World Overview
World Overview
World Overview
China
The Chinese government plans to increase nuclear
generating capacity to 58 GWe with 30 GWe more under
construction by 2021. China has completed construction and
commenced operation of over 30 new nuclear power reactors
since 2002, and some 20 new reactors are under
construction. These include the world's first four
Westinghouse AP1000 units and a demonstration high-
temperature gas-cooled reactor plant. Many more are
planned, with construction due to start within about three
years. China is commencing export marketing of a largely
indigenous reactor design. R&D on nuclear reactor
technology in China is second to none.
India
India’s target is to have 14.5 GWe nuclear capacity on line by
2020 as part of its national energy policy. These reactors
include light- and heavy water reactors as well as fast
reactors. In addition to the 22 on line, of both indigenous and
foreign design, five power reactors are under construction,
including a 500 MWe prototype fast breeder reactor. This will
take India's ambitious thorium programme to stage 2, and set
the scene for eventual utilization of the country's abundant
thorium to fuel reactors.
Russia
Russia plans to increase its nuclear capacity to 30.5 GWe by
2020, using its world-class light water reactors. A large fast
breeder unit, the country's second, is producing power and
development proceeds on others. An initial floating power
plant is under construction, with delivery due in 2018. Russia
leads the world in nuclear reactor exports, building and
financing new nuclear power plants in several countries.
Europe
Finland and France are both expanding their fleets of nuclear
power plants with the 1650 MWe EPR from Areva, two of
which are also being built in China. Several countries in
Eastern Europe are currently constructing or have firm plans
to build new nuclear power plants (Bulgaria, Czech Republic,
Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Turkey).
United States
In the USA, there are four reactors under construction, all new
AP1000 designs. One of the reasons for the hiatus in new
build in the USA to date has been the extremely successful
evolution in maintenance strategies. Over the last 15 years,
changes have increased utilization of US nuclear power
plants, with the increased output corresponding to 19 new
1000 MW plants being built.
South America
Argentina and Brazil both have commercial nuclear reactors
generating electricity, and additional reactors are under
construction. Chile has a research reactor in operation and
has the infrastructure and intention to build commercial
reactors.
South Korea
South Korea has three new reactors under construction
domestically as well as four in UAE. It plans for eight more. It
is also involved in intense research on future reactor designs.
SE Asia
Vietnam intends to have it first nuclear power plant operating
about 2028 with Russian help and a second soon after with
Japanese input. Indonesia and Thailand are planning nuclear
power programs.
South Asia
Bangladesh has contracted with Russia to build its first
nuclear power plant. Pakistan with Chinese help is building
three small reactors inland and two large ones near Karachi.
Central Asia
Kazakhstan with its abundance of uranium is working closely
with Russia in planning development of small new reactors for
its own use and export.
Middle East
The United Arab Emirates is building four 1450 MWe South
Korean reactors at a cost of over $20 billion and is
collaborating closely with IAEA and experienced international
firms. Iran’s first power reactor is in operation, and more are
planned.
Africa
South Africa is committed to plans for 9600 MWe of further
nuclear power capacity.
New countries
In September 2012 the International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA) expected seven newcomer countries to launch nuclear
programs in the near term. It did not name these, but
Lithuania, UAE, Turkey, Belarus, Vietnam, Poland, and
Bangladesh appear likely candidates. Others had stepped
back from commitment, needed more time to set up
infrastructure, or did not have credible finance.
Sources:
WNA, data to publication date.
IAEA.
Nuclear Engineering International, (load factors)
Nuclear power ‘a
good option’ for
PH—Cusi
SHARES: 517
VIEW COMMENTS
By: Tarra Quismundo
@TarraINQ
Philippine Daily Inquirer
Energy Secretary Alfonso Cusi said this before the Senate on Wednesday as
he bared that the Department of Energy (DOE) has initiated a study on the
possible utility of the mothballed Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP).
“The hard fact is that even while nuclear power is unpopular, we’re looking
at it, we’re studying it. It’s an option,” he told the hearing chair by Sen.
Sherwin Gatchalian.
He said the nuclear option was under consideration as the DOE endeavors to
build a 30,189 megawatt (MW) reliable supply for the country by 2030,
given the forecast demand and anticipated economic growth.
Cusi pointed out that nuclear power was viable as it is cheap to produce and
has greater longevity than other depletable sources such as natural gas and
coal.
“Coal and fuel has a lifespan. Nuclear power has a longer life, so we will
have a more secure [supply]. The hard fact is that we know that nuclear
power is not popular, but it is our responsibility to look at it and study it for
nation-builiding,” he said.
He cited the wide use of nuclear power in other countries, including
Indonesia, where the Philippines sources its coal.
The BNPP, built in the 1970s at $2 billion, has never produced a single
kilowatt, as Sen. Richard Gordon noted. It has been maintained at an annual
cost of P27 million.
Cusi said the DOE will “go through the process” in deciding on its operation,
adding that the public will be consulted about the option. Opening the power
plant will cost an estimated $1 billion. RAM
Read more:http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/811351/nuclear-power-a-good-option-for-ph-
cusi#ixzz4JFg5HJi2
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter |inquirerdotnet on Facebook
BUSINESS
region
KYODO
SEP 2, 2016
ARTICLE HISTORY
PRINT
SHARE
Nuclear energy is back on the government’s list of possible alternatives for power
generation in the future, according to the Department of Energy, as it faces stiff
opposition from environmentalists and various militant groups.
Energy Secretary Carlos Jericho L. Petilla stressed that even before he was appointed
to his current position, he was already looking at nuclear energy as a possible power
source option.
“We’re looking at it on a long-term basis. We’re counting on [nuclear as an option].
At the same time, we have to look at the technical side, and then recommend later on
if studies show that it’s good for the country,” Petilla said.
“In the end however, we always have to [consider] social acceptability. One thing I
can guarantee, nuclear power will have a level playing field, but we just need to take
into account social acceptability,” he added.
Petilla said that it is this social dimension—or the possible non-acceptance of nuclear
energy by the public—that is currently limiting the government from including it in its
energy mix.
“Nuclear is not in the energy mix today. The major advantage of nuclear power
generation is that it’s cheap—you’re talking generation of P2.50 to P3 per kilowatt-
hour, compared to today’s generation of P5 a kWh and up. Another advantage of
nuclear is that it’s clean, meaning no emissions,” he further explained.
The energy reform agenda, which was formulated during the term of Petilla’s
predecessor, Cabinet Secretary Jose Rene D. Almendras, stated that the DOE planned
to implement a national nuclear power program, and even set 2025 as the target year
for the start of operations of the proposed 2,000-megawatt nuclear facility.
The target will clearly be pushed back to a later date as the Philippines has not even
started with the program and is awaiting for advances in technology, particularly those
that deal with safety.
Last year, the Philippine government was studying the possible conversion of the
mothballed 630-megawatt Bataan nuclear power plant (BNPP) into either a coal-fired
or natural gas-fed facility.
Based on the initial findings of the Department of Science and Technology (DOST)—
the agency tasked to look for the technology and fuel type that would best suit the
BNPP—a conversion to coal would be more feasible.
The BNPP was built during the Marcos era by Westinghouse Electric at a cost of $2.2
billion. It was mothballed in 1986 due to safety concerns, even before it could begin
operations.
The structure is now dilapidated and outdated
Show map
Philippines - Country Profile
Biodiversity Facts
Status and trends of biodiversity, including benefits from
biodiversity and ecosystem services
The Philippines is one of 18 mega-biodiverse countries of the world, containing
two-thirds of the earth’s biodiversity and between 70% and 80% of the world’s
plant and animal species. The Philippines ranks fifth in the number of plant
species and maintains 5% of the world’s flora. Species endemism is very high,
covering at least 25 genera of plants and 49% of terrestrial wildlife, while the
country ranks fourth in bird endemism. The Philippines is also one of the world’s
biodiversity hotspots with at least 700 threatened species, thus making it one of
the top global conservation areas. The national list of threatened faunal species
was established in 2004 and includes 42 species of land mammals, 127 species
of birds, 24 species of reptiles and 14 species of amphibians. In terms of fishes,
the Philippines counts at least 3,214 species, of which about 121 are endemic
and 76 threatened. In 2007, an administrative order issued by the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources established a national list of threatened
plant species, indicating that 99 species were critically endangered, 187 were
endangered, 176 vulnerable as well as 64 other threatened species.
The trend is similar for inland water biodiversity, with findings indicating a
decreasing trend in water quality, fish, biodiversity and cultural value in the
country’s largest lake (Laguna de Bay) and its tributary rivers. The Philippines
presents unique coastal, marine and island biodiversity. It is indeed located
within the Coral Triangle, at the center of highest marine biodiversity. A study
conducted in 2005 noted that there is a higher concentration of species per unit
area in the country than anywhere in Indonesia and Wallacea. Yet this
ecosystem is also greatly at risk. While the 2005 review of the state of the marine
and coastal environment indicated an increase in the mangrove cover, reef
cover, seagrass cover and fishery production are nowadays decreasing
substantially.
The Philippines derives large benefits from ecosystems. In particular, the country
recognizes the important role played by watersheds, river basins and coastal
areas in the environment and in society as a source of livelihood (supporting
fisheries, recreation and tourism and many other activities). For instance, a
watershed with adequate forest cover provides water that supports lowland
agriculture, prevents soil erosion and siltation of coasts and water bodies, and
sustains the supply of surface and groundwater for domestic use. Likewise, the
forest ecosystem provides ecological services that benefit agriculture, industries,
water and power needs. Production forest areas for tree plantations and
agroforestry activities are sources of jobs and revenues, with agriculture having
represented 18.4% of the country’s GDP in 2007.
The updating of the NBSAP is on-going. The process builds on the current status
and achievements of the Philippines with respect to biodiversity planning and
reporting. It aims to integrate the Philippines’ obligations under the CBD into its
national development and sectoral planning frameworks through a renewed and
participative ‘biodiversity planning’ and strategizing process. It is expected to
produce measurable targets for biodiversity conservation and sustainable use.
Interim biodiversity targets were also incorporated into the Philippine
Development Plan (2011-2016).
Since then, several initiatives have been launched, notably in terms of integrated
watershed management. Moreover, Executive Order 533 (2006) mandated the
adoption of integrated coastal management (ICM), with a recent review indicating
that significant resources had been invested into ICM, with the participation of
various stakeholders, and that several concerns were taken into account, ranging
from poverty alleviation to food security and sustainable development.