Meaning (linguistics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search

In linguistics, meaning is the information or concepts that a sender intends to convey, or does
convey, in communication with a receiver.[1][2]

Contents

 1The sources of ambiguity

o 1.1Pragmatics
o 1.2Semantic meaning
o 1.3Conceptual meaning
 2Semiotics
 3See also
 4References
 5Further reading
 6External links

The sources of ambiguity[edit]

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please
help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find
sources: "Meaning" linguistics – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March
2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Ambiguity means confusion about what is conveyed, since the current context may lead to different
interpretations of meaning. Many words in many languages have multiple definitions. Ambiguity is an
effect of a rupture of the rule of identity in the context of the exchange of information. Particularly
the sender may be physically absent, and the contexts explicitly divergent, such as will be the case
when the receptor is a reader and the sender was a writer.
Pragmatics[edit]
Main article: Pragmatics
Pragmatics is the study of how context affects meaning. The two primary forms of context important
to pragmatics are linguistic context and situation context.
Linguistic context is how meaning is understood without relying on intent and assumptions. In
applied pragmatics, for example, meaning is formed through sensory experiences, even though
sensory stimulus cannot be easily articulated in language or signs. Pragmatics, then, reveals that
meaning is both something affected by and affecting the world. Meaning is something contextual
with respect to language and the world, and is also something active toward other meanings and the
world. Linguistic context becomes important when looking at particular linguistic problems such as
that of pronouns.
Situation context refers to every non-linguistic factor that affects the meaning of a phrase. An
example of situation context can be seen in the phrase "it's cold in here", which can either be a
simple statement of fact or a request to turn up the heat, depending on, among other things, whether
or not it is believed to be in the listener's power to affect the temperature.
Semantic meaning[edit]
Main article: Semantics
The relationship between words and their referents is called semantic.[3] Semantics is the study of
how meaning is conveyed through signs and language. Understanding how facial expressions, body
language, and tone affect meaning, and how words, phrases, sentences, and punctuation relate to
meaning are examples. Various subgroups of semantics are studied within the fields of linguistics,
logic and computing. For example, linguistic semantics includes the history of how words have been
used in the past; logical semantics includes how people mean and refer in terms of likely intent and
assumptions.
During the 19th century, John Stuart Mill defined semantic meaning with the words "denotation" and
"connotation".[4] A denotation is the literal or primary meaning of a word. Connotations are ideas or
feelings that a word invokes for a person in addition to its literal or primary meaning.
The original use of "meaning" as understood early in the 20th century occurred through Lady Welby,
after her daughter translated the term "semantics" from French.
Conceptual meaning[edit]
Main article: Concept
Languages allow information to be conveyed even when the specific words used are not known by
the reader or listener. People connect words with meaning and use words to refer to concepts. A
person's intentions affect what is meant. Meaning (in English) as intent harkens back to the Anglo-
Saxons and is associated today still, with the German verb meinen as to think or intend.

Semiotics[edit]
Main article: Semiotics
Ferdinand de Saussure, in founding semiology, his original subset of the semiotics, started
describing language in terms of Signs, dividing those signs in turn into signifieds and signifiers. The
signifier is the perceptive side of a sign, thus the sound form in case of oral language. The signified
is the signification (semantic) side, the mental construction or image associated with the sound, by
either a speaker and hearer. A sign, then, is essentially a relationship between signified and signifier.
Signs are essentially conventional, as any foreign language student is well aware: there is no reason
that bat couldn't mean "body of water" or even "that bust of Napoleon over there". Since the choice
of signifiers is ultimately arbitrary, the meaning cannot somehow be in the signifier. Saussure instead
defers meaning to the sign itself: meaning is ultimately the same thing as the sign,
and meaning means that relationship is between signified and signifier. All meaning is both within us
and communal, thus cultural. Signs "mean" by reference to our internal lexicon and grammar, and
despite there being a matter of convention, so the communal part, signs also, because of the
individual's uniqueness, can mean something only to the individual (what red means to one person
may not be what red means to another, either in absolute value, or by including what's suggested by
the context). However, while meanings carried by one given set of signifiers may vary to some
extent from individual to individual, only those meanings that stay within a boundary are seen by
other speakers of the language to belong to the language: if one were to refer to smells as red, most
other speakers would assume the person is talking nonsense (although statements like this are
common among people who experience synesthesia, or in poetry).
See also[edit]
Fields

 General semantics
 Semiotics
 Pragmatics
Perspectives

 Logical positivism
 Ordinary language philosophy
 Sense and reference
Theories

 Causal theory of names

 Definite descriptions
 Theory of descriptions
 Universal grammar
Considerations

 Ideasthesia
 Idea
 Image
 Information
 Meaning (non-linguistic)
 Metaphor
 Sense
 Symbol
 Symbol grounding
 Sphoṭa
Important theorists

 J. L. Austin
 Roland Barthes
 Rudolf Carnap
 Noam Chomsky
 Eugenio Coseriu
 Umberto Eco
 Viktor Frankl
 Gottlob Frege
 Edmund Husserl
 Paul Grice
 Roman Jakobson
 Saul Kripke
 Claude Lévi-Strauss
 Charles Sanders Peirce
 Bertrand Russell
 Ferdinand de Saussure
 John Searle
 P. F. Strawson
 Willard Van Orman Quine
 Ludwig Wittgenstein

References[edit]
1. ^ "meaning". Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
2. ^ Nick Sanchez. "Communication Process". New Jersey Institute of Technology. Retrieved January
14, 2012.
3. ^ https://tr.scribd.com/document/137895627/%D0%92-%D0%9D-
%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2-
%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0
4. ^ Fred Wilson (Jan 3, 2002). "John Stuart Mill". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford.
Retrieved October 8, 2010.

Further reading[edit]
 Akmajian, Adrian, Richard Demers, Ann Farmer, and Robert Harnish. Linguistics: an introduction
to language and communication, 4th edition. 1995. Cambridge: MIT Press.
 Allan, Keith. Linguistic Meaning, Volume One. 1986. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
 Austin, J. L. How to Do Things With Words. 1962. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
 Bacon, Sir Francis, Novum Organum, 1620.
 Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality : A Treatise in the
Sociology of Knowledge. 1967. First Anchor Books Edition. 240 pages.
 Blackmore, John T., "Section 2, Communication", Foundation theory, 2000. Sentinel Open
Press.
 Blackmore, John T., "Prolegomena", Ernst Mach's Philosophy - Pro and Con, 2009. Sentinel
Open Press.
 Blackmore, John T. Semantic Dialogues or Ethics versus Rhetoric, 2010, Sentinel Open Press
 Chase, Stuart, The Tyranny of Words, New York, 1938. Harcourt, Brace and Company
 Davidson, Donald. Inquiries into Truth and Meaning, 2nd edition. 2001. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
 Dummett, Michael. Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd Edition. 1981. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
 Frege, Gottlob. The Frege Reader. Edited by Michael Beaney. 1997. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishing
 Gauker, Christopher. Words without Meaning. 2003. MIT Press
 Goffman, Erving. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. 1959. Anchor Books.
 Grice, Paul. Studies in the Way of Words. 1989. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
 Hayakawa, S.I. The Use and Misuse of Language, 11th edition, 1962 [1942]. Harper and
Brothers.
 James, William. William James on Habit, Will, Truth, and the Meaning of Life. Edited by James
Sloan Allen. 2014. Savannah: Frederic C. Beil, Publisher.
 Ogden, C.K. and I.A. Richards, The Meaning of Meaning, New York, 1923. Harcourt Brace &
World.
 Schiller, F.C.S., Logic for Use, London, 1929. G. Bell.
 Searle, John and Daniel Vanderveken. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. 1985. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
 Searle, John. Speech Acts. 1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Searle, John. Expression and Meaning. 1979. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Stonier, Tom: Information and Meaning. An Evolutionary Perspective. 1997. XIII, 255 p. 23,5 cm.

External links[edit]
 "Conceptual role semantics" by Ned Block
 A summary of Wittgenstein's view of meaning
 Broken Link. Unclaimed page. Meaning at CCMS
 Meaning from a translator's point of view
 Broken Link. Site is now business blog. Meaning.ch - research group
 Broken Link. Unclaimed page. Semiotics and Saussure at CCMS
 USECS as the general catalog of meanings