Socrates) Find all functions f : N → N such that for each positive integer n,
there exists a positive integer k with
k
X
f i (n) = kn
i=1
To establish an inequality, we should take large numbers into consideration. For instance,
Example 18. (2014 Taiwan) Find all increasing functions f : N → N satisfying f (2) = 7,
(x + 1) (y + 1) = xy + x + y + 1
Let g (n) := f (n) + 1, we then have g (mn) = g (m) g (n) holds for all m, n ∈ N. Now,
y 1 1 3y
nx > 2y ⇔ log2 n > ⇔ g (n) = g (nx ) x > g (2y ) x = 2 x
x
This gives the lower-bound of g (n), namely n3 . A similar argument gives g (n) ≤ n3
Note that whenever the codomain of the function is R+ or N, we have a trivial inequality.
Example 19. (2016 Poland) Find all functions f : R+ → R+ such that
2f (f (f (x))) + 5f (f (x)) = f (x) + 6x
holds for all x ∈ R+
Solution. If one does not familiar to recurrence, take a look: https: // en. wikipedia.
org/ wiki/ Recurrence_ relation . Given any x ∈ R. Let ai = f i (x). Then conditions
P (x) , P (f (x)) , · · · becomes
2ai+3 + 5ai+2 = ai+1 + 6ai
for all i ∈ N0 . To get the general formula of ai , we should solve
2x3 + 5x2 − x − 6 = 0
i
The roots are 1, −2, − 32 , ai = b + c (−2)i + d − 32 If b or c is not zero, then ai < 0 for some
integer i (why) This means the sequence {ai }i≥0 is constant. In other words, f (x) = x. Note
that the choice of x can be arbitrary, we conclude the answer to this problem is
f (x) = x, ∀x ∈ R+
In most problems, one needs to establish the recurrence.
Example 20. (Socrates) Determine all functions f : R+ → R+ such that
f (f (x) + y) + f (x + y) = 2x + 2f (y)
holds for all x, y ∈ R+
Solution. We have the following equations:
P (x, f (1)) → f (f (x) + f (1)) + f (x + f (1)) = 2x + 2f (f (1))
P (x, 1) → f (f (x) + 1) + f (x + 1) = 2x + 2f (1)
P (1, x) → f (x + f (1)) + f (x + 1) = 2 + 2f (x)
P (1, f (x)) → f (f (x) + f (1)) + f (1 + f (x)) = 2 + 2f ((x))
So,
f (f (x)) = 2x − f (x) + (f (f (1)) + f (1) − 2)
Denote f (f (1)) + f (1) − 2 by c, then
f (f (x)) = 2x − f (x) + c
A simple induction gives
1 c 1 c
f n (x) = f (x) + 2x + nc − + (−2)n x − f (x) +
3 3 3 3
The remains are easy.
1.6 Exercise
To get a better feeling, I strongly suggest that the readers do lots of functional equations
because we usually come up with a great idea due to our experience.
1.6.1 2014
Problem 1. (Baltic Way) Find all functions f defined on all reals and taking real values
such that
f (f (y)) + f (x − y) = f (xf (y) − x)
Problem 2. (ELMO) Find all triples (f, g, h) of injective functions from the set of real
numbers to itself satisfying
f (f (x)) = (x − 1) f (x) + 2
f (x)2
xf (2f (y) − x) + y 2 f (2x − f (y)) = + f (yf (y))
x
f (f (x)) = f (x)
for all x, y ∈ R
Problem 9. (Turkey) Find all the functions f : R → R such that
1.6.3 2016
Problem 10. (Balkan) Find all injective functions f : R → R such that for every real
number x and every positive integer n,
X n
i (f (x + i + 1) − f (f (x + i))) < 2016
i=1
f a2 − f b2 ≤ (f (a) + b) (a − f (b))
1.6.4 2017
Problem 16. (Belarus) Find all functions f : R+ → R+ satisfying the following equation
f (x + f (xy)) = xf (1 + f (y))
Problem 17. (Greece) Find all functions f, g : R → R such that g (1) = −8 and
Problem 20. (Turkey) Given a real number a, try to find all functions f : R → R so that
for every x, y ∈ R
Chapter 2
Cauchy FE
In chapter one, we have introduced some terminologies. Recall the statement of theorem 1:
For an additive f : R → R, any of the following conditions guarantees that f is linear.
• f is continuous on some interval
• f is bounded on some interval
• f is monotonic on some interval
We’re not contented because additivity and others are strong conditions.
f (x + y) = f (x) f (y)
g (x + y) = g (x) + g (y)
f (x) = ax , ∀x ∈ R
25
Exercise. Find all continuous functions f : R → R so that
f x2 = f (x)2 ≥ 0
for all x, y ∈ R
f (x + y) = f (x) + f (y) + a
Solution. Why we want to transform the function? Because we hope to show that f is
linear by using Theorem 1! Thus, after guessing the answer to the FE, we should apply the
corresponded transformation. In this example, one may guess
f (x) = cx − a, ∀x ∈ R
for some constant c ∈ R are the only functions satisfying the conditions. So, we tend to
define g : R+ → R such that
g (x) = f (x) + a
Then the identity becomes
g (x + y) = g (x) + g (y)
which is trivail?
Another example,
f (x + y + d) = f (x) + f (y)
holds for x, y ∈ R
Solution. This is similar to the previous one. First of all, one need to guess the answer.
Assume that f is linear:
f (x) = ax + b
ax + ay + ad + b = LHS = RHS = ax + ay + 2b ⇔ b = ad
In other words,
f (x) = cx + cd = c (x + d) , ∀x ∈ R
Exercise. Given two real numbers a, b. Find all continuous functions f : R → R such that
f (x + y + a) = f (x) + f (y) + b
Before the next subsection, I would like to summary our previous work. (under a suitable
situation i.e., bounded)
Solution. Notice that if f is a solution, then−f is also satisfies the conditions. So, let’s
assume that f (1) = 1. We’ll calculate f x21+x in two different ways.
1 1 1 1 1 1
f 2
=f −f = − = 2
x +x x x+1 f (x) f (x) + 1 f (x) + f (x)
Example 25. (2008 Korea) Find all additive functions f : R → R such that
1 f (x)
f = 2 , ∀x ∈ R∗
x x
Solution. This one looks very similar to the previous. We still assume f (1) = 1 and
1
calculate the same expression f x2 +x .
(2x + 1) f (x) − x2
1 1 1 f (x) f (x) + 1
f =f −f = 2 − =
2
x +x x x+1 x (x + 1)2 (x2 + x)2
It equals to
f (x2 + x) f (x2 ) + f (x)
=
(x2 + x)2 (x2 + x)2
which is equivalent to
f x2 + x2 = 2xf (x)
Now, it’s not obvious to show f is the identity. So we tend to calculate another expression
2 !
2f x1
1 2 1 2 1
f x+ = f x + 2 + 2 = 2xf (x) − x + 2 + − 2
x x x x
Solution. For any a, b ∈ R, choose a large c > 0 with a + b + 2c, b + 2c > 0, we have
f (a + b + 2c) = f (a + b) + f (2c)
f (x + y) = f (x) + f (y)
By the condition, it’s true for w ∈ (z, z + z 2 ). Suppose it’s true for w ∈ z, z + n2 z 2
Consider w ∈ z + n2 z 2 − , z + n+1 2
2
z . Note that
r r
n+1 2 n+1 2 n+1 2
z+ z ++w < z+ z ++z+ z < 2z + nz 2
2 2 2
Thus, r !
n+1 2
f z+ z + + f (w) = 2f (a)
2
where a ∈ z, z + n2 z 2 . According to the inductive hypothesis,
r !
n+1 2 z++w
f (z + ) + 2f (a) = f z+ z + + 2f
2 2
z++w
As the result, f (z + ) + f (w) = 2f 2
= f (z + + w), as desired.
We have already proved that f (x) + f (y) = f (x + y) for large x, y ∈ R+ . Thus, f (x) = cx
for all large x ∈ R+ . Finally, because f (2x) = 2f (x) , ∀x ∈ R+ , we get f (x) = cx, ∀x ∈ R+
In fact, in these examples, we just extend the ”size” of a particular set. Formally, let
S0 ⊂ S1 ⊂ S2 ⊂ · · · ⊂ Sk = R × R
and it’s easy to extend Si−1 to Si . To illustrate this idea, we’ll solve two problems.
Example 30. (APMO) Find all functions f : R+ → R+ such that
and f (−1) 6= 0.
Double Counting
3.1 Switching
Basically, LHS and RHS, in the equation, must hold the same properties. For instance,
if LHS is an increasing function of x, then RHS is also an increasing function of x. In
particular, if LHS is symmetric w.r.t the variables, then so is RHS. If this is the case, we
simply exchange the variables and observe what would happened.
Solution. Notice that the left hand side is already symmetric. Switch x, y, we see that
We now want to choose y that minimizes the number of uncertain values. After solving
y 2 − y = 0 ⇔ y = 0, 1
f (x) = 0, ∀x ∈ R or f (x) = x2 , ∀x ∈ R
35
Indeed, switching the variables is equivalent to comparing P (x, y) , P (y, x). We usually
get a simple identity, which is much easier to solve the function. The only bad news is: In
most of the problems, LHS and RHS aren’t symmetric.
To deal with this situation, we can assert a special form to one of the variables.
Example 33. Find all functions f : N → N so that
Solution. As the previous comment, to make LHS become symmetric, substitute f (y) for
y, then we get
f (f (x) + f (y)) = x + f (f (y))
Now, the LHS is symmetric and we can switch x and y (Hooray!)
This means
f (f (z)) = z + c, ∀z ∈ N
for some constant c (why) Recall, in chapter one, I have mentioned: Always use the little
result to get another identity. In this example,
So f is eventually linear. Like what we do in chapter three: for any given x, take a sufficient
large y, we can see that x, f (x) satisfy the same linear equation and we conclude that f is
linear. The rest is easy.
Remark 6. In chapter one, we solve this FE by using the injectivity.
Example 34. Find all functions f : R → R satisfying the following equation
This identity isn’t very useful. Thus, we need to find another one. Rewrite the condition
Replace x by f (x),
must hold. And thus, f must be linear (why) Assume f (x) = ax + b, we have
f (x) = x + 1, ∀x ∈ R
Example 35. (2016 Iran) Find all functions f : N → N such that for all a, b ∈ N, we have
As the result,
f (f (n)) = n + c
for some constant c. Note that f has fixed point:
Although this trick is useful, there are still many problems can’t be solved in this way.
For example,
Example 36. (Based on: 2014 Romania) Find all functions f : R+ → R+ such that
Fortunately, if we modify our trick a little bit, the previous FE becomes trivial.
3.2 Three variables method
As the previous discussion, we hope to find a more useful trick. Our idea is simple! Usually,
we got stuck after switching variables because there are many restrictions. Consequently, we
introduce a ”free” variable in order to ignore the restrictions.
As the result,
f (x + y) = x + g (y) , ∀x, y ∈ R+
f (x + 3f (y + z)) = f (x) + f (y + z) + 2 (y + z)
We hope that there is another way to calculate LHS. According to the condition, we tend to
replace z by 3f (z):
We conclude that
f (x + 6z) = f (x) + 6f (z)
holds for all x, y ∈ R+ . Now,
f (x + z) = f (x) + f (z) + c
f (x) = x, ∀x ∈ R+
After simplification,
f (x + y + 2z) + 2z = f (x) + y + 2f (z)
By switching the variables, we see that f is linear and thus,
f (x) = x, ∀x ∈ R+
Thus,
f (x) + f (f (x)) = 2x + c
for some constant c. According to Example 20, we conclude that
f (x) = x, ∀x ∈ R+
Solution. The solution is due to Andreas Dwi Maryanto Gunawan, from Indonesia.
For any positive reals z, we have that
f (x + f (y)) + z = f (x + y) + f (y) + z
f (f (x + f (y)) + z) = f (f (x + y) + f (y) + z)
Again, we have
⇒ f (x + y + z) + f (y) = f (x + 2y + z)
The rest is a routine work.
for some functions g, h. Then we can try to compare P (x, y + g (z)) and P (x + h (y, z) , y)
So f (24 ) = 1, which is absurd! Thus, we conclude that there is not such a function.
Remark 11. If we apply the following transformation: Let g : log S → log S defined by
Consequently,
And so,
2g (d) = g (4d) = g (2d) + c = g (d) + 2c → g (d) = 2c
It follows that g ≡ 0, which is impossible!
Of course, we need to have some identities to ”open” the terms. Notice that we, initially,
have only the condition. Therefore, we usually use the given condition to do the trick.
f (f (f (. . . f (f (q)) . . . )))
| {z }
n
It follows that
f (a (n + 1 − a) q) = f (nq)
holds for all a ∈ {1, 2, · · · , n}. In particular,
f a a2 − a + 1 − a q = f a2 − a q → f (q) = f (mq) , ∀m ∈ N
0
by simple substitution. Now, for any x, y ∈ Q+ , write x, y as qr , qr0 , respectively. Then
Remark 12. Since we expect the only function is constant, we may want to show that for
any x, y ∈ Q+, there are some a < n ∈ N and q ∈ Q+ such that
(
x = a (n − a) q
y = nq
This is not so obvious. The readers can try to give it a proof or a counter example.
In most situations, it suffices to find out ”short” (because we hope to get a simple result)
identities in the beginning.
Example 43. (Socrates) Find all functions f : R+ → R+ so that
f x3 − f y 3 = (x − y) f x2 + f (xy) + f y 2 , ∀x, y ∈ R+
f x3 − f z 3 = f x3 − f y 3 + f y 3 − f z 3
Therefore, we have
x2 − 1 f x4 + f x2 + 1 = x2 − x f x4 + f x3 + f x2
+ (x − 1) f x2 + f (x) + 1
After simplification,
f x4 = x (x − 1) f x2 + x2 − x + 1 f (x) + x (x − 1)
3 4
Our idea is to calculate f (x12 ) in two ways. Since (x4 ) = x12 = (x3 ) , it follows
f x12 = h x3 , f x3 , f x6
= h x3 , g x, f (x) , f x2 , g x2 , f x2 , f x4
= h x3 , g x, f (x) , f x2 , g x2 , f x2 , h x, f (x) , f x2
and
f x12 = g x4 , f x4 , f x8
= g x4 , h x, f (x) , f x2 , h x2 , f x2 , f x4
= g x3 , h x, f (x) , f x2 , h x2 , f x2 , h x, f (x) , f x2
f x2 + f (x) = x2 + x, ∀x ∈ R+
Finally,
f x3 = (x − 1) f x2 + f (x) + 1 + 1 = (x − 1) x2 + x + 1 + 1 = x3
Usually, we use two operations which are commute to realize our idea.
3.4 Exercise
We begin with standard exercises.
f (x + f (y)) = x + f (f (y))
f (x + 2f (y)) = f (x + y) + y, ∀x, y ∈ R+
Problem 33. (Own) Find all functions f : N → N satisfying that for all a, b ∈ N,
f (x + f (y)) + x = f (x + f (x)) + y
Problem 36. (2017 Iran) Find all functions f : R+ × R+ → R+ that satisfy the following
conditions: for all positive reals x, y, z,
f (f (x, y) , z) = x2 y 2 f (x, z)
and
f (x, 1 + f (x, y)) ≥ x2 + xyf (x, x)
Problem 37. (2010 A5) Determine all functions f : Q+ → Q+ which satisfy the following
equation for all x, y ∈ Q+ :
f f (x)2 y = x3 f (xy)
Problem 39. (2005 A2) Find all functions f : R+ → R+ which have the property:
Problem 41. (2013 USA) Find all functions f : N → N that satisfy the equation
for all a, b, c ≥ 2