i
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
Name : Antonio C. Lañoza Jr.
Birthdate : November 30, 1996
Birthplace : Tagkawayan, Quezon
Permanent Address : Brgy. Sta. Cecilia Tagkawayan, Quezon
Contact Number : (+63)9477539474
Educational Background:
School/University Inclusive Years Honor/Award
Tagkawayan Central Elementary School 2006-2007 None
Tagkawayan National High School 2010-2011 With honor
Southern Luzon State University Currently enrolled
-Judge Guillermo Eleazar
ii
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
Name : Windel R. Nogot
Birthdate : September 15, 1990
Birthplace : Tagkawayan, Quezon
Permanent Address : Brgy. Tabason, Tagkawayan, Quezon
Contact Number : (+63)9084214222
Educational Background:
School/University Inclusive Years Honor/Award
Tabason Elementary School 2002-2003 Third Honor
Tabason National High School 2006-2007 With honor
Southern Luzon State University Currently enrolled
-Judge Guillermo Eleazar
iii
CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY
I/we hereby affirm that this compliance is my own work and that, to the
best of my understanding and certainty, it covers no material previously published by
another person nor material to which to a considerable range has been acknowledged for
award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of higher learning,
except where due credit is made in the text.
I also declare that the logical content of this thesis is the product of my
own effort, even though I may have customary assistance from others on style,
presentation and semantic expression.
WINDEL R. NOGOT ANTONIO C LAÑOZA JR.
Signature of advisee over printed name Signature of advisee over printed name
CHERRY C. FAVOR, D. Sc.____
Signature of adviser over printed name
April 2018
Date
APPROVAL SHEET
iv
This research paper entitled, “Force and Motion: Basic Simulation in Teaching
Physics”, prepared and submitted by Antonio C. Lañoza Jr. and Windel R. Nogot, is
hereby recommended for oral examination.
CHERRY C. FAVOR D. Sc.
Research Adviser
Approved in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the subject PHYO7 (Research in
Physical Science) by the oral Examination Committee.
VICENTE S. ESMALDE, Ma. Ed JAY-AR C. RECTO, Ph. D.
Member Member
IMELDA A. TANGALIN, DPM, Ph.D.
Chairman
Accepted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor in
Secondary Education.
April 2018
Date IMELDA A. TANGALIN, DPM, Ph.D.
Assistant Director, Academic Affairs
DEDICATION
v
We wholeheartedly dedicate this study to our younger brother and sister, which will
benefit for their future learning. They serve as our inspiration, hope and strength.
To our friends as well for their untiring love, understanding and
support. Above all, to almighty God for giving us enough
ideas through his divine wisdom, knowledge for
better decision making, and love that
makes us patient and positive
minded in working to
this research
study.
WRN & A.C.L.JR.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
vi
The researchers would like to express their deepest thanks to those who became
Description Page
part in making Chapters one to three of this manuscript for their great help, assistance and
guidance in small and big ways.
To the assistant director, academic affairs and their chairman of the panelist Dr.
Imelda A. Tangalin, for her constructive criticisms, and guidance as professional
educator
To Dr. Cherry C. Favor, their adviser, for the guidance, helpful criticism,
support, encouragement and professional assistance.
To their panelist members, Prof. Vicente S. Esmalde, and Dr. Jay-ar C. Recto
for their constructive criticisms;
Mrs. Gelyn De Castro, for granting our request to conduct our study in TNHS;
To their Family, for the inspiration and motivation and all means of support.
To their co-science majors, for the collaborative work.
And above all, to the Almighty God, for the meaningful life, strength and
knowledge to make it possible.
The Researchers
WRN & A.C.L.JR.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
vii
Biographical Sketch i
Certificate of Originality iii
Approval Sheet iv
Dedication v
Acknowledgement vi
Table of Contents vii
List of Figures ix
List of Tables x
List of Appendices xi
Abstract xiii
Title Page xiv
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Background of the Study 2
Objectives 3
Significance of the Study 4
Scope and Limitation 5
Definition of Terms 6
Chapter II -Review of the Literature and Studies
Computer Simulated Experiment 8
Science Education 9
Computer Based Instruction 12
Academic Performance 13
Theoretical Framework 16
Theoretical Paradigm 17
Conceptual Framework 18
Hypothesis 18
Conceptual Paradigm 19
Chapter III – Methodology
Research Locale 20
Respondents of the Study 22
Research Design 23
Population and Sampling Technique 23
Research Instrumentation 23
Data Collection Procedure 24
Statistical Treatment 24
Chapter IV Results and Discussions
Achievement Level of the Students in the Control group and the
Experimental Group on their Pre-test Results 26
viii
Table 1 27
Achievement Level of the Students in the Control Group and the
Experimental Group on their Post-test Results 28
Table 2 29
Significant Differences Between the Control Group and
Experimental Group Based on their Pre-test Results, Post-tests and
Gain Scores 30
Pre-test Result 30
Significant Differences between the Control Group and
Experimental Group Based on their Pre-test Results, Post-test
Results and Gain Scores 30
Pre-test Result. 30
Table 3 and the Post-test Result. 31
Table 4 and the gain Score 32
Table 5 33
Chapter V Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations
Objectives 34
Findings 35
Conclusions and Recommendations 36
References Cited 38
Appendices 40
ix
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Description Page
1 Theoretical paradigm of the study on the effectiveness of Forces and 17
Motion: Basic Simulation in Teaching Physics Among the Sixty Grade
9 Students of Tagkawayan National High School who are enrolled for
the Academic Year 2017 – 2018.
2 Conceptual paradigm of the study on the effectiveness of Forces and 19
Motion: Basic Simulation in Teaching Physics Among the Sixty Grade
9 Students of Tagkawayan National High School who are enrolled for
the Academic Year 2017 – 2018.
x
LIST OF TABLES
Table Description Page
1. Achievement Level of the Control Group and Experimental 27
Group Based on the Pre-test Results
2. Achievement Level of the Control Group and Experimental 29
Group Based on the Post-test Results
3. Significant difference between the Control and Experimental 31
Group based from the pre-test result.
4. Significant difference between the Control and Experimental 32
Group based from the post-test result.
5. Significant difference between the Control and Experimental 33
Group based from the gain score result.
LIST OF APPENDICES
xi
Appendix Description Page
xii
Appendix A Letter of Request to the College Administrator 40
Appendix B Letter of Request for Pilot Testing 41
Appendix C Computation of Internal Consistency 42
Appendix D Computation of Item Analysis 46
Appendix E Letter of Request for Pilot Testing 48
Appendix F List of Respondents 49
Appendix G Pairing of Respondents 50
Appendix H Lesson Plan in Control Group 51
Appendix I Lesson Plan in Experimental Group 76
Appendix J Table of Specification 103
Appendix K Researcher Made-Test 104
Appendix L Answer Key 109
Appendix M Pre-test Results of the Control and Experimental 110
Group
Appendix N Post Test Results of the Control and Experimental 111
Group
Appendix O Gain Score of the Control Group 112
Appendix P Gain Score of the Experimental Group 113
Appendix Q Screenshot of Forces and Motion: Basic 114
Simulation
Appendix R SSPSS Computation and Analysis 115
Appendix S Letter of Request for Oral Examination 118
Appendix T Application for Research Oral Defense 119
Appendix U Application for Research Oral Defense 120
Appendix V Notice of oral Research Defense 121
xiii
Appendix W Oral Examination Evaluation Sheet 122
Appendix X Certification from the Statistician 123
Appendix Y Certification from the Editor 124
Appendix Z Certification From the Adviser 125
ABSTRACT
Title : Forces and Motion: Basic Simulation in Teaching Physics
Researchers : Antonio C. Lañoza Jr. and Windel Raposas Nogot.
Adviser : Dr. Cherry C. Favor
This study was conducted in the Tagkawayan National High School. The data was
collected using pre-test and post-test which consisted of thirty item test to both control
and experimental group which were designed to determine the effectiveness of the Forces
and Motion: Basic Simulation in Teaching Physics. Particularly, this study sought to:
determine the achievement level of the students in the control and experimental group
based on their pre-test result, determine the achievement level of the students in the
control and experimental group based on their post-test result, determine the significant
difference between the achievement level of the control group and experimental group
based on the result of pre-test, post-test, and gain scores.
xiv
The researchers gathered data were computed, analyzed and interpreted using SPSS. The
result given by the pre-test revealed that there was no significant difference between the
control and the experimental group with the interpretation as both fairly satisfactory
learner. However, the researchers found out that there was a high significant difference
between the control group and experimental in their post-test and gain scores. Thus,
Forces and Motion: Basic Simulation in Teaching Physics would improve the academic
achievement of the learners.
Keywords: FORCES, MOTION, SIMULATION,
VIRTUAL REALITY, PHYSICS
FORCES AND MOTION: BASIC SIMULATION
IN TEACHING PHYSICS
xv
Windel Raposas Nogot
Antonio C. Lañoza Jr.
Southern Luzon State University Judge Guillermo Eleazar
College of Teacher Education
April 2018