Emotional Awareness Awareness of Thoughts & Sensations Awareness of Strengths & Weaknessess Staying Focussed Self Discipline
Emotional Awareness Awareness of Thoughts & Sensations Awareness of Strengths & Weaknessess Staying Focussed Self Discipline
Self Awareness is having a clear perception of your personality, including strengths, weaknesses, thoughts,
beliefs, motivation, and emotions. Self Awareness allows you to understand other people, how they
perceive you, your attitude and your responses to them in the moment.
Self-Awareness is the thinking skill that focuses on a child's ability to accurately judge their own performance and
behavior and to respond appropriately to different social situations. Self-Awareness helps an individual to tune
into their feelings, as well as to the behaviors and feelings of others.
Self-awareness involves being aware of different aspects of the self including traits, behaviors, and feelings.
Essentially, it is a psychological state in which oneself becomes the focus of attention
2. WHY IS IT IMPORTANT?
Self awareness is important because when we have a better understanding of ourselves, we are able to
experience ourselves as unique and separate individuals. We are then empowered to make changes and to build
on our areas of strength as well as identify areas where we would like to make improvements.
Introspection is the process of examining our thoughts, feelings, and motives. It can lead to self-awareness, or
having our attention focused on ourselves. Self-Awareness Theory states that noticing ourselves and our
behavior leads us to judging our behavior according to our internal standards.
1. Keep an open mind. When you have the ability to regulate your own emotional world, you can be attuned
the emotions of others. ...
2. Be mindful of your strengths and weaknesses. ...
3. Stay focused. ...
4. Set boundaries. ...
5. Know your emotional triggers. ...
6. Embrace your intuition. ...
7. Practice self-discipline.
EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
AWARENESS OF THOUGHTS & SENSATIONS
AWARENESS OF STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSESS
STAYING FOCUSSED
SELF DISCIPLINE
Self-awareness in cognitive perspective which means adolescence must focus
attention outwards(observe his/her self on environment) towards the
environment (consciousness)
they must focus attention inwards (observe their self-awareness within
himself/herself)towards the self (self-awareness).
Firstly, from own angle(inner-self).
Secondly, from environment/ circumstance (outward self) angle one’s own
ideas ,concepts, assertive, creativity, extravert
they must do realize his/her own status, stability altruism, risk, leadership, weak
in life balance, these things helpful to become socially valuable person
conscious in sports, music and games these things helpful to become life
interested person.
realize their analytical, communication, technical,problem-solving, motivation,
decision making capacity, teamwork these thing helpful to become skilled
person
Life has offered me until now the privilege to meet and to observe people having
various status more or less important in this society. In these interactions, in my
mind it often appeared two questions: they are enough “interested” to have a
realistic self-perception? If, at a certain moment, they discover that they have a
utopian but positive self-perception will they make the effort to change it for the
real one no matter what?
For someone to reach and to keep a realistic self-perception is helpful to better
understand the types of the perceptions involved in. The real self-perception can
be “found” somewhere between our perception on us and others perception on us
because the objectivity is obtained from every one’s subjectivity.
No one knows us more than we do. The first notable element is our perception
on us based on our abilities to self-knowledge and also on our interior demands.
So, is necessary for every person to avoid not only high estimation but also the
low one to be able to distinguish a realistic self-perception from a utopian one.
This mean we have to maintain our self-appreciation to the most reasonable level
even our tendency to present us in a positive light is tempting.
To get to know ourselves we can also make us of others perception on us. This
aspect depends not only on our abilities to make ourselves well-known by showing
relevant behaviors but also on other ones abilities to correctly decode the
observed attitudes. Sometimes an attitude could be incorrectly comprehended by
a social partner and therefore any of us has to make sure his “message” is totally
understood.
As we know the social has a major influence on our behaviors and perceptions and
it’s like a marker for us. The psychologist L. Festinger explained in his social
comparison theory that we elaborate our perception on us by comparing our own
abilities and attitudes with other one’s, by evaluating our own opinions depending
on what the others think.
Living in a society it’s “forcing” us to participate to this comparison process, but in
the same time it puts us in a vulnerable position by being all day under external
influences which increase internal psychical pressure. The influence we talk about
is also revealed by the “looking glass self” concept of the psychologist C.H.
Cooley. According to him we think about how we appear to others, how they
consider our appearance and of course about the pride or shame we feel as a
result of an interaction.
So, someone next to you can induce yourself a positive or negative utopian self-
perception from different reasons. Think about this situation: you are constantly
hearing appreciations like “you are so intelligent /so beautiful” or the reverse “you
are so stupid /so not so beautiful”. Even some of these remarks are not real you
could end up believing it. In cases like this, if you are a responsible person, either
you honestly introspect yourself looking for the truth or you pay more attention to
what other people around you has to say.
Getting back to my initial questions, not all of us are willing to give up on an
idealistic self-perception even it affects us by believing in something that’s not
real. A positive self-perception even unrealistic is flattering for our ego and that is
more difficult to give it up for the real one when we have a high self-esteem level
and a social position and an image to protect.
Personally, I consider it’s healthier for our long-term mental evolution to know the
real us, our skills and our limits too, even truth doesn’t always give us a
psychological comfort. We owe ourselves to find out who we really are and never
to consciously fool ourselves for immediate goals or for gaining someone else’s
pleasing opinion. – Psychologist, Nicoleta Cramaruc
Self-concept is defined as an individual's belief and evaluation about
himself or herself. Included in this definition are one's beliefs about
attributes (both physical and mental), likes and dislikes, and strengths and
weaknesses.
Behaviors of Others
As director of research at a public policy center that studies adolescent risk-taking, I study teenage
brains and teenage behavior. Recently, my colleagues and I reviewed years of scientific
literature about adolescent brain development and risky behavior.
ADVERTISEMENT
We found that much of the risk behavior attributed to adolescents is not the result of an out-of-control
brain. As it turns out, the evidence supports an alternative interpretation: Risky behavior is a normal
part of development and reflects a biologically driven need for exploration – a process aimed at
acquiring experience and preparing teens for the complex decisions they will need to make as adults.
Stereotypes of adolescence
We often characterize adolescents as impulsive, reckless and emotionally unstable. We used to
attribute this behavior to “raging hormones.” More recently, it’s been popular in some
scientific circles to explain adolescent behavior as the result of an imbalance in the development of the
brain.
According to this theory, the prefrontal cortex, the center of the brain’s cognitive-control system,
matures more slowly than the limbic system, which governs desires and appetites including drives for
food and sex. This creates an imbalance in the adolescent brain that leads to even more impulsive and
risky behavior than seen in children – or so the theory goes.
This idea has gained currency to the point where it’s become common to refer to the “teenage brain” as
the source of the injuries and other maladies that arise during adolescence.
ADVERTISEMENT
In my view, the most striking failure of the teen brain hypothesis is its conflating of important
differences between different kinds of risky behavior, only a fraction of which support the notion of
the impulsive, unbridled adolescent.
Adolescents as explorers
What clearly peaks in adolescence is an interest in exploration and novelty seeking. Adolescents are by
necessity engaged in exploring essential questions about themselves – who they are, what skills they
have and who among their peers is worth socializing with.
But these explorations are not necessarily conducted impulsively. Rising levels of dopamine in the
brain during adolescence appear to drive an increased attraction to novel and exciting experiences. Yet
this “sensation seeking” behavior is also accompanied by increasing levels of cognitive control that
peak at the same age as adolescents’ drive for exploration. This ability to exert cognitive control peaks
well before structural brain maturation, which peaks at about age 25.
Researchers who attribute this exploratory behavior to recklessness are more likely falling prey to
stereotypes about adolescents than assessing what actually motivates their behavior.
ADVERTISEMENT
If adolescents were truly reckless, they should show a tendency toward risk-taking even when the risks
of bad outcomes are known. But they don’t. In experiments where the probabilities of their risks are
known, adolescents take fewer risks than children.
In experiments that mimic the well-known marshmallow test, in which waiting for a bigger reward is a
sign of self-control, adolescents are less impulsive than children and only slightly more so than adults.
While these forms of decision-making may place adolescents at a somewhat greater risk of adverse
outcomes than adults, the change in this form of self control from mid-adolescence to adulthood is
rather small and individual differences are great.
There is a specific kind of risk-taking that resembles the imbalance that the brain-development theory
points to. It is a form of impulsivity that is insensitive to risk due to acting without thinking. In this
form of impulsivity, the excitement of impulsive urges overshadows the potential to learn from bad
experience. For example, persons with this form of impulsivity have trouble controlling their use of
drugs, something that others learn to do when they have unpleasant experiences after using a drug.
Youth with this characteristic often display this tendency early in childhood, and it can become
heightened during adolescence. These teens do in fact run a much greater risk of injury and other
adverse outcomes.
But it is important to realize that this is characteristic of only a subset of youth with weak ability to
control their behavior. Although the rise in injurious and other risky behavior among teens is cause for
concern, this represents much more of a rise in the incidence of this behavior than of its prevalence. In
other words, while this risky behavior occurs more frequently among teens than children, it is by no
means common. The majority of adolescents do not die in car crashes, become victims of homicide or
suicide, experience major depression, become addicted to drugs or contract sexually transmitted
infections.
ADVERTISEMENT
Furthermore, the risks of these outcomes among a small segment of adolescents are often evident
much earlier, as children, when impulse control problems start to appear.
A dispassionate review of existing research suggests that what adolescents lack is not so much the
ability to control their behavior, but the wisdom that adults gain through experience. This takes time
and, without it, adolescents and young adults who are still exploring will make mistakes. But these are
honest mistakes, so to speak, because for most teens, they do not result from a lack of control.
This realisation is not so new, but it serves to place the recent neuroscience of brain development in
perspective. It is because adolescents are immature in regard to experience that makes them vulnerable
to mishaps. And for those with weak cognitive control, the risks are even greater. But we should not let
stereotypes of this immaturity color our interpretation of what they are doing. Teenagers are just
learning to be adults, and this inevitably involves a certain degree of risk.