Case Study

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
At a glance
Powered by AI
The case study discusses a construction project for a stadium that faces tight deadlines and risks of weather delays. A risk assessment and Gantt chart are proposed to help manage resources and meet expectations.

The critical paths for the project are 2-5-6-8-10-14-15-19 and 2-5-6-9-10- 14-15-20. The total number of working days within the timeframe for the project is 753 days but if the critical paths are generating a timeline of 945 days.

I will not recommend G&E to pursue the project based on the data from the critical paths and the gantt chart shows that the project can’t be completed within the timeline. It would be detrimental for G& E to pursue this project knowing that it will incur a huge amount of debt hence losing the anticipated profit of $3 million.

Running head: SHORELINE STADIUM CASE 1

Shoreline Stadium Case

Abdul Majeed

Liberty University
SHORELINE STADIUM CASE 2

Summary

The case study is regarding a proposal presented by G&E Company in their quest to win

the bid for the Shoreline stadium. This project is expected to begin on July 3, 2017 and expected

to be completed no later than April 3, 2020 where a penalty charge of $ 250,000 per day is

accrued by G & E company. The President of the company is optimistic that G&E can maximize

a profit of about $ 3 million on the project and it may also increase their chances of winning

other similar projects if successful. This paper will include a risk assessment and a gantt chart

and schedule to ensure that G&E is able to manage its time and resources properly and ensure it

achieves the expectations set.

Will the project be able to be completed by the April 3 deadline? How long will it take?

The Shoreline stadium project is faced with a tight deadline when non-working days and

holidays are observed and deducted from the number of days available for G&E. But if the only

issue faced by G&E is been excused from work on holidays and other non-working days then the

company can complete the project before the April 3, 2020 deadline. The only other issue G&E

failed to consider is weather related issues. It is very difficult to predict the weather and thus,

snow, rain, tornadoes and other similar events tend to halt the progress of many projects.

Because of that, it will be very difficult to definitively conclude that the project will be

completed by the deadline. According to Agyei (2015), “reducing the project duration can be

achieved by adding more resources to the performance of the activity in the form of overtime,

resources or by assigning additional labor” (p.222). G&E will be successful if it maximizes its

resources available to the organization in achieving the objectives of the project. Based on the
SHORELINE STADIUM CASE 3

gantt chart, the project will be concluded by February 12, 2021. This project must be avoided

because G & E will be incurring $250,000 a day making it not productive for the organization.

What is the critical path for the project?

The critical path of this project is geared around the process of roofing and the inspection.

These two aspects formulate the critical paths of the project because of their direct relationship to

the progress made with the project. Based on the data from table 6.3, the project has two

potential critical paths. The critical paths for the project are 2-5-6-8-10-14-15-19 and 2-5-6-9-10-

14-15-20. The total number of working days within the timeframe for the project is 753 days but

if the critical paths are generating a timeline of 945 days.

Based on the schedule would you recommend that G&E pursue this contact? Why?

Include a one-page Gantt chart for the stadium schedule.

I will not recommend G&E to pursue the project based on the data from the critical paths and the

gantt chart shows that the project can’t be completed within the timeline. According to Sadgrove

(2016), “an organization that tries to obliterate all possible dangers can’t create value” (p.4).

Even though some level of risk is encouraged to achieve success, it would be detrimental for G&

E to pursue this project knowing that it will incur a huge amount of debt hence losing the

anticipated profit of $3 million. If G & E was to pursue this project, it will be continuously doing

check ups to ensure the project is conforming to the timeline and addressing any issues that may

be affecting the project. This will increase the total cost of the project because of the extra

resources that will be channeled to ensure the project is keeping up with the timeline.
SHORELINE STADIUM CASE 4

Appendix A

Risk Response Matrix

Contingency
Risk Event Response Trigger Who is Responsible
Plan
 Mitigate  Offer Severe weather  G&E/Construction
Bad weather overtime such as snow, firm
rain and
 Additional tornado.
shift and pay
Delay of  Mitigate  Avoid waiting Delay in timing  Project Manager
materials  Avoid until depletion of materials  Supplier
of resources  G&E
before
ordering.
 Find
secondary
supplies
Failure to  Avoid  Review Continuous bad  Project Manager
meet timeline weather and  G&E
deadline regularly to delays in
resources.
ensure project
is on track
 Hiring a
project
manager
Staffing  Avoid Have on call Employees  Project Manager
staff calling in sick  G&E
or injured
employees.
SHORELINE STADIUM CASE 5

References

Agyei, W. (2015). Project planning and scheduling using PERT and CPM techniques with linear

programming: case study. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research,

4(8), 222-227.

Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries,

game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.

Sadgrove, K. (2016). The complete guide to business risk management. Routledge.

You might also like