Synopsis (AutoRecovered)
Synopsis (AutoRecovered)
1.0 TITLE: Impact of Online Food Ordering Applications on Traditional Food Industry in India
2.0 INTRODUCTION
With the boom in digital industry across the globe, it’s had its impact on the Indian economy too.
The online food ordering firms have sprouted up in bulk. India's rising middle class has driven
the growth of the online food delivery sector, with research firm RedSeer Consulting saying
order numbers rose 176% in 2018. Key highlights are:
The industry is dominated by local start-ups Swiggy, backed by Naspers and Tencent, and
Zomato, which counts Sequoia as an investor.
Uber Technologies launched its India food delivery service UberEats in 2017 .
Uber rival Ola also launched a food delivery service and bought Foodpanda in 2017.
Amazon.com Inc is planning a foray into the burgeoning online food delivery business in
India this year
Indian online food delivery market is currently exhibiting robust growth. Five years ago, there
were only a handful of online food aggregators. Today, the industry is a behemoth that ferries 80
million orders each month in over 500 cities. In all, food aggregators like Zomato, Swiggy, and
Uber Eats deploy over 400,000 delivery boys and girls daily on the ground in the country. The
growth of the online food delivery market in the India has been primarily driven by:
The two biggest players in the Indian online food delivery market are Swiggy and Zomato. Other
major players include Food Panda, Uber Eats, Dominos, etc. The online food delivery market is
mainly concentrated in the urban regions of the country with Bangalore, Delhi and Mumbai
currently representing the three largest markets.
2.2 IMPORTANCE AND PURPOSE OF STUDY
Ordering food online is convenient and restaurants gain from the extra visibility. But who is
raking in the profits? Five years into the food delivery boom, many restaurants have now come
to the conclusion that they are losing more than they gain. The biggest irritant is the steep
discounting game which has started to hurt margins. Restaurants—both big and small—say they
are increasingly finding themselves being coerced into accepting terms and conditions
favourable to online aggregators. These include:
Funding a large part of the discounts
Using only the aggregators’ fleet to fulfil delivery
Drastic reduction in meal preparation time
Complete non-transparency over how in-app recommendations work and what restaurants
can do to get recommended more often.
Moreover, aggregators have now also entered into other businesses such as opening up of dark
kitchens (which only prepare food for delivery) or owned-food brands, apart from exclusively
serving cuisines that are favoured among diners in particular areas of a city where demand for
such food is high—which is, again, seen as a direct threat to restaurant chains.
For decades, India’s restaurant business was largely built on dine-in as well as deliveries in the
neighbourhood, but a surge in smartphone penetration and cheap mobile data plans has helped
fuel access to food ordering apps. Backed by some of the world’s largest venture funds, Zomato,
Swiggy, and Uber Eats have disrupted the market. Over 90% of India’s organized food services
market is dine-in, with delivery now at 8% (estimated sales of ₹12,140 crore), according to a
2019 food service report compiled by the NRAI. Food aggregators have, in a sense, emerged at
an opportune moment. But over time, as online food orders have started to surge, what was
supposed to be a symbiotic relationship between the two booming sectors is turning sour.
This study will help evaluate the impact of online food service apps on conventional restaurant
business in India
The study, titled 'Digital Platforms Reign in the Food Ordering Market', said the growth in
online food ordering market has been attributed to the rising number of women in working
population in most of the metro cities.
According to the study, 95 per cent of the respondents surveyed order food online, owing to
promotional offers and discounts, while 84 per cent individuals said its hassle-free and time-
saving.
It added that 78 per cent of the individuals order food online because its convenient. And 73
per cent order food online because of a wide variety of cuisines on a single-click.
Bengaluru gets the highest number of online orders as compared to other cities with 20 per
cent of the market share acquired by the southern city, the report said.
It is followed by Mumbai, Pune, Delhi and Hyderabad with a share of 18 per cent, 17 per
cent, 15 per cent and 12 per cent, respectively, while other cities accounted for 18 per cent of
the market share.
The National Restaurant Association of India (NRAI) Tuesday said it has raised concerns
over deep discounting and data masking by food ordering and delivery firms such as Swiggy,
Zomato and Foodpanda.
The restaurants' body said it flagged issues regarding misuse of dominant position, in a
meeting with the app-based food ordering and delivery firms.
1.4 OBJECTIVES
To understand the impact of online education on coaching institutes.
To determine the scope of online education in India in future. (AI, Big Data)
To understand the impact of online learning activities on learning outcomes of
students.
To understand the perception and attitude towards the online education apps.
To understand the factors which a student takes into consideration before selecting
any online learning app.
2015
SAMPLING PROCESS
SAMPLE SIZE
Sample size will be calculated after preparing the questionnaire. Since factor analysis will be
used in this study therefore the minimum no. of sample size depends on the no.of variables
that will be used in the questionnaire.
17.0 REFERENCES
Singh, S.S., Rylander, D., & Mims, T.C. (2012). “Efficiency of Online vs. Offline Learning:
A Comparison of Inputs and Outcomes”, International Journal of Business, Humanities and
Technology, Vol. 2 No. 1 pp. 93 – 98
Desiree Wieser, Jürgen-Matthias Seeler, (2018), Online, Not Distance Education: The Merits
of Collaborative Learning in Online Education, in Andreas Altmann, Bernd Ebersberger,
Claudia Mössenlechner, Desiree Wieser (ed.) The Disruptive Power of Online Education,
pp.125 – 146