Contract Management
Contract Management
Joshua Reddaway
Director, Commercial and Contracting VFM
[email protected]
020 7798 7938
The National Audit Office team for this work consisted of:
Andrew Denney, Iain Forrester, Catriona Sheil, Fedra Vanhuyse,
David Wilson, and Emma Willson, under the direction of
Joshua Reddaway.
This interactive publication draws on What is this? As government has reacted to these
scandals, it has also come to appreciate
Who is it for?
In this publication we set out our insights We have aimed our Commercial and
our audits of government contracts on some of the areas where contracts
the need to improve its commercial
capability and the value of managing
contract management – insights and
go wrong, the warning signs that we look emerging best practice at public sector
and engagement with government for, and the examples of emerging good
its contracts properly.
leaders responsible for commercial
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
The public The public sector spends £242 billion a year with private and voluntary sector suppliers
sector spends
£242 billion a
year with private
The public sector spends more money on Largest categories of public sector spending 2014-15
and voluntary contracts than it spends on providing services
sector suppliers itself. During 2014‑15 it spent £242 billion (31% of
total government spending) on external suppliers,
Government
relies on compared with £194 billion on staff costs.
suppliers across Suppliers now play a significant role across
a range of areas the public sector. They carry out government
work including complex projects, back-office £734 billion
Government Expenditure
is improving administration and public-facing services.
contract
management on Government’s large contracts include:
three levels
• HM Revenue & Customs’ information,
communication and technology services contract,
known as ‘Aspire’ (£11 billion total contract cost)
3
Overview
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
1 of 2
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
£50
relies on arm’s‑length bodies devolved spending
suppliers across
a range of areas COUNCIL
Government
is improving
contract
management on
billion
three levels £61 billion £43 billion £12 billion £69 billion £7 billion Capital spending is not separated
out by sector in the Whole of
Government Accounts
4
Overview
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
2 of 2
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
5
Overview
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
6
Overview
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
Identifying Identifying emerging best practice for individual contracts throughout the commercial lifecycle
emerging
best practice
for individual
Over the last 15 years we have assessed This publication Commercial and contract management: insights and emerging best practice,
contracts more than 140 contracts or portfolios identifies what we have seen work well and less well across contracts. It builds on our previous
throughout the reports and discussions with government to provide our thoughts on emerging best practice on
of contracts in detail. Through this
commercial 20 issues across seven areas that we believe need to be improved. We illustrate emerging best
lifecycle
work, and broader discussions with
practice where we have seen something work, or have identified suggestions on how to make
government, we have identified a things work better. Each of our 20 insights section shows:
We used number of recurring issues.
contracts and • what we have seen and heard through illustrative case studies based on our previous work;
workshops
• some emerging best practice and our insights on the way forward;
Our 26 most • some of the audit questions for assessing the value for money of commercial relationships; and
recent reports
on commercial • links to some of the wider guidance that may support government.
and contracting
issues
Fit of Commercial and contract management: insights and emerging best practice with our wider work
Contract level What do we look at? What should government do? What have we found?
NAO contract relationship For example: NAO Good practice Commercial and contract
audit framework contract management framework management – insights and This document
emerging best practice
Through a set of audit questions, Outlines contract management
helps evaluate management activities. Includes how to evaluate Draws on our work across
of commercial relations on a risk and opportunities and develop government to identify what we
consistent basis to decide whether contract management plans. have found and the emerging best
they lead to value for money. practice for individual contracts.
In early 2016, we published an overview of commercial and contracting in government outlining our focus for the next few years: government’s commercial capability; managing contracted‑out service delivery; accountability
and transparency; managing markets for public services; government as one customer; and new commercial models. This overview focused on overarching government and organisational level issues rather than the contract
focus we take with our insight and emerging best practice.
7
Overview
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
Cabinet Office 2 21
Cross-government 19
Post termination
Non-departmental 31 During contract
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Prior to contract signature
8
Overview
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
We used
contracts and
workshops Universal Credit: progress update (2014) Contracted-out health and disability General Practice Extraction Service (2016) E-Borders and successor programmes (2015)
assessments (2016)
The Work Programme (2016) Electronic monitoring contracts (2013) The rural broadband programme (2013)
Our 26 most High Speed 2 (2016)
Investigation into the UKTI specialist
Military flying training (2015) Hinchingbrooke Health Care NHS Trust (2012)
recent reports services contract (2016)
on commercial Shared service centres (2016) InterCity West Coast (2012) Out-of-hours GP services in England (2014)
Transforming Rehabilitation (2016)
and contracting Procuring new trains (2014)
issues
The Emergency Services Network (2016) COMPASS contracts for the provision of Language services contract (2014)
accommodation for asylum seekers (2014)
Army 2020 (2014) Managing and replacing the Aspire contract
UnitingCare Partnership (2015) (2014, 2016)
Open-book accounting and supply‑chain
assurance (2015)
9
Overview
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
1 of 2
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
10
Overview
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
2 of 2
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
11
Overview
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
INSIGHT 1 INSIGHT 2 Navigation Home INSIGHT 1 INSIGHT 2 Navigation Home INSIGHT 1 INSIGHT 2 Navigation Home
Make time to develop strategy Make time to develop strategy Make time to develop strategy
A standardised
Properly develop strategy Commercial
strategy
Properly develop strategy Commercial
strategy
Properly develop strategy Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial 1 Commercial
capability 1 Commercial
capability
capability Transition Transition
Transition & termination & termination
& termination
7 2 7 2 7 2
6 3 6 3 Market
6 3 Market
Market management management
management Contract & sourcing Contract & sourcing
Contract & sourcing lifecycle lifecycle
lifecycle
5 4 5 4 5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
format 1 Make time to develop strategy – If time is not invested early in developing a strategy, the foundation for success will not be in place On understanding the relationship between
programme and commercial planning
On the time for
commercial planning
NAO audit framework ? Examples of relevant guidance ?
We believe that many, and pehaps most, of the problems we see across commercial and contracting activities result from a failure to plan how best to achieve
NAO good practice contract management framework
operational requirements through commercial arrangements. In other words, departments jump to buying without developing a full commercial strategy. Our 2014 report on procuring new trains recommended that the The Department for Work & Pensions’
Case Supporting Commercial strategy
The government needs to plan so it can understand and articulate what it wants, and how to achieve this. Planning forms the basis for core activities such as Department for Transport improve its planning of major procurements. Work Programme (2014 report), a scheme to help 1.1 There is a planned transition from tendering/contract award to
studies information
developing an approach to the market, the service specification and contractual approach; sets the tone for contractual relations; and identifies risks. Government We also highlighted a need to better understand project requirements long‑term unemployed people to find and keep jobs, contract management. The cost of contract management is
requirements for a strategic outline business case include developing a commercial case. If this is not done well, the lack of a clear direction for the programme will before fixing a timetable and starting the tender process. We found that was introduced quickly with limited time for commercial included in the business case and budgets.
lead to challenges for commercial planning. a lack of clarity over the wider strategy undermined the department’s planning. During the early months, suppliers continued
1. Is there an overarching commercial strategy, with a
1.3 There are well defined processes and a clear contract
commercial strategy and led to a perceived gap between the to establish their operations and were unable to clear rationale and linkage to organisational strategy,
management plan, with a focus on outputs and a ‘whole life’
Warning indicators ? Emerging best practice Department’s stated commercial strategy and how it acted. Greater fulfil minimum service standards. We found that the and which targets VFM? approach to performance.
clarity would help the industry make plans and reduce costs. contractual performance measures set up by the 1.1 Is there a clear and consistently held view of what the contract is Government’s guide to assessing business cases sets out expectations
Department were flawed, because of a lack of planning producing, the type of commercial relationship desired, the basic
The shared service programme (2016 report) planned to bring for business cases, including the strategic and commercial case. The
A lack of clarity, for example Take time Engage Consider Use and initial performance expectations being set too high. contract structure and how it will be managed?
between programme and back‑office services together across many departments into two shared commercial case should answer whether “the proposed solution can
commercial approaches, about centres. We found that when it launched the programme in 2013, the be effectively delivered through a workable commercial deal or deals?”.
1.2 Has there been an assessment of strategic drivers, including policy
what is wanted, leading to Cabinet Office did not develop an integrated programme business As such, the proposed solution, and how it may be impacted by
drivers, and the internal and external environment?
differing interpretations case that consolidated the cases for each shared service centre and all commercial considerations needs to be clear.
and tension. potential customer departments. The lack of an integrated programme 1.3 Has the commercial strategy been based upon the assessment
strategy meant that there was no clear overall commercial strategy, of strategic drivers and the internal and external environment?
Insufficient engagement with responsibility for different aspects held by different departments.
with users and the market This contributed to delays and relationship issues between departments
to understand what can be Start planning before the procurement To understand possibilities and risks, Based on the information gathered Use the agreed strategy to shape the later in the programme, which ultimately meant that the contracts had
delivered and, for example, how options are put together, and update engage with: through engaging with markets, approach, contract and relationship. to be renegotiated.
contracts should be shaped. plans continually through the lifetime users and stakeholders consider all Be clear about what the contract is
of a contract. The time needed to • the market, to discuss appetite,
the commercial options and decide and is not trying to achieve.
feasibility and options;
develop commercial strategies will which option best fits the business
15 16 17
12
Overview
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
Framed around our commercial relationship lifecycle, we have identified 20 issues for government to
think about
Commercial strategy Contract management
1 Make time to develop strategy 13 Manage your own obligations
13
Overview
Navigation Home
Why is commercial and What are we doing? How to use The commercial What does our emerging best
Commercial
strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
contract management this document relationship lifecycle practice mean for departments Contract
6 3 Market
management
& sourcing
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
What does our emerging best practice mean for departments and government?
While focusing on individual
Government themes Organisational themes
contracts, our 20 insights of
emerging best practice bring
out themes that should be
considered more strategically Data-led approach. Since our 2014 contract Governance. Since 2013 we have seen departments
management report, government has improved the data attempt to make significant improvements to their
at a government and it holds about contracts and suppliers. But it has some commercial governance. Throughout our insights, we
organisational level. way to go in establishing benchmarks and sharing information highlight the significant role played by business owners. They have
across departments. Our emerging best practice reinforces the a role to play in developing a strategy continuing through to
need for a data-led approach, including around government being ensuring that the right outcomes are achieved. We have also
a more ‘intelligent client’; knowing in more detail what suppliers highlighted the need for staff to be supported by an organisation
are doing; and gaining a collective, ongoing understanding of the that works. Organisational structures need to be clear and
market and its available options. effective at entity-level to be able to flow down into the processes
for individual contracts.
Trusted advisor role. The Cabinet Office is continuing
to develop the commercial profession. It continues to Portfolio management. Departments segment their
encourage commercial teams to promote best practice contract portfolio according to risk, although the
rather than purely enforce procurement regulations. Emerging best sophistication of their approaches varies. Segmentation
practice on the importance of getting the right commercial strategy needs to be right given its importance to tailoring contract
in place, and how commercial and operational teams can work resources and understanding what suppliers are doing.
together from initial consideration of commercial options through Departments should maintain a comprehensive view of current
to preparing for termination, shows why this needs to be and future contracts so they can actively manage their full
significantly improved. commercial risk.
14
1 Commercial strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
1 Make time to develop strategy – If time is not invested early in developing a strategy, the foundation for success will not be in place
We believe that many, and pehaps most, of the problems we see across commercial and contracting activities result from a failure to plan how best to achieve
operational requirements through commercial arrangements. In other words, departments jump to buying without developing a full commercial strategy.
The government needs to plan so it can understand and articulate what it wants, and how to achieve this. Planning forms the basis for core activities such as
developing an approach to the market, the service specification and contractual approach; sets the tone for contractual relations; and identifies risks. Government
requirements for a strategic outline business case include developing a commercial case. If this is not done well, the lack of a clear direction for the programme will
lead to challenges for commercial planning.
Insufficient engagement
with users and the market
to understand what can be Start planning before the procurement To understand possibilities and risks, Based on the information gathered Use the agreed strategy to shape the
delivered and, for example, how options are put together, and update engage with: through engaging with markets, approach, contract and relationship.
contracts should be shaped. plans continually through the lifetime users and stakeholders consider all Be clear about what the contract is
of a contract. The time needed to • the market, to discuss appetite,
the commercial options and decide and is not trying to achieve.
feasibility and options;
develop commercial strategies will which option best fits the business
15
1 Commercial strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Case Our 2014 report on procuring new trains recommended that the The Department for Work & Pensions’
studies Department for Transport improve its planning of major procurements. Work Programme (2014 report), a scheme to help
We also highlighted a need to better understand project requirements long-term unemployed people to find and keep jobs,
before fixing a timetable and starting the tender process. We found that was introduced quickly with limited time for commercial
a lack of clarity over the wider strategy undermined the department’s planning. During the early months, suppliers continued
commercial strategy and led to a perceived gap between the to establish their operations and were unable to
Department’s stated commercial strategy and how it acted. Greater fulfil minimum service standards. We found that the
clarity would help the industry make plans and reduce costs. contractual performance measures set up by the
Department were flawed, because of a lack of planning
The shared service programme (2016 report) planned to bring
and initial performance expectations being set too high.
back‑office services together across many departments into two shared
centres. We found that when it launched the programme in 2013, the
Cabinet Office did not develop an integrated programme business
case that consolidated the cases for each shared service centre and all
potential customer departments. The lack of an integrated programme
strategy meant that there was no clear overall commercial strategy,
with responsibility for different aspects held by different departments.
This contributed to delays and relationship issues between departments
later in the programme, which ultimately meant that the contracts had
to be renegotiated.
16
1 Commercial strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
17
1 Commercial strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
When we are given a ‘commercial strategy’ as part of our audit, we rarely see commercial options fully considered and there is often a lack of realism
of what can be achieved. To avoid setting itself up to fail, government needs to use commercial strategies to outline why and how it is going to conduct
commercial relationships and what it wants to get from these relationships. This will prevent it from relying on generic procurement approaches with little
tailoring to the specifics of the contract. Although we have found examples of where teams have adequately considered trade-offs between priorities, we
often find that ‘strategies’ do not tackle some of the core issues that need to be considered.
Warning indicators ? Emerging best practice Components we have seen in the most convincing commercial strategies include:
18
1 Commercial strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
19
1 Commercial strategy
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
20
2 Commercial capability
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
3 Tailor capability to risks and opportunities – Resources must be focused on contracts where they can be used most effectively
We are often asked what commercial and contract management resources should be devoted to individual contracts. Ideally, government would be able
to resource everything it needs, but insufficient overall capacity often means it cannot. Government thus needs to ensure that resources are allocated
where they are needed most and where they can achieve the most impact. This is made harder by the lack of robust benchmarks for determining the
appropriate level of commercial and contract management resources.
Organisation perspective
A lack of planning Organisational and contract
perspectives need to be Identify how contract fits with wider portfolio of contracts
to tailor resources
to contract risks. considered in establishing a Understand sum of staffing requirements across strategically important contracts
staffing model Consider organisational return on investment and wider
opportunity costs of staffing decisions
Contracts understaffed Set out capability ‘blueprints’ to show how they will meet their commercial needs.
at key stages as skills and (Committee of Public Accounts, update on transforming contract management, 2016)
staffing requirements
shift throughout Contract staffing model
the contract. Developed early, regularly reviewed, unique to contract, differs by contract stage
Contract perspective
A lack of analysis,
such as return on investment, Identify return on investment on staff spending
21
2 Commercial capability
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Case Our 2016 report contracted-out health and disability The Committee of Public Accounts reported that there was an insufficient focus across
studies assessments found that the Department for Work government on contract management once a deal had been signed (update on transforming
& Pensions had invested heavily in its performance contract management, 2016). More specifically, we found that there were insufficient staff
management team which it increased from 48 people working on the contract at different stages:
to 80 over two years. However, we recommended
the Department tailor its resources to future risks. It • We found most bidders to be positive about their dialogue with the Ministry of Justice when
bidding for transforming rehabilitation (2016 report) contracts but teams had appeared
recognised that having insufficient skills and expertise
stretched in dealing with so many bidders, increasing the risks connected with the process.
remained a major risk.
22
2 Commercial capability
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
23
2 Commercial capability
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
4 Clarify commercial and operational balance – Confused responsibilities and poor knowledge-transfer weaken contract management
Integrating commercial teams with policy, operational and business teams is one of the biggest challenges for public sector contracts. Commercial and
policy, operational and business teams need to work together to develop a clear understanding of the outcomes required and how a contract will deliver
these. Organisations are at different stages in both bringing together these functions and handling the transfer of knowledge and responsibility between
teams. We remain unconvinced that anyone has cracked how to do this fully. At an organisational level, some government departments have tried to
do things differently, with business areas taking more ownership of the process.
Plan Resource: Give the right people the Manage: handovers Continuity
right levers and interfaces
Unclear roles and responsibilities,
particularly in terms of the commercial
role which can range from ‘adviser’ Plan who should be involved and • Establish a clear overarching • Maintain clear • Monitor continuity and
to ‘owner’. when, thinking ahead about risks and commercial governance framework documentation. add retention incentives
opportunities for each lifecycle stage. for the department with an as required.
appointed senior leader who • Manage handovers
Operational contract managers not • Confirm the role of the commercial is regularly challenged around
from procurement • Establish transition
function and other experts at each to operations; and protocols for when staff in
having the capacity to understand commercial delivery effectiveness.
stage. then the interface senior positions leave.
and perform their role and get
the best from the contract. • Ensure that those involved in between commercial and
• Produce clear documentation contracting have adequate operations.
outlining roles and responsibilities, skills, knowledge and proven
such as a statement of ownership. competency for their roles.
Ineffective and poorly managed
handovers and transition of knowledge • Blueprint resourcing strategy • Make sure that people understand
and skills across the lifecycle as roles achieved. their role and have sufficient training
change. and support.
• Procedures that validate the delivery
of contract management plans. • Draw on commercial and other
High levels of senior staff turnover create business expertise as required.
challenges for transferring knowledge
and expertise. • Give identified owners enough
control and levers to carry out their
role effectively.
24
2 Commercial capability
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Case studies On aligning commercial and business expertise On disconnect between commercial and
operational activities
On effective transition of knowledge and Recent reports recommended the need to clarify roles In our 2016 report on the Emergency Services
skills across the contract’s lifecycle and responsibilities, such as whether commercial should Network we thought that the commercial arrangements
act as advisers or take more ownership with support from in place created a risk that the emergency services
Our 2016 investigation into the UK Trade & operations. When managing contracts within operational did not have sufficient control over the service they
Investment’s specialist services contract found teams, managers need to be well-equipped and understand received. They did not have commercial levers over
that its governance of the procurement was weak, the the commercial levers to get the best from contracts. the full service received, limited contact with suppliers
procurement team had a poor understanding of the bid We have seen some good practice: across the end-to-end service, and no direct recourse
and requirement, and there was no effective handover to to suppliers for poor service. This reduces the benefits
the contract management team. UKTI ultimately decided National Offender Management Service – available from the new services.
to terminate the contract on the basis that it no longer Transforming Rehabilitation (2016 report)
considered the contract to represent value for money. We found in 2009 that the Department for Education’s
We found that operational contract managers are supported building schools for the future programme had a
The Department for Transport cancelled its franchise by analytical, finance and data assurance specialists that give shortage of the commercial and project management
competition for InterCity West Coast (2012 report), an improved view on contract performance. This is backed skills needed by local authorities to implement the
following technical concerns about the procurement up by operational assurance teams, which assess contract programme. Projects were delayed because of a lack of
process. We found no one person oversaw the compliance, data quality and service quality, including links capacity, reliance on consultants and continuity issues.
whole process, or could see patterns of emerging with other agencies. Inadequate attention was given to operational activities
problems, partly because of inconsistency in such as community consultation. We highlighted a
Department for Work & Pensions – Contracted-out health
committee membership and requirements. danger of benefits not being achieved without clear
and disability assessments (2016 report)
responsibilities, accountability and commitment.
The Major Project Authority’s reviews of E-Borders
The Department reorganised responsibilities so that each
(2015 report) found governance issues including unclear
contract has a senior contract owner and business partners
roles and responsibilities and prolonged disagreements
provide expertise and challenge financial reports. Dedicated
about critical issues. This was not helped by a lack
commercial teams within programmes are responsible
of continuity of key staff and programme reliance on
for commissioning commercial services and performance
suppliers for staffing.
management teams act as primary contacts for suppliers.
25
2 Commercial capability
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
2.3 Has the department deployed its capability in a balanced way Government Commercial Function – Government Commercial Operating
across the lifecycle and is commercial capability effectively Standards Iteration ii
integrated with the business? The level of commercial interim staffing in departments is optimised.
1.4
Ensuring strong and effective commercial engagement.
3.1
Commercial contract management competency.
7.3
26
2 Commercial capability
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
5 Maintain ‘organisational capability’ – Without effective governance and systems, even the most capable people will not succeed
Simply investing in skilled people will not be enough to ensure commercial success. The right people need to work within the right environment. This
includes having appropriate governance, systems, processes and data to make effective decisions. Team members need to know what is going on, the
levers at their disposal and how their actions affect the overall outcome required. This is an area where we have seen some of the biggest changes in
government departments over recent years, but no-one yet says they have a fully mature organisational model.
Insufficient data
and information being
available to make
informed decisions.
Data
IT and
Poorly established Governance systems processes Visibility
governance leading to
Put in place roles, responsibilities Develop and use systems that Make use of standard and Keep records with information and
unclear roles and and processes for monitoring, produce electronic invoices, record documented processes to manage dates relating to processes, contracts,
responsibilities and decision-making, ownership and cost and progress information in obligations, carry out procurement contract performance, and the pipeline
oversight from early in the contract a way that is consistent and easy processes in a lean and effective of forthcoming work. These should
ineffective oversight.
lifecycle. This includes establishing to analyse. This will allow closer way, and deal with changes or any be available to all those involved with
‘executive champions’ who report management of the contract with incidents or disputes. Collect and the contract and should feed into
to organisational committees less effort required. use information to make decisions the governance systems, including
Poor-quality information with oversight of the contractual across contracts, categories and the portfolio overviews, detailed above.
portfolio. Continuity should be organisation. See manage your own
and reporting systems and supported by back-up plans that obligations and properly evaluate bids
a lack of standardised document what staff need to know for more details of processes.
approaches to using data. and specific handover processes.
See ensure a shared understanding
for more examples.
27
2 Commercial capability
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
On establishing governance
Our 2016 investigation into the UKTI specialist services contract Our 2014 report, Transforming government’s contract management,
Case
studies found communication during procurement to be relatively informal. identified good practice across five levels of governance. In particular
Significant changes, such as to the volume and contract price, were we found that:
not consistently recorded. These governance shortfalls contributed
to control problems, leading to pricing disputes and the ultimate early • The Department for Work & Pensions commissioned an external review
to identify good practice in its day-to‑day contract management and
termination of the contract.
improve consistency.
In our 2014 report on the Army 2020 recruitment programme we
recommended that the Ministry of Defence should closely monitor the
• The Department of Health reviewed its data to make sure contract
ownership information was up-to-date and strengthened its guidance
effectiveness of its governance regime to oversee its supplier. Its failure
for senior responsible owners.
to effectively manage contracts contributed to delays in developing
the software required and increased costs. This led to poor results and • The Department for Work & Pensions improved escalation routes by
an inability to implement the performance management mechanism. ensuring that all contracts have senior responsible owners reporting to
staff in suitable procurement categories.
In 2013, government’s internal audit agency criticised governance
and accountability arrangements for the shared service centres • The Ministry of Justice established a new commercial and contract
programme. This led to difficulties in deciding on a design, which governance committee with a wider remit and greater seniority covering
contributed to delays. The Cabinet Office took steps to restructure current contracts as well as those yet to be signed.
governance and clarified roles. The governance was further
• The Crown Commercial Service’s complex transactions team provided
strengthened in 2016 to better enable shared decision-making.
central support to departments with contractual disputes.
28
2 Commercial capability
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
29
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
6 Be ‘an attractive client’ – Short-term or ill-considered decisions influence whether suppliers want to work with government
Government does not always behave as if suppliers have a choice whether to work with it or not. Suppliers need to know that they will get something
out of a contract and that they will receive a fair deal before they bid. We often find that government is keen to take short term tactical advantages over
contractors, and fails to think about the long-term impact of its decisions on suppliers and market sustainability.
Warning indicators ? We continue to have concerns about the Emerging best practice
level of competition in some vital areas of
public service delivered through providers
Doing things quickly – even where competition exists it can
puts at risk long‑terms often be a thin market. We have sometimes
Before During Later
commercial sustainability. seen departments disappointed by how
difficult it is to generate interest, bidders
withdrawing during procurement and
Not providing sufficient suppliers seeking to terminate contracts Market engagement Procurement Live running
information during procurement, early. Public sector requirements can Engage with the market Keep potential suppliers well Ensure as far as possible
suppliers do not know what act as a barrier for some suppliers – our on an ongoing basis to informed about the procurement that the contract proceeds
promote opportunities and and the project ahead. in a consistent and fair way.
they are getting themselves into. report on government’s spending with assess suppliers.
small and medium-sized enterprises found Consider the impact of Continue to think about
Give as much notice as procurement decisions on the wider implications of
that transparency, government’s appetite possible about future contract risk and profitability. any decisions.
Short sighted commercial
for risk and disproportionate bidding approaches and contracts
decisions contribute to unfair, (before developing strategy). Provide the information required
requirements created barriers for smaller and allow time for bidder
non-profitable contracts and
businesses. Larger suppliers also told us due diligence.
impact market sustainability.
they discriminate which contracts to bid for
in choosing potential work. They consider
Insufficient time allowed for how contracts fit with their expertise
supplier due diligence. and existing or potential work, alongside
balancing contract risk against profitability.
30
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
On ensuring fairness through procurement On ensuring contracts are profitable and set
reasonable expectations
Case Providing sufficient information throughout procurement allows bidders to know what they Contracts need to be profitable for suppliers to remain
studies are getting themselves into and minimise contractual risk, as well as supporting a fair and interested. In 2014, a supplier withdrew from providing
open contract. contracted-out health and disability assessments
(2016 report) for the Department for Work & Pensions
For the InterCity West Coast franchise (2012 report), the Department for Transport’s invitation
following concerns over the negative impact of
to tender contained significant gaps on how the Department would calculate any capital needed
the contract on claimants, its reputation, staff and
from bidders. There was considerable confusion among staff about the primary purpose of
profitability. The Department and suppliers recognise
the subordinated loan facility. Some bidders told us that when they asked for clarification on
that inconsistency in the approach to the contract,
issues, staff did not appear to know the answers and it often took some time before there was
inflexibility in setting terms and potential financial losses
clarification. We concluded that this contributed to cancelling of the West Coast procurement.
reduced the attractiveness of the contract.
For Transforming Rehabilitation (2016 report), the Ministry of Justice set out its commercial
The motivation of the Ministry of Defence’s supplier
strategy to bring new suppliers into the market, and put extensive effort into attracting a diverse
for military flying training (2015 report) to look for
range of potential bidders. While more than 700 private, public and third-sector organisations
cost reductions within the contract is likely to have
registered an interest, only one of its contracts was won by a supplier from outside the private
been affected by reductions in the overall value of
sector. Voluntary sector bidders were put off by the scale, fixed timetable and associated risks,
the programme to implement new core training as
and a lack of detail about the Ministry’s requirements for financial guarantees from bidders.
well as the structure of the incentivisation regime.
Our 2016 report on the UnitingCare Partnership contract found that bidders faced significant Its potential earnings reduced while its planning and
difficulties in pricing their bids accurately due to limitations in the available data. It was difficult to infrastructure costs have been largely unaffected by
determine accurately the volume, services to be provided and the costs of providing services, the changes. During the procurement of the Fixed
and bidders had to make large assumptions, with scope clarifications made late and in some Wing contract amendment two bidders withdrew
cases even after the contract was signed. from the competition, leaving one bidder, as they had
concerns about meeting the commercial and technical
requirements of the Request For Proposals.
31
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
32
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
1 of 2
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
7 Be ‘an intelligent client’ – Without understanding what is wanted and at what cost, government will not get the outcomes it wants
Far too often, we find that government does not understand what it means to buy and what this should cost, or what it has actually bought for the price
paid. Without this understanding, government exposes itself to a risk that it will not achieve its goals or that its contracts will be ineffective and inefficient.
In putting itself in the best position to negotiate or understand how contractual changes affect service and price, government needs to understand both
the specification and how the price offered by suppliers relates to its understanding of costs.
Misunderstanding of the
cost drivers and incentives
through, for example,
a lack of modelling.
33
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
2 of 2
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Cost Specification
Intelligent clients should maintain: Examples of how it can be used Intelligent clients:
Commercial • Decide whether to make or buy • Engage the market early to improve understanding of suppliers and
Strategy what can be delivered
• Divide large services into lots in a way that
helps competition • Make early discussions with the end user of the contract to
• A should-cost model understand the environment, constraints, requirements, risks
• Choose an appropriate pricing mechanism
and opportunities
• (proportionate to the complexity of
the service)
Commercial • Ensure the business has the ability to • Establish and keep in-house knowledge and use it to define
capability understand the cost-drivers and how they what is bought
can influence supplier behaviour
• Align operational requirements with commercial possibilities
Market management • A cost template for bidders to use • Evaluate bids consistently • Evaluate potential solutions on the market
& sourcing (consistent with the should-cost model)
• Compare costs between bids to help negotiate • Benchmark and challenge individual suppliers on potential
with the preferred bidder
Contract approach • A contract cost schedule (consistent • Ensure the contract is consistent with the • Are transparent through the procurement about requirements,
with should-cost model and identical to winning bid including any uncertainties and likely changes
winning bid)
• Create a contract which incentivises the supplier • Risk assess the likelihood of individual bids being able to meet
to optimise price and quality the expected scope
Contract • An invoice format that follows the • Ensure the invoice is consistent with the • Ensure that sufficient capacity is available for any required work with
management contract exactly contract before paying suppliers to refine specification and reduce uncertainties
Lifecycle • A contract cost schedule updated for any • Evaluate and price any changes consistently • Revisit requirements throughout the contract’s lifetime.
management agreed changes
• Forecast and manage budgets • Recognise where there are uncertainties and plan for where
changes are expected
• Benchmark against similar contracts and
the original bid
Transition & • A revised should-cost model, learning • Prepare for the end of the contract by updating • Put processes in place early to understand the service and how it
termination lessons from the contract, to be used for and refining the should-cost model could transition
the next contract
• Continue market engagement to keep options open
34
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Case Our 2015 report on the GP Extraction Service found that project In our 2016 investigation into UK Trade & Investment’s specialist
studies requirements were not initially set out in detail. When the NHS Information services contract we found that UKTI gave insufficient challenge
Centre (now NHS Digital) then needed to work with the client to produce to its supplier’s costings, bids and negotiations. For example, it did
detailed requirements, it had issues with high project manager turnover, not challenge when elements of the price that had previously been
reliance on contractors for expertise and not having sufficient capability for described as ‘fixed’ were changed, or when a new element was
requirement workshops. It found it difficult to agree detailed requirements. introduced to the pricing mechanism.
35
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
36
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
8 Properly evaluate bids – Evaluating the capability to deliver is just as important as evaluating what will be delivered
Government officials often say that they are good at ‘getting the bidding process right’. Very few procurements are legally challenged. But we have
recently seen a handful of examples where procurement has gone very wrong. And when it goes wrong it has a significant impact on value-for-money.
Furthermore, in our discussions, practitioners told us that they felt that the right bidder does not always win. In part this comes from the challenge of
assessing suppliers’ ability to deliver, rather than assessing competing promises of what they will deliver.
Competition structured in a
way that rules out desirable
bidders such as small
and medium enterprises. Clear business outcome agreed Consider past performance to the Assess the risk of a bid not being Determine a minimum standard
with the operational team at all levels extent procurement regulations allow. delivered in line with the specification in advance, with bids below this
of the organisation. A procurement policy note requires considering capabilities, ambition and not considered.
Evaluation criteria not aligning Clear criteria and measures linked
organisations to: satisfy themselves innovation, dependencies and risk,
Use a realistic ‘should cost’
to the outcomes required. that suppliers’ recent performance is and the supply chain.
to overall outcomes. model and expectations to create
in line with requirements; ensure that
Assess risks consistently through, for thresholds of acceptability.
Work out how this will this selection criteria on past performance
example, scenario testing.
be measured in the bid assessment. and related required information are
Bids evaluated on the basis specified in EU procurement notices; Consider potential timing of cash flows.
Require and assess a method
of promises rather than an obtain and where necessary verify the
statement and team diagram. information as part of applying selection
assessment of a capability to
criteria and pass on relevant information
deliver that promise. to the Crown Commercial Service.
37
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
On carrying out the On using evaluative criteria to get a supplier that can provide the desired outcome
procurement process
Case Our 2016 investigation into UK The Ministry of Justice’s evaluation of transforming The Home Office and HM Revenue & Customs told
studies Trade & Investment’s specialist rehabilitation (2016 report) bids considered both us that they have been developing a more intelligent
services contract found that it financial and qualitative criteria. To ensure that no approach to evaluating bids. This involved developing
breached good practice and the supplier captured more than 25% of the total market, its models to allow them to more effectively balance
principles of good procurement. approach allowed it to revert to the next-best bidder in the need for cost, quality, and efficiency; perform
The negotiations before contract four cases. This contributed to increasing the number sensitivity analysis; and understand what it meant
award gave the impression of of suppliers. when criteria changed.
UKTI not wanting to reopen the
The Crown Commercial Service told us that when In our 2014 report on procuring new trains, we
competition to other bidders by
it realised that only the incumbent supplier would bid recommended that the Department for Transport
awarding the official contract on
for new government travel contracts, it restarted the continue to consider train operating companies’ ability
one basis, while agreeing to act on
process using different criteria. This brought in more to work collaboratively with train manufacturers when it
another. Negotiating on key issues
small and medium enterprises. selects operators and drafts franchise agreements, to
after bids were submitted restricted
help reduce whole system costs.
competitive tension and exposing The Department for Culture, Media & Sport’s approach
it to a risk of significantly reduced to rural broadband contracts (2013 report) was When reporting in 2012 on Hinchingbrooke Health
value for money from the deal. less well developed. Given weak competition across Care NHS Trust, we found that the authority let
the rural broadband market, it developed a national bidders adjust the risk in their own proposals and could
procurement approach with local bodies agreeing not be sure it compared like with like when selecting
call-off contracts with suppliers. This reduced public its preferred bidder. This increased the risk of making
sector risk but also competition as the framework entry the wrong choice. We recommended that procuring
requirements favoured those with national capacity. authorities need to apply consistent risk adjustments
This led to one effective bidder – the incumbent – so bidders are treated equally and only realistic savings
winning all local contracts. opportunities are considered.
38
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
39
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
9 Keep up competitive tension – Competition need not just happen at the start – sustaining competitive tension throughout adds value
We believe that competition can be taken further than just focusing on ensuring that there are sufficient, credible bidders during procurement.
Competition is critical at the bid stage but this alone will not provide value for money. It is also desirable to keep-up competitive tension throughout the
contract. Organisations can also learn from others, such as defence, where single-source suppliers are common.
Over-reliance on initial
competition to maintain
Market engagement: Maximise engagement through Market engagement: Keep all bidders in the game Market engagement: Continue to keep the market
tension throughout the early and ongoing discussions and listening. Discuss as long as possible. warm to help sustain a credible set of possible
contract with, for example, prospects, inform the market of plans and use suppliers and benchmark performance. This keeps
Agree all core contract terms before signature.
a lack of consideration of knowledge to outline what is to be provided. Allow alive the threat of leaving a contract with alternatives
suppliers to influence, understand and prepare to bid kept open. Consider commercial trends and the
benchmarking and
for work. impact that shifting markets and technology has on
other ways of securing the relative power of suppliers and government.
Consider contract structure. There are opportunities
competitive pressure.
to be innovative. This could include competition Benchmark changes to the model and market and
between lots, formal benchmarking and allocation of understand thresholds for acceptable performance.
work depending on performance between suppliers.
Contracts being perpetually Take strategic decisions that balance, alongside
other factors, the need for competitive tension.
renewed as competition is
Reward good performance by, for example,
not considered or sustained
varying contract volumes between suppliers.
throughout a contract.
40
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
On maintaining competition We found good practice in the way that the Department HM Revenue and Customs successfully negotiated
throughout procurement for Work & Pensions set up its Work Programme cost savings on its Aspire contract (2014 report) in
(2014 report) contracts, where using two or three prime 2007 and 2009, but in doing so conceded safeguards
Our 2016 investigation into UK Trade & Investment’s
suppliers in each region helped sustain competitive designed to preserve competitive pressure. For
specialist services contract found that UKTI agreed
tension. The Department could shift referrals between example, it gave the Aspire suppliers greater exclusivity
to negotiate a significant change to the contract after
suppliers if performance differences exceeded a certain and suspended its right to benchmark services, thereby
bids were submitted and before the contract was
level. In addition, it could issue performance notices losing its ability to assess how well the suppliers
awarded. It was procuring the contract under the
‘restricted procedure’, whereby the contract should to prime contractor suppliers where performance were performing against commercial comparators.
be awarded on the basis of the bids provided by targets were not met. Eventually it could terminate Recognising their importance, it restored some of the
those invited to the competition and there should their contracts, with a range of experienced suppliers conditions that provided competitive tension in a further
have been no further negotiation. UKTI and its able to take their place. In practice, the benefits of this re-negotiation of the contract in 2012.
supplier did not formally record the outcomes of approach have not been fully realised as the contractual
negotiations. Restricting competitive tension exposed performance structure made it more expensive to
it to a risk of significantly reduced value for money terminate poorly performing suppliers.
On using alternatives to competition
from the deal.
In our 2016 report on nuclear power in the UK we
Our 2015 report on rail franchising recommended found that government paid low‑carbon generators the
that the Department for Transport develop Our 2015 open book report highlighted ways that the
difference between the price they receive for electricity
alternatives to its commercial approach to reduce the Ministry of Defence deals with single source contracts.
sold and a measure of the average market price for
risk to value for money in the event of market interest Where contracts are let without competition, it
electricity in the UK market. This would cover the gap if
and competition falling. This could involve introducing scrutinises suppliers’ costs, systems and overheads
the average price fell below the contract. These contracts
more negotiation and dialogue with bidders to a to check whether costs are in line with the contract
are designed to create competition between projects and
better deal. and to forecast the cost of defence equipment and
technologies as part of supporting awarding contracts
support. It collates supplier information to support this.
competitively and improving value for money.
41
3 Market management & sourcing
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
42
4 Contract approach
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
10 Ensure shared understanding – Misunderstanding of the contract and how it works creates confusion and tension
Far too often we find contracts that are unreadable, and misunderstandings about how they work or are priced, resulting in contract or service failures.
Government contracts deal with complex services, systems and infrastructure, but that does not mean they need to be made harder to read by poor
drafting, jargon and inconsistency. On the contrary, it makes it more important for contracts to be readable and easy to understand. Contracts provide
a foundation for building effective commercial relationships and need to be useable by people without legal training.
difficult to understand; Produce a ‘contract summary’ or define main terms that may sit alongside the contract.
this may introduce Drafting Use standardised contracts or standardised contract terms where ever possible, and
make clear where the contract has not used standard terms. This also allows more time
ambiguities and lead to
to be invested in developing specific contact terms that may be more complicated.
different interpretations.
Use worked examples to help explain how contract provisions work.
43
4 Contract approach
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
On standardisation In reviewing its electronic monitoring contracts Our 2016 investigation into the UKTI specialist
(2013 report) the Ministry of Justice discovered that services contract considered the UKTI’s
We have previously reported on how standardised NHS suppliers had been misreporting their performance, termination of a contract after a commercial dispute
private finance initiative contracts led to successful in part because they understood contractual terms over pricing. One reason behind the dispute was
hospital contracts for example in West Middlesex differently from the Ministry . This led to a dispute about that it was unclear how the contract was meant to
University Hospital (2002 report), by encouraging potential overcharging. Despite widespread reporting be priced, so UKTI was unable to understand the
improvements in value for money through the on this case we have since seen further issues with a commercial deal it had struck.
central renegotiation of terms and conditions. lack of clarity over contract terms.
In 2016, we investigated the collapse of the
HM Treasury has maintained standard contract terms Our 2015 report E-borders and successor UnitingCare Partnership, where an NHS contract
for private finance initiative (PFI) projects, and we programmes outlined varying interpretations of the was terminated after eight months as the supplier
see standard terms across the health and defence contract, in particular the underlying requirements. found it needed more funding than was available.
areas. However, most contracts we came across The Home Office incorporated the supplier’s proposed One month into the contract, the supplier asked for
are not standardised. The Ministry of Justice’s own design within the contract, but had not sufficiently 21% more revenue for the first year. The two sides
2013 contract management review identified aligned this with its own requirements. This resulted differed in their understanding of the extent to which
that it did not collect management information in a in disputes after contract award over whether contract clauses allowed the supplier to negotiate
standardised way – this was a factor in reducing the the proposal satisfied the Home Office’s needs, extra funding after signing the contract. Although
quality of information available. causing long delays. both parties negotiated to reduce the funding gap,
they were not able to reach a resolution.
44
4 Contract approach
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
4.1 Is there an appropriate allocation of risk The respective responsibilities of the contract manager and the supplier are clear,
4.2
between department and contractor? and potentially defined in a ‘joint statement of intent’ or similar document.
4.2 Are there incentives to encourage Procurement policy note – Information sharing in government procurement exercises
the contractor to act in the interest of Sets out the steps to take in the case of a commercial dispute settlement.
the department?
Model services contract and models for construction procurement
4.3 A
re suitable mechanisms established to (Crown Commercial Service)
drive the desired relationship? Government Commercial Function- Government Commercial Operating Standards Iteration ii
6.1 Greater accessibility and awareness of commercial terms.
45
4 Contract approach
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
11 Understand risks – Understanding and allocating risks appropriately remains fundamental in driving the right behaviours
Over the last few years, many of our disagreements with government relate to how it measures, understands and allocates contract risks. Inappropriate
allocation of risk has been a problem we have seen since our audits of the earliest government public-private partnerships. It continues to be the area
of most contention between the NAO and government in our audits of its largest contracts. Although the importance of risk is widely recognised across
government, we would be more convinced that it was well managed if we saw proper processes in place.
Not understanding
and quantifying risks
in advance.
46
4 Contract approach
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Case We found in 2013 that the Department for Culture, Media In 2008, the Ministry of Defence contracted a supplier to develop and manage a new
studies & Sport did not model the contractual risks of its rural approach to military flying training (2015 report). The provider was responsible for
broadband contract to decide whether the price paid for providing aircraft and simulators for training, running training courses, and training
the balance of risk was reasonable. It transferred much of an agreed number of aircrew each year. The Department retained responsibility
the downside risk to the supplier, such as increased costs for some aspects of the core training, which undermined its ability to fully hold the
and lower revenues, but also the upside risk of the supplier supplier to account for the activities it sought to transfer out. The risk to UK military
getting larger volumes than expected. Similarly, in the shared capability of not training enough aircrew to meet military needs ultimately rests with
service centres programme departments were able to delay the Department and cannot be transferred.
their moves as long as they were able to maintain their legacy
systems. The Cabinet Office argued that it had transferred On trying to transfer all risks
the financial risk of delays to the programme through its
contracts. However, neither the contractor nor the Cabinet
Office had the power to prevent delays, so this risk could not The ultimate risk (beyond whatever financial or reputational harm a company takes)
reasonably reside solely with the contractor. rests with government. In 2002, we reported that the Ministry of Defence, in relation to
its nuclear submarine facilities at Devonport, considered that it had transferred the
In our 2012 report on the first carbon capture and storage risk of cost overruns to the private sector. However, the Department ultimately funded
competition, we found that the Department of Energy & the cost overruns as it had nowhere else to go and needed to ensure the supplier
Climate Change did not have a clear strategy to address remained viable.
commercial risks. The Department requested frequent
external reviews which advised of significant risks. However, The franchising of Hinchingbrooke Health Care NHS Trust (2012 report) transferred
it continued without fully considering the cost implications demand risk and up to £5 million of financial risk to the provider. The NHS East
because the potential strategic benefits outweighed its of England Strategic Health Authority provided incentives for bidders to include
costs. We found that as expected costs increased the guaranteed payments by double-weighting these in the financial assessment. However,
project became unaffordable, and negotiations with the one it made no other changes to bidders’ projected savings to account for risk. This
remaining bidder were ended by the government. approach may have encouraged bidders to make overly-optimistic savings projections.
47
4 Contract approach
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
48
4 Contract approach
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
12Design performance measures that work – Without relevant and workable measures, business outcomes may fail or perverse incentives
may be created
We rarely see performance management mechanisms (which apply rewards or penalties, such as through key performance indicators) working as intended. Even where
normal processes have been followed, we have seen clients happy despite measures not being met and unhappy when they are. As a result, we need to question not
only whether the performance regime is right (does it incentivise the right behaviours, penalise poor performance and ensure that government gets what it wants?),
but also whether government knows what performance is and can manage contractors to get what it wants. We develop this point further in client leadership.
Existing guidance outlines formal approaches and processes to establishing, monitoring and evaluating performance. Determining the right measures, and
the right number of measures, to include in a contract is important, but needs to form part of a wider process:
A lack of alignment between
overall business outcomes
Get Focus on what matters Time should be invested to produce measures that flow from the strategy that outlines
and performance measures. measures expected outcomes – the key things that matter.
right Proportional The burden of work required, such as in obtaining information and monitoring, should not
outweigh benefits when considering the number of measures and access to robust data.
Measures that are
Clear Need advance agreement on the purpose, definition and measurement of each measure.
complicated, vague
Strong evidence base Evidence gives confidence that targets are achievable.
or ill thought through.
Review Where possible amend key performance indicators during a contract lifetime without altering the balance between risk and
Financial incentives linked to & update reward. Indicators that probably should be changed may include those where incentives linked to measures are too small
performance measures being to matter; that are not providing the right incentives; have insufficient information to monitor performance, or where the time
needed to monitor performance outweighs the benefits gained. A regular review allows government to consider whether
too small to have an impact.
indicators remain relevant.
Measures becoming out-of-date Use other A well-designed set of performance measures should motivate suppliers but they should be used alongside other
levers methods. See client leadership focuses on what matters and understand suppliers’ motivation.
during the contract.
49
4 Contract approach
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Case We have seen many cases of ineffective performance measures. Changes to performance measures during a contract have been rare
studies Our 2014 report on the Work Programme found that flawed but we have seen good practice:
measures meant the Department for Work & Pensions had to
make incentive payments to even the worst performing suppliers. • The Ministry of Defence told us that it considers reviewing key
performance indicators for each contract every year. As part of
We recommended that it should review whether different groups
this exercise, it reduced 140 key performance indicators to eight
need different minimum service standards; monitor minimum
on a facilities management contract after considering whether
service standards by group; and gather other standard measures of
the benefits of this change outweighed the costs and risks of
services. Also, our work on contracted‑out health and disability
the process. The Department told us that it is also looking to
assessments (2016) and on transforming rehabilitation (2016)
renegotiate a current estates management contract because the
highlighted the challenges in developing service level agreements
effort of measuring performance outweighs the benefit it gets
that measure quality and the need to understand the trade‑offs
from measurement.
between quality and other factors when setting the service level
agreements. It is important for the Department to gain good • On the Work Programme (2014 report), the Department for Work
information to be able to manage performance, incentivise & Pensions changed the way that it approached performance
providers and identify emerging risks. measurement two years into the scheme in response to the
difficulty of monitoring and enforcing minimum service standards.
It was able to get a better oversight of performance and provide
better incentives to suppliers as a result.
50
4 Contract approach
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
51
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
13 Manage your own obligations – Government must meet its own obligations for contracts to succeed
We often see government not fulfilling its own contractual obligations. Supplier performance can depend on government taking actions such as making
critical decisions, designing a process, projecting forecasts or providing assets such as IT systems. Not delivering on these government’s obligations can
lead to extra costs through projects being delayed or a limit to government’s ability to hold suppliers to account. Along with meeting its contractual
obligations, government needs to ensure it fully capitalises on the benefits a contract and a commercial relationship can bring.
Ambiguous responsibilities
and unclear obligations
leading to confusion. Contracts should
include a complete
schedule of
Set out obligations government obligations.
Poor management of multiple
stakeholder dependencies
through, for example,
lack of a project Carry the
management approach. obligation schedule through Use a project and
to the project, assigning programme management
milestones and responsibilities. approach to establish formal
processes for meeting
Not making the most of the Use a benefits realisation plan contractual and wider obligations.
to understand the wider value
potential for contracts and to be added. Devote resources to
commercial relationships to Project manage meeting each objective
Share the schedule with in the contract.
add value beyond the all relevant parties.
contract itself.
52
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Case We frequently see government failing to recognise interdependencies or • Failing to transfer risk as planned. Our 2010 report on PFI
studies meet its obligations, with a range of negative results, for example: hospitals found that hospital trusts had difficulty meeting their
obligations to allow suppliers to manage maintenance. This was
• Extra costs and delay. The Ministry of Defence contracted a
because they needed to vacate hospital wards for maintenance
supplier to recruit enough suitable personnel for its Army 2020
to be carried out. Because they did not always allow scheduled
(2014 report) structure. The supplier’s performance, agreed in its
maintenance, trusts found themselves accepting the maintenance
contract, depended on the Department providing supporting ICT
risk, despite having paid for the risk to be transferred.
infrastructure for their new recruitment software by an agreed date.
The Department did not provide this infrastructure which meant • Complexity. The Cabinet Office’s shared service centres
the supplier could not run the recruitment process as planned. (2016 report) programme relied on the different customer
It had to fund extra costs to support manual workarounds, which departments and organisations agreeing the specification of new
were likely to total some £25 million. The Home Office’s E-borders software. Reaching an agreement took longer than expected which
(2015 report) supplier carried out initial design before designers were led to significant delays. Suppliers argued that government was
fully aware of the Department’s detailed requirements. Disputes responsible for some of the extra costs. Government and suppliers
arose because the supplier did not believe the Department had are in the process of renegotiating the contracts.
rights to change requirements after contract award, and this
• Failing to achieve benefits. For planned benefits from the new
resulted in programme delays.
emergency services network (2016 report) contract to be
• Understanding and challenging supplier performance. Our realised, major business change by the emergency services is
2015 report on military flying training found that the Ministry needed. Supporting the achievement of these benefits is not part
of Defence had difficulty holding the supplier to account for its of the programme’s scope and it was not clear who should take
performance partly because it was required to provide instructors responsibility for changing behaviour. Without a co-ordinated
itself. Because of issues with its own performance, the Department approach to add value, we found that the programme’s benefits
deducted little from payments because of its supplier failing to would likely be reduced.
meet its responsibilities despite considering performance to
have been poor.
53
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
54
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
14 Know what suppliers are doing – To manage a contract it is important to understand performance and costs
Government needs a ‘hands-on’ approach to understanding suppliers’ performance. It has been increasingly aware of the need to do this but can go
further. Assurance requires investment of both time and resources so government needs to think carefully about how to get the right approach.
We have seen both cases where there is not enough assurance over reporting and cases where there is too much compliance testing without it
being targeted effectively. Decisions need to be made, for example, on the balance of self-reporting with independent monitoring and of the use of
detailed controls testing with a proportionate approach.
A lack of transparency
about supplier data, despite
government’s transparency agenda.
A tendency to substantively All major contracts need a bespoke Government data is easier to assure Where suppliers self-report, A rolling programme of routine
test supplier information compliance programme aligned to but is not always feasible or efficient. government needs assurance. assurance could reduce the
rather than understanding the the risks of that contract. Controls assurance is often less need for compliance testing of
controls over the information. onerous, more efficient, improves all contracts.
Supply chain assurance strategies
understanding and can help indicate
should be set out early and included
broader concerns that need
in the contract management plan.
Challenges in understanding to be actioned.
the supply chain’s performance However controls testing requires
and resultant risks. more expertise to do properly.
55
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
On self-reporting versus supplier assurance On a controls based approach versus substantive testing
Case In our 2015 report on the provision of out‑of‑hours GP service Government can obtain assurance through substantive testing
studies in Cornwall we reported that supplier staff had made unauthorised or a controls-based approach. Our 2014 report Transforming
changes, which were inappropriate and lacked justification, to government’s contract management reported that the Cabinet
performance data. The Primary Care Trust relied on the supplier Office and Confederation of British Industry were producing a
self‑reporting and performance was overstated on multiple measures. set of principles to improve transparency. This led to the Institute
for Government recommending transparency to be included in
Our 2014 report on the Department for Work & Pensions’ Work
government contracts alongside existing confidentiality and freedom
Programme showed the merits of validating performance data,
of information clauses, in its report Enhancing transparency in public
in particular job outcome payments. The Department checks job
service contracts. We also described how the Department for Work
outcome claims and extrapolates rates of invalid claims to reduce
& Pensions required major suppliers to commission external reviews
payments to suppliers. The Department estimates that its approach
to receive independent assurance on performance and on their
has saved it £21 million up to March 2014. The validation regime
controls. This improved the Department’s level of assurance and
may also have deterred suppliers from claiming some job outcomes.
supported performance management.
It continues to improve its approach.
56
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
57
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
15 Show what you care about – Client leadership encourages emphasis on the right business outcomes
A shared understanding of outcomes between government and suppliers, and strong client leadership, can help to overcome poorly designed contracts
and the limitations of formal performance measures. Effective client leadership gives government an opportunity to keep suppliers focused on what really
matters to them and service users. Suppliers react to what clients pay attention to. They may even ignore contractual requirements if they believe that the
client is ignoring them, or go beyond the contract if they believe that it will win them merit with the client.
58
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Case The National Savings & Investments (NS&I) operational services The Ministry of Defence told us that some of its
studies contract with Atos has a range of key performance indicators covering contracts include a ‘reward fee’ where a share of
areas of the business, from accounting and complaint handling to call the agreed profit is awarded if the supplier has
centre and internet performance. NS&I can reduce the amount paid demonstrated some of the softer factors required in
to Atos where performance indicators are missed with deductions managing the contract. Using an agreed framework,
escalating if targets are repeatedly missed. However, instead of the Ministry of Defence will use its discretion in
automatically applying maximum deductions where an indicator is making payment. It has been positive about the
missed, NS&I prefers to discuss with Atos the circumstances of the benefits of this approach.
failure, waiving or reducing the deduction if they are satisfied with
the action taken. This protects the customer by ensuring the supplier
continues to focus on service quality and continuity in areas where a
key performance indicator target is likely to be missed.
59
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
5.2 Is the contractor providing a service in accordance with the Government Commercial Function- Government Commercial Operating
contract and are they actively managed by the department to Standards Iteration ii
meet or exceed requirements? 7.1 Contracts should deliver the outcomes anticipated.
60
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
16 Understand suppliers’ motivation – Use other levers to get the best from suppliers
Suppliers are normally motivated by maximising their profits on contracts but they are also motivated by other factors. The high-profile failure of public
service delivery can affect a supplier’s reputation. For example, it can affect their ability to win future work both with government and elsewhere, and
significantly affect their share price. However, government contracts can also offer suppliers public recognition and prestige, alongside opportunities
to fulfil wider values and objectives. Our work with suppliers has shown how important reputation is to them and how some manage this at least as
strongly as formal performance management mechanisms against contractual incentives.
Warning indicators ? Emerging best practice Factors influencing delivery include supplier values and reputation
Good contract managers realise that Provider control framework and culture
suppliers care for other things alongside
profit. This include reputation, values Goverance Visibility Values & Management Incentives
Not taking advantage and how staff are engaged and included. objectives focus & rewards
Alongside contractual performance
of suppliers’ reputation
measures, they use these insights to
management which we have influence suppliers’ performance and
seen built into internal get the best from suppliers. Compliance Working Inspection &
User feedback
monitoring relationships regulation
control frameworks. Government has begun to focus more
on ‘strategic relationship management’,
which could be used to capture and Performance
Client Service External
share insights more widely. management
leadership user reputation
Ignoring the ways mechanism
suppliers can use contracts
Long-term
and contract performance Performance
strategic Consultation Media
& reporting
to align with their own relationships
supplier values, objectives
and standards
for staff engagement. Service
61
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
On using transparency and reputational risk On using supplier values and objectives
Case In 2015, Sodexo and Mitie invited us to visit In 2015, Amey and Interserve invited us to visit the
studies the services they respectively run at HMP services they respectively run at the National Physical
Northumberland and the Heathrow Immigration Laboratory (NPL) and the Defence Training Estate.
Removal Centre. These highly regulated services This allowed us to see the impact of corporate
are subject to external inspections from Her Majesty’s objectives concerning reputation on the contract,
Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) and the Independent and the opportunities this raised for the client.
Monitoring Board, the findings of which are publicly
At NPL, contract managers could ‘trade-off’ service
reported. The performance of HMP Northumberland is
credit deductions for extra activity outside the scope
also reported in the Prisons Rating System alongside
of the contract. Amey developed an energy reduction
all other prisons. The suppliers acknowledged
plan that benefited the client while also aligning with
that this increased level of transparency brought a
Amey’s corporate objective to protect and enhance
reputational incentive to deliver a good service.
the environment.
62
5 Contract management
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
5.1 Do the department and the contractor have comprehensive Incentive structures (financial or non-financial) relate clearly to
6.5
knowledge of service performance? desired outcomes, and are well managed and governed, with
appropriate checks and approval mechanisms.
5.2 Is the contractor providing a service in accordance with the
contract and are they actively managed by the department to
meet or exceed requirements?
63
6 Contract lifecycle
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
17 Plan for uncertainties – Contracts become unworkable if they do not align to changing circumstances
Government works within a constantly evolving environment, which it can struggle to reflect in contracts. For many contracts, some uncertainty will
be expected when the contract is signed. Customer behaviours can be difficult to predict, public policies can change or requirements may need to
be refined where contracts introduce new processes and systems. The result is that poor contracts prove too inflexible, resulting in costly changes,
the contract failing to deliver what was intended or delivering the wrong thing. Where government plans for the need for flexibility upfront, it is much
better able to manage uncertainty.
64
6 Contract lifecycle
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
The Department for Work & Pensions introduced the Work Programme (2014 report) Our 2016 report on Transforming Rehabilitation
Case
studies quickly in 2011. The programme had a slow start and ramp-up. The Department recognised identified concerns about how uncertainties were
uncertainties within the programme and took a more active approach to changing its managed. Outsourcing immature businesses within
requirements and monitoring, including terminating some contracts, during the early stages. the wider context of a changing new probation
system increased the risk and made the programme
For the Yarl’s Wood Immigration Removal Centre (2016 report), some users’ needs were
less attractive. We recommended that departments
not being fully met. We recommended that when designing contractual arrangements,
outsourcing complex transformed services should
departments should consider including arrangements to assess users’ initial needs, and
consider how to mitigate or reduce risk and
any that develop while using the service. They should ensure that there are mechanisms for
uncertainty from concurrent changes, including
varying the contract or buying more services if necessary.
through phasing changes to occur at different times.
In our 2016 report on contracted-out health and disability assessments, we
recommended that the Department for Work & Pensions should set out realistic targets and
follow clear principles for challenging assumptions. Otherwise, there is a risk that bidders
will not be able to tell whether requirements are deliverable. We recommended that where
assumptions are uncertain, the Department should develop its principles for using ‘allowable
assumptions’ clauses and extend these beyond the initial stages of a contract.
65
6 Contract lifecycle
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
6.2 Are VFM mechanisms used to ensure the contract continues Government Commercial Function – Government Commercial Operating
to deliver VFM over its life? Standards Iteration ii
Contracts will outline agreement on the costs of potential
6.2
6.3 Is change controlled and well managed and does the contract
future options.
remain current?
6.5 Transition arrangements.
66
6 Contract lifecycle
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
18 Work towards business-as-usual requirements – A sufficient and effective transition period from procurement to live running is crucial
The critical importance of ‘mobilisation’ – the time between contract award and business as usual – is sometimes underestimated. This phase includes
supporting a smooth transition; time to set up good practice; and identifying potential contractual changes, problems and risks that may have a
subsequent impact. The early success of a contract depends on how quickly and efficiently government gets the contract up and running. Not getting
it right at this stage will set the tone for the rest of the contract, and could have serious consequences. Government’s commercial operating standards
recognise the importance of mobilisation as a specific phase to consider, monitor and assess.
Warning indicators ? Emerging best practice Mobilisation factors to consider would include:
Rushing mobilisation,
which has an impact
on performance.
67
6 Contract lifecycle
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Case Our 2016 investigation into the UnitingCare Mobilisation provides a further opportunity to agree
studies Partnership found that bidders highlighted an a clear specification, providing a foundation for the
insufficient amount of transformation funding and the contract. The Cabinet Office’s shared service centres
short mobilisation period allowed. The client told us programme (2016 report) did not secure sufficient
See also Transition
that it expected the supplier to invest its own funds early support from departments, which felt insufficiently
& termination
section for some to support service transformation, but this was not a involved in appointing suppliers and designing new
overlapping requirement in the contract. UnitingCare Partnership systems. Failing to get an early agreed design contributed
examples. told us that it disagreed with this expectation. to delays in implementing the programme.
68
6 Contract lifecycle
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
6.3 Is change controlled and well managed and does the contract Local Government Association – A Councillor’s Guide to Procurement
remain current? Covers critical success factors for contract management (p. 27 and 28).
Government Commercial Function – Government Commercial Operating
Standards Iteration ii
Departments will have a mechanism for tracking the deliverability
6.4
of mobilisation obligations.
69
7 Transition & termination
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
19 Think about contract end up front – A lack of upfront planning puts effective contract transfer at risk
Even before a contract is signed, government needs to be thinking about its end. We see termination rights vary in how they are stipulated and used,
and it is not always clear why. The questions we ask include – in what circumstances could a contract be terminated? Or extended? What can be
learned from the contract and how will this be captured? What information and data will be needed so that a subsequent supplier could take over?
New suppliers not having Ensure contracts are clear on contract-end options Ensure there are sufficient means to incentivise
access to sufficient information, Plan and timings, for example the right to terminate Plan the the supplier to maintain resources and
thoroughly wind-down
(which is valuable and should not be traded away performance right up to the end of the contract.
in particular from existing
unless the benefits received outweigh the loss
suppliers, to ensure incurred).
an effective transition. Ensure contracts are clear on transition
responsibilities, with detailed timings and
definitions of what should be delivered. Also,
Performance dipping where allow for modification/expansion of transition
arrangements through agreed contract Work out the information suppliers will need
suppliers begin to wind‑down review processes. Consider for transition, eg information on costs and
towards the end of a contract. Consider the risks of failure and different
information service volumes and asset registers.
approaches to the end of the contract. Set out how bidders will have sight of
Put in place contingency plans from early in all information they require from the
Not formally building in time the contract. incumbent supplier.
to learn from experiences.
70
7 Transition & termination
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Case We recommended in our 2014 report on the Department for Work & The Department for Transport is committed to continuously improving
studies Pensions’ Work Programme that the Department should develop its rail franchising programme (2015 report) and has embedded a
a clear approach to making any future termination decisions. After structured approach to learning lessons and responding to feedback
agreeing termination costs, the Department should evaluate the impact from operators and stakeholders. This includes:
of terminating a contract; set out clear principles for making future
termination decisions using break clauses in the current contracts; and • holding ‘lessons learned’ workshops after each franchise
competition.
include relative as well as better absolute measures of performance in
setting the conditions under which it could terminate contracts at no cost. • holding ‘bidder days’ to give bidders the opportunity to feed
back their experiences of the procurement process and make
suggestions for improving it.
Supporting supplier transition needs • reviewing the complexity and quantity of information it requires from
bidders in its financial models.
Our 2016 report on the Yarl’s Wood Immigration Removal Centre As a result, the Department has made changes to simplify and improve
found that services did not fully meet users’ needs. There was a the bidding process and encourage new entrants.
lack of clarity over each supplier’s responsibilities which took time to
become clear. We recommended that where multiple organisations
become responsible for providing a service, the departments involved
should agree on how to resolve issues, such as gaps between
contracts and interdependencies, before transition.
71
7 Transition & termination
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
• Learning lessons
72
7 Transition & termination
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
20 Allow time to consider potential end of contract – Not thinking early enough about the future beyond a contract increases risks
In not making decisions about reprocuring contracts early enough, government limits its options, leading to the status quo often being adopted. At this
point the contract lifecycle comes full circle – decisions on whether or not to end a contract need to consider the overarching commercial strategy and
wider market considerations. It takes time to consider these implications. Not allowing enough time weakens government’s negotiating position and
stifles opportunities for innovation or securing value for money. Government needs to make early thinking part of a routine process.
Reluctance to use
processes for dealing with Take action to prepare for and carry out transition
provider failure. (eg time and resources, plan dependencies and collect information)
73
7 Transition & termination
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
Case Our 2016 report on contracted-out health and Our 2015 report paper on managing provider The Ministry of Justice completed
studies disability assessments praised the Department failure set out options for managing failure and how a lessons learned exercise on its
for Work & Pensions and suppliers on the transition adopting either a market-focused or provider‑focused language services contract,
of health assessment provision from one supplier to approach reflects different appetites for failure. (2014 report) reviewing lessons to
See also contract
another. However, we still found that the Department We reported seeing many instances where ensure that they would be taken
lifecycle section for
some overlapping needs to prepare for transition earlier and had done government has set up failure regimes but few into account in future contracts. In
examples. limited preparatory work for contract transition. occasions where it has allowed suppliers to actually particular, the Department reviewed
fail. To manage markets and suppliers it is important the use of management information
We reported in 2016 that HM Revenue & Customs
for government to follow through with its planned for new policies. It conducted a
had set out a phased approach to replacing its
processes for failure. separate review of governance that
Aspire contract to manage commercial and technical
led to the Department strengthening
risk and give it more time to smoothly exit from the
its governance, including its
contract. This followed findings in our 2014 report
approvals and assurance processes.
that the Department had yet to develop a formal
business case and overall project plan. It was left
with much to achieve in little time.
74
7 Transition & termination
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
6 3 Market
management
Contract & sourcing
lifecycle
5 4
Overview > Warning indicators > Emerging best practice > Case studies > Supporting information Contract
management
Contract
approach
75
Appendices
Navigation Home
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
1 of 2
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
Glossary
Key terms Other definitions
• commercial and contract management refers to the wider Benchmarking Comparative exercise using other similar services/contracts
process of managing a contract across a project’s lifecycle. as a way of assessing price or performance.
Business case The justification for a project based on its rationale, risk, cost
• procurement process refers to the process of identifying a
and benefits.
supplier of a good or service and then arranging a contract,
including the tendering and any competition and negotiation. Business owner The front-line manager with responsibility for a contract or
element of a contract.
risks related to a contract and its performance, compliance risk Contract Plan for how to manage a contract which sets out resources,
as the risk of consequences of failing to follow expected standards, management plan risks and the various contract management activities that will
be carried out.
and risk allocation to mean the proportioning of contract risk
between different parties. Control test Checks performed to verify whether internal controls
are working.
76
Appendices
Navigation Home
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
2 of 2
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
Glossary continued
Term Definition Term Definition
Framework An agreement with suppliers to establish terms governing Segmentation Identifying different types of contract, for example by size or
contracts that may be awarded during the life of the agreement. risk, to manage them in different ways.
KPIs A series of measures against which performance on a contract Sensitivity analysis The study of how the uncertainty in an output can be
(Key Performance can be judged, which should incentivise good performance and apportioned to different sources of uncertainty in its inputs.
Indicators) penalise poor performance.
Service Credit Mechanism for reducing payments if supplier performance fails
Market engagement The process of identifying potential suppliers and discussing to meet expected standards.
contracts or potential contracts with them.
Service Level Agreement on the levels of performance expected, which can
OJEU notice Official Journal of the European Union (EU) notice – publication Agreement (SLA) be used to decide service credits and other incentives.
that lets potential suppliers know of a procurement process
under EU rules. Should-cost model Model which allows an estimation of the expected cost of
goods or services to use as a comparator for bids received or
Open book A type of supply chain assurance wherein the supplier makes actual costs.
more of their contractual and financial information available.
Sourcing Process of finding, evaluating and engaging potential suppliers
Partnering Development of successful, long term, strategic relationships about an upcoming opportunity.
between customers and suppliers, based on achieving
best practice. SRO Senior Responsible Owner with the ultimate responsibility for
a contract.
Payment by results A type of public policy where payments are contingent on the
independent verification of results. Staffing model A model for staff requirements and which staff will be allocated
to a contract to meet its contract management requirements.
PFI Private Finance Initiative (PFI) as a way of funding public
infrastructure projects with private capital. Substantive test Analytical procedures or tests of detail used to verify assertions.
Preferred bidder The bidder which the vendor intends to award the Supplier Methods of strategically planning for, and managing,
business to, subject to the completion of negotiations Relationship interactions with supplier.
and legal arrangements. Management (SRM)
Project The whole process by which projects are carried out, including Transitioning Process of changing from one contract for a service/good to
management wider strategic consideration outside of commercial factors. another contract for the same or similar contract/good.
77
Appendices
Navigation Home
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
1 of 4
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
links to insights
Study title
78
Appendices
Navigation Home
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
2 of 4
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
Study title
79
Appendices
Navigation Home
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
3 of 4
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
Study title
80
Appendices
Navigation Home
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
4 of 4
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
Study title
Our enquires into Civil Service Learning’s contract with Capita, 2015
Department for Work & Pensions: Universal Credit: Progress update, 2014
Department for Transport and HS2 Ltd: Progress with preparation for High Speed 2, 2016
81
Appendices
Navigation Home
1 Commercial
capability
Transition
& termination
7 2
5 4
Contract Contract
management approach
Useful links
National Audit Office Green Book supplementary guidance The Scottish Government’s Procurement
(NAO) guidance on delivering public value from Competency Framework
spending proposals
NAO Overview of commercial and The Scottish Government’s
contracting in government Crown Commercial Service contract Procurement Journey
management principles
NAO Good practice contract Government Commercial Function-
management framework Crown Commercial Service model Government Commercial Operating
services contract Standards Iteration ii
NAO Managing supplier failure
Local Government Association’s making IACCM’s Ten pitfalls to avoid
NAO Open-book accounting
savings from contract management in contracting
and supply‑chain assurance
Crown Commercial Service Open
NAO Payment by results Sources of information
Book Contract Management Guidance
analytical framework
Whole of government accounts 2014-15
Procurement Policy Note –
Taking Account of Suppliers’ HM Treasury Public Expenditure
Other guidance
Past Performance Statistical Analysis
CIPFA Practical Guide to Contract
Management in the Public Sector Procurement Policy Note –
Information sharing in Government
CIPFA Open book procurement exercises
contract management
Local Government Association’s
CIPS Contract management guide A Councillor’s Guide to Procurement
82