PACS Numbers: 71.15.Mb
PACS Numbers: 71.15.Mb
4 August 2012
I. INTRODUCTION
∗
Electronic address: [email protected]
The calculation of the structural, electrical, and optical properties of PbTiO3 was
carried out by a self-consistent scheme by solving the Kohn-Sham equations. Using a FP-
LAPW method in the framework of the density functional theory (DFT) along with the
generalized gradient approximation (GGA), Engle-Vosco approximation (EVA), and local
spin density approximation with the aim of the Hubbard parameter U, (LSDA+U) [10–14]
using the Wien2k codes [15]. The calculation was performed with 300 k-points and Rkmax =
7 (R is the smallest muffin-tin radius and kmax is the cut-off wave vector of the plane-wave
basis set) for the convergence parameter for which the calculation stabilizes and convergence
in terms of the energy is achieved. The values of the other parameters are Gmax = 14 a−1 o
(Gmax is the magnitude of largest vector in the charge density Fourier expansion or the plane
wave cutoff and ao is the Bohr radius), RMT (Pb)= 1.6 au, RMT (Ti)= 1.6 au, RMT (O)= 1.7
au (muffin-tin radius), and U = 0.8 eV (Coulomb interaction parameter). The iteration
was halted when the difference charge density was less than 0.0001e a−3 o between steps as
a convergence criterion. The core cut off energy, which defines the separation of core and
valence states, was chosen as −8 Ry.
The imaginary part of the dielectric tensor can be computed from the knowledge of
the electronic band structure of a solid. In the limit of linear optics, in the non-spinpolarized
case, and within the frame of the random phase approximation, we can use the following
well-known relations [16]:
4πe2 X ∞
Z D E
Imεαβ (ω) = 2 2 dk hck |P α | vk i vk P β ck δ (εck − εvk − ω) , (1)
m ω c,y 0
∞
2 ω ′ Imεαβ (ω ′ ) ′
Z
Reεαβ (ω) = δαβ + dω . (2)
π 0 ̟′2 − ω 2
The optical conductivity is given by
ω
Reσαβ (ω) = Imεαβ (ω) , (3)
4π
where |ck i and |vk i are the electron states in the conduction and valance bands, respectively,
with the wave vector k, and P is the Kooshy integral section. Here, εαβ (ω) = Reεαβ +
iImεαβ = ε1 + iε2 is the complex dielectric tensor.
Knowing the complex dielectric tensor, one can calculate various optical constants
from the following relations, which describe the system response with respect to the prop-
agation of the electromagnetic wave through the material. The refractive index, n(ω), and
the extinction coefficient, k(ω), are given by
r
|ε (ω)| + Reε (ω)
n (ω) = , (4)
2
and
r
|ε (ω)| + Reε (ω)
k (ω) = . (5)
2
630 FIRST PRINCIPLE CALCULATION . . . VOL. 50
Here B0 is an equilibrium bulk modulus that efficiently measures the curvature of the
energy versus volume curve about the relaxed volume V0 , and B0′ is the derivative of the
bulk modulus.
The calculation were first carried out applying the experimental data for lattice con-
stants, then by minimizing the ratio of the total energy of the crystal to its volume (volume
optimization) the theoretical lattice constants were obtained.
Figure 1 shows the total energy with respect to volume of the unit cell after opti-
mization for the cubic state of PbTiO3 .
The band structures for PbTiO3 have been calculated with the FP-LAPW-GGA,
FP-LAPW-LDA, and FP-LAPW-EV and FPLAPW-LSDA+U methods, and we have been
reporting the FPLAPW-LSDA+U method results. The calculated band structures for
PbTiO3 along the high-symmetry lines of the Brillouin-zone (BZ) by the FP-LAPW-
LSDA+U method are better than other methods and are shown in Fig. 2.
VOL. 50 S. J. MOUSAVI AND A. POURHABIB-YEKTA 631
For PbTiO3 there is a band gap which separates the valence and conduction bands
with 3.3 eV at the point. The experimental value for the direct band gap of PbTiO3 is
3–3.5 eV. Our calculated value for the band gap is very close to the experimental value and
is very much better than the other theoretically calculated values that have been reported.
(For comparison please see Table I). Our calculations with the DFT are fundamentally
632 FIRST PRINCIPLE CALCULATION . . . VOL. 50
ground-state calculations and, therefore, tend to underestimate the band gap energy, since
this energy corresponds to a transition to a higher-energy exited state of the solid [18].
TABLE I: Unit cell volume, lattice constants ratio, and bulk modulus for PbTiO3 .
PbTiO3 V(a.u)3 a(Ao ) B(GPa)
FPLAPW-GGA 422.67 3.97 171
FPLAPW-LDA 403.79 3.91 182
FPLAPW-EV 435.58 4.01 158
FPLAPW-LSDA+U 413.02 3.94 177
Expt. [1] 416.32 3.95 —
The total density of state (DOS) that describes the electron distribution in an energy
spectrum is shown in Fig. 3. The electronic state is separated into three regions, the lower
valence band (LVB), upper valence band, and conduction band (CB). The LVB density of
the state peak is about −15 eV and has a 1.5 eV width that is separated by a large gap of
about 7 eV from the UVB states which have a width of about 8 eV.
eparated by a large gap of about 7 eV from UVB states which have a width of about 8 eV.
FIG. 3.FIG.
Total density
3: Total density ofof state
state of PbTiO
of PbTiO 3.
The total DOS of PbTiO3 for Pb, Ti, and oxygen atoms are shown in Fig. 4. The
electronic states below the fermi level are dominated by oxygen and Pb states. The lower
valence bands (LVB) are composed of the O-2s and Pb-5d orbitals, and the upper valence
bands (UVB) consist mostly of the O-2p and Pb-6s orbitals. The Ti-3d and Pb-6s states
contribute mainly to the conduction band (CB) DOS.
VOL. 50 S. J. MOUSAVI AND A. POURHABIB-YEKTA 633
b-6s orbital. Ti-3d and Pb-6s states contribute mainly to the conduction band (CB) DOS.
Fig. 4. Total
FIG. 4:density of ofstate
Total density state for Pb,
for Pb, Ti, Ti
and and
oxygenOxygen
atoms. atoms
The electronic charge density for the (100) and (110) planes, in two and three dimen-
sion, are shown in Figures 5 and 6. From the contours of the charge density it appears that
the bond between Pb and O is typically ionic whereas Ti and O have a covalent character.
(a) (b)
. 5. Charge density in two dimension for PbTiO3 in cubic phase related to (a) (110) and (b) (100) pl
FIG. 5: Charge density in two dimension for PbTiO3 in the cubic phase related to the (a) (110)
and (b) (100) plane.
634 FIRST PRINCIPLE CALCULATION . . . VOL. 50
Pb Pb
Pb Pb
Pb Ti Pb
O Pb
O
O Pb
(a) (b)
FIG. 6: Charge density in three dimension for PbTiO3 in the cubic phase related to the (a) (110)
and (b) (100) plane.
The dielectric tensor for the orthorhombic PbTiO3 is diagonal and has the following
form:
ț
Imεxx 0 0
Imε = ª 0 H Imεyy 0 º (9)
H «0 «
0 H Imεzz . »
»
H »¼1 (ω), and imaginary, ε2 (ω), parts of the dielectric
Fig. 7(a) «¬and 6(b) show the real, ε
functions calculated for PbTiO3 as a function of the incident photonp energy. √ The value of
the static refractive indexİ along
Ȧ the a-axis obtainedİ Ȧis na (0) = Reε(0) = 8.1 = 2.83
which is close to the experimental value 2.94.
Our calculated results for the imaginary part of epsilon shows two main peaks at
H
around 4 and 7 eV and other peaks are around 13.5 and 17 eV. These points are related
to interband transitions from the valance to conduction band states. The origin of the
different peaks in dielectric functions is from interband transitions. In terms of selection
rules, only transitions that imply a change ∆ι = ±1 in angular momentum are allowed.
The peak at 4 eV for ε2 (ω) is related to the transition from the Pb-6s to Pb-6p states.
From the real part of the dielectric function, Fig. 7(a), the static dielectric function ε1 (ω)
is deduced, and its value is 8.1.
The optical reflectivity of PbTiO3 in terms of energy was calculated and is shown in
Fig. 8. The main peak around 23 eV was calculated. As we know from the literature, an
exciton is a bound electron-hole pair, usually free to move together through the crystal.
These excitons are produced when a photon of energy greater than the energy gap 3.3
eV for PbTiO3 is absorbed in a crystal. These excitons may move through the crystal
transporting exciton energy but not charge. Because of its charge neutrality it does not
contribute directly to the electrical conductivity. If an insulator contains bound electron-
ǻȚ
«¬ H »¼
İ Ȧ İ Ȧ
H
VOL. 50 S. J. MOUSAVI AND A. POURHABIB-YEKTA 635
FIG. 7, (a)FIG.
real7: (b) imaginary and part of dielectric function of PbTiO
(a) real (b) imaginary and part of the dielectric function of PbTiO3 .
hole pairs it is called an excitonic insulator. However, in the case of PbTiO3 , from the
optical reflectivity we can see such excitonic features at 4.5, 10, 23, and 37 eV.
ǻȚ
İ Ȧ
İ
!Z
H
H
H H
scattered electrons (Zero Loss), electrons which excite the atoms’ electrons of the outer
!Z9 the energy loss function
shell (Valence Loss), or valence interband transitions. In Figure
is plotted for PbTiO3 . The energy of the main maximum is assigned to the energy of the
volume plasmon, h̄ωp , and is equal to 24 eV.
FIG. 9,FIG.
Electron energy
9: Electron lossspectrum
energy loss spectrum of 3PbTiO
of PbTiO . 3
V. CONCLUSION
We have calculated the structural, electronic, and optical properties of PbTiO3 using
the full potential linearized augmented plane wave (FP-LAPW) method with generalized
gradient approximation (GGA) in the framework of density functional theory. The crystal
structure has been optimized, the lattice constant, and its equilibrium atomic position were
calculated. The calculated electronic structure and charge density yield a band gap of 3.3
eV at the point in the Brillouin zone. The total density of state calculation shows that
below the Fermi level the Pb-5d and O-2s state are dominate. The calculations show a
static dielectric function along the a-axis 8.1, an electron energy loss spectrum of 24 eV,
and a refractive index of 2.83 along the a-axis.
ɏ
References
[1] R. Nelmes and W. F. Kuchs, Solid State Commun. 54 (8), 721 (1985).
[2] D. de Lazaro, E. Longo, J. R. Sambrano, and A. Beltrán, Surface Science 552, 149 (2004).
[3] S. Piskunov, E. Heifets, R. I. Eglitis, and G. Bostel, Compt. Mater. Sci. 29, 165 (2004).
[4] R. E. Cohen and H. Krakauer, Ferroelectric 136, 65 (1992).
[5] G. Saghi-Szabo and R. E. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, No. 19, 4321 (1998).
VOL. 50 S. J. MOUSAVI AND A. POURHABIB-YEKTA 637
[6] G. Saghi-Szabo and R. E. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 59, No. 20, 4321 (1999).
[7] K. M. Rabe, and P. Ghozes, Journal of Electroceramics 4, No. 2–3, 379 (2000).
[8] B. Meyer, J. Padilla, and David Vanderbilt, Faraday Discuss. 114, 395 (1999).
[9] E. R. Leite et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2148 (2001).
[10] K. Schwarz, J. Solid State Chem. 176, 319 (2003).
[11] K. Schwarz, P. Blaha, Comput. Mater. Sci. 28, 259 (2003).
[12] K. Schwarz, P. Blaha, G. K. H. Madsen, Comput. Phys. Commun. 147, 71 (2002).
[13] M. Peterson et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 126, 294 (2000).
[14] V. I. Anisimov, A. I. Poteryaev, M. A. Korotin, and A. O. Anokhin, Condensed Matter 9, 767
(1997).
[15] P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, and J. Luitz, Inst. f. Materials Chemistry,
TU Vienna, http://www.wien2k.at/
[16] F. Wooten, Optical properties of solids (Academic Press, New York, 1972).
[17] F. D. Murnaghan, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Vol. 30, 244 (1944).
[18] J. P. Perdew and M. Levy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1884 (1983).