Desalination: Pankaj Sharma, Ramnit Kaur, Chinnappan Baskar, Wook-Jin Chung
Desalination: Pankaj Sharma, Ramnit Kaur, Chinnappan Baskar, Wook-Jin Chung
Desalination: Pankaj Sharma, Ramnit Kaur, Chinnappan Baskar, Wook-Jin Chung
Desalination
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / d e s a l
Removal of methylene blue from aqueous waste using rice husk and rice husk ash
Pankaj Sharma a,⁎, Ramnit Kaur b, Chinnappan Baskar a, Wook-Jin Chung a
a
Energy and Environment Fusion Technology Center, Department of Environmental Engineering and Biotechnology, Myongji University, San 38-2, Nam-dong,
Cheoin-Gu, Yongin-Si 449-728, Republic of Korea
b
Department of Chemistry, Lovely School of Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144402, Punjab, India
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Present study investigates the potential use of pretreated rice husk (RH) and rice husk ash (RHA) for the
Received 12 January 2010 removal of methylene blue (MB) from wastewater. A series of batch experiments were carried out to
Received in revised form 2 March 2010 determine the influence of different system variables. Neutral pH was optimum for the removal of MB.
Accepted 23 March 2010
Adsorption of MB on RH and RHA was favorably influenced by an increase in the temperature of the
Available online 13 May 2010
operation. The comparative studies of these two adsorbents, RA and RHA with the earlier reported
Keywords:
adsorbents obtained from agricultural and industrial waste products, inorganic materials and bioadsorbents,
Rice husk reveals that RH and RHA have maximum adsorption capacity. Adsorption data was fitted to the Langmuir,
Dye and Freundlich adsorption model. The former model achieved best fit with the experimental data and its
Adsorption calculated maximum monolayer adsorption capacity have a value of 1347.7 mg g− 1 for adsorption on RH
Methylene blue and 1455.6 mg g− 1 for adsorption on RHA at a temperature of 323 K. The change in heat of adsorption (ΔHo)
Isotherm and entropy (ΔSo) values for MB adsorption on RH as well as RHA were positive. The high negative values for
Pretreatment Gibbs free energy (ΔGo) indicate the feasible and spontaneous adsorption of MB on RH and RHA.
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0011-9164/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.desal.2010.03.044
250 P. Sharma et al. / Desalination 259 (2010) 249–257
harmful if swallowed and may create some problems if inhaled or in the oven and rest of the RH dried at room temperature. The biomass
made in contact with skin or eye. was sieved and 20–40 mesh was used for the batch experiment. RHA
used as obtained from a nearby paper mill (Barnala paper mill, Punjab,
India) and then properly grinded into fine powder for the removal of
methylene blue from waste water by batch treatment process. The
following were the starting materials used for the adsorption studies
of MB dye: pretreated RH and RHA, moreover before each adsorption
study these adsorbents are activated by placing the adsorbent in
preheated oven at 343 K for 4 h.
of RH and RHA varying from 250–1250 mg to different concentrations essential characteristics of Langmuir equation could be expressed by a
(50–2000 mg L− 1) of dye solutions. This adsorption experiment is dimensionless constant called equilibrium parameter or separation
performed at fixed values of pH equals 7, temperature equals 303 ± factor, RL which can be calculated by the following equation [45]:
1 K, equilibration time 30 min. Batch adsorption studies were also
conducted at different contact times (20–180 min) at initial concen- RL = 1 = ð1 + Ka Co Þ: ð7Þ
tration of MB 500 mg L− 1 and adsorbent concentration 40 mg mL− 1
in 25 mL solution. Adsorbent and solution were separated at pre-
decided time intervals, filtered, centrifuged and analyzed for residual Generally, a suitable non-conventional low-cost adsorbent for dye
MB concentrations in the solution phase spectrophotometrically. The adsorption should meet the following requirements: (i) efficient for
influence of pH on the adsorption potential of RH as well as RHA was removal of dye; (ii) high adsorption capacity and rate of adsorption;
studied at different pH values, as it is an important parameter for (iii) high selectivity; and (iv) tolerant of a wide range of wastewater
interaction that take place between adsorbent and adsorbate on the parameters. By keeping all these points in mind we tried to make a
adsorbent surface. The role of pH on the adsorption capacity of RH and comparative study between the naturally available low-cost adsor-
RHA was studied in the pH range 1.0–9.0 at MB concentration bents such as agricultural by products, industrial waste materials,
1000 mg L− 1, temperature 303 ± 1 K, equilibration time 30 min and plants and fruit waste, naturally available inorganic materials and
adsorbent dose 500 mg (i.e. 20 mg mL− 1). As we know that biosorbents on the basis of their adsorption capacity for MB removal.
temperature of the system have remarkable effect on the adsorption Several research groups have investigated the application of com-
process, therefore in order to optimize the system temperature for mercial and non-commercial naturally available adsorbents for the
maximum removal efficiency, experiments were conducted at three treatment of industrial effluent contaminated with organic dyes by
different temperatures viz. 303, 313, and 323 ± 1 K by varying dye adsorption process but no one have compared their adsorption
concentration and keeping other parameters constant such as pH 7, capacities.
equilibration time 30 min and adsorbent dose 20 mg mL− 1.
The Gibbs free energy change of the adsorption process is related 3. Results and discussion
to the equilibrium constant by the classic Van't Hoff equation:
3.1. Characterization of RH and RHA
o
ΔG = −RT ln Kd : ð2Þ
FTIR spectra showed that rice husk and rice husk ash contained
According to thermodynamics, the Gibbs free energy change is also functional groups of the standard polymers α-cellulose, and coirpith-
related to the entropy change and heat of adsorption at constant lignin (Fig. 1). The spectrum of RH-cellulose extracted from rice husk
temperature by the following equation: is very similar to that of α-cellulose. The FTIR spectrum of RH/RHA
shows functional groups from Si–O–Si (1096 cm− 1), Si–H (801 cm− 1,
ΔG = ΔH −TΔS : ð3Þ 469 cm− 1) and Si–OH (3000–3700 cm− 1 broad band). Heating RHA
at 300 °C resulted in a loss of C–H stretching bands (2910 cm− 1), C–C
On combining Eqs. (2) and (3), we get and C–H (1021 cm− 1), C–O and C–O–C (1060 cm− 1 and 1115 cm− 1),
and C–O–H (899 cm− 1) [14]. These were replaced by the primary
ln Kd = −ΔG = RT = ΔS = R −ΔH = RT ð4Þ functional groups of NC O (1715 cm− 1), N C O and/or aromatic ring
(1611 cm− 1) [15], and dominated the silica functional groups of Si–
where ΔGo is the free energy change (kJ mol− 1), ΔHo the change in O–Si (1096 cm− 1), Si–H (801, 469 cm− 1) and OH and Si–OH (3000–
enthalpy (kJ mol− 1), ΔSo the entropy change (J mol− 1 K− 1), T the 3700 cm− 1) [16]. FTIR spectra of rice husk and rice husk ash are
absolute temperature (K) and R the universal gas constant shown in Fig. 1. The spectra are virtually identical. The electron
(8.314 J mol− 1 K− 1). Thus ΔSo can be recorded from the intercept microscopic studies (Fig. 2) of both the adsorbent reveals that RH
and ΔHo can be determined by the slope of the linear Van't Hoff plot, have fibrous character with particle size of 40–100 μm, but on the
i.e., as lnKd versus 1/T. other hand the RHA have particles of comparatively smaller size,
The adsorption isotherms were studied for the initial MB moreover these particles are of spherical shape.
concentration ranging from 100–1000 mg L− 1. Using a method of
linear regression, the adsorption data were fitted to Langmuir [42] 3.2. Effect of dye concentration and adsorbent dosage
and Freundlich [43] adsorption model to describe the adsorption
processes between solid–liquid interface. Before designing an adsorption treatment process it is very much
Langmuir isotherm; necessary to optimize dye concentration and the amount of adsorbent
to be used for that dye's removal. It has been found that (Fig. 3) with
Ce = qe = 1 = ðKa qm Þ + Ce = qm ð5Þ the increase in concentration of the adsorbate, the adsorption
percentage decreases, while the amount of dye removed at equilib-
where, qe is the amount of MB adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent
rium increased, with the increase in dye concentration in both the
(mg g− 1), Ce (mg L− 1) is the equilibrium concentration of the MB in
cases. This is so because the initial dye concentration provides the
the solution. Ka and qm are the Langmuir coefficients representing the
driving force to overcome the resistance to the mass transfer of dye
equilibrium constant for the adsorbate–adsorbent equilibrium and
between the aqueous and solid phase. The increase in initial
the monolayer capacity respectively.
concentration also enhances the interaction between adsorbent and
Freundlich isotherm;
dye. Therefore, an increase in initial concentration of dye solution
1 enhances the adsorption uptake of dye.
log qe = log KF + log Ce ð6Þ Fig. 3 also reveals that that the dye removal increases with increase
n
in adsorbent dosage. An increase in the adsorption with adsorbent
where, KF and 1/n are the Freundlich constants. The value of KF (mg g− 1) dosage can be attributed to greater surface area and the availability of
can be taken as a relative indicator of adsorption capacity, while 1/n more adsorption sites. It can be seen that 750 mg of RH in 25 ml of
shows the energy or intensity of adsorption. 500 mg L− 1, and 500 mg of RHA in 25 mL of 1000 mg L− 1 initial MB
Furthermore the feasibility of the adsorption process is evaluated concentration after agitation time of 30 min respectively, the amount
by the method suggested by Weber and Chakraborti [44]. One of the of dye being adsorbed was nearly 100%. With this data, it was decided
252 P. Sharma et al. / Desalination 259 (2010) 249–257
that 750 mg of adsorbent in case of RH and 500 mg in case of RHA is is applied for both the adsorbents. Effect of equilibration time on
sufficient for these adsorption studies. adsorption of MB dye onto RH and RHA is presented in Fig. 4. The
study of the graph reveals that as the contact time increases, rate of
adsorption first increases and then remains almost constant. Fig. 4
3.3. Effect of equilibration time study illustrated that rate of adsorption of MB was very fast during the initial
stage of the adsorption processes. After fast initial rate of adsorption,
For the evaluation of adsorption process as a function of contact the MB uptake capacity for both the adsorbents RH and RHA increased
time between adsorbate and adsorbent, 20 to 180 min contact interval with the time and reached equilibrium value at about 30 min, since
maximum adsorption is attained during this period. The concentra-
tion gradient will be responsible for these changes in the rate of
adsorption. In the beginning because of high concentration gradient
the driving force helped in this rapid adsorption. However as the
concentration gradient decreased with time the rate was reduced till
it achieved equilibrium. This may be the reason that after a particular
time interval adsorption percentage remains almost constant.
Fig. 3. Effect of adsorbate concentration and adsorbent dose on the adsorption percentage of MB onto RH and RHA.
of the adsorbent particle, owing to decrease in the velocity of the further. The close examination of the Fig. 6 reveals that even though at
solution. In addition changing the temperature will change the high initial dye concentration, we can achieve 100 percent dye
equilibrium capacity of the adsorbent for particle adsorbate. removal by raising the temperature by 10–15 K, which is compara-
Experimental results concerning the effect of temperature on the tively low at lower temperature.
system of dyes adsorption at different initial dye concentration are In environmental engineering practice, both energy and entropy
demonstrated in Fig. 6. In both the cases of MB adsorption on RH and factors must be considered in order to determine which process will
RHA, the adsorption percentage increases when the temperature of occur spontaneously. The ΔGo is the fundamental criterion of
solution increased from 303 to 323 ± 1 K, indicating the process to be spontaneity. The calculated apparent thermodynamic parameters
endothermic in nature. Better adsorption at higher temperature may for adsorption of MB onto RH as well as RHA are summarized in
be either due to acceleration of some originally slow sorption steps or Table 1 and the Van't Hoff plot is represented in Fig. 7. The negative
due to creation of new active sites on the sorbent surface. Thus an values of ΔGo are due to the fact that the adsorption process is
increase in temperature will reduce the electrostatic repulsion spontaneous with high affinity of MB to RH and RHA. Moreover, the
between the surface and the adsorbing species, allowing adsorption negative value of ΔGo becomes more and more negative which
to occur more readily. This could also be due to enhanced mobility of indicates that the adsorption process becomes more spontaneous
dye molecules from solution to the adsorbent surface. Furthermore, with rise in temperature, which favors the adsorption process.
increasing temperature may produce a swelling effect within the Positive value of ΔHo confirms the endothermic nature of the sorption
internal structure of RH and RHA enabling large dye to penetrate process. Hence, by increasing temperature, the degree of adsorption
Fig. 4. Effect of time contact between the solid and liquid phase on the adsorption percentage of MB onto RH and RHA.
254 P. Sharma et al. / Desalination 259 (2010) 249–257
Fig. 5. Effect of pH of the aqueous phase on the adsorption percentage of MB onto RH and RHA.
will increase. The numerical value of ΔHo also, predicts the value. Adsorption equilibrium parameters and statistical error
physicosorption behavior of these adsorption processes. The positive variable (R2 and SD) for MB adsorption onto RH and RHA were
value of ΔSo reflected the affinity of the adsorbent for particular dye displayed in the same order in Table 2. However, the Langmuir
and confirms the increased randomness at the solid–solution adsorption isotherms are presented in Fig. 8. The maximum value of
interface during adsorption. adsorption capacity obtained from Langmuir adsorption isotherm was
1455.6 mg g− 1 i.e. for MB adsorption on RHA. The adsorption capacity
3.6. Equilibrium parameters data also reveals that an adsorption capacity increases with rise in
temperature in both the cases. A high Ka value indicates the high
Equilibrium data, commonly known as adsorption isotherms, are affinity of adsorbent for MB adsorption. Moreover in case of RHA,
basic requirements for the design of adsorption systems. The most when the adsorption experiments were carried out at 313 and 323 K,
widely used isotherms equation for modeling of the adsorption data the Ka values comes out infinity, as in these two cases 100% adsorption
are the Langmuir and Freundlich equations. Adsorption isotherms occur (means Ce was zero). Therefore higher the temperature, higher
constants depend on certain parameters, whose values express the the Ka and maximum adsorption capacity (qm), a higher temperature
surface properties and the affinity of the adsorbent. They can also we is also favorable for adsorption. This increase in adsorption intensity
used to compare the adsorptive capacity of different adsorbents for and adsorption capacity may be due to the change in pore size/volume
different dyes. Experimental results obtained for MB adsorption onto and enhanced rate of intra-particle diffusion of solute, as diffusion is
respective adsorbent (RH/RHA) at three different temperatures (303, an endothermic process.
313, and 323 ± 1 K) were fitted to Langmuir isotherm model, the plot Evolution of Freundlich adsorption isotherms is also an important
between Ce/qe and Ce yield straight lines (Fig. 8) with very high step in characterizing the adsorption process as it provides an
correlation coefficient values (R2) and low standard deviation (SD) approximate estimation of sorption capacity of the adsorbent. The
Fig. 6. Effect of system temperature on the adsorption percentage of MB onto RH and RHA studied at different initial dye concentrations.
P. Sharma et al. / Desalination 259 (2010) 249–257 255
Fig. 7. Variation of lnKd with temperature (1/T) for the adsorption of MB onto RH and RHA at initial dye concentration of 2000 ppm (Van't Hoff plot).
Fig. 8. Langmuir adsorption isotherm for the MB adsorption onto RH and RHA at three different temperatures.
256 P. Sharma et al. / Desalination 259 (2010) 249–257
Table 2
Adsorption isotherm constants for MB adsorption onto RH and RHA at three different temperatures.
Langmuir constants
Temperature RH RHA
2
Ka qm R SD RL Ka qm R2 SD RL
(L mg−1) (mg g−1) (L mg− 1) (mg g−1)
303 K 0.266 1015.7 0.999 0.005 0.00188 0.525 1253.1 1.0 0.002 0.00095
313 K 0.521 1191.5 0.999 0.003 0.00096 ∞* 1377.4 1.0 0.000 0.0
323 K 0.618 1347.7 0.999 0.002 0.00081 ∞* 1455.6 1.0 0.000 0.0
Freundlich constants
Temperature RH RHA
KF n R2 SD KF n R2 SD
and RHA have maximum potential for the removal of methylene blue will be the RHA and RH. This demonstrated that RHA can be used for
from aqueous waste. Out of these two RHA was better adsorbent. The the decontamination of effluents. It offers both a procedure of choice
RH and RHA can be used for the treatment of industrial effluent. Both for extraction processes and a lot of promising benefits for commercial
these adsorbent were readily available, inexpensive and are effective. purposes.
They also possess several other advantages that make them excellent
materials for environmental purposes, such as high capacity (Table 2
and Fig. 9) and rate of adsorption (Fig. 3), high selectivity for different 4. Conclusions
concentrations (Fig. 3), and also rapid kinetics. Fig. 9 presents a view
of some of the highest adsorption capacities reported [46–73] and The adsorption treatment process will provide an attractive
studied. From the recent literature reviewed, adsorbents that stand technology, if the low-cost adsorbents are ready for use. Some time
out for high adsorption capacities are commercially activated carbon adsorbents are physically and chemically treated to improve its
(980.3 mg g− 1), bark (914.0), and activated carbon prepared from adsorption efficiency. These pretreatment processes were so chosen
plum kernels by NaOH activation (828 mg g− 1). These adsorbents are that these should be cost effective. Generally these pretreatment
efficient and can be used effectively for the removal of MB from methods are not cost effective when we apply at large scale, but the
aqueous solutions, but these adsorbent have even less adsorption treatment process we adopted will be cost effective as the rice husk
capacity than that of RH and RHA. So after this study the first choice ash used for adsorption studies was also obtained from the paper mill.
Fig. 9. Compared maximum adsorption capacities for methylene blue on several low-cost adsorbents, and RH and RHA.
P. Sharma et al. / Desalination 259 (2010) 249–257 257
So RHA is also an industrial waste product. In our study we also found [16] R.P. Han, Y.F. Wang, P. Han, J. Shi, J. Yang, Y.S. Lu, J. Hazard. Mater. 137 (2006)
550–557.
out that pretreatment of the adsorbent, improve its adsorption [17] K.G. Bhattacharyya, A. Sharma, Dyes Pigments 57 (2003) 211–222.
efficiency. Rice husk has low removal efficiencies and adsorption [18] K.G. Bhattacharyya, A. Sharma, J. Environ. Manage. 71 (2004) 217–229.
capacities for MB removal, but on the other hand physical and [19] P. Waranusantigul, P. Pokethitiyook, M. Kruatrachue, E.S. Upatham, Environ. Poll.
125 (2003) 385–392.
chemical treatment of RH and RHA significantly improve its [20] P. Janoš, H. Buchtová, M. Ryznarová, Water Res. 37 (2003) 4938–4944.
adsorption potential. The present investigation shows that RH and [21] V. Ponnusami, S. Vikram, S.N. Srivastava, J. Hazard. Mater. 152 (2008) 276–286.
RHA can be employed effectively for the treatment of dyeing effluents [22] J.Z. Yi, L.M. Zhang, Biores. Technol. 99 (2008) 2182–2186.
[23] M.I. El-Khaiary, J. Hazard. Mater. 147 (2007) 28–34.
containing methylene blue dye. The waste RH and RHA is abundantly [24] L. Wang, A. Wang, J. Hazard. Mater. 147 (2007) 979–985.
available in northern India and hence its application to the treatment [25] K.V. Kumar, K. Porkodi, J. Hazard. Mater. 146 (2007) 214–226.
of dyeing wastewater is expected to be economically feasible. They [26] R. Gong, S. Zhu, D. Zhang, J. Chen, S. Ni, R. Guan, Desalination 230 (2008) 220–228.
[27] A. Özer, G. Dursun, J. Hazard. Mater. 146 (2007) 262–269.
may also be useful in the treatment of other harmful and undesirable
[28] B. Bestani, N. Benderdouche, B. Benstaali, M. Belhakem, A. Addou, Biores. Technol.
species present in the effluent. Higher adsorption capacities for 99 (2008) 8441–8444.
selective removal of methylene blue with RH and RHA could be [29] F.A. Pavan, E.C. Lima, S.L.P. Dias, A.C. Mazzocato, J. Hazard. Mater. 150 (2008)
carried out in an adsorption treatment process by adjusting the pH 703–712.
[30] A.E. Omaja, Biochem. Eng. J. 40 (2008) 8–18.
around 7, equilibration time of 30 min, and system temperature of [31] M. Zhao, P. Liu, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 112 (2008) 419–424.
323 K. The thermodynamic study indicated that the adsorption of [32] S. Karag z, T. Tay, S. Ucar, M. Erdem, Biores. Technol. 99 (2008) 6214–6222.
dyes was spontaneous and endothermic. [33] A. Mittal, A. Malviya, D. Kaur, J. Mittal, L. Kurup, J. Hazard. Mater. 148 (2007)
229–240.
[34] P. Janoš, S. Coskun, V. Pilarova, J. Rejnek, Biores. Technol. 100 (2009) 1450–1453.
[35] Y. Zhi-yuan, J. China Univ, Min. Technol. 18 (2008) 437–440.
Symbols [36] K. Rastogi, J.N. Sahu, B.C. Meikap, M.N. Biswas, J. Hazard. Mater. 158 (2008)
531–540.
ΔGo the Gibbs free energy change (kJ mol− 1) [37] V.C. Srivastava, I.D. Mall, I.M. Mishra, J. Hazard. Mater. 134 (2006) 257–267.
ΔHo the heat of adsorption (kJ mol− 1) [38] W. Nakbanpote, B.A. Goodmanb, P. Thiravetyan, Colloids Surfaces A 304 (2007)
ΔSo the entropy change (J mol− 1 K− 1) 7–13.
[39] V.C. Srivastava, I.D. Mall, I.M. Mishra, Colloids Surfaces A 312 (2008) 172–184.
Co the initial concentration of the dye solution (mg L− 1) [40] K.S. Chou, J.C. Tsai, C.T. Lo, Biores. Technol. 78 (2001) 217–219.
Ce the concentration of dye solution (mg L− 1) at equilibrium [41] J.C. Saha, K. Dikshit, M. Byopadhyay, Comparative studies for selection
qe the amount of dye adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent technologies for arsenic removal from drinking water BUET-UNU International
(mg g− 1) Workshop on Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water,
Bangladesh, , 2001.
Kd the distribution coefficient (mL g− 1) [42] I. Langmuir, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40 (1918) 1361–1403.
V the solution volume (mL) [43] H.M.F. Freundlich, Z. Phys. Chem. 57A (1906) 385–470.
W the amount of adsorbent (g) [44] T.W. Weber, R.K. Chakraborti, J. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. 20 (1974) 228–238.
[45] K.R. Hall, L.C. Eagleton, A. Acrivers, T. Vermenlem, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 5 (1966)
T the absolute temperature (K) 212–223.
R the universal gas constant (8.314 J mol− 1 K− 1) [46] N.C. Filho, E.C. Venancio, M.F. Barriquello, A.A. Hechenleitner, E.A.G. Pineda,
Ka the Langmuir constant representing the equilibrium con- Ecletica Quim. Sao Paulo 32 (2007) 63–70.
[47] F. Rozada, L.F. Calvo, A.I. Garcia, J. Martin-Villacorta, M. Otero, Biores. Technol. 87
stant (L mg− 1) (2003) 221–230.
qm the Langmuir constant representing the maximum mono- [48] A. Gürses, S. Karaca, C. Dogar, R. Bayrak, M. Acikyildiz, M. Yalcin, J. Colloid
layer capacity (mg g− 1) Interface, Sci. 269 (2004) 310–314.
[49] A. Aygün, S. Yenisoy-Karakaş, I. Duman, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 66 (2003)
KF the Freundlich constant as a relative indicator of adsorption 189–195.
capacity (mg g− 1) [50] C. Namasivayam, S. Sumithra, J. Environ. Manage. 74 (2005) 207–215.
1/n the Freundlich constant as intensity of adsorption [51] F.A. Batzias, D.K. Sidiras, J. Hazard. Mater. B114 (2004) 167–174.
[52] D. Ghosh, K.G. Bhattacharyya, Appl. Clay Sci. 20 (2002) 295–300.
RL the separation factor [53] F.A. Pavan, Y. Gushikem, A.C. Mazzoczto, S.L.P. Dias, E.C. Lima, Dyes Pigments 72
(2007) 256–266.
[54] F. Banat, S. Al-Asheh, L. Al-Makhadmeh, Process Biochem. 39 (2003) 193–202.
[55] N. Al-Bastaki, F. Banat, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 41 (2004) 103–113.
Acknowledgements [56] S. Karaca, A. Gürses, R. Bayrak, Energy Convers. Manage. 45 (2004) 1693–1704.
[57] F.A. Pavan, E.C. Lima, S.L.P. Dias, A.C. Mazzocata, J. Hazard. Mater. 150 (2008)
A part of this work was supported by Priority Research Centers 703–712.
[58] V.K. Garg, M. Amita, R. Kumar, R. Gupta, Dyes Pigments 63 (2004) 243–250.
Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [59] M.T. Uddin, M.A. Islam, S. Mahmud, M. Rukanuzzaman, J. Hazard. Mater. 164
funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2009- (2008) 53–60.
0093816). [60] A.L. Ahmad, M.M. Loh, J.A. Aziz, Dyes Pigments 75 (2007) 263–272.
[61] V. Ponnusami, R. Madhuram, V. Krithika, S.N. Srivastva, Chem. Eng. J. 140 (2008)
609–613.
References [62] S.P. Raghuvanshi, R. Singh, C.P. Kaushik, Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2 (2004) 35–43.
[63] M. Otero, F. Rozada, L.F. Calvo, A.I. García, A. Morán, Biochem. Eng. J. 15 (2003)
[1] G. Crini, Biores. Technol. 97 (2006) 1061–1085. 59–68.
[2] H. Zollinger, Synthesis, Properties Applications Organic Dyes Pigments, Color [64] K. Kadirvelu, M. Kavipriya, C. Karthika, M. Radhika, N. Vennilamani, S. Pattabhi,
Chem., VCH Publishers, New York, 1987, pp. 92–102. Biores. Technol. 87 (2003) 129–132.
[3] A.R. Gregory, S. Elliot, P. Kluge, J. Appl. Toxicol. 1 (1991) 308–313. [65] B.H. Hameed, A.A. Ahmad, J. Hazard. Mater. 164 (2009) 870–875.
[4] Z. Aksu, Process Biochem. 40 (2005) 997–1026. [66] K.V. Kumar, A. Kumrana, Biochem. Eng. J. 27 (2005) 83–93.
[5] G.M. Walker, L.R. Weatherley, Water Res. 1 (1997) 32093–32101. [67] N. Kannan, M.M. Sundaram, Dyes Pigments 51 (2001) 25–40.
[6] G.M. Walker, L.R. Weatherley, Environ. Poll. 99 (1998) 133–136. [68] M.A. Al-Ghouti, M.A.M. Khraisheh, S.J. Allen, M.N. Ahmad, J. Environ. Manage. 69
[7] K.V. Kumar, J. Hazard. Mater. 137 (2006) 1538–1544. (2003) 229–238.
[8] A. Özer, G. Dursun, J. Hazard. Mater. 146 (2007) 262–269. [69] K. Okada, N. Yamamoto, Y. Kameshima, A. Yasumori, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 262
[9] I.D. Mall, V.C. Srivastava, N.K. Agarwall, M. Mishra, Chemosphere 61 (2005) (2003) 194–199.
492–501. [70] A.A. Attia, B.S. Girgis, N.A. Fathy, Dyes Pigments 76 (2008) 282–289.
[10] A.A. Attia, B.S. Girgis, N.A. Fathy, Dyes Pigments 76 (2008) 282–289. [71] B. Royer, N.F. Cardoso, E.C. Lima, J.C.P. Vaghetti, N.M. Simon, T. Calvete, R.C. Veses,
[11] I.A.W. Tan, A.L. Ahmad, B.H. Hameed, Desalination 225 (2008) 13–28. J. Hazard. Mater. 164 (2009) 1213–1222.
[12] G. McKay, J.F. Porter, G.R. Prasad, Water Air Soil Poll. 114 (1999) 423–438. [72] R. Tseng, F. Wu, R. Juang, Carbon 41 (2003) 487–495.
[13] T.G. Chuah, A. Jumasiah, S. Katayon, Desalination 175 (2005) 305–316. [73] R. Tseng, J. Hazard. Mater. 147 (2007) 1020–1027.
[14] G. Annadurai, R.S. Juang, D.J. Lee, J. Hazard. Mater. B92 (2002) 263–274.
[15] V. Vadivelan, K.V. Kumar, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 286 (2005) 90–100.