Rules, 2018 To Amend The Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014
Rules, 2018 To Amend The Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014
Rules, 2018 To Amend The Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014
(b) in clause (b) for the words "who is a cost accountant in practice", the words "who
is a cost accountant" shall be substituted.
2. Enforcement of the Companies (Accounts) Amendment Rules, 2018 vide
Notification G.S.R. 725(E) dated 31 st July, 2018
The Central Government makes the Companies (Accounts) Amendment Rules, 2018 to
amend the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.
In the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014,
(i) In sub-rule (5) of Rule 8 which deals with the Matters to be included in Board's
report, after clause (viii) the following clauses shall be inserted, namely:-
“(ix) a disclosure, as to whether maintenance of cost records as specified by the
Central Government under sub-section (1) of section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013,
is required by the Company and accordingly such accounts and records are made
and maintained,
(x) a statement that the company has complied with provisions relating to the
constitution of Internal Complaints Committee under the Sexual Harassment of
Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013,”
(ii) after sub-rule (5), the following Sub Rule (6), rule shall be inserted, namely:-
“(6) This rule shall not apply to One Person Company or Small Company”.
(iii) after rule 8, the following rule 8A shall be inserted, namely:-
“8A. Matters to be included in Board’s Report for One Person Company and Small
Company-
(1) The Board’s Report of One Person Company and Small Company shall be
prepared based on the stand alone financial statement of the company, which
shall be in abridged form and contain the following:-
(a) the web address, if any, where annual return referred to in sub-section (3)
of section 92 has been placed;
(b) number of meetings of the Board;
(c) Directors’ Responsibility Statement as referred to in sub-section (5) of
section 134;
(d) details in respect of frauds reported by auditors under sub-section (12) of
section 143 other than those which are reportable to the Central
Government;
(e) explanations or comments by the Board on every qualification, reservation
or adverse remark or disclaimer made by the auditor in his report;
(f) the state of the company’s affairs;
(iv) in rule 7 i.e., “CSR Expenditure”, for the words, “purview of”, the words “areas or
subjects, specified in” shall be substituted.
4. Constitution of NFRA
The Central Government vide Notification No. S.O. 5099(E) appoints the 1 st October, 2018
as the date of constitution of National Financial Reporting Authority.
5. Enforcement of sub-sections (2), (4), (5), (10), (13), (14) and (15) of section 132 i.e.,
related “Constitution of National Financial Reporting Authority” of the Companies
Act, 2013
The Central Government vide Notification S.O. 5385(E) appoints the 24th October, 2018
as the date on which the sub-sections (2), (4), (5), (10), (13), (14) and (15) of section 132
of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force.
6. Amendments through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017
Relevant sections Amendment
Amendment of In section 129 of the principal Act, for sub-section (3), the
section 129 following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:—
(Financial statement) "(3) Where a company has one or more subsidiaries or
associate companies, it shall, in addition to financial
statements provided under sub-section (2), prepare a
consolidated financial statement of the company and of
all the subsidiaries and associate companies in the
same form and manner as that of its own and in
accordance with applicable accounting standards,
which shall also be laid before the annual general
meeting of the company along with the laying of its
financial statement under sub-section (2):
Provided that the company shall also attach along with its
financial statement, a separate statement containing the
salient features of the financial statement of its subsidiary or
subsidiaries and associate company or companies in such
form as may be prescribed:
Provided further that the Central Government may provide
for the consolidation of accounts of companies in such
manner as may be prescribed."
Amendment of In section 134 of the principal Act,—
section 134 (a) for sub-section (1), the following sub-section shall be
(Financial substituted, namely:—
statement, Board's "(1) The financial statement, including consolidated
report, etc) financial statement, if any, shall be approved by
the Board of Directors before they are signed on
(ii) in sub-section (2), the words and figures “within the time
specified, under section 403” shall be omitted;
(iii) in sub-section (3), for the words and figures “in section
403”, the word “therein” shall be substituted.
Amendment of In section 139 of the principal Act, in sub-section (1), the
section 139 first proviso shall be omitted.
(Appointment of
auditors).
7. Amendments through the Companies (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2019 w.e.f.
2nd November, 2018
Relevant Amendment
sections
Amendment of In section 137 of the principal Act, in sub-section (3),—
section 137. (a) for the words “punishable with fine”, the words “liable to a
penalty” shall be substituted;
(b) for the portion beginning with “punishable with
imprisonment”, and ending with “five lakh rupees or with both”,
the words “shall be liable to a penalty of one lakh rupees and in
case of continuing failure, with a further penalty of one hundred
rupees for each day after the first during which such failure
continues, subject to a maximum of five lakh rupees” shall be
substituted.
Amendment of In section 140 of the principal Act, for sub-section (3), the
section 140. following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:—
“(3) If the auditor does not comply with the provisions of sub-
section (2), he or it shall be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand
rupees or an amount equal to the remuneration of the auditor,
whichever is less, and in case of continuing failure, with a further
penalty of five hundred rupees for each day after the first during
which such failure continues, subject to a maximum of five lakh
rupees.”.
CHAPTER 3: APPOINTMENT AND QUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS
1. Enforcement of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Second
Amendment Rules, 2018 vide Notification G.S.R. 431(E) dated 7th May 2018
The Central Government makes the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of
Directors) Second Amendment Rules, 2018 to amend the Companies (Appointment and
Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.
In the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014,
(a) rule 5 which deals with the Qualifications of Independent director, shall be numbered
as sub-rule (1) thereof, and after sub-rule (1) as so numbered, the following sub-rule
shall be inserted, namely:-
“(2) None of the relatives of an independent director, for the purposes of sub-clauses
(ii) and (iii) of clause (d) of sub-section (6) of section 149,-
(i) is indebted to the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company or their
promoters, or directors; or
(ii) has given a guarantee or provided any security in connection with the
indebtedness of any third person to the company, its holding, subsidiary or
associate company or their promoters, or directors of such holding company,
for an amount of fifty lakhs rupees, at any time during the two immediately
preceding financial years or during the current financial year.”
(b) In the principal rules, in rule 16 which deals with the copy of resignation of director
to be forwarded by him, for the word “shall”, the word “may” shall be substituted.
2. Enforcement of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Third
Amendment Rules, 2018 vide Notification G.S.R. 558 (E) dated 12th June 2018
The Central Government makes the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of
Directors) Third Amendment Rules, 2018 to amend the Companies (Appointment and
Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.
In the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, in the
annexure, for form DIR-3 which deals with the Application for allotment of Director
Identification Number, a new form shall be substituted.
3. Enforcement of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) fourth
Amendment Rules, 2018 vide Notification G.S.R. 615(E) w.e.f. 10 th July, 2018
The Central Government makes the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of
Directors) Fourth Amendment Rules, 2018 to amend the Companies (Appointment and
Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.
In Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014,
(i) The rule 11 (related to cancellation or surrender or deactivation of DIN) shall be
renumbered as sub-rule (1) thereof and after sub-rule (1) as so renumbered, the
following sub-rules shall be inserted, namely:-
"(2) The Central Government or Regional Director (Northern Region), or any officer
authorised by the Central Government or Regional Director (Northern Region) shall,
deactivate the Director Identification Number (DIN), of an individual who does not
intimate his particulars in e-form DIR-3-KYC within stipulated time in accordance
with Rule 12A.
(3) The de-activated DIN shall be re-activated only after e-form DIR-3-KYC is filed
along with fee as prescribed under Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules,
2014.
(ii) after rule 12, the following rule 12A shall be inserted, namely:-
“12A Directors KYC:- Every individual who has been allotted a Director Identification
Number (DIN) as on 31st March of a financial year as per these rules shall, submit e-
form DIR-3-KYC to the Central Government on or before 30 th April of immediate next
financial year.
Provided that every individual who has already been allotted a Director Identification
Number (DIN) as at 31st March, 2018, shall submit e-form DIR-3 KYC on or before
31st August, 2018.”;
(iii) In the Annexure after Form DIR-3 the Form DIR-3-KYC shall be inserted.
4. Enforcement of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Fifth
Amendment Rules, 2018 vide Notification G.S.R. 798 (E) dated 21st August 2018
The Central Government makes the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of
Directors) Fifth Amendment Rules, 2018 to amend the Companies (Appointment and
Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.
In the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014,
(i) in the proviso to rule 12A i.e., Directors KYC, for the words and numbers “DIR-3 KYC
on or before 31st August, 2018, the words and numbers “DIR-3 KYC on or before
15th September, 2018” shall be substituted.
(ii) in the Annexure, for Form No.DIR-3 KYC, a new Form shall be substituted.
5. Enforcement of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Sixth
Amendment Rules, 2018 vide Notification G.S.R. 904(E) dated 20th September 2018
The Central Government makes the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of
Directors) Sixth Amendment Rules, 2018 to amend the Companies (Appointment and
Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.
In the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, in the proviso
to rule 12A, for the words and figures “before 15th September, 2018,” the words and
figures “before 5th October, 2018 ” shall be substituted.
6. Amendments through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017
Relevant Amendment
sections
Amendment of In section 149 of the principal Act,—
section 149 (i) for sub-section (3), the following sub-section shall be
(Company to substituted, namely:—
have board of "(3) Every company shall have at least one director who stays
directors) in India for a total period of not less than one hundred and
eighty-two days during the financial year:
Provided that in case of a newly incorporated company the
requirement under this sub-section shall apply
proportionately at the end of the financial year in which it is
incorporated.";
(ii) in sub-section (6),—
(a) in clause (c), for the words "pecuniary relationship", the
words "pecuniary relationship, other than remuneration
as such director or having transaction not exceeding ten
per cent. of his total income or such amount as may be
prescribed," shall be substituted;
(b) for clause (d), the following clause shall be substituted,
namely:—
"(d) none of whose relatives—
(i) is holding any security of or interest in the
company, its holding, subsidiary or associate
company during the two immediately preceding
financial years or during the current financial year:
Provided that the relative may hold security or
interest in the company of face value not exceeding
fifty lakh rupees or two per cent. of the paid-up
capital of the company, its holding, subsidiary or
associate company or such higher sum as may be
prescribed;
(ii) is indebted to the company, its holding, subsidiary
or associate company or their promoters, or
directors, in excess of such amount as may be
prescribed during the two immediately preceding
financial years or during the current financial year;
(iii) has given a guarantee or provided any security in
connection with the indebtedness of any third
person to the company, its holding, subsidiary or
associate company or their promoters, or directors
of such holding company, for such amount as may
be prescribed during the two immediately
preceding financial years or during the current
financial year; or
(iv) has any other pecuniary transaction or relationship
(Appointment of MD, (a) in sub-section (3), in clause (a), after the proviso, the
WTD, Manager) following proviso shall be inserted, namely:—
“Provided further that where no such special resolution is
passed but votes cast in favour of the motion exceed the
votes, if any, cast against the motion and the Central
Government is satisfied, on an application made by the
Board, that such appointment is most beneficial to the
company, the appointment of the person who has
attained the age of seventy years may be made.”;
(b) in sub-section (4), for the words “specified in that
Schedule”, the words “specified in Part I of that Schedule”
shall be substituted.
Amendment of In section 197 of the principal Act,—
Section 197 (Overall (a) in sub-section (1),—
maximum (i) in the first proviso, the words "with the approval of
managerial the Central Government," shall be omitted;
remuneration and
(ii) in the second proviso, after the words "general
managerial
meeting,", the words "by a special resolution," shall
remuneration in case
be inserted;
of absence or
inadequacy of (iii) after the second proviso, the following proviso shall
profits) be inserted, namely:—
"Provided also that, where the company has defaulted in
payment of dues to any bank or public financial
institution or non-convertible debenture holders or
any other secured creditor, the prior approval of the
bank or public financial institution concerned or the
non-convertible debenture holders or other secured
creditor, as the case may be, shall be obtained by
the company before obtaining the approval in the
general meeting.";
(b) in sub-section (3), the words "and if it is not able to
comply with such provisions, with the previous approval
of the Central Government" shall be omitted;
(c) for sub-section (9), the following sub-section shall be
substituted, namely:—
"(9) If any director draws or receives, directly or indirectly,
by way of remuneration any such sums in excess of the
limit prescribed by this section or without approval
required under this section, he shall refund such sums to
the company, within two years or such lesser period as
penalty of five lakh rupees and every director and key managerial
personnel of the company who is in default shall be liable to a
penalty of fifty thousand rupees and where the default is a
continuing one, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for
each day after the first during which such default continues but
not exceeding five lakh rupees.”.
CHAPTER 5: MEETING OF BOARD AND ITS POWERS
1. Enforcement of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Amendment
Rules, 2018 vide Notification G.S.R. 429 (E) dated 7th May, 2018
The Central Government makes the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers)
Amendment Rules, 2018 to amend the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers)
Rules, 2014.
In Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014,
(i) in rule 4 i.e., related the matters not to be dealt with in a meeting trough video
conferencing or other audio visual means, the following proviso shall be inserted,
namely:-
“Provided that where there is quorum in a meeting through physical presence of
directors, any other director may participate through video conferencing or other
audio visual means.”
(ii) In the principal rules, in rule 6 related to the Committees to the Board, for the words
“every listed company”, the words “every listed public company” shall be substituted.
(iii) In the principal rules, for rule 13 i.e. related to the Special Resolution, the following
rule shall be substituted, namely:-
“13. Special Resolution- A resolution passed at a general meeting in terms of sub-
section (3) of section 186 to give any loan or guarantee or investment or providing
any security or the acquisition under sub-section (2) of section 186 shall specify the
total amount up to which the Board of Directors are authorised to give such loan or
guarantee, to provide such security or make such acquisition:
Provided that the company shall disclose to the members in the financial statement
the full particulars in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (4) of section 186.”
2. Amendments through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017
Relevant sections Amendment
Amendment of section In section 173 of the principal Act, in sub-section (2),
173 (Meetings of Board) after the first proviso, the following proviso shall be
inserted, namely:—
"Provided further that where there is quorum in a meeting
through physical presence of directors, any other director
Provided that the loans made under clauses (c) and (d)
are utilized by the subsidiary company for its principal
business activities.
(4) If any loan is advanced or a guarantee or security is
given or provided or utilised in contravention of the
provisions of this section,—
(i) the company shall be punishable with fine which
shall not be less than five lakh rupees but which may
extend to twenty-five lakh rupees;
(ii) every officer of the company who is in default shall
be punishable with imprisonment for a term which
may extend to six months or with fine which shall
not be less than five lakh rupees but which may
extend to twenty-five lakh rupees; and
(iii) the director or the other person to whom any loan is
advanced or guarantee or security is given or
provided in connection with any loan taken by him
or the other person, shall be punishable with
imprisonment which may extend to six months or
with fine which shall not be less than five lakh
rupees but which may extend to twenty-five lakh
rupees, or with both.’
Amendment of section In section 186 of the principal Act,—
186 (Loan and investment (i) in sub-section (2), the following Explanation shall
by company). be inserted, namely:—
'Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section,
the word "person" does not include any individual
who is in the employment of the company.';
(ii) for sub-section (3), the following sub-section shall
be substituted, namely:—
'(3) Where the aggregate of the loans and
investment so far made, the amount for which
guarantee or security so far provided to or in
all other bodies corporate along with the
investment, loan, guarantee or security
proposed to be made or given by the Board,
exceed the limits specified under sub-section
(2), no investment or loan shall be made or
guarantee shall be given or security shall be
provided unless previously authorised by a
special resolution passed in a general
meeting:
(a) in clause (c), for the word and figures “section 455,”, the
words and figures “section 455; or” shall be substituted;
(b) after clause (c) and before the long line, the following clauses
shall be inserted, namely:—
“(d) the subscribers to the memorandum have not paid the
subscription which they had undertaken to pay at the time of
incorporation of a company and a declaration to this effect has
not been filed within one hundred and eighty days of its
incorporation under sub-section (1) of section 10A; or
(e) the company is not carrying on any business or operations,
as revealed after the physical verification carried out under sub-
section (9) of section 12.”.
CHAPTER 16: SPECIAL COURTS
Amendments through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017
Relevant sections Amendment
Amendment of For section 435 of the principal Act, the following shall be
section 435. substituted, namely:—
(Establishment of 435. (1) The Central Government may, for the purpose of
Special Courts) providing speedy trial of offences under this Act, by notification,
establish or designate as many Special Courts as may be
necessary.
(2) A Special Court shall consist of—
(a) a single judge holding office as Session Judge or
Additional Session Judge, in case of offences
punishable under this Act with imprisonment of two
years or more; and
(b) a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of
the First Class, in the case of other offences,
who shall be appointed by the Central Government
with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High
Court within whose jurisdiction the judge to be
appointed is working.".
Amendment of In section 438 of the principal Act, for the words "deemed to be
section 438 a Court of Session", the words "deemed to be a Court of Session
(Application of Code or the court of Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate
to proceedings before of the First Class, as the case may be," shall be substituted.
Special court)
Amendment of In section 439 of the principal Act, in sub-section (2), after the
section 439 (Offences words "a shareholder", the words "or a member" shall be
to be non cogizable). inserted.
Amendment of In section 440 of the principal Act, for the words "Court of
section 440 Session", at both the places, the words "Court of Session or the
(Transitional Court of Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the
provisions). First Class, as the case may be" shall be substituted.
Amendments through the Companies (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2019 w.e.f. 2 nd
November, 2018
Relevant Amendment
sections
Amendment of In section 446B of the principal Act, for the portion beginning with
section 446B. “punishable with fine” and ending with “specified in such sections”,
the words “liable to a penalty which shall not be more than one half
of the penalty specified in such sections” shall be substituted.
(ii) In the said rules, in rule 14 i.e., related to Conditions of Recognition, in clause (f),
for the words “one year”, the words “two years” shall be substituted.
3. Enforcement of the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Fourth
Amendment Rules, 2018 vide Notification G.S.R.1108(E) dated 13th November 2018
The Central Government makes the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Fourth
Amendment Rules, 2018 to amend the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation)
Rules, 2017.
In the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to
as “the said rules”)
(i) in rule 1, -
(a) for the marginal heading, the following marginal heading shall be substituted,
namely:-
“Short title, commencement and application”;
(b) after sub-rule (2), the following sub-rule shall be inserted, namely:-
“(3) These rules shall apply for valuation in respect of any property, stocks,
shares, debentures, securities or goodwill or any other assets or net worth of a
company or its liabilities under the provision of the Act or these rules.
Explanation.- It is hereby clarified that conduct of valuation under any other law other
than the Act or these rules by any person shall not be affected by virtue of coming
into effect of these rules.”.
(ii) In the said rules, in rule 3, in sub-rule (2), -
(a) in clause (a), the word “not” shall be omitted;
(b) in clause (c), after the brackets and letter “(e)”, the brackets and letter “(f),” shall
be inserted.
(iii) In the said rules, in rule 4,-
(a) in clause (c), the words, brackets and letters “and having qualification mentioned
at clause (a) or (b)” shall be omitted;
(b) in Explanation II, the words “and examination or training” shall be omitted;
(c) after Explanation II, the following Explanation shall be inserted, namely :-
“Explanation III.─ For the purposes of this rule and Annexure IV, ‘equivalent’ shall
mean professional and technical qualifications which are recognised by the Ministry
of Human Resources and Development as equivalent to professional and technical
degree.”.
(iv) In the said rules, in rule 10, the words “and he may conduct valuation as per these
rules if required under any other law or by any other regulatory authority” shall be
omitted.
(v) In the said rules, in rule 11, the Explanation shall be omitted.
(vi) In the said rules, in rule 12, in sub-rule (1), in clause (ii), for the words “a professional
institute”, the words “it is a professional institute” shall be substituted.
4. Enforcement of the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Amendment Rules, 2019
vide Notification G.S.R. 131(E) dated 19th February, 2019
The Central Government makes the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties)
Amendment Rules, 2019 to amend the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules,
2014.
In the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014, for Rule 3, the following rule
shall be substituted:
“3. Adjudication of Penalties. - (1) The Central Government may appoint any of its
officers, not below the rank of Registrar, as adjudicating officers for adjudging penalty
under the provisions of the Act.
(2) Before adjudging penalty, the adjudicating officer shall issue a written notice in the
specified manner, to the company, the officer who is in default or any other person, as the
case may be, to show cause, within such period as may be specified in the notice (not
being less than 15 days and more than 30 days from the date of service thereon), why the
penalty should not be imposed on it or him.
(3) Every notice issued under sub-rule (2), shall clearly indicate the nature of non-
compliance or default under the Act alleged to have been committed or made by such
company, officer in default, or any other person, the company, and each of the officers in
default, or the other person. as the case may be and also draw attention to the relevant
penal provisions of the Act and the maximum penalty which can be imposed on the
company, and each of the officers in default, or the other person.
(4) The reply to such notice shall be filed in electronic mode only within the period as
specified in the notice.
However, the adjudicating officer may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, extend the
period referred to above by a further period not exceeding 15 days, if the company or
officer in default or any person as the case may be, satisfies the adjudicating officer that it
or he has sufficient cause for not responding to the notice within the stipulated period or
the adjudicating officer has reason to believe that the company or the officer or the person
has received a shorter notice and did not have reasonable time to give reply.
(5) If, after considering the reply submitted by such company, its officer, or any other
person, as the case may be, the adjudicating officer is of the opinion that physical
appearance is required, he shall issue a notice, within a period of 10 working days from
the date of receipt of reply fixing a date for the appearance of such company, through its
authorised representative, or officer of such company, or any other person, whether
personally or through his authorised representative.
If any person, to whom a notice is issued under sub-rule (2), desires to make an oral
representation, whether personally or through his authorised representative and has
indicated the same while submitting his reply in electronic mode, the adjudicating officer
shall allow such person to make such representation after fixing a date of appearance.
(6) On the date fixed for hearing and after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard
to the person concerned, the adjudicating officer may, subject to reasons to be recorded
in writing, pass any order in writing as he thinks fit including an order for adjournment:
Provided that after hearing, adjudicating officer may require the concerned person to
submit his reply in writing on certain other issues related to the notice under sub-rule (2),
relevant for determination of the default.
(7) The adjudicating officer shall pass an order,-
(a) within 30 days of the expiry of the period referred in sub-rule (2) or of such extended
period as referred therein, where physical appearance was not required under sub-
rule (5);
(b) within 90 days of the date of issue of notice under sub-rule (2), where any person
appeared before the adjudicating officer under sub-rule (5):
Provided that in case an order is passed after the aforementioned duration, the reasons of
the delay shall be recorded by the adjudicating officer and no such order shall be invalid
merely because of its passing after the expiry of such 30 days or 90 days as the case may
be.
(8) Every order of the adjudicating officer shall be duly dated and signed by him and shall
clearly state the reasons for requiring the physical appearance under sub-rule (5).
(9) The adjudicating officer shall send a copy of the order passed by him to the concerned
company, officer who is in default or any other person or all of them and to the Central
Government and a copy of the order shall also be uploaded on the website.
(10) For the purposes of this rule, the adjudicating officer shall exercise the following
powers, namely:-
(a) to summon and enforce the attendance of any person acquainted with the facts and
circumstances of the case after recording reasons in writing;
(b) to order for evidence or to produce any document, which in the opinion of the
adjudicating officer, may be relevant to the subject matter.
(11) If any person fails to reply or neglects or refuses to appear as required under sub-
rule (5) or sub-rule (10) before the adjudicating officer, the adjudicating officer may pass
an order imposing the penalty, in the absence of such person after recording the reasons
for doing so.
(12) While adjudging quantum of penalty, the adjudicating officer shall have due regard to
the following factors, namely:-
(a) size of the company;
(b) nature of business carried on by the company;
(c) injury to public interest;
(d) nature of the default;
(e) repetition of the default;
(f) the amount of disproportionate gain or unfair advantage, wherever quantifiable, made
as a result of the default; and
(g) the amount of loss caused to an investor or group of investors or creditors as a result
of the default:
However, in no case, the penalty imposed shall be less than the minimum penalty
prescribed, if any, under the relevant section of the Act.
(13) In case a fixed sum of penalty is provided for default of a provision, the adjudicating
officer shall impose that fixed sum, in case of any default therein.
(14) Penalty shall be paid through Ministry of Corporate Affairs portal only.
(15) All sums realised by way of penalties under the Act shall be credited to the
Consolidated Fund of India.
4. Amendments through the Companies (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2019 w.e.f.
2nd November, 2018
Relevant Amendment
sections
Amendment In section 447 of the principal Act, in the second proviso, for the
of section 447. words “twenty lakh rupees”, the words “fifty lakh rupees” shall be
substituted.
Amendment In section 454 of the principal Act, —
of section 454
(i) for sub-section (3), the following sub-section shall be
substituted, namely: —
“(3) The adjudicating officer may, by an order
(c) a person who is a trustee of a trust in which the beneficiary of the trust
includes the individual, or the terms of the trust confers a power on the
trustee which may be exercised for the benefit of the individual;
(d) a private company in which the individual is a director and holds along with
his relatives, more than two per cent. of its share capital;
(e) a public company in which the individual is a director and holds along with
relatives, more than two per cent. of its paid-up share capital;
(f) a body corporate whose board of directors, managing director or manager,
in the ordinary course of business, acts on the advice, directions or
instructions of the individual;
(g) a limited liability partnership or a partnership firm whose partners or
employees in the ordinary course of business, act on the advice, directions
or instructions of the individual;
(h) a person on whose advice, directions or instructions, the individual is
accustomed to act;
(i) a company, where the individual or the individual along with its related
party, own more than fifty per cent. of the share capital of the company or
controls the appointment of the board of directors of the company.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause,—
(a) "relative", with reference to any person, means anyone who is related to
another, in the following manner, namely:—
(i) members of a Hindu Undivided Family,
(ii) husband,
(iii) wife,
(iv) father,
(v) mother,
(vi) son,
(vii) daughter,
(viii) son's daughter and son,
(ix) daughter's daughter and son,
(x) grandson's daughter and son,
(xi) granddaughter's daughter and son,
(xii) brother,
(xiii) sister,
(b) in clause (ii), in sub-clause (b), for the word "repayment", the word "payment"
shall be substituted.
(7) Section 10 (3) of the principal Act, deals with the initiation of corporate insolvency
resolution process by corporate applicant, shall be substituted with the following-
"(3) The corporate applicant shall, along with the application, furnish—
(a) the information relating to its books of account and such other documents
for such period as may be specified;
(b) the information relating to the resolution professional proposed to be
appointed as an interim resolution professional; and
(c) the special resolution passed by shareholders of the corporate debtor or
the resolution passed by at least three-fourth of the total number of partners
of the corporate debtor, as the case may be, approving filing of the
application.";
(8) In Section 10 (4) related to the initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process
by corporate applicant, following amendments have been made—
(i) in clause (a), after the words "if it is complete", the words "and no disciplinary
proceeding is pending against the proposed resolution professional" shall be
inserted;
(ii) in clause (b), after the words "if it is incomplete", the words "or any disciplinary
proceeding is pending against the proposed resolution professional" shall be
inserted.
(9) In section 12(2) of the principal Act, related to the time limit for completion of
corporate insolvency resolution process, for the word "seventy-five", the word "sixty-
six" shall be substituted.
(10) After section 12 of the principal Act, the section 12A shall be inserted-
"12A. Withdrawal of application admitted under section 7, 9, or 10: The
Adjudicating Authority may allow the withdrawal of application admitted under section
7 or section 9 or section 10, on an application made by the applicant with the approval
of ninety per cent. voting share of the committee of creditors, in such manner as may
be specified."
(11) Section 14(3) of the principal Act which deals with the moratorium, shall be
substituted, with the following—
"(3) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply to—
(a) such transaction as may be notified by the Central Government in
consultation with any financial regulator;
(b) a surety in a contract of guarantee to a corporate debtor.".
(12) In section 15(1)(c) of the principal Act which deals with the provisions related to the
public announcement, for the word "claims", the words "claims, as may be specified"
shall be substituted.
(13) In section 16(5) of the principal Act which is related to the appointment and tenure
of interim resolution professional, for the words "shall not exceed thirty days from date
of his appointment", the words and figures "shall continue till the date of appointment
of the resolution professional under section 22" shall be substituted.
(14) In section 17(2)(d) of the principal Act which deals with the management of affairs of
corporate debtor by IRP, for the words "may be specified.", the words "may be
specified; and" shall be substituted;
(15) After section 17(2)(d) which deals with the management of affairs of corporate
debtor by IRP, the following section 17(2)(e), shall be inserted,
"(e) be responsible for complying with the requirements under any law for the time
being in force on behalf of the corporate debtor."
(16) In section 21 of the principal Act, which deals with the committee of creditors,
following are the relevant amendments —
(i) in sub-section (2), — in the proviso, for the words "related party to whom a
corporate debtor owes a financial debt", the words, brackets, figures and letter
"financial creditor or the authorised representative of the financial creditor
referred to in sub-section (6) or sub-section (6A) or sub-section (5) of section
24, if it is a related party of the corporate debtor," shall be substituted;
(ii) after this proviso under sub-section (2), the following proviso is inserted-
"Provided further that the first proviso shall not apply to a financial creditor,
regulated by a financial sector regulator, if it is a related party of the corporate
debtor solely on account of conversion or substitution of debt into equity shares
or instruments convertible into equity shares, prior to the insolvenc y
commencement date.";
(iii) Insertion of new sub-section 6(A) & 6(B) after sub-section (6)-
"(6A) Where a financial debt—
(a) is in the form of securities or deposits and the terms of the financial debt
provide for appointment of a trustee or agent to act as authorised
representative for all the financial creditors, such trustee or agent shall act
on behalf of such financial creditors;
(b) is owed to a class of creditors exceeding the number as maybe specified,
other than the creditors covered under clause (a) or sub-section (6), the
interim resolution professional shall make an application to the
Adjudicating Authority along with the list of all financial creditors, containing
the name of an insolvency professional, other than the interim resolution
professional, to act as their authorised representative who shall be
'25A. (1) Right to participate and Vote on behalf of FC: The authorised
representative(AR) under section 21(6) & 21(6A) or section 24(5) shall have the right
to participate and vote in meetings of the committee of creditors on behalf of the
financial creditor(FC) he represents in accordance with the prior voting instructions
of such creditors obtained through physical or electronic means.
Duty of AR to circulate agenda & minutes to FC: It shall be the duty of the
authorised representative to circulate the agenda and minutes of the meeting of the
committee of creditors to the financial creditor he represents.
AR to act on instruction of FC: The authorised representative shall not act against
the interest of the financial creditor he represents and shall always act in accordance
with their prior instructions:
Provided that if the authorised representative represents several financial creditors,
then he shall cast his vote in respect of each financial creditor in accordance with
instructions received from each financial creditor, to the extent of his voting share:
Provided further that if any financial creditor does not give prior instructions through
physical or electronic means, the authorised representative shall abstain from voting
on behalf of such creditor.
(2) To ensure recording of instruction by IRP/RP: The authorised representative
shall file with the committee of creditors any instructions received by way of physical
or electronic means, from the financial creditor he represents, for voting in
accordance therewith, to ensure that the appropriate voting instructions of the
financial creditor he represents is correctly recorded by the interim resolution
professional or resolution professional, as the case may be.
(21) Amendment in section 27(2) of the principal Act which deals with the Replacement
of Resolution Professional (RP) by Committee of creditors (CoC): This sub-section is
substituted with the following provision-
“The committee of creditors may, at a meeting, by a vote of sixty-six per cent. of voting
shares, resolve to replace the resolution professional appointed under section 22 with
another resolution professional, subject to a written consent from the proposed
resolution professional in the specified form."
(22) Amendment in section 28(3) of the principal Act which deals with the approval of
committee of creditors for certain actions, for the word, "seventy-five", the word "sixty-
six" shall be substituted.
(23) Amendment in Section 29 A, dealt with the persons not eligible to be resolution
applicant came into enforcement on 23rd day of Novem ber 2017 through the
enforcement of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2018 vide
notification dated 19th January, 2018.
"Provided that the Adjudicating Authority shall, before passing an order for
approval of resolution plan under this sub-section, satisfy that the resolution plan
has provisions for its effective implementation."
(b) after sub-section (3), the following sub-section shall be inserted namely:—
"(4) The resolution applicant shall, pursuant to the resolution plan approved
under sub-section (1), obtain the necessary approval required under any law for
the time being in force within a period of one year from the date of approval of
the resolution plan by the Adjudicating Authority under sub-section (1) or within
such period as provided for in such law, whichever is later:
Provided that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as
referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002, the resolution applicant
shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that Ac t
prior to the approval of such resolution plan by the committee of creditors."
26. Amendment made in section 33(2) of the principal Act. This section deals with the
initiation of liquidation process. Amendments made is that after the words "decision
of the committee of creditors", the words "approved by not less than sixty-six per cent.
of the voting share" shall be inserted.
27. In section 34 of the principal Act, which states of appointment of liquidator and fee
to be paid, following amendments are made—
a. in sub-section (1), for the words and figures "Chapter II shall", the words and
figures "Chapter II shall, subject to submission of a written consent by the
resolution professional to the Adjudicatory Authority in specified form," shall be
substituted;
b. in sub-section (4),—
i. in clause (b), for the words "in writing", the words "in writing; or" shall be
substituted;
ii. after clause (b), the following clause shall be inserted, namely:—
"(c) the resolution professional fails to submit written consent under sub-
section (1).";
c. in sub-section (5), for the word, brackets and letter "clause (a)", the words,
brackets and letters "clauses (a) and (c)" shall be substituted;
d. in sub-section (6), after the words "another insolvency professional", the words
"along with written consent from the insolvency professional in the specified
form," shall be inserted.
28. In section 42 of the principal Act, which deals with the provisions related to the appeal
against the decision of liquidator, after the words "of the liquidator", the words
"accepting or" shall be inserted.
29. In section 45(1) of the principal Act, which deals with the Avoidance of undervalued
transactions, the words and figures "of section 43" shall be omitted.
Important Note: With respect to amendments as covered above under Insolvenc y
and Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2018, only those amendments may
be taken into consideration which are pertaining to the provisions covered in the study
material. Also, the newly inserted sections i.e. 24A, 12A, 21 (6)(A), 21(6)(B) and 25A
of the said amendment are also applicable.
2. Usage of the word “any other person on behalf of the financial creditor, as may
be notified by the Central Government” under section 7(1) of the IBC has been
clarified by notification issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Vide Notification
S.O. 1091(E), dated 27th February, 2019, the Central Government hereby notifies
following persons who may file an application for initiating corporate insolvency
resolution process against a corporate debtor before the Adjudicating Authority, on
behalf of the financial creditor: -
(i) a guardian;
(ii) an executor or administrator of an estate of a financial creditor;
(iii) a trustee (including a debenture trustee); and
(v) a person duly authorised by the Board of Directors of a Company.
SECTION B: ALLIED LAWS
CHAPTER 20: SEBI ACT, 1992
Enforcement of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Ordinance, 2019
Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Ordinance, 2019 dated 21st February, 2019 has
substituted Clause (e) of sub-section (4) of Section 11 of the SEBI Act, 1992 which is as follows:
(e) attach, for a period not exceeding ninety days, bank accounts or other property of any
intermediary or any person associated with the securities market in any manner involved in
violation of any of the provisions of this Act, or the rules or the regulations made thereunder:
Provided that the Board shall, within ninety days of the said attachment, obtain confirmation of the
said attachment from the Special Court, established under section 26A, having jurisdiction and on
such confirmation, such attachment shall continue during the pendency of the aforesaid
proceedings and on conclusion of the said proceedings, the provisions of section 28A shall apply:
Provided further that only property, bank account or accounts or any transaction entered therein,
so far as it relates to the proceeds actually involved in violation of any of the provisions of this
Act, or the rules or the regulations made thereunder shall be allowed to be attached.
CHAPTER 21: The Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1956
Vide Finance Act, 2018, w.e.f 8.3.2019 following Changes are made in the SCRA-
(i) In the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (hereafter in this Part referred to as the
principal Act), section 12A shall be numbered as sub-section (1) thereof and after sub-
section (1) as so numbered, the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely:-
"(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1) and section 23-I, the Securities
and Exchange Board of India may, by an order, for reasons to be recorded in writing, levy
penalty under sections 23A, 23B, 23C, 23D, 23E, 23F, 23G, 23GA and 23H after holding
an inquiry in the prescribed manner.".
(ii) In section 23 of the principal Act, in sub-section (1), in the long line, after the words
"Adjudicating officer", the words "or the Securities and Exchange Board of India" shall be
inserted.
(iii) In section 23A of the principal Act, in sub-clause (a), after the words "bye-laws of the
recognised stock exchange", the words "or who furnishes false, incorrect or incomplete
information, document, books, return or report" shall be inserted.
(iv) In section 23E of the principal Act, after the words "mutual fund", the words "or real estate
investment trust or infrastructure investment trust or alternative investment fund", shall be
inserted.
(v) In section 23G of the principal Act, after the words "periodical returns", the words "or
furnishes false, incorrect or incomplete periodical returns" shall be inserted.
(vi) After section 23G of the principal Act, the following section shall be inserted, namely:-
"23GA. Where a stock exchange or a clearing corporation fails to conduct its business with
its members or any issuer or its agent or any person associated with the securities markets
in accordance with the rules or regulations made by the Securities and Exchange Board of
India and the directions issued by it under this Act, the stock exchange or the clearing
corporations, as the case may be, shall be liable to penalty which shall not be less than
five crore rupees but which may extend to twenty-five crore rupees or three times the
amount of gains made out of such failure, whichever is higher.".
(vii) In section 23-I of the principal Act, in sub-section (1), for the word ''shall'', the word ''may''
shall be substituted.
(viii) In section 23J of the principal Act,-
(a) for the marginal heading, the following marginal heading shall be substituted,
namely:- "Factors to be taken into account while adjudging quantum of penalty.";
(b) for the word, figures and letter "section 23-I" the words, figures and letters "section
12A or section 23-I" shall be substituted.
(c) for the words "the adjudicating officer", the words "the Securities and Exchange Board
of India or the adjudicating officer" shall be substituted.
(ix) In section 23JA of the principal Act, after sub-section (4), the following sub-section shall
be inserted, namely:-
"(5) All settlement amounts, excluding the disgorgement amount and legal costs, realised
under this Act shall be credited to the Consolidated Fund of India.".
(x) In section 23JB of the principal Act, in sub-section (1), for the words "by the adjudicating
officer", the words "under this Act" shall be substituted.
(xi) After section 23JB of the principal Act, the following section shall be inserted, namely:-
'23JC. (1) Where a person dies, his legal representative shall be liable to pay any sum
which the deceased would have been liable to pay, if he had not died, in the like manner
and to the same extent as the deceased: Provided that, in case of any penalty payable
under this Act, a legal representative shall be liable only in case the penalty has been
imposed before the death of the deceased person.
(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1),- (a) any proceeding for disgorgement, refund or an
action for recovery before the Recovery Officer under this Act, except a proceeding for levy
of penalty, initiated against the deceased before his death shall be deemed to have been
initiated against the legal representative, and may be continued against the legal
representative from the stage at which it stood on the date of the death of the deceased
and all the provisions of this Act shall apply accordingly; (b) any proceeding for
disgorgement, refund or an action for recovery before the Recovery Officer under this Act,
except a proceeding for levy of penalty, which could have been initiated against the
deceased if he had survived, may be initiated against the legal representative and all the
provisions of this Act shall apply accordingly.
(3) Every legal representative shall be personally liable for any sum payable by him in his
capacity as legal representative if, while his liability for such sum remains undischarged,
he creates a charge on or disposes of or parts with any assets of the estate of the
deceased, which are in, or may come into, his possession, but such liability shall be limited
to the value of the asset so charged, disposed of or parted with.
(4) The liability of a legal representative under this section shall, be limited to the extent to
which the estate of the deceased is capable of meeting the liability. Explanation.-For the
purposes of this section ''Legal representative" means a person who in law represents the
estate of a deceased person, and includes any person who intermeddles with the estate
of the deceased and where a party sues or is sued in a representative character, the person
on whom the estate devolves on the death of the party so suing or sued.'.
(xii) In section 23M of the principal Act,-
(1) after the words "adjudicating officer" at both the places where they occur, the words "or
the Securities and Exchange Board of India" shall be inserted;
(2 in sub-section (2), for the words, "any of his direction or orders" the words "the direction
or order" shall be substituted.
QUESTIONS
Multiple Choice Questions
1. Mr. Ram gave two of his friends’ cash amount of ` Two lakh each for their business
purposes. Later at the time of return, he asked both of them, in lieu of the same, to buy his
product via credit card and online transfers in installments through next couple of months’
time for which he issued bills to adjust the amount in his account books.
Does this payment system through credit card and online transfer mode are covered under
Money Laundering Act?
(a) No, because payments are made through credit cards & being an online transfer, it’s a
genuine transaction.
(b) Yes, money laundering transactions done via credit card and online payments comes
under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
(c) No, it is not money laundering as none of Mr. Ram friends are benefiting from this
transaction.
(d) No, because the transactions are not done with shell companies.
2. Amazon Limited was incorporated on 23 rd March, 2019. You are one of the promoter and
Director of the Company. You are explaining the other promoters that we need to appoint
First Auditor within 30 days from the date of Incorporation of the Company. How will you
guide them and appoint first auditor for the Company?
(a) You will ask other shareholders to have a meeting and appoint first auditor until the
conclusion of first annual general meeting;
(b) You will ask other shareholders to have a meeting and appoint first auditor for the
period of 5 years;
(c) You will ask Board of Directors to have a meeting and appoint first auditor for the
period of 5 years;
(d) You will ask Board of Directors to have a meeting and appoint first auditor until the
conclusion of first annual general meeting.
3. Mr. Satya, file a petition for default of non –payment of the debt against Mr. X. The amount
in default claimed by petitioner was ` 30 lakh. Mr. X (Respondent) pleaded before the
adjudicating authority that the amount of claim was not belonging to the
applicant/petitioner. Mr. Satya, asserted that he himself with his son owns ` 26 Lakh to
the respondent. Though nowhere in the petition he admitted that he himself with his Son
owns ` 26 Lakh to the respondent. Considering the above facts in the light of the
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, state the action to be taken by the Adjudicating
Authority-
(a) NCLT will admit the application of Mr. Satya, as he jointly with his son owned the debt
to Mr. X, so he is a valid petitioner.
(b) NCLT will admit the application filed by Mr. Satya on behalf of his son.
(c) NCLT will reject the application considering that no default has occurred against Mr.
Satya, and his stand as a financial creditor is not proved in the petition.
(d) NCLT will dismiss the application on the ground of non-clarity as to existence of
dispute in favour of Mr. Satya.
4. How many times Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process period can be extended?
(a) shall not be granted more than once
(b) shall be granted more than once
(c) shall be granted more than twice on the reasonable cause
(d) cannot be granted at all
5. Mr. Z was appointed as representative of ABC Company for a corporate programme
organized in USA. During the said period in USA, he was diagnosed with the severe kidney
disease, so decided to have a kidney transplant done in USA. State the maximum amount
that can be drawn by Mr. Z as foreign exchange for the medical treatment abroad.
(a) USD 1,25,000
(b) USD 2,25,000
(c) USD 2,50,000
(d) As estimated by a medical institute offering treatment
6. Beauti Fashion Garments Limited has three independent directors besides eight others of
its own. Due to the urgency of transacting certain important business, a Board Meeting
was called by giving a shorter notice than the legally required. However, none of the
independent directors was present at the Meeting to deliberate upon the motion related to
that business. Despite absence of all the independent directors, a board resolution was
passed for operationalizing the business by the directors personally present at that Meeting
who were much more than the required quorum. Advise, whether the resolution passed at
the Board Meeting called at a shorter notice was valid.
(a) The resolution so passed is valid, for it was passed at the Board Meeting where the
required quorum was present.
(b) To be valid the resolution so passed needs to be circulated to all the directors and further,
it is required to be ratified by all the three independent directors.
(c) To be valid the resolution so passed needs to be circulated to all the directors and further,
it is required to be ratified by at least two independent directors.
(d) To be valid the resolution so passed needs to be circulated to all the directors and further,
it is required to be ratified by at least one independent director.
7. Sunila Interior Decorators and Furnishers Limited which has not accessed the primary
market so far, is required to appoint whole-time Key Managerial Personnel (KMPs) in view
of the fact that it has surpassed the threshold limit which necessitates such appointment.
Out of the three whole-time KMPs which it is obligated to keep on roll, it has already
appointed a Managing Director (MD) and a Company Secretary. From the given options,
choose the third KMP which needs to be appointed by the company under the given
circumstances.
(a) Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
(b) Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
(c) Whole-time Director (WTD)
(d) Chief Manager (CM)
8. X Ltd. amalgamated with Y Ltd. The transferee company decided to dispose of the books
and papers of the X Ltd. in order to come up with maintenance of revised book and papers
under the name of the transferee company to bring all the financial details of the
amalgamated company also in the records. State the correct statement as to decision of
the transferee company on the disposal of the Books and papers of the X Ltd.
(a) Decision of transferee company is invalid, as books and papers of the amalgamated
company shall be maintained for atleast three years.
(b) Decision of transferee company is invalid, as books and papers of amalgamated
company shall be maintained for at least eight years.
(c) Decision of transferee company will be valid only on the sanction of the prior
permission of the Central Government.
(d) Decision of transferee company will be valid only after seeking prior permission of the
requisite number of the creditors/shareholders of the amalgamated company.
Descriptive Questions:
9. Draft a Specimen Board Resolution passed in the meeting of the Board of Directors of a
recently incorporated BLM Limited for obtaining Goods and Service Tax (GST) Registration
in the GST System Portal.
10. Dragon Copper Limited was facing acute financial difficulty as operations were
continuously disrupted due to (a) non-availability of raw material (b) successive drought in
its marketing areas and loss of demand and (c) frequent breakdown due to non-
replacement of old plant and machinery. On the verge of liquidation, the Management
proposes one last Arrangement between creditors and the company, whereby the creditors
have to forego 50% of their dues to the company. This has evoked strong protest from
some of the creditors who may block the arrangement. Examine the arrangement in the
light of the Companies Act, 2013 and advise the course of action/procedure to be adopted
by the company to implement the same.
11. Clarks Limited, has made default in filing financial statements and annual returns for a
continuous period of 4 financial years ending on 31 st March, 2019. The Registrar of
Companies having jurisdiction approached the Central Government to accord sanction to
present a petition to Tribunal (NCLT) for the winding up of the company as per the above
ground under Section 272 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Examine the validity of the RoC move, explaining the relevant provisions of the Companies
Act, 2013. State the time limit for passing an order by the Tribunal under Section 273 of
the Companies Act, 2013?
12. Popular Limited defaulted in the repayment of term loan taken from a Bank against security
created as a first charge on some of its assets. The bank issued notice pursuant to Section
13 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to the Company to discharge its liabilities within a period of
60 days from the date of the notice. The company failed to discharge its liabilities within
the time limit specified.
Explain the measures to be taken by the Bank to enforce its security interest under the
said Act.
13. Mr. Daksh, an Indian National desires to obtain foreign exchange for the following
purposes:
(i) Payment to be made for securing health insurance from a company abroad.
(ii) Payment of commission on exports under Rupee State Credit Route.
Advise whether he can get foreign exchange and if so, under what condition?
14. Creative India Limited owes a sum of ` 2,80,000 to S, who assigns this debt to his two
creditors, Mr. R–to the extent of ` 1,40,000 and Mr. M- to the extent of ` 1,40,000. Mr. M
makes a demand for his money from the company by giving a legal notice. The company
could not meet Mr. M’s demand or otherwise satisfy him till the expiry of four weeks from
the date of notice. Mr. M, therefore, moves to NCLT with an application for initiation of
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, decide whether an application filed by Mr. M can
be accepted by NCLT.
15. Poly Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as “Seller”), manufacturer of footwears entered into an
agreement with City Traders (hereinafter referred to as “purchaser”), for sale of its
products. The agreement includes, among others, the following clauses:
(i) That the Purchaser shall not deal with goods, products, articles, by whatever name
called, manufactured by any person other than the Seller.
(ii) That the Purchaser shall not sell the goods manufactured by the Seller outside the
municipal limits of the city of Secunderabad.
(iii) That the Purchaser shall sell the goods manufactured by the Seller at the price as
embossed on the price label of the footwear. However, the purchaser is allowed to
sell the footwear at prices lower than those embossed on the price label.
You are required to examine with relevant provisions of the Competition Act 2002, the
validity of the above clauses.
16. Mr. Zubin (Member of SEBI) was adjudged as an insolvent by the Adjudicating authority.
As of that, a group of complainants have alleged that Mr. Zubin while rendering of his
services in office may be biased in the performance of his duties. Working in such a state
of position, may be detrimental to the public interest and so should be removed from his
office. Advise in the given situation, the tenability of maintenance of complaint against
Mr. Zubin.
17. The Board of Directors of XYZ Company Limited at its meeting declared a divi dend on its
paid-up equity share capital which was later on approved by the company`s Annual
General Meeting. In the meantime, the directors at another meeting of the Board decided
by passing a resolution to divert the total dividend to be paid to shareholders for purchase
of investments for the company. As a result, dividend was paid to shareholders after 45
days. Examining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, state:
(i) Whether the act of directors is in violation of the provisions of the Act and also the
consequences that shall follow for the above act of directors?
(ii) What would be your answer in case the amount of dividend to a shareholder is
adjusted by the company against certain dues to the company from the shareholder?
18. Referring to the provisions of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 state how a
recognized stock exchange may delist the securities and how an appeal may be filed by
an aggrieved investor against the decision of stock exchange for delisting of securities.
19. Neeraj was given an offer by a company vendor to disclose him the lowest bid quoted by
other vendors. Neeraj accessed the computer of his Executive Director and passed on the
lowest quotation to the vendor and thus helped him in quoting the lowest among all the
bids. Examine and analyse the situation and conclude how Neeraj will be held liable under
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002?
20. Broadway Infrastructure Limited entered into a contract with Royal forgings
(a partnership firm), in which wife of Mr. Patrick, a director of the Broadway Infrastructure
Limited is a partner. The contract is for supply of certain components by the firm for a
period of three years with effect from 1 st September, 2018 on credit basis. Explain the
requirements under the Companies Act, 2013, which should have been complied with by
Broadway Infrastructure Limited before entering into contract with Royal forgings.
What would be your answer in case Royal forgings is a private Limited company in which
wife of Mr. Patrick is holding shares?
21. A group of shareholders consisting of 30 members decide to file a petition before the
Tribunal for relief against oppression and mismanagement by the Board of Directors of
Aravalli Manufacturing Limited having a paid up Share capital of ` 1 crore. The company
has a total of 500 members and the group of 30 members holds one-tenth of the total paid
up share capital accounting for one-fifteenth of the issued share capital. The grievance of
the group is that due to the mismanagement by the Board of Directors, the company is
incurring losses and has not declared any dividend for the past five years. In light of the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, please advise the group of shareholders regarding
the admission of the petition and the relief thereof.
22. Gaurav Textile Company Limited has entered into a contract with a Company. You are
invited to read and interpret the document of contract. What rules of interpretation of deeds
and documents would you apply while doing so?
SUGGESTED ANSWERS/HINTS
1. (b)
2. (d)
3. (c)
4. (a)
5. (d)
6. (d)
7. (b)
8. (c)
9. Resolution passed at the meeting of Board of Directors of BLM Limited held at its registered
office situated ---------------------- on ----------------, 2019 at ------------- A.M.
RESOLVED THAT the Board do hereby appoint Mr. -------------- Director of the company
as Authorized Signatory for enrolment of the Company on the Goods and Service Tax
(GST) System Portal and to sign (physically or digitally as and when required) and submit
various documents electronically and/or physically and to make applications,
communications, representations, modifications or alterations and to give explanations on
behalf of the Company before the Central GST and/or the concerned State GST authorities
as and when required.
FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Mr. ______, Director of the company be and is hereby
authorized to represent the Company and to take necessary actions on all issues related
to goods and service tax including but not limited to presenting documents/records etc. on
behalf of the Company representing for registration of the Company and also to make any
alterations, additions, corrections, to the documents, papers, forms, etc., filed with tax
authorities and to provide explanations as and when required.
FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Mr. ------------, Director of the company be and is hereby
authorized on behalf of the company to sign the returns, documents, letters,
correspondences etc. physically/digitally and to represent on behalf of the company, for
assessments, appeals or otherwise before the goods and service tax authorities as and
when required.
10. Scheme of Compromise or arrangement (Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013):
The scheme provides for sacrifice on the part of creditors as they have to forego 50% of
their dues to the company. The company is sick and therefore it can be considered as a
company liable to be wound up within the meaning of Section 230(a) of the Companies
Act, 2013. The proposed scheme involves as a compromise or arrangement with creditors
and it attracts section 230.
While the company or any creditor or member can make application to the Tribunal under
section 230 (6)(1), it is usual for the company to make an application. On such application,
the Tribunal may order that a meeting of creditors and/or members be called and held as
per directions of the Tribunal.
Company must arrange to send notice of meeting to every creditor containing a statement
setting forth the terms of compromise or arrangement explaining its effect. Material interest
of directors, Managing Director, or manager of the company in the scheme and the effect
of scheme on their interest should be fully disclosed [Section 230(1)(a)]. Advertisement
issued by the company must comply with the requirements of section 230(2). At the
meetings convened, as per directions of the Tribunal, majority in number representing at
least ninety percent in value of creditors present and voting (either in person or by proxy if
allowed) must agree to compromise or arrangement.
Thereafter the company must present a petition to the Tribunal for confirmation of the
compromise or arrangement. The notice of application made by the company will be served
on the Central Government and the Tribunal will take into consideration representation, If,
any made by the Central Government. The Tribunal will sanction the scheme, if it is
satisfied that the company has disclosed all material facts relating to the company e.g.
latest financial position, auditors report on accounts of the company, pendency of
investigation of company, etc.
Copy of Tribunal order must be filed with the Registrar of Companies and then only the
order will come into effect. Copy of Tribunal order must be annexed to every Memorandum
of Association issued thereafter.
If the Tribunal sanctions the scheme, it will be binding on all members and creditors even
those who were dissenting.
11. Validity of RoC's action: According to Section 271(d) of the Companies Act, 2013, a
Company may, on a petition under Section 272, be wound up by the Tribunal, if the
Company has made a default in filing with the Registrar its financial statements or annual
returns for immediately preceding five consecutive financial years.
In the instant case, the move by RoC to present a petition to Tribunal for the winding up of
Clarks Limited is not valid as the Company has made default in filing financial statements
and annual returns for a continuous period of 4 financial years ending on 31st March, 2019.
Time limit for passing of an Order under section 273: An order under section 273 of
the Act shall be made within ninety days from the date of presentation of the petition.
12. Sub-section (4) of section 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002, provides that if the borrower fails
to discharge his liability in full within the 60 days, the secured creditor may take recourse
to one or more of the following measures to recover his secured debt:
(i) take possession of the secured assets of the borrower including the right to transfer
by way of lease, assignment or sale for realising the secured asset;
(ii) take over the management of the business of the borrower including the right to
transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale for realising the secured asset:
Provided that the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale shall be
exercised only where the substantial part of the business of the borrower is held as
security for the debt:
Provided further that where the management of whole of the business or part of the
business is severable, the secured creditor shall take over the management of such
business of the borrower which is relatable to the security for the debt;
(iii) appoint any person (hereafter referred to as the manager), to manage the secured
assets the possession of which has been taken over by the secured creditor;
(iv) require at any time by notice in writing, any person who has acquired any of the
secured assets from the borrower and from whom any money is due or may become
due to the borrower, to pay the secured creditor, so much of the money as is sufficient
to pay the secured debt.
In the instant case, the Bank may take the above mentioned procedure to enforce its
security interest in case Popular Limited has failed to discharge its liabilities within the time
limit specified.
13. Any person may sell or draw foreign exchange to or from an authorized person if such sale
or drawal is a current account transaction. However, the Central Government may in public
interest and in consultation with the RBI, impose such reasonable restrictions for current
account transactions as may be prescribed (Section 5). The Central Government has
framed Foreign Exchange Management (Current Account T ransactions) Rules, 2000.
The Rules stipulate some prohibitions and restrictions on drawal of foreign exchange for
certain purposes. In the light of provisions of these rules, the answer to the given problem
is as follows:
(i) Drawl of foreign exchange for securing health insurance from a company abroad does
not fall under any of the Schedules I, II or Ill. Therefore, such a transaction is permitted
without any restriction or condition.
(ii) Rule 3 read with Schedule I of Foreign Exchange Management (Current Account
Transactions) Rules, 2000 prohibits payment of commission on exports under Rupees
State Credit Route (except commission upto 10% of invoice value of exports of tea
and tobacco). Therefore, payment of commission on exports under Rupee State
Credit Route is prohibited unless such commission is paid for export of tea and
tobacco, and the commission does not exceed 10% of invoice value of exports.
14. Financial creditor can initiate corporate insolvency resolution process himself or jointly with
other financial creditors against corporate debtor on default of payment of debt of
` 1,00,000 or more. Assignee of financial debt is also financial creditor as per section 5
(7) of the IBC, 2016. Mr. M's application can be accepted by NCLT if company fails to pay
debt within stipulated time. Application should be supported with a copy of the assignment
or transfer agreement and other relevant documents as may be required to demonstrate
the assignment or transfer.
15. Provisions of section 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 prohibit any agreement for
goods and/or services that may have an appreciable adverse effect on competition
in India.
Provisions of section 3(2) of the said Act state that any agreement entered into in
contravention of provision of section 3(1) of the said Act shall be void.
Sections 3(3) and 3(4) of the said Act enumerate the types of the agreements which are to
be treated as contravening the provisions of the said section 3(1). According to section
3(4) of the said Act, any agreement among enterprises or persons at different stages of
the production chain in different markets, in respect of production, supply, distribution,
storage, sale or price of, or trade in goods or provision of services including the following
shall be treated as agreements in contravention of the said section 3(1):
(a) tie-in-arrangement;
(b) exclusive supply agreement;
(c) exclusive distribution agreement;
(d) refusal to deal
(e) re-sale price maintenance
The clauses of the agreement given in the question are c overed by above mentioned
provisions Clause at Sr. No.(i) comes under exclusive supply agreement; Clause at Sr.
No.(ii) comes under exclusive distribution agreement and Clause at Sr. No.(iii) is covered
by re-sale price maintenance.
Explanations to said section 3(4) explains the above terms.
his services in a biased manner. This may be unfavorable to the public interest and so
should be removed from his office.
Here, above complainants may approach the Central Government for removal of Mr. Zubin,
and if the Central Government is of the opinion that Mr. Zubin was not competent in
rendering of his services/duties in a office as a member of the Board, the Central
Government may remove Mr. Zubin from his office in compliance with the sad provision.
17. According to section 124 of the Companies Act, 2013, where a dividend has been declared
by a company but has not been paid or claimed within 30 days from the date of the
declaration to any shareholder entitled to the payment of the dividend, the company shall,
within 7 days from the date of expiry of the said period of 30 days, transfer the total amount
of dividend which remains unpaid or unclaimed to a special account to be opened by the
company in that behalf in any scheduled bank to be called the Unpaid Dividend Account.
Further, according to section 127 of the Companies Act, 2013, where a dividend has been
declared by a company but has not been paid or the warrant in respect thereof has not
been posted within 30 days from the date of declaration to any shareholder entitled to the
payment of the dividend, every director of the company shall, if he is knowingly a party to
the default, is liable for the punishment under the said section.
In the present case, the Board of Directors of XYZ Company Limited at its meeting declared
a dividend on its paid-up equity share capital which was later on approved by the
company’s Annual General Meeting. In the meantime, the directors at another meeting of
the Board decided by passing a resolution to divert the total dividend to be paid to
shareholders for purchase of investment for the company. As a result, dividend was paid
to shareholders after 45 days.
(i) 1. Since, declared dividend has not been paid or claimed within 30 days from the
date of the declaration to any shareholder entitled to the payment of the
dividend, the company shall, within 7 days from the date of expiry of the said
period of 30 days, transfer the total amount of dividend which remains unpaid or
unclaimed to a special account to be opened by the company in that behalf in
any scheduled bank to be called the Unpaid Dividend Account.
2. The Board of Directors of XYZ Company Limited is in violation of section 127 of
the Companies Act, 2013 as it failed to pay dividend to shareholders within 30
days due to their decision to divert the total dividend to be paid to shareholders
for purchase of investment for the company.
Consequences: The following are the consequences for the violation of above
provisions:
(a) Every director of the company shall, if he is knowingly a party to the default,
be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to two years and shall
also be liable for a fine which shall not be less than one thousand rupees
for every day during which such default continues.
(b) The company shall also be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of 18%
p.a. during the period for which such default continues.
(ii) If the amount of dividend to a shareholder is adjusted by the company against certain
dues to the company from the shareholder, then failure to pay dividend within 30 days
shall not be deemed to be an offence under Proviso to section 127 of the Companies
Act, 2013.
18. According to section 21A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 the delisting
of securities may take place in the following manner:-
(1) A recognized stock exchange may delist the securities, after recording the reasons
therefore, from any recognized stock exchange on any of the ground/s as may be
prescribed under this Act.
Provided that the securities of a company shall not be delisted unless the company
concerned has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard,
(2) A listed company or an aggrieved investor may file an appeal before the Securities
Appellate Tribunal against the decision of the recognized stock exchange delisting
the securities within fifteen days from the date of the decision of the recognized stock
exchange delisting the securities and the Provisions of section 22B to 22E of this Act,
shall apply as far as may be, to such appeals.
Provided that the Securities Appellate Tribunal may, if it is satisfied that the company
was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within the said period, allow
it to be filed within a further period not exceeding one month.
19. Neeraj has contravened the Prevention of Money Laundering Act under Part A Para 22 of
Schedule. Section 72 of Information of Technology Act 2000, provides the punishment for
the person who breached the confidentiality and privacy without the consent of the person
concerned.
Neeraj in the give case, acted without the consent of his Executive Director accessed the
electronic records and passed on the official information to the vendor without permission.
This information can produce large profits and legitimize the ill-gotten gains through money
laundering. Hence, Mr. Neeraj is punishable under section 3 and section 4 of the
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 which provides rigorous imprisonment for a
term which shall not be less than three years, but which may extend to seven years and
shall also be liable to fine.
20. The contract for supply of components entered into between Broadway Infrastructure
Limited and Royal forgings, a partnership firm (in which wife of Mr. Patrick, a director of
the Broadway Infrastructure Limited is a partner) attracts Section 184, 188 and 189 of the
Companies Act, 2013.
As per Section 188, company cannot enter into contract with firm for supply or purchase
of goods or material where director of company or his relative is partner of firm without
approval of Board of directors at board meeting. As per Section 184, interested directors
must disclose his interest at board meeting at which said business is to be discussed.
Interested directors should not take part in the discussion or voting at board meeting. If he
does vote, his vote shall not be counted. In case of Private limited Company interested
director can participate in the board meeting after disclosure of interest.
As per Section 189, prescribed particulars of the contract must be entered into the Register
of Contract in which directors are interested in Form MBP-4. Every entry made in Register
should be authenticated by Company Secretary of company or any other person authorized
by Board. After each entry in the register, it shall be placed before the next board meeting
and shall be signed by all the directors present thereat.
Based upon discussion of the above provisions:
If the value of the contract or transaction is exceeded than limit specified, prior approval of
shareholders is required to be obtained. Question does not suggest value of transaction.
Assuming that it is within limits specified under the Act, consent of shareholders is not
required.
If Royal forgings is a private limited company: The provision of Section 188 are
applicable to it. As the directors wife (i.e Patrick’s wife) is member of Royal forgings private
limited.
Section 184 is not applicable as Mr. Patrick, director of Broadway Infrastructure Limited is
neither director or holding any shares in Royal Forgings Private Limited. Shares held by
Mr. Patrick's wife are not to be considered. Hence the provisions of Section 184 are not
attracted.
21. Section 244 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the right to apply to the Tribunal for relief
against oppression and mis-management. This right is available only when the petitioners
hold the prescribed limit of shares as indicated below:
(i) In the case of company having a share capital, not less than 100 members of the
Company or not less than one tenth of the total number of its members whichever is
less or any member or members holding not less than one tenth of the issued share
capital of the company, provided that the applicant(s) have paid all calls and other
dues on the shares.
(ii) In the case of company not having share capital, not less than one-fifth of the total
number of its members.
As per the facts, a group of 30 members decided to file a petition. Total number of members
are 500 and one tenth of 500 will be 50 and lower of above is 50. Thus, the group of
shareholders who decides to file the petition are less than 50. However, the group of 30
members holds one-fifteenth of the issued share capital which is less than the required
one tenth of the issued share capital. In view of this, the group is not having requisite
number of shares and shareholding for being eligible to approach the Tribunal for relief.
Also, the shareholders may not succeed in getting any relief from the tribunal as continuous
losses cannot, by itself, be regarded as oppression. Similarly, the failure to declare
dividend or payment of low dividends also does not amount to oppression.
22. The rules regarding interpretation of deeds and documents are as follows:
First and the foremost point that has to be borne in mind is that one has to find out what
reasonable man, who has taken care to inform himself of the surrounding circumstances
of a deed or a document, and of its scope and intendments, would understand by the words
used in that deed or document.
It is inexpedient to construe the terms of one deed by reference to the terms of another.
Further, it is well established that the same word cannot have two different meanings in
the same documents, unless the context compels the adoption of such a rule.
The Golden Rule is to ascertain the intention of the parties of the instrument after
considering all the words in the documents/deed concerned in their ordinary, natural sense.
For this purpose, the relevant portions of the document have to be considered as a whole.
The circumstances in which the particular words have been used have also to be taken
into account. Very often, the status and training of the parties using the words have also
to be taken into account as the same words maybe used by a ordinary person in one sense
and by a trained person or a specialist in quite another sense and a special sense. It has
also to be considered that very many words are used in more than one sense. It may
happen that the same word understood in one sense will give effect to all the clauses in
the deed while taken in another sense might render one or more of the clauses ineffective.
In such a case the word should be understood in the former and not in the latter sense.
It may also happen that there is a conflict between two or more clauses of the same
documents. An effect must be made to resolve the conflict by interpreting the clauses so
that all the clauses are given effect. If, however, it is not possible to give effect of all of
them, then it is the earlier clause that will override the latter one.