Pid PDF
Pid PDF
Iph = ( G/Gref) [Isc + Ki (T-25)] ( 1) charging mode, second mode when the switch is opened
( ) known as discharging mode.
Ir = IrT1 ( (2)
2. MPPT Algorithms
Ir-T1 = ISCT1/ (3)
The MPPT ( maximum Power point ) is a greater
Ipv =Iph – Ir[exp{q (Vpv+IpvRa )/AkT}]-1]–(Vpv+IRa)/Rsh (4) frequency DC/DC converters .They take the DC input from
solar panels change to higher frequency AC & convert it
The diode voltage is Vg equal to 1.2 V for crystalline silicon back down to different DC current & voltage to exactly
1.7 V for amorphous silicon. Where b= Vg*q/ (A*k) matched to system of the batteries. MPPT' operating at
PV system is gives the output Voltage & Current that will higher audio frequencies usually in 30- 80 KHz range. The
be vary with the change in solar temperature and sun advantage of greater frequency circuits that we can be
Irradiation. Hence to get constant voltage at the load duty designed with higher efficiency & small components .
cycle of the DC-DC converter should change with change The conventional controller is charging discharge battery,
in PV system voltage. In order to get constant voltage at it simply connected the modules directly to the battery.
the load MPPT Controller are design that can control the This forces the modules system to operate at battery
duty cycle of DC-DC converter.1.2. voltage, typically is not the ideal.The main principle of
incremental conductance method is that the derivative of
the output power (P), in terms of voltage (V), at the peak
1.2. Boost (DC/DC) Converter
power points equal to zero (dP/dV = 0). Therefore, from
The boost converter is also known as the step-up the equation P=I.V, the following equation is obtain;
converter. It can be used in the cases where the output
voltage more than the input voltage, essentially the 2.1
functioning like are versed buck converter. The practical
applications which use a boost type converter appear in Therefore, within a sampling period, Equation can be
grid systems. rewritten as:
1.2 2.2
Where Toff is the duration that the switch is not active, D is Equation (2.2) means that, at the MPP, the opposite of the
a duty ratio, T is the time period. instantaneous conductance of PV array system on the left
side of the equation equals to the incremental conductance
on the right hand side. Thus, the derivative of the points
should be greater than zero on the left of the MPP while,
less than zero on the right side:
( ) 2.3
( ) 2.4
( ) 2.5
3. PID controller
A PID (proportional-integral-derivative) controller is a
control loop feedback mechanism. Feedback mechanism
mainly used in industrial control systems. The PID
controller attempts to correct the error between a desired
setpoint & a measured process variable by calculating &
then output of a corrective action that can adjust the
Figure.3. Boost converter process according. As the PID controller involves
calculation three different (separate) parameters,
There are two different modes of operation works a boost Proportional(P), Derivative(D) and the Integral (I) values.
converter. The converter are based on close and open the The Proportional (P) value is determing the reaction to
switch.The first mode when the switch is closed known as current error, the Derivative (D) value is determing
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2274
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN:2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 05 | May-2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
reaction based on the rate at which the error has been Table.2: PV cells Specification
changed and the Integral (I) value determines the
reaction based on the sum of the recent errors. The add Electric parameter PV Cell
this three actions are used to adjusting the process via a
control elements. We are using PID controller for improve Maximum power Pmax 66.45 W
the performance of the voltage and peak power. PID
Maximum voltage(open circuit) 110.4 V
controller gain change the value of the output will change
But after a fixed gain the value cannot be change. Maximum current (short circuit 1.66 A
output)
u(t) = Kp e(t)+ Ki ∫ e(t) dt +Kd Temp. coeff.short circuit current (.065+.015)%C
Figure.5. PID controller
PID Controller P I D
Figure.6. the solar modeled of PV system with inverter Form the figure.9 we can see that peak voltage(V) is going
up to 110.4 V, when we do not apply any controller. The
voltage can be improve by apply the PID controller.
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2275
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN:2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 05 | May-2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Figure.9. Voltage graph without any controller Figure.12. Voltage graph with PID controller
Form the figure.10 we can see that peak power (P) is Form the figure.13 we can see that peak power(P) is going
going up to 66.45 W, when we do not apply any controller. up to 79.24 W when we apply the PID controller. Power
The power can be improved by apply the PID controller. can be further improve by apply to fuzzy logic controller.
Figure.10. Power graph without any controller Figure.13. Power graph with PID controller
Result for PV system with PID controller Table.3: Proposed design Output values for PV
Form the figure.11 we can see that peak current(I) is going Parameter Calculate value Calculate value
up to 1.98A when we apply the PID controller. The voltage (existing design) ( proposed design)
can be further improve by apply to fuzzy logic controller.
Peak
current 1.661 A 1.981 A
Peak
voltage 110.4 V 157 V
Peak
power 66.45 W 79.24 W
4. Conclusion
Figure.11. current graph with PID controller
The PV cell-generate DC current from the sunlight. the
Form the figure.12we can see that peak voltage(V) is going solar array is generated by connecting individual solar
up to 157 V when we apply the PID controller. The voltage cells system together. The output current is a solar array
can be further improve by apply to fuzzy logic controller. depends on the ambient temperature, solar insolation, the
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2276
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN:2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 05 | May-2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
size and configuration of the PV array. In general, the [12] Ji Y-H, Jung D-Y, Kim J-G, Kim J-H, Lee T-W, Won C-Y. A
larger area PV panels will produce more energy, and real maximum power point tracking method for
smaller PV panels produce less energy. From the mismatching compensation in PV array under partially
simulation result, the PID controller has shown the better shaded conditions. IEEE Trans Power Electron 2011;26:
performance than other MPPT techniques. 1001-9.
In the paper, we apply PID controller is improving the [13]LK Dwivedi, V. singh, A. Pareek, P. Yadav “MATLAB/
performance of the output power. When we do not apply
SIMULINK based study of series- parallel connected
PID controller the output power is getting 66.45 W. It gets
photovoltaic system under partial shaded condition ’’
improved when we apply the PID controller and getting
IRJET vol. 3, iss. 10, 2016
the output power is 79.24 W. For further improve the
performance of PV system we can apply Neural network [14] R.Ramaprabha and B.L. Mathur, "Characteristics of
which can further improved the performance of output solar PV array under partial shaded conditions," in
power. After apply neural network controller the results of TENCON 2008 - 2008 IEEE Region 10 Conference, 2008,
the current, voltages and power get improved.
BIOGRAPHIES
REFERENCES
[1] Zhu Y, Shi X, Dan Y, Li P, Liu W, Wei D, et Application of Laxmi Kant Dwivedi was born in
PSO algorithm in global MPPT for PV array.CSEE 2012 Unnao (UP), India, in 1985. He
;32:42-8.64 received his B.Tech degree in
[2] Mellit A, Rezzouk H, Messai A, Medjahed B. FPGA-based Electronics & instrumentation in
real time implementation of MPPT-controller for 2010 from IET - Lucknow and
photovoltaic systems.2011;36: 1652-61. M.Tech in control system ( EE) in
2016 from IIT-BHU, India.
[3] M. Miyatake, M. Veerachary, F. Toriumi, N. Fujii and H.
Ko, "Maximum Power Point Tracking of Multiple
Photovoltaic Arrays: A PSO Approach," Aerospace and
Electronic Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 47, pp. 367,
january, 2011.
[4] N. Fermia, D. Granozio, G. Petrone and M. Vitelli,
"Predictive Adaptive MPPT Perturb and Observe Method,"
Aerospace and Electronic Systems, IEEE Transactions on,
vol. 43, pp. 934, july, 2007.
[5] LK Dwivedi, P.Yadav, Dr. R.K. Saket “MATLAB based
modelling and maximum power point tracking (MPPT)
method for photovoltaic system under partial shading
conditions ’’ IRJET vol. 3, iss. 7, 2016
[6] D.F. Dunster, Semiconductors for Engineers. Business
Books, .
[7] World Energy Council ., "Renewable energy resources:
A guide to the future," Kogan Page,
[8] N. Femia, G. Petrone, G. Spagnuolo and M. Vitelli,
"Optimization of perturb and observe maximum power
point tracking method," Power Electronics, IEEE
Transactions on, vol. 20, pp. 963, july, 2005.
[9] Jun Qi, Youbing Zhang*, Yi Chen College of Information
Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou
310023, China, Renewable Energy 66 (2014) 337-345
[10] Kakosimos PE, Kladas AG. Implementation of
photovoltaic array MPPT through fixed step predictive
control technique. Renew Energy 2011;36:2508-14.
[11] Patel H, Agarwal V. Maximum power point tracking
scheme for PV systems operating under partially shaded
conditions. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2008;55:1689-98.
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2277