Civic Education FinalFeb07
Civic Education FinalFeb07
Civic Education FinalFeb07
Civic Education
1
Adapted from Branson, Margaret S. (1998). The Role of Civic Education: A
Forthcoming Education Policy Task Force Position Paper from the
Communitarian Network, Washington, DC: Center for Civic Education
1
Books and Monographs Relating to the Issue of Civic Education and
Higher Education for the Public Good
Selected Annotations
Beaumont, E., Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., & Stevens, J. (2003). Educating citizens: Preparing
America's undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Reports on how some American colleges and universities are preparing thoughtful,
committed, and socially responsible graduates. Many institutions assert these ambitions,
but too few act on them. The authors demonstrate the fundamental importance of moral
and civic education, describe how the historical and contemporary landscapes of higher
education have shaped it, and explain the educational and developmental goals and
processes involved in educating citizens. They examine the challenges colleges and
universities face when they dedicate themselves to this vital task and present concrete
ways to overcome those challenges.
Bergerson, P. J. (1991). Teaching public policy: Theory, research, and practice. New
York: Greenwood Press.
This book explores a wide range of topics in policy theory research and public
administration education. The essays are grouped into seven categories, covering
organizational theory and ethics, research skills, program evaluation and management,
financial management, communication skills, international developments, and
contemporary policy issues. In addition to their academic quality, each contribution
emphasizes successful strategies for teaching in the classroom.
Groundbreaking work by the late head of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement
for Teaching questions the reward system that pushes faculty toward research and away
from teaching. Boyer offers a new paradigm of balancing what he suggests are the four
general areas scholarship: discovery, integration of knowledge, teaching, and service.
Readers are presented with a vision for higher education in the 21st century through the
concept of colleges and universities as citizens. The authors continue the discussion of
Ernest Boyer's vision of the engaged campus," illustrating the rewards and risks and
providing a critical examination of the implications of engagement on the various
institutions of higher education. Each chapter discusses the status of higher education, the
factors that have shaped its current status, and the steps that could be taken to produce
change. The authors provide informative historical analyses, case studies, and conceptual
frameworks through which planning and work can be construed and evaluated.
Ehrlich, T. (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. Phoenix, Az: Oryx Press.
Guarasci, R., & Cornwell, G. H. (1997). Democratic education in an age of difference:
redefining citizenship in higher education (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
More than a century ago, John Dewey challenged the education community to look to
civic involvement for the betterment of both community and campus. Today, the
challenge remains. In this landmark book, editor Thomas Ehrlich has collected essays
from national leaders who have focused on civic responsibility and higher education.
Imparting both philosophy and working example, Ehrlich provides the inspiration for
innovative new programs in this essential area of learning. Explains the theory and
practice of civic learning and provides practical examples of programs that prepare
students for lives of civic engagement.
Keywords: Citizenship, Study and teaching, Higher Education, Aims and objectives
Over the past two decades, American campuses have become embroiled in debates and
controversies over multiculturalism, curriculum, free speech, and other issues of social,
ethnic, sexual, and racial differences. But out of this turbulence some exciting, innovative
experiments have emerged to show students and academic leaders that there are
promising maps for bridging acknowledged differences and creating a dynamic new unity
behind the principles of democracy. Democratic Education in an Age of Difference
details some of those experiments - among them learning communities, residential
communities, and public service - and reveals how each approach fosters the
development of democratic sensibility, citizenship skills, and multicultural fluency.
Lisman, C. D. (1998). Toward a civil society: civic literacy and service learning.
Westport, Conn: Bergin & Garvey.
Addressing the need for marshalling the resources of education to help promote a more
civil society, this book argues that education has a critical role to play in challenging the
dominant views of politics and education. Service-learning, or academically-based
community service is seen as a promising educational pedagogy that can help students
acquire civic virtue and serve as a mechanism to enable institutions of higher education
become stronger community partners. However, there is currently a lack of theoretical
grounding for the service-learning movement; consequently, service-learning is in danger
of being co-opted by academic traditionalism, which could vitiate service-learning's
social transformative potential and in fact undermine efforts at democratic revitalization.
Keywords: Student services, Higher Education, Social aspects, Civics Study and teaching
United States.
Stephen Macedo believes that diversity should-but not always-be highly valued. We must
remember, he insists, that many forms of social and religious diversity are at odds with
basic commitments to liberty, equality, and civic flourishing. Liberalism has an important
but neglected civic dimension, he argues, and liberal democrats must take care to
promote not only well-ordered institutions but also well-ordered citizens. Macedo shows
that this responsibility is incompatible with a neutral or hands-off stance toward diversity
in general or toward the education of children in particular. Extending the ideas of John
Rawls, he defends a "civic liberalism" that supports the legitimacy of reasonable efforts
to inculcate shared political virtues while leaving many larger questions of meaning and
value to private communities. Macedo's tough-minded liberal agenda for civic education
offers a fundamental challenge to free market libertarians, the religious right, parental
rights activists, postmodernists, and many of those who call themselves multiculturalists.
Keywords: Public schools, Moral education, Citizenship Study and teaching, Liberalism,
Multiculturalism United States.
Orrill, R., & College Entrance Examination Board. (1997). Education and democracy:
Re-imagining liberal learning in America. New York: College Entrance
Examination Board.
Liberal education has long been associated with a focus on so-called "great books" drawn
largely from the European past. In sharp contrast, this collection of essays explores the
theory and practice of contemporary liberal education from the perspective of a
distinctively American pragmatic tradition. The result is a re-imagined liberal education
adapted to the needs of American democracy in the twenty-first century.
Reeher, G. and J. Cammarano (1997). Education for citizenship : ideas and innovations
in political learning. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
This book addresses the challenge of education for citizenship at a specific, concrete
level. It offers examples of efforts to create among our students a new set of what
Tocqueville called mores or culturally defining "habits of the heart" which will enhance
citizenship, foster a sense of connectedness to a community stretching beyond the
university, and ultimately, support the practices, basic values, and institutions necessary
for the democratic process.
Selected References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1983). Science and technology
education for civic and professional life, the undergraduate years). Washington,
DC: Association of American Colleges.
Arizona Educational Information System. (1994a). Citizenship education. Tempe, AZ:
AEIS Arizona State University.
Arizona Educational Information System. (1994b). Democracy's students critical
thinking & citizenship. Tempe, AZ: AEIS Arizona State University.
Baker, J. H. (1913). Educational aims and civic needs. New York: Longmans Green.
Selected Annotations
This article discusses rejuvenation of the campus community service movement and its
potential to explore the meaning of citizenship in a democracy. The author argues that
civic education should be an integral part of a liberal education and that community
service can help prepare students for citizenship. The points are illustrated by the
presentation of a Rutgers University (New Jersey) program illustrates how service and
citizen education can be linked effectively.
Barber, B. R. (1998). The Apprenticeship of Liberty: Schools for Democracy. The School
Administrator, 55(5), 10-12.
Barber writes about higher education and its original mission of civic education. He
describes the movement toward professionalization of higher education after WWII and
the need for schools to revitalize their civic education to enrich public life and keep
democracy strong.
Beckham, E. (1999). Civic Learning and Campus Diversity: Bridging the Language Gap.
Peer Review, 2(1), 4-7.
Burger, W., & et al. (1988). The Community College & the Constitution: Promoting
Civic Responsibility. Community, Technical, and Junior College Journal, 59(1),
21-28.
This article contains three essays on civic responsibility and the two-year college's role in
civic education. Includes "Warren Burger and the Power of the Constitution," an
interview with Burger by Dale Parnell; "Educating for Citizenship," by Herbert M.
Atherton; and "Sustaining the Nation's Commitment to Civic Responsibility," by John H.
Buchanan, Jr.
Burstyn, J. N. (1983). The Civic Purpose of Education: Process and Product. Journal of
Teacher Education, 34(6), 2-5.
This article takes a process oriented perspective to Civic education. Burstyn maintains
that society is changing, and a new consensus must be reached about the purposes of
civic education. All those with an interest--not just educational theorists--should
participate in shaping this consensus. Teacher educators must teach student teachers to
share in this process and link their ideas to moral issues.
Clark, T., Croddy, M., & Hayes, W. (1997). Service learning as civic participation.
Theory into Practice, 164-169.
Cogan, J. J. (1999). Civic education in the United States: a brief history. International
Journal of Social Education, 14, 52-64.
A brief historical overview of civic education in the U.S. is presented in this article which
is part of a special section on civic education in the Pacific region. This overview covers
the historical background of civic education in the U.S., the distinction between civic and
citizenship education, the content and reflective inquiry approaches to civic education in
the U.S., the development of national standards for civic education, and the future of
civic education in the U.S.
Cone, R., David D. Cooper, & Hollander, E. L. (2001). Voting and Beyond: Engaging
Students in Our Representative Democracy. About Campus, 2-8.
Students are less politically active and many teachers and citizens are worried about its
implications for the health of American democracy. The authors give recommendations
about how to increase political interest and civic learning, beyond just voting.
Damon, W. (1998). The Path to a Civil Society Goes Through the University. The
Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(NO.8), B4-B5.
The author points out that most intellectuals who bemoan the lack of social capital do not
use their position in education to increase civic learning. Damon discusses the influence
and power education has and how higher education can use its time and resources to
promote citizenship.
De Simone recounts Hofstadter's theories from the 1960s about the future of higher
education. He departs from Progressives, who favor more access and increasing
democratization of education, and argues such policies promote anti-intellectualism and
utilitarianism. De Simone believes that we should revisit his arguments and prevent
increasing vocationalism of institutions.
John Dewey's "Democracy and Education" suggests an approach to civic education using
techniques commonly adopted in today's undergraduate education, including community
service, problem solving, and collaborative learning. Community service is an important
way to foster civic engagement in young Americans. If American higher education is to
help realize Dewey's vision of democracy, new forms of learning and defining knowledge
are needed. (MSE)
Ehrlich, T. (1999). Civic Education: Lessons Learned. PS: Political Science and Politics,
32(2), 245-250.
Ekman, R., & Strassburger, J. (1984). Improving the Preparation of Teachers of Civic
Education. Social Studies Review, 24(1), 83-88.
The authors describe perspectives of the American "founding fathers" concerning civic
education and in this light discuss what the curriculum for training civic teachers should
include. Teachers should study history, social and political thought, economics, human
motivation and organizational behavior, and the American experience as seen in an
international context.
Finklestein, B. (1988). Rescuing Civic Learning: Some Prescriptions for the 1990s.
Theory into Practice, 27(4), 251-256.
Several civic education reformers identify a need for integrating visions of education and
citizenship. This article identifies and analyzes the prescriptions of four distinct groups of
civic educational reformers: civic imperials, civic spiritualists, civic intellectuals, and
civic communitarians.
Outcries about the decline of civic institutions have initiated a return to civism, with
partnerships forming between higher education, business, civic, and political leaders to
work on civic problems, and a trend toward less government and more governance. This
calls for civic education as a lifelong process, not just within the baccalaureate
curriculum.
Maintaining that universities need to change their curriculum and attitudes so they can
better educate students to be citizens, Gabelnick offers examples of institutions that have
changed both internally and how they work with external organizations. He also gives
advice on how a university can better provide for civic education.
Giroux, S. S. (2000). Race, Rhetoric, and the Contest over Civic Education. JAC: A
Journal of Composition Theory, 20(2), 311-348.
Hahn, C. L. (2001). Student Views of Democracy: The Good and Bad News. Social
Education, 456-459.
This article reports on the results of the International Association for Evaluation of
Educational Achievement test administered on international ninth graders. The study
reports that United States student score well compared to their international counterparts,
but show a lack of civic knowledge. the authors point out the importance of secondary
and higher education in educating young people about the principles of democracy.
Ikenberry gives an introduction to the theme in the "Educational Record" and addresses
the role of a university in civic education. He believes a balance must be struck and
universities should make an effort to promote citizenship for the greater public good.
Jennings, B., & et al. (1996). Values on Campus. Liberal Education, 82(1), 26-31.
Keywords: Citizenship Education, College Role, Liberal Arts, Moral Values, Social
Values, Values Education
Karp, S. (1997). Educating for a civil society: the core issue is inequality. Educational
Leadership, 40-43.
Ketcham, R., & Woyach, R. B. (1992). In the Nation's Service: A Rationale for Civic
Education
In the 1900s, emphasis on specialization, technical studies, and vocation that has
undermined liberal education generally has taken a particular toll on civic education,
departing from the ideal of education for the public interest. The college curriculum can
incorporate education for participation in government in a variety of ways.
King, P. M. (1997). Character and Civic Education: What Does It Take? Educational
Record, 78(3-4), 87-93.
Colleges and universities can communicate expectations for students' moral, ethical, and
character development through both the environment they creates and their formal
curricula, particularly through stated goals. A model of moral development provides
insights into the processes needed to foster moral behavior, and the experiences of other
institutions.
Part of a special issue on promoting community renewal through civic literacy and
service learning. A profile of the Community Involvement Program, which was
developed by the Community College of Aurora. It is believed that such programs can
assist in significantly extending the role of education in community development. As part
of the program, the college operates the Lowry Family Center, which provides referral
services for families in need and workshops on such topics as parenting, GED
preparation, youth enrichment, and literacy. A Center for Workforce Development is also
managed by the college for people in need, and it provides courses in metrology and
biotechnology and courses for single mothers in nontraditional careers. The introduction
of a leadership and citizenship education program for local residents is an additional
element of the program.
McDonnell, M. (1996). Civic education of, by and for the students. Momentum, 8-11.
The Close Up Foundation takes the science of the government out of the textbook and
into the classroom using hands-on approaches. The Close Up Foundation was established
to develop knowledge, skills, and attitudes that encourage greater civic participation by
exposing people of all ages to the political process, basic democratic principles, and
history. The foundation emphasizes a diversity of participants, active learning, a balance
of perspectives, and cooperative learning structures. The foundation's approach is
successful mainly because it involves students in hands-on learning, whereby they, like
the participants in a democracy, often decide upon the agenda. A textbook is not required
to develop many civic skills in the classroom, and teachers of civic education should
encourage students to become involved with the citizens and institutions of their
democracy. This article is part of a special section on Catholic education as the route to
freedom.
Morrison, T. (2001). How can values be taught in the university?. with discussion.
Michigan Quarterly Review, 40, 273-278.
The role of the university in teaching values is the focal point of this article. Morrison
points out that although the genesis of higher education is unashamedly theological and
conscientiously value-ridden, the academy has, for the most part, shed its theological
coat. She also points out, however, that the real or imagined search for "goodness"
continues to be a part of the justifying, legitimizing language of the academy. She
maintains that institutional directives relating to ethical questions, although capable of
impressing on the student body the serious way in which the university regards certain
matters, can also become formulaic. Also she suggests that, ultimately, individuals are
paradigms of their own values and teach them by having them. Nevertheless, she
acknowledges that if the university does not take seriously its roles as defender of civic
freedoms and interrogator of ethical problems, some other regime or ménage of regimes
may decide these issues without consulting those involved.
This article provides some background on Frank Abbott Magruder and compares the
1917 and 1993 editions of his landmark textbook, "American Government." Although the
text has gone through 76 editions it remains true to Magruder's original intention to
portray the fluid and dynamic nature of U.S. democracy.
Neiman, A. M. (1997). Pragmatism, Thomism, and the Metaphysics of Desire: Two Rival
Versions of Liberal Education. Educational Theory, 47(NO.1), 91-117.
Nieman reviews the theories proposed by authors such as Allan Bloom, Benjamin Barber,
and Rene Arcilla. Bloom argues for a model of education that uses the Platonic definition
of learning: the pursuit of truth through reason, capable by only highly intelligent
individuals. This pursuit satisfies "metaphysical longing for answers to questions like
"Why are we here?" Barber believes that this account of education is incorrect and that
higher education should concentrate on teaching democracy, liberty, and freedom. This is
a pragmatic approach, redirecting metaphysical longing to a longing for community and
the way to ensure survival of community. Barber believes universities should become
dedicated to civic virtue rather than the pursuit of truth, both serving and challenging
students. Nieman believes a more middle approach, Thomism, should be used to combine
metaphysical questions with more pragmatic implications. This avoids the authoritarian
nature of Bloom while compensating for lack of individualistic concerns in Barber.
Oldenquist, A. (Ed.). (1996). Can Democracy Be Taught? Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta
Kappa Educational Foundation, Bloomington IN.
The essays in this collection, rewritten and expanded especially for this volume,
originated as papers that were presented at a 1993 conference on Education for
Democracy sponsored by the Mershon Center at The Ohio State University. The
contributors from the United States, South Africa, Germany, and Russia, are experts in
civic education, problems of minorities, the U.S. Constitution, the transition to
democracy in former communist countries, and education and democracy in South Africa
and Japan. All of the essays are concerned with aspects of the ideal of democracy: what it
is, how it evolves, and the goals of democracy yet to be achieved. It is implied in each
essay that democracy has a concrete definition with a range of features, and that despite
the imprimatur of "democracy" applied by a government, not all governments claiming to
be democracies are true and genuine democracies. Moreover, there is a distinct difference
Parker-Gwin, R., & Mabry, J. B. (1998). Service Learning as Pedagogy and Civic
Education: Comparing Outcomes for Three Models. Teaching Sociology, 26(4),
276-291.
The writers examine both civic and academic outcomes for 260 students participating in
three models of service learning courses (placement-service optional, placement-service
required, and a consulting group). Findings suggest that that after one semester of service
learning, student outcomes were mixed. A key recommendation is that instructors
consider carefully whether to require student participation in service learning.
Rifkin, J. (1998). A civil education for the twenty-first century: preparing students for a
three-sector society. National Civic Review, 87, 177-181.
The writer discusses the importance of preparing students for a three-sector society in the
21st century. He argues that society is being transformed by a shift from the Industrial
Age to the Information Age and that preparing the next generation for this change
necessitates a rethink of the very purpose of American education. Thinking of society as
creating three types of capital--social capital, market capital, and public capital--opens up
new possibilities for reconceptualizing the social contract and the type of education that
is given to young people. Furthermore, the third sector, civil society, is likely to play a far
more significant role in job creation and social-service provision in the next century.
Seaberry, J., & Davis, J. L. (1997). The metropolitan university: history, mission, and
defining characteristics. New Directions for Student Services no79.
The writers discuss the historical background of the metropolitan university and the
changes in community, technology, and society related to its mission, goals, and
Shapiro, B. (2002). Higher education in the new century--some history, some challenges.
Education Canada, 42, 12-15.
This article is part of a special section on globalization and education. Universities face
several challenges in the 21st century. Universities must meet the challenge of serving a
civic purpose in the context of a rapidly changing environment. They must also realize
that their historic monopoly over the provision, accreditation, and certification of higher
education will attenuate as new competitors enter the educational services marketplace
and that they will neither monopolize nor dominate electronic education. In this regard,
they must face the challenge of finding common ground on which to work with their
competitors. Universities must meet other challenges of expansion and differentiation and
Shermis, S. (1991). Social Scientists, Historians and Super Patriots: The Origins of Civic
Education in the United States. Southern Social Studies Journal, 17(1), 2-16.
The author discusses social studies' evolution as a discipline from its 1890s origins
through the twentieth century. He also examines the objectives of historians, sociologists,
and "super patriots" (proponents of the Americanism movement) in advancing citizenship
training. Shermis concludes that the failure to achieve some of the original goals of social
studies may be because of those goals' inconsistency with patriotic indoctrination.
Stanley, M. (1983). How to Think Anew about Civic Education. Journal of Teacher
Education, 34(6), 38-40.
This writer maintains that both the classical humanist and modern social science
approaches have much to contribute to civic education. Compartmentalized approaches
should be renounced in favor of broader, integral, aggressive, and scholarly examinations
of how education already embodies and broadcasts multiple models of the social world
and conceptions of values.
This article suggests that globalization places limits on state autonomy and national
sovereignty, affecting education in various ways. Those limits are expressed in tensions
between global and local dynamics in virtually every policy domain. Globalization not
only blurs national boundaries but also shifts solidarities within and outside the national
state. Globalization cannot be defined exclusively by the post-Fordist organization of
production: therefore, issues of human rights will play a major role affecting civic
minimums at the state level, the performance of capital and labor in various domains, and
particularly the dynamics of citizenship and democracy in the modern state. However,
educational policy and its contributions to citizenship, democracy, and multiculturalism
will face unprecedented challenges if the logic of fear, exacerbated by the events of
September 11, prevails.
The writer holds that only way to improve citizen participation in the political system is
to renew the commitment to civic education. His perspective is that a successful civic
education is one that educates its citizens in the basic principles and precepts of the
American system and then keeps them informed.
Abisellán, E. (2000). Fostering democracy through law and civic education. The Florida
Bar Journal, 74, 59-62.
Avery, P. G., & Simmons, A. M. (2000). Civic life as conveyed in United States civics
and history textbooks. International Journal of Social Education, 15, 105-130.
Bahmueller, C. F. (1997). A framework for teaching democratic citizenship: an
international project. International Journal of Social Education, 12, 101-112.
Barber, B. R. (1994). A Proposal for Mandatory Citizen Education and Community
Service. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1(1), 86-93.
Barber, B. R. (1998). The Apprenticeship of Liberty: Schools for Democracy. The School
Administrator, 55(NO.5), 10-12.
Barber, B. R. (2002). Globalizing Democracy. The American Prospect.
Beadie, N. (1996). From "teacher as decision maker" to teacher as participant in "shared
decision making": reframing the purpose of social foundations in teacher
education. Teachers College Record, 77-103.
Beckham, E. (1999). Civic Learning and Campus Diversity: Bridging the Language Gap.
Peer Review, 2(1), 4-7.
Bennett, S. E. (1999). Rebuttal to Response by Stephen Leonard. PS: Political Science
and Politics, 32(4), 760.
Bensimon, E. M., & Soto, M. (1997). Can we rebuild civic life without a multiracial
university? Change, 42-44.
Benton-Evans, R. (1997). Educating the Contemporary Citizen: Individual Choice or
Community Responsibility? Canadian Social Studies, 31(3), 145-146,151.
Billig, S. H. (2000). The effects of service learning. School Administrator, 57, 14-18.
Boyd, S. M. (1996). Character education, the U.S. Constitution, and the U.S. Supreme
Court. Update on Law Related Education, 23-25.
Boyte, H. C. (2000). The Struggle against Positivism. Academe, 86(4), 46-51.
Branson, M. S. (1999). The role of civic education. Schools in the Middle, 9, 28-33.
Braungart, R. G., & Braungart, M. M. (1996). Perceptions of Self, the United States, and
Europe: A Study of Upstate New York University Students. Youth & Society,
27(3), 259-290.
Burger, W., & et al. (1988). The Community College & the Constitution: Promoting
Civic Responsibility. Community, Technical, and Junior College Journal, 59(1),
21-28.
Burstyn, J. N. (1983). The Civic Purpose of Education: Process and Product. Journal of
Teacher Education, 34(6), 2-5.
Carter, L. H., & Elshtain, J. B. (1997). Task Force to Set Agenda for Civic Education
Program. PS: Political Science and Politics, 30(4), 744-745.
Ceaser, J. W., & McGuinn, P. J. (1998). Civic education reconsidered. The Public
Interest no133.
Checkoway, B. (2000). Public Service: Our New Mission. Academe, 24-28.
Checkoway, B. (2001). Renewing the civic mission of the American research university.
The Journal of Higher Education, 72, 125-147.
Selected Annotations
Bellefleur, J. R. (1981). Higher Education for the Many: The Realization and Abridgment
of Extended Educational Access, in Detroit and at Wayne University, 1917-1961.
(Volumes I and Ii).
The dissertation examines the historic role of elite higher education in preparing students
for active participation in political life. It does this by examining the pedagogical visions
and curricular commitments of Noah Porter (president of Yale from 1871 to 1886),
Charles Eliot (president of Harvard from 1869 to 1909) and Woodrow Wilson (president
of Princeton from 1902 to 1910). Educational historians have usually cast Eliot as the
progressive force in American higher education while painting Porter and Wilson in
diminished or even contrary roles. This dissertation does not take issue with the basic
thrust of this history, it focuses on deficiencies in all three of these educators' approaches
that served to compromise their commitment to strong civic education. These educators
compromised, or threatened to compromise, civic education because they ascribed to
ideals and practices which are often at odds with the development of citizenship. The
determination of these educators' civic commitments is circumscribed by the
dissertation's exclusive focus on a republican definition of citizenship. Republicans
equate citizenship with participation in political life and are consequently threatened by
rhetorical and economic practices which appear to discourage political participation..
Eliot's civic commitments were compromised by rhetorical and economic proclivities that
The aspects of educational institutions and the systemic practice of education are the
product of 2 distinct features of education. The first is the institutional practice of a
chosen philosophy of education. The second is the technologies that have afforded the
facilitation of information production, consumption and distribution-essential processes
of education. Taking advantage of major reform opportunities in educational practice,
made possible by an emerging digital information system, the current trend in education
tends to relinquish the long tradition of philosophy of education and embraces the
cultivation of a reflective and productive citizenry through education. However, by
looking at the ways in which the technologies of their time constrained or enabled the
imaginations of our most influential philosophers of education (Plato, Rousseau and
Dewey), we will better understand how real technologies and ideal philosophies are
necessarily related. With such knowledge, we may inform our educational reform
alternatives with the goal of developing a democratic citizenry through education.
Keywords:
Selected References
Bellefleur, J. R. (1981). Higher Education for the Many: The Realization and Abridgment
of Extended Educational Access, in Detroit and at Wayne University, 1917-1961.
(Volumes I and Ii).
Boitano, J. J. (1990). Educating citizens for democracy: Aristotle, John Locke, and Jean-
Jacques Rousseau on civic education. Catholic University of America,
Washington, DC.
Cody, C. L. (2000). Towards global democracy education: An examination of civic
education in the United States. Unpublished M.A., Johns Hopkins University,
Baltimore, Maryland.
Dawson, L. S. (1986). The application of cognitive developmental research to civic
education.
Dissertations and Theses: Civic Education
Kellogg Forum on Higher Education for the Public Good
Annotated Bibliography Project
29
Diemont, D. A. (1988). Individualism and democracy: strengthening democratic life
through civic education.
Fernandez, L. O. (1997). Preparing Students for Citizenship: The Pedagogical Vision of
Yale's Noah Porter, Harvard's Charles Eliot and Princeton's Woodrow Wilson
(Civic Education, Republicanism).
Fischer, J. M. (1999). Negotiating school and university relationships in the context of
Polish Civic Education Reform. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Fontaine, P. L. (1996). A comparative study of civic education in France and the United
States.
Gilbert, S. L. (2001). Civic education in our schools.
Hajdo, D. (1999). National service and civic education: the potential of AmeriCorps'
national civilian community corps to foster civic character.
Hogan, J. A. (2000). Digital democracy: A series of reflections on Plato, Rousseau and
Dewey and the role that technology played in constraining and liberating their
imagination, the plight of educational reform in the midst of digital innovation,
and the potentiality of Dante in the transformation of education into a relevant,
integrated and democratic incubator for citizens. Columbia University, New
York, NY.
Ibarra, L. (2001). Microsociety : civic education, academic achievement, and higher
education aspirations through experiential learning. Unpublished M.A.,
University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas.
Isaacson, J. A. (2001). Spiritual leadership.
Jacobs, E. J. (1999). Zeal for American democracy: civic education and the cold war
1947-1954.
Johnson, V. M. G. (1967). One link in civic education.
Jones, E. D. (1953). A hundred years of civic education in Washington: 1853-1953.
Unpublished Ph.D, Stanford University, Palo Alto.
Jones, J. D. (2000). History, civic education, and liberal democracy. Unpublished Ph.D.,
University of Wisconsin--Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Kinas, A. (1952). A study of the adult civic education curricula for immigrants with
special reference to ten communities in Massachusetts.
La Fountain, M. K. (1946). The status of civic education in leading state teachers
colleges and state education departments. Unpublished M.A., Boston University,
Boston, MA.
Lagow, R. (1946). Civic education of the foreign-born adult. Texas, Dallas.
McKelvain, W. R. (1974). The effect of civic education on the political attitudes of
college freshmen. Texas, College Station.
Meserve, G. H. (1940). Radio as an effective means of adult civic education.
Newman, R. E. (1960). A civic education project implementing the social problems
technique of instruction.
Newman, R. E. (1961). History of a civic education project implementing the social-
problems technique of instruction.
Parker, L. A. A. (1992). American civic education, 1607-1925. Unpublished Ph.D,
University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.
Selected Annotations
Boggs, D. L. (1992). Adult Civic Education. ERIC Digest No. 129. Columbus, OH: ERIC
Clearinghouse on Adult Career and Vocational Education.
This report addresses civic knowledge, skills, and the disposition to use them to achieve a
vision of the community that is desired. These faculties can be furthered through
purposefully structured civic education. The integral elements of adult civic education are
information, values, and action. An objective in adult civic education should be to help
citizens learn how to use the aid of experts and qualified professionals in making public
policy decisions while limiting it to citizen review and control. Another problem for adult
civic education is to help learners develop civic virtue as a basis for acting when their
involvement in a public issue in the first place is often driven by emotional investment in
a special interest, deflecting attention from a larger view of public responsibilities. The
ultimate objective of civic education is to help citizens learn to be morally responsible
actors. Adult educators have responsibility to serve as advocates, not of specific choices
or solutions to public issues, but of thoughtful and deliberate choice that is a prelude to
action.
Boyer, E. L., & Hechinger, F. M. (1981). Higher Learning in the Nation's Service: A
Carnegie Foundation Essay. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the
Advancement of Teaching.
This report examines the services that have been provided by colleges and universities in
the United States and the current confusion regarding the role of American higher
education. Among the contributions made by higher education are: extending higher
learning to new classes of people, advancing the nation's frontiers, providing scientific
expertise during wartime, and helping veterans return to rewarding civilian pursuits.
Presently, the external needs for higher learning's services are apparently less urgent than
in the past and colleges are questioning their purposes in society. Three historic functions
of higher education are examined: teaching, research, and service. It is suggested that
there are new challenges for higher education. Colleges must not only teach, but must
also educate a generation of students quite different from those of the past. Not only must
they conduct research, but they must do so with reduced federal support and must
consider enticing but potentially compromising allegiances with the private sector. As a
new approach to service, public policy studies for all students are advocated, with special
encouragement for a new program of civic education for adults. The writers propose that
This report includes a foreword and 11 articles discuss the nature and structure of public
scholarship. The contents include: "Foreword" (Deborah Witte); (1) "Public Scholarship:
The Dissemination of Knowledge" (Jean Cameron) which maintains the public has
claims on higher education as a creator and disseminator of knowledge; (2) "Daring to Be
Unprofessional" (David W. Brown) which suggests the professional ethos is often at odds
with the needs of students and other realities on campus; (3) "Towards an Ethic of
Academic Discourse, Or, Why Do Professors Talk the Way They Do?" (Bennett
Ramsey) which considers the need to balance academic research and academic
accessibility; (4) "Pedagogical and Civic Response-Abilities" (Stephen M. Johnson)
which examines open-ended learning and multicultural classrooms; (5) "An Agenda for
Involving Faculty in Service" (Deborah Hirsch) which proposes service learning as a
form of faculty professional service; (6) "The Promise and the Flaws of Public
Scholarship" (Alan Wolfe) which presents public scholarship as an obligation to share
knowledge; (7) "Public Scholars: In Search of a Usable Present--A Reply to Alan Wolfe"
(Jay Rosen) which stresses the need to disseminate knowledge and create it in a group
fashion; (8) "Public Scholarship and the Land-Grant Idea" (Scott J. Peters) which notes
the legacy of partnership between university and community; (9) "Civic Education in a
New Key" (Bernard Murchland) which urges the centrality of educating for a healthy
civic society; (10) "Public Deliberation: A Resurgence of Scholarly Interest" (Dennis
Gilbert) which notes that public deliberation strengthens the legitimacy of public
institutions; and (11) "The Public and the Academy" (David Mathews) which offers a
broad look at the relationship between institutions of higher education and the civic
realm.
Butts, R. F. (1989). The Civic Mission in Educational Reform: Perspectives for the
Public and the Profession. (Education and Society Series). U.S.; California.
This study stresses the need to improve the quality of civic education at all levels within
the educational system in the United States. A theory for the practice of citizenship that
enlists the support of a broad spectrum of the diverse ethnic, linguistic, and religious
groups that must live and work together is provided. The volume contends that the civic
mission of education can be served best if schools concentrate on those civic values that
This evaluation report documents the CIVITAS program's progress toward its five stated
goals: (1) acquaint educators from Eastern and Central Europe with exemplary curricular
and teacher training programs in civic education developed in the United States; (2) assist
educators from Eastern and Central Europe in adapting and implementing effective civic
education programs in their own countries; (3) create instructional materials for students
in the United States that will help them better understand emerging constitutional
democracies; (4) facilitate the exchange of ideas and experiences in civic education
among political, educational, and private sector leaders from Eastern and Central Europe,
the United States, and other established democracies; and (5) encourage research to
determine the effects of civic education on the development of knowledge, skills, and
traits of public and private character essential for the preservation and improvement of
constitutional democracy. The report states that U.S. partners and people from Eastern
and Central Europe were asked to respond to questionnaires eliciting both numerical and
narrative data regarding their progress toward meeting these goals. Questionnaires were
mailed in July and October of 1998 to 12 European partners and 16 U. S. partners. Six
European partners and nine U. S. partners responded. According to the report, responses
from both U.S. and European partners clearly indicated that at these partnership sites at
least four of the five goals are being achieved. The only goal not yet being achieved, by
all but one site, is conducting research to determine the impact of civic education and the
development of knowledge skills and traits essential for the improvement of
constitutional democracy.
Eisenberg Associates for the American Association of Community and Junior Colleges.
(1989). Civic Responsibility and the American Student: The Challenges and
Opportunities of National Service. (The American Seminar VI: Teleconference
Workbook). Washington, DC: American Association of Community and Junior
Colleges.
Green, T. F., & et al. (1969-03-00). Some Aspects of Socialization Through Formal
Schooling Relating Primarily to Civic and Moral Education. Final Report.
Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ. NY. School of Education.
This is the report of a seminar assembled to develop ideas and stimulate interest in the
study of the intersection between the social sciences and moral theory with respect to
how formal schooling functions in the process of moral and civic education. The report
consists essentially in the production of the papers produced for the seminar, in the stage
they reached at the point of seminar meetings, and some summary of what emerged in the
course of the discussion. The essays are reproduced, together with a brief assessment of
the essential conclusions.
This report addresses learning units which should be at the heart of a program in civic
education general education in community colleges. Citizenship education is congruent
with the mission of the community college in that it is a practical enterprise leading to
self-governance; it is integrative, using a variety of cognitive skills, attitudes and
knowledge; it is community relevant; and it enhances career development. By adopting a
conception of general education that inclines toward the notion of education for
democratic participation, community colleges can contribute to the process of political
socialization and better fulfill their obligation to the community which is their source of
support. Advantages of civic education for community college students include the
possibilities of reducing political power differentials; addressing social issues of
importance to a "late bloomer" student population; and developing a sense of community
among students. Some objections to mandated programs in civic education focus on the
curriculum constraints imposed on the community college. Issues of freedom versus
constraint, individualism versus social obligation, and vocationalism versus liberal
learning need to be resolved before such a prescriptive model of general education can be
adopted. The author maintains that civic education programs in community colleges
contribute to the quality of community life and further the commitment to democratic
values and practices which is the aim of the community college.
Higginbottom, G. H. (1991). The Civic Ground of Collegiate General Education and the
Community College. (Working Paper Series No. 1-91). Binghamton, NY: Broome
Community College, Institute for Community College Research.
This report is comprised of two chapters which offer a rationale for the inclusion of civic
education as a nexus of community college general education. The first chapter provides
an introductory overview of various issues related to general education reform and the
new emphasis among educators and critics on postsecondary civic or citizenship
education. This chapter offers a historical overview of the purposes and content of
general and liberal arts education, and its role in assuring socio-cultural unity through
common learning. An argument is put forth for conceiving general education in a civic
mode as a way of mediating the liberal and vocational strains of community college
education. The current concern of academics and politicians with education's civic
agenda is discussed in the context of the lack of college students' civic knowledge and the
lack of institutional commitment to citizenship education prevalent in the 1970's and
1980's. The second chapter reviews the history of community college general/civic
education from the institution's beginnings, while focusing on the three decades
following the Truman-Johnson era (1950-1980). It also provides a critical discussion of
the civic education commitments of selected community college general education plans
connected with the curricular reforms of the 1980's. This chapter concludes with a model
of community college general/civic education which incorporates a generic collegiate
design, but is responsive to the unique circumstances of the two-year college. (AYC)
Kirby, K. (1989). Community Service and Civic Education. ERIC Digest. Bloomington,
IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education.
The authors assert that community service is a voluntary contribution to the commonweal
that teaches valuable lessons about the responsibilities of citizenship in a free society.
Vital services are provided through thousands of organizations created to meet needs not
otherwise provided for by government. Participation in these community service projects
help create a sense of concern for the public good and a commitment to voluntarism so
essential to the future of the United States. Students at every level of school can
participate in these projects and thus learn many social studies skills, including data
gathering, critical thinking, and decision making. Community service programs also
teach civic participation processes and skills, including group interaction, leadership,
cooperation, and political influence. Service activities build positive bonds between youth
and the institutions of our society and strengthen student academic performance and self-
Morse, S. W. (1989). Renewing Civic Capacity: Preparing College Students for Service
and Citizenship. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 8). Washington, DC:
Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Higher education in America has a rich tradition of preparing students for civic roles and
responsibilities, but with increased specialization, these goals have lost their emphasis in
the curriculum. This report defines responsible citizenship in a democratic society and its
requisite skills; reviews higher education's role in civic education; identifies ways
colleges and universities can help develop the skills and requirements of citizenship and
public life; and presents ways that campuses can create a new environment for learning
about the civic life, through teaching, governance, extracurricular activities, campus life,
and community relations. Six approaches to civic education are presented, including: (1)
cultural traditions and classical education, (2) community and public service and
experiential education, (3) studies of leadership, (4) general and liberal arts education, (5)
civic or public leadership education, and (6) other education such as international studies
and philanthropy.
Murchland, B., Boyte, H. C., Barber, B. R., Payton, R. L., & Hamner, C. (1992). The
American University and the Challenge of Educating for Democratic Citizenship:
A Civic Education Roundtable. Delaware, Ohio: Ohio Wesleyan University.
Arneson Institute.
The theme of this journal concerns democracy and citizenship education at universities.
An editorial, "The Postmodern Blues" (Bernard Murchland), examines the negative
citizen attitudes during the election campaign of Bill Clinton. The five civic education
roundtable articles represent two position papers and three responses. The first position
paper, "Citizenship Education and the Public World" (Harry C. Boyte), proposes that
civic education should be designed to move students to reflect on their lives and careers
in ways that allow integration of concerns with larger arenas of governance and policy.
The second position paper, "Going to the Community" (Benjamin Barber), looks at the
context for a democratic education and the choices for community service. In response to
the positions by Boyte and Barber, Craig Rimmerman raises issues of critical education
for citizenship and discusses implementation of the approach. Tim Stanton presents three
challenges that arise from work as a community organizer. Leslie Hill addresses the
issues of power and the nature of the citizen. Following the roundtable articles,
Nessel, P. (1994). Planting International Seeds. Technical Assistance Bulletin No. 12.
Chicago, IL: American Bar Association Chicago IL. Special Committee on Youth
Education for Citizenship.
Noting that law-related education (LRE) instills in its practitioners a strong desire to
share its message with the world, this technical bulletin outlines the international
activities of several LRE organizations. The Center for Civic Education hosts
international visiting scholars, sponsors an annual conference that alternates between
sites in Germany and the United States, and provides technical support to countries such
as Nicaragua and Poland. The Chicago-based, women-managed, nonprofit organization
Heartland International has promoted civic education programs in Ethiopia, Namibia,
Uganda, and Tanzania. The American Federation of Teachers International Affairs
Department created the Education for Democracy Clearinghouse in 1993 to collect and
disseminate information about civic education programs worldwide. The Mershon Center
at The Ohio State University has been involved in the Education for Democratic
Citizenship in Poland Project since 1991 and has been invited to develop programs in
Lithuania, Bulgaria, Albania, and Russia. The National Institute for Citizen Education in
the Law (NICEL) has been involved in projects on four continents, Asia, Europe, Africa,
and South America. For the future, NICEL proposes the Citizens Education Democracy
Corps, comprised of recent alumni from U.S. graduate schools in the fields of law,
education, and the humanities.
Nixon, T., & Keenan, F. (1997). Citizenship Preparation for Adult ESL Learners. ERIC
Digest. Washington, DC: Adjunct ERIC Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy
Education.
Recent levels of naturalization have reached record highs. Since 1950, most applicants
must meet strict English literacy and civics requirements. An Immigration and
Naturalization Service (INS) examiner evaluates the applicant's knowledge of U. S.
history and government, administers a short written dictation, and conducts an oral
interview. Citizenship classes are often offered within publicly-funded education
Many totalitarian communist states throughout the world have broken up during the
1990's, and citizens in those countries, from Central and South American to Central and
Eastern Europe, are working to build constitutional democracies out of the rubble. Part of
creating these new governments is devising new school curricula to include civic
education--which addresses civic knowledge, civic skills, and civic virtues--and to teach
young citizens the theory and practice of constitutional democracy. The objectives of
civic education are: (1) to teach basic ideas thoroughly so that students can discern
between an authentic constitutional democracy and a bogus one; (2) to develop
intellectual participatory skills so students can, as citizens, think and act on behalf of their
rights and the common good; and (3) to nurture civic virtues such as self-discipline,
civility, compassion, tolerance, and respect. Effective democratic teachers must develop
lessons and activities for students that emphasize and combine these three elements of
civic education in a classroom environment that promotes the theory and practice of
constitutional democracy and liberty.
Patrick, J. J. (1997). Global Trends in Civic Education for Democracy. ERIC Digest.
Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science
Education.
During the 1990s, there has been an unprecedented global dissemination of information
about the theory and practice of democracy and civic education for democracy. This
digest identifies nine trends having broad potential for influencing civic education in the
constitutional democracies of the world: (1) conceptualization of civic education in terms
of three interrelated components (civic knowledge, skills, and virtues); (2) systematic
teaching of core concepts; (3) analysis of case studies; (4) development of decision-
making skills; (5) comparative and international analysis of government and citizenship;
(6) development of participatory skills and civic virtues through cooperative learning
activities; (7) use of literature to teach civic virtues; (8) active learning of civic
knowledge, skills, and virtues; (9) conjoining of content and process in teaching and
learning of civic knowledge, skills, and virtues. (CB)
Soule, S. (2000). We the People...The Citizen and the Constitution: Knowledge of and
Support for Democratic Institutions and Processes by Participating Students.
National Finals, 2000. Calabasas, CA: Center for Civic Education Calabasas CA.
This report describes "We the People...The Citizen and the Constitution" which is an
instructional program on the history and principles of U.S. constitutional democracy for
elementary, middle school, and high school students. At the high school level, classes
may choose to enter a formal competition, advancing from congressional district and
state competitions to national finals. The competition is structured as a simulated
congressional hearing which tests students' knowledge of the United States Constitution.
In spring 2000, to assess the impact of the program on student knowledge of and support
for democratic institutions and processes, a survey was given to students (n=345)
participating in the national finals competition. The survey instrument, consisting of 43
open- and close-ended questions, incorporated questions previously administered to high
school seniors, college freshmen, and/or adults in various national surveys. The responses
of the competition's students were compared to respondents' answers on the national
surveys. Findings revealed that, as compared with various representative national
samples, students participating in the national finals competition of the "We the People..."
program possess more knowledge of U.S. democratic institutions and processes.
Soule, S. (2001). Report on Voting and Political Participation of "We the People... The
Citizen and the Constitution" Alumni. Calabasas, CA: Center for Civic Education
Calabasas CA.
In February 2001 the Center for Civic Education conducted the first survey of alumni
from the "We the People... The Citizen and the Constitution" program. Three Hundred
forty-one alumni, who were eligible to vote in November 2000, participated. Voting and
other forms of political engagement formed the core of the study. Since respondents were
self selected, findings should be considered suggestive rather than generalizable to all
alumni. Alumni were compared with a national probability study from the 2000 National
Election Studies (NES) of young people in the same age group of 18- to 30-year-olds and
also with over 260,000 college freshmen. This report documents the survey results, which
indicate that the alumni surveyed are better informed and participate at higher rates than
their peers. Additionally, data suggest that effective civic education may increase voter
turnout among youth.
The serial "Center Stage" is designed to provide a forum for the presentation and
discussion of effective teaching methods, ideas, and experiences of the faculty at Broome
Community College (BCC), in Binghamton, New York. Volume 3 includes seven issues,
focusing on the following themes: (1) human discovery, including articles on "Columbus
and the Discovery of Discovery," the nature works of Barry Lopez, and reading and
writing assignments on the discovery theme; (2) moral reasoning and ethical issues; (3)
personal perspectives on assessment, including outcomes assessment and portfolio
assessment; (4) multicultural education, including articles on foreign language
instruction, cross-cultural linkages, and transcultural nursing; (5) a celebration of teachers
and teaching at BCC; (6) problem solving, including articles on myths about problem
solving, useful problem solving characteristics, problem solving in tech-prep and in the
workplace, and using problem solving to teach problem solving; and (7) civic education,
including articles on promoting civic competence, the meaning of democracy, and
community service.
This report provides an overview of the Department of Education's (ED) progress toward
four main goals: (1) help all children reach challenging academic standards so they are
prepared for responsible citizenship, further learning, and productive employment; (2)
build a solid foundation for learning for all children; (3) ensure access to postsecondary
education and lifelong learning; and (4) make ED a high-performance organization by
focusing on results, service quality, and customer satisfaction. The report was created to
meet the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act. The volume
contains information on education reform and is divided into 16 sections. These sections
cover the following topics: education reform; education for disadvantaged children;
impact aid; school-improvement programs; reading excellence programs; Indian
education; school-renovation programs; bilingual and immigrant education; special
education; rehabilitation services and special institutions; student financial assistance;
vocational and adult education; higher education; education research, statistics, and
improvement; Office for Civil Rights; and Office of the Inspector General. Some of the
programs that are discussed include school-to-work opportunities, migrant education,
teaching to high standards, state grants, the foreign-language assistance program, state
Wellman, J. V. (1999). Contributing to the Civic Good: Assessing and Accounting for the
Civic Contributions of Higher Education. (The New Millennium Project Working
Paper). Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
This work examines in detail how higher education serves the larger public good,
focusing on how higher education assesses and accounts for its service to society. It
begins with a brief description of how the civic education of students and institutional
service to society are defined for the purposes of this paper. It then discusses assessment
and accountability strategies, including the kinds of measures that tend to be the focus of
most public reporting strategies. The civic education and service roles of higher
education are not usually the focus of public reporting. When civic contributions are
assessed, something else, whether service learning, campus, climate, student diversity, or
"service" to the community, is measured. To build assessments of the civic contributions
of higher education into reports of accountability, there are some obstacles that must be
overcome. Wellman identifies those obstacles and presents some strategies to build
assessment and accountability capacities for the civic roles of higher education. The
strategies are drawn from assessment models currently being used to measure specific
dimensions of campuses' civic roles and activities.
Babchuk, C., Babchuk, D., Boggs, S., & al., e. (1991). Midwest Research-to-Practice
Conference (No. 10 ). (Collected Works--Conference Proceedings [and]
Addendum). Minneapolis, Minnesota: Minnesota University, College of
Education.
Bahmueller, C. F., & Patrick, J. J. E. (1999). Principles and Practices of Education for
Democratic Citizenship: International Perspectives and Projects. Bloomington,
IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education.
Boggs, D. L. (1992). Adult Civic Education. ERIC Digest No. 129. Columbus, OH: ERIC
Clearinghouse on Adult Career and Vocational Education.
Boyer, E. L., & Hechinger, F. M. (1981). Higher Learning in the Nation's Service: A
Carnegie Foundation Essay. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the
Advancement of Teaching.
Brown, D. W. E. (1997). Higher Education Exchange 1997. Dayton, Ohio: Charles F.
Kettering Foundation.
Butts, R. F. (1989). The Civic Mission in Educational Reform: Perspectives for the
Public and the Profession. (Education and Society Series). U.S.; California.
Butts, R. F. (1993). In the First Person Singular: The Foundations of Education. U.S.;
California.
Cabello, B. (1998). CIVITAS: An International Civic Education Exchange Program.
(Evaluation Report). Calabasas, CA: Center for Civic Education.
Campbell, D. E. (1999). Steps towards Sustainability. Inter-American Foundation: 1999
in Review, October 1, 1998 to September 30, 1999. Arlington, VA: Inter-
American Foundation.
Christenson, M. E., Johnston, M. E., & Norris, J. E. (2001). Teaching Together:
School/University Collaboration To Improve Social Studies Education. (NCSS
Bulletin 98). Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
Cooperative Education Association. (1997). Expanding boundaries : building civic
responsibility within higher education. Volume II, Spring, 1997. Columbia, MD:
Cooperative Education Association.
De Cecco, J. P. (1970). Civic education for the seventies: An alternative to repression
and revolution. Washington, DC: Bureau of Comprehensive and Vocational
Education Research, U.S. Office of Education, Dept. of Health Education and
Welfare.
Demaine, J. E., & Entwistle, H. E. (1996). Beyond Communitarianism: Citizenship,
Politics and Education. U.S.; New York.
Eisenberg Associates for the American Association of Community and Junior Colleges.
(1989). Civic Responsibility and the American Student: The Challenges and
Opportunities of National Service. (The American Seminar VI: Teleconference
Workbook). Washington, DC: American Association of Community and Junior
Colleges.
Ekman, R. (1985, April). A Brief History of the Effects of Social Institutions on the Civic
Values of American Youth (Paper presented at the Conference on the
Reports: Civic Education
Kellogg Forum on Higher Education for the Public Good
Annotated Bibliography Project
45
Development of Civic Competence and Civic Responsibility among Youth).
Irsee, West Germany.
Green, T. F., & et al. (1969-03-00). Some Aspects of Socialization Through Formal
Schooling Relating Primarily to Civic and Moral Education. Final Report.
Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ. NY. School of Education.
Higginbottom, G. H. (1986). Civic Education in the Community College (Working Paper
Series No. 1-86). Binghamton, NY: Broome Community College, Institute for
Community College Research.
Higginbottom, G. H. (1991). The Civic Ground of Collegiate General Education and the
Community College. (Working Paper Series No. 1-91). Binghamton, NY: Broome
Community College, Institute for Community College Research.
Kirby, K. (1989). Community Service and Civic Education. ERIC Digest. Bloomington,
IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education.
Martin, L. E. (1994). Proceedings of the Annual Midwest Research-to-Practice
Conference in Adult, Continuing and Community Education (13th, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin, October 13-15, 1994). Madison, Wisconsin: Wisconsin University.
Mathews, D. (1998). Creating More Public Space in Higher Education. Washington, DC:
Council on Public Policy Education.
McAllister, E. (1986). The Marquis de Condorcet and Thomas Jefferson: revolutionary
proposals for civic education in the eighteenth century.
Morse, S. W. (1989). Renewing Civic Capacity: Preparing College Students for Service
and Citizenship. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 8). Washington, DC:
Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Murchland, B., Boyte, H. C., Barber, B. R., Payton, R. L., & Hamner, C. (1992). The
American University and the Challenge of Educating for Democratic Citizenship:
A Civic Education Roundtable. Delaware, Ohio: Ohio Wesleyan University.
Arneson Institute.
Nessel, P. (1994). Planting International Seeds. Technical Assistance Bulletin No. 12.
Chicago, IL: American Bar Association Chicago IL. Special Committee on Youth
Education for Citizenship.
Nixon, T., & Keenan, F. (1997). Citizenship Preparation for Adult ESL Learners. ERIC
Digest. Washington, DC: Adjunct ERIC Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy
Education.
Patrick, J. J. (1995). Civic Education for Constitutional Democracy: An International
Perspective. ERIC Digest. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social
Studies/Social Science Education.
Patrick, J. J. (1996a). Community and Individuality in Civic Education for Democracy.
U.S.; Indiana.
Patrick, J. J. (1996b). National Standards as Reflectors and Directors of Practices in
Civic Education in the U.S.A. U.S.; Indiana.
Patrick, J. J. (1997a). Global Trends in Civic Education for Democracy. ERIC Digest.
Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science
Education.