An Analysis of Modified K-Means Algorithm in A Wireless Environment
An Analysis of Modified K-Means Algorithm in A Wireless Environment
GROUP GRADE
Criteria Sufficient Satisfactory Good (3) Very Excellent
(1) (2) Good (4) (5)
Literature review. Does the thesis demonstrate that the
author has familiarized himself/herself extensively with
the literature relevant to the topic, and especially with
the latest studies? Are references used correctly?
Knowledge of the topic. Does the author discuss the
topic and present the results in a manner that
demonstrates that he/she has studied the topic
thoroughly, understood the subject matter, and applied
the field's methods correctly?
Presentation and the communication of ideas. Is the use
of language correct and clear? Is the structure of the
thesis logical? Is the topic treated carefully and
correctly? Does the thesis form a coherent and logical
whole that is easy to follow?
Originality and innovativeness. Is the topic presented in
innovatively? Is it treated more clearly than in the
literature? Is source literature reviewed critically? Does
the author use original examples to illustrate matters?
Does the thesis include original remarks or even
scientifically significant results?
Organization. Manuscript is well organized and
structured. The Prescribed Thesis Format was strictly
adhered to. Language clearly and effectively
communicates ideas Shows near flawless editing for
grammar, syntax, punctuation, spelling Writing style is
eloquent/engaging Pages have white spaces,
paragraphs of adequate length and is flowing. Work is
focused. Organization is clear and effective Sources
and citations used correctly. In text citations are found
in the Reference section.
Scientific Accuracy. Scientific explanations or facts
presented/cited are 100% accurate.
University of Makati
JP Rizal Extension, West Rembo, Makati City THESIS 2
College of Computer Science Final Thesis Defense Evaluation Form
INDIVIDUAL GRADE
Criteria
Understanding of topic 25%
The topic is clearly understood, the topic in-depth, and information is
presented forcefully and convincingly
Presentation Style 25%
Consistently used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice, and level of
enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience
Information 25%
All information presented in the thesis defense was clear, accurate,
and thorough
Use of Facts/ Statistics 25%
Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts,
statistics and/or examples
TOTAL GRADE
Revision Deadline
Evaluated by: