Bugcrowd Vulnerability Rating Taxonomy 1.7
Bugcrowd Vulnerability Rating Taxonomy 1.7
v1.7-
v1.6 -Mar.
Nov.25, 2019
2, 2018
©Bugcrowd 2019
2018
THE METHODOLOGY USAGE GUIDE:
At the beginning of 2016, we released the Bugcrowd Vulnerability Rating The VRT is intended to provide valuable information for bug bounty each week, as examining some of the most difficult to validate bugs serves as
Taxonomy (VRT) in an effort to further bolster transparency and communication, stakeholders. It is important that we identify the ways in which we use it a unique learning exercise.
as well as to contribute valuable and actionable content to the bug bounty successfully, and what considerations should be kept in mind.
community. This specific document will be updated on an ongoing basis.
Bugcrowd’s VRT is a resource outlining Bugcrowd’s baseline severity rating, The Severity Rating is a Baseline
including certain edge cases, for vulnerabilities that we see often. To arrive The recommended severity, from P1 to P5, is a baseline. That having been Communication is King
at this baseline rating, Bugcrowd’s security engineers started with generally said, while this severity rating might apply without context, it’s possible that Having cut-and-dry baseline ratings, as defined by our VRT, make rating bugs
accepted industry impact and further considered the average acceptance application complexity, bounty brief restrictions, or unusual impact could a faster and less difficult process. We have to remember, however, that strong
rate, average priority, and commonly requested program-specific exclusions result in a different rating. As a customer, it’s important to weigh the VRT communication is the most powerful tool for anyone running or participating
(based on business use cases) across all of Bugcrowd’s programs. alongside your internal application security ratings. in a bug bounty.
For bug hunters, if you think a bug’s impact warrants reporting despite the Both sides of the bug bounty equation must exist in balance. When in doubt,
VRT’s guidelines, or that the customer has misunderstood the threat scenario, ask dumb questions, be verbose, and more generally, behave in a way that
Implications For Bug Hunters we encourage you to submit the issue regardless and use the Bugcrowd allows you and your bounty opposite to foster a respectful relationship. As a
Bugcrowd’s VRT is an invaluable resource for bug hunters as it outlines the Crowdcontrol commenting system to clearly communicate your reasoning. customer, keep in mind that every bug takes time and effort to find. As a bounty
types of issues that are normally seen and accepted by bug bounty programs. hunter, try to remember that every bug’s impact is ultimately determined by
We hope that being transparent about the typical severity level for various bug the customer’s environment and use cases.
types will help bug bounty participants save valuable time and effort in their Low Severity Does Not Imply Insignificance
quest to make bounty targets more secure. The VRT can also help researchers For customers, it’s important to recognize that the base severity rating
identify which types of high-value bugs they have overlooked, and when to does not equate to “industry accepted impact.” This rating is defined by our One Size Doesn’t Fit All
provide exploitation information (POC info) in a report where it might impact Security Operations Team and our VRT is a living document - see the following While this taxonomy maps bugs to the OWASP Top Ten and the OWASP Mobile
priority. point about the “VRT Council.” Your internal teams or engineers might Top Ten to add more contextual information, additional meta-data could
assess certain bugs – especially those designated P4 or P5 within the VRT – include CWE or WASC, among others. As always, the program owner retains all
Interested in becoming a Bugcrowd researcher? Join the crowd. differently. As a bug hunter, it’s important to not discount lower severity bugs, rights to choose final bug prioritization levels.
as many bug hunters have used such bugs within “exploit chains” consisting
Implications For Customers of two or three bugs resulting in creative, valid, and high-impact submissions.
The VRT helps customers gain a more comprehensive understanding of bug
bounties. The following information in this document will help our customers
understand the impact of a given vulnerability, assist any adjustments Importance of a VRT Council
to a bounty scope, and provides insight to write a clear bounty brief. Bugcrowd reviews proposed changes to the VRT every week at an operations
During remediation, the VRT will help business units across the board in meeting with “VRT Council.” We use this time to discuss new vulnerabilities,
communicating the severity of identified security issues. edge cases for existing vulnerabilities, technical severity level adjustments,
v1.7- Mar. 25, 2019 and to share general bug validation knowledge. When the team comes to a
consensus regarding each proposed change, it is committed to the master
version. Members of the Security Operations team look forward to this meeting
v1.7-
v1.6 Mar.2,25,
- Nov. 2019
2018
©Bugcrowd 2019
2018
Priority OWASP Top Ten + Bugcrowd Extras Specific Vulnerability Name Variant or Affected Function
Sensitive Data Exposure Weak Password Reset Implementation Token Leakage via Host Header Poisoning
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Stored Non-Privileged User to Anyone
Broken Access Control (BAC) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Internal High Impact
Server Security Misconfiguration Mail Server Misconfiguration No Spoofing Protection on Email Domain
P3
Broken Authentication and Session Management Second Factor Authentication (2FA) Bypass
Broken Authentication and Session Management Weak Login Function HTTPS not Available or HTTP by Default
CONTINUED
Broken Authentication and Session Management Session Fixation Remote Attack Vector
Sensitive Data Exposure EXIF Geolocation Data Not Stripped From Uploaded Images Automatic User Enumeration
Broken Access Control (BAC) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Internal Scan and/or Medium Impact
Application-Level Denial-of-Service (DoS) High Impact and/or Medium Difficulty
Client-Side Injection Binary Planting Default Folder Privilege Escalation
Automotive Security Misconfiguration Infotainment Code Execution (No CAN Bus Pivot)
Server Security Misconfiguration Mail Server Misconfiguration Email Spoofing to Inbox due to Missing or Misconfigured DMARC on Email Domain
Server Security Misconfiguration Database Management System (DBMS) Misconfiguration Excessively Privileged User / DBA
Server Security Misconfiguration Missing Secure or HTTPOnly Cookie Flag Session Token
Server Security Misconfiguration Web Application Firewall (WAF) Bypass Direct Server Access
P4
Broken Authentication and Session Management Weak Login Function Other Plaintext Protocol with no Secure Alternative
Broken Authentication and Session Management Weak Login Function LAN Only
CONTINUED
Broken Authentication and Session Management Weak Login Function HTTP and HTTPS Available
Broken Authentication and Session Management Failure to Invalidate Session On Logout (Client and Server-Side)
Broken Authentication and Session Management Failure to Invalidate Session On Password Reset and/or Change
Broken Authentication and Session Management Weak Registration Implementation Over HTTP
Sensitive Data Exposure EXIF Geolocation Data Not Stripped From Uploaded Images Manual User Enumeration
Sensitive Data Exposure Visible Detailed Error/Debug Page Detailed Server Configuration
Sensitive Data Exposure Token Leakage via Referer Untrusted 3rd Party
Sensitive Data Exposure Weak Password Reset Implementation Password Reset Token Sent Over HTTP
Insecure Data Storage Sensitive Application Data Stored Unencrypted On External Storage
P4
CONTINUED
Mobile Security Misconfiguration
Infotainment
On Sensitive Content
Same-Site Scripting
Non-Sensitive Data Exposure
Server Security Misconfiguration Misconfigured DNS Missing Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Record
Server Security Misconfiguration Mail Server Misconfiguration Email Spoofing to Spam Folder
Server Security Misconfiguration Mail Server Misconfiguration Missing or Misconfigured SPF and/or DKIM
Server Security Misconfiguration Mail Server Misconfiguration Email Spoofing on non-email domain
Server Security Misconfiguration Missing Secure or HTTPOnly Cookie Flag Non-Session Cookie
P5
CONTINUED
Server Security Misconfiguration
Insecure SSL
TRACE
Server Security Misconfiguration Lack of Security Headers Cache-Control for a Non-Sensitive Page
Broken Authentication and Session Management Weak Login Function Not Operational or Intended Public Access
Broken Authentication and Session Management Session Fixation Local Attack Vector
Broken Authentication and Session Management Failure to Invalidate Session On Logout (Server-Side Only)
Broken Authentication and Session Management Failure to Invalidate Session Concurrent Sessions On Logout
Broken Authentication and Session Management Failure to Invalidate Session On Email Change
Broken Authentication and Session Management Failure to Invalidate Session Long Timeout
v1.7- Mar. 25, 2019 Broken Authentication and Session Management Concurrent Logins
©Bugcrowd 2019
2018
Priority OWASP Top Ten + Bugcrowd Extras Specific Vulnerability Name Variant or Affected Function
Sensitive Data Exposure Visible Detailed Error/Debug Page Full Path Disclosure
P5
CONTINUED
Sensitive Data Exposure
Sensitive Data Exposure Token Leakage via Referer Trusted 3rd Party
Sensitive Data Exposure Sensitive Token in URL In the Background
Sensitive Data Exposure Sensitive Token in URL On Password Reset
Sensitive Data Exposure Non-Sensitive Token in URL
Sensitive Data Exposure Mixed Content (HTTPS Sourcing HTTP)
Sensitive Data Exposure Sensitive Data Hardcoded OAuth Secret
Sensitive Data Exposure Sensitive Data Hardcoded File Paths
Sensitive Data Exposure Internal IP Disclosure
Sensitive Data Exposure JSON Hijacking
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Stored Self
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Reflected Self
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Cookie-Based
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) IE-Only XSS Filter Disabled
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) IE-Only Older Version (< IE11)
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) TRACE Method
Broken Access Control (BAC) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) DNS Query Only
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Action-Specific Logout
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) CSRF Token Not Unique Per Request
Application-Level Denial-of-Service (DoS) App Crash Malformed Android Intents
Application-Level Denial-of-Service (DoS) App Crash Malformed iOS URL Schemes
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards Open Redirect POST-Based
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards Open Redirect Header-Based
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards Open Redirect Flash-Based
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards Tabnabbing
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards Lack of Security Speed Bump Page
External Behavior Browser Feature Plaintext Password Field
v1.7- Mar. 25, 2019
External Behavior Browser Feature Save Password
©Bugcrowd 2019
2018
Priority OWASP Top Ten + Bugcrowd Extras Specific Vulnerability Name Variant or Affected Function
External Behavior Browser Feature Autocomplete Enabled
P5
CONTINUED
External Behavior
External Behavior
Browser Feature
Browser Feature
Autocorrect Enabled
Aggressive Offline Caching
External Behavior CSV Injection
External Behavior Captcha Bypass Crowdsourcing
External Behavior System Clipboard Leak Shared Links
External Behavior User Password Persisted in Memory
Insufficient Security Configurability Weak Password Policy
Insufficient Security Configurability Weak Password Reset Implementation Token is Not Invalidated After Email Change
Insufficient Security Configurability Weak Password Reset Implementation Token is Not Invalidated After Password Change
Insufficient Security Configurability Weak Password Reset Implementation Token Has Long Timed Expiry
Insufficient Security Configurability Weak Password Reset Implementation Token is Not Invalidated After New Token is Requested
Insufficient Security Configurability Weak Password Reset Implementation Token is Not Invalidated After Login
Insufficient Security Configurability Lack of Verification Email
Insufficient Security Configurability Lack of Notification Email
Insufficient Security Configurability Weak Registration Implementation Allows Disposable Email Addresses
Insufficient Security Configurability Weak 2FA Implementation Missing Failsafe
Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities Outdated Software Version
Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities Captcha Bypass OCR (Optical Character Recognition)
Insecure Data Storage Sensitive Application Data Stored Unencrypted On Internal Storage
Insecure Data Storage Non-Sensitive Application Data Stored Unencrypted
Insecure Data Storage Screen Caching Enabled
Lack of Binary Hardening Lack of Exploit Mitigations
Lack of Binary Hardening Lack of Jailbreak Detection
Lack of Binary Hardening Lack of Obfuscation
Lack of Binary Hardening Runtime Instrumentation-Based
Insecure Data Transport Executable Download Secure Integrity Check
Network Security Misconfiguration Telnet Enabled
Mobile Security Misconfiguration SSL Certificate Pinning Absent
Mobile Security Misconfiguration SSL Certificate Pinning Defeatable
Mobile Security Misconfiguration Tapjacking
Mobile Security Misconfiguration Clipboard Enabled On Non-Sensitive Content
Client-Side Injection Binary Planting Non-Default Folder Privilege Escalation
Client-Side Injection Binary Planting No Privilege Escalation
v1.7- Mar. 25, 2019 Automotive Security Misconfiguration RF Hub Roll Jam ©Bugcrowd 2019
2018
Priority OWASP Top Ten + Bugcrowd Extras Specific Vulnerability Name Variant or Affected Function
Automotive Security Misconfiguration RF Hub Replay
Automotive Security Misconfiguration RF Hub Relay
We believe in growth and transparency for security and bug bounty communities and see the release of our VRT as a tool 0.1 - February 5, 2016
that may help align expectations between researchers and program owners across ALL programs. Much of our employees’ Original 1.4 - April 13, 2018
expertise in validating and rating thousands of submissions across hundreds of managed bounties is distilled into this This release includes new entries that address missing, but commonly
document, making it a key component of Bugcrowd’s managed services. Our VRT is a living document that changes constantly 0.2 - March 23, 2016 reported classes of issues, the removal of a few entries, and updated entry
in response to discussions at our VRT Council. Divided the Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) entries to provide additional granularity names to reduce ambiguity. Additionaly, minor baseline severity rating
that captures priority variations for XSS within applications with multiple user adjustments were made along with increased granularity to some categories
As our first and foremost goal is usability, the VRT is not exhaustive. We believe that foregoing extreme technical depth for privilege levels. to assist our ASEs with more precise triage guidance. To submit suggested
usability in creating such a community resource is a worthwhile tradeoff. We’re confident that a security engineer using our changes, edits, or additions to the VRT, use our open source taxonomy found
VRT as a guide can triage and run a successful bug bounty program. 0.4 - November 18, 2016 at github.com/bugcrowd/vulnerability-rating-taxonomy.
Minor priority changes, minor additions and subtractions, and typo fixes.
Happy Hunting, Switched to a formal versioning system. 1.5 - October 1, 2018
The latest version includes improving transparency by adding multiple entries
Bugcrowd Security Operations Team 1.0 - February 24, 2017 for commonly reported issues. Additionally, aligning the baseline severity
Major changes to taxonomy structure with the addition of top-level rating to best reflect the market by increasing taxonomy grunularity. And lastly,
Follow us at @Bugcrowd and continue the discussion on our forum. categorizations to provide flexibility for context-dependent severity ratings. we added designated variants for vulnerabilities that require Flash including
With this update we also launched our web-based taxonomy at bugcrowd. some cases of XSS or open redirects. Read more about it on our blog here.
com/vrt. Read more about it on our blog here.
1.6 - November 2, 2018
1.1 - May 5, 2017 Last VRT Council led us to deciding that we need to expedite the release of VRT
Substantial additions, some priority changes, minor subtractions, and typo 1.6. The release includes two changes: revision to internal SSRF and how we
fixes. With this update we also released the open source taxonomy which rate email spoofing, more specifically the baselines around SPF and DMARC.
can be found at github.com/bugcrowd/vulnerability-rating- These changes are a result of how major providers, such as Outlook, Gmail, and
taxonomy Read more about it on our blog here. some other large email providers started to disregard the SPF standard and rely
on DMARC. What this means is that if you don’t have DMARC set up on your
1.2 - August 4, 2017 email domain, spoofed emails will land in people’s inbox even if there’s SPF.
This update includes priority changes (most notable changes GET-based open Read more at https://github.com/bugcrowd/vulnerability-rating-
redirects now set as P4, as well as all existing weak password policies as P5 taxonomy.
“informational”), a few additions , and some minor modifications to increase
the clarity of the taxonomy and align it with the security industry. Read more 1.7 - March 25, 2019 (Current Version)
about it on our blog here. The latest version of VRT includes specific security misconfiguration
vulnerabilities for the automotive industry as well as revisions for Sensitive
1.3 - September 28, 2017 Data Exposure and Insufficient Security Configurability. Read more at https://
Addition of VRT to CVSS v3 mapping as well as Broken Access Control github.com/bugcrowd/vulnerability-rating-taxonomy.
category, aligned with the OWASP top 10 2017 release candidate. Revisions
of VRT entries were made to provide better transparency for researchers and
consistent triaging guidance. Read more about it on our blog here.
v1.7-
v1.6 -Mar.
Nov.25, 2019
2, 2018
©Bugcrowd 2019
2018