Scribd
Upload
70 views3 pages

Physics Seminar Rubric (Report Assesment)

This document contains three evaluation rubrics for a student seminar presentation, research paper, and overall work throughout a term. The rubrics assess content, presentation quality, writing quality, difficulty level, progress, initiative, organization, ethics, knowledge, and skills. Scores are given on a scale of 0 to 4 for each criterion, with total scores corresponding to letter grades. The evaluator uses these rubrics to provide structured feedback and assessment of the student's work.

Uploaded by

Waterdrop' 'Dew
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
70 views3 pages

Physics Seminar Rubric (Report Assesment)

This document contains three evaluation rubrics for a student seminar presentation, research paper, and overall work throughout a term. The rubrics assess content, presentation quality, writing quality, difficulty level, progress, initiative, organization, ethics, knowledge, and skills. Scores are given on a scale of 0 to 4 for each criterion, with total scores corresponding to letter grades. The evaluator uses these rubrics to provide structured feedback and assessment of the student's work.

Uploaded by

Waterdrop' 'Dew
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Seminar Presentation

Student _____________________________

Evaluator ___________________________

Does not Meets Meets


meet criterion criterion
criterion somewhat fully
Content
Background/Intro is sufficient to 0 1 2
understand how this project fits
into larger field
Description of methodology is 0 2 4
sufficient for audience to
understand the procedure
Explanations are 0 1 2
understandable/clear
Highlights of results are 0 2 4
described
Conclusions stated are supported 0 2 4
by the analysis
Errors/Uncertainties are 0 2 4
presented correctly
References/Sources are cited 0 1 2
correctly
Audience questions are answered 0 1 2
honestly (i.e. no bluffing or
guessing)
Presentation Quality
Speaking is understandable/clear 0 1 2
Speaker is composed 0 1 2
Speaker can answer questions 0 1 2
professionally
Speaker makes eye contact with 0 1 2
audience
Speaker uses professional body 0 1 2
language
Visuals/PPT are clear and 0 1 2
readable
Visuals/PPT have appropriate 0 1 2
amount of text, diagrams
Visuals/PPT are free of 0 1 2
errors/typos
Total

38-42 A Comments:
33-37 B
28-32 C
23-27 D
Paper
Student _____________________________

Evaluator ___________________________

Does not Meets Meets


meet criterion criterion
criterion somewhat fully
Content
Abstract is meaningful 0 1 2
Inquiry question is clearly stated 0 1 2
Background/Intro is described 0 2 4
sufficiently to understand the
project
Background information is 0 1 2
correct
Experimental design is described 0 2 4
sufficiently and includes
appropriate figures
Results/Data are stated 0 2 4
completely
Conclusions show evidence of 0 2 4
critical thinking
Errors/Uncertainties are 0 2 4
analyzed correctly
Graphs/diagrams are labeled 0 1 2
completely
Graphs/diagrams include error 0 1 2
bars, units
References/Sources are cited 0 2 4
correctly
At least one reference is from a 0 1 2
journal
Problems encountered are 0 2 4
described with attempted
solutions
Writing Quality
Grammar is correct 0 1 2
Spelling is correct 0 1 2
Paper format is clear 0 1 2
Ideas are presented clearly 0 2 4
Paper was delivered to reader in 0 1 2
a timely manner
Total

47-52 A Comments:
41-46 B
35-40 C
29-34 D
Student’s Work Throughout Term
Student _____________________________

Advisor _____________________________

Does not Meets Meets


meet criterion criterion
criterion somewhat fully
Difficulty level of chosen project 0 1 2
was appropriate
Student spent sufficient time on 0 1 2
project
Student made consistent progress 0 2 4
(i.e. not all at the last minute)
Student took initiative 0 1 2
Student was organized in 0 1 2
methodology
Student practiced ethical 0 1 2
behavior
Student showed 0 1 2
curiosity/enthusiasm for project
Student showed content 0 2 4
knowledge gained from previous
physics coursework
Student showed skills gained 0 2 4
from previous physics
coursework
Total

22-24 A Comments:
20-22 B
17-20 C
14-16 D

You might also like