Oxford University Press American Institute of Biological Sciences
Oxford University Press American Institute of Biological Sciences
Oxford University Press American Institute of Biological Sciences
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Oxford University Press and American Institute of Biological Sciences are collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to BioScience.
http://www.jstor.org
the
Understanding dimensions of biological literacy
ne outcome of the recent The dimensions of gued that the nature of science and
spate of reports detailing bioethical issues should be used in
biological literacy classes to promote biological literacy
problems with American
science education and scientific lit- It is essential for biologically liter- for students. Ewing et al. (1987)
eracy was the publication of several ate students to know and under- report a study in which college stu-
books describing what people should stand the characteristics of scien- dents read about bioethical issues
know about science-to help people tific knowledge, the values of science, from sources other than textbooks
become scientifically literate (AAAS and the methods and processes of and engaged in discussions that made
1989, Flaste 1991, Hazen and Trefil scientific inquiry. A biologically lit- connections between those readings
1991, Hirsch 1987). Can the read- erate individual should understand and citizenship. The research sup-
ing of one or more of these books biological principles and major con- ported the investigators' hypothesis
produce scientific literacy? Similarly, cepts of biology, the impact of hu- that incorporating bioethical issues
can students become scientifically mans on the biosphere, the processes in the biology curriculum encour-
literate after simply reading their of scientific inquiry, and the histori- ages scientific literacy among stu-
science textbooks or hearing lec- cal development of biological con- dents. Jones (1989) used the goal of
tures? cepts. He or she should develop per- biological literacy-the public's
Educators use the phrase scien- sonal values regarding scientific knowledge, understanding, and per-
tific literacy to express the major investigations, biodiversity and cul- spective about biological science-
goal of contemporary science edu- tural diversity, the impact of biol- to argue for incorporating nature
cation, an aim recognized for all ogy and biotechnology on society, study into contemporary biology
students. However, we-as scien- and the importance of biology to the curricula.
tists, teachers, and educators-must individual. And he or she should be Gibbs and Lawson (1992) stud-
define scientific literacy and under- able to think creatively, formulate ied the nature of scientific thinking
stand that achieving that goal is a questions about nature, reason logi- as reflected by the writing in high
complex and multifactorial prob- cally and critically, evaluate infor- school and college biology text-
lem. Only then can we help students mation, use biological technologies books. The authors concluded that
become more scientifically literate appropriately, make personal and because most textbooks do not por-
or can we develop a course or cur- ethical decisions related to biologi- tray an accurate view of the pro-
riculum in which all students con- cal issues, and apply biological cesses of science, the majority of
tribute to this goal. knowledge to solve problems. Americans are not scientifically lit-
In this article, we argue that bio- Most discussions of biological lit- erate-if scientific literacy means
logical literacy, a subset of scientific eracy use the term as a goal that one understanding how scientists do sci-
literacy, is not a single endpoint that either achieves or does not, that is, a ence. Demastes and Wandersee
can be attained within one biology person either is biologically literate (1992) suggested that the essence of
course, but it is a continuum over or is not. It is much more appropri- biological literacy is understanding
which a person's understanding de- ate to recognize that each individual a small number of pervasive bio-
velops throughout life. We outline occupies a position somewhere along logical principles and applying them
four levels-nominal, functional, a continuum of biological literacy in appropriate ways to activities in
structural, and multidimensional- for different biological concepts. personal and social spheres. The
of biological literacy (Table 1) for Accordingly, the task for biology authors recommended modifying
high school and college students. educators is to move students to a college courses to make biology more
We then describe characteristics of different position along the con- relevant to students.
students at each level, and we sug- tinuum-a position that implies a The phrase science as a way of
gest teaching strategies to promote richer understanding of biology. knowing concisely presents what we
the continued development of bio- think students should understand
logical literacy beyond the nominal about the nature of science. It is an
and functional levels.
Biological literacy: the concept ongoing process focused on gener-
Few biology educators have ad- ating and organizing knowledge. The
dressed the general topic of biologi- phrase, used by John A. Moore in a
by Gordon E. Uno and cal or scientific literacy. Those who series of volumes prepared for un-
Rodger W. Bybee have dealt with this issue have ar- dergraduate biology programs
553
September 1994
ISRSjT=iiIIi II
m